Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Industry and Community Project: Jacobs - Creating A Smart Systems Approach To Future Cities Project Outline
Industry and Community Project: Jacobs - Creating A Smart Systems Approach To Future Cities Project Outline
Project
Jacobs – Creating a smart systems approach
to future cities
Project Outline
Contacts
Project supervisor Dr Helena Robinson
Office location Room 479, Merewether Building H04
Email Address Helena.robinson@sydney.edu.au
Phone +61 2 8627 0012
Consultation Hours By appointment, please email
Class location Online – Zoom (access via Canvas)
Merewether Learning Studio 158 (details TBC)
Project Description
The ways that our cities will connect and operate in the future is unpredictable and complex.
Cities such as Greater Sydney are growing at a rapid pace and many regions across NSW are
trying to plan for this growth by thinking about how new communities will connect and fit
together to improve liveability in the future.
A smart systems approach applied to a metropolitan area or aerotropolis would consider how
technologies such as Internet of Things, Artificial Intelligence, and autonomous systems need
to be well integrated with built environment (such as transport infrastructure) key investment
strategies, planning policy and legislation, among many other aspects.
Jacobs is creating and shaping cities of the future as an engineering consultancy. We are not
looking for a new technology to build. Instead, we want to uncover barriers to the
development of smart cities, as well as opportunities for Jacobs to become a more active
player in technological developments and trends, through which we can enhance the work we
do for clients.
In this project, you will investigate how a smart systems approach can be used on a city-wide
scale to improve the way we live now and many years into the future.
Background
At Jacobs we have teams working to build and support growing cities around the world
through a range of competencies, all of which are associated with urban mobility:
Linear infrastructure engineering (roads, railways, tunnels, metro, etc.)
Traffic and transport analysis
Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) and other digital solutions
We also have teams working extensively in the water infrastructure sector, power and energy
sector, environmental sector, nuclear and defence industries and advanced facilities
industries.
The different discipline mixes we have in our teams enable us to offer end-to-end solutions
and potentially new ways of thinking to contribute to problem solving. For example, we can
design infrastructure and facilities from scratch, fulfil legislative requirements in
environmental approvals and community consultation, help manage the construction and
post-construction processes, and provide ongoing management, compliance and audit checks
of the site until decommission and beyond.
Currently we have teams trying to bring innovative solutions to our clients, but how can we
better anticipate problems that have not yet been identified? What do we see future cities
evolving into, and what are the tools at our disposal that can help solve problems that may
arise in the future? What are the best ways to deploy smart systems to address current and
emerging challenges to urban growth and connectivity?
Project Scope
Smart cities are the future. There are many elements which need to come together to make
them a reality. This project looks at how a multidisciplinary engineering consulting company
such as Jacobs can contribute to the journey from smart city concepts, to development of an
idea, defining a problem, building a business case, to developing the solution.
Your project may examine one part or all of this journey. The key is for you to identify how
you will position yourself or your solution as part of the smart city evolution.
Your team may choose to examine aspects such as how infrastructure in the future will be
built to connect people and places, mobility on different transport networks, the economic
and legislative policy implications of a smart precinct, the environmental and ecological
impacts of city-building on greenfield land, or the ways that communities of the future can
form new identities within a transformed space.
Project sponsor
Tim Fehon, Principal Consultant, Intelligent Transport Systems, Jacobs
Anna Craven, HR Consultant, Jacobs
Ada Zeng, Environmental Planner/Scientist, Jacobs
Rebeca Grinspum, Senior Urban Designer, Jacobs
Alok Pradhan, Senior Environmental Consultant, Jacobs
Interested stakeholders
Government agencies including local councils who are planning for cities of the future
Jacobs and other private engineering firms or architecture firms who have projects in city
planning and infrastructure building
Technology vendors such as those making IoT sensors
Consumers, road users, urban communities
Sectors/industries such as Transport (road building, technology control systems) and
Planning (density, support infrastructure)
Rubrics
Check the Assignments section of the Project Canvas Site to view rubrics for all assessment
tasks.
Policies
Policies and procedures in relation to special consideration, simple extensions, academic
dishonesty and plagiarism, use of similarity detection software, submission of assessments,
attendance, and academic appeals are set out in the Unit of Study Outline.
