Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Conservation - and - Biodiversity MS
Conservation - and - Biodiversity MS
(b) (i) A species of organism, of which numbers are so low that there
is a likelihood of its becoming extinct in the near future/owtte [1];
named species [1];
[IUCN definition = taxa in danger of extinction and whose
survival is unlikely if causal factors continue operating.
Includes taxa with numbers at a critical level; those with
drastically reduced habitats; and those not seen in the wild in
the past 50 years.] 2
1
2. (a) Long-term increase/period of stability for several hundred million years/
equilibrium?/major decline around 200 million/several smaller
extinction periods [1]; possibly due to catastrophic events/changes
in environment causing mass extinctions [1]; long-term increase
possibly due to increase in diversity of environment, e.g. as land
colonised by plants [1]. max 2
(e) Any two of: Aesthetic (no longer able to see tigers, elephants)/
may be important ecologically/may be important economically
(might be useful for food/fibre/drugs/biological control/medical
research)/good effect, e.g. extinction of smallpox/people/stock
less likely to be attacked by top predators/greater area or less
competition for food for humans/any reasonable answer. max 2
2
3. (a) Biodiversity is the variety of forms of life on earth [1];
encompasses species, habitat and genetic diversity [1]/generic
term for the abundance of and number of species on earth. 2 max
(ii) Accept any appropriate argument for any of the four ecosystems.
e.g. tropical rainforest – under most pressure from humans in
clearing and burning the forest [1]; highest species diversity/
many ecological niches [1];
e.g. desert - productivity easily damaged [1];
long recovery time [1]/more disturbed areas [1]. 2 max
(d) For named example award no marks, but award [1] for each
valid reason up to [2].
e.g. Dodo – ground-living/tame so vulnerable/small total
population/hunted by sailors as food. 2 max
3
4. (a) Description [1]; explanation [2]. Number of species inversely
proportional to altitude [1]/Lower the altitude, more bird species [1];
at higher altitudes, temperature decreases so less NPP and so less
food for birds [1]; less species at 3000 m and over as there is less
land at these heights [1]/less ecological niches at altitude so less
diversity [1]/low biological productivity of high altitude
ecosystems [1] 0–500 m may include sea birds [1]/any
reasonable explanation [1] 3 max
(b) Habitat diversity – the range of different habitats per unit area [1];
Species diversity – the heterogeneity of species in a given area [1] 2
(f) Award [1] for brief description of named area and up to [2] for
management strategies. 3
[15]
4
5. (a) (i) right whale; 1
(ii) pollution of seas/overfishing/overexploitation of food species/
e.g. harvesting of krill in Antarctic/climate change – degradation
of habitats/distortion of food chains; 1 max
5
(c) Allow any three of the following.
isolation – geographic or reproductive;
changing environments;
variation in populations;
mutation in populations;
natural selection;
survival of the fittest;
competition; 3 max
(d) advantages
easier to involve humans in identification of attractive species/
e.g. WWF and pandas;
breeding programmes in zoos → increasing population numbers;
possible to control international trade/CITES;
disadvantages not protecting habitats;
organisms cannot survive if not in habitat;
only focuses on endangered/conspicuous/attractive species;
led by public opinion; 4 max
(e) Allow [1] for each pair considered. Allow for any reasoned argument.
might support greater species diversity/higher population numbers
of each species/greater productivity at each trophic level → longer
food chains;
edge effect increased in B → risk of disturbance/drift of pollutants/
greater productivity → more top carnivores in A/territory greater for
top carnivores in A/smaller units in B cannot support as high
biodiversity as A;
gene flow between reserves easier in A/movement of species
easier – top carnivores/can move between reserves in A;
edge effect lower in A/perimeter : area ratio lower in A (see also (2)
above)/smaller units in B cannot support as high diversity as A; 4
[15]
6
(b) Award [1] for any of the following, up to [3 max].
