Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 5 Heat
Chapter 5 Heat
Chapter 5 Heat
The preceding chapters have considered the mechanism and calculation of conduction
heat transfer. Convection was considered only insofar as it related to the boundary
conditions imposed on a conduction problem. We now wish to examine the methods
of calculating convection heat transfer and, in particular, the ways of predicting the
value of the convection heat-transfer coefficient h.
𝑑𝑢
𝜏 = 𝜇 𝑑𝑦 5.1
The region of flow that develops from the leading edge of the plate in which the
effects of viscosity are observed is called the boundary layer. Some arbitrary point is
used to designate the y position where the boundary layer ends; this point is usually
chosen as the y coordinate where the velocity becomes 99 percent of the free-stream
value.
𝑢∞ 𝑥 𝜌𝑢∞ 𝑥
𝜐
= 𝜇
= 𝑅𝑒 > 5 ∗ 105 (transiant)
𝑅𝑒 ≤ 5 ∗ 105 (laminar)
Where
𝑢∞ = free stream velocity, m/s.
𝑥 = distance from leading edge, m.
𝜇
𝜐 = 𝜌 =kinematic viscosity, m2/s.
𝑢∞ 𝑥
𝑅𝑒𝑥 = 𝜐
5.2
Figure 5.1: Sketch showing different boundary-layer flow regimes on a flat plate.
Figure 5.4 Elemental control volume for force balance on laminar boundary layer.
𝜕𝑢 𝜕𝑣
+ =0 5.3
𝜕𝑥 𝜕𝑦
The momentum equation of the laminar boundary layer with constant properties.
𝜕𝑢 𝜕𝑢 𝜕2 𝑢 𝜕𝑝
𝜌 �𝑢 +𝑣 � = 𝜇 𝜕𝑦2 − 𝜕𝑥 5.4
𝜕𝑥 𝜕𝑦
Figure 5.5: Elemental control volume for integral momentum analysis of laminar boundary
layer.
The velosity profile of the stream in x-direction within the baundary layer is given by:
𝑢 3𝑦 1 𝑦 3
𝑢∞
= 2 𝛿 − 2 �𝛿 � 5.6
𝜕𝑇 𝜕𝑇 𝜕2 𝑇 𝜇 𝜕𝑢 2
𝑢 𝜕𝑥 + 𝑣 𝜕𝑦 = 𝛼 𝜕𝑦 2 + 𝜌𝑐 �𝜕𝑦� 5.7
𝑝
𝜕𝑇 𝜕𝑇 𝜕2 𝑇
𝑢 𝜕𝑥 + 𝑣 𝜕𝑦 = 𝛼 𝜕𝑦 2 5.8
There is a striking similarity between equation 5.8 and the momentum equation for
costant pressure,
𝜕𝑢 𝜕𝑢 𝜕2 𝑢
𝑢 𝜕𝑥 + 𝑣 𝜕𝑦 = 𝛼 𝜕𝑦 2 5.9
Example 5.1: Mass Flow and Boundary-Layer Thickness -3
Air at 27◦C and 1 atm flows over a flat plate at a speed of 2 m/s. Calculate the
boundary-layer thickness at distances of 20 cm and 40 cm from the leading edge of
the plate. Calculate the mass flow that enters the boundary layer between 𝑥 = 20 cm
and 𝑥 = 40 cm. The viscosity of air at 27◦C is 1.85×10−5 kg/m· s. Assume unit depth
in the z direction.
Solution
The density of air is calculated from
𝑝 1.0132∗105
𝜌 = 𝑅𝑇 = (287)(27+273) = 1.177 kg/m3
𝑢∞ 𝑥
𝑅𝑒𝑥 = 𝜐
𝑢∞ 𝑥 𝜌𝑢∞ 𝑥 1.177∗2∗0.2
At 𝑥 = 20 𝑐𝑚: 𝑅𝑒𝑥 = 𝜐
= 𝜇
= 1.85×10−5
= 25,448
𝜌𝑢∞ 𝑥 1.177∗2∗0.4
At 𝑥 = 40 𝑐𝑚: 𝑅𝑒𝑥 = 𝜇
= 1.85×10−5
= 50,896
4.64∗0.2
At 𝑥 = 20 𝑐𝑚, 𝛿 = 1 = 0.00582 m.
(25488) �2
4.64∗0.4
At 𝑥 = 40 𝑐𝑚, 𝛿 = 1 = 0.00823 m.
(50896) �2
To calculate the mass flow that enters the boundary layer from the free stream
between 𝑥 = 20 cm and 𝑥 = 40 cm, we simply take the difference between the mass
flow in the boundary layer at these two x positions. At any x position the mass flow in
the boundary layer is given by the integral
𝛿
𝑚̇ = ∫0 𝜌𝑢 𝑑𝑦
3𝑦 1 𝑦 3
𝑢 = 𝑢∞ 2 𝛿 − 2 �𝛿 �
𝛿 3𝑦 1 𝑦 3 5
𝑚̇ = ∫0 𝜌𝑢∞ − � � 𝑑𝑦 = 𝜌𝑢∞ 𝛿
2𝛿 2 𝛿 8
5 5
∆𝑚̇ = 8 𝜌𝑢∞ (𝛿40 − 𝛿20 ) = 8 (1.177 ∗ 2(0.00823 − 0.00582) = 0.00354 kg/s
5.4 Thermal boundary layer
Just as the hydrodynamic boundary layer was defined as that region of the flow where
viscous forces are felt, a thermal boundary layer may be defined as that region where
temperature gradients are present in the flow. These temperature gradients would
result from a heat-exchange process between the fluid and the wall.
