RISK ASSESSMENT Company:

Internal Auditing Date of Assesment:

Risk Assessment Matrix Probability Criteria

Probability 3 Failure of the activity being audited is likely to
1 2 3 happen, often, frequent
Severity 1 1 2 3
2 2 4 6 2 Failure of the activity being audited can happen,
3 3 6 9 but not frequent
After rating each point the multiplication of the
severity and potential rating determines 1 Failure of the activity being audited is unlikely to
Notes wheather a point is high, medium or low in happen, rare, remote
regard to significance.

Point / Activity / Program Description of Point

1 SENIOR MANAGEMENT COMMITMENT Activites and management processes designed to ensure the
food safety systems are inplace, maintained and adequately
resourced

2 THE FOOD SAFETY PLAN – HACCP* Principles and practices of food safety risk assessment,
management and control

4.11 HOUSEKEEPING AND HYGIENE Covers housekeeping and cleaning systems to ensure

appropriate standards of hygiene are maintained at all times
and the risk of product contamination is minimised.
Requirements cover the high level prolicies and procedures
and not the specific cleaning programs themselves.
 GTG PLUS LTD Assessment Conducted By: B.Tamliani
8/1/2018 T.Kobalia

Risk Assessment Model

eria
ng audited is likely to
ng audited can happen,
ng audited is unlikely to
Severity Criteria Outcome Decision Critieria
3 Failure of the activity being audited is likely to lead High Audit the activity at a frequent level - mi
to an immediate / grave health impact, recall or every 3 months
regulatory issue
2 Failure of the activity being audited is unlikely to Medium Audit the activity at a reduced level - min
pose an immediate / grave risk to the consumer but every 6 months
repeated failure over time may
1 Failure of the activity being audited is unlikely to Low Audit the activity at a minimum level - m
pose an immediate / grave risk to the consumer. every 12 months

Risk Assessment

Risk Description Probability Severity Value Risk

These processes are high level and failure of the activites being 1 2 2 Low
audited do not pose an immediate

This requirement is critical to the proper identification and 3 3 9 High

control of hazards in the process and product. Failure of these
requirements are liekly to lead to a serious food safety or
compliance issue. It includes CCP's

Ensuring that cleaning and housekeeping systems are in place 2 2 4 Medium

and effective is a major requirement for producing safe and
legal food products. Individual hygiene failures may not lead to
an immiedately impact on safety however over time the
accumulated efffective may pose an issue.
 Scope: HACCP, PRP's, procedures and requirements of the BRC
standard

e Decision Critieria Special Points of Attention

tivity at a frequent level - minimum 1 Scope to include HACCP programme,
nths prerequisite programmes and procedures

tivity at a reduced level - minimum 2 All activities shall be audited at least annually
nths regardless of risk

tivity at a minimum level - minimum 3 Fundamentals to be audited a minimum of 6

onths months

Outcome of Risk Assessment / Decisions

Audit the activity at a minimum level - minimum every 12 months

Audit the activity at a frequent level - minimum every 3 months

Audit the activity at a reduced level - minimum every 6 months

 RISK ASSESSMENT MODEL Company:
Cleaning Programmes Date of Assesment:

Risk Assessment Matrix Probability Criteria

Probability 3 Failure of the cleaning activity is likely to happen,
1 2 3 often, frequent
Severity 1 1 2 3
2 2 4 6 2 Failure of the cleaning activity being can happen,
3 3 6 9 but not frequent
After rating each point the multiplication of the
severity and potential rating determines 1 Failure of the cleaning activity is unlikely to
Notes wheather a point is high, medium or low in happen, rare, remote
regard to significance.

