Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

FIR No:

Bureau Veritas FIELD INSPECTION REPORT JSL/KAN/OGC/92091/FIR/007


(India) Private Limited
BVIL REF: IND.A.4.20.0177 R1 BVIL Date: 30/04/2021

Project: Central 48’’ Rich and Lean Gas Segregation Pipe


Manufacturer: M/s. Jindal Saw Ltd.
Line Project
Supply Intended For: OQ Gas Network (OGC) Order No/ LOA No: OGC-21-2019-LOA-92091
Inspection Ordered By: M/s. Jindal Saw Ltd. Place with: OQ Gas Network (OGC) to Jindal Saw Ltd.
Supplier: M/s. Jindal Saw Ltd. Supply / Item: Bare LSAW Pipes
Performing Office (PO): BV – Gandhidham Contracting Office (CO): BV – Ahmedabad
Drawing No: -N.A.- Rev.: -N.A.- ITP No. : Q-OGC-2020NS Rev. : C Dated : 07/07/2020

A] Measuring Instruments Used (including satisfactory verification of suitability)


 Please refer Plant Calibration Record Report No. JSLM/ICR/J3/21/016 Dated 25.04.2021
 Please refer Lab Calibration Record Report No. JSLM/LAB/CALIBRATION LIST/2021/08 Rev.00 Provided Dated 25.04.2021
 Please refer NDT Equipment Calibration Record updated on Dated 23.04.2021

Quantity Offered: Quantity Accepted: Quantity Rejected:


As per “Today’s Qty” of Table – 1 As per “Today’s Qty” of Table – 1 Nil

TABLE – 1: LOA Status (Cumulative Qty is accepted qty from Final Visual & Dimensional Inspection)
Ordered
Ordered Previous Today’s Cumulative Balance
Qty
Qty Qty Qty Qty Qty
Sr. combined %
Item Description
No. In Meters In Meters In Meters Completed
In In
(No's of (No's of (No's of In Meters
Meters Meters
Pipe) Pipe) Pipe)
48" Pipe, 20.6 mm WT, API 5L
1 4200 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00%
Gr. X70MS / L485MS, PSL2, SAWL
26700
48" Pipe, 20.6 mm WT, API 5L
2 22500 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00%
Gr. X70MS / L485MS, PSL2, SAWL
48" Pipe, 23.8 mm WT, API 5L
*** 3 39000
Gr. X70MS / L485MS, PSL2, SAWL
48" Pipe, 23.8 mm WT, API 5L 39670 0.000 398.595 398.595 39271.405 1.00%
*** 4 300
Gr. X70MS / L485MS, PSL2, SAWL
48" Pipe, 23.8 mm WT, API 5L
*** 9 370
Gr. X70MS / L485MS, PSL2, SAWL
48" Pipe, 27.0 mm WT, API 5L
*** 5 60
Gr. X70MS / L485MS, PSL2, SAWL
338 0.000 261.120 261.120 76.880 77.25 %
48" Pipe, 27.0 mm WT, API 5L
*** 8 278
Gr. X70MS / L485MS, PSL2, SAWL
52" Pipe, 28.6 mm WT, API 5L
6 72 72 73.555 0.000 73.555 -1.555 100%
Gr. X70MS / L485MS, PSL2, SAWL
48" Pipe, 34.0 mm WT, API 5L
*** 7 36 36 49.180 11.545 60.725 NIL 100.00 %
Gr. X70MS / L485MS, PSL2, SAWL
16" Pipe, 10.0 mm WT, API 5L
10 60 60 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00%
Gr. X70MS / L485MS, PSL2, SAWL

TOTAL 66876 66876 0.000 73.555 73.555 66802.445 0.11%

*** - Total Completed % acceptable subject to test results of Mechanical test results of MPQT and RP.

Production Status - For Production status please see on Daily Production report.

B] Details of Inspection Carried out :

For Manufacturing Procedure Qualification Pipe Size: 48” OD X 34.0 MM WT.

Selected MPQT Pipe No. L321D17777, L321D17778, L321D17781.