Consider the system shown in Figure 5.6. The temperature of the wall is 𝑇𝑤 , the
temperature of the fluid outside the thermal boundary layer is 𝑇∞ , and the thickness of
the thermal boundary layer is designated as 𝛿𝑡 . At the wall, the velocity is zero, and
the heat transfer into the fluid takes place by conduction. Thus the local heat flux per
unit area is:
𝑞 𝜕𝑇
𝐴
= −𝑘 𝜕𝑦� 5.10
𝑤𝑎𝑙𝑙
𝜕𝑇
−𝑘 �
𝜕𝑦 𝑤𝑎𝑙𝑙
ℎ= 5.12
(𝑇𝑤 −𝑇∞ )
Then we need only find the temperature gradiant at the wall to evaluate ℎ. Therefore,
the temperature distribution is:
𝜃 𝑇−𝑇𝑤 3 𝑦 1 𝑦 3
𝜃∞
=𝑇 = 2 𝛿 − 2 �𝛿 � 5.13
∞ −𝑇𝑤 𝑡 𝑡
The thermal boundary layer can calculated from the equation below:
1�
3� 3
𝛿𝑡 1 −1 𝑥𝑜 4
= 1.026 𝑃𝑟 �3 �1 −�𝑥� � 5.14
𝛿
Where the Prandtl number is dimensionless when a consistent set of units is used:
𝜇
𝜐 �𝜌 𝑐𝑝 𝜇
𝑃𝑟 = 𝛼 = 𝑘� = 5.16
𝜌𝑐𝑝 𝑘
The local convective heat transfer coefficient is calculated from the equation as
below:
−1�
1� 3� 3
1 𝑢 2 𝑥𝑜 4
ℎ𝑥 = 0.332𝑘 𝑃𝑟 �3 � 𝜐𝑥∞� �1 −�𝑥� � 5.17
𝑥
The equation may be nondimensionalized by multiplying both sides by , producing the
𝑘
dimensionless group on the left side,
ℎ𝑥 𝑥
𝑁𝑢𝑥 = 𝑘
5.18
called the Nusselt number afterWilhelm Nusselt, who made significant contributions to the
theory of convection heat transfer. Finally,
−1�
3� 3
1 1 𝑥𝑜 4
𝑁𝑢𝑥 = 0.332 𝑃𝑟 �3 𝑅𝑒𝑥 �2 �1 −�𝑥� � 5.19
or, for the plate heated over its entire length, 𝑥𝑜 = 0 and
1� 1
𝑁𝑢𝑥 = 0.332 𝑃𝑟 3 𝑅𝑒𝑥 �2 0.6 < 𝑃𝑟 > 50 5.20 a
Equation (5.20 a) is applicable to fluids having Prandtl numbers between about 0.6
and 50. It would not apply to fluids with very low Prandtl numbers like liquid metals
or to high- Prandtl-number fluids like heavy oils or silicones. For a very wide range of
Prandtl numbers, Churchill and Ozoe have correlated a large amount of data to give
the following relation for laminar flow on an isothermal flat plate:
1 1
0.3387𝑅𝑒𝑥 �2 𝑃𝑟 �3
𝑁𝑢𝑥 = 1� 𝑅𝑒𝑥 𝑃𝑟 > 100 5.20 b
2 4
0.0468 �3
�1+� � �
𝑃𝑟
Equations (5.17), (5.19), and (5.20 a) express the local values of the heat-transfer
coefficient in terms of the distance from the leading edge of the plate and the fluid
properties. For the case where 𝑥𝑜 = 0 the average heat-transfer coefficient and
Nusselt number may be obtained by integrating over the length of the plate:
𝐿
∫ ℎ𝑥 𝑑𝑥
ℎ� = 0 𝐿 = 2ℎ𝑥=𝐿 5.21
∫0 𝑑𝑥
assuming the heated section is at the constant temperature 𝑇𝑤 . For the plate heated
over the entire length,
�
����𝐿 = ℎ𝐿 = 2𝑁𝑢𝑥=𝐿
𝑁𝑢 5.22
𝑘
Or
� 1
����𝐿 = ℎ𝐿 = 0.664𝑅𝑒 �2 𝑃𝑟 1�3
𝑁𝑢 5.23
𝑘 𝐿
Where:
𝜌𝑢∞ 𝐿
𝑅𝑒𝐿 = 𝜇
5.24
For a plate where heating starts at 𝑥 = 𝑥𝑜 , it can be shown that the average heat
transfer coefficient can be expressed as
3�
𝑥 4
1−� 𝑜�𝐿 �
ℎ�𝑥𝑜 −𝐿 = ℎ𝑥=𝐿 �2𝐿 𝐿−𝑥 �
𝑜
In this case, the total heat transfer for the plate would be
The foregoing analysis was based on the assumption that the fluid properties were
constant throughout the flow. When there is an appreciable variation between wall
and free-stream conditions, it is recommended that the properties be evaluated at the
so-called film temperature 𝑇𝑓 , defined as the arithmetic mean between the wall and
free-stream temperature,
𝑇𝑤 +𝑇∞
𝑇𝑓 = 5.25
2
The above analysis has considered the laminar heat transfer from an isothermal
surface. In many practical problems the surface heat flux is essentially constant, and
the objective is to find the distribution of the plate-surface temperature for given
fluid-flow conditions. For the constant-heat-flux case it can be shown that the local
Nusselt number is given by
1� 1
𝑁𝑢𝑥 = 0.453 𝑅𝑒𝑥 2 𝑃𝑟 �3 5.26
which may be expressed in terms of the wall heat flux and temperature difference as
𝑞 𝑥
𝑁𝑢𝑥 = 𝑘(𝑇 𝑤−𝑇 5.27
𝑤 ∞)
Where:
𝑞𝑤 : heat flux, W/m2
𝑞
Note that the heat flux 𝑞𝑤 = 𝐴 is assumed constant over the entire plate surface.
