Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BIM Modeling
BIM Modeling
BIM Modeling
Author(s):
Justin Bong Chunn Tat (BIM-Cost Engineer)
Li Yong Qiang (BIM Product Manager)
Contents
1 Foreword ............................................................................................................................................ 4
2 Acknowledgment ............................................................................................................................... 5
3 Disclaimer........................................................................................................................................... 6
4 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 7
5 General ............................................................................................................................................... 8
6 BIM Model Design Perspective ......................................................................................................... 9
6.1 Level of Definition (LOD) ........................................................................................................... 10
6.2 Common Data Environment (CDE) ............................................................................................ 12
6.3 The Responsibility of the BIM Model Designers/Modellers...................................................... 13
7 Estimating and Costing Perspective ................................................................................................ 14
7.1 The Responsibility of the Quantity Surveyor ............................................................................. 16
7.2 What is BIM Cost Model ............................................................................................................ 17
7.3 Modeling Principle for Costing .................................................................................................. 21
8 BIM Cost Model Perspective ........................................................................................................... 23
8.1 Preparation works before implementation............................................................................... 24
8.2 Defining the Non-Geometrical Aspects of Elements ................................................................. 25
8.3 Defining the Geometrical Aspects of Elements ......................................................................... 34
9 Usage Scenario of the 5D BIM ......................................................................................................... 46
9.1 BIM Cost application scenarios ................................................................................................. 46
9.2 BIM Cost application suggestions.............................................................................................. 50
9.3 The development of 5D BIM ..................................................................................................... 51
1 Foreword
Digital technologies are changing the way we work, play and live our life. The construction industry has
also been evolving towards the era of digitalization, as Building Information Modeling (BIM) unwraps
another realm of processes and techniques, reshaping and enhancing the current workflow and
professions involved in the life cycle of construction projects.
BIM have been introduced to enhance efficiency and aims to increase productivity throughout the
project life cycle and value chain of the construction industry. However, currently market faces a great
hurdle as the learning curve is high and information is not communicated and collaborated among the
stakeholders, resulting in the inability to realize the true capability of BIM.
The BIM Modeling Handbook for Cost Estimating (hereinafter referred to as "Cost modeling
Handbook") offers to the industry the recommended approach in BIM modeling to cater to the
requirements for the Quantity Surveyors for cost estimating for projects with a BIM Execution Plan
(BEP). It can be read with existing BIM Practices of various regions and is addressed to building
developers, owners, managers, architects, engineers of various discipline, construction contractors
and fabricators, students of architecture, civil engineering and the built environment. It reviews the
Building Information Modeling (BIM) model and explored the modeling techniques.
2 Acknowledgment
Our gratitude goes to our client and partners, who have contributed to the success of this document:
Singapore Region
Surbana Jurong Pte Ltd (SJ)
Obayashi Singapore Pte Ltd (OSPL)
Vigcon Construction
Malaysia Region
IJM
Econcos
Samsung C&T
Indonesia Region
PP Property
PP Construction
Adhi Karya
And fellow colleagues and friends who have contributed to the success of this document.
3 Disclaimer
This Cost modeling Handbook is independent of any Software Development Company, Vendor or
Distributor, and is not authorized by, endorsed by, sponsored by, affiliated with, or otherwise approved
by any bodies.
Autodesk, the Autodesk logo and Revit are registered trademarks or trademarks of Autodesk, Inc.,
and/or its subsidiaries and/or affiliates in the USA and/or other countries.
@Glodon Software Co. April 2020. Copyright in all or part of this publication rests with Glodon Software
Co. No part of this work may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means including graphic,
electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping or web distribution, without the
written permission of Glodon Software Co. or in line with the rules of existing license.
4 Introduction
The Cost modeling Handbook is a reference document that provides a set of guidelines and principles
for BIM Modeling to enable 5D cost estimating in the QS practices. This guide will also act as an
awareness and recommendation to the BIM modelers so that they can understand the requirements
required by the QS in the 5D BIM requirements, in order to provide the relevant information for their
purposes.
Basically, the model development should consider these recommendations at the beginning of
modeling or when the initial stage of establishing the BEP, and not in the midst of modeling, where
this will result in time and cost wastage. The client should take the lead and specify the 5D costing
requirements in the BIM implementation plan.