Point / Activity / Program Description of Point

Species change-over Line 2 This is the cleaning programme employed between the
change over of line 2 between beef and pork fresh products.
Covers all food contact surfaces

Walls, floors, ceilings in high care area This is the cleaning program for the walls, floors and other
general surfaces not speciifcaly food contact

Storage Racking Final Product Chill Cleaning activities of storage racking in the finised product
stroage chill
 GTG PLUS LTD Assessment Conducted By: B. Tamliani
8/1/2018 T.Kobalia

Risk Assessment Model

eria
ctivity is likely to happen,
ctivity being can happen,
ctivity is unlikely to
Severity Criteria Outcome Decision Critieria
3 Failure of the cleaning activity is likely to lead to an High Clean at a frequent level - between prod
immediate / grave health impact, recall or with full verification (visual, ATP, photo,
regulatory issue and chemical)
2 Failure of the cleaning activity is unlikely to pose an Medium Clean at a reduced level - minimum dail
immediate / grave risk to the consumer but appropriate verification (Visual and ATP
repeated failure over time may
1 Failure of the cleaning activity is unlikely to pose an Low Clean at a minimum level - as appropria
immediate / grave risk to the consumer. visual verification

Risk Assessment

Risk Description Probability Severity Value Risk

There is a high risk of cross contamination between products 3 3 9 High
and in particular species material and dna. This will lead to an
immediate product recall and legal compliance issue.

These surfaces are not food contact but are in the high care 2 2 4 Medium
area. AN accumulation of poor cleaning standards over time
may increase the level of product contamination.

These are non food contact surfaces and product is fully 2 1 2 Low
enclosed therefore the risk due to failure of this cleaning
activities is low
 Scope: Routine cleaning programs all areas.

e Decision Critieria Special Points of Attention

equent level - between products
ification (visual, ATP, photo, micro
al)
educed level - minimum daily with
verification (Visual and ATP)
1 Special attention to food contact surfaces and
environmental cleaning in high-care/high-risk
areas
2 The frequency and methods of cleaning shall be
based on risk.

minimum level - as appropriate with 3 Appropriate verification depending on the risk.

ation Risk to include food safety, business risk and
potenital for customer recall due to legality

Outcome of Risk Assessment / Decisions

Line change over with species change to be clean at a frequent level - between
products with full verification (visual, ATP, photo, micro and chemical)

Clean at a reduced level - minimum daily with appropriate verification (Visual and atp)

Clean at a minimum level - clean weekly

 RISK ASSESSMENT MODEL Company:
Calibration Date of Assesment:

Risk Assessment Matrix Probability Criteria

Probability 3 Failure of calibration status is likely to happen,
1 2 3 often, frequent
Severity 1 1 2 3
2 2 4 6 2 Failure of calibration status can happen, but not
3 3 6 9 frequent
After rating each point the multiplication of the
severity and potential rating determines 1 Failure of calibration status is unlikely to happen,
Notes wheather a point is high, medium or low in rare, remote
regard to significance.

Point / Activity / Program Description of Point

grain moisture tester/Kett electric laboratory used for the checking of moisture in raw material-hazelnut
kernels

digital thermo -humidity meter Used to monitor the ambien temperature and humidity in
specific areas-sorting facility, stoarge area.

Mettler Balance AX234 Device used to weigh packaging waste

metal detector the device used to check the raw kernels and the end
product on metal
 GTG PLUS LTD Assessment Conducted By: B.Tamliani
8/1/2018 T.kobalia

Risk Assessment Model

eria
tus is likely to happen,
tus can happen, but not
tus is unlikely to happen,
Severity Criteria
3 Failure of calibration status is likely to lead to an
immediate / grave health impact, recall or
regulatory issue
2 Failure of calibration status is unlikely to pose an
immediate / grave risk to the consumer but
repeated failure over time may
1 Failure of calibration status is unlikely to pose an
immediate / grave risk to the consumer.
Outcome Decision Critieria
High Calibrate at a frequent level - daily calibr
checks against certified standard
Medium Calibrate at a reduced level - monthly ca
checks against certified standard
Low Calibrate at a minimum level - as approp
a minimum of annual certification

Risk Assessment

Risk Description Probability Severity Value Risk

The devices is used to monitor a CCP humidity critical limit. 3 3 9 High
Failure of the calibration status of the device is likely to lead to
a significant food safety issue - survivial of pathogens.