1 𝐿 1 𝐿 𝑞𝑤 𝑥
�����������
𝑇𝑤 − 𝑇∞ = 𝐿 ∫0 (𝑇𝑤 − 𝑇∞ )𝑑𝑥 = 𝐿 ∫0 𝑘𝑁𝑢 𝑑𝑥
𝑥
𝑞𝑤 𝐿�𝑘
�����������
𝑇𝑤 − 𝑇∞ = 1 5.28
� 1
0.6795𝑅𝑒𝐿 2 𝑃𝑟 �3
3
𝑞𝑤 = ℎ𝑥=𝐿 (𝑇𝑤 − 𝑇∞ )
2
For constant heat flux case and the properties evaluated at the film temperature:
1 1
0.4637𝑅𝑒𝑥 �2 𝑃𝑟 �3
𝑁𝑢𝑥 = 1� 𝑅𝑒𝑥 𝑃𝑟 > 100 5.29
2 4
0.0207 �3
�1+� � �
𝑃𝑟
Example 5.1: -3
Air at 27◦C and 1 atm flows over a flat plate at a speed of 2 m/s. Calculate the
boundary-layer thickness at distances of 20 cm and 40 cm from the leading edge of
the plate. Calculate the mass flow that enters the boundary layer between 𝑥 = 20 cm
and 𝑥 = 40 cm. The viscosity of air at 27◦C is 1.85×10−5 kg/m· s. Assume unit depth
in the z direction.
Example 5.2:Isothermal Flat Plate Heated Over Entire Length XAMPLE 5-4
For the flow system in Example 5.1 assume that the plate is heated over its entire
length to a temperature of 60◦C. Calculate the heat transferred in (a) the first 20 cm of
the plate and (b) the first 40 cm of the plate.
Solution
𝑇𝑤 +𝑇∞
𝑇𝑓 = , 𝑇∞ = 27˚𝐶, 𝑢∞ = 2 m/s, 𝑇𝑤 =60˚C
2
60+27
𝑇𝑓 = 2
= 43.5 + 273 = 316.5 K
At 𝒙 = 𝟒𝟎 𝒄𝒎
𝑢∞ 𝑥 2∗0.4
𝑅𝑒𝑥 = 𝜐
= 17.36∗10−6 = 46082
ℎ𝑥 𝑥
𝑁𝑢𝑥 = 𝑘
1� 1 1� 1�
𝑁𝑢𝑥 = 0.332 𝑃𝑟 3 𝑅𝑒𝑥 �2 = 0.332 (0.7) 3 ∗ (46082) 2 = 63.28
𝑘 0.02749
ℎ𝑥 = 𝑁𝑢𝑥 𝑥 = 63.28 ∗ 0.4
= 4.349 W/m2. ˚C
The average value of the heat-transfer coefficient is twice this value, or
𝑞𝑤 𝐿�𝑘
�����������
𝑇𝑤 − 𝑇∞ = 1
� 1
0.6795𝑅𝑒𝐿 2 𝑃𝑟 �3
1000 0.6
� �� �0.02624�
�����������
𝑇𝑤 − 𝑇∞ = 0.62
1 1 = 241.85 ˚C
0.6795(1.88∗105 ) �2 (0.708) �3
𝑇𝑤 = 241.85 + 27 = 268.85 ˚C
1000 0.6
� �� �0.035 �
�����������
𝑇𝑤 − 𝑇∞ = 0.62
1 1 = 243.6 ˚C
0.6795(1.06∗105 ) �2 (0.687) �3
𝑞 𝑥
𝑁𝑢𝑥 = 𝑘(𝑇 𝑤−𝑇
𝑤 ∞)
𝑤 𝑞 𝑥
𝑇𝑤 − 𝑇∞ = 𝑘𝑁𝑢
𝑥
𝑤 𝑞 𝑥
𝑇𝑤 − 𝑇∞ = 𝑘𝑁𝑢
𝑥
1� 1
𝑁𝑢𝑥 = 0.453 𝑅𝑒𝑥 2 𝑃𝑟 �3
𝑞𝑤 𝑥
𝑇𝑤 − 𝑇∞ = 1 1
(𝑘)0.453 𝑅𝑒𝑥 �2 𝑃𝑟 �3
At 𝑥 = 𝐿
𝑞𝑤 𝐿
𝑇𝑤 − 𝑇∞ = 1 1
(𝑘)0.453 𝑅𝑒𝐿 �2 𝑃𝑟 �3
1000 0.6
� �� �0.035 �
0.62
𝑇𝑤 − 𝑇∞ = 1 1 = 365.9 ˚C
0.453 (1.06∗105 ) �2 (0.687) �3
At 𝑥 = 𝐿
𝑢∞ 𝐿 20∗0.2
𝑅𝑒𝐿 = 𝜐
= 18.23∗10−6 = 2.194 ∗ 105
−1�
1� 3� 3
1� 20 2 0.1 4
ℎ𝐿 = 0.332 ∗ 0.02814( 0.7) �18.23∗10−6 ∗0.2� �1
3 − �0.2� �
ℎ𝐿 = 26.253 W/m2.˚C.