The principals outlined in this guide is in accordance to the construction standard method of
measurement and relevant local measurement rules and calculations, construction elements which
constitutes in a BIM model is required to be regulated and defined for better & efficient usage
downstream, along all BIM processes so that each stakeholder working with the model in the BIM
environment can achieve their objective efficiently.
Hence, it is important that the BIM models are modelled in accordance to those requirements, so that
BIM data can be fully utilized downstream and information can flow along the life cycle of the
construction project. If the BIM model quality is controlled and maintained, the model can be utilized
by the QS more efficiently to derive the necessary cost deliverables and analysis.
This value will generally benefit all parties, from the owner to designers, consultants, contractors,
facility managers, where all parties can enquire information from a single source on a common
platform. This will result in better decision making, effective deliveries and less dispute.
5 General
This guide is divided into four (4) main parts which will look at the modeling recommendations from
three (3) different perspective and the usage scenario involved. They are divided into:
(A) BIM model design perspective
(B) Estimating and costing perspective
(C) BIM cost model perspective
(D) Usage scenario of the 5D BIM
BIM model design perspective will describe how a model should be modelled in accordance to the
standards with preset templates outlined by various authorities in each region. And this forms the
fundamental of model design and development.
The estimating and costing perspective will elaborate on the requirements by the Quantity Survey (QS)
or estimator to generate or advise on cost related reports. And how these requirements affect the BIM
data required to be input by the modelers during modeling
Once the BIM model is modelled and in compliance to the modeling standards and the QS
requirements, it is required to be easily understood as enquire any data within the BIM by the QS. This
guide will further explain how the BIM data is usable in the context of the QS to produce the accurate
information related to cost.
By then, it will be clear for the QS and modeler the idea how BIM is to be utilized downstream for
which purposes. In order to provide for smooth sailing, this guide will also share a few proven cases of
the usage scenario by various stakeholders in the industry, on how and when to fully utilized the BIM
model for quantification and cost estimation.
It is advisable to specify Element LODs and not Model LODs, and the definition should be dependent
or considered on the following:
(a) The minimum level of detail needed by the team or the employer for each model’s purpose
shall be defined.
(b) It is wasteful for the supply chain to deliver a greater level of detail than is needed which may
also overload the IT systems and networks available. Again, this is warning against over-
modeling.
(c) The level of model definition required in a model at an information exchange shall be defined
in the Employer Information Requirements, directly connected with the intended uses of the
model.
(d) The levels of model definition shall be articulated in the BEP and understood by all the
stakeholders involved.
(e) There should exist a Model Production and Delivery Table that includes the LOD that models
need to meet at the project stages or data drops. It is recommended that the table includes
not models but ELEMENTS.
This CDE is important for information sharing among the project team. Everyone especially the QS is
required to access the files in the CDE to review the BIM Model for costing and estimating purposes.
The primary purposes of the BQ, which becomes a contract document, are to provide a co-ordinated
list of items, together with their identifying descriptions and quantities, that comprise the works to
enable contractors to prepare tenders efficiently and accurately; and when a contract has been
entered into, to: provide a basis for the valuation of work executed for the purpose of making interim
payments to the contractor; and provide a basis for the valuation of varied work.
Essentially, the BQ consist of a list of the items with detailed identifying descriptions and quantities,
which make up the component parts of a building. Irrespective of what contract strategy is used, at
some stage in the procurement process one party will need to quantify the extent of works to be
executed; whether it be the employer’s quantity surveyor, the main contractor or the subcontractors
for the purpose of obtaining a price for completing the works involved, valuing the extent of work
complete for purposes of payment, valuing variations in the content or extent of building works, or to
support applications for tax or other financial incentives. Consequently, detailed measurement for the
purpose of bill of quantities (BOQ) production is crucial for the following reasons:
(a) It provides a consistent basis for obtaining competitive bids;
(b) it provides an extensive and clear statement of the work to be executed;
(c) it provides a very strong basis for budgetary control and accurate cost reporting of the contract
(i.e. post contract cost control), including:
(i) the preparation of cash flow forecasts,
(ii) a basis for valuing variations,
(iii) a basis for the preparation of progress payments (i.e. interim payments),
(iv) it allows, when the BQ items are codified, reconciliation and any necessary transfers
and adjustments to be made to the cost plan
`
Fig: Excerpt from a sample BQ, showing the categorization of element under separate Bills, thus requiring
element to be separate by different floor instead of 1 full floor
Fig: Duties of QS in Collaboration Map – Excerpt from Singapore BIM Guide Version 2.0
Traditional QS usually utilize traditional tools and traditional way for Quantities Take off. Generally
they use some 2D measurement tools to get some basic dimensions on the 2D design drawings that
from the upstream. Then input the basic dimensions into the excel template, and get the final
Quantities according to the calculation formula.
