Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Use A Flexor Carpi Ulnaris Muscle Flap in The Treatment of An Infected Nonunion of The Proximal Ulna
The Use A Flexor Carpi Ulnaris Muscle Flap in The Treatment of An Infected Nonunion of The Proximal Ulna
Multiple efforts had failed to heal an infected non- circlage wires securing the coronoid process to the
union of the proximal ulna. A flexor carpi ulnaris remaining ulna. The radial head was manually
muscle pedicle flap was used to improve blood reduced. Postoperatively, the radial head was
supply and soft-tissue coverage at the nonunion noted to be subluxed anteriorly, and this was ex-
site. The muscle flap and applicationof the princi- cised two months after injury. A bone graft from
ples of nonunion treatment promoted bone healing the radial head was packed around the fracture
and restoration of useful elbow function. site in the ulna. Four months later the ulna had
not healed. The original hardware was removed,
Infected nonunions of fractures pose mul- and a tension band fixation along with an iliac
cancellous bone graft was placed. Postoperatively,
tiple problems, more so when the fracture is the Kirschner wires migrated through the skin,
intraarticular. When such an injury occurs at necessitating their removal. Eight months after
the elbow the function of the entire upper the injury, tension band wiring was repeated and
limb,can be severely restricted. This report further bone graft was added. One month later
describes the successful resolution of an in- these K-wires had also penetrated the skin. The
pins were left in place. Then over several months
fected, intraarticular nonunion of the proxi- the injury site received 1600 hours of noninvasive
mal ulna, the treatment of which included electrical stimulation that did not alter the appear-
providing well-vascularizedsoft-tissue cover- ance of the nonunion. Eighteen months after in-
age with a flexor carpi ulnaris muscle flap. jury the elbow became acutely swollen and tender.
Staphylococcus aureus was cultured from the pin
CASE REPORT
tracts, and the patient was started on oral antibi-
otics. The hardware was removed one month
A 64-year-old woman fell down three steps, later, and the wound was allowed to close by sec-
sustaining a closed comminuted fracture of her ondary intention.
left, nondominant proximal ulna and a disloca- Upon presentation to the author's institution
tion of the adjacent radiocapitellar joint (Fig. 1). 20 months following the injury, the patient was
The ulnar fracture was fixed the same day by a wearing a hinged elbow orthosis and had a drain-
Rush rod passing through the olecranon into the ing sinus over the nonunion site. She could nei-
medullary cavity of the ulnar shaft and by two ther change the dressing nor apply the orthosis
herself, necessitating thrice weekly visits to her
doctor's office. The loss of function related to the
From the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, UCLA
fracture and the orthosis had forced her to move
School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California. out of her apartment into a convalescent home.
Reprint requests to Roy A. Meals, M.D., Division of With pain, the elbow flexed from 30" to 90", and
Orthopaedic Surgery, UCLA School of Medicine, 10833 the forearm rotated only from 45" to 80' of pro-
LeConte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90024. nation. Shoulder motion was full, and neurovas-
Received August 28, 1987. cular status to the hand was intact. The skin over
168
Number 240
March. 1989 Infected Proximal Ulna Nonunion 169
The patient's elbow remained free of pain with the coverage and local blood supply for the com-
above-noted motion and without evidence of in- monly encountered infected nonunions in
fection. Shortly after hardware removal oat cell the tibia. In planning the definitive treatment
carcinoma was diagnosed and the patient died
several months later. for this patient, it was noted that the olecra-
non fragment was probably hypovascular
DISCUSSION and the overlying skin was definitely inade-
quate to cover any hardware necessary to
Nonunions, and particularly infected non-
unions, of fractures around the elbow, are
rare. ',2,4,9~'0~12When present, however, their
effects on upper limb function can be devas-
tating. The principles of treatment for in-
fected nonunions are well e~tablished.~,'~ De-
bridement and open packing promote clear-
ance of the infection. Rigid fixation of the
fragments allows revascularization and heal-
ing. Depending on the specific case, ap-
proaching either the nonunion or the infec-
tion primarily may take precedence. In either
case rigid fixation is required to allow mobi-
lization and rehabilitation of adjacent joints.
Muscle and myocutaneous pedicle flaps as FIG. 3. Roentgenographic appearance of the
well as free flaps have been used to improve ulna eight months after staged reconstruction.