3�
𝑥 4
1−� 𝑜�𝐿 �
ℎ�𝑥𝑜 −𝐿 = ℎ𝑥=𝐿 �2𝐿 𝐿−𝑥 �
𝑜
3�
1−� �0.2� 0.1 4
ℎ�𝑥𝑜 −𝐿 = 26.253 �2(0.2) 0.2−0.1 �
𝑞 = ℎ�𝑥𝑜 −𝐿 (𝐿 − 𝑥𝑜 ) ∗ 𝑤(𝑇𝑤 − 𝑇∞ )
𝑇𝑤 +𝑇∞ 60+20
𝑇𝑓 = = = 40 + 273 = 313 K
2 2
1 1 1 1
0.3387𝑅𝑒𝑥 �2 𝑃𝑟 �3 0.3387(1000) �2 (2870) �3
𝑁𝑢𝑥 = 1� = 1� = 152.2
2 4 2 4
0.0468 �3 0.0468 �3
�1+� � � �1+� � �
𝑃𝑟 2870
𝑘 0.144
ℎ𝑥 = 𝑁𝑢𝑥 𝑥 = 152.2 ∗ 0.2
= 109.6 W/m2. ˚C
The shear stress at the wall may be expressed in terms of a friction coefficient 𝐶𝑓 :
2
𝜌𝑢∞
𝜏𝑤 = 𝐶𝑓 5.30
2
The exact solution of the boundary-layer equations yields
𝐶𝑓𝑥 −1�
= 0.332𝑅𝑒𝑥 2 5.31
2
1� 1
𝑁𝑢𝑥 = 0.332 𝑃𝑟 3 𝑅𝑒𝑥 �2 5.20 a
𝑁𝑢𝑥 ℎ𝑥 −2� −1
= 𝜌𝑐 = 0.332 𝑃𝑟 3 𝑅𝑒𝑥 �2
𝑅𝑒𝑥 𝑃𝑟 𝑝 𝑢∞
ℎ𝑥
𝑆𝑡𝑥 = 𝜌𝑐
𝑝 𝑢∞
So that
2� 1�
𝑆𝑡𝑥 𝑃𝑟 3 = 0.332𝑅𝑒𝑥 2 5.32
Upon comparing Equations (5.31) and (5.32), we note that the right sides are alike
except for a difference of about 3 percent in the constant, which is the result of the
approximate nature of the integral boundary-layer analysis. We recognize this
approximation
And write
2� 𝐶𝑓𝑥
𝑆𝑡𝑥 𝑃𝑟 3 = 0.6 < 𝑝𝑟 < 60 5.33
2
Equation (5.33), called the Reynolds-Colburn analogy, expresses the relation between
fluid friction and heat transfer for laminar flow on a flat plate. The heat-transfer
coefficient thus could be determined by making measurements of the frictional drag
on a plate under conditions in which no heat transfer is involved.
It turns out that Equation (5.33) can also be applied to turbulent flow over a flat plate
and in a modified way to turbulent flow in a tube. It does not apply to laminar tube
flow.
𝑇𝑤 +𝑇∞
𝑇𝑓 = , 𝑇∞ = 27˚𝐶, 𝑢∞ = 2 m/s, 𝑇𝑤 =60˚C, 𝑐𝑝 = 1.006 Kj/kg. ˚C.
2
60+27
𝑇𝑓 = 2
= 43.5 + 273 = 316.5 K
𝑝 1.0132∗105
𝜌 = 𝑅𝑇 = (287)(316.5) = 1.115 kg/m3
For 40 cm length
From example 5.2
ℎ� = 8.698
�
� = ℎ =
𝑆𝑡
8.698
= 3.88 ∗ 10−3
𝜌𝑐 𝑢 1.115∗1006∗2
𝑝 ∞
����
𝐶𝑓
� 𝑃𝑟 2�3 = 3.88 ∗ 10−3 (0.7)2�3 = 3.06 ∗ 10−3
= 𝑆𝑡
2
2
𝜌𝑢∞
�𝜏��� ���
𝑤 = 𝐶𝑓 = 3.06 ∗ 10−3 ∗ 1.115 ∗ (2)2 = 0.0136 N/m2
2
𝐷 = �𝜏���𝐿
𝑤 = 0.0136 ∗ 0.4 = 5.44 N.m
5.6 Turbulent-Boundary-Layer Heat Transfer
Schlichting has surveyed experimental measurements of friction coefficients for
turbulent flow on flat plates. We present the results of that survey so that they may be
employed in the calculation of turbulent heat transfer with the fluid-friction–heat-
transfer analogy. The local skin-friction coefficient is given by
1
−
𝐶𝑓𝑥 = 0.0592𝑅𝑒𝑥 5 5 ∗ 105 < 𝑅𝑒𝑥 < 107 5.34
𝐶𝑓𝑥 = 0.370(log 𝑅𝑒𝑥 )−2.584 107 < 𝑅𝑒𝑥 < 109 5.35
