Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dynamic Strength of Rocks and Physical Nature of R
Dynamic Strength of Rocks and Physical Nature of R
net/publication/245568539
CITATIONS READS
23 615
3 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Chengzhi Qi on 31 May 2015.
Abstract: Time-dependence of rock deformation and fracturing is often ignored. However, the consideration of the
time-dependence is essential to the study of the deformation and fracturing processes of materials, especially for those subject to
strong dynamic loadings. In this paper, we investigate the deformation and fracturing of rocks, its physical origin at the
microscopic scale, as well as the mechanisms of the time-dependence of rock strength. Using the thermo-activated and
macro-viscous mechanisms, we explained the sensitivity of rock strength to strain rate. These mechanisms dominate the rock
strength in different ranges of strain rates. It is also shown that a strain-rate dependent Mohr-Coulomb-type constitutive
relationship can be used to describe the influence of strain rate on dynamic rock fragmentation. A relationship between the
particle sizes of fractured rocks and the strain rate is also proposed. Several time-dependent fracture criteria are discussed, and
their intrinsic relations are discussed. Finally, the application of dynamic strength theories is discussed.
Key words: rock dynamics; deformation and fracturing; time-dependence; dynamic strength; criteria of fracturing
restore broken atomic bonds, e.g. by sealing micro- Table 1 The fracturing strengths of rocks [6].
fractures in clays). The ratio of
Static strength Dynamic strength
Rocks dynamic strength to
(MPa) (MPa)
The foregoing discussion deals with the kinetic static strength
nature of the breakage of bonds at atomic scales. Limestone 42.56 276.62 6.5
lg (τ(s))
Large grain bending
lg (τ(s))
lg (τ(s))
Pure bending
Axis
barrier and to increase the distances between atoms. Spallation Small grain
symmetry
experiment No failure under experiment
The process of fracturing localization also needs a pulse loading
From the above discussion, we can conclude that It can be observed from Fig.1 that when τ >10−5 s,
material strengths are not physical constants and the loading is quasi-static and a weak time-dependence
fracturing of solids needs time to be activated, to develop of failure stress is observed. When τ<10−5 s, failure
and to complete. These conclusions are also based on stress increases remarkably with a decrease in loading
time.
experimental data. Indeed, many solids show the strain
It can be observed from Figs.2 and 3 that dynamic
rate sensitivity of strength. In this case, new parameters,
strength rapidly increases with the strain rate when
e.g. strain rate or stress rate, should be taken into strain rate ε >10 s−1 [8].
account in the description of deformation and To establish deformation and fracturing models for
fracturing of solids. Dynamic strength theories expand surrounding rocks of tunnels, it is necessary to apply
upon traditional and kinetic strength theories of solids dynamic strength theories and failure criteria.
by considering the dynamic effects induced by high
strain rate loading.
Yield or fracture limit (MPa)
4.2 Stain rate sensitivity of rock strength more adiabatic. In this case, according to current
Under moderate uniaxial tension, the expected life knowledge, phonon damping (macroscopic viscosity)
time (instigation of loading to failure) τ may be plays a predominant role.
determined by Zhurkov’s formula: The investigation shows the general features of
⎛ U − γσ t ⎞ dynamic strength of solids as illustrated in Fig.4 [11].
τ = τ 0 exp ⎜ 0 ⎟ (1)
⎝ KT ⎠ In a low strain rate regime, the strength of materials
where U 0 is the activation energy, σ t is the uniaxial increases slowly as the strain rate increases. This
tensile stress, γ is the activation volume, and τ 0 is regime is provisionally named Regime 1. When the
a temporal parameter which is in the order of the strain rate exceeds a threshold value, the strength
thermal vibration period of atoms [9]. increases rapidly with the increase of the strain rate.
Zhurkov’s formula shows the thermo-activated This regime is named Regime 2. When the strain rate
nature of deformation and fracturing of solids, which is very high, the dependence of strength on strain rate
gives the dependence of the strength on the life time as becomes weak again and is somewhat similar to that in
1⎛ τ ⎞ Regime 1. This regime is named Regime 3 (Fig.4).
