JEE (Scopus Q3)

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 7

Received: 2017.10.

09
Journal of Ecological Engineering Accepted: 2017.10.28
Volume 19, Issue 1, January 2018, pages 195–199 Published: 2018.01.01
https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/79414

Indirect Electrochemical Oxidation with Multi Carbon Electrodes


for Restaurant Wastewater Treatment

I Dewa Ketut Sastrawidana1*, I Nyoman Sukarta1


1
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematic and Natural Sciences, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
Singaraja, Jl. Udayana No. 11, Singaraja, Bali, Indonesia
* Corresponding author’s e-mail: ketut.sastrawidana@undiksha.ac.id

1. Apa yang dilakukan/Tujuan


ABSTRACT
The removal of organic matter from the restaurant wastewater was investigated using the electrochemical oxida-
tion method with multi carbon electrodes in a parallel construction. The degradation process was monitored by
the measurement of COD concentration as a function of electrolysis time. The effect of operating parameter
condi- tions on COD removal were investigated including initial pH, distance between electrodes, and the
applied voltage difference. The results showed that the treatment of restaurant wastewater containing 2 g/L
chloride ion using the electrochemical oxidation technique at the operation conditions characterized by: pH 5,
distance between electrode of 10 cm and applied voltage of 12 V, enabled to obtained COD removal
3. Cara of 92.84%
mencapai tujuan/metode
within 90 min electrolysis time. It is can be concluded that the indirect electrochemical oxidation method with
multi carbon electrodes can be used effectively as an alternative technology for reducing COD and may be
potentially applied for removal organic pollutants from wastewater at the industrial scale. 2. Hasil yang diperoleh
Keywords: chemical oxygen demand, electrochemical oxidation, multi carbon electrodes, removal efficiency,
restaurant wastewater. 4. Makna temuan

1.Pernyataan masalah
INTRODUCTION 2. Dampak masalah
application of the suitable technology before be-
ing discharged into the environment.
Restaurants are one of the kinds of business Numerous studies have been conducted to
that is growing rapidly in Bali province of Indo- re- move the organic pollutants from the
nesia. The growth of restaurant business without restaurant wastewater, such as the chemical
respect to the environment may potentially have methods us- ing advanced oxidation
a negative impact on environmental process[Krzeminska et al. 2015],
sustainability due to a wastewater that is 3. Penelitian relevan sebelumnya/
electrocoagulation [Chen atapa al. yang
2000]; physical
telah dilakukan peneliti
produced as a by-prod- uct. The restaurant methods through ultrafiltration
lainand nanofiltration
dalam menangani masalah
wastewater has a characteris- tic high content of membranes [Zulaikha et al. 2014]; as well as the
tersebut?
organic pollutant, which is in- dicated with the biological method with a combined activated
extremely high COD value, TSS and fat, oil and sludge-contact aeration system [Chen and Lo.
grease (FOG). The main factor contributing to 2006]. Most of the available technologies cannot
the high content of organic pol- lutants from be applied in industry, especially small
restaurant wastewater comes from food industries, due to high operational cost and the
preparation materials such as meat, fat, oils, fats requirement of a qualified staff for the operation.
and also the use of cleaning agents such as On the other hand, the technology for treatment
disinfectants, cleaners, and soaps. The high con- restaurant wastewater has to be simple, inexpen-
centrations of soluble organics pollutant in the sive and operated easily because the profit mar-
wastewater have a negative impact to the envi- gins of most restaurants are quite4.small.
Apa yang mau kita lakukan
ronment due to the unpleasant odors generated. The electrochemical oxidation is a simple,
The organic compound in a restaurant should be low cost technology but has a high efficiency
properly reduced to acceptable levels through the for the treatment wastewater. This technology is
1
6. Apa yang menjadi fokus/tujuan
kita

