Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Infrastructure Index Supplement - Europe
Infrastructure Index Supplement - Europe
ep
Infrastructure Index
A new direction:
Europe bounces back
The Infrastructure Index results Contents
The CMS Infrastructure Index analyses data across 40 jurisdictions against six key criteria
to create a guide to the most attractive destinations for infrastructure investment.
05 A new direction
06
89 88 87 87 86 86 85 85 83
European infrastructure opportunities
United States
09 The Netherlands leads the way
Netherlands
United Arab
which the private sector can invest in. There
Singapore
Kingdom
Germany
Australia
11
Emirates
is a lot of private capital waiting. Interview with Wim Blaasse, DIF
Norway
Canada
United
France
Wim Blaasse, DIF
12 The country review
75 71 18 Methodology
70 69 67 66 66
64 60
58 57 57 56 56 56 54 53
51 50 49 48 48 45 45
43 40
35
Countries ranked 11-40
26 25 23
Czech Republic
Saudia Arabia
Mozambique
Philippines
Indonesia
Colombia
Malaysia
Romania
Hungary
Morocco
Vietnam
Slovakia
Bulgaria
Mexico
Nigeria
Poland
Jordan
Turkey
Kenya
Russia
Oman
Qatar
China
Spain
Brazil
Chile
India
Peru
Italy
Iran
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
CEE‘s expanding economies lead to great Europe is set to receive more than €150bn Governments are focusing on infrastructure as a
promise for infrastructure investment. funding, mainly for road and railway links. way to kick start economies after recent recessions.
Top regional
influences
€150bn
The Netherlands has secured top spot in this year’s Index, despite the uncertainty of having 208
days with no government earlier in the year. A vigorous economy, a transparent and efficient
procurement process, together with a track record of delivery of its multi-billion-Euro pipeline of
road, water and social infrastructure PPPs have created an attractive, highly competitive
environment for investors.
It is a different story for the UK. Ranked fourth after The Netherlands, Canada and Germany,
Brexit and political uncertainty is having a considerable impact on the pipeline of greenfield
projects. Definitions of infrastructure are evolving, with asset types including digital infrastructure
and energy smart meters replacing traditional PFI schemes. With this comes a need to adapt and
maintain the UK’s strong regulatory reputation. Investors still consider the UK to be an attractive
market with no sign of a reduction in investor demand for operational stakes in transport, energy
and social infrastructure projects.
If a new direction is required, transparency and the creation of a more varied pipeline to
complement the politically appealing mega-projects will be key. Governments have a large part to
play. Wim Blaasse of Dutch Infrastructure Fund comments in the report on the success of the
Netherlands: “The Dutch government has a “consistent policy when it comes to PPPs, as all
projects which reach a certain criterion are simply procured as PPPs. It provides certainty, which in
turn creates a large pipeline, which means companies can build up large teams in the country”.
CEE is particularly exciting as their economies experience a significant expansion due to the
favourable environment for foreign investment and EU financing.
At 13th, the Czech Republic ranks highest of the CEE countries. Political stability, a strong economy
and government support for infrastructure present many opportunities for private investment. PPPs
are becoming increasingly common across CEE, with Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania and
Bulgaria all having successfully completed projects. Chinese capital is also reaching the region.
The Index presents a very positive outlook for Europe. With a mixture of mature and developing
infrastructure markets, there are significant opportunities for investors across the full range of
asset classes.
We would like to thank our interviewees for giving up their valuable time to share and contribute
their views on the infrastructure sector in their respective markets.
Lucy Plowright
Partner
TT +44 20 7524 6779
EE lucy.plowright@cms-cmno.com
Netherlands (Rank 1)
Given the current lack of subsidies for solar PV PPP hospital developments in the cities
projects and the good quality of its grid and solar of Konya, Kocaeli, Gaziantep, Manisa,
irradiation, Italy could soon become one of Europe’s Izmir and Istanbul Ikitelli all reached
most attractive countries for subsidy-free solar PV. financial close between 2016 and 2017.
Ease of Sustainability
Private doing Political Tax and Economic
The Index indices are based on the following six main indicators and further sub-indicators, as Score participation business stability environment innovation status
shown below:
Netherlands 89.31 17.00 7.97 21.28 4.18 9.87 29.00
—— Economic status
Germany 87.63 17.38 8.04 20.66 3.65 9.90 28.00
—— Sustainability and innovation United Kingdom 87.43 19.50 8.19 20.53 4.62 9.96 24.63
—— Tax environment Norway 84.70 13.75 8.39 21.89 4.36 9.41 26.90
—— Political stability France 82.58 17.50 7.26 20.43 3.12 9.67 24.60
—— Ease of doing business Czech Republic 70.46 10.00 6.59 18.20 3.59 9.18 22.90
—— Private participation Spain 69.09 16.75 6.69 16.83 3.76 9.39 15.67
12.5%
Innovation 2.5% Turkey 47.91 14.88 5.41 9.00 3.97 7.78 6.87
Quality and condition of infrastructure 5%
Russia 42.79 9.63 5.11 9.50 3.83 7.72 7.00
20%
CMS_LawTax_Negative_28-100.eps CMS_LawTax_Negative_28-100.eps CMS_LawTax_Negative_28-100.eps
Future of Energy
The Balance of Power
Report
This Infrastructure Index provides an effective tool to measure the overall attractiveness of each
What has 2017 Meant for
country for infrastructure investment, also allowing a more sophisticated analysis based on the the Transport Sector?
comparison of specific parameters, such as political stability and private investment in September 2017
infrastructure, among different jurisdictions. The commentary provided in this report provides a
Smart. Healthy. Agile. 1
regional context for our findings, also considering major themes in the industry, track-records and Real Estate – Future of energy: What has 2017 meant
project pipelines. Smart, Healthy, Agile the balance of power for Transport?
About inspiratia
inspiratia pushes the boundaries of analytics in the global infrastructure and
renewables sectors, producing the most accurate and insightful analysis,
uncovering new financial information and making robust sector predictions.
inspiratia provides clients with the tools to anticipate and analyse market trends in a way that
helps grow their pipeline of deals and assists with business development. Based in London and
Washington DC, inspiratia has an international team of industry experts and analysts all with
in-depth sector expertise and extensive professional networks. www.inspiratia.com
The information held in this publication is for general purposes and guidance only and does not purport to constitute legal or professional advice.
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with registration number OC310335. It is a
body corporate which uses the word “partner” to refer to a member, or an employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications. It is
authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority of England and Wales with SRA number 423370 and by the Law Society of Scotland with
registered number 47313. It is able to provide international legal services to clients utilising, where appropriate, the services of its associated international
offices. The associated international offices of CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP are separate and distinct from it. A list of members and their
professional qualifications is open to inspection at the registered office, Cannon Place, 78 Cannon Street, London EC4N 6AF. Members are either solicitors
or registered foreign lawyers. VAT registration number: 974 899 925. Further information about the firm can be found at cms.law
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP is a member of CMS Legal Services EEIG (CMS EEIG), a European Economic Interest Grouping that
coordinates an organisation of independent law firms. CMS EEIG provides no client services. Such services are solely provided by CMS EEIG’s member firms
in their respective jurisdictions. CMS EEIG and each of its member firms are separate and legally distinct entities, and no such entity has any authority to
bind any other. CMS EEIG and each member firm are liable only for their own acts or omissions and not those of each other. The brand name “CMS” and
the term “firm” are used to refer to some or all of the member firms or their offices. Further information can be found at cms.law
1710-0033509