Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Progress Presentation

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA

40450 SHAH ALAM (Sustainability)- PO7 (15%)
SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN MEC532: MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DESIGN 2 [CO3]
Tel: 03-55435190 Fax: 03-55435160 UPDATE: Sept 2020
_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Project Title :

Group/Class : _______________________________ Supervisor/Lecturer : ______________________

Department : __________________________________________________

No
Student ID No. Name Signature
.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.

Progress assessment PO7 (Sustainability) 15%

Instruction:

To Student: Each group/ department is required to provide all evidences (i.e. picture(s) with
caption/description) for criteria (1-5) and present to panel during progress assessment day as planned
by coordinator.

To Panels: please evaluates accordingly with rubrics provided on shaded row with mark from 0 to 10
as maximum if criteria and evidence(s) are complete.

Final
Grade, (
Weight, score
Criteria Score
w (%) ×w
10
)
1. Sustainable Design Process and Planning 4.0
0-4 5-7 8-10
No planning concept Partially follow the Exactly follow the
planned concepts planned concepts
2. Design for Sustainable Manufacture 4.0
0-4 5-7 8-10
No product Partial product Complete product
blueprint/processes blueprint/processes blueprint/processes
3. Design for Sustainable Product Usage, Maintenance and End of Life
3.0
Disposal
0-4 5-7 8-10
No consideration on Product usage & Product usage &
product usage & maintenance are maintenance are
maintenance are considered considered
considered
4. Environmental Impact Criteria 2.0
0-4 5-7 8-10
Introduce more damage Partially reduces Very friendly to
to environment damages to environement
environment
5. Economic & Social Design Criteria 2.0
0-4 5-7 8-10
No benefit of product Product designed Product designed
designed benefits but cannot benefits and potential
 utilize the product to the customers in waiting
public

Assessed By : ________________________________________ (signature)

Name : ________________________________________

Date : _______________
Rubrics for Progress Presentation Report MEC 532 PO7 (15%)
Items/Components Poor (0-4)
1 Sustainable Design  Poor utilization sustainable design
Process and philosophy encourages decisions at each
Planning phase of the design process and
planning.
 No organizational chart, job scopes,
design process and Gantt chart
2. Design for  Poor design for sustainable manufacture
Sustainable during design phase, no process for
Manufacture fabrication on part/component/sub-
assembly/product adapt conservation
(cost/source).
 No proof of part/component/sub-
assembly/product blueprint.
3 Design for  Poor design for sustainable product
Sustainable Product usage and maintenance.
Usage,  No component simplicity and
Maintenance and standardization, poor accessibility for
End of Life Disposal
removal of components nor detail design
for quick and easy maintenance, design
for sustainable end of life disposal,
reduce, re-use/refurbish, recycle.
4 Environmental  Poorly addresses environmental impact
Fair (5-7)
 Adequately shows utilization sustainable
design philosophy encourages decisions
at each phase of the design process and
planning.
 Use of organizational chart, job scopes,
design process and Gantt chart.
 Adequately shows design for sustainable
manufacture during design phase which
includes process for fabrication on
part/component/sub-assembly/product
adapt conservation (cost/source).
 Provides proof of part/component/sub-
assembly/product blueprint.
 Adequately shows design for sustainable
product usage and maintenance.
 Provide simplicity of components and
standardization, accessibility for ease of
removal of components and detail design
for quick and easy maintenance, design
for sustainable end of life disposal,
reduce, re-use/refurbish, recycle.
 Adequately addresses environmental
Good (8-10)
 Clearly understand and shows excellent
utilization sustainable design philosophy
encourages decisions at each phase of
the design process and planning.
 Support with proper organizational chart,
job scopes, design process and Gantt
chart.
 Clearly shows excellent design for
sustainable manufacture during design
phase.
 Clearly shows proper process for
fabrication on part/component/sub-
assembly/product adapt conservation
(cost/source).
 Clearly provides proof of
part/component/sub-assembly/product
blueprint.
 Minimizing the number of parts, design
parts for ease of fabrication and
assembly
 Clearly shows excellent design for
sustainable product usage and
maintenance.
 Clearly provides simplicity of components
and standardization, clear accessibility for
ease of removal of components and
detail design for quick and easy
maintenance, design for sustainable end
of life disposal, reduce, re-use/refurbish,
recycle.
 Excellently addresses environmental
 Impact Criteria criteria such as to conserve and improve
natural ecosystems, while protecting
human health and well-being i.e.
atmosphere, ecosystem, health,
aesthetics etc. i.e. Less pollution.
 No evidence of environmental design
criteria such as less waste of materials
and consumables, minimizes natural
resource depletion, prevents waste,
protects natural ecosystems, uses
renewable energy sources, ensure that
all material/energy inputs/outputs are as
inherently safe and benign as possible.
5 Economic & Social  Poorly addresses the economic impact
Design Criteria with clear cost and/or cost-benefit
analysis.
 No evidence of requests/requirements.
impact criteria such as to conserve and
improve natural ecosystems, while
protecting human health and well-being
i.e. atmosphere, ecosystem, health,
aesthetics etc. i.e. Less pollution.
 Adequately shows environmental design
criteria such as less waste of materials
and consumables, minimizes natural
resource depletion, prevents waste,
protects natural ecosystems, uses
renewable energy sources, ensure that
all material/energy inputs/outputs are as
inherently safe and benign as possible.
 Adequately addresses the economic
impact with clear cost and/or cost-benefit
analysis.
 Provide evidence of
requests/requirements.
impact criteria such as to conserve and
improve natural ecosystems, while
protecting human health and well-being
i.e. atmosphere, ecosystem, health,
aesthetics etc. i.e. Less pollution.
 Clearly shows environmental design
criteria such as less waste of materials
and consumables, minimizes natural
resource depletion, prevents waste,
protects natural ecosystems, uses
renewable energy sources, ensure that
all material/energy inputs/outputs are as
inherently safe and benign as possible.
 Excellently addresses the economic
impact with clear cost and/or cost-benefit
analysis.
 Clearly addresses requests/requirements.