The average-friction coefficient for a flat plate with a laminar boundary layer up to
𝑅𝑒crit and turbulent thereafter can be calculated from
0.455 𝐴
𝐶𝑓̅ = (log 𝑅𝑒 2.584
− 𝑅𝑒 𝑅𝑒𝐿 < 109 for laminar and turbulent 5.36
𝐿) 𝐿
where the constant A depends on 𝑅𝑒crit in accordance with Table 5.1. A somewhat
simpler formula can be obtained for lower Reynolds numbers as
0.074 𝐴
𝐶𝑓̅ = 1 − 𝑅𝑒 𝑅𝑒𝐿 < 107 5.37
𝑅𝑒𝐿 5 𝐿
𝐶𝑓
𝑆𝑡 𝑃𝑟 2/3 = 2
we obtain the local turbulent heat transfer as:
1
𝑆𝑡𝑥 𝑃𝑟 2/3 = 0.0296 𝑅𝑒𝑥 −5 5 ∗ 105 < 𝑅𝑒𝑥 < 107 5.38
Or
𝑆𝑡𝑥 𝑃𝑟 2/3 = 0.185(log 𝑅𝑒𝑥 )−2.584 107 < 𝑅𝑒𝑥 < 109 5.39
The average heat transfer over the entire laminar-turbulent boundary layer is
� 𝑃𝑟 2/3 = 𝐶𝑓
𝑆𝑡 5.40
2
For 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑡 = 5 × 105 and 𝑅𝑒𝐿 < 107 , Equation (5.37) can be used to obtain
1�
� 𝑃𝑟 2/3 = 0.037𝑅𝑒 −
𝑆𝑡 5
− 871𝑅𝑒𝐿−1 5.41
𝐿
����
� = 𝑁𝑢
𝑆𝑡 (𝑅𝑒 Pr)𝐿
1
ℎ𝐿
����
𝑁𝑢𝐿 = 𝑘 = 𝑃𝑟 3 (0.037𝑅𝑒𝐿0.8 − 871) 5.42
For higher Reynolds numbers the friction coefficient from Equation (5.36) may be used, so that
For 107 < 𝑅𝑒𝐿 < 109 and 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑡 = 5 × 105
�𝐿 1
ℎ
𝑁𝑢𝐿 = 𝑘
= [0.228𝑅𝑒𝐿 (log 𝑅𝑒𝐿 )−2.584 − 871]𝑃𝑟 3 5.43
1
𝜇
����
𝑁𝑢𝐿 = 0.036𝑃𝑟 0.43 (𝑅𝑒𝐿0.8 − 9200) � 𝜇∞ �
4
5.44
𝑤
Example 5.8:
Turbulent-Boundary-Layer Thickness
Calculate the turbulent-boundary-layer thickness at the end of the plate for Example
5.7, assuming that it develops (a) from the leading edge of the plate and (b) from the
transition point at 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑡 = 5 ∗ 105 .
Solution
Since we have already calculated the Reynolds number as 𝑅𝑒𝐿 = 1.553 × 106 , it is a
simple matter
to insert this value in Equations (5.46) and (5.47) along with 𝑥 = 𝐿 = 0.75 m to give
0.381𝑥 (0.381)(0.75)
(a) 𝛿 = 1 = 1 = 0.0165 m= 16.5 mm
𝑅𝑒𝑥5 (1.553∗106 )5
1
−
(b) 𝛿 = �0.381𝑅𝑒𝑥 5 − 10,256𝑅𝑒𝑥−1 � 𝑥
1
𝛿 = �(0.381)(1.553 ∗ 106 )−5 − (10,256)(1.553 ∗ 106 )−1 � ∗ 0.75 = 9.9 mm
𝑢𝑚 𝐷ℎ
𝑅𝑒𝐷ℎ = > 2300 5.48
𝑣
Where
4𝐴𝑐
𝐷ℎ = 𝑃
Figure 5.7 Velocity profile for (a) laminar flow in a tube and (b) turbulent tube flow.
Mean velocity
The value of the mean velocity 𝑢𝑚 in a tube is determined from
The velocity distribution for the fully developed flow in tube may be written
𝑢 𝑟2
=1− 5.51
𝑢𝑜 𝑟𝑜2
The temperature distribution in the tube can calculated from the equation below:
1 𝜕𝑇 𝑢𝑜 𝑟𝑜2 𝑟 2 1 𝑟 4
𝑇 − 𝑇𝑐 = �� � − � � � 5.52
𝛼 𝜕𝑥 4 𝑟𝑜 4 𝑟𝑜
Where:
𝑇𝑐 : center temperature.