Nigeria:
birth rate high;
medical care and sanitation improvements;
infant mortality decreasing;
death rate decreasing;
relatively little use of family planning methods;
social factors (e.g. young age of marriage);
religious beliefs (e.g. Islam encourages larger families);
children needed to work on land;
or
China:
birth rate high;
medical care and sanitation improvements;
infant mortality decreasing;
death rate decreasing;
recent efforts to control population growth (e.g. one child policy)/
improved access to contraception methods;
social factors (e.g. ratio male : female/preference for boys : girls); 3 max
(c) (i) the extent to which a given interaction with the environment
exploits and utilizes the natural income without causing
long-term deterioration to the natural capital/(improving
the quality of human life while) living within the carrying
capacity of supporting ecosystems/OWTTE; 1
7
8. (a) 2.075 % (allow values between 2.0 and 2.1); 1
(b) (i) mammals;
(ii) invertebrates; 1
Both answers needed for [1].
8
(c) (i) Award [1] each for two of the following.
natural hazard events:
volcanic eruptions;
droughts;
floods;
global catastrophic events:
glaciation;
meteor impact;
change in climate; 2 max
10. Award [1] each for four of the following. Reward detail, logical argument
and named examples.
large areas usually preferred to small;
as they can conserve a greater variety of habitats/microhabitats;
and higher numbers of individual organisms;
and thus greater genetic variability;
larger areas have smaller proportional length of perimeter;
and thus fewer edge effects than small areas;
e.g. disturbance, drift of pollutants;
similarly, compact areas preferred to elongate/irregular;
“corridors” sometimes useful for connecting isolated or small reserves; 4 max
Any other appropriate point.
[4]
9
11. (a) describe:
very low numbers of extinctions before 1650;
slightly higher number 1651 to 1850/approximately 0.5 species
per year;
rapid increase 1851 to 1950/approximately 2.5 per year;
decrease in extinction rate since 1951 to approximately one
species per annum; 2 max
explain:
extinction rate before 1850 low as human effect on biodiversity low
as population pressure on environment relatively low;
extinctions before 1850 not fully recorded;
extinction rate 1851 to 1950 much higher due to rapid human
population increase;
and rapid rate of habitat loss;
decrease in extinction rate since 1951 due to greater efforts to
protect endangered species and ecosystems;
or many vulnerable species already extinct;
any other reasonable points; 3 max
(c) endangered:
species in danger of becoming extinct in the immediate future
because their numbers have declined to a critical level;
extinct:
species believed to no longer exist alive; 2 max
10
(d) Any reasonable example: reasons must be appropriate to example.
[1] for name and [2] for reasons e.g.
name: Dodo;
reasons: confined to small island (Mauritius);
extreme tameness;
hunting as a source of food by visiting sailors;
destruction of forest habitats;
competition with introduced organisms, e.g. pigs; 3 max
Note: recent research has suggested that dodos were not very tame
and that the flesh was unpleasant to taste; thus habitat
destruction and introduction of pigs (and rats) were
probably most significant factors. However, the points
given above are widely mentioned in the literature and
may be considered acceptable responses.
(e) (i) [1] for name, [1] for brief description e.g.
Kakadu National Park, Northern Territory, Australia;
tropical savanna with extensive wetlands; 2 max
11
12. (a) Award [1] for name e.g. Peregrine falcon.
legislation (e.g. ban hunting);
cloning;
artificial breeding/zoos;
creating new reserves/parks;
protection of habitats;
reduction in use of toxic substances (e.g. DDT); 3 max
Any other reasonable suggestion.