Journal of Ecological Engineering Vol. 19(1), 2018

relatively new and considered a green collected in plastic tanks; COD and initial pH
technology because it does not add any external before treatment were analyzed based on APHA
chemicals. The electro-oxidation process of standard methods 5220C for COD analysis and
pollutants can be formed in two ways: direct APHA standard methods 4500H for pH measure-
oxidation and in- direct oxidation. In the direct ment. The measurement of Initial pH and COD
electro-oxidation, pollutants are oxidized after value for restaurant wastewater samples were ob-
adsorption on the anode surface without the tained for 6.75 units and 1440 mg/L.
involvement of others substance [Can 2014]
On the other hand, the indirect electro-oxi- The indirect electrochemical oxidation
dation comprises two steps: in the first step, the reactor set up
electrolytes are oxidized at the anode to generate
the strong oxidizing agents such as hipochlorous The indirect electrochemical oxidation reac-
acid, chlorine, hydrogen peroxide. In the second tor was made for an acrylic sheet with dimension
step, these oxidants oxidize the pollutants and of 60×30×25 cm. Reactor of electrochemical
convert them into the simpler compounds like oxi- dation set up for wastewater treatment was
carbon dioxide and water [Rajeshwar et al. pre- sented in Figure 1. 5. Dukungan teoritis dari gagasan
1997]. This technology has been tested at Degradation experiment of kitarestaurant waste-
laboratory scale and proven to successfully water was done in an electrochemical oxidation
cell reactor with a volume of 2.50 L. The multi
remove pollut- ants from paper mill effluent
carbon (5 anodes and 5 cathodes) with the diam-
[Zayas et al. 2011], landfill leachate [Rada et al.
eter of 1 cm and length of 10 cm was used as the
2013], oil refinery wastewater [Candido et al.
electrode. Multi carbon electrodes were arranged
2013], petrochemi- cal effluents [Huitle et al.
in a parallel system and connected to DC power
2014], pharmaceutical wastewater [Coria et al.
supply. A stirrer was employed
Metode: in the reactor to
Berisikan
2014], textile wastewater [Subramaniam et al.
ensure homogeneity of the restaurant wastewa-
1. Deskripsi material yang
2016, Najafpoor et al. 2017] and domestic
ter. The investigated operating parameters that
digunakan (sampel maupun alat)
wastewater [Akarsu et al. 2017].
influence the COD removal efficiencykita
2. Bagaimana include
mengambil data
The aim of the present study is to assess initial pH, the distance between electrodes, and
the capability of indirect electrochemical oxi- 3. Parameter apa yang diukur dan
applied voltage.
dation with multi carbon electrodes in the deg- bagaimana caranya menngukur
radation of restaurant wastewater. The operat-
ing parameters involving the initial pH, applied RESULT AND DISCUSSION
potential, and the distance between electrodes
also were investigated.
The effect of pH
Hasil dan Pembahasan berisikan:
The performance of electrochemical
MATERIALS AND METHODS 1. Ulasan
oxidation is pH dependent. Insingkat pencarian data
the electro-
2. Hasil
oxidation process, chloride ion yang dipeoleh
is used as the
Sample collection supporting electrolyte 3.for generating
Uraian active
hasil yang didukung oleh
uraianof teori
chlorines (Cl2, HOCl and ClO-) danratio
different dukungan hasil
The restaurant wastewater under study was influenced by the pH. The penelitian lain. pH on
effect of initial
taken from a Chinese food restaurant in the Bule- COD removal efficiency of the restaurant
leng district of Bali, Indonesia. The samples wastewater was investigated at dif-
were

Figure 1. Performance of
Journal of Ecological Engineering Vol. 19(1), 2018

electrochemical oxidation reactor set up.


ferent pH range from 3 to 10 with the use HCl rine gas, at the pH range of 3.3 < pH < 7.5. The
and NaOH concentrated to adjust the pH. In the ac- tive chlorines were present as hypochlorous
entire experiment, the electrolysis was acid whereas hypochlorite ion was mainly
performed at the voltage of 12 V with present at pH > 7.5 [Azeroual at al. 2017]. In this
wastewater sample contain- ing 2 g/L chloride work, the obtained COD removal efficiency
ion. The percent COD removal in each from restaurant wastewater was 92% at pH of 5.
experiment was monitored as a function of The optimum pH found in this research was
electrolysis duration. The effect of initial pH on slight different from the one obtained by Babu et
COD removal is presented in Figure 2. al. 2012 who reported that the indirect electro-
As can be observed from Figure 3, the pH is oxidation for COD removal from real polluted
an important factor influencing the percent COD water reached 68% at pH of 4.5, with the applied
removal. The removal efficiency of COD has in- voltage of 16 V, NaCl concentration of 0.5 g/L
creased up to the pH of 5 due to the generation within 120 electrolysis time. However, this
of hypochlorous acid at anode which would be finding contrasts with Rajkumar et al. 2004, who
higher at acidic condition. The electrolysis of reported that the COD removal efficiency by
chloride ion at anode surface generating the ac- electrochemical oxi- dation treatment was not
tive chlorines (Cl2, HOCl, ClO-) which are strong significantly influenced by the pH at the range of
oxidizing agents with standard reduction poten- 3–9. They found that the treatment at the initial
tial (Eored) value were 1.36 V, 1.49 V and 0.89 V pH of 3–10 within 40 min changed to pH at
vs SHE, respectively. On the basis of the range of 7.8–8.3 and then remained constant at
standard reduction potential value, the increasing pH of 8.3. A decrease in pH during the
oxidant activity was as followsŁ HOCl > Cl -
2
> electrochemical oxidation process was also
ClO . The observed in our study. The change in pH from
proportion of active chlorines generation is pH the initial pH during electrolysis time was
dependent. The electrolysis of chloride ions at presented in Figure 3.
low pH (pH < 3.3) predominantlz produced chlo-