Used to monitor the air temperature The is low risk associated 2 2 4 Medium
with the failure of calibration status .

This device is not used in relation to any critical proces, 2 1 2 Low

controls or CCP. No risk associated with its use

The devices is used to monitor a CCP metal presence in final 3 3 2 High

product critical limit. Failure of the calibration status of the
device is likely to lead to a significant food safety issue - metal
in end product.
 Scope: All identified measuring devices, including new equipment

e Decision Critieria Special Points of Attention

a frequent level - daily calibration 1 special attention to devices used in CCPs
nst certified standard

a reduced level - monthly calibration 2 The frequency and methods shall be based on
nst certified standard risk.

a minimum level - as appropriate but 3

of annual certification

Outcome of Risk Assessment / Decisions

Calibrate at a frequent level - daily calibration checks against certified standard.

Calibrate at a reduced level - monthly calibration checks against certified standard

Calibrate at a minimum level - as appropriate but a minimum of annual certification

Calibrate at a frequent level - daily calibration checks against certified standard.

 RISK ASSESSMENT Company:
End of Line Metal Detection Date of Assesment:

Risk Assessment Matrix Probability Criteria

Probability 3 Metal contamination likely to happen, often,
1 2 3 frequent
Severity 1 1 2 3
2 2 4 6 2 Metal contamination can happen, but not
3 3 6 9 frequent
After rating each point the multiplication of the
severity and potential rating determines 1 Metal contamination is unlikely to happen, rare,
Notes wheather a point is high, medium or low in remote
regard to significance.

Point / Activity / Program Description of Point

Line 1 - Metal Contamination Line 1 used for RTE products

Line 2 - Metal Contamination Line 2 is used to process and package product X to a very high
specification.
 GTG PLUS LTD Assessment Conducted By: B.Tamliani
8/1/2018 T.Kobalia

Risk Assessment Model

eria
ely to happen, often,
n happen, but not
unlikely to happen, rare,
Severity Criteria Outcome Decision Critieria
3 Metal contamination is likely to lead to an High End of line metal detection required
immediate / grave health impact, recall or
regulatory issue
2 Metal contamination is unlikely to pose an Medium End of line metal detection advised unle
immediate / grave risk to the consumer but specifically required by the customer
repeated failure over time may
1 Metal contamination is unlikely to pose an Low End of line metal detection is not requir
immediate / grave risk to the consumer.

Risk Assessment

Risk Description Probability Severity Value Risk

There is no metal detection place. If metal contamination 3 2 6 Medium
occurs during production there is no adequate measure in place
to detect it.

There is an inline X-ray machine and 2 x fine sieves which are 1 2 2 Low
capable of controlling the risk of metal contamination to an
acceptable level.
 Scope: Requirement to have in place metal detection systems

e Decision Critieria Special Points of Attention

metal detection required 1 If customer requirements state, end of line metal
detection is required

metal detection advised unless 2 In the absence of other detection systems

equired by the customer capable of controlling the hazard, metal
detection is required
metal detection is not required 3

Outcome of Risk Assessment / Decisions

End of line metal detection advised. Customer and BRC standard requires it to be put
in place with full controls and validation

End of line metal detection is not required

 RISK ASSESSMENT Company:
Contamination of Packaging Containers Date of Assesment:

Risk Assessment Matrix Probability Criteria

Probability 3 Contamination likely to happen, often, frequentg
1 2 3
Severity 1 1 2 3
2 2 4 6 2 Contamination can happen, but not frequent
3 3 6 9
After rating each point the multiplication of the
severity and potential rating determines 1 Contamination is unlikely to happen, rare,
Notes wheather a point is high, medium or low in remote
regard to significance.

