Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Saes X 700 Sa Standard
Saes X 700 Sa Standard
1 Scope............................................................. 3
2 Conflicts and Deviations................................. 4
3 References..................................................... 4
4 Definitions ……………………………………… 5
5 Design............................................................ 8
6 Installation, Commissioning and Inspection. 22
Tables
Table_1A – CP Current Requirement for Gas Well Casings
Table_1B – CP Current Requirement for Water Injection and Oil Well Casings
Table_1C – CP Current Requirement for Water Supply Well Casings
Table_2 – Impressed Current Anode Consumption Rates and Nominal Design Current Densities
Table_3 – Impressed Current HSCI Anode Data
Table_4 – Minimum Distance to Nearest Cathodically Protected Structure
Table_5 – Resistance of Casings to Remote Earth & Back EMF of Casings
Page 2 of 30
Document Responsibility: Cathodic Protection SAES-X-700
Issue Date: 7 October 2009
Next Planned Update: 7 October 2014 Cathodic Protection of Onshore Well Casings
1 Scope
1.1 This standard prescribes the minimum mandatory requirements governing the
design and installation of cathodic protection (CP) systems for onshore metallic
well casings.
Commentary Notes:
The cathodic protection requirements for offshore well casings are beyond the
scope of this Standard and are addressed in SAES-X-300.
1.2 Onshore oil, gas, water injection, and water supply well casings with a predicted
life expectancy greater than five years shall be provided with impressed current
cathodic protection (ICCP) if:
a) The well casing is installed through a corrosive formation, or
b) The well casing is not installed through a corrosive formation but has a
permanent buried metallic flow-line. In this situation, sufficient ICCP
shall be provided to maintain the flow-line at an acceptable protection
level without electrical isolation of the well casing from the flow-line.
Commentary Note:
1.3 A metallic well casing that is not installed through a corrosive formation and
does not have a permanent flow-line does NOT require cathodic protection.
However, if a foreign impressed current anode bed is within 500 meters of this
type of well, electrical bonding shall be implemented to minimize the
probability of downhole interference.
1.4 A metallic well casing that has not been coated with Fusion Bonded Epoxy
(FBE) and is installed within a metallic or non-metallic cellar and backfilled
shall be provided with two prepackaged 27.5 kg (60 lb) magnesium anodes
installed inside the wellhead cellar.
Commentary Note:
Do not install galvanic anodes for well casings that do not have cellars or are
installed in cellars that are not backfilled, or for well casings that are FBE coated
through the cellar area.
Page 3 of 30
Document Responsibility: Cathodic Protection SAES-X-700
Issue Date: 7 October 2009
Next Planned Update: 7 October 2014 Cathodic Protection of Onshore Well Casings
1.5 This standard shall not be attached to, nor made a part of a purchase order.
2.1 Any conflicts between this standard and other applicable Company Engineering
Standards, Material Specifications, Standard Drawings, or forms shall be
resolved in writing by the Design Agency representative through the Company
Cathodic Protection (CP) Subject Matter Expert (SME).
2.2 Requests to deviate from this Standard shall be submitted electronically through
the SAP Waiver Process in accordance with SAEP-302, “Instructions for
Obtaining a Waiver.”
3 References
Referenced standards and specifications shall be the latest edition/revision unless stated
otherwise.
Page 4 of 30
Document Responsibility: Cathodic Protection SAES-X-700
Issue Date: 7 October 2009
Next Planned Update: 7 October 2014 Cathodic Protection of Onshore Well Casings
Bond Cable: A cable installed between two metallic structures to provide electrical
continuity between the structures.
Page 5 of 30
Document Responsibility: Cathodic Protection SAES-X-700
Issue Date: 7 October 2009
Next Planned Update: 7 October 2014 Cathodic Protection of Onshore Well Casings
CP System Operating Circuit Resistance: The total effective resistance seen by the
output terminals of the respective cathodic protection power supply, or the total
working resistance in a galvanic anode system.
CP System Rated Circuit Resistance: The cathodic protection power supply rated
output voltage divided by the rated output current. For photovoltaic power supplies, the
rated output current for this calculation is the design commissioning current.
Deep Anode Bed: Anode or anodes connected to a common CP power supply installed
in a drilled hole with a depth exceeding 15 m (50 ft).
Design Agency: The organization completing the detailed design of the project. The
Design Agency could be a Design Contractor, a Lump Sum Turn Key Contractor or an
in house design organization.
