Experimental Evaluation of The Performance of Two-Stage Hot Cascade Type Vortex Tube When The Inlet Pressure, Length (L) /diameter (D) Ratio and Number of Nozzles Are Varied

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/336697386

Experimental Evaluation of the Performance of Two-Stage Hot Cascade Type


Vortex Tube when the Inlet Pressure, Length (L)/Diameter (D) Ratio and
Number of Nozzles are varied

Article  in  International Journal of Ambient Energy · October 2019


DOI: 10.1080/01430750.2019.1682040

CITATIONS READS

0 37

3 authors, including:

R. Madhu Kumar
Rajeev Gandhi Memorial College of Engineering and Technology
3 PUBLICATIONS   1 CITATION   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Microalgae Application on Diesel Engine View project

Passive devices are Performance Enhancers in Refrigeration system View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Katam Ganesh Babu on 19 August 2020.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AMBIENT ENERGY
https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2019.1682040

Experimental evaluation of the performance of two-stage hot cascade type vortex


tube when the inlet pressure, length (L)/diameter (D) ratio and number of nozzles are
varied
R. Madhu Kumara , N. V. V. S. Sudheerb and Katam Ganesh Babuc
a Research Scholar, ANU, School of Mechanical Engineering, R.G.M. College of Engineering & Technology, Nandyal, India; b Department of Mechanical
Engineering, RVR & JC College of Engineering, Guntur, India; c Faculty, Department of Mechanical Engineering, NIT Andhra Pradesh, Tadepalligudem,
India

ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY


The Vortex Tubes are broadly using in spot cooling applications such as less noise, space, and equipment Received 26 June 2019
costs are primary factors. In this experiment, two vortex tubes were used, and these two are hot cascade Accepted 8 October 2019
type vortex tube. Performance of hot cascade type vortex tube investigated experimentally at different inlet KEYWORDS
pressure, number of nozzles, and L/D ratios (10, 15, & 20). Based on the temperature difference between hot Coefficient of performance;
outlet 1 and inlet (T hot1. ), hot outlet 2 and hot outlet 1 (T hot2 ), cold outlet 1 and inlet (T cold1 ), cold outlet experiment; Ranque-Hilsch
2 and hot outlet 1 (T cold2 ) performance were analyzed. Coefficient of Performance (COP) investigated vortex tube; temperature
using experimental data. The COPc1 = 0.0203, COPh1 = 0.01884, COPc2 = 0.163, and COPh2 = 0.01893 difference
at temperature differences T cold1 = 8.2°C, T hot1 = 7.4°C, T cold2 = 26.3°C, and T hot2 = 17.2°C are
obtained better values at L/D = 15, Pi = 10 bar and N = 5 combination.

1. Introduction
this work, conformed exergy depends on gas pressure at the
A vortex tube is an equipment by which pressurised gas comes inlet, mass fraction, and velocity. Kirmaci (2009) investigated
to the compressor, and this gas separated into cold and hot by changing nozzle numbers and air pressure at the inlet to
flows. In vortex tube not include any moving components found the performance of a vortex tube and analyze exergy
besides the equipment positioned at the hot exhaust. By using of air. Dincer et al. (2011) done experimental work and calcu-
obstruction at hot exhaust flow of gas was controlled. Generally, lated exergy at different locations. They determined that the
vortex tubes used for spot cooling, i.e. cooling is providing at the exergy efficiency of the hot cascade vortex tube is more com-
lathe, drilling machine tools. In the vortex tube, two different pared to a single vortex tube at the same input. Selek et al.
temperature gases come at two exhausts. Various component (2011) were used vortex tube cold air to cool the lathe machine
parameters in the vortex tube influence the hot and cold gas cutting tool. They conducted experiments, in this experiment
temperatures. This equipment performance depended on the found the vortex tube performance, i.e. the temperature of cold
ratio of the length to diameter ratio, material, nozzle shape, noz- air and cutting tool of the lathe machine. Dincer and Baskaya
zle count and entering gas pressure are several factors Dincer (2009) conducted experiments by changing the plug angle of
et al. (2008a, 2008b). the vortex tube. They examined the vortex tube exergy effi-
The flow of gas in the vortex tube shown in Figure 1. The ciency took nozzle angle 300 , 450 , and 600 , and evaluated using
compressed gas enters into vortex chamber tangentially then a exergy method. So many scientists conducted experiments, ana-
steady vortex flow created in the tube. This flow strikes obstruc- lyzed, and theoretically studied on this device. Some of the scien-
tion at the hot end, some of the gas escape to the hot end, tists are Xue and Arjomandi (2008), Eiamsa-ard and Promvonge
and remaining gas returned to the cold end. The obstruction (2007), Krasae-in, Stang, and Neksa (2010), Lewins and Bejan
was a conical plug. Depend on plug adjustment quantity of hot (1999), Markal, Aydın, and Avci (2010), Saidi and Allaf Yazdi
and cold gas varied at two ends of the vortex tube. The frac- (1999), Sarhaddi et al. (2010), Secchiaroli et al. (2009), Ahlborn
tion of the mass of cold gas to the gas at the inlet, known as and Gordon (2000), Aljuwayhel, Nellis, and Klein (2005), Behera
the cold fraction. This conical plug movement and angle also et al. (2005), Casasa et al. (2010), Dincer et al. (2008c), Din-
one of factor influence the performance of vortex tube Xue and cer et al. (2008d), Dutta, Sinhamahapatra, and Bandyopdhyay
Arjomandi (2008). The vortex tube may be very beneficial for (2010), Farouk, Farouk, and Gutsol (2009), Frohlingsdorf and
specific programmes for this is straight forward, squeezed, mild, Unger (1999), Gao et al. (2005), Kirmaci, Uluer, and Dincer (2010),
noiseless in process, and require only air Eiamsa-ard, Wongcha- Pinar, Uluer, and Kirmaci (2009), Prommas, Keangin, and Rat-
ree, and Promvonge (2010). Experimental work is done by Dincer tanadecho (2010), Rakopoulos and Giakoumis (1997), Saidi and
et al. (2010), and in this work, by changing nozzles cross-section Valipour (2003), Uluer, Kırmaci, and Atas (2009), Wang, Li, and
area the exergy of the counter-flow vortex tube analyzed. In Zhao (2010), Wu et al. (2007).

CONTACT R. Madhu Kumar madhukumar325@gmail.com


© 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group

View publication stats

You might also like