(b) Answers only need to show one advantage and one disadvantage
for each of the listed approaches to conservation. 6 max
Advantage Disadvantage
Zoos controlled breeding; problems reintroducing
allow for research; animals to wild;
allow for education; prisons for animals;
extreme protection for sends wrong message –
individuals; “we don’t need to worry”;
tend to favour “popular”
animals;
small genetic pool;
Creation of conserves whole difficult to manage;
reserves or ecosystem; very expensive;
protected areas prevents hunting;
protects from humans;
Convention on signed by many countries; difficulty enforcing treaty;
International Trade protects many species; many countries have not
in Endangered signed it;
Species (CITES) implementation varies from
country to country;
13
loss of beauty/aesthetic values;
study of wild species may help scientists understand events from
the past;
important from an ethical/spiritual/philosophical perspective;
non-natural processes, such as pollution, are increasing the loss
of biodiversity;
disagree:
evidence of past extinctions;
appropriate examples (dinosaurs, ammonites);
reasons for natural extinctions (meteorite impact, climatic change,
glaciation);
natural turnover of taxa through evolution; 2 max
Credit other appropriate reasons.
(c) strengths:
supported by many countries (145);
lists many species (almost 700);
bans commercialization of many products/species;
appropriate examples (rhinoceros horn, ivory, tiger parts);
weaknesses:
enforcement is difficult;
small fines;
many countries have not signed;
support by some countries has been lukewarm;
favours large/conspicuous/attractive organisms;
appropriate examples (poaching of ivory in Africa continues); 2 max
[8]
14
(ii) freshwater fish 4.9 %; (accept 4 to 5 %) 1
Both required for the mark.
(b) (i) facing a very high risk of extinction in the wild in the near future; 1
(ii) example of currently endangered species e.g. giant panda/blue whale; 1
15
(b)
Governmental Non-governmental
organization organization
use of media media liaison officers use footage of activities
prepare and read a written (e.g. chasing whaling boats)
statement to gains media attention;
speed of response considered/slow/there must rapid;
be consensus between
member governments
political/diplomati considerable/activities are unaffected by political
c constraints hindered by political considerations/activities
decisions/there may be may be illegal;
disagreements between
political parties or member
nations (international
organizations)
enforceability international treaties and no power/use public
national or state laws can opinion to pressure
lead to prosecutions of governments to act;
offenders
4 max
Allow any other reasonable points.
Comparisons must be made to gain full credit.
[6]
16
(ii) description [1 max]:
city has by far the highest biomass per square km;
city has highest density of population;
city has lowest biodiversity as absolute number of species
and expressed as index;
i.e. a small number of common species are very abundant;
forest has lowest biomass;
and population;
forest biodiversity is high, but not as high as farmland;
i.e. a wide variety of species, none of which is very abundant;
farmland has much lower biomass than city, higher than forest;
farmland has lower population than city, higher than forest;
explanation:
city is a specialized environment that a few species can
exploit very well;
food from gardens, rubbish (garbage) etc. may be available
to support some species;
city has low habitat diversity/low number of ecological
niches;
forest is a multi-layered habitat, with a variety of plant
species, so habitat diversity is high;
farmland may have highest habitat diversity of all,
having both natural and artificial habitats;
some food from human sources may be available in
farmland (crops);
the diversity index of the three environments takes account
of the species diversity and the relative abundance of the
species, hence farmland highest; 4 max
Any other appropriate point.
At least two “explain” points needed to achieve full marks.
17
(iii) isolation of a small sub-group of the original population may
encourage/accelerate speciation;
through impossibility of interbreeding/exchange of genetic
material with original population;
and adaptations to new environment;
entirely new endemic species/unique species not found
elsewhere may appear;
e.g. unique finches/tortoises/iguanas on Galapagos Islands; 2 max
Any other reasonable point.