Hazardous Areas: Those areas where fire or explosion hazards may exist due to
flammable gases or vapors, flammable liquids, combustible dust, or ignitable fibers or
filings (see NEC Article 500).
Impressed Current Anodes: Anodes fabricated from materials such as High Silicon
Cast Iron (HSCI) or Mixed Metal Oxide (MMO) that are connected through a DC
power supply to the buried structure to provide cathodic protection current.
Page 6 of 30
Document Responsibility: Cathodic Protection SAES-X-700
Issue Date: 7 October 2009
Next Planned Update: 7 October 2014 Cathodic Protection of Onshore Well Casings
Perimeter Fence: The fence which surrounds an area designated for a distinct function.
Pipeline: The term "pipeline" is used generically in this Standard and can be used to
refer to any type of pipeline.
Plant Area: A plant area is the area within the plot limits of a process or storage
facility.
Plot Limit: The plot limit is the boundary around a plant or process facility. The plot
limit may be physical such as a fence, a wall, the edge of a road or pipe rack, chains and
posts or a boundary indicated on an approved plot plan.
Process Pipeline: A pipeline typically associated with a Plant process and typically
above ground within a Plant facility.
Production Pipeline: A pipeline transporting oil, gas or water to or from a well. These
include flow-lines, test-lines, water injection lines and trunk-lines.
RSA: Responsible Standardization Agent - usually the Saudi Aramco CSD cathodic
protection Subject Matter Expert.
Subject Matter Expert (SME): For the purposes of this standard, the SME shall be
the assigned Consulting Services Department cathodic protection specialist.
Page 7 of 30
Document Responsibility: Cathodic Protection SAES-X-700
Issue Date: 7 October 2009
Next Planned Update: 7 October 2014 Cathodic Protection of Onshore Well Casings
Test-line: A pipeline that is used for testing an individual well or group of wells.
Utility-line: A pipeline designed to deliver an end use service product (typically water,
gas or air).
5 Design
5.1.2 The design agency shall not issue drawings for construction until the
drawings have been reviewed and approved in writing by CSD and the
CP Proponent organization.
5.1.3 The 90% Detailed Design package submitted for review shall contain:
a) The scope of work
b) A professionally drafted Index "X" CP drawing illustrating the
following details:
all cathodic protection equipment using the cathodic protection
symbols shown on Standard Drawing AD-036785 "Symbols for
Cathodic Protection"
the proposed location for each piece of CP equipment including
but not limited to rectifiers, anode beds, junction boxes, bond
stations, test stations, and bonds to structures
Page 8 of 30
Document Responsibility: Cathodic Protection SAES-X-700
Issue Date: 7 October 2009
Next Planned Update: 7 October 2014 Cathodic Protection of Onshore Well Casings
The Project Proposal should provide clear direction on the general design
approach with respect to the following:
The Project Proposal should clearly state if the designs will be based on:
The Project Proposal for well casings that require cathodic protection
should clearly state the general CP power supply requirements:
5.2.1 The design shall consider the complexities of the casing and the
operating environment, including:
a) Cathodic protection current required for mitigation of the external
corrosion in the respective area on the respective casing type
Page 9 of 30
Document Responsibility: Cathodic Protection SAES-X-700
Issue Date: 7 October 2009
Next Planned Update: 7 October 2014 Cathodic Protection of Onshore Well Casings
5.2.4 Permanent buried flare lines and/or blow down lines on a well pad shall
be made permanently electrically continuous with the well casing or the
negative circuit of the well casing cathodic protection system.
5.2.5 Anode beds for photovoltaic CP systems shall be sized to provide the
optimum economic combination of CP system circuit resistance and
photovoltaic array arrangement.
5.2.6 The design shall facilitate an integrated cathodic protection system for all
associated buried metallic structures, and shall comply with all spacing
and access restrictions detailed in SAES-B-062.
5.2.8 Uncoated well casings separated by less than 2 km may utilize a single
CP power source, provided the design protection criteria for each well as
stated in Tables 1A, 1B and 1C of this standard are met without the use
of electrical resistors.
Page 10 of 30
Document Responsibility: Cathodic Protection SAES-X-700
Issue Date: 7 October 2009
Next Planned Update: 7 October 2014 Cathodic Protection of Onshore Well Casings
Exception:
Commentary Note:
Coated well casings do not require a dedicated negative cable and are
not restricted by the 2 km separation imposed on CP systems with
multiple uncoated well casings.