The emerging BIM QS working methods have changed dramatically. Usually they get the 3D model
from the upstream, and then import it into professional BIM Quantity takeoff software to generate
BIM cost Model and directly generate the Quantities they want via one step. In terms of work efficiency,
it is usually an exponential increase, and it frees traditional QS from simple, repetitive and tedious
calculations, reshapes the value of QS, and truly experiences the power of BIM.
(1) Understanding the Background and Logic of Application Tools for BIM Cost Model
In general, if the overall logic of the BIM Cost software is similar to the upstream BIM design software,
then the transfer of model data will be smooth, and the simpler the modeling standards between them,
the more conducive to implementation.
Take a Cubicost serious software example, it’s a BIM Cost Software. It is used to explain the calculation
logic: 3D model, Quantity takeoff is performed by built-in local calculation rules. The modeling method
is also classified and modeled in the form of sub-components. This is very similar to the running logic
of BIM design software on the market, both run their business logic on the basis of 3D models. So
model data transfer between upstream and downstream becomes easy.
Other calculation software also supports the import of upstream BIM models. However, since it is not
a 3D model software internally. Therefore, this type of calculation model essentially does not have
upstream and downstream data transmission. Only processed on the 3D models display.
Quantity Takeoff software is very professional field. There is software that calculates the
reinforcement, such as the Cubicost series of TRB (Take off for rebar) software, which is the software
that specifically calculates the weight of the reinforcement; there is software that specifically
calculates the concrete volume and formwork, such as the Cubicost series of TAS (Takeoff for
Architecture and Structure) Software which is the software that specifically calculates concrete volume
and concrete.
Therefore, before determining the upstream BIM design model modeling standards, find out what the
downstream Quantity takeoff software business scope is and what data can be processed. Under this
premise, continue to consider the BIM design model modeling standards.
Whether it is design software or cost software, different software has its own format. Such as BIM
design software Revit, the generated file format is "* .rvt"; such as BIM Cost software Cubicost TAS,
the generated file format is "* .TAS". How to import "* .rvt" in Cubicost TAS software Format data, this
requires "* .rvt" data parsing in Cubicost TAS. The degree of data transfer has a lot to do with how to
draw in Revit. Therefore, modeling standards must consider the format of data interaction between
upstream and downstream models.
The more common formats are "* .ifc", "* .dwf" and other intermediate formats. Different formats
have different requirements for upstream software modeling. It is worth mentioning that Cubicost TAS
software can directly parse the "* .rvt" format without passing through the intermediate format. The
biggest advantage of this parsing method is good compatibility, and the upstream modeling standards
will not be particularly strict. Both the designer and QS can achieve a win-win situation.
Take an ifc & rvt as an example,the difference between IFC and RVT,
(a) At the code level, the principle of model analysis is different;
(b) Element Type Classification is different;
(c) The principle of reading Level is different;
(d) The coordinate direction of the model reading is different;
(e) The principle of reading the Finishing Element is different.
Quantity takeoff business. However, there are some Quantity takeoff software, because they are 2D
software logically, but can display a 3D models, so there is no concept of elevation. Whether to belong
to which floor is entirely determined by QS manually. So the data compatibility of this kind of Quantity
takeoff software is not good. Some Quantity takeoff software, such as Cubicost series software,
because its belong to BIM Cost model software and it’s a 3D model data logically, so when collaborate
with the upstream BIM design model, the building elements can be automatically assigned to the
corresponding floor according to the corresponding standards, which is more intelligent and accurate.
The same is true for plan positioning. Although the absence of the grid does not affect the Quantity
takeoff, its inspection and viewing of the model and the convenience of communication between
upstream and downstream personnel play an important role.