[11]
18
20. (a) number of native species in Continental Europe/Africa/Australia
is high because of large area;
number of native species is high in Continental Europe/Africa/
Australia because of wider range of habitats;
number of native species is high in Continental Europe/Africa/
Australia because of wider range of climate;
(Converse: NZ and Hawaii – smaller range of species because
of smaller area/range of habitats/climate)
number of native species high in Australia because of isolation
throughout evolutionary history;
number of native species low in NZ/Hawaii as few species can
colonise remote islands;
islands more liable to be colonised by introduced species;
high proportion/percentage of total species in NZ and Hawaii
are introduced;
because native species may be adapted to specialized environments
and are less resistant to competition; 4 max
Any other reasonable points
19
(c) name of species, e.g. dodo;
Factors will depend on example selected. E.g. for the dodo:
confined to small island/limited distribution (Mauritius);
small population;
useful source of food for visiting sailors;
extreme tameness;
large and conspicuous;
slow rate of reproduction;
habitat destruction;
competition with introduced organisms (e.g. pigs); 2 max
Any other reasonable points. Award [1] for two factors.
Note date (1600); be tolerant here. However, dinosaurs are not
acceptable.
(d) (i) name of area, e.g. Uluru (Ayers Rock, Northern Territory, Australia) 1
Always allow benefit of the doubt if you have not heard of the
protected area.
Google may be helpful.
(ii) Reasons will depend on area. For example, with respect to Uluru:
spectacular nature/aesthetic appeal of isolated monolith;
geological importance;
relatively undisturbed nature of surrounding habitats (at least
by western/European influences);
archaeological importance;
variety of organisms (plants, reptiles);
significance to indigenous peoples;
possibility of taking large areas into management without
disturbing longestablished ownerships; 3 max
20
(iii) Evaluation of success again will depend on area chosen.
E.g., with respect to Uluru:
designation as a World Heritage Site;
therefore international recognition of its importance;
freehold of land transferred to indigenous (Aboriginal) people;
Aboriginal people involved in management of the area;
recreational pressure/accommodation concentrated in
limited locations;
plants/animals/landforms protected;
well drafted protective legislation;
funds from entry fees from visitors used for maintenance
of area;
some conflict between western/recreational/tourist values
and Aboriginal sacred site values;
thus climbing of Rock still allowed, contrary to Aboriginal
preference;
and has resulted in a number of casualties (some fatal); 3 max
A simple description of management does not answer the
question.
Candidates must evaluate the success, this implies at least
some comment on the management practise used.
Example: “Burning and grazing by sheep are used on
some of the heathland nature reserves of the East Suffolk
Sandlings” is not sufficient.
“Burning and sheep grazing are sometimes successfully
used to maintain the traditional ‘open landscape’ character
of the heather-dominated plant communities on some of the
East Suffolk Sandlings nature reserves, and to maintain
their characteristic biota, some species of which are
locally endangered” – full marks.
[20]
21
(b) (i) rare;
vulnerable;
threatened;
endangered;
indeterminate/unknown;
extinct; 2 max
Award [2] for four correct, [1] for three or two correct and
[0] for one correct.
(ii) name of species: e.g. Sumatran tiger (no mark awarded for name)
reasons:
top predator and little energy reaches top of pyramid;
loss of habitat;
large area needed for viable population;
hunted because seen as danger to humans/livestock;
fragmentation of habitat makes breeding difficult;
high market value of body parts encourages poaching;
low genetic diversity with low numbers;
introduction of diseases; 3 max
Any other valid points.
Award [2 max] if name is not given.
22. (a) (i) genetic diversity represents the range of genetic material/
variability in a gene pool/population;
whereas habitat diversity represents the range of different
habitats/ecological niches in an ecosystem or biome
(based on glossary); 2 max
22
(ii) diversity at initial stage is low;
species diversity increases with colonisation through pioneer
stages and later stages of succession;
as plants grow, habitat diversity increases;
as habitat diversity increases, species diversity increases;
as productivity increases;
and food chains lengthen and insects and vertebrates colonise;
so a positive feedback link exists between habitat and species
diversity;
rise in populations and immigration may increase genetic diversity;
Any other reasonable point 4 max
(iv) the higher the area of the reserve, the higher the population;
the higher the population the higher the genetic index;
with one slight exception (Addo);
because a large population can generally “hold” a greater variety
of genes/variation than a small one;
the density of population varies from 6 ha per animal to over
200 ha per animal;
the density may vary with habitat/vegetation/climate;
might reflect difference in wildlife management/conservation/
hunting;
Any other reasonable point 5 max
23
(v) small, isolated populations contain a very limited range of genes;
and therefore cannot vary or evolve very much;
this increases the possibility that they will become extinct;
a larger area can contain larger, and therefore more stable
population;
other factors include the greater habitat and species diversity
that can be held in larger areas;
however, some argue that a number of small reserves are
preferable to a few large ones;
as the package of genes/habitats/species will be different;
and if one reserve is destroyed, others may survive; 2 max
Any other reasonable points Be tolerant, reward understanding
of ecological and conservation principles.