5.2.9 At sites where one CP power source is used to protect multiple well
casings, each bare (uncoated) well shall have a dedicated negative cable
unless approved otherwise by the CP Proponent organization and a CP
Subject Matter Expert (SME) in CSD. The negative cables shall be
terminated in a negative junction box placed at a location selected to
optimize the current distribution between casings.
5.2.11 The CP system design shall take into consideration the calculated
operating resistance and shall size the positive and negative cables and
voltage rating of the rectifier such that the “calculated” operating output
of the rectifier complies with the following:
a) Achieves the target commissioning current at 30% to 70% of the
rectifier rated voltage output, and
b) Achieves the normal operating output current with the voltage
adjustment set at more than 10% of the available (rated) rectifier
voltage output.
Commentary Note:
Page 11 of 30
Document Responsibility: Cathodic Protection SAES-X-700
Issue Date: 7 October 2009
Next Planned Update: 7 October 2014 Cathodic Protection of Onshore Well Casings
5.2.12 A proposed well that will be located more than 3 kilometers from the
nearest 4.16 kV or 13.8 kV power line shall be considered for external
coating.
5.2.14 A cathodic protection rectifier located within 500 meters of a well that
does not have an energized cathodic protection system, or a flow-line, or
a cable providing continuity to the cathodically protected well
casing/pipeline network, shall be adjusted to operate at approximately
50% of the optimum operating current as described in Tables 1A, 1B and
1C of this Standard.
Commentary Note:
5.3.1 The anode bed shall be sized to discharge the CP power source rated
current at the anode consumption rate detailed in Table 2, for a minimum
of 20 years.
Page 12 of 30
Document Responsibility: Cathodic Protection SAES-X-700
Issue Date: 7 October 2009
Next Planned Update: 7 October 2014 Cathodic Protection of Onshore Well Casings
5.4.1 The cathodic protection system design shall provide the minimum design
currents detailed in Tables 1A, 1B and 1C of this Standard.
5.4.2 Well casings in fields that are not specifically covered in Tables 1A, 1B
or 1C shall be evaluated for cathodic protection requirements on a case
by case basis by the CP Proponent organization and the CP Subject
Matter Expert (SME) in CSD.
5.4.3 The protection criteria for commissioning and monitoring are detailed in
Tables 1A, 1B and 1C of this Standard.
5.4.4 Multi-well CP systems shall be designed with CP power supplies that are
sized with a minimum rated output equaling the sum of:
a) The commissioning current requirements listed in Tables 1A, 1B
and 1C, plus
b) The estimated current required for the flow-line & trunk-line
system, plus
c) A design current capacity surplus of 30%
Page 13 of 30
Document Responsibility: Cathodic Protection SAES-X-700
Issue Date: 7 October 2009
Next Planned Update: 7 October 2014 Cathodic Protection of Onshore Well Casings
Field Designation Minimum Current Minimum Optimum Minimum Current Minimum Optimum
CP Power Included Casing Casing CP Power Included Casing Casing
Supply For Current Operating Supply For Current Operating
Rating Flowline (amps) Current Rating Flowline (amps) Current
(amps) (amps) (amps) (amps) (amps) (amps)
Abu Jifan, Ghazal, Jufayn,
Khurais, Midrikah, Mazalij,
Nuayyim, Shaybah, Tinat,
Waqr
- Rectifier(2) 25 5 15 12-15 15 5 7 5-7
- Photovoltaic(1) 15 0 15 12-15 15 5 7 5-7
Haradh, Hawiyah,
Nujayman, Shedgum,
Uthmaniyah and all other
fields not listed above
- Rectifier(2) 50 5 40 35-40 50 5 35 30-35
- Photovoltaic(1) 45 5 40 35-40 45 5 35 30-35
Table 1B – CP Current Requirement for Water Injection and Oil Well Casings
Oil Production and Water Injection Well Casings
Cathodic Protection Current Requirements – Single Well
Bare Casing Coated Casing
Com- Com-
Design mission Monitor Design mission Monitor
Field Designation Minimum Current Minimum Optimum Minimum Current Minimum Optimum
CP Power Included Casing Casing CP Power Included Casing Casing
