Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Invention of Pornography
The Invention of Pornography
Journal of the Hisrory of the Behavioral Sciences: Vol. 32(3),259 -261 July 1996
0 1996 John Wilcy & Sons, Inc. CCC 0002-5061/96/030259-03
Lynn Hunt, Ed. The Invention of Pornography: Obscenity and the Origins of Modernity,
1500-1800. N Y Zone Books, 1993. 411 pp. $26.95 (cloth) (Reviewed by Timothy J.
Gilfoyle)
motivated pornography reached its zenith in the French Revolution. A cascade of obscene
pamphlets, many depicting Marie Antoinette in sexually-exposed roles, culminated in the
writings of the Marquis de Sade.
The politics of obscenity even differed among European countries. For example,
Wijnand W. Mijnhardt found little pornography in the Dutch Republic. The bourgeois char-
acter of Dutch society was decisive in explaining its absence. A wider consensus in law, pol-
itics, and sexual morality among social groups simply made pornography less useful as a
political weapon.
The Invention of Pornography moves the obscene pamphlet and the censored print from
the margins of social and literary history to center. stage. To understand pornography is to
fathom modernity. Pornography emerged in the sixteenth century, developed concomitantly
with print culture, relied on themes from antiquity, spoke to the same public that read scien-
tific journals and novels, and charted changing attitudes toward the human body, sexual be-
havior, and republican government. A vehicle to criticize religious and political authority,
pornography expanded in periods of social turmoil and was directly associated with demo-
cratic movements.
By historicizing the subject, the authors persuasively show that pornography’s assump-
tions change. The obscene has not always structured domination upon gender, as many cur-
rent commentators a ~ s u m e . ~Eighteenth-century pornography, as Norberg argues,
emphasized sexuality, not sex. While obscene literature constructed a fictional universe built
around crude and even violent images of domination, it assumed a plurality of forms.
Pornography did not make women the sole victims or objects.
The paradoxical meanings of early modern pornography raise new and provocative
questions for future research. Like Restoration England, nineteenth-century American
brothel guides satirized certain social movements and turned prostitution into an idolatrous
religion. What political meanings were attached to brothels labeled “temples to Venus” or
prostitutes called nun^?"^ If political pornography declined because of its incompatibility
with new ideals of domesticity, does the rise of “hard-core” pornography throughout the
twentieth-century West reflect the deterioration of those same ideals? Do pornographic car-
toons of Jerry Falwell or George Bush “in drag” personify important critiques of late twenti-
eth-century politics? Indeed, can the entirety of pornographic literature since 1800 be
explained solely as an outlet for male genital gratifi~ation?~
Such questions and their answers are full of irony and ambiguity. Indeed, Lynn Hunt
demonstrates that pornography and democracy have a paradoxical relationship. Initially
written for elite, urban, aristocratic, libertine male audiences, pornography after 1700 broad-
ened into republican discourses. At other times, notably in the English Civil War and French
Revolution, royalist newspapers employed sexual slander to attack revolutionary govern-
ment. Democratic themes of social equality persisted. In most cases, however, this populism
was gender-specific. Pornography was almost always a leveling for men. Women remained,
in more ways than one, on the bottom.
NOTES
1. For works that make such distinctions, see Roger Thompson, Unfit For Modest Ears: A Study of Pornographic,
Obscene and Bawdy Works Written or Published in England in the Second Half of the Seventeenth Century (Lon-
don: Macmillan, 1979); Iain McCalman, Radical Underworld: Prophets, Revolutionaries and Pornographers in
London, 179.5-1840 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), esp. pp. 205-231.
2. See Robert Damton, The Literary Underground of the Old Regime (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,
1982); Peter Wagner, Ed., Erotica in the Enlightenment (Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang, 1991).
BOOK REVIEWS 26 1
Journal of the History of fhe Behavioral Sciences: Vol. 32(3), 261 -263 July 1996
0 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. CCC 0002-5061/96/030261-03
Stephen J. Stein. The Shaker Experience in America: A History of the United Society of
Believers. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992. 554 pp. $ 40.00 (cloth) (Reviewed
by A. Gregory Schneider)
In this major work, Stephen J. Stein presents the first comprehensive history by a pro-
fessional historian of the Shakers, from their beginnings to the present day. It is a monumen-
tal effort that deserves most of the encomiums that adorn its dustcover. The praise it perhaps
does not deserve and the way in which it falls short will be the topic at the end of this review.
Stein takes his professionalism very seriously in this book. From first to last he is self-
conscious and explicit about the professional historian’s duty to be critical, to debunk myths,
to cut through sentimentalized images, and to present only verifiable historical facts. In par-
ticular, he is determined to put an end to the fantasy of the Shaker village as an arts and
crafts utopia.
The way he organizes his book reflects this pervasive commitment. He divides Shaker
history into five periods and his book into five parts, each part dealing with a particular pe-
riod. He eschews what he deems to be subjective criteria for the periodization of Shaker his-
tory -success and failure, prosperity and decline-in favor of more objective public events
like the death of leaders and the opening or closing of villages. Part one of the book, further-
more, which is devoted to the “Age of the Founders, 1747-1787,” is much shorter than
might be expected. This is because Stein attempts to “slice through the layers of tradition
that surround this early period and, in doing so” greatly reduces the body of historical detail
that can be verified (xv). Stein challenges members of his profession to follow him in doing
source criticism and searching for the historical Ann Lee, Shaker founder, rather than accept-
ing hagiographic depictions of her.
This approach dictates greater attention and space devoted to the second period of
Shaker history, what Stein terms the “formative period,” 1787- 1826. The leaders and activi-
ties of this period, argues Stein, have been overshadowed by the myth of the founders. Yet
these were the people and the actions that created classical Shakerism.
Stein labels the third period, 1827-1875, “the maturation and revitalization of the soci-
ety.” His treatment of the period does much to establish his contention that the Shakers, con-
trary to popular images of them as paragons of spiritual harmony, “were an extremely
factious people” (xiv). Stein finds some of the most fascinating evidence of factiousness in
the outbreak of spiritualistic frenzy called “Mother Ann’s work.” He is also convinced that