Selected PUT calibration Plate No.425030-01.
Selected FUT calibration Pipe No. Trial-01.

 Witnessed All WELD tensile test as per ITP Sr.No.B.21- Found meeting the requirements.
 Witnessed Guided bend test as per ITP Sr.No.15.A.7- Found satisfactory.

Format FIR r5 – 19th Aug 2015 Page 1 of 4


FIR No:
Bureau Veritas FIELD INSPECTION REPORT JSL/KAN/OGC/92091/FIR/007
(India) Private Limited
BVIL REF: IND.A.4.20.0177 R1 BVIL Date: 30/04/2021

B] Details of Inspection Carried out :

For Manufacturing Procedure Qualification Pipe Size: 48” OD X 27.0 MM WT.

Selected MPQT Pipe No. L321D17788, L321D17790, L321D17792.


Selected RPQT Pipe No. L321D17811.
Selected PUT calibration Plate No.420065-01.
Selected FUT calibration Pipe No. Trial-01.

 Verified sampling activity as per sample plan.

For Manufacturing Procedure Qualification Pipe Size: 48” OD X 23.80 MM WT.

Selected MPQT Pipe No. L321D17825, L321D17827, L321D17829.


Selected PUT calibration Plate No. 422245-02.
Selected FUT calibration Pipe No. Trial-01.

 Witnessed visual inspection of inside and outside pipes as per ITP Sr.No. 10.1- No injures surface defect
observed.
 Witnessed pipe inspection for the dents as per ITP Sr.No. 10.2- No found dent.
 Witnessed radial offset of plate edges as per ITP Sr.No. 10.3- Found satisfactory.
 Witnessed misalignment of weld bead as per ITP Sr.No. 10.4- Found within acceptable limit.
 Witnessed height of weld bead (inside& outside) as per ITP Sr.No. 10.5- Found within acceptable limit.
 Witnessed pipe inspection for the hard spot as per ITP Sr.No. 10.6- No hard spot observed.
 Witnessed visual inspection for free from cracks, sweats and leaks as per ITP Sr.No. 10.7- No injures surface
defect observed.
 Witnessed visual inspection for lamination as per ITP Sr.No. 10.8- Found satisfactory.
 Witnessed weld inspection for undercuts as per ITP Sr.No. 10.9- Found satisfactory.
 Witnessed other surface imperfections as per ITP Sr.No. 10.10- Found satisfactory.
 Witnessed visual inspection for arc burns as per ITP Sr.No. 10.11- Found satisfactory.
 Witnessed wall thickness of pipe as per ITP Sr.No. 11.1- Found within acceptable limit.
 Witnessed pipe length as per ITP Sr.No. 11.2- Found within acceptable limit.
 Witnessed straightness of pipe as per ITP Sr.No. 11.3- Found within acceptable limit.
 Verified during visual inspection for no jointers as per ITP Sr.No. 11.4- Found satisfactory.
 Witnessed inside diameter at pipe ends as per ITP Sr.No. 11.5- Found within acceptable limit.
 Witnessed outside diameter at pipe body as per ITP Sr.No. 11.6- Found within acceptable limit.
 Witnessed out of roundness at pipe end for inside diameter as per ITP Sr.No. 11.7- Found within acceptable limit.
 Witnessed out of roundness at pipe body for outside diameter as per ITP Sr.No. 11.8- Found within acceptable
limit.
 Witnessed peaking and flat sports at end at pipe ends as per ITP Sr.No. 11.9- Found acceptable limit.
 Witnessed weight of pipes as per ITP Sr.No. 11.10- Found within acceptable limit.
 Witnessed bevel angle and root face as per ITP Sr.No. 12.1- Found within acceptable limit.
 Witnessed end squareness as per ITP Sr.No. 12.2- Found within acceptable limit.
 Witnessed inside and outside weld bead grinding before MPI as per ITP Sr.No. 12.3- Found within acceptable
limit.