Supply For Current Operating Supply For Current Operating
Rating Flowline (amps) Current Rating Flowline (amps) Current
(amps) (amps) (amps) (amps) (amps) (amps)
Uthmaniyah
- Rectifier(2) 50 5 35 30-35 15 5 7 5-7
- Photovoltaic(1) 45 5 35 30-35 15 5 7 5-7
Abqaiq, Abu Ali, Abu
Hadriyah,Ain-Dar, Fadhili,
Fazran, Hawiyah,
Khursaniyah, Manifa,
Qatif, Safaniyah, Shedgum
- Rectifier(2) 35 5 25 20-25 10 5 3 2-4
- Photovoltaic(1) 25 0 25 20-25 7.5 2.5 3 2-4
Ginah, Haradh, Hawtah, `
Harmaliyah, Nuayyim,
Shaybah
- Rectifier(2) 25 5 15 12-15 10 5 3 2-4
- Photovoltaic(1) 15 0 15 12-15 7.5 2.5 3 2-4
Abu Jifan, Khurais, Mazalij
- Rectifier(2) 10 5 4 2-5 10 5 1 0.5-5
- Photovoltaic(1) 7.5 2.5 4 2-5 7.5 2.5 1 0.5-5
Page 14 of 30
Document Responsibility: Cathodic Protection SAES-X-700
Issue Date: 7 October 2009
Next Planned Update: 7 October 2014 Cathodic Protection of Onshore Well Casings
Field Designation Minimum Current Minimum Optimum Minimum Current Minimum Optimum
CP Power Included Casing Casing CP Power Included Casing Casing
Supply For Current Operating Supply For Current Operating
Rating Flowline (amps) Current Rating Flowline (amps) Current
(amps) (amps) (amps) (amps) (amps) (amps)
Abu Jifan, Khurais, Mazalij
- Rectifier(2) 10 5 2 1-3 10 5 0.5 0.2-0.5
- Photovoltaic(1) 7.5 2.5 2 1-3 7.5 2.5 0.5 0.2-0.5
All Other Fields(3, 4, 5)
- Rectifier(2) 10 1.5 6 5-7 10 1.5 1 0.5-1
- Photovoltaic(1) 7.5 1.5 6 5-7 7.5 1.5 1 0.5-1
Notes:
(1)
CP current requirements for the flow-lines and trunk-lines of well casings cathodically protected by photovoltaic systems
shall be determined on a site specific basis. If additional current is necessary it shall be added to the current specified in
Tables 1A, 1B and 1C.
(2)
The current required for the flow-lines and trunk-lines for AC powered "Rectifier" well casing CP systems has been included
in the "CP Power Supply Rating (amps)" detailed in Tables 1A, 1B and 1C. If the flow-line or trunk-line is greater than 15 km
long, additional current capacity requirements shall be determined through calculations completed in accordance with SAES-
X-400
(3)
Table 1C applies to water supply wells that extend through the wet UER formation such as typical Wasia water supply wells.
Wells that do not extend below the UER (or other known corrosive formation), do not require CP. Wasia water wells drilled in
areas where the UER is dry, do not require cathodic protection.
(4)
Regardless of the water well type, associated buried flow-lines must be cathodically protected in accordance with SAES-X-
400.
(5)
Water wells without cathodic protection, and within 500 meters of an impressed current CP system anode bed, or
cathodically protected well casing must be bonded to the negative circuit of the CP system and supplied with sufficient CP
current to ensure downhole interference does not create an external corrosion problem. In this regard, the ∆V measured
between the water well and the other protected structure within 500 meters should be less than 200mV measured with
extended lead wires, well head to protected structure.
Page 15 of 30
Document Responsibility: Cathodic Protection SAES-X-700
Issue Date: 7 October 2009
Next Planned Update: 7 October 2014 Cathodic Protection of Onshore Well Casings
5.5.5 Design parameters for impressed current anode characteristics for soil
applications shall be as detailed in Table 2.
Commentary Note:
5.5.6 The impressed current anodes most commonly used by Saudi Aramco
are listed in Table 3 below.
Page 16 of 30
Document Responsibility: Cathodic Protection SAES-X-700
Issue Date: 7 October 2009
Next Planned Update: 7 October 2014 Cathodic Protection of Onshore Well Casings
Commentary Note:
5.5.7 The current capacity of an anode bed shall be equal to or greater than the
design current for the associated CP power source and shall be calculated
as follows:
SA AB x Iφ Iθ
Where:
SA AB = The total surface area of all the anodes in the anode bed
I φ = Anode material nominal current density per Table 2
5.5.8 Adjacent anode beds powered from separate CP power sources shall be
separated by a minimum distance of 50 meters.
