Why - Why analysis and actions

NC NC
no Identification no Standard Classification Statement of non-confirmity Standard clause Clause no Audit date Due date

Review of the
1 1 IATF 16949:2016 Minor The Process of customer related review of requirement is partially not effective requirements for 8.2.3.1 15.04.2021 15.06.2021
products and services

Why-1

Why-2

Why-3

Why-4

Why-5
Containment Target
Objective evidence Root cause action Corrective action date Responsibility

The Process of customer related Feasibility and risk analysis not In feasibility and risk analysis Feasibility and risk analysis Feasibility and risk Feasibility and risk Feasibility and risk New business enquiry will be
review of requirement is partially done for all customer required analysis format not analysis format not analysis format provided with revised 10.06.21 Aslam Khan
not effective parameters format all parameters not included format inadequate reviewed reviewed reviewed Feasibility & Risk analysis

No official communication Official communication The communication could not be Printouts taken & Printout of future
for requirement of product received thru mail retrieved in time Internet problem --- Internet problem filed communication will be filed 10.06.21 Aslam Khan
Customer requirement review is not
evident –No official communication with
customer for requirement of product as
well as other requirement of Sample
submission, PPAP submission.
Refer – new developed Project Enquiry other requirement of Sample Samples were already The communication could not be Printouts taken & Printout of future
No.-FRIL/16, Enquiry Date- 12.08.2020 submission Internet problem --- Internet problem 10.06.21 Aslam Khan
submitted retrieved in time filed communication will be filed
Butyl Inner Tube, 9.00-16.00 Customer
M/s-ATG
Also, Weight of product 10.00-20 was
revised from 4.15Kg to 3.80 Kg, Also , no
further review of cost revision due to other requirement of PPAP PPAP was not submitted to Documents required in PPAP, Documents not PPAP will be made with
reduction of weight 350g per tube submission customer FRIL was not asked to raise PPAP were not provided by customer --- provided by customer --- available documents for future 10.06.21 Aslam Khan
,however, no official communication supplies
from customer.
Refer- Weight change of tube 09.00 to
16.00 Customer M/s-ATG
Weight of product 10.00-20 was Official communication The communication could not be Internet problem --- Internet problem Printouts taken & Printout of future 10.06.21 Aslam Khan
revised from 4.15Kg to 3.80 Kg received thru mail retrieved in time filed communication will be filed

no further review of cost revision

due to reduction of weight 350g Official communication The communication could not be Internet problem --- Internet problem Printouts taken & Printout of future 10.06.21 Aslam Khan
per tube , received thru mail retrieved in time filed communication will be filed