Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 5 - Quality
Chapter 5 - Quality
Chapter 5 - Quality
Supplier Quality
Agenda
1. Supplier Quality
2. The Cost of Quality
3. Supply Quality Management Tools and Techniques
3.1 Total Quality Management
3.2 Kaizen – Continuous Improvement
3.3 Statistical Process Control (SPC)
3.4 Six Sigma
3.5 LEAN
3.6 QA/QC System
3.7 ISO/MBNAQ
1. What Is Quality?
Quality: the ability of the supplier to provide goods
and services in conformance with specifications.
Quality: the item performs in actual use to the
expectations of the original requirement
Keys to supplier quality: The ability to meet or exceed
current and future customer expectations or
requirements within critical performance areas on a
consistent basis
3
Dimensions of Quality
1. Performance - primary characteristics of the product/service
2. Aesthetics - appearance, feel, smell, taste, sound
3. Features - extra characteristics
4. Safety: Risk of injury
5. Reliability - consistency of performance, probability of failure
during a specified time period
6. Durability - useful life of the product/service
7. Perceived Quality – image in the eyes of customer (reputation)
8.Serviceability: the maintainability and ease of fixing. - handling of
customer complaints or checking on customer satisfaction
8
Cost of Quality
.. should be less then..
<
A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, Fifth Edition (PMBOK® Guide) ©2013 Project Management
Institute, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Figure 8-5 Page 235.
2. Cost of Quality
Prevention costs
Prevent defects from occurring
Appraisal costs
Direct costs of measuring quality
Failure costs
Internal – occur before product or service is provided to
customer
External – occur following production or after customer takes
possession
10
Cost Examples
Appraisal
Laboratory testing of samples
Inspection activities during production
Supplier quality audits
Incoming material inspections
Other forms of monitoring
11
Cost Examples
Internal Failure:
Troubleshooting
Re-inspection following detection of defects
Production downtime caused by defects
Scrap
Process waste
External Failure
Warranty costs
Replacement of defective products
Product liability lawsuits
Loss of customers
12
Cost Examples
Prevention
Quality planning
Equipment calibration
Quality training
Maintenance of a quality management system
Morale cost
The morale cost of producing (or having to use)
defective products or services
Effects:
Productivity ↓
Continuous improvement ↓
14
Typical Quality Evaluation Process
Process Flow
Scope of
Work
Scope
AFFORDABILITY
NEED DATE
Sc
et
dg
he
Bu
du
Schedule le Estimate
16
Basic Quality Tools
"As much as 95% of quality related problems in the factory
can be solved with seven fundamental quantitative tools." -
Kaoru Ishikawa
A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, Fifth Edition (PMBOK® Guide) ©2013 Project Management
Institute, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Figure 8-7 Page 239.
Cause and Effect
Diagram(*)
Is also called Fishbone Diagram or Ishikawa Diagram
Used to find the root cause of a defect. The causes are found by looking at the
problem statement and asking “why” until the actionable root cause has been
identified or until the reasonable possibilities on each fishbone have been
exhausted
Can be used in quality planning, as well as quality control
Trend
Cycle
Flow Chart
The Flow Chart is a graphic representation of a process.
It identifies the potential improvement opportunity.
Check sheet
Also called tally sheets are useful as checklists while gathering data.
Especially useful during inspections. For example, data about the
frequencies or consequences of defects collected in check-sheets are
often displayed using Pareto diagrams.
Histogram
Is a special form of bar chart to show frequencies of causes of problems to
understand preventive or corrective action.
Unlike the control chart, the histogram does not consider the influence of time on
the variation that exists within a distribution.
Pareto Diagram(*)
The Pareto diagram will
be organized into
categories that measure
either frequencies or
consequences, prioritizes
potential causes of the
problem
• Pareto’s Law (80/20
principle) : 80% of the
problems are due to 20%
of cause => helps focus
attention on the most
critical issues
Scatter diagram(*)
Plots ordered pairs (X, Y) and are
sometimes called correlation charts.
The direction of correlation may be
proportional (positive correlation),
inverse (negative correlation), or a
pattern of correlation may not exist
(zero correlation).
Act
Plan
Plan
Check
Do
34
3.3. Statistical Process Control
Statistical Process Control (SPC) – Quality at the source - is a
technique that involves testing a random sample of output from a
process in order to detect if nonrandom, assignable changes in the
process are occurring.
