Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Durability Prediction of NR/BR and NR/SBR Blend Tread Compounds Using Tear Fatigue Analyser
Durability Prediction of NR/BR and NR/SBR Blend Tread Compounds Using Tear Fatigue Analyser
2 3
30°C
70°C
30°C
70°C
Fig. 2: FCG plots of NR/BR and NR/SBR blends at 30 and 70°C. Fig. 3: FCG plots of NR/BR and NR/SBR blends at 0 and 0.14 r-ratios.
Influence of waveforms on FCG of NR/BR sent work, crack growth rates are calcu- References
and NR/SBR blends lated at equal tearing energy level of 1.5 [1] R. S. Rivlin and A. G.Thomas, J. Polym. Sci. 10
Figure 4 depicts the effect of waveform N/mm for these blends and shown in (1953) 291.
on FCG characteristics. It can be observed Figure 5. It can be seen that in all the [2] G. J. Lake and P. B. Lindley Rubb. Chem.
that FCG rate is significantly higher in cases NR/BR blend scores much better Technol. 39 (1966) 348.
pulse mode compared to sine waveform with respect to durability compared to [3] A. N. Gent AN, P. B. Lindley, A. G. Thomas,
in both the blends. The previous resear- NR/SBR blend. Rubb. Chem. Technol. 38 (1965) 292.
chers [14, 15] also made similar observa- [4] N. Qazvini, N. Mohammadi, A. Jalali, A. Va-
tions for some of the rubbers. However, Conclusion rasteh, Rubb. Chem. Technol. 75 (2002) 77.
the assigned causes as reported for The influence of temperature, r-ratio [5] G. R. Hamed, H. J. Kim, A. N. Gent, Rubb.
showing such behaviour are not very and waveforms on FCG characteristics Chem. Technol. 69 (1996) 807.
conclusive. The difference in test condi- of NR/BR and NR/SBR blend based [6] M. P. Lee Rubb. Chem. Technol. 66 (1993) 304.
tions (strain rate, relaxation time etc.) tread compounds is discussed in detail. [7] P . Ghosh, R. Stocek, M. Gehde, R. Mukhopad-
between sine and pulse mode may be The significant influence of these para- hyay, R. Krishnakumar, Int. J. Frac. 188, (2014) 9.
taken into consideration to explain this meters on FCG characteristics was ob- [8] U. Eisele, S. A. Kelbch, H. W. Engels, KGK 45
behaviour. It is very obvious that in pulse served in both the blends. However, the (1992) 1064.
mode, the loading is very fast as the du- degree of influence is found to be diffe- [9] R. Stoček , G. Heinrich, M. Gehde, A. Rau-
ration is only of 20 milliseconds compa- rent in these two blends. Overall NR/BR schenbach , J. Plast. Technol. 1 (2012) 2.
red to sine mode which spans 100 mil- blend achieved superior crack growth [10] B . N. J. Persson, O. Albohr, G. Heinrich, H. Ue-
liseconds. This implies five times higher resistance and hence better durability ba, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 17 R1071 (2005).
strain rate in pulse mode than sine which in all respect compared to NR/SBR [11] P. Ghosh, A. Saha, P. C. Bohara, R.
could lead to instantaneous increase of blend. Mukhopadhyay, ECCMR V (2007)
crack tip temperature and in turn higher [12] G. J. Lake and P. B. Lindley , Rubb. Chem.
crack growth rate. Acknowledgement Technol. 38 (1965) 301.
From the results discussed so far, it This work was supported by the Ministry [13] N. Saintier,G. Cailletaud, R. Piques, Mat. Sci.
has been observed that FCG rates are of Education, Youth and Sports of the Eng. A, 528 (2011) 1078.
higher in NR/SBR blend compared to Czech Republic – Program NPU I (LO1504). [14] R. J. Harbour, A. Fatemi, W. V. Mars , Rubb.
NR/BR blend. This is in conformity with The authors thank the Managing Com- Chem. Technol. 80 (2007) 838.
the earlier findings made by Bhowmick mittee of Hari Shankar Singhania Elasto- [15] G . Andreini, P. Straffi, S. Cotugno, G. Gallone, G.
et al [16] where NR/SBR blend showed mer & Tyre Research Institute (HASETRI) Polacco, Rubb. Chem. Technol. 83 (2010) 391.
much inferior crack growth resistance for permission to publish this research [16] A. K. Bhowmick and S. K. De, Rubb. Chem.
compared to NR/BR blend. For the pre- work. Technol. 53 (1980) 960.
4 5
Fig. 4: FCG plots of NR/BR and NR/SBR blends at sine and pulse mode. Fig. 5: Crack growth rate at 1.5 N/mm tearing energy.