𝑞
= ℎ(𝑇𝑤 − 𝑇𝑏 ) (local heat flux) 5.53
𝐴
Where
𝑇𝑤 :is the wall temperature and
𝑇𝑏 :is the so-called bulk temperature, or energy-average fluid temperature across the
tube, which may be calculated from
𝑟0
∫ 𝜌2𝜋𝑟𝑑𝑟𝑢𝑐𝑝 𝑇
𝑇𝑏 = 𝑇� = 0𝑟0 5.54
∫0 𝜌2𝜋𝑟𝑑𝑟𝑢𝑐𝑝
7 𝑢𝑜 𝑟𝑜2 𝜕𝑇
𝑇𝑏 = 𝑇𝑐 + 96 5.55
𝛼 𝜕𝑥
and for the wall temperature
3 𝑢𝑜 𝑟𝑜2 𝜕𝑇
𝑇𝑤 = 𝑇𝑐 + 16 5.56
𝛼 𝜕𝑥
𝜕𝑇
𝑘� �
𝜕𝑟 𝑟=𝑟𝑜
ℎ= (𝑇𝑤 −𝑇𝑏 )
5.58
ℎ𝑑
𝑁𝑢𝐷 = 𝑘
= 4.364 5.61
𝑘
ℎ = 4.364 ∗ 𝑑
ℎ 𝑁𝑢𝐷 𝑓
𝑆𝑡 = = 𝑅𝑒 = 𝑃𝑟 ≈ 1 5.62
𝜌𝑐𝑝 𝑢𝑚 𝐷 𝑃𝑟 8
0.316
𝑓= 1 for 4 ∗ 103 < 𝑅𝑒𝐷 ≤ 2 ∗ 105 and 5.63
4
𝑅𝑒𝐷
1
𝑁𝑢𝐷 −
𝑅𝑒𝐷 𝑃𝑟
= 0.0395𝑅𝑒𝐷 4
3
𝑁𝑢𝐷 = 0.0395𝑅𝑒4𝐷 for 4 ∗ 103 < 𝑅𝑒𝐷 ≤ 2 ∗ 105 and 𝑃𝑟 ≈ 1 5.64
2
𝑓
𝑆𝑡𝑃𝑟 3 = 8 𝑃𝑟 ≠ 1 5.65
3 1
𝑁𝑢𝐷 = 0.0395𝑅𝑒4𝐷 𝑃𝑟 3 for 4 ∗ 103 < 𝑅𝑒𝐷 ≤ 2 ∗ 105 and 𝑃𝑟 ≠ 1 5.66
𝑇𝑏1 +𝑇𝑏2
𝑇𝑏 =
2
When the difference between the surface and the fluid temperatures is large, it may be
necessary to account for the variation of viscosity with temperature. The average
Nusselt number for developing laminar flow in a circular tube in that case can be
determined from [Sieder and Tate (1936),
1
𝑅𝑒 Pr 𝐷 3 𝜇 0.14 𝑅𝑒𝐷 Pr 𝐷
����𝐷 =
𝑁𝑢 1.86 � 𝐷𝐿 � �𝜇 𝑏 � > 10 5.71
𝑤 𝐿
All properties are evaluated at the bulk mean fluid temperature, except for 𝜇𝑤 , which is evaluated
at the𝑇𝑤 .
Entry Length
More recent information by Gnielinski suggests that better results for turbulent flow
in smooth tubes may be obtained from the following:
0.5 < 𝑃𝑟 < 1.5
𝑁𝑢𝐷 = 0.0214(𝑅𝑒𝐷0.8 − 100)𝑃𝑟 0.4 � 4 5.73
10 < 𝑅𝑒𝐷 < 5 ∗ 106
Or
1.5 < 𝑃𝑟 < 500
𝑁𝑢𝐷 = 0.012(𝑅𝑒𝐷0.87 − 280)𝑃𝑟 0.4 � 5.74
103 < 𝑅𝑒𝐷 < 106
To take into account the property variations, Sieder and Tate recommend the
following relation:
1
𝜇 0.14
𝑁𝑢𝐷 = 0.027𝑅𝑒𝐷0.8 𝑃𝑟 3 �𝜇 𝑏 � 5.75
𝑤
The above equations are apply to fully developed turbulent flow in tubes. In the
entrance region the flow is not developed, and Nusselt recommended the following
equation:
1
𝐷 0.055 𝐿
𝑁𝑢𝐷 = 0.036𝑅𝑒𝐷0.8 𝑃𝑟 3 � 𝐿 � For 10 < 𝐷 < 400 5.76
Entry Length
𝐿𝑡,𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑏𝑢𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑡 ≈ 10𝐷
The above equations offer simplicity in computation, but uncertainties on the order of
±25 percent are not uncommon. Petukhov has developed a more accurate, although
more complicated, expression for fully developed turbulent flow in smooth tubes:
𝑓
� �𝑅𝑒𝐷 𝑃𝑟 𝜇 𝑛
𝑁𝑢𝐷 = 8
2 �𝜇 𝑏 � 5.77
𝑓 0.5 𝑤
1.07+12.7� � �𝑃𝑟 3 −1�
8
Where:
𝑛 = 0.11 for 𝑇𝑤 > 𝑇𝑏 ,
𝑛 = 0.25 for 𝑇𝑤 < 𝑇𝑏 , and
𝑛=0 for constant heat flux or for gases.
All properties are evaluated at
(𝑇𝑤 +𝑇𝑏)
𝑇𝑓 = 2
except for 𝜇𝑏 and 𝜇𝑤 .
The friction factor may be obtained either from the following for smooth tubes:
𝑓 = (1.82 log10 𝑅𝑒𝐷 − 1.64 )−2 5.78
All above equations are for smooth pipes. For rough pipe we use the equation below:
2
𝑓
𝑆𝑡𝑏 𝑃𝑟𝑓 = 8
3
2
𝑁𝑢𝐷 𝑓
𝑅𝑒𝐷 𝑃𝑟
𝑃𝑟3𝑓 =8
𝐿 2
𝑢𝑚
∆𝑝 = 𝑓 𝐷 𝜌 2
An empirical relation for the friction factor for rough tubes is given as
1.325
𝑓= 2
𝜀 5.74
�ln� �+ 0.9 �
3.7𝐷 𝑅𝑒
𝐷
𝜀
For 10−6 < 𝐷 < 10−3 , and 5000 < 𝑅𝑒𝐷 < 108
𝐷
ℎ𝐷ℎ 0.03� ℎ �𝑅𝑒𝐷ℎ 𝑃𝑟
𝑁𝑢𝐷ℎ = = 7.45 + 𝐿
2 entry region, laminar flow 𝑅𝑒 ≤ 2800
𝑘 𝐷 3
1+0.016�� ℎ �𝑅𝑒𝐷ℎ 𝑃𝑟�
𝐿
𝐷ℎ = 2𝑆
Where
𝑆 : is the space between the two plates.