The basic steps in quality assurance from Buyer’s perspective:
1. Buyer establishes required quality specifications.
2. Supplier determines process capability.
a. Identify common or chance causes of variation.
b. Identify special or assignable causes of variation.
c. Eliminate special causes.
3. Compare buyer’s quality requirements to supplier’s process capability.
4. Make adjustments, if necessary.
a. Negotiate with supplier for process improvements.
b. Seek an alternate supplier. 35
Statistical Process Control
Procedures
Key Focuses of SPC
Focus on prevention of nonconformance:
Need for process consistency
Reduce process variation
Reduce reliance on appraisal, inspection, and detection activities
Supplier certification program
Focus on process, not on output:
Quality processes quality output
Supplier must provide evidence of process capability
Structured, companywide supplier evaluation and selection system
Focus on sample inspections:
How many parts did the supplier produce to get an acceptable sample?
Are the samples representative of the process under normal conditions?
Did the supplier actually produce the sample or use a subcontractor?
Do the samples show evidence of capacity or process capability?
37
Process Capability
(a) (b)
Specification Specification
(c) (d)
Specification Specification
39
Process Capability Analysis
Process analysis follows the steps outlined in the process
improvement plan to identify needed improvements.
This analysis also examines problems experienced,
constraints experienced, and non-value-added activities
identified during process operation.
Process analysis includes root cause analysis—a specific
technique used to identify a problem, discover the
underlying causes that lead to it, and develop preventive
actions.
Process Capability Index
Process Capability Index (Cp): combines process spread and tolerance
into one index and indicates whether process variation is satisfactory.
UTL LTL
Cp
6
Where: UTL = upper tolerance limit
LTL = upper tolerance limit
σ = standard deviation of the process
A process with a Cp of less than 1.0 is generally considered not capable.
If the capability index is greater than 1.0 the process is capable of
producing 99.7 percent of parts within tolerance (~6 sigma).
A Cp of 1.33 has become a standard of process capability. Purchasers
can specify process capability expectations. Some organizations require
a higher value of 2.0. A higher value means fewer defects and greater
quality.
Process Capability Index (cont.)
Cpk Index: This index adjusts the Cp for the effect of non-centered
distribution.
UTL LTL
C pu ; C pl ; C pk minC pu , C pl
3 3
Process mean - Process spread (3 σ)
Cpk:
Less than 1.0—unacceptable because part of the process distribution
is out of specification.
Between 1 and 1.33 marginal because the process distribution is
barely within specification.
Greater than 1.33 acceptable because the process distribution is well
within the specification.
Example
Control Measure
Improve Analyze
45
3.5 LEAN
Lean goals are:
Eliminate waste and non-value-added activity
Improve quality: understand customers' wants and
needs and design processes to meet their
expectations and requirements.
Reduce time: most effective way to finish an activity
MOST COMMON WASTES
D.O.W.N.T.I.M.E
Defect • Error or mistake lead to rework, scrap
• Incorrect information,
A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, Fifth Edition (PMBOK® Guide) ©2013 Project Management
Institute, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Figure 3-8 Page 404.
Quality Management System
Level 1
Quality
Manual
Policy Level 2
SOP
Record
Level 4
Proof of achievement of the required quality and
effective application of the Quality System
50
Quality Management System
Level 1: Quality Manuals
Document specifying the quality management system of
an organization
Level 2: Policy/Standard operating Procedure
Documents that provide information about how to perform
activities and processes consistently
Level 3: Work Instruction
Documents that provide details guidelines from on HOWs
Level 4: Records
Documents that provide objective evidence of activities
performed or results achieved for continuous improvement
51
Quality Control (QC)
The process of monitoring and recording results of executing the quality
activities to assess performance and recommend necessary changes.
identifying the causes of poor process or product quality and recommending and/or taking
action to eliminate them
validating that project deliverables and work meet the requirements specified by key
stakeholders necessary for final acceptance.
Control Quality process
Approved Validated
CR
CR CR
Perform Integrated Change Monitor and
Control Control Quality Control Project
Work
Verified Accepted
Deliverables
deliverables deliverables
Direct and Manage Control Validate Close Project
Project Execution
Quality Scope
Quality Audit
A quality audit is a structured, independent
process to determine if project activities comply
with organizational and project policies,
processes, and procedures.
Objectives:
Identifying Good/Best practices; Shortcomings/Gaps;
Sharing good practices, Support for implementation
Documenting lesson learned
Can be scheduled or random and performed by Internal
or External auditors
Sampling, Inspection, and Testing
The cost of sampling, testing, and inspection><the
risk of either accepting a lot with more than an
acceptable level of defects or of rejecting a good lot.
