Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 13

Critique of state intervention

•  Public sector is technically inefficient, bloated, overstaffed,


performs poorly and costly, and provides inadequate services

•  Public administration is distant, undemocratic, unresponsive, and


unaccountable to users, causing widespread dissatisfaction

•  Public sector provides patronage instead of service, employment


rather than goods and services

•  Public sector is corrupt and used to secure political support

Buse K, Mays N, Walt G. 2011


New Public Management – NPM

Doctrinal components of new public management


Doctrine Meaning
Hands-on professional management in Discretionary control of organizations from named
the public sector persons at the top, “free to manage”
Explicit standards and measures of Definition of goals, targets, indicators of success,
performance expressed in quantitative terms
Greater emphasis on output controls Resource allocation and rewards linked to measured
performance
Shift to disaggregation of units in the Break up of formerly “monolithic” units into corporatized
public sector units, operating on decentralized budgets and dealing
with one another on an “arms-length” basis
Shift to greater competition in public sector Move to term contracts and public tendering procedures
Stress on private-sector styles of Move away from military-style “public service ethic”,
management practice greater flexibility in hiring and rewards; greater use of PR
techniques
Stress on greater discipline and Cutting direct costs, raising labour discipline, resisting
parsimony in resource use union demands; public sector needs to do more with less

Hood C. 1991
Healthcare privatization an international
trend

The World Bank. World development report, investing in health. 1993


Healthcare privatization an international
trend
•  “In systems where both financing and delivery of care is a public
responsibility, efforts to distinguish the roles of health-care payers and
providers, so as to allow markets to function and generate efficiencies from
competition, have proved generally effective”

OECD. Towards high-performing health systems. 2004

•  “Among micro-level reforms, strengthening market mechanisms—increasing


patient choice of insurers, allowing greater competition between insurers,
relying on a greater degree of private provision, and allowing more
competition between providers—is particularly important to contain costs.
Management and contracting reforms, such as extending the use of
managed care or shifting toward case-based payments, are central to
improving the efficiency of spending”

IMF. Macro-fiscal implications of healthcare reform


in advanced and emerging economies. 2010
Defining Healthcare Privatization

POSSIBLE COMBINATIONS OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR


FINANCING AND PROVISION
FINANCING
PRIVATE NOT-FOR-
PUBLIC PRIVATE FOR-PROFIT
PROFIT
PROVISION

B) Public insurance C) General revenues


A) General tax
contributions used to used to purchase the
PUBLIC revenues used for
purchase the services of services of PFP
direct public provision
NFP providers providers
PRIVA
TIZAT
ION F) Private insurance
D) User fees paid for
E) User fees paid of NFP payments paid to
PRIVATE private use of public
facilities providers in private
facilities
practice

WHO task force on health economics 1995


Defining healthcare privatization

•  “Its too simple to conceptualize •  Decentralization (de-


privatization as a simple concentration / delegation /
dichotomy between public and devolution) Precursors of
privatization

private. Such a conceptualization •  Autonomization / Corporatization (healthcare


commersalisation,

would not only ignore the gray •  Regulated competition (or internal
marketisation)

area between public and private market policies or liberalization) /


but also disregard the evolutionary Managed competition
character of privatization”

•  “It is therefore useful to introduce •  Liquidation (or termination)


the notion of continuum ranging •  Contracting out (or outsourcing)
from precursors of privatization to •  Public-private partnerships Direct forms of

moderate or radical forms of (privatization of investment and healthcare


privatization

privatization” management)
•  Privatization of healthcare
financing

Maarse H. 2006 (readjusted)


Types of Healthcare Privatization

•  Termination (or liquidation): Liquidation of public and private not-


means that the State divests for-profit hospitals, Germany 2001-11
itself of public assets (like 2001 “Helios” bought the clinic of the city of
hospitals) to private owners. Erfurt
2003 “Helios” took over 94.9% of the
hospital of the city of Wuppertal
•  The primary objective of 2004 “Asklepios” bought the main hospital
liquidation is to reduce the group of the federal state of Hamburg

scope of public intervention 2006 “Rhon Klinikum AG” acquired the


university clinics of Mamburg and
and as a result reduce the Gieben
burden of public sector 2011 The county of Rottweil sold two
financing. municipal hospitals for €44m
2011 The city of Wiesbaden in Hesse
issued a tender for the acquisition of
a 49% share of its municipal hospital

