Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ligeia Love Peer Editing For Causal Proposal Redux Passion Project Transcript
Ligeia Love Peer Editing For Causal Proposal Redux Passion Project Transcript
Manuscript Form
Consider the following, and mark problems on the paper:
Is the paper double spaced?
Is there an extra line between paragraphs? There should not be.
Are the heading and headers in the right format?
Does the title reflect the main idea of the thesis?
Introductory Paragraph
Does the writer use the assigned thesis pattern?
Does the introduction make sense? Does it include enough background information to let the reader
understand the thesis? Does it introduce the writer, the website, and the topic?
Is the thesis sentence the last sentence of the introductory paragraph?
What needs to be done to improve the introduction?
All of the items above were done correctly.
Body Paragraphs
Are there eight body paragraphs? Yes, there are 8 body paragraphs
Conclusion Paragraph
Is there a conclusion paragraph? NO, this paper does not require one.
Body Paragraphs
Consider the following, and mark problems on the paper:
Does each body paragraph have a topic sentence?
Is the topic sentence the first sentence in the paragraph?
Does the topic sentence identify the main idea of the paragraph and reflect the overall focus of the
thesis?
Do the topic sentences follow the instructions?
Do the body paragraphs follow the instructions?
Does the paragraph have enough information to prove the topic sentence?
Is there anything in any of the body paragraphs that doesn’t make sense?
How could each paragraph be improved?
After reading the paper I found that it followed the outline, the topic sentences were done correctly, and the
body paragraphs make sense. There is nothing that I think needs to be fixed with these paragraphs.
Outside Sources
Consider the following, and mark problems on the paper:
Is there a Works Cited page?
Are the entries on the Works Cited page in the correct format?
Is the Works Cited page in the correct format?
Are the sources acceptable?
Is each source listed on the Works Cited page? (Compare parenthetical documentation with Works
Cited page)
Is there anything on the Works Cited page that is not cited in the paper? (Compare parenthetical
documentation with Works Cited page)
Are the parenthetical citations in the correct format?
Are quotations properly introduced with a complete sentence and a colon?
Are all quotations documented?
Is there any undocumented information in the paper that looks as if it should be documented?
Do you see any other problems with the research elements in the paper?
Her works cited page is on its own page, it is in alphabetical order, the citations seem to be in the correct
form, and they match the parenthetical citations in the paper. All the quotes have a citations with them that
are in the correct format so her citations look great overall.