Page 17 of 30
Document Responsibility: Cathodic Protection SAES-X-700
Issue Date: 7 October 2009
Next Planned Update: 7 October 2014 Cathodic Protection of Onshore Well Casings
2) The "Rectifier Rated Output" values apply only to new CP systems being
installed by projects. In the case of new pipelines being too close to
existing anode beds, use the rectifier "nominal operating level" as the
output value for the distances in Table 4. Resolve such situations on a
case-by-case basis in consultation with CSD, and the proponent of the
CP system.
3) Multiple deep anode beds can be treated as individual anode beds if the
separation between the anode beds meets or exceeds the minimum
distances detailed in Table 4. Example: Two 50 amp deep anode beds
placed 75 meters apart can be installed 75 meters away from a buried
pipeline.
5.6.1 For a "rectifier", the CP system "rated" circuit resistance shall be defined
as the rectifier rated voltage, divided by the rectifier rated current. Rated
voltages and currents are as detailed on the manufacturer's data sheet/plate.
5.6.3 The CP system "operating" circuit resistance shall be defined as the total
effective resistance seen by the output terminals of the respective
rectifier or photovoltaic output control center (OCC), and for calculation
purposes shall include:
a) Anode bed resistance to ground.
b) Positive cable resistance from CP power source to anodes.
c) Negative cable resistance from CP power source to structure.
d) Resistance of the casing to remote earth for calculation purposes
shall be as shown in Table 5 below, unless site testing is completed
to verify a more accurate value. For detail designs of multiwell CP
systems, a site test for casing resistance to ground shall be completed
for at least one of each casing type in the respective field.
e) Effective resistance caused by 0.8 volts anode bed back emf plus
the structure back emf per Table 5 (example: 1.2 volts casing back
emf + 0.8 volts anode bed back emf = 2.0 volts total between the
anode with coke breeze backfill, and a coated steel casing).
Page 18 of 30
Document Responsibility: Cathodic Protection SAES-X-700
Issue Date: 7 October 2009
Next Planned Update: 7 October 2014 Cathodic Protection of Onshore Well Casings
Commentary Note:
Note 1: The values shown above in Table 5 are applicable to wells in the Qatif and
Khursaniyah areas. Areas with similar surface formation and casing
completion characteristics can be assumed to be similar for design purposes.
Field testing is required in other areas.
5.6.5 If the soil resistivities within a proposed anode bed vary by more than
100%, either additional anodes shall be provided, or, anodes of the same
composition with a higher current capacity can be placed in the low
resistivity areas so that no anode exceeds the maximum commission
current (Table 3).
Page 19 of 30
Document Responsibility: Cathodic Protection SAES-X-700
Issue Date: 7 October 2009
Next Planned Update: 7 October 2014 Cathodic Protection of Onshore Well Casings
5.6.8 For deep anode bed designs, drill stem resistance measurements and test
anode resistance measurements shall be recorded by the construction
contractor on the form contained in Appendix 2 of this standard and
submitted for review and analysis to the CP SME in CSD (or designate).
The drill stem and test anode measurements shall be taken in accordance
with the requirements detailed in Standard Drawing AA-036385. CSD
in consultation with the Groundwater Division shall determine the final
acceptable borehole depth, and anode distribution.
5.7.2 For hazardous (classified) areas, the design agency shall select a cathodic
protection DC power supply (and other CP system equipment) that
Page 20 of 30
Document Responsibility: Cathodic Protection SAES-X-700
Issue Date: 7 October 2009
Next Planned Update: 7 October 2014 Cathodic Protection of Onshore Well Casings
5.7.3 Rectifiers with NEMA Class 3R enclosures shall NOT be used inside
hydrocarbon plant areas, within 30 meters of the plant perimeter fencing
(outside), or within 1 km of a coastline.
5.7.4 The maximum allowed output rating for DC power supplies is 100 volts.
5.8 DC Cables
5.8.3 DC cables shall comply with the most recent edition of the National Fire
Protection Association NFPA 70, National Electric Code (NEC).
5.9 Monitoring
5.9.1 The column titled “Monitor” in Tables 1A, 1B, and 1C of this standard
shall be used as a guideline for adjusting the output of cathodic
protection systems to optimum current outputs for cathodically protected
well casings.