For Regular Production Pipe Size: 48” OD X 34 MM WT, 48” OD X 27 MM WT & 48” OD X 23.80 MM WT,

 Surveillance visual & dimensional inspection of incoming plats as per ITP Sr. No. 2.1 – Found within tolerance.
 Reviewed reports for control Chemical analysis as per ITP Sr.No.2.2 - Found within acceptable limit.
 Reviewed reports for control Tensile test as per ITP Sr.No.2.3 - Found meeting the requirements.

Format FIR r5 – 19th Aug 2015 Page 2 of 4


FIR No:
Bureau Veritas FIELD INSPECTION REPORT JSL/KAN/OGC/92091/FIR/007
(India) Private Limited
BVIL REF: IND.A.4.20.0177 R1 BVIL Date: 30/04/2021

B] Details of Inspection Carried out :


 Random witnessed Calibration of Plate Ultrasonic testing as per ITP Sr.No.2.4 - Found satisfactory.
 Random witnessed Plate Ultrasonic testing as per ITP Sr.No.2.4 - No significant defect observes.
 Monitoring Edge milling as per ITP Sr.No.3.1 - Found satisfactory.
 Monitoring Crimping of plates as per ITP Sr.No.3.2 - Found satisfactory.
 Monitoring JCO forming as per ITP Sr.No. 3.3 - Found Satisfactory.
 Monitoring welding consumable of wire, Flux & Electrode as per approved WPS and as per ITP Sr.No.4.2 - Found
Satisfactory.
 Reviewed WPS & PQR for Process and Welder operator qualification as per ITP Sr.No.4.2 - Found in order.
 Reviewed welding consumable of wire, Flux & Electrode MTC as per ITP Sr.No.4.2 - Found meeting the
requirements.
 Monitoring Automatic tack welding as per ITP Sr.No. 4.3- Found satisfactory.
 Monitoring Tab welding for GMAW welding as per ITP Sr.No. 4.4- Found satisfactory.
 Monitoring Automatic submerged arc welding as per ITP Sr.No. 4.5 - Found satisfactory.
 Monitoring preliminary visual inspection as per ITP Sr.No.4.6 - No injurious surface observed.
 Monitoring straightness of pipe as per ITP Sr.No.6.0 - Found within acceptable limit.
 Random witnessed Cold expansion as per ITP Sr.No.7.0 - Found satisfactory.
 Random witnessed weekly Pressure gauge calibration as per ITP Sr.No. 8.0 - Found satisfactory.
 Random witnessed hydrostatic test as per ITP Sr.No.8.0 - Neither pressure drop nor leakage observed during
holding time of 10 seconds minimum.
 Random witnessed calibration of pipe for final automatic Ultrasonic testing as per ITP Sr.No. 9.1 - Found
satisfactory.
 Random witnessed Final Automatic Ultrasonic testing as per ITP Sr.No. 9.1 - No significant defect observes.
 Random witnessed calibration of MUT as per ITP Sr.No. 9.2 - Found satisfactory.
 Random witnessed MUT untested weld length of 250mm mini. and AUT indication by angle probe as per ITP
Sr.No. 9.2 - No significant defect observes.
 Random witnessed MUT circumference direction for longitudinal defect detection 25 mm mini. angle probe as
per ITP Sr.No. 9.2 - No significant defect observes.
 Random witnessed MUT circumference up to 110mm mini. by TR Probe as per ITP Sr.No. 9.2 - No significant
defect observes.
 Reviewed x ray film and reports as per ITP Sr.No. 9.3- Found satisfactory.
 Random witnessed magnetic particle inspection as per ITP Sr.No. 9.4 - No significant defect observes.
 Random witnessed residual magnetism as per ITP Sr.No. 9.5 - Found within acceptable limit.
 Random witnessed visual inspection of inside and outside pipes as per ITP Sr.No. 10.1- No injures surface defect
observed.
 Random witnessed pipe inspection for the dents as per ITP Sr.No. 10.2- No found dent.
 Random witnessed radial offset of plate edges as per ITP Sr.No. 10.3- Found satisfactory.
 Random witnessed misalignment of weld bead as per ITP Sr.No. 10.4- Found within acceptable limit.
 Random witnessed height of weld bead (inside& outside) as per ITP Sr.No. 10.5- Found within acceptable limit.
 Random witnessed pipe inspection for the hard spot as per ITP Sr.No. 10.6- No hard spot observed.
 Random witnessed visual inspection for free from cracks, sweats and leaks as per ITP Sr.No. 10.7- No injures
surface defect observed.
 Random witnessed visual inspection for lamination as per ITP Sr.No. 10.8- Found satisfactory.
 Random witnessed weld inspection for undercuts as per ITP Sr.No. 10.9- Found satisfactory.
 Random witnessed other surface imperfections as per ITP Sr.No. 10.10- Found satisfactory.
 Random witnessed visual inspection for arc burns as per ITP Sr.No. 10.11- Found satisfactory.
 Random witnessed wall thickness of pipe as per ITP Sr.No. 11.1- Found within acceptable limit.
 Random witnessed pipe length as per ITP Sr.No. 11.2- Found within acceptable limit.
 Random witnessed straightness of pipe as per ITP Sr.No. 11.3- Found within acceptable limit.
 Verified during visual inspection for no jointers as per ITP Sr.No. 11.4- Found satisfactory.
 Random witnessed inside diameter at pipe ends as per ITP Sr.No. 11.5- Found within acceptable limit.
 Random witnessed outside diameter at pipe body as per ITP Sr.No. 11.6- Found within acceptable limit.
 Random witnessed out of roundness at pipe end for inside diameter as per ITP Sr.No. 11.7- Found within
acceptable limit.
 Random witnessed out of roundness at pipe body for outside diameter as per ITP Sr.No. 11.8- Found within