23. (a) (i) species diversity = number of species of organisms per unit;
habitat diversity = number of habitats/ecological niches per
unit area/within an ecosystem; 2
(ii) generally the higher the habitat diversity, the higher the
species diversity;
generally in a high mountain range the complexity of
vegetation decreases with altitude;
complex tropical forest communities at base provides
variety of ecological niches for many species;
or
less complex vegetation at higher altitudes provides fewer
ecological niches;
and thus can support fewer bird species; 2 max
Any other appropriate points
(b) (i) animals with tusks/large tusks are more likely to be killed for
24
their ivory;
natural selection results in the removal of “unfavourable”
genes from the population;
organisms carrying these genes tend to die before reaching
adulthood;
in modern Africa, genes for tusks/large tusks can be considered
unfavourable;
and thus animals with tusks/large tusks will be removed from
population/not pass their genes on to the next generation;
over time, therefore, fewer and fewer elephants will have
tusks; 2 max
Any other reasonable points
25
(iv) name of organism/conservation scheme [1 max];
details of management programme;
response will depend on organisms or scheme selected [3 max]
For example
Chuditch/Western Quoll;
the largest marsupial predator in Western Australia;
at the time of European settlement, Chuditch occurred in
approximately 70% of the continent;
by the late 1980s they had become endangered (population
less than 6000);
Perth Zoo has bred more than 300 Chuditch for release in
the last decade;
since the breeding programme began, Chuditch have been
downlisted from endangered to vulnerable (E); 4 max
Must have one evaluation point for full marks.
24. (a) (i) there may be more grassland habitat in total in the region;
commercial value of rainforests may be a disincentive for
protecting them;
grasslands may be easier to police than forests (e.g. against
poachers);
greater areas of forest may have already been destroyed
before protection programmes began;
grasslands may have more popular/“high status” organisms
(e.g. zebra, giraffe, large carnivores, etc.);
therefore may generate more tourist income per unit area; 2 max
Any other reasonable suggestions.
26
(ii) Calculations:
150 km 2
Grassland: × 100 = 50% (allow 45–55 %);
300 km 2
50 km 2
Rainforest: × 100 = 100% (allow 95–105 %); 2 max
50 km 2
27
25. (a) habitat diversity;
because different habitats tend to have different species;
so more habitats will generally include greater variety of species;
similarly, different species tend to have different genes;
so more species will generally include greater variety of genes;
Award [1 mark] each for any two explanations.
If “species diversity” is identified, no mark should be awarded for
it, but either of the last two marking points may be credited for [1]. 3 max
26. (a) (i) The Gaia philosophy envisages the entire planet
as a living, self regulating organism; 1
28
(ii) an open system exchanges energy and material,
a closed system exchanges energy but not material; 1
29
27. (a)
H eat H eat L ig h t H 2O
C O 2
O 2
T is s u e to o th e r
TR EE tr o p h ic le v e ls
L itte r to s o il
N u trie n ts
W a te r 3 max
Award [1] for tree in box, [1] for two matter flows and [1] for two
energy flows.
A c a c ia c a v e n s
O c to d o n d e g u / F e lis g u ig n a /
C h ile a n th o rn
ro d en t C h ile a n w ild c a t
tre e
Award [1] for appropriately labelled trophic levels, [2] for three
appropriate species or [1] for two appropriate species.