WHO 1995, Maarse H. 2006 Holt E. 2012, Bohlke et al 2011


Types of Healthcare Privatization

Institute of Economic Affairs, April 2015


Types of Healthcare Privatization

•  Contracting out (or


outsourcing): involves shifting Contracted out clinical and non-clinical
partial or complete services, NHS UK 1983-2010
responsibility for the provision 1983 Hospital non-clinical support services
of clinical or non-clinical (catering, cleaning, laundry etc)
services to the private sector, 2000 Diagnostic services (CT and MRI
while the responsibility of scanning)
financing remains with the 2000 Elective surgery (through ISTCs -
public sector “Independent Sector Treatment
Centres”)

•  Contracting does not reduce 2002 Out-of-hours (OOH) GP services


the scope of public 2005 Regular primary care services (through
intervention. Governments APMS – “Alternative Providers of
retain their political Medical Services”)
responsibility over the 2006 Community health services
contracted services 2010 Blood transfusion service (storage,
collection and delivery of blood supplies)

WHO 1995, Maarse H. 2006 Lister J. 2013 (readjusted)


Types of Healthcare Privatization

•  Decentralization: refers to the


transfer of powers and Health system decentralization in Spain
responsibilities from the national Political power in Spain was devolved in 1978 to
to the local level 17 regions (Comunidades Autonomas-CAs)
Central government provides a common basic
•  De-concentration: refers to the framework for health and healthcare
transfer of administrative rather Each CA has a regional health department
than decision-making power to a and health minister responsible for health
lower level policy within the region

•  Delegation: is the transfer of Health policy responses to the current


administrative or policy initiation Eurozone crisis in Catalonia
power to a lower organizational 10% reduction of healthcare budget in 2011
level
Introduction of new user fees

•  Devolution: refers to the transfer Firing 1,500 temporary healthcare workers, cutting
salaries of 40,000 public health professionals
of full political power from national
to regional or local level Closure of 33% of hospital beds and 40% of
operating rooms

Bremner J 2011 Duran A 2011, Rada G 2011


Types of Healthcare Privatization

•  Autonomization: refers to the Main features of autonomized hospitals


establishment of local Day-to-day decision making is shifted from
healthcare providers as public hierarchies to hospital managers
autonomous, free-standing Autonomized hospitals are able to generate their
own revenues
corporate bodies
Autonomized hospitals become partial residual
claimants on certain savings generated
•  Autonomization shifts decision- through cost saving or other improvements

making control and often Hospital managers remain accountable to the


government but usually a bilateral agreement
revenue rights and maybe concluded with monitorable targets
responsibilities from central regarding performance

government agencies to the Social functions of the hospital are specified in


the agreement
provider level
Autonomized hospitals usually do not have any
control over recruitment, salaries or staff-mix,
their employees remain in the civil service

Preker A, Harding A. 2003 (readjusted)


Types of Healthcare Privatization

•  Regulated competition (or “Quasi” market reform of the Swedish


“quasi” or “internal” market healthcare system
policies): is the competition on Separation of “purchase” from “provision”
the supply side only, with within public services: by late 1980s Swedish
counties established committees and took up a
maintenance of a single source new role as purchasers of healthcare services
of public finance Establishment of more independent public
providers: (a) most public hospitals were
converted to publicly owned companies with
•  Managed competition (or enhanced managerial autonomy (b) few public
hospitals were sold to private operators (c)
“managed care”): is the primary care practitioners formed cooperatives
competition on both the supply Greater competition between providers
and funding (demand) sides of driven by “giving users more choice”: in 2009
the market under a new reform (referred as “choice of care”)
patients’ choice of a primary care centre
generated a capitation payment to the chosen
unit

McPake B et al 2002 Ovretveit J 2003, Dahlgren G 2008, Ahgen B 2010


Types of Healthcare Privatization

•  Public-Private Partnerships: Public-private hospital partnerships


“the term refers to forms of
UK By April 2009, 101 of the 133 new
cooperation between public hospitals built between 1997 and
authorities and the world of 2008, were privately financed
business which aim to ensure Europe $4 billion in hospital PPP deals were
the funding, construction, announced during the first half of
2010
renovation, management or
North Between 2005 and 2010 British
maintenance of an America Columbia, Ontario, and Quebec had
infrastructure” completed $10 billion in healthcare
PPP projects
Africa In South Africa the government was
planning to refurbish the giant 2,964-
bed Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital
through PPP

European Commission 2004 Pollock A, Price D. 2013, PWC 2010

You might also like