Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Wildlife and Biodiversity Conservation
Wildlife and Biodiversity Conservation
Wildlife and Biodiversity Conservation
ACTIVITY NO. 1
FINAL TERM
Eн = 2.71
ln(189)
= 2.71
5.242
Eн = 0.517
Total ∑=189
Community 2 (Plot 2)
10(10-1)
209(209- = 0.002 = 0.048 =− = − 0.146
Erebomyrma 1) 3.036
nevermanni 10
12(12-1)
209(209- = 0.003 = 0.057 =− = − 0.163
Pheidole sp. 1 12 1) 2.865
15(15-1)
209(209- = 0.005 = 0.072 =− = − 0.189
Pheidole sp. 1 15 1) 2.631
10(10-1)
209(209- = 0.002 = 0.048 =−
1) 3.036
= − 0.146
Pheidole sp. 2 10
5(5-1)
209(209- = 0.001 = 0.024 =− = − 0.089
Pheidole sp. 1 5 1) 3.729
5(5-1)
209(209- = 0.001 = 0.024 =− = − 0.089
Pheidole sp. 3 5 1) 3.729
1(1-1)
209(209- = 0.000 = 0.005 =− = − 0.026
Pheidole sp. 4 1 1) 5.298
10(10-1)
209(209- = 0.002 = 0.048 =− = − 0.146
Pheidole sp. 5 10 1) 3.036
1(1-1)
209(209- = 0.000 = 0.005 =− = − 0.026
P. annectans 1 1) 5.298
3(3-1)
209(209- = 0.000 = 0.014 =− = − 0.598
P. longiscapa 3 1) 4.269
2(2-1)
209(209- = 0.000 = 0.009 =− = − 0.042
P. punctatissima 2 1) 4.711
5(5-1)
209(209- = 0.001 = 0.024 =− = − 0.089
P. fiorii 5 1) 3.729
8(8-1)
Sericomyrmexsp. 209(209- = 0.001 = 0.038 =− = − 0.124
1 8 1) 3.270
10(10-1)
209(209- = 0.002 = 0.048 =− = − 0.146
Solenopsis sp. 1 10 1) 3.036
Solenopsis sp. 3 11 11(11-1)
209(209- = 0.003 = 0.053 =− = − 0.156
1) 2.937
1(1-1)
209(209- = 0.000 = 0.005 =− = − 0.026
Solenopsis sp. 4 1 1) 5.298
1(1-1)
209(209- = 0.000 = 0.005 =− = − 0.026
Solenopsis sp. 5 1 1) 5.298
2(2-1)
209(209- = 0.000 = 0.009 =− = − 0.042
Solenopsis sp. 6 2 1) 4.710
2(2-1)
209(209- = 0.000 = 0.009 =− = − 0.042
Solenopsis sp. 7 2 1) 4.710
3(3-1)
209(209- = 0.000 = 0.014 =− = − 0.598
Solenopsis sp. 8 3 1) 4.269
1(1-1)
Ectatomma 209(209- = 0.000 = 0.005 =− = − 0.026
gibbum 1 1) 5.298
5(5-1)
Gnamptogenyssp 209(209- = 0.001 = 0.024 =− = − 0.089
.2 5 1) 3.729
10(10-1)
Gnamptogenyssp 209(209- = 0.002 = 0.048 =− = − 0.146
.3 10 1) 3.036
1(1-1)
Gnamptogenyssp 209(209- = 0.000 = 0.005 =− = − 0.026
.4 1 1) 5.298
1(1-1) = 0.000
209(209- = 0.005 =− = − 0.026
Hypoponera sp. 1 1 1) 5.298
1(1-1)
209(209- = 0.000 = 0.005 =− = − 0.026
Hypoponera sp. 2 1 1) 5.298
1(1-1)
209(209- = 0.000 = 0.005 =− = − 0.026
Hypoponera sp. 3 1 1) 5.298
2(2-1)
209(209- = 0.000 = 0.009 =− = − 0.042
Hypoponera sp. 4 2 1) 4.710
3(3-1)
209(209- = 0.000 = 0.014 =− = − 0.598
1) 4.269
Paratrechina sp. 3
5(5-1)
Tapinoma 209(209- = 0.001 = 0.024 =− = − 0.089
melanocephalum 5 1) 3.729
Total ∑=209 ∑= 0.044 ∑ pi(lnpi)
S2 D = −4.595
=0.044 H³
=−4.595×(−1)
H³=4.595
Shanon’s
Equitablity
Eн =4.595
ln (209)
= 4.595
5.342
Eн = 0.860
DISCUSSIONS
This activity was done to compare the species abundance and composition in 4
selected plots in tropical forest situated in higher elevation through the application of
Shannon and Simpson formulas. Thus, based on the obtained result above the
community 1 and2 are diverse communities. Diverse because this is based on the
formula that was used, the Simpson 2 or s2 and the Shannon diversity index. In
Simpsons 2 rule, if the result is less than 1 it implies higher diversity, thus the results
community # 1 and 2 are both less than 1 (community 1 =0.073, community 2 = 0.044).
While the Shannon’s rule is, if the result is greater than 1 it also implies a higher
diversity, thus the results of community 1 and 2 are greater than 1 (community 1 = 2.71,
community 2 = 4.595). Further, the community # 3 are also diverse these was based on
the used Simpson 3 or s3 formulas. Based on the results (s3= 26.614) and the s3 rule
the greater the results the diverse the community. Lastly the community # 4 are less
diverse because the results is less than 1(0.886). Based on the s3 rule the lower the
results the lower the diversity.
CONCLUSIONS
Therefore, based on the obtained results and deriving of a certain formula in the
different plots. In the 4 communities/plots, three of it are diverse (community # 1,2, and
3) and one of it is less diverse (community #4). Thus, diverse communities indicate that
the species are suitable to this kind of environments.