5.9.2 Where a remote monitoring system (RMS) is used, the design details for
the RMS shall be submitted to the CP SME in CSD and the CP
Proponent organization for review and approval. Mandatory design
details include:
a) A description of the existing CP RMS used by the respective CP
Proponent in the respective area (if applicable). The description
shall detail existing RMS hardware, software, communication
connectivity and protocols.
Page 21 of 30
Document Responsibility: Cathodic Protection SAES-X-700
Issue Date: 7 October 2009
Next Planned Update: 7 October 2014 Cathodic Protection of Onshore Well Casings
5.9.3 Locations where an existing useable RTU is within 500 meters of the CP
Power Supply
5.9.3.2 The CP RMS shall use signal transmitters and a circuit breaker
status switch as described below in section 5.9.7.
5.9.4 At locations where an existing useable RTU is not within 500 meters of
the CP power supply, the need for a remote monitoring system shall be
determined by the Project Group and the CP Proponent organization at
the Project Proposal stage, and shall be included in the design as required
by operational needs.
5.9.5 Remote monitoring systems designed with RMU’s shall comply with the
requirements of 17-SAMSS-018.
5.9.6 Cables and field wiring used for the remote monitoring systems shall
comply with SAES-P-104.
Page 22 of 30
Document Responsibility: Cathodic Protection SAES-X-700
Issue Date: 7 October 2009
Next Planned Update: 7 October 2014 Cathodic Protection of Onshore Well Casings
5.9.7.3 The wiring between the circuit breaker auxiliary switch, signal
transmitters and the RTU must be sized such that the resistance
is within the maximum load tolerance of the signal transmitter
(typically 600 ohms maximum).
5.10 Bonding
5.10.1 Well casings shall be electrically continuous with their associated piping.
Resistance bonding is not allowed.
Exception:
5.10.2 Electrically isolated flanged piping sections (spool pieces) installed in-
line for use with instrumentation or other applications shall be bonded
around using a metal bond strap fabricated to facilitate ease of
installation and removal.
Electrical isolation shall not be installed between a well casing and the
associated pipeline or flow-line.
Exception:
Page 23 of 30
Document Responsibility: Cathodic Protection SAES-X-700
Issue Date: 7 October 2009
Next Planned Update: 7 October 2014 Cathodic Protection of Onshore Well Casings
Revision Summary
7 October 2009 Major revision.
Page 24 of 30
Document Responsibility: Cathodic Protection SAES-X-700
Issue Date: 7 October 2009
Next Planned Update: 7 October 2014 Cathodic Protection of Onshore Well Casings
Page 25 of 30
Document Responsibility: Cathodic Protection SAES-X-700
Issue Date: 7 October 2009
Next Planned Update: 7 October 2014 Cathodic Protection of Onshore Well Casings
Field: ______ Well No.: _____ Submitted By: ____________ Date: ________
Design Data:
CP Power Supply Anode Hole(s) Anodes
Target Max. Type Target Maximum
DC Volts DC Amps Hole No.__ of __ TA-4 or 5
Number
Depth(m) Depth(m) Resistance Resistance
Drill Stem and Test Anode Resistance Measurement Data (Report directly as read from meter)
Drill Stem Test Anode
Depth (m) Soil Type Remarks
Resistance (ohms) Resistance (ohms)
Water level in the anode hole must be kept constant and within 1 meter of surface for all Drill Stem and Test anode measurements
6
9
12
15
18
21
24
27
30
33
36
39
42
45
48
51
54
57
60
63
66
69
72
75
Continued on next page.
Page 26 of 30
Document Responsibility: Cathodic Protection SAES-X-700
Issue Date: 7 October 2009
Next Planned Update: 7 October 2014 Cathodic Protection of Onshore Well Casings
Notes:
1. Measurement of the resistance of the existing anode bed (if applicable):
Use the well head cable used for the “Measurement Equipment” to measure the resistance between
the existing anode bed and the well head.
Record the resistance measured as shown on the meter.
2. Measurement of the resistance of the calibration cable:
Use 25 meters of two-wire #14 AWG cable for this measurement.
Uncoil the cable and measure the resistance with the Megger.
This resistance should be less than 0.05 ohms.
3. Measurement of the resistance of the well head connection:
Use 300 meters of two-wire #14 AWG cable.
Fasten one end both wires securely to the well head with a mechanical clamping device.
Clean and file the contact surface on the well head before clamping the cable.
Uncoil the cable and in one single loop, bring the other end of the cable back to the well head.
