The remains of several bones were discovered by a hiker in a remote mountain area. A forensic anthropologist analyzed the bones to determine the number of individuals, their sex, possible causes of death, and if the bones matched any missing persons. The analysis found evidence of 3 individuals, including 2 males and 1 female. Some bones showed signs of animal activity and fracture healing. The bone measurements matched details from missing persons reports, allowing possible identification of the remains.
The remains of several bones were discovered by a hiker in a remote mountain area. A forensic anthropologist analyzed the bones to determine the number of individuals, their sex, possible causes of death, and if the bones matched any missing persons. The analysis found evidence of 3 individuals, including 2 males and 1 female. Some bones showed signs of animal activity and fracture healing. The bone measurements matched details from missing persons reports, allowing possible identification of the remains.
The remains of several bones were discovered by a hiker in a remote mountain area. A forensic anthropologist analyzed the bones to determine the number of individuals, their sex, possible causes of death, and if the bones matched any missing persons. The analysis found evidence of 3 individuals, including 2 males and 1 female. Some bones showed signs of animal activity and fracture healing. The bone measurements matched details from missing persons reports, allowing possible identification of the remains.
In a remote area in the mountains, a hiker discovered several bones lying on a hillside. She called the local police, and they quickly secured the scene. Now, as a forensic anthropologist, it’s your job to analyze the find. What can you learn from these remains? Use the information below and your knowledge from the unit to answer the investigators’ questions. TABLE 1 Bone Inventory Bone Type Length Condition / Features Humerus 30.0 cm Intact, few scratches
Tibia 43.8 cm Evidence of healed fracture,
gnawed ends
Ulna 23.7 cm Gnawed/scratches on ends
Femur 1 58.4 cm Intact, few scratches, joint
edges are rough
Femur 2 52.8 cm Intact, few scratches
Pelvis Shallow, wide opening and
pubic arch
Cranium Bullet hole in frontal bone,
fractures, prominent brow ridges
Vertebrae / spine Partial, scattered, signs of
osteoarthritis on vertebrae
TABLE 2 Formulas for determining height based on
lengths of long bones Bone Type Female Equation Male Equation Humerus 3.36 * length + 57.97 cm 2.89 * length + 78.10 cm
Tibia 2.90 * length + 61.53 cm 2.42 * length + 81.93 cm
Ulna 4.27 * length + 57.76 cm 3.76 * length + 75.55 cm
Femur 2.47 * length + 54.13 cm 2.32 * length + 65.53 cm
Scatter pattern: The bones were found in three separate groups within a 50-foot radius. The bones in each distinct group were within 10-15 feet of each other. Group 1: Humerus, ulna, pelvis Group 2: Tibia, spine, femur 1 Group 3: Femur 2, cranium Questions: 1. Forensic anthropologists can use the length of long bones to determine a person’s height. Find the possible male or female height for each long bone that was found. Use the formulas in the table above to calculate height in centimeters. Record your answers in the table below.
TABLE 3 Record your answers
Long Bone Length Height if Female Height if Bone Male Humerus 30.0 cm 158.77 cm 164.80 cm
Tibia 43.8 cm 188.55 cm 187.926 cm
Ulna 23.7 cm 158.959 cm 164.662 cm
Femur 1 58.4 cm 198.378 cm 201.018 cm
Femur 2 52.8 cm 184.546 cm 188.026 cm
2. Based on your height calculations, could some of these bones have belonged to the same person? Which ones? Keep in mind that the measurements are approximate. a. The humerus and ulna bones could have come from the same person. 3. Of the eight bones found, which do you think probably belonged to a man? Which likely belonged to a woman? Which aren’t you sure about? Can you tell anything about the victims’ age? Explain your answers. (three to five sentences). a. 3 of the bones belonged to the man. The reason for this is the way they are shaped. Although for the most part all bones in the human body are the same there are some dog fences between the men and the women. 4. How many individuals (male and/or female) do you think were present? Do the scatter patterns support your theory? (one to two sentences) a. I believe in total there were three in total two males one female. There were a mixture of bones but most were male. 5. Do the bones show animal activity? How can you tell? (one to two sentences) a. They do seem to show some animal activity in the fact that two of the bones are a lot shorter than they normally are. 6. Do the bones show evidence of time, cause, or manner of death? Explain. (three to five sentences) a. Besides the decrease in length no. Their length could be from animals chewing on the bones which would’ve most likely caused them to down size. 7. The local police have provided you with some missing persons reports. Look at the information for each missing person and compare it to your findings. Could the bones belong to any of these missing persons? If so, which ones, and why? Keep in mind that 1 inch = 2.54 cm. (2-3 sentences) a. They could. The reason for this is any bone can match to a person as long as it has the right measurements and by judging by the size of them that they possibly were from the beginning we can tell that they could very well have belonged to one of the people. b.