𝑝 (2)(1.0132∗105 )
𝜌 = 𝑅𝑇 = (287)(473)
= 1.493 kg/m3
𝑁𝑢𝐷 = 0.023𝑅𝑒𝐷0.8 𝑃𝑟 𝑛
For heating the fluid n=0.4
𝑁𝑢𝐷 = 0.023(14756)0.8 (0.681)0.4 = 42.67
𝑁𝑢𝐷 𝑘 (42.67)(0.0386)
ℎ= 𝐷
= 0.0254
= 64.85 W/m2.˚C.
𝑞
𝐿
= ℎ𝜋𝐷(𝑇𝑤 − 𝑇𝑏) = (64.85)(𝜋)(0.0254)(20) = 103.5 W/m.
𝑞
𝑞 = 𝑚̇𝑐𝑝 ∆𝑇𝑏 = 𝐿 �𝐿 �
𝜋𝐷 2 (0.0254)2
𝑚̇ = 𝜌𝑢𝑚 = (1.493)(10)(𝜋) = 7.565 ∗ 10−3 kg/s.
4 4
𝑞
𝐿� � (3)(103.5)
∆𝑇𝑏 = 𝐿
= (7.565∗10−3 )(1025) = 40.04 ˚C.
𝑚̇𝑐𝑝
So Equation (5.71) or Equation (5.70) is applicable. We do not yet know the mean
bulk temperature to evaluate properties so we first make the calculation on the basis
of 60◦C,
𝑇𝑏2 = 71.98 ˚C
𝑇𝑏1 +𝑇𝑏2 60+71.98
𝑇𝑏,𝑎𝑣𝑔 = = = 66 ˚C
2 2
𝜌 = 982 kg/m3
𝑃𝑟 = 2.78 , 𝜇 = 4.36 ∗ 10−4 kg/m.s, 𝑘 = 0.656 W/m.˚C, 𝑐𝑝 = 4.185 kj/kg. ˚C.
𝜌𝑢𝑚 𝐷 (982)(0.02)(0.0254)
𝑅𝑒𝐷 = 𝜇
= 4.63∗10−4
= 1147
𝑅𝑒𝐷 Pr 𝐷 (1147)(2.78)(0.0254)
𝐿
= 3
= 27.00 > 10
1
𝑅𝑒 Pr 𝐷 3 𝜇 0.14
����
𝑁𝑢𝐷 = 1.86 � 𝐷𝐿 � �𝜇 𝑏 �
𝑤
4.36 1 0.14
����
𝑁𝑢𝐷 = 1.86(27)3 �3.55� = 5.743
𝑁𝑢𝐷 𝑘 (5.743)(0.656)
ℎ= 𝐷
= 0.0254
= 148.3 W/m2.˚C.
60+𝑇𝑏2
(148.3)(𝜋)(0.0254)(3) �80 − � = (9.982 ∗ 10−3 )(4185)(𝑇𝑏2 − 60)
2
𝑇𝑏2 = 71.88 ˚C
5.9 Flow Across Cylinders And Spheres
As the flow progresses along the front side of the cylinder, the pressure would
decrease and then increase along the back side of the cylinder, resulting in an increase
in free-stream velocity on the front side of the cylinder and a decrease on the back
side. The transverse velocity (that velocity parallel to the surface) would decrease
from a value of 𝑢∞ at the outer edge of the boundary layer to zero at the surface. As
the flow proceeds to the back side of the cylinder, the pressure increase causes a
reduction in velocity in the free stream and throughout the boundary layer.
Figure 5.10 Cylinder in cross flow. Figure 5.11 Velocity distributions indicating flow separation
on a cylinder in cross flow.
The pressure increase and reduction in velocity are related through the Bernoulli
equation written along a streamline:
𝑑𝑝 𝑢2
𝜌
= −𝑑 �2𝑔 �
𝑐
When the velocity gradient at the surface becomes zero, the flow is said to have reached a separation
point:
𝜕𝑢
seperation point at 𝜕𝑦� =0
𝑦=0
Figure 5.12: Drag coefficient for circular cylinders as a function of the Reynolds number.
Figure 5.13: Drag coefficient for spheres as a function of the Reynolds number.
5.9.1 Cylinder
The resulting correlation for average heat-transfer coefficients in cross flow over
circular cylinders is
𝑛 1
ℎ𝐷 𝑢∞ 𝐷
𝑁𝑢𝐷𝑓 = 𝑘𝑓
= 𝐶� 𝑣𝑓
� 𝑃𝑟𝑓3 ( flow of gas) 5.80
where the constants 𝐶 and 𝑛 are tabulated in Table 5.1. Properties for use with
Equation (5.80) are evaluated at the film temperature as indicated by the subscript 𝑓 .