Elements standards refer to whether the classification of building component elements is consistent
between upstream and downstream software. For example, the upstream BIM design software
includes building elements such as walls, beams, slabs, and columns. Whether the downstream
calculation model can accept these elements. If the downstream Quantity takeoff model has these
elements, it means that the data between upstream and downstream can be better connected, and
only the corresponding standard components need to be agreed to perfectly correspond. Otherwise,
one-to-one correspondence by QS manual method is required.
To undertake upstream and downstream model data means that model information (geometric and
non-geometric attributes) can be transferred between upstream and downstream. For example, the
material information, concrete grade information, and geometric information contained in the
upstream BIM design model can all be transferred to the downstream software. On the contrary, the
downstream quantity takeoff model can make full use of this information to perform calculation
processing, and can continue to transmit data to upstream and downstream software.
Fig: Modeling Requirement and Core Information – Excerpt from HDB BIM Guide Version 2.0
Fig: Modeling Requirement and Core Information – Excerpt from Singapore VDC BIM Guide.
From the above requirements on modeling objects at different stages, a model fit for quantity take-
off and cost estimation is required to be described and specified. SISV have created a standard for the
requirements on the BIM model.
Fig: Screenshot from the QSBAR which shows requirements of Element description (LOI), unit of measure
(UoM) and minimum BIM requirements in accordance to each LOD stages
It is recommended to use the correct elements for model building. If the actual business is a column,
the column should be selected for building in the BIM design software; if the actual business is a beam,
it should be used for the beam building in the BIM design software. It is not recommended if the actual
business is a beam element, BIM Modeler uses wall element instead. From the actual BIM design
model, this situation is very common. Using the correct element to express design intent is essential
principle for upstream and downstream data transmission.
Fig: Same level element on view, but floor parameter set at different levels, resulted in inconsistency when QS
view and categorize element quantities by floor
Naming of elements follows the respective standard of practices, but should be conclusive and not
limited to the information / specifications (key words) which should be included as follows:
(a) Discipline – Structural, Architecture, etc.
E.g.: StructuralPCWall01, MDFWallPanel1, etc.
(b) Concrete Grade / Masonry Strength– according to national Standards
E.g.: 1C1_C20, 1ST1-C32/40, etc.
(c) Shape – Rectangular, Curve, Round, etc.
(d) Dimension – Thickness, Length x Width, Diameter, etc.
E.g.: In-situ Slab: 300mm, 300x400mm Timber Door, 300mm diameter round SS handrail,
etc.
(e) Material – In-situ concrete, Precast-Concrete, Timber, Aluminium, Fire-rating, Stainless steel,
Steel Hollow Section, Low-E Curtain Glass Panel, etc.
(f) Description: Other information / specification not describe in any of the above but might be
Column-++
*Length, Width
Col-++
*Material
12 Column Columns / Structural Columns C-++
Concrete Grade
PrecastColumn-++
Rebar Content (optional)
PCC-++
*Length, Width, Thickness
ColumnCap-++
Column Cap Columns / Structural Columns / *Material
13 DropPanel-++
(Drop Panel) Floors Concrete Grade
DP-++
Rebar Content (optional)
*Thickness ConcreteWall-++
*Material CW-++
Structural Load Bearing Walls
Concrete Grade PrecastWall-++
Rebar Content (optional) PCW-++
14 Wall BrickWall-++
*Thickness BW-++
Archi Non-Load Bearing Walls *Material PartitionWall-++
(Other Wall Types) Concrete Grade MasonryWall-++
Rebar Content (optional) DryWall-++
GlassWall-++
*Width, Depth
CouplingBeam-++
*Material
16 Coupling Beams Structural Framing CB-++
Concrete Grade
Insitu/precast-++
Rebar Content (optional)
*Width, Depth
RingBeam-++
*Material
17 Ring Beam Structural Framing RB-++
Concrete Grade
Insitu/precast-++
Rebar Content (optional)
*Width, Depth
Lintel-++
21 Lintel Structural Framing Concrete Grade
LTL-++
Rebar Content (optional)
Door-++
*Length, Width DR-++
22 Door Doors *Frame Material FireRateDoor-++
*Fireproofing TimberDoor-++
MetalDoor-++
Windows-++
*Length, Width WD-++
23 Bay Window Windows *Frame Material AluminiumWindow-++
*Fireproofing CasementWindow-++