Do not accept rabbit, fox etc., unless there is some identifying
feature i.e. snowshoe hare and arctic fox.
30
(e) decomposers break down tissue;
release nutrients for reabsorption by producers;
form basis of decomposer food chain (which may be energetically
more important in some ecosystems than grazing food chains);
as chemosynthetic autotrophs may form basis of food chain;
through incomplete breakdown of organic material contribute
to build up of humus and improve nutrient retention capacity in soil;
are vital in nitrogen cycle; 2 max
31
(d) With reference to a named example, the following points
should be considered.
community support;
funding and resources;
legal status and policing;
adequate research; 3 max
No credit for naming the protected area. However, if a named
area is not specified award [2 max].
[8]
–2
29. (a) (i) temperate forest: 12.4 + 18.5 + 18.4 = 49.3 g m ;
–2
tropical forest: 52.6 + 41.2 + 28.2 = 122.0/122 g m ; 1
Both needed for [1].
49.3
(ii) temperate forest: × 100 = 6.0%;
821.1
112
tropical forest: × 100 = 57.8%; 1
211 .2
730.9
(b) temperate forest: × 100 = 89.0 %;
821.1
85.3
tropical forest: × 100 = 40.4 %;
211 .2
temperate forests have a larger percentage of nitrogen stored in soil; 2
Award [0] if temperate forest is stated without supporting calculations.
32
would be lost through clear-cutting;
climatic conditions in tropical rainforests would wash away
soil quicker/leach the soil of nutrients; 2 max
33
(iv) biomes will shift north and south from the equator;
e.g. North America wheat belt shifting north;
biomes shifting with altitude (e.g. tree line creeping upwards);
direct loss of low-lying biomes (e.g. mangrove swamps); 2 max
Accept other contributions to global warming related to
deforestation.
[20]
30. (a) (i) 1920 accept answers between 1910 and 1940 1
(ii) exponential growth/rate of increase accelerates over time/
J curve (provided understanding of rate is demonstrated) 1
(iii) crude birth rate – crude death rate;
+ 10; 2
34
over predation of indigenous species who have little (evolutionary)
defence against new predator;
out competition of indigenous species in same niche;
hybridization of indigenous species; 3 max
(b) (i) many species simply have not been discovered yet (large areas
of tropical forest/deep ocean unexplored for example);
rate of extinction is so rapid that some species become extinct
before we have discovered them;
small organisms hard to find/capture/identify; 1 max
35
(d) No mark for naming an ecosystem, but if no ecosystem is named
award [1 max].
e.g. Coral Reef off coast of Philippines
direct threats: [1 max]
aggressive fishing techniques e.g. dynamite fishing/cyanide fishing;
collecting shells/coral for souvenirs for tourist industry;
indirect threats: [1 max]
coral reefs then become more vulnerable to storm/cyclone
damage/disease/sea temperature changes (due to global warming);
siltation due to mangrove clearance and run-off from coast; 2 max
[9]
33. (a) from 1972 to 1975 both species show gradual increase trend;
from 1975 to 1976 moose numbers crash/fall;
wolf numbers continue to rise;
1978 to 1979 wolf numbers crash; 2 max
36
34. (a) as tractor use increase farm labour use goes down;
agriculture is becoming more mechanized;
agriculture may be more intensive;
less need for labour on farm;
farms becoming larger require more machinery;
farming/agriculture is becoming more technocentric; 2 max
(c) Award [1] for named agricultural system and associate impact.
e.g. prairie grassland US, loss of biodiversity;
e.g. Norfolk grasslands UK, loss of marshland from drainage;
e.g. slash and burn subsistence farming, loss of forest habitat;
e.g. extensive cattle farming east-Africa, introduction of disease; 1 max
(d) soil has become more valuable as it has become more scarce;
increasingly seen as a resource requiring protection with special
techniques e.g. shelter and salinisation of soil resource due to
poor management;
decline in soil quality due to poor management e.g. salinisation
(over irrigation);
loss of soil due to soil erosion;
soil degradation and lowered productivity; 2 max
Accept other reasonable responses.