σ = Y = ⎜ U 0 + KT ln 0 ⎟ (2)
γ⎝ τ ⎠
where ε 0 is the limit deformation at failure, and ε is
Dynamic strength
the constant strain rate of loading process.
When τ = ε 0 / ε , the Eq.(2) becomes
1⎡ ⎛ ε 0 ⎞⎤
σ =Y = ⎢U 0 + KT ⎜ ln ε − ln ⎟ ⎥ (3)
γ⎣ ⎝ τ 0 ⎠⎦
.
ε1 .
εs .
ε2 .
ε
i.е. Fig.4 Dependence of dynamic strength on strain rates of brittle
materials ( ε1 ≈ 100–10 s−1, εs ≈ 10 s−1, ε2 ≈ 10 s−1).
2 3 4
1⎛ ε ⎞
σ = Y = ⎜ U 0 + KT ln ⎟ (4)
γ⎝ ε0 ⎠ The smooth transition from Regime 1 to Regime 2
where ε0 = ε 0 / τ 0 represents the maximum possible represents a gradual change of the deformation and
tensile strain rate in the material. failure mechanisms during the transition, i.e. the thermo-
A similar formula holds true for the dynamic shear activated mechanism gradually loses its predominance
strength Yτ : and phonon damping (macroscopic viscosity) gradually
1⎛ γ ⎞ emerges as the dominant mechanism. However, the two
Yτ = ⎜ G0 + KT ln ⎟ (5)
γτ ⎝ γ0 ⎠ mechanisms do coexist.
In Regime 2, the material behavior is closely related
where γ τ is the activation volume under shear
to its viscosity. Generally, viscosity can be defined as
deformation, G0 is the activation energy, γ is the
the transport of momentum along a velocity gradient.
shear strain rate, and γ 0 is the limit shear strain,
γ0 = γ 0 / τ 0 . In a steady shock wave process, viscosity can be
In principle, the dependence of the compressive viewed as the diffusion of momentum along the axis of
strengths of solids on strain rate is similar to that of the wave propagation [12]. The viscosity is commonly
tensile strengths, but the values of the parameters in considered to be a material property, which describes
the formulae are different. Only compressive and shear proportionality between a viscous stress component
strengths will be examined in this paper. Qi and Qian and the velocity gradient or strain rate, and depends on
[10] have re-derived Zhurkov’s formula on the basis of temperature. However, more complex constitutive
microscopic theory. behaviors can appear under shock loading.
Experiments by Stavrogin and Protosenja [11] The transition from Regime 2 to Regime 3 is
showed that Eqs.(4) and (5) can describe the strain rate accompanied by weaker dependence of strength on strain
sensitivity of compressive, shear and tensile strengths rate. Kipp et al. [13] determined the fracturing stresses
of solids at relatively low strain rates. Their results of penny-shaped cracks at different strain rates. They
indicate that a thermo-activated mechanism dominates showed that when the strain rate grows, the fracturing
the strain rate sensitivity of strength. When the strain stress of cracks increases in magnitude and becomes
rate exceeds a certain threshold value, the strain rate effectively independent of crack size at very high strain
sensitivity of strength moves into a new regime, where rates. At very high strain rates, a wide range of crack
the strength increases rapidly with increases in the strain sizes is initiated simultaneously and the failure grows by
rate, and the deformation and fracturing of solids are multiple cracks growth and coalescence. An experimental
Qihu Qian et al. / Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. 2009, 1 (1): 1–10 5
demonstration of this effect was reported by Kalthoff The divergence of viscosity within a rock, even one
and Shockey [14] using short pulse loading on cracks that is experiencing a constant deformation rate, is very
with finite lengths. The results imply that in the large. This is obviously related to the fact that
transition process from Regime 2 to Regime 3, the effect deformation and fracturing take place at different scales.