LovreWindow-++
Stairs-++
*Thread, Riser, Railing
ST-++
24 Staircase Stairs *Nosing
PrecastStair-++
*Dimension
PCST-++
CurtainWall-++
26 Curtain Wall Curtain Panels / Curtain Systems *Type
CW-++
Coping-++
*Length, Width, Thickness
31 Coping Walls / Structural Framing CP-++
Material
Insitu/precast-++
*Thickness WallFinish-++
32 Wall Finish Wall Coverings / Walls
*Material WF-++
Skirting-++
*Thickness SK-++
33 Skirting Wall / Sweeps
*Material TimberSkirting-++
TileSkirting-++
FloorFinish-++
FF-++
*Thickness
34 Floor Finish Floor Coverings / Slab TimberFlooring-++
*Material
Carpet-++
100x50Tiling-++
*Thickness Waterproofing-++
35 Waterproofing Floor Coverings / Slab
*Material WP-++
SkimCoat-++
*Thickness SC-++
36 Ceiling Floor Coverings / Slab
*Material Plastering-++
Painting-++
FalseCeiling-++
Suspended Ceiling *Thickness MetalCeiling-++
37 Floor Coverings / Slab
(False Ceiling/Pelmets) *Material GypsumPlasterboard-++
GP-++
Fig: Defining Element Material and thickness. Separate finish layer from structure layer
Internal and External attributes of a wall element is recommended to be selected under Functions in
the Wall Type Properties, so that model users can make use of this information for quantity take-off
and costing.
Fig: Model Entity marking not given or given differently than 2D drawings
Fig: Door do not create opening in wall, it is not attached to the correct wall
(d)Sketch Editing / Edit Profile
It is not recommended to create a wall using the ‘Edit Profile’ function as this will result in a Read-Only
or External Object Wall which is locked and unable to be modified downstream, which might result in
quantification issues especially the reinforcement bars. This should apply to all elements which require
openings to be made. Setting the opening with a family will enable the Cubicost cost model to capture
the opening as an entity for calculation.
Fig: Opening modelled separately from wall using ‘Component’, ‘Void’ & ‘Cut’
Fig: Recommended to separate elements into respective family. Non-geometric information of nested families
will not be imported but their geometry will be imported as the main family entity. Non-geometric information
will follow the main family entity
Fig: Recommended to separate pile cap and pile element into separate families
Fig: Not recommended to cut column, but should be modelled with separate Element Type with different size
Fig: Not Recommended to create different sizes in one (1) element type, but should be modelled separately
according to respective sizes under separate Element Type, so that each different panel can be sorted out.
Fig: Not Recommended to create similar sizes together in 1 single edit section/boundary, but should create one
and copy to other locations.
is recommended to change the main family system is necessary not added in the curtain panels value.
However, it is recommended to model using the default curtain wall family for better consistency.
Fig: Curtain Panels should not have different Curtain Wall family other than the selected family system but can
be selected with another element type.
g: :
Curt Curt
ain ain
Pane Pane
ls ls
shoul Fig: Curtain shoul Fig: Curtain
d not Panels should d not Panels should
have not have have not have
differ different differ different
ent Curtain Wall ent Curtain Wall
g: g:
Curt family other Curt family other
Curt Curt
ain than the ain than the
ain ain
Wall selected Wall selected
Pane Pane
famil family system famil family system
ls ls
y but can be y but can be
shoul Fig: Curtain shoul Fig: Curtain
othe selected with othe selected with
d not Panels should d not Panels should
r another r another
have Fig: Recommended
not have Curtain Wall have
Modeling. not have
than element type. than element type.
differ different differ different
the the
ent Curtain Wall ent Curtain Wall
selec selec
Curt family other Curt family other
ted ted
ain than the ain than the
famil famil
Wall selected Wall selected
y y
famil family system famil family system
syste syste
y but can be y but can be
m m
othe selected with othe selected with
but but
r another r another
can can
than element type. than element type.
be be
the the
selec selec
selec selec
ted ted
ted
Copyright @ 2020 by GLODON, All Rights Reserved ted 39 | P a g e
with with
famil famil
anot anot
y y
her her
BIM Modeling Handbook for Cost Estimating (V1.0)
It is also recommended to separate the curtain wall mullion to horizontal and vertical type name, so
that the quantities between them can be differentiated and separated, if the curtain wall mullion is
created in this manner.
