Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Academic & Business Skills Course (ABSK 902)
Academic & Business Skills Course (ABSK 902)
(Summer-2015)
Satisfying the GUC’s required score on the Graduated Management Admission Exam
ABSK 902 is the second component of two 24 hour courses (of 1 credit each) which enhances the
graduate student’s critical thinking and scientific methodology skills with a business orientation. The
skills emphasized encompass analyzing information, with specific attention given specially to scientific
thinking skills — problem solving, observation, analysis, making inferences, interpretation, and
argumentation in reading, oral and written expression; in addition to designing a questionnaire and
producing a report based on a problem. Business reading and writing tools are also introduced through
training our graduate students to look at topics from various points of view leading to a more advanced
way of organizing ideas and writing about them in a structured, coherent way. The Graduate students
are also equipped with the skills needed for career presentations. The course fosters team work spirit
in problem solving while trying to teach the graduate students to become effective team leaders and
active team members during group discussions. The course duration is a one semester, one 90-minute
session per week.
III. Objectives:
I. Given a business article of 200 – 500 words, graduate students will be able to:
a. make inferences with an accuracy level of 100%.
b. distinguish among observations, facts, opinions, inferences, and assumptions with an
accuracy level of 100%.
II. Given an argument for/against a business issue, students will be able to:
a. evaluate whether it is valid, invalid, or faulty with an accuracy level of 100%.
b. analyze it with an accuracy level of 95%.
c. Criticize it with an accuracy level of 85%
d. evaluate it in an oral form with an accuracy level of 80%.
III. Given an business topic, graduate students will be able to:
a. Generate ideas using pre-writing techniques with an accuracy level of 90%.
b. Organize their ideas into a structured outline with an accuracy level of 90%.
c. distinguish between good and bad arguments with an accuracy level of 85%
1|Page
d. produce a 4-6 paragraph argumentative essay made up of an introduction, a body, and
a conclusion with an accuracy level of 85%.
e. Use correct sentence structure and appropriate vocabulary in writing
with an accuracy level of 75%.
IV. Given a business text of 500-1000 words, graduate students will be able to:
a. Recognize main ideas with an accuracy level of 100%.
b. Distinguish major from minor details with an accuracy level of 100%.
c. Recognize organizational patterns with an accuracy level of 100%.
f. Draw inferences about main ideas with an accuracy level of 100%.
j. Draw inferences about supporting details with an accuracy level of 100%.
K. Identify the meaning of difficult vocabulary from context with an accuracy level of 100%.
L. Identify details with an accuracy level of 100%.
m. Identify sentence completion through using analogies with an accuracy level of a 100%.
V. Given a business text of 200 – 300 words, graduate students will be able to:
a. Recognize the most accurate paraphrase of the text with an accuracy level of 100%.
b. Paraphrase the text with an accuracy level of 85%.
VI. Given several business texts of 300 – 500 words about a given topic, graduate students
will be able to:
a. Recognize the most accurate summary with an accuracy level of100%.
b. Summarize the text with an accuracy level of 85%.
XII. Given several business texts of 300 – 500 words about a given topic Graduate students will
be able to
a. Recognize the most accurate synthesis of the texts with an accuracy level of 100%.
b. Synthesize with an accuracy level of 80%.
V. Evaluation
VI. Reference
Browne, M. N. & Keeley, S. M. (2007). Asking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking, 8 th
edition. Pearson Education: U.S.A.
Burnett, R. E. (2001). Technical Communication, 5th edition. Thomson Heinle: USA.
Flemming L.: Reading for Thinking. 5th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2006.
Gregory, H. (2005). Public speaking for college and career with speech mate 3.0, 7th edition. McGraw
Hill, Higher Education: USA.
Mayfield, M. (2004). Thinking for Yourself (6th ed.). Boston: Thomson Heinle.
Pfeiffer, W. S. (2003). Technical Writing: A Practical Approach, 5 th edition. Pearson Education: USA.
Sayce, K.(2006). What Not to Write: AGuide to the Dos and Don’ts of Good English. Words at Work:
London.
Searing, A. (2007). How to Live a Better Life (e-book). Online Express Limited: U.K.
Tullis, G. & Trappe, T. (2000). New Insights into Business: Student’s Book. Pearson Education Limited:
U.K.
2|Page
Course Outline
3|Page
6 Saturday Model Essay on a given topic related to Outline & Group
4th Jun. business introduction (in outline &
tutorial group) introduction
7 Saturday Model Essay on a given topic related to III Writing an Assign
11th Jun. business argumentative individual
essay argumentati
ve essay
8 Saturday III Group
11th Jun. Paraphrase (in paraphrase
tutorial group
paraphrase)
9 Saturday III & VI Group
11th Jun. Summary (in summary
tutorial group
summary)
4|Page