of locality (or localization) of deformation and Rocks have multi-level structures. This observation
fracturing is reduced gradually, and homogeneity of is critical for the determination of their physical and
deformation and fracturing gradually emerges. mechanical properties. For example, the viscosity of a
At high strain rates, the number of crack nuclei grows rock is directly related to its multi-level structure. In
rapidly due to the thermo-fluctuation rupture of inter- engineering practice, viscosity can be grouped into
molecular bonds in intact regions, in addition to the three scales, i.e. macro-, meso-, and microscopic levels.
athermal growth of cracks. In other words, the Mathematically, viscosity η is expressed by the
thermo-activated mechanism is reactivated in the following equation:
absence of a significant stress concentration. The η = Gτ ′ (6)
presence of defects only results in an increase in the rate where G is the shear modulus and τ ′ is the relaxation
of these ruptures due to the specific local features of time [15].
energy dissipation in the deformation and fracturing The relaxation of materials is due to not only the
process of solids. The last situation should cause a relative sliding between structural elements, but also the
weaker dependence on temperature of solid strength in reorganization of these elements and their internal structural
sub-microsecond lifetime intervals. At very high stain changes. Thus, rock relaxation is accompanied by
rates, the material fragments after fracturing are very dilatancy. When a rock structure is fractured, stress
small due to the simultaneous initiation of damage concentrations arise, which then diminish with time.
throughout the solid volume. This relaxation time is proportional to the structural
Therefore, based on analysis of the available experimental element size and inversely proportional to the growth
data, another conclusion about the dependence of solid velocity of the induced flaws. During the process of
strength on strain rate can be drawn. At low strain rates, dilatancy, structural flaws tend to occur somewhat
the deformation and fracturing of rocks are controlled uniformly in the rock. The growth velocity of the
by the thermo-activated mechanism and the strength induced flaws (e.g. dislocation and micro- and macro-
sensitivity to strain rate can be expressed by Eqs.(4) and cracks) is limited. Also, it depends on the applied
(5). When the strain rate increases, the phonon damping external stresses and therefore on stress relaxation.
(macroscopic viscosity) mechanism emerges, and From a phenomenological point of view, the growth
gradually plays the dominant role. Since the crack velocity of flaws is assumed to be a function of strain
propagation velocity in a solid is limited by the Rayleigh rate, i.e.
wave velocity, the viscosity coefficient decreases with the ν = ν (ε ) (7)
strain rate. At the structural level, the decrease of Expanding Eq.(7) into Taylor’s series, we obtain
viscosity with the strain rate activates internal degrees of ν (ε ) = ν 0 + αε + ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ (8)
freedom and the related motion of meso-particles. At where ν 0 = ν 0 (0) may be regarded as the growth
very high strain rates, the stress attained in solids velocity of flaws at a fixed magnitude of deformation.
approaches the theoretical limit of the strengths. In this It is necessary here to point out that the thermo-
case, a wide range of crack sizes is simultaneously activated mechanism also contributes to the velocity of
initiated. In intact areas, the inter-molecular bonds are the growth of flaws. Experiments show that the
broken. These broken bonds serve as the growing propagation velocity of cracks (growth velocity of
athermal nuclei of damage, and the thermo-activated flaws) is limited to the range from 0.2 to 0.5 of the
mechanism is reactivated. This means that the shear wave velocity. Taking this into consideration, we
localization of the deformation and damage is gradually choose the following formula to approximate the
lost. Thus, the thermo-activated mechanism again change of growth velocity with strain rate due only to
emerges as the dominant mechanism of deformation and macro-viscosity:
fracture at high strain rates. Also, the strength sensitivity ⎛ 1 + λε n ⎞
to strain rate can be considered as the result of ν = b⎜ ⎟ (9)
⎝ ξε ⎠
n
1 + ε n
where C1 is an experimental constant. 1⎛ γ ⎞ b1 (γ / γ S ) n
Yτ D = ⎜ 0
G + KT ln ⎟+ (19)
Equation (11) is similar to the second term of the γτ ⎝ γ0 ⎠ (γ / γ S ) n + 1
following expression: The temperature rise caused by impact affects the
ln(ε / ε0 ) (ε / εs ) n −1 strength of a solid. Generally, the strength of a metal
η=A +C (n ≥ 1) (12)
ε [(ε / εs ) n + 1] decreases significantly when the temperature reaches
where ε0 is a deformation rate on the order of 1012 s−1, 85%–90% of its melting temperature, and is different
εs is an approximation parameter, and C is an from the results calculated by Eqs.(18) and (19).