[7]
35. (a) high profile/charismatic species catch public attention both nationally
and internationally (e.g. tiger – India);
however, species based conservation favours charismatic organisms
and is less successful in saving “non cuddly” species;
saving a named species requires preserving the animal’s habitat this
benefits all other organisms in that habitat;
however a species can be artificially preserved (e.g. in a zoo) whilst
its natural habitat is destroyed (e.g. Giant Panda); 3 max
Award any three of the above points [1] each or any other suitable
suggestions.
37
(b) area A: [1 max]
fragmented and small with a large perimeter area ratio/large edge
effect so lots of disturbance;
fragmented so difficult migration between fragments;
small size may limit species contained/limit population sizes;
Accept other reasonable responses.
area B: [1 max]
large perimeter area ratio/relatively small edge effect so less
disturbance;
large size promotes high biodiversity;
large size so good for large vertebrates/top carnivores/large
species populations;
Accept other reasonable responses.
area C: [1 max]
as large as B but dissected by a road which acts as a barrier to species
migration;
road increases edge effect some more disturbance;
road allows easier access to the interior of reserve for monitoring;
road gives easier access for poachers;
some evaluative element is required (i.e. how the characteristic
relates to the ecosystem in a positive or negative way); 3
Accept other reasonable responses.
(c) (i)
lid
g ro u n d le v e l
p la s tic c u p
b a it
(d e a d in s e c t) 2
Award [1] for the diagram and [1] for up to three labels.
Accept pitfalls designed to collect larger species.
38
(d) due to the process of plate tectonics the Earth’s surface has
gradually broken up and drifted apart over many millions of years;
this process has allowed groups of organisms to become isolated
and evolve along different paths dictated by their new
surrounding and environmental conditions/plate movement not
only isolates groups but also subjects them to new climates and
environmental conditions; 2
Accept other reasonable responses.
[14]
36. (a) large animals require relatively large space for breeding/foraging/
hunting/ territoriality;
the area often needs to be large enough to limit disturbance/include
buffer zones;
the area needs to be large enough to minimize the chance of animals
wandering outside the reserve and becoming targets for hunters;
if reserves are too small, viable populations of large animals are
not sustainable; 3 max
39
37. (a) stops organic residues entering streams and causing pollution/eutrophication; 1
(b) (i) reducing lawn size – lawns are restricted to grass species and
succession cannot occur as they are cut regularly;
allowing plants and trees to grow alongside streams will increase
the range of habitats for insect/bird species;
more food/nutrients provided for species; 2
Accept any other reasonable responses.
Award [0] if no reason given.
(c) removing grass cuttings takes nutrients away from the soil, so
there will be a net loss of nutrients;
natural fertilizers less likely to contain harmful toxins which
may build up in species (biomagnification);
cheaper;
a way of reducing overall waste/resources/energy used;
a more sustainable strategy;
less likely to cause eutophication than artificial fertilizers;
artificial fertilizers lead to release of greenhouse gases as they
are produced;
natural fertilizers may contribute positively to soil structure; 2 max
[7]
(iv) Strengths:
40
simple to interpret/quantitative to some extent/pictorial so
easy to compare with others;
Limitations:
no indication of quantities as numeric values/simplistic; 2
(c) found in parts of the world with high population density so pressure
on the land to remove forest and grow food;
it takes a long time to recover from logging/destruction;
have biological hotspots with high biodiversity so many species
affected;
valuable timber is removed and so forest damaged; 2 max
Do not accept acid rain (Brazil is low for acid rain).
Do not accept tourism/ecotourism unless tied to impacts on habitat(s).
Credit answers which either address reasons why this ecosystem is
intrinsically fragile or reasons why people might destroy the habitat.
[8]
41