5.9.2 Spheres
McAdams recommends the following relation for heat transfer from spheres to a
flowing gas:
• Flow of gas
ℎ𝐷 𝑢∞ 𝐷 0.6
𝑘
= 𝑁𝑢𝐷 = 0.37 � 𝑣
� 17 < 𝑅𝑒𝐷 < 7 ∗ 104 5.84
Achenbach has obtained relations applicable over a still wider range of Reynolds
1 5
𝑁𝑢𝐷 = 2 + (0.25𝑅𝑒𝐷 + 3 ∗ 10−4 𝑅𝑒𝐷1.6 )2 �100 < 𝑅𝑒𝐷 < 3 ∗ 10 5.84
𝑃𝑟 = 0.71
5 6
𝑁𝑢𝐷 = 430 + 𝑎 𝑅𝑒𝐷 + 𝑏 𝑅𝑒𝐷2 + 𝑐 𝑅𝑒𝐷3 �3 ∗ 10 < 𝑅𝑒𝐷 < 5 ∗ 10 5.85
𝑃𝑟 = 0.71
• Flow of liquid
For flow of liquids past spheres, the data of Kramers may be used to obtain the
Correlation
𝑢∞ 𝐷 0.5
𝑁𝑢𝐷 𝑃𝑟 −0.3 = 0.97 + 0.68 � 𝑣
� 1 < 𝑅𝑒𝐷 < 2000 5.86
H.W
1
1 2
1.8462 4
𝑁𝑢𝐷 = 2 + �(0.4)(3059) + (0.06)(3059)
2 3 � (0.708)0.4 � 2.075 � = 31.4
(𝑁𝑢𝐷 )(𝑘) (31.4)(0.02624)
ℎ= = = 68.66 W/m2.˚C.
𝐷 0.012
𝑞 = ℎ4𝜋𝐷2 (𝑇𝑤 − 𝑇∞ )
𝑞 = (68.66)(4𝜋)(0.006)2 (77 − 27) = 1.553 W
For staggered
1
𝑆𝑛 2 2
If ��� 2 � + 𝑆𝑝2 � − 𝑑� ∗ 2 < (𝑆𝑛 − 𝑑)
Then
1
𝑠 𝑢
2 𝑛 ∞
𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 1 (staggered arrangement) 5.90
𝑆𝑛 2 2 2
�� � +𝑆𝑝 � −𝑑
2
1
𝑆𝑛 2 2
If ��� 2 � + 𝑆𝑝2 � − 𝑑� ∗ 2 > (𝑆𝑛 − 𝑑)
𝑠𝑛
𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝑢∞ �(𝑠 �
𝑛 −𝑑)
The nomenclature for use with Table 5.3 is shown in Figure 5.14. The data of Table
5.3 pertain to tube banks having 10 or more rows of tubes in the direction of flow. For
fewer rows the ratio of h for N rows deep to that for 10 rows is given in Table 5.4.
𝑛 1
ℎ𝑑 𝑢∞ 𝑑
𝑁𝑢𝑑𝑓 = 𝑘𝑓
= 𝐶� 𝑣𝑓
� 𝑃𝑟𝑓3 (5.80)
Table 5.3 Modified correlation of Grimson for heat transfer in tube banks of 10 rows or more,
, for use with Equation (5.80).
Figure 5.14 Nomenclature for use with Table 5.3: (a) in-line tube rows; (b) staggered tube
rows.
Table 5.4 Ratio of h for N rows deep to that for 10 rows deep, for use with Equation (5.80).
Zukauskas has presented additional information for tube bundles that takes into
account wide ranges of Reynolds numbers and property variations. The correlating
equation takes the form
1
�𝑑
ℎ 𝑛 𝑃𝑟 4 10 < 𝑅𝑒𝑑,𝑚𝑎𝑥 < 106
𝑁𝑢 = = 𝐶𝑅𝑒𝑑,𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝑃𝑟 0.36 �𝑃𝑟 � � 5.91
𝑘 𝑤 0.7 < 𝑃𝑟 < 500
where all properties except 𝑃𝑟𝑤 are evaluated at 𝑇∞ and the values of the constants are
given in Table 5.5 for greater than 20 rows of tubes. For gases the Prandtl number
ratio has little influence and is dropped. Once again, note that the Reynolds number is
based on the maximum velocity in the tube bundle. For less than 20 rows in the
direction of flow the correction factor in Table 5.6 should be applied. It is essentially
the same as for the Grimson correlation.
Table 5.5 Constants for Zukauskas correlation [Equation (5.91)] for heat transfer in tube
banks of 20 rows or more.
Table 5.6 Ratio of h for N rows deep to that for 20 rows deep for use with Equation (5.91).
Air at 1 atm and 10◦C flows across a bank of tubes 15 rows high and 5 rows deep at a
velocity of 7 m/s measured at a point in the flow before the air enters the tube bank.
The surfaces of the tubes are maintained at 65◦C. The diameter of the tubes is 1 in
[2.54 cm]; they are arranged in an in-line manner so that the spacing in both the
normal and parallel directions to the flow is 1.5 in [3.81 cm]. Calculate the total heat
transfer per unit length for the tube bank and the exit air temperature.
Solution
The constants for use with Equation (5.80) may be obtained from Table 5.3, using
The properties of air are evaluated at the film temperature, which at entrance to the
tube bank is
𝑛 1
ℎ𝐷 𝑢∞ 𝐷
𝑁𝑢𝐷𝑓 = 𝑘𝑓
= 𝐶� 𝑣𝑓
� 𝑃𝑟𝑓
3
(5.80)
Because there are only 5 rows deep, this value must be multiplied by the factor 0.92,
as determined from Table 5.4.
The total surface area for heat transfer, considering unit length of tubes, is