experimental constant [16]. However, the melting temperatures of rocks are
In this case, the first term on the right-hand side of significantly higher than those of metals. Generally the
Eq.(12) may be regarded as the contribution of the temperature caused by impact in rock is not very
thermo-activated mechanism of deformation [16], and close to the melting temperature. Therefore, Eqs.(18)
the second term is the contribution of the macro- and (19) are applicable to rocks.
viscosity mechanism. The thermo-activated mechanism acts more significantly
Hence, the macro-viscosity can be expressed as near stress concentration areas and along grain
(ε / εs )n −1 boundaries at low strain rates. At very high strain rates,
ηmacv = C (13)
[(ε / εs ) n + 1] the thermo-activated mechanism is activated again in
From the above analysis, it is shown that an increase the intact areas of rocks, but the parameters in Eqs.(4)
of the deformation rate leads to a decrease of viscosity, and (5) in these regimes should be different, with γ ,
which means that the deformation and fracturing of γ τ being less at high strain rates.
rocks gradually converge at the macro- and micro- The experimental data for silicon carbide, aluminum
scopic scales. oxide, granodiorite and dolomite are shown in Fig.5.
The compressive strength sensitivity to the strain rate then The left parts of the experimental curves are almost
can be expressed as the summation of the following two straight horizontal lines (Fig.5(a)). Thus, it is very easy
terms ( YD is the compressive strength, and Yτ D is the to determine items U 0 / γ , K / γ , G / γ S and K / γ S
shear strength): in Eqs.(18) and (19) by data fitting.
YD = YT (ε ) + YV (ε ) (14)
(Uniaxial stress)
Yτ D = Yτ T (γ ) + Yτ V (γ )
(15)
–▲–, –■– Experimental data
The first term on the right-hand side of Eqs.(14) and
Dynamic strength (GPa)
(Uniaxial strain)
∫ σ (t )dt = ∫ ρ DVdt = ρ Du = J 0
tp tp
–▲–, –■– Experimental data (21)
Granodiorite: b = 4.3,
where u is the displacement at failure.
εs = 101.7, n = 1.5 The impulse criterion indicates the damage accumulation
nature of the fracturing processes, which coincides
Dolomite: b = 2.0, with Zhukov’s criterion.
εs = 102.8, n = 1.0 On the other hand, if the characteristic length of the
shock wave is L′ , then u = L′ε , and Eq.(21) becomes
10−6 10−3100 103 106
Strain rate (s−1)
∫
tp
(b) Granodiorite and dolomite. σ (t )dt = ρ DL′ε = J 0 (22)
0
Fig.5 Comparison of Eq.(18) with the experimental data.
which shows that fracturing takes place when strain
Considering that the contribution of macro-viscosity reaches a critical value. Therefore, the second strength
is very small at low strain rates, it may be argued that theory can be applied to dynamic fracturing problems.
the contribution of the thermo-activation mechanism The creep phenomenon and strength-strain rate
calculated by Eqs.(4) and (5) is also small, and that the sensitivity show the temporal effect of fracturing;
material strength is weakly dependent on the strain rate. their physical origin is identical. By multiplying
On the other hand, at high strain rates, the contribution Zhukov’s formula with the Aleksandro creep formula
of macro-viscosity, i.e. the second terms of the ε = ε0 exp[−(U 0 − γσ ) / KT ] , then τε = τ 0ε0 = εst is
right-hand side of Eqs.(18) and (19), is dominant. For obtained. Thus, the same conclusion is drawn, i.e. the
convenience, the left (horizontal) parts of the curves in critical failure strain is the same no matter what strain
Fig.5 may be prolonged to the right. The straight lines rate is applied.
