Kithure M'mwenda Nyaga vTeachers Service Commission [2014] eKLR

Case Number: Miscellaneous Application 16 of 2014

Date Delivered: 31 Mar 2014
Case Class: Civil
Court: Employment and Labour Relations Court at
Nairobi
Case Action: Ruling
Judge: Linnet Ndolo
Citation: Kithure M'mwenda Nyaga vTeachers Service
Commission [2014] eKLR
Advocates: -
Case Summary: -
Court Division: Industrial Court
History Magistrates: -
County: -
Docket Number: -
History Docket Number: -
Case Outcome: Allowed
History County: -
Representation By Advocates: -
Advocates For: -
Advocates Against: -
Sum Awarded: -
The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law
as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the
information.

http://www.kenyalaw.org - Page 1/3

 Kithure M'mwenda Nyaga vTeachers Service Commission [2014] eKLR

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI

MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO 16 OF 2014

KITHURE M'MWENDA NYAGA...........................APPLICANT

VS

TEACHERS SERVICE COMMISSION.........RESPONDENT

RULING

1. The Applicant's application brought by way of Notice of Motion dated 24th February 2014 seeks
leave of this Court to file a suit against the Respondent out of time. The application is based on the
ground that soon after his dismissal from the Respondent's employment, the Applicant began to suffer
from a mental ailment for which he underwent treatment. The application is supported by the Applicant’s
affidavit sworn on 24th February 2014

2. By letter dated 15th January 2014, the Applicant's doctor has confirmed that his mental status has
now stabilized. The Applicant worked for the Respondent from 24th March 1990 until 6th May 2004 when
he was dismissed on allegations of insubordination. Soon after his dismissal, the Applicant was hit by a
mental illness and was therefore unable to pursue a claim against the Respondent.

3. The Respondent filed Grounds of Opposition on 7th March 2014 stating that this Court lacks
jurisdiction to extend time for filing of a claim. The Respondent further states that the Applicant has not
adduced sufficient grounds to support his application and that he is guilty of unreasonable delay.

4. The Applicant's application is brought under Sections 4(1) and 22 of the Limitation of Actions Act,
Section 12 of the Industrial Court Act, 2011 and Rule 16 of the Industrial Court (Procedure) Rules, 2010.

5. Section 4(1) (a) of the Limitation of Actions Act provides that actions founded on contract may not
be brought after the end of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued.

6. Part III of the Limitation of Actions Act provides specific instances in which time may be extended
under the Act. Counsel for the Respondent referred the Court to the case of Divecon Limited Vs
Shirinkhanu Sadrudin Samani (Civil Appeal No. 142 of 1997) in which the Court of Appeal held that
Part III does not confer jurisdiction on courts to entertain applications for extension of time with respect to
actions arising from contract.

7. In my view, Divecon Vs Samani addressed itself to situations where the limitation period has
actually run out as against a claimant and is therefore distinguishable from the case before this Court.
Chitty on Contracts (Volume I) at page 28-065 states that time begins to run against a claimant who is
in a position to commence proceedings but neglects to do so.

8. According to the document dated 15th January 2014 issued by Dr. Kisivuli A.J, Consultant
Psychiatrist, the Applicant suffered a disability from June 2005 until 15th January 2014 and was therefore
not in a position to bring his claim during this period. The Court therefore finds that time did not begin to
run against the Applicant until 15thJanuary 2014 when the doctor confirmed that he had regained normal

http://www.kenyalaw.org - Page 2/3

 Kithure M'mwenda Nyaga vTeachers Service Commission [2014] eKLR

capacity.

9. The Applicant's application to file his claim out of time is therefore allowed. The costs of this
application will be in the cause.

DATED SIGNED AND DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT NAIROBI THIS 31ST DAY OF MARCH
2014

LINNET NDOLO

JUDGE

In the Presence of:

..........................................................................................................................................Applicant

.......................................................................................................................................Respondent
While the design, structure and metadata of the Case Search database are licensed by Kenya Law under a Creative Commons
Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International, the texts of the judicial opinions contained in it are in the public domain and are free from any copyright restrictions.
Read our Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

http://www.kenyalaw.org - Page 3/3

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)