Sampling, testing, and inspection are quality
management tools that may be used at three different
stages in the acquisition process:
Before a purchase commitment is made to a supplier.
During the commitment to a supplier.
After a purchase commitment has been made.
Sampling
The goal is to secure a sample that is representative of the total
population being tested.
A random sample is one in which every element in the population has an
equal chance of being selected.
Example: if a shipment of 1,000 balls of supposedly identical
characteristics is thoroughly mixed together and a random sample of 50
balls is picked from the lot and inspected and five are found to be
defective, it is probable that 10 percent of the shipment is defective.
Sequential sampling may be used to reduce the number of items
inspected in accept–reject decisions without loss of accuracy.
Example: In a simple version of sequential sampling, 10 percent of the
lot is inspected, and the whole lot is accepted if the sample is
acceptable. If the sample is not acceptable, an additional 10 percent
may be inspected if the decision to reject cannot be made on the basis
of the first sample.
Testing and Inspection
100% inspection or screening:
Expensive
Depending on the severity of a mistake, an error of discarding a
perfectly good part may be more acceptable than passing a faulty
part
Testing:
Testing products may be necessary before a commitment is made to
purchase.
Use and Laboratory Tests.
Commercial Testing Labs and Services: complicated and expensive
new processes or materials
Inspection upon Receipt: to assure the buyer that the supplier has
delivered an item that corresponds to the description furnished.
Adjustments and Returns
Nonconforming material can be rejected and returned at the supplier’s
expense or held for disposition instructions options: replace, down
grade, rework,…
The costs incurred when materials are rejected:
transportation costs
testing cost,
contingent expense.
Long-term solution: buyer–supplier partnership or a joint quality
program.
Assuring the Quality of Purchased Services
Selected the Best Buy Supplier
Manager supplier performance: Before-During-After the Purchase Order
Post-service evaluation is an essential for service acquisition.
Informal Evaluation: issue, problem solving, expectations of quality, timeliness,
cost, professionalism, service orientation…
Formal Evaluation: Reliability, Responsiveness, Assurance, Empathy, Tangibles
Values of the Service:
Degree of Repetitiveness
Degree of Tangibility
Direction of the Service
Production of the Service
Nature of the Demand
Nature of Service Delivery
Degree of Standardization
Skills Required for the Service
3.7. ISO & MBNQA Criteria
Widely accepted quality management frameworks
ISO: International Standardization Organization in Geneva
ISO 9000:2000 --9001:2008
ISO 14000 - 14001/2004 & 14004/2004
Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (USA)
Criteria are often used as the basis for supplier certification
programs.
60
Principles of ISO 9000:2000
Originally developed in the European Common Market in 1987
Updated in 1994 and 2000, 2008
Internationally accepted and recognized quality process standards
61
ISO 14000
To promote environmental protection and pollution prevention –
14001:2004 & 14004:2004
Used to analyze a supplier’s ability to proactively manage its
environmental impact. Range from environmental management systems
to addressing auditing, labeling, and product standards
Classifications
Process-oriented standards
Product-oriented standards
ISO 14000 Benefits:
Fewer pollutants generated -Reduced liability risk
Improved regulatory compliance -Better public and community relations
Lowered insurance premiums--Enhanced profitability through:
Improved resource management
Reduced waste generation
62
The MBNQA
Originally from US – intended to recognize US company and being
applied internationally. “Doing the right thing at the first time”
philosophy.
Implies that an organization excels not only in quality management
but also in quality achievement – Both process & results oriented
More comprehensive set of quality-related criteria than ISO
Customer satisfaction via products & services quality
Continuous quality improvement
Total involvement
May take 8 – 10 years to adequately prepare a competitive quality
system
63
MBNQA – Total involvement
Leadership
Organizational leadership
Public responsibility and citizenship
Strategic planning
Strategy development
Strategy deployment
Customer and market focus
Customer and market knowledge
Customer satisfaction and relationships
Information and analysis
Measurement of organizational performance
Analysis of organizational performance
Human resource focus
Work systems
Employee education, training, and development
64
Employee well-being and satisfaction
MBNQA – Process & Result
Process management
Product and service processes
Support processes
Supplier and partnering processes
Business results
Customer focused results
Financial and market results
Human resource results
Supplier and partner results
Organizational effectiveness results
65
BACK UP
Homeworks