Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AZTEC AND INCA EMPIRES - Political
AZTEC AND INCA EMPIRES - Political
Department of History
large group of states under a single authority and this authority is often supreme; for
example, the Tlatoani in the Aztec empire and the Sapa Inca in the Incan Empire.1
Brief History and Geographical location of the Aztec and Incan Empires
The Aztec Empire was in the Valley of Mexico or Central Mexico. It was an
extensive civilisation that contained approximately 15 million living in 500 towns and
cities. Their main city or capital city was called Tenochtitlan which had a population
The Incan Empire was in the Andean Region of South America. Its population
was between 5 and 71/2 million Incans.3 The extent of this empire reached from the
Cuzco region to areas between present day Ecuador and the Maule River in Chile. The
Empire was divided into four provinces. These were called ‘Tawantinsuyu’ meaning
1
Oxford dictionary
2
George Vaillant, Aztecs of Mexico: Origin rise and fall of the Aztec Nation, (New York: Doubleday
and Company, 1950) p 4.
3
Ibid p4.
4
Maria Rostworowski de Diez Canseco, History of the Inca Realm (United Kingdom: Cambridge
University Press, 1999) pp137-162
1|Page
OBERLIN HIGH SCHOOL
Department of History
agrarian in nature and some organised in such a way that facilitated military
expansion.5 There were two such groups in the Valley, the Tepanecs and the Mexicas
(who were soon to become the Aztecs. These groups survived by a policy of
collaboration and alliances to facilitate strength and superiority in the Valley.6 This
was called the Chichimec Alliance of which the Tepanecs were the dominant ones.
Naturally, the militaristic cultural group would rise to dominance in this alliance.
Thus, the Mexicas were seen as a threat and were isolated by the Tepanecs on the
Lake Texcoco. There, after many years of isolation, they developed their culture,
developed their own major city in 1325 called Tenochtitlan and finally, developed a
powerfull alliance/coalition with two neighbouring groups, the Tlacopans and the
Texcocans.7 It was this alliance that proved detrimental to the Tepanecs who lost
control of the Chichimec alliance and subsequently their dominance in the Valley.
The capital city of the Tepanecs, Atzapotalco, was overthrown in 1428 and
Tenochtitlan established as the main city.8 From this point until the conquest in 1519-
1521, the Mexicas developed an expansionist policy based upon military might. Thus,
they urgently eradicated their former allies and took control of the entire Valley of
5
Hilary Beckles and Verene Shepherd, Liberties Lost: Caribbean Indigenous Societies and Slave
Systems, (United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2004) p22.
6
Jenny Jemmott, Aleric Josehps and Kathleen Monteith, The Caribbean, The Atlantic and Global
Tramsformation
7
ibid
8
Dr. Michael E. Smith, Aztec culture: An overview, (USA: Arizona State University, 2006) p3.
2|Page
OBERLIN HIGH SCHOOL
Department of History
The Incan rise to prominence in the Andean Region was due mainly to their
militaristic might and expansionist agenda, much like the Aztecs. The Incas were
eager to expand their territories and borders and the extent of their empires. The
throughout the history of the Peruvian Empire.9 The two most famous emperors were
Pachatui (1433-1471) and his son Topa Inca (1471-1498) who were able to
consolidate power and to take control of the Highlands and lowlands which consisted
of the vast coastal plains. By the time the empire was at its zenith, a third ruler
Huayna Capac (1498-1525) was able to expand the empire to conquer areas in
present day Ecuador.10 The Inca were keen on nationalism and cultural identity.
Conquered peoples were assimilated into Inca society, and the Inca borrowed from
“Middle America (Aztec and Maya) and the Andean Region (Incas) were
“...peak of Indian social, and material culture,”12 which had an over arching ideology
Political Organisation
9
Helaine Silverman and William Harris Isbell eds, Handbook of South American Archaeology, (New
York: Springer Science and Business, 2008) pp 137-162
10
George Vaillant, Aztecs of Mexico: Origin rise and fall of the Aztec Nation, (New York: Doubleday
and Company, 1950) p 5.
11
Vaillant, Aztecs of Mexico p6
12
Vaillant, Aztecs of Mexico p6
3|Page
OBERLIN HIGH SCHOOL
Department of History
LOCAL GOVERNMENT14 Leader of the Calpulli The Ayllus - basic family unit
Calpulli unit- entrusted with the sole purpose
economic/production unit; of farming the land given by the
basic agricultural Sapa Inca and additional lands
processes of the empire. for food storage in the empire.
13
Smith, Aztec Culture p4
14
Maria Rostworowski de Diez Canseco, History of the Inca Realm (United Kingdom: Cambridge
University Press, 1999) pp137-162
4|Page
OBERLIN HIGH SCHOOL
Department of History
Both empires had a ‘principle of hierarchy’ as both the Aztec and the Inca states had a
distinctive political system. Each empire had tiers and each tier had different levels of
power; final decisions being made by the Tlatoani and the Sapa Inca respectively. There
was also evidence of a delegation of power by the kings to trusted nobles of these
Empires.
In addition, the rulers were also ‘absolute’ leaders, but more so in the Incan
Empire as the Sapa Inca was seen as the chief descendant of the Sun god or ‘the son of
the sun’.15 It was not until the ascendance on King Moctezuma II16 (1502-1521) to the
Aztec throne, that the empire saw a divine ruler; a descendant of the god Huitzilopochtli.
Hereditary rule was also a feature common in both Empires. It followed naturally in the
Incan Empire that the ruler had to be from the bloodline of the Sun god. So, the Sapa
Inca ruled until death, thereafter, his eldest son would inherit the title and the throne. In
the Aztec Empire, transference of power was not as in the Inca territory, the position of
Tlatoani was one that was selected by a group of nobles, the pipiltin who were a
hereditary class. He was chosen based on military prowess and knowledge of the
empires’ history. Also, both Empires had political elites which were, often than none at
all, in support of the King and was the ruling class. That is, a smaller more important
15
Hiram Bingham, Lost City of the Incas (Peru: Harwthorn Books Inc, 1948) p4.
16
Cape book
5|Page
OBERLIN HIGH SCHOOL
Department of History
group of persons in favour of the leadership of the empire was evident in both empires.
Emperor Ahuitzotl established this in the Aztec empire as a means of consolidating power
in the empire. It was the notions of expansionism and a militaristic nature that helped the
indigenes to rise to a status and grandeur that they were. Their military might and will
helped them to exceed their boundaries rapidly. The ore they expanded, the more they
needed systems of control to ensure power was consolidated, and taxes and tributes were
paid. This typified the nature of their imperial organisation, they needed to expand to
grow and they did this by constant conquest of weaker nation-state around them.
6|Page