Experiments show that, under shear, triaxial
are chosen as the basis for superimposing the contribution
compression and other complex loading conditions, in
of macro-viscosity.
a wide range of strain rates covering 9–10 orders of
According to the above descriptions, example
magnitude, the critical strain rate εst is only weakly
calculations have been carried out using Eqs.(18) and
dependent on temperature, stresses and strain rate.
(19). The results of these calculations are compared Thus, it can be considered as a constant [18]. This
with the experimental results reported by Grady [12]. situation indicates a close relationship between
The calculated and experimental results agree well deformation and fracturing. Therefore, the second
(Fig.5). This indicates that the given model has a sound strength theory may be considered as a quasi-temporal
physical basis, and it is applicable to a wide range of criterion.
strain rates, and is simple and convenient for practical 4.3.2 Failure criterion based on damage evolution
use. According to Kachanov [19], the evolution of the
For step-type loading and continuously changing damage parameter ψ may be described by the
load σ (t ) , Bailey’s damage accumulation criterion can following equation:
be used: ⎧ ⎛ σ ⎞n
Δt dt dψ ⎪A (σ ≥ 0)
∑ τ (σi ) = 1 or ∫0 τ [σ (t )] = 1 = f (σ , ψ ) = ⎨ ⎜⎝ 1 − ψ ⎟⎠
tp
(20) (23)
i
dt ⎪
where t is time, the subscript “i” denotes the loading ⎩0 (σ ≤ 0)
ordering, tp is the loading time to failure, and τ (σ i ) Failure takes place when the damage parameter
is the life time of material under stress σ i . reaches its critical value.
4.3 Other strength theories that consider temporal Integrating Eq.(23) yields
factors 1 − (1 − ψ p ) n +1
∫0
tp
σ n
dt = = J0 (24)
4.3.1 Nikiforovsky-Shemyakin impulse criterion A(n + 1)
According to the Nikiforovsky-Shemyakin impulse which coincides with the criterion of Eq.(22) when
criterion [17], when the total pulse J 0 reaches its limit n =1.
value, i.e. when ∫ σ (t )dt = J 0 , failure will take place. In
tp
4.3.3 Structural-temporal criterion
0
According to the principles of the fracture mechanics
a one-dimensional case, the relationship between the
of solids, when the average stress σ (t , x) over
stress in solids σ and the particle velocity V can be
spatial-temporal cells [t − τ , t ] × [0, d ] reaches its static
expressed as σ = ρ DV , where ρ is the solid’s
strength σ c , failure takes place, i.e.
density and D is the shock wave propagation velocity.
1
τ∫
dt ′∫ σ (t ′, r )dr ≤ σ c
t d
Substituting this relationship into the Nikiforovsky- (25)
t −τ 0
Shemyakin impulse criterion gives
8 Qihu Qian et al. / Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. 2009, 1 (1): 1–10
where r is the spatial coordinate. This criterion is called 1 + sin φ ⎡ C b(ε / εs ) n ⎤ AC0
Morozov-Petrov’s structural-temporal criterion [20].
σ1 = σ 3 + ⎢σ YS + ⎥e (31)
1 − sin φ ⎣ (ε / εs ) n + 1 ⎦
If we introduce a new parameter J c = σ cτ c , then
For underground explosions, explosion-induced
Eq.(25) becomes
fractures occur in proximity to the center of the
∫ dt ′∫ σ (t ′, r )dr = J c (t )
t d
(26) explosion by a shear mechanism. The problem may be
t −τ 0
where τ c is the fracture incubation time corresponding simplified furthermore, because ε r >> εθ , where ε r
to the characteristic time for the energy transfer between is the radial strain and ε θ is the tangential strain.
two neighboring cells d/v′, where v′ is the elastic wave Therefore, the shear strain ε γ = ε r − ε θ ≈ ε r , and the
velocity and d is the structural element size. volumetric strain are approximated as ε v = ε r + 2εθ ≈ ε r .