It is not recommended to model different parts of the floor slabs using the ‘Edit Profile’ or ‘Edit
Boundary’ tool. Or in other words, multiple floor slab element entities with one (1) ID. This will result
in one (1) single Read-Only or external object in Cubicost TAS. In actual fact, this should be measured
separately with separate ID, because their formwork and reinforcement layout and measurement
might be different.
Fig: Recommended to separate floor slab using Revit® ‘Opening’ tools instead of ‘Edit Boundary’.
Floor slabs connection are recommended to be joined with neighbouring elements by either:
(a) Join across adjoining elements; or
(b) Terminate at the sides of adjoining elements
Fig: Not recommended to create floor within a cut opening, instead recommended to use edit boundary for
floor within a floor
Fig: Not recommended to modify the slab using the ‘modify sub elements’ which will result in the ‘warning’
message. Unless otherwise, will be required to readjust the points to prevent the stated warnings.
Fig: Recommended to create slab thickening using ‘sweep’ under floor family instead of slab edge family
Fig: Recommended to model separately the odd shaped floor slabs element with different name stating the
shape to allow QS to categorize them separately
Fig: Not Recommended to create opening which does Fig: Recommended for opening to cut through
not cut elements respective elements
that, during design stage, the drawings are not necessarily and normally not drawn to detail for
coordination or production of construction drawings with details. In fact, this part of the work will be
handled by contractor’s BIM team. And by then more detail information and parameter would have
then be added to the elements which QS can utilized it directly without much input.
Quantity A Quantity B
Fig: Recommended crossing of elements. QS Software will automatically consider the deductions.
Fig: Design Options shown in Revit® will be imported and shown in the Cost Model.
Developer
Cost plan
Cost Plan
Consultant Contractor
QTY QTY
CHECK CHECK
Tender
Payment
Construction
2D Drawings
& RVT model
2D Drawings Cubicost
Contractor & RVT model QS
Modeling
QTO
BQ
2D
Drawings
Cubicost
Contractor QS
Modeling
QTO
Tender Cubicost
modeling BQ
BIM RVT
team IMPORT
Clash
detection
Progress
Construction
2D
Drawings
BIM RVT
Contractor team IMPORT
Clash
detection
RVT model
Progress
Cubicost
QS
Modeling
QTO
QTY
check
Fig4: BIM usage process of Site Contractor
2D Drawings
& RVT model
Clash
detection
QTY report
BQ
Document
As can be seen from the above Scenarios, in the current situation, the capabilities of users are uneven,
BIM applications are diverse, and the use processes and concerns of different groups are different. All
are in the process of exploration. The general concerns of each stakeholder are listed below so that
everyone has a broader understanding of BIM applications.
(a) 2D drawing and 3D Model how to synchronize in real time, such as 2D Design Drawing changes, you
need to consider how to update the 3D Design Modeling;
(b) When changing 3D design Model, it is necessary to compare model changes and Quantities changes
and be able to update models in a timely manner;
(c) The convenience of mutual cooperation between BIM Cost model and BIM Design model.
The BIM 5D model contains basic 3D model, in addition to the 4D dimension. The fifth dimension of
BIM is associated with 3D and 4D (schedule), allowing participants to visualize their activities and
related cost. BIM 5D represents the work of cost person. For the same amount of work, their
contributions can also be valued by colleagues and project team members. Due to the BIM 5D process,
cost managers are likely to become more valuable. BIM 5D is also related to the on-site project delivery
stage. Using reliable 4D program data and strong contract amounts, you can track forecasts and actual
costs in the actual process of the project, which is especially useful for monthly cost reporting and
budgeting.
5DBIM integrates quantity, schedule, and cost. It not only can count quantity, but also link 3D models
with various work of construction progress (WBS), dynamically simulate the process of construction
change, and implement schedule control. And cost monitoring in real time.
The application of digital technologies in specific use cases demonstrates the enormous opportunities
along the value chain, from early design stage to the construction stage. By applying the suitable
technologies in the suitable way, companies can not only reduce the asset’s construction time and
whole-life-cycle cost but also enhance the quality of processes and improve safety, working conditions,
and sustainability.