Number 240
March, 1989 Infected Proximal Ulna Nonunion 171
I OLECRANpN ! I
FIGS.4A-4D. The dorsal aspect of right elbow and proximal forearm of a cadaver dissection, clarified
with a line drawing. (A) and (B) The vascular pedicle enters the flexor carpi ulnaris 5 cm distal to the
elbow joint. (C) and (D) When the flexor carpi ulnaris flap is reflected proximally without distorting the
vascular pedicle, as much as 14 cm of muscle is available for coverage around the elbow.
provide rigid internal fixation. Thus, a limb muscles that might be expendable and
method of improving soft-tissue coverage that can provide highly vascularized cover-
and local blood supply was sought. age around the elbow are the brachioradidis
Flaps of skin, with and without underlying and the flexor carpi u l n a r i ~ .The
~ . ~ size and
fascia, and flaps of muscle have been taken location of the deficit to be covered and the
from the chest and abdominal walls to cover donor site morbidity need to be carefully
elbow defect^.^.^^'^^' These distant flaps re- considered before choosing the muscle for
quire attachment of the limb to the trunk for use. A preoperative cadaver dissection for
several weeks; following flap division the this case indicated that the flexor carpi ul-
transferred tissue is parasitic on the local tis- naris would serve well (Fig. 4). The flexor
sues rather than bringing its own enhanced carpi ulnaris is the strongest wrist flexor and
blood supply to the area. A distant, free flap ulnar deviator, and it should not be sacri-
of muscle with or without skin or bone ficed without forethought to the overall
would enhance local blood supply, providing function of the limb. In difficult coverage
that the required vascular anastarnoses re- problems around the elbow, as in muscle im-
mained patent and the flap survived. balances of the wrist and hand, the benefit of
Use of a local flap would preclude both the flexor carpi ulnaris in its new position
tethering the limb to the trunk and vascular must outweight the loss of powerful wrist
anastamoses, yet would provide additional flexion and ulnar deviation.
vascularity to the problem area. Two upper A chronic infection of bone can never be
Clinical Onhopaedcs
172 Meals M d Related Resaarch
considered cured because retained bacteria 6. Mestdagh, H., Mairesse, J. L., Dabrowski, A., Vi-
may remain quiescent for years before reac- lette, B., and Depreaux, R.: Contribution a la etude
de la vascularisation arterielle du muscle brachic-ra-
tivating symptoms. A long-term follow-up dial. Ann. Chir. Plast. Esthet. 30:64, 1985.
evaluation of the patient reported here was 7. Meyer, S., Weiland, A. J., and Willenegger, H.: The
not possible, but the treatment described treatment of infected non-union of fractures of long
bones. J. Bone Joint Surg. 57A:836, 1975.
achieved its intermediate goal of providing 8. Millard, D. R. Jr., and Ortiz, A. C.: Correction of
the patient a functional, pain-free limb and severe elbow contractures. J. Bone Joint Surg.
relieving her of drainage and orthotic use. 47A:1347, 1965.
9. Mitsunaga, M., Bryan, R., and Linscheid, R.: Con-
REFERENCES dylar nonunions of the elbow. J. Trauma 22:787,
1982.
1. Coonrad, Ralph W.: Non-union of the olecranon 10. Pinon, P., and Martini, M.: Les pseudarthroses
and the proximal ulna. In Morrey, B. F. (ed.): The post-osteomyelitiques. Une experience de 50 cas.
Elbow and Its Disorders. Philadelphia, W. B. Rev. Chir. Orthop. 67:35, 1981.
Saunders, 1985. 1 1. Sbitany, U., and Wray, R.: Use of the rectus abdo-
2. Ericksson, E., Sahlen, O., and Sandahl, U.: Late minis muscle flap to reconstruct an elbow defect.
results of conservative and surgical treatment of Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 77:988, 1986.
fracture of the olecranon. Acta Chir. Scand. 12. Sim, F. H.: Non-union and delayed union of distal
113:153, 1957. humerus fractures. In Morrey, B. F. (ed.): The
3. Fisher, J.: External oblique fasciocutaneous flap for Elbow and Its Disorders. Philadelphia, W. B.
elbow coverage. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 7 5 3 1, 1985. Saunders, 1985.
4. Home, J., and Tanzer, T.: Olecranon fractures: A 13. Weber, B. G., and Cech, 0.: Pseudarthrosis: Patho-
review of 100 cases. J. Trauma 21:469, 1981. physiology, Biomechanics, Therapy and Results.
5. Mathes, S., and Nahai, F.: Clinical Atlas of Muscle Philadelphia, Grune & Stratton, 1976.
and Myocutaneous Flaps. St. Louis, C. V. Mosby, 14. White, W. L.: Cross chest flap grafts. Am. J. Surg.
1979. 99:804, 1960.