Therefore, Morozov-Petrov’s structural-temporal criterion Furthermore, it can be taken ε = εr . The relationship
is physically manifested as a critical structural impulse. between the two principal stresses is σ 1 = ασ 3 , where
4.3.4 Mohr-Coulomb-type constitutive models of strain α = C0 = μ /(1 − μ ) and μ is Poisson’s ratio.
rate dependence In this case, the M-C criterion in the vicinity of
The M-C criterion is a simple and practical criterion explosion may be written as
for geological materials. The strengths of geological 1 + sin φ ⎡ C b(ε / εs ) n ⎤ Aα
σ1 = σ 3 + ⎢σ YS + ⎥e (32)
materials show a significant strain rate dependency 1 − sin φ ⎣ (ε / εs ) n + 1 ⎦
(sensitivity). Therefore, when analyzing geomechanical 4.3.5 Fragment size of fractured rock mass under
problems, it is necessary to consider the dependence of dynamic loading
strength on strain rates. Under general stress states The strength of a fractured rock mass depends on the
expressed in terms of principal stresses, the Mohr- sample size. Generally, the compressive strength of
Coulomb failure criterion can be written materials σ D can be expressed as a function of the
σ1 − σ 3 σ1 + σ 3 sample size D as follows [21, 22]:
= sin φ + c cos φ (27)
2 2 σ D = σ 0 (1 + D / D0 )−1 2 (33)
where σ 1 and σ 3 are the maximum and minimum
where σ 0 and D0 are constants.
principal stresses, respectively, φ is the internal friction
If D0 in Eq.(33) is replaced by Δi /D0, where Δi is
angle, and c is the internal cohesion of the material.
the size of blocks of i-th rank, then Eq.(33) becomes
With a uniaxial compression test, the internal
cohesion c can be determined by σ D = σ 0 (1 + Δi / D0 ) −1 2 (34)
σ C (1 − sin φ ) which can be rewritten as
c= Y (28) Δi = D0 [(σ 0 / σ )2 − 1] (35)
2cos φ
where parameter σ D is replaced by σ representing
where σ YC is the uniaxial compressive strength.
the applied load.
Substituting Eq.(18) into Eq.(28), we obtain
Replacing σ in Eq.(35) by the strength of rock
1 − sin φ ⎡ 1 ⎛ ε ⎞ b(ε / εs )n ⎤ AC0 mass, the following formula is obtained to determine
c= ⎢ ⎜ U 0 + KT ln ⎟ + ⎥e (29)
2 cos φ ⎣ γ ⎝ ε0 ⎠ (ε / εs )n + 1⎦ the fragment size of fractured rock mass:
The last term in Eq.(29), e AC0 , expresses the ⎡⎛ σ ⎞ 2 ⎤
Δi = D0 ⎢⎜ 0 ⎟ − 1⎥ (36)
influence of strain on internal cohesion, and C0 = σ 1 / σ 3 ⎢⎣⎝ Yτ ⎠ ⎥⎦
is a parameter of stress state. Equation (36) shows that the mean fragment sizes of
Substituting Eq.(29) into Eq.(27), a Mohr-Coulomb- fractured rock mass decrease with the growth of
type failure (strength) criterion with strain rate dependence external loads.
can be obtained. This conclusion is confirmed by quasi-static and
For loading conditions with high strain rates, the dynamic experiments. In the case of a one-fold fracture,
thermo-activated term may be replaced by static under both dynamic and quasi-static conditions, Fig.6
uniaxial compressional strength σ YS C
because of the shows the relationship between the specific shear
weak influence of the thermo-activated term on deformation energy Eτ and mean fragment size D
strength: given by the same curve [23]. This relationship applies
σ 1 − σ 3 = (σ 1 + σ 3 )sin φ + (1 − sin φ ) ⋅ to both shear fracture and cleavage fracture, which can
⎡ C b(ε / εs ) n ⎤ AC0 (30) be approximated by the following equation:
⎢σ YS + ⎥e
⎣ (ε / εs ) n + 1 ⎦ 1 3 E
D~ = (37)
or Eτ 1 + μ (σ r − σ φ ) 2
Qihu Qian et al. / Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. 2009, 1 (1): 1–10 9
considered below.