Figure 2. Percent of COD removal


efficiency as a function of electrolysis
duration at the difference
of the initial pH

197
Figure 3. Changing in pH during the
by the distance
indirect electrochemical oxidation of
restaurant wastewater between electrodes. Effect of potential
(initial pH 3–10) At the elec- trolysis difference
time range of 10 to
In Figure 3 a distance between 60 min, the COD re- Electrochemical
change in pH during electrodes on COD moval efficiency oxidation was
the electro- oxidation removal was increased with the conducted us- ing
process can be illustrated in Figure 4. decreasing distance different applied
observed; the Figure 4 clearly between the cathode voltage to examine
treatment at range of shows that COD and anode, while the effect of voltage
initial pH 3–10 removal from the COD removal on COD removal
changed to 4.25–9.56 restaurant wastewater efficiency was not from the restaurant
after 90 min of by means of elec- change sig- nificantly wastewater. The
electrolysis. trochemical oxidation at 60 to 90 min of variations of COD
Increasing the pH in treatment was electrolysis time. removal as a function
each treatment at the influenced This result is in line of electrolysis
initial pH of 3–8 may with Naje et al. 2015, duration at voltage 9,
be caused by the who found that the 12 and 15 V are
hydroxide ion, which removal of COD presented in Figure 5.
is generated at the from the tex- tile Figure 5 shows
cathode during the wastewater was that for each potential
electro-oxidation pro- increases with differ- ence, the COD
cess, whereas the decreasing inter- removal efficiency
treatment at the initial electrode distance. significantly
pH of 9 and 10
results in a slight
decrease due to ion
hydrogen which is
generated at the
anode.

Effect of the
distance between
electrodes
In order to
investigate the effect
of the distance
between electrodes
on COD removal, the Figure 4. Percent COD removal
experi- ment was efficiency as function of electrolysis
conducted at varying duration at difference distance
inter electrode dis- between electrodes.
tance. The effect of