Format FIR r5 – 19th Aug 2015 Page 3 of 4


FIR No:
Bureau Veritas FIELD INSPECTION REPORT JSL/KAN/OGC/92091/FIR/007
(India) Private Limited
BVIL REF: IND.A.4.20.0177 R1 BVIL Date: 30/04/2021

B] Details of Inspection Carried out :


acceptable limit.
 Random witnessed peaking and flat sports at end at pipe ends as per ITP Sr.No. 11.9- Found acceptable limit.
 Random witnessed weight of pipes as per ITP Sr.No. 11.10- Found within acceptable limit.
 Random witnessed bevel angle and root face as per ITP Sr.No. 12.1- Found within acceptable limit.
 Random witnessed end squareness as per ITP Sr.No. 12.2- Found within acceptable limit.
 Monitoring inside and outside weld bead grinding before MPI as per ITP Sr.No. 12.3- Found within acceptable
limit.
 Monitoring both pipes end covered with metallic bevel protector as per ITP Sr.No. 12.4- Found satisfactory.
 Random verified sampling activity as per sample plan.

Note: -
 Reviewed raw material test certificates for plates – Found meeting the requirements except below point
incorporate in RMTC. (Continuous casting method not specified)
 As per Physical plate Marking verification and RMTC provided data some points not match (Heat No. 6 digit after
4 more numbers are available and as per marking RMTC number not match with RMTC) - same as conformation
required by plate manufacturer and client concern required.
 27mm WT – RPQT Done Sampling Not Completed, testing balance for repair approval.

Identification: Nil

Remark: Photographs not attached due to USB access not permitted to JSL premises.

Attending Inspectors: Kaushikkumar Patel & Nimesh Patel (Day Shift) & Mohit Solanki (Night Shift)
Category: (1) Accepted, (2) Conditionally Accepted, (3) Re-Inspection Required, (4) Rejected, (5) Advice / Instruction from Client Required.
Inspection Date(s): ANY NON Yes
28/04/2021 to
CONFORMITY
29/04/2021
FOUND? No

Complete
Inspection Place(s): Kaushikkumar Patel
ORDER
JCO – III, Jindal Saw Date: 30.04.2021
STATUS
Ltd, Nanakapaya, Balance Supplier’s Signature & Date Mobile No. +91-9687000073
Mundra Telephone No.

Format FIR r5 – 19th Aug 2015 Page 4 of 4

You might also like