According to the traditional strength theories, tensile
(1)
stress occurs when a stress wave reflects from free
surfaces. When the resultant tensile stresses at some
Eτ /4 (MPa)
Shear
distance from the free surfaces reach a critical value σ t ,
Cleavage spalling takes place at that distance x = σ t /(2σ m ) ,
where σ m is the amplitude of the stress wave.
However, according to the new strength theories, every
point in the rock covered by the reflected wave is under
(2)
tensile stress and prone to tensile fracturing, i.e. spalling.
D (mm) In a rock section where tensile stresses are small at a
Fig.6 Dependence of specific shear deformation energy on rock particular time, it is reasonable to assume that the rock
fragment size based on the results of (1) a chemical explosion will need a longer time to be fractured. Such a section
blast (0.4 g) and (2) quasi-static experiments when σ22 = 0 MPa.
may fracture simultaneously with other sections where
where σ r and σ φ are the radial and tangential stresses tensile stress is greater and incubation time for fracture
respectively. is longer, i.e. connected rock within a definite width may
Replacing σ r − σ φ in Eq.(37) by 2Yτ , the following fracture simultaneously. Experiments validate this
result is obtained: hypothesis. Therefore, spalling zones generally are
1 3 E defined to have certain widths (or thickness), which in
D~ = (38) turn means that spalling zones have internal structures.
Eτ 4(1 + μ ) Yτ2
It is apparent that the simulation of such an event will
which has the same D - Yτ dependence as Eq.(36). not be realistic if we use traditional static strength
To predict the mean fragment size under uniaxial theories to simulate dynamic fracture.
dynamic loading, Yτ should be replaced in Eq.(36) by
5.2 Safety thresholds for explosive detonations
YD or Yτ D , which are determined by Eq.(18) and (19)
Ground vibration induced by explosions may damage
respectively.
surface infrastructure and underground facilities. The
For predicting the mean fragment size near the center
decisive parameters for assessing the likely degree of
of the explosion, Eq.(36) is used. But, the dynamic shear
damage and the safety of proximal infrastructure are the
strength of rock mass should be determined by the
seismic vibration parameters: acceleration, particle velocity,
following formula:
and displacement. At present, consensus on the issue of
⎡1⎛ γ ⎞ b (γ / γS )n ⎤ AC which parameters should be used for safety evaluations
Yτ D = ⎢ ⎜ G0 + KT ln ⎟ + 1 ⎥e (39)
⎣γτ ⎝ γ0 ⎠ (γ / γS ) n + 1 ⎦ of structures by explosion-induced seismicity has not
Under external loads, fracturing takes place on the been completely resolved. Most jurisdictions around the
structural surfaces of the largest scale fragments in the world take the ground surface velocity as the control
medium. The fragment size is the characteristic size of parameter. The use of such a parameter agrees with
the structural elements at this scale. A further increase in in-situ investigation, i.e. it is the ground surface velocity
the stress intensity results in fracturing at the next lower or displacement, not internal forces, that controls the
scale, and the size of fragments is the characteristic size damage to buildings and facilities. This also agrees with
of the structural elements at that scale. The increases of the modern strength theories.
strain rate, confining pressure and plastic strain hardening According to the modern strength theories, the
may enhance the strength of the medium. Consequently, damage to infrastructure under explosion-induced ground
the deformation and fracturing may cover the small-scale vibration is caused by dynamic failures. The control
levels of a rock mass and the fragment size will decrease. parameter for dynamic failure is displacement or particle
velocity. Considering that displacement is the integration
5 Application of modern strength theories of velocity over time, the introduction of failure criteria
involving vibration velocity and frequency as controlling
5.1 Internal structure of a spallation plane parameters, as proposed by American Mining Bureau,
The introduction of temporal factors into strength and authorities in Germany and Finland, is more
criteria improves our understanding of failure mechanisms, reasonable. Large numbers of observations show that,
and may produce results that are significantly different under the same geological conditions, at the same site
from those of traditional strength theories. As an and for the same type of structures, the degree of
example, the spallation problem for the propagation of a damage to the structures is the same when the vibration
triangular impulse stress wave without rise time is velocity exceeds a characteristic value for the particular
10 Qihu Qian et al. / Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. 2009, 1 (1): 1–10