Point / Activity / Program Description of Point

Materials Source and starter materials used by preform manufacturer

Suppliers Supplier of preforms.

 GTG PLUS LTD Assessment Conducted By: B.Tamliani
8/1/2018 T.Kobalia

Risk Assessment Model

eria Severity Criteria Outcome Decision Critieria
happen, often, frequentg 3 Contamination is likely to lead to an immediate / High Specific and immediate actions required
grave health impact, recall or regulatory issue prevent or reduce contamination

pen, but not frequent
y to happen, rare,
2 Contamination is unlikely to pose an immediate / Medium Specific actions required to prevent or re
grave risk to the consumer but repeated failure contamination
over time may
1 Contamination is unlikely to pose an immediate / Low No specific actions required
grave risk to the consumer.

Risk Assessment

Risk Description Probability Severity Value Risk

Use of non approved materials leading to migration of plastic 1 2 2 Low
constituents, heavy metals and other contaminants. This is
currently controled via certificates of conformance and analysis
against legal requirements.

The hygiene and contamination standards of the preform used 2 2 4 Medium

to make the packs can determine contamination levels of
packaging materials. Suppliers have been assessed for quality
and process control procedures. All reviewed and meet the
requirements including in-line metal detection and magnets for
the removal of metal contamination, hygiene systems and
other contamination controls
 Scope: Requirement to have in place metal detection systems

e Decision Critieria Special Points of Attention

immediate actions required to 1
educe contamination

ons required to prevent or reduce 2

on

actions required 3

Outcome of Risk Assessment / Decisions

Supplier control and certificates including incoming inspection required

Supplier control and certificates including incoming inspection required

 RISK ASSESSMENT Company: GTG PLUS LTD
Pest Control Date of Assesment: 8/1/2018

Risk Assessment Model

Risk Assessment Matrix Probability Criteria Severity Criteria
Probability 3 Failure of pest control program is likely to 3 Failure of pest control program is likely to lead to
1 2 3 happen, often, frequent an immediate / grave health impact, recall or
regulatory issue
Severity 1 1 2 3
2 2 4 6 2 Failure of pest control program can happen, but 2 Failure of pest control program is unlikely to pose
3 3 6 9 not frequent an immediate / grave risk to the consumer but
repeated failure over time may
After rating each point the multiplication of the
severity and potential rating determines 1 Failure of pest control program is unlikely to 1 Failure of pest control program is unlikely to pose
Notes wheather a point is high, medium or low in happen, rare, remote an immediate / grave risk to the consumer.
regard to significance.

Risk Assessment

Point / Activity / Program Description of Point Risk Description

Pest Control Survey There is a full pest control system in place. This covers
rodents and insects. The service is provided by a contractor.
This includes an annual Field Biologists survey which covers
the entire plant and premises. Any issues are reported for
action by the company or the pest contractor.
Historical reports were reviewed in addition to pest control
inspections and controls. The system is managed on the
internal IT system including reporting, alerting and trending of
data. The review of historical records and data indicates a
system well under control with no significant issues relating to
product contamination. For this reason it was decided that
annual surveys will remain in place and the frequency will not
be changed.
 Assessment Conducted By: B.Tamliani Scope: All pest control inspections and control activities
T.Kobalia

Model
ria Outcome Decision Critieria Special Points of Attention
rogram is likely to lead to High Pest control activity required at a frequent level - 1 Refer to pest activity trends to inform frequency
alth impact, recall or Frequency as advised by pest contractor and scope

rogram is unlikely to pose
k to the consumer but
me may
rogram is unlikely to pose
k to the consumer.
Medium Pest control activity required at a reduced level - 2
Frequency as advised by pest contractor
Low Pest control activity required at a minimum level 3
- Frequency as advised by pest contractor

ment

Probability Severity Value Risk Outcome of Risk Assessment / Decisions

2 3 6 Medium No change to the frequency required. This will be kept under review following each
survey report. 6 monthly surveys