Connect one of the #14 AWG wires to terminal C1 of the Megger the other wire to terminal P1..
Connect terminals C2 and P2 with the 25 meter two-wire #14 AWG cable to a flange or flange bolt on
the well head (do not connect to the mechanical clamp used for the other end of this cable).
This resistance should be approximately 0.05 to 0.10 ohms depending on the quality of the
connections.
There should be absolutely NO SPLICES in the cables. If a longer cable is required, use a longer
cable and record the length and size on the form sheet.
4. Measurement of the resistance of the cable connected to the test anode
Uncoil the cable and loop the cable end back towards the anode in a single loop
Connect terminals C1 and P1 of the Megger to one of the strands of copper from the end of the cable.
Connect a short wire from terminals C2 and P2 of the Megger to the end of the anode with a clamp.
This resistance should be approximately 0.14 to 0.16 ohms depending on the calibration cable
resistance and ambient temperature.
5. Measurement of the resistance of the drill stem to the drill truck.
This is only necessary if connection is being made to the drill truck instead of the drill stem for drill
stem resistance measurements.
Connect one of the wires from the 25 meter cable to terminals C1 and the other wire to terminal P1.
Connect a short piece of wire from C2 and P2 to the drill stem with a clamp.
The resistance should be approximately equal to the resistance of the calibration cable, i.e., less than
0.05 ohms.
Page 27 of 30
Document Responsibility: Cathodic Protection SAES-X-700
Issue Date: 7 October 2009
Next Planned Update: 7 October 2014 Cathodic Protection of Onshore Well Casings
A3.3.1 Well casing corrosion in the Arabian Gulf area is typically caused by long
line corrosion currents that are generated between two or more down-hole
formations. The shallowest of these formations is typically more than
Page 28 of 30
Document Responsibility: Cathodic Protection SAES-X-700
Issue Date: 7 October 2009
Next Planned Update: 7 October 2014 Cathodic Protection of Onshore Well Casings
1000 feet deep and the area where the corrosion occurs usually only
involves one or two lengths of casing.
A3.3.2 Corrosion in these areas does not typically happen on all wells with good
cement coverage through all formations. Corrosion can typically be
attributed to poor quality cement in the casing/bore-hole annulus in the
affected area, and can be amplified by the presence of flowing conditions
in the formation or acid gases in the area of the cement deficiencies. The
aforementioned conditions cannot be measured or detected by surface
measurement techniques such as E Log I measurement procedures, and
cannot be modeled using only formation resistivities and casing data.
A3.3.3 The most reliable method (and arguably the only reliable method) of
determining the amount of cathodic protection current required to mitigate
external casing long line corrosion in a downhole formation is to run a
cathodic protection evaluation log (Note: cathodic protection evaluation
logs are not effective for localized corrosion cells). Cathodic protection
evaluation logs have been run by Saudi Aramco in the following fields;
Abqaiq, Abu Ali, Ain Dar, Haradh, Hawiyah, Hawtah, Marjan, Nuayyim,
Qatif, Safaniyah, Shaybah, Shedgum, and Uthmaniyah.
A3.3.4 Before cathodic protection is turned on; a cathodic protection evaluation
log can be run to identify corrosive formations. However, due to the time
delay for polarization of the casing, a log that is run to identify the areas of
external corrosion cannot be immediately followed by a second log to
determine the quantity of cathodic protection current required to overcome
the corrosion currents.
A3.3.5 A cathodic protection evaluation log can be run to determine the amount of
cathodic protection required to mitigate long line corrosion currents but a
nominal amount of cathodic protection must be applied preferably two
weeks or more in advance of running the log.
When running the log, the actual amount of current going to the casing
must be measured with a current clamp placed around the casing. It
would be misleading to use the output current of the CP power supply
because the flow-line (must be bonded to the casing) and surface
facilities associated with the rig will also take some of the current.
The flow-line for the well will typically be physically disconnected
during the logging procedures and must be bonded to the well head
with a bond cable for the logging to accurately simulate actual
operating conditions. This bond should be in place preferably
immediately after the flowline is disconnected from the well head. If
the bond is not installed, interference currents from nearby CP systems
that would not occur when the flow-line is connected may occur when
Page 29 of 30
Document Responsibility: Cathodic Protection SAES-X-700
Issue Date: 7 October 2009
Next Planned Update: 7 October 2014 Cathodic Protection of Onshore Well Casings
Page 30 of 30