198
Figure 5. Percent COD removal efficiency as and the active 4. Can O.T. 2014. COD
function of electrolysis duration at differet applied chlorine removal from fruit-
voltage. concentration in juice pro- duction
analyte on the
increases along with COD removal from wastewater by
indirect electrooxidation
growing electrolysis 2.5 L restaurant electrochemical
time. This is due to wastewater was electroco- agulation
oxidation of the Acid and electro-fenton
the production of obtained at the Red 35 dye. J. Mater. processes. Desalina-
oxidants (active optimum param- eters Environ. Sci. 8(8), tion and Water
chlorines) in the of initial pH equal to 2769. Treatment. 52, 65–73.
solution, where the 5, the distance 3. Babu S.A., Raja S., 5. Candido L., Ponciano
increasing production between electrodes of Sibi S., Neeraja P. Gomes J.A.C., Jambo
of active chlorines 10 cm, and applied 2012. De- H.C.M. 2013.
such as hypochlo- voltage of 12 volt colorization of Electrochemical
synthetic and treatment of oil re-
rous acid is within 90 min
polluted water by in- finery wastewater
proportional to the electrolysis time and direct
applied voltage. For 2.0 g ad- dition of for NH3-N and
electrochemical COD removal. Int.
the applied voltage of chloride ion per liter oxidation process. J. Electrochem. Sci.
9, 12 and 15 V, the of wastewater. Poll. Res. 31(1), 45– 8, 9187–9200.
maximum obtained 49.
6. Chen X., Chen G.,
COD removal Acknowledgements Yue P.L. 2000.
efficiency af- ter 90 Separation of pol-
min of electrolysis The authors would lutants from
reached 84.75, 92.84 like to take this restaurant wastewater
and 96.83%, opportu- nity to by Electrocoagu-
respectively. thanks the Ministry of lation. Separation and
However, the electro- Research, Technol- Purification Tech. 19,
ogy and Higher 65–76.
oxidation process at a
Education of 7. Chen C.K., Lo S.L.
voltage of 15 V with
Indonesia through the 2006. Treating
inters electrodes restaurant waste-
distance of 10 cm directorate of research
water using a
causes the abrasion of and community combined activated
the carbon electrode. service for financially sludge-contact
Therefore, the supporting this aeration system. J.
optimum of applied research (Research Environ. Biol. 27(2),
voltage is considered contract number 167–183.
to be 12 Volt. 215/UN48.15/LT/201 8. Coria G., Nava J.L.,
7). Carreno G., 2014.
Electro- oxidation of
diclofenac in
CONCLUSION synthetic
REFERENCES pharmaceuti- Makna cal temuan
Electrochemical wastewater using an
1. Akarsu C., Ayol A.,
oxidation with multi electrochemical
Taner F. 2017. reactor equipped with
carbon electrodes was Treatment of
found to be effective boron doped diamond
domestic wastewater electrode. J. Mex.
in removing the COD by using Chem. Soc. 58(3),
from the restaurant electrochemical 303–308.
wastewater. The deg- process using
different metal 9. Huitle C.A.M., de
radation process was Moura D.C., da
carried out in electrodes. JSM En-
viron. Sci. Ecol. Silva D.R. 2014.
electrochemi- cal Applicability of
5(2), 2–6.
oxidation reactor with electrochemical
2. Azeroual N., Dani oxidation process to
ten carbon electrodes
A., Bejjany B., the treatment of
arranged in a parallel Mellouk H., Digua
system. The results petrochemical
K. 2017. Effect of effluents. Chem.
revealed that 92.84% the mixing velocity Eng. Transactions.
199
21, 373–378. electrochemical
10. Krzeminska D., oxidation of
Neczaj E., Borowski catechol in chloride
G. 2015. Ad- vanced medium for
oxidation processes wastewater Hasil yang dicapai
for food industrial treatment
waste- water application. En-
decontamination. J. viron. Eng. Res.
Ecol. Eng. 16(2), 61– 9(6), 279–287.
71 16. Subramaniam D.,
11. Najafpoor A.A., Halim A.A.,
Davoudi M., Hanafiah M.M. 2016.
Salmani E.R. 2017. Performance of
Decolorization of electrochemical
synthetic textile oxidation in treating
wastewater us- ing textile industry
electrochemical cell wastewater by graph-
divided by cellulosic ite electrode. Nat.
sepa- rator. J. Environ. Pollut.
Environ. Health Sci. Tech. 15(3), 1021–
Eng. 15(11), 2–11. 1026.
12. Naje A.S., 17. Zayas T., Picazo M.,
Chelliapan S., Salgado L. 2011.
Zakaria Z., Abbas Removal of or- ganic
S. 2015. matter from paper
Enhancement of mill effluent by
electrocoagulation electrochem- ical
process for the oxidation. J. Water
treatment of textile Resource. Prot. 3, 32–
wastewater under 40.
com- bined 18. Zulaikha A., Lau
electrical W.J., Ismail A.F.,
connections using Jaafar J. 2014.
titanium plates. Int. Treatment of
J. Electrochem. Sci. restaurant wastewater
10, 4495–4512. using ultrafil- tration
13. Rada E.C., Istrate and nanofiltration
I.A., Ragazzi M., membranes. J.Water
Andreottola G., Pro- cess Eng. 2, 58–
Torretta V. 2013. 62
Analysis of electro
oxidation
suitability for
landfill leachate
treatment through
an experimental
study.
Sustainability. 5,
3960–3975.
14. Rajeshwar K., Ibanez
J.G. 1997.
Environmental elec-
trochemistry;
Fundamentals and
applications in pol-
lution abatement.
Academic Press, Inc.
California.
15. Rajkumar D., Kim
J.G., Kim K.K.
2004. Study on
200

You might also like