Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fabrication and Application of Micro/Nano Coatings by Convective Assembly
Fabrication and Application of Micro/Nano Coatings by Convective Assembly
Fabrication and Application of Micro/Nano Coatings by Convective Assembly
Orlin D. Velev
Department of Chemical Engineering
North Carolina State University
Peter M. Tessier
Colloidal Self-assembly:
Problems
• The particles move in chaotic world dominated by Brownian
motion and interactions that are often difficult to control
• Defects are nearly omnipresent
• Colloids are not readily compatible with conventional photonic
and electronic materials and fabrication processes
• The assembly times are too slow for practical technologies
• The conventional and some unconventional lithographic methods
are pretty good and evolve in 3D
• So far, very few practical results have come from the hyped
promises
Rationale for research in nanocoating
applications
¾ Forget the full photonic bandgap
¾ Find simple, cost-effective applications - e.g. large scale coatings
¾ Find applications where nanoparticle structures work better than
microfabricated ones – e.g. SERS substrates
¾ Look for new functionality
β Je φ
Vw =
hk (1 − ε ) (1 − φ )
Denkov, Velev et al.,
Nature, 361, 26 (1993) Precise control of thickness
Langmuir, 8, 3183 (1992) possible via meniscus speed
and evaporation
Convective assembly by dip-coating
Requires:
- long times scales
~ many hours Æ days (even weeks) Jiang et al. (Colvin),
Chem. Mater. 11, 2132
- large quantities
(1999).
(wasteful Æ coats container too)
Drawbacks & Solutions
Conventional convective
Possible improvements
assembly limitations
Develop operational
Control is required… process control diagrams
- Low angle
Light transmission
1cm
Modeling the process of colloidal crystal
film deposition
110
visually confirmed hcp monolayers
100
Fitted monolayer data to
90
the equation to obtain K
80 φ - vol. fraction of particles
Kφ ε - void fraction in crystal
70 vW = vC =
h (1 − ε )(1 − φ )
vw (μm/s)
60
50
JE vw
40
h
30
vc
20
For RH = 30%
10
K = 109 ± 9 m2/s
0
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40
100
90
80
70
vw (μm/s)
60 Submonolayers
50
40
30 Multilayers
20
10
0
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40
20 μm 5 μm 5 μm 5 μm
a b c d
Structural transitions in 2D colloidal crystal films
of varying thickness
Schematic follows Pieranski et al. (1983)
Air – Water
Interface
Substrate
1≥
2ϒ
2≥
2ϒ
3≥
Conclusions from process diagram
Catalytic
Uniform micro/nano-
porous supports
Dielectric sphere crystal application:
Anti-reflective coatings
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/
hbase/phyopt/antiref.html
Catalytic
Uniform micro/nano-
porous supports
Gold nanoparticle deposition
15 nm
lS vW
B) 40 μm/s ∝
lC vC
C) 20 μm/s
D) 4 μm/s
Gold nanoparticle coatings: Optical Density
15 nm vw
vw
c b a
a) 40 μm/s
b) 20 μm/s
c) 4 μm/s
Gold nanoparticle coatings: Summary
Absorbance scales inversely with
2-3 wt % gold deposition speed and is related to
electric conductance
15 nm vw
vw
c b a
a) 40 μm/s
b) 20 μm/s
c) 4 μm/s
Modifying nanocoatings by heat treatment
Reduced energy requirements for nanocoating processing
Nanoparticles have lower melting pts. (predicted by Kelvin equation):
p ( s ) 2γVM Pawlow ⎛ ⎡ ⎛ ρs ⎞ ⎤
2/3
⎞
ln r = T (d ) = TM , bulk ⎜1 − 4
⎢γ s − γ l ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ ⎥ ⎟
⎜ ρ s d ΔH M ⎟
p0 ( s ) RTr expansion
⎝ ⎢⎣ ⎝ ρ l ⎠ ⎥⎦ ⎠
Coating spectra
Bulk gold sol Heating time =
spectrum
(a.u.)
Prevo et al.,
submitted
(2004).
Effect of heating on film structure
Heating
Images obtained via SEM (Large scale = 1μm, inset scale = 100 nm)
Deposition of biomolecule nanocoatings:
Ferritin
100
99.5 Ferritin
99
98.5
% Transmission
98 12nm 10nm
97.5
95
94.5
94
400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800
Wavelength, nm
Combining convective
deposition and dip-
coating
Ferritin nanocoatings
– Method works with large protein molecules
– Can be combined with dip-coating
– Solid films of magnetic nanodomains obtained
“Inside-out" templating:
Structured porous materials via colloidal
crystals
Latex microspheres Silica
Velev et al.
Nature, 389, 447 (1997). 1
μm
Velev et al.
Nature, 389, 447 (1997).
Nature, 401, 548 (1999).
Adv. Mater., 12, 531 (2000).
“Inside-out" templating:
Structured metallic films via colloidal crystals
Single-step deposition
Evaporation Porosity on two length scales
1. Aggregated Au nanoparticles (~12 nm)
Glass plate
2. Aggregated latex microspheres (650 nm)
Gold Latex
nanoparticles microspheres
Velev et al.,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 122, 9554 (2000).
Adv. Mater, 13, 396 (2001). Nanostructured gold film (SEM)
“Inside-out" templating:
Structured metallic films via colloidal crystals
Au nanoparticles templated by 3D
Metal deposition on microspheres colloidal crystals
Incorporating SERS substrates in
flow microchamber
Raman spectrometer
probe
Sample out to
Sample in peristaltic pump
• Changing pH without
adsorbing new CN- leads to
strong enhancement of the
peak intensity
0.1 M HNO3
• Process can be repeated
multiple times by flowing
different solutions
0.1 M HNO3
SERS on-line measurements: precise estimate of LOD
5
Normalized Peak Area
Kc
θ=
1
1 10 100 1000 10000
K c +1
Cyanide Conc. (ppb)
Effect of thickness
Effect of
microporosity
Effect of ordering
Effect of
nanoporosity
Effect of substrate structure on SERS signal
2500 Ordered
2000
Disordered
I (a.u)
1500
Non-templated
1000
75 ppb NaCN in 0.1M NaOH
dei-water
500
0 1 2 3
No increase in performance by
adding more material
• The structures can be integrated into flow chambers for continuous sensing
• The samples are very reproducible and require very small amount of metal
Additional information:
odvelev@unity.ncsu.edu
http://crystal.che.ncsu.edu