Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Inferior Patellar Pole Avulsion Fractures Osteosynthesis Compared With Pole Resection
Inferior Patellar Pole Avulsion Fractures Osteosynthesis Compared With Pole Resection
Inferior Patellar Pole Avulsion Fractures Osteosynthesis Compared With Pole Resection
INTRODUCTION
ABSTRACT
In patients who have an avulsion fracture of the patellar pole (Fig. 1),
the extensor mechanism is disrupted and should be repaired. Preser- BACKGROUND:
vation of the inferior patellar pole and osteosynthesis maintain the The ideal treatment for avulsion
patellar height and the normal anatomic and biomechanical relation- fractures of the inferior pole of
ships of the patellofemoral joint and thus can provide better clinical the patella has not yet been
results compared with those of excision of the patellar pole fragments identified. The options include
(1) internal fixation of the pole
fragment and (2) resection of
the avulsed fragment and repair
FIG. 1 of the patellar ligament to the
Preoperative radiograph showing an patella. We are not aware of any
avulsion fracture of the patellar pole. previous study in which the re-
The main fragment is displaced prox- sults of internal fixation have
imally. Comminution of the pole frag- been compared with those of
ment can be seen. pole resection. The purpose of
the present study was to com-
pare the long-term results of
internal fixation (with use of a
basket plate) with those of pole
resection.
METHODS:
We retrospectively studied two
groups of patients who had had
operative treatment of an avul-
sion fracture of the inferior pa-
tellar pole between 1990 and
continued
THE JOURNAL OF B O N E & J O I N T S U R G E R Y · S U R G I C A L TE C H N I Q U E S M ARCH 2005 · VOLUME 87-A · S UPPLEMENT 1, P AR T 1 · JBJS . ORG
ABSTRACT | continued
The patient is placed in the supine position. The knee is supported in a semiflexed posi-
RESULTS:
tion with use of a bolster. A tourniquet is used.
The average patellofemoral
score (maximum, 100 points)
was 94.1 points in Group A and
81.2 points in Group B. Signifi-
cant differences between the FIG. 3
groups were noted with regard to
The straight midline
knee pain, level of activity, and
skin incision starts
range of motion. Normal patellar approximately two
height was found in ten of fingerbreadths proxi-
eleven patients in Group A and mal to the displaced
in three of thirteen patients in proximal fragment
Group B. Patella baja was signifi- of the patella and
cantly associated with a poor runs distally to the
functional outcome. tibial tuberosity.
CONCLUSIONS:
In patients who have sustained
an avulsion fracture of the infe-
rior patellar pole, the normal
height of the patella can be
maintained by preserving the pa-
tellar pole. In contrast with pole
resection, which requires post-
operative immobilization, inter-
nal fixation with a basket plate
allows for immediate mobiliza-
tion and early weight-bearing.
The present study indicates that
internal fixation with use of a
basket plate can provide better
clinical results.
THE JOURNAL OF B O N E & J O I N T S U R G E R Y · S U R G I C A L TE C H N I Q U E S M ARCH 2005 · VOLUME 87-A · S UPPLEMENT 1, P AR T 1 · JBJS . ORG
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
The procedure is performed with
the patient under spinal block or
general anesthesia. The patient is
placed in the supine position. A
thigh tourniquet is applied. The
leg is draped in a manner that
will allow free movement of the
knee. The knee is supported in a
FIG. 4
slightly flexed position with use
of a bolster (Fig. 2).
The ruptured retinaculum on either side of the fracture, both fragments, and the patellar
A straight midline incision,
tendon are exposed.
approximately 12 cm in length, is
FIG. 5
Schematic representation of the interwoven suture placed transversely through the patellar tendon just distal to the pole fragments and the
basket plate.
THE JOURNAL OF B O N E & J O I N T S U R G E R Y · S U R G I C A L TE C H N I Q U E S M ARCH 2005 · VOLUME 87-A · S UPPLEMENT 1, P AR T 1 · JBJS . ORG
CRITICAL CONCEPTS
INDICATIONS:
• Avulsion fractures of the apex
of the patella, including com-
minuted fractures
CONTRAINDICATIONS:
• Open fractures
• Active infection at or near the
operative site
• Sleeve avulsions
• Pathologic fractures
• Severely osteopenic bone
• An unreliable, noncompliant
patient
continued
• Excessively aggressive
rehabilitation in the first
three weeks postoperatively
may lead to mechanical
failure.
continued
Fig. 11-A Intraoperative fluoroscopic image showing the position of the first two screws, which must be placed parallel to each other and
parallel to the articular surface of the patella. Fig. 11-B Intraoperative posteroanterior fluoroscopic image.
FIG. 13
AUTHOR UPDATE:
• Although severely osteopenic
bone is still regarded as a
relative contraindication, the
age of the patient is not a lim-
itation of the procedure.
FIG. 14
The stability of fixation is checked by flexing the knee into full flexion before the wound is
closed.
THE JOURNAL OF B O N E & J O I N T S U R G E R Y · S U R G I C A L TE C H N I Q U E S M ARCH 2005 · VOLUME 87-A · S UPPLEMENT 1, P AR T 1 · JBJS . ORG