Readings
There is a recommended reading list on the project Canvas site. However, students in ICPU
are encouraged to develop their skills as independent learners and, as such, are expected to
design a program of reading for themselves and their group in relation to the needs of their
project.
On the specific topic of this brief, there is a list of useful online resources, reports and other
information that you can access from the Canvas home page (click on ‘Useful Resources’)
As a rough guide, students should aim to read 2-3 articles/chapters/reports (or similar) per
week. More reading may be required to meet the needs of your project. Students should
expect to complete most of the reading outside of class time.
In the early stages of the Project, students are encouraged to identify and make use of their
own disciplinary expertise in their reading choices. However, it is expected that students will
also read outside their discipline in order to give themselves a sense of the breadth of
available research on the topic and strengthen their understanding of other disciplines. Over
the course of the project students should aim to read a mixture of academic literature and
‘grey’ literature (industry reports, etc.).
Working the Group Plan pitch (not Partner attendance: feedback Group Plan (20%)
5
brief assessable) on group pitches
Semester Break
Research methods &
6
Individual Statement prep
Progressing group research PS must submit student Individual Statement
7 plans research application to the (20%)
EEE Director of Education.
Groups update the Partner; Partner attendance: feedback
8
Q&A on group progress
Finalising 9 Groups finalising data
collection; data analysis
10 Data analysis and
interpretation; ideation
Developing
11
recommendations & Group
Report prep
12 Final Group Presentations Partner attendance Group Presentations
during class time (10%)
Presenting Transferring your skills to Group Project Report
13
the workplace (50%)
Assessments*
Assessment Type Weightin LOs Assessor Due Week and Date
g
Group Plan Group 20% LO1,LO2,LO3, Project Week 5
2500 words LO5,LO6 Supervisor (01/04/2021, 11.59pm
Thursday)
Individual Statement Individua 20% LO1,LO4,LO5,LO6 Project Week 7
1500 words l , Supervisor (25/04/2021, 11.59pm
LO7,LO8,LO9 Sunday)
Group Project Report Group 50% LO1,LO2,LO3,LO4 Project Week 13
5000 words , Supervisor (06/06/2021,
Includes an individual LO5,LO6,LO8, 11.59pm Sunday)
contribution mark worth 10%** LO10,LO11,LO12
Group Presentation Group 10% LO2,LO3,LO5,LO6 Project Week 12
( 7 mins) Supervisor
** Project supervisors will specify the information that will be taken into account in assessing group
contribution.
Description
The purpose of this assessment is to help your group demonstrate a comprehensive
understanding of the brief and create an achievable plan for your group’s work across the
semester. You will articulate:
1) the problem/s your group will solve
2) your group’s overall approach to the project work
3) the tasks and roles the group members will undertake
4) the expected impact of the project
5) the timeline required for the completion of the project
The plan should have the following structure (word counts are indicative of relative
proportions only and are not mandatory).
Introduction
700 words / 25 marks
In this section, you demonstrate your comprehensive understanding of the different themes
and perspectives relating to the complex problem described in the project brief, and build a
rationale for your specific problem statement.
Drawing on a range of academic literature and other reliable sources, provide a
concise and compelling overview of key themes related to the complex problem.
Consider the topic through the lens of various disciplinary perspectives, contexts, and
issues (e.g., political, economic, social, technological, environmental, legal, etc.).
Identify gaps in current knowledge, or opportunities that could be pursued.
Articulate a problem statement derived from your overview of the complex problem
(i.e., a clear and concise description of a significant issue(s) or causal factor(s) that
your group will address).
Group Profile
700 words / 15 marks
In this section, you specify the skills and knowledge that each group member brings to the
project, and how these contribute to an integrated project plan.
Explain how the disciplinary perspectives or ways of thinking in your group shape
your shared approach to the problem, drawing on scholarly literature as appropriate.
You may also include other relevant skills (e.g., transferrable skills) and experience.
Specify each group member’s expected contributions to the project work.
Significance
200 words / 10 marks
In this section, you envision the potential significance or contribution of your project in
relation to the problem statement.
Outline the significance of your project to the Partner and/or other stakeholders.
You may include any wider contributions of your project (e.g., scholarly, social,
commercial, environmental, etc.).
Timeline
(not included in word count) 5 marks
In this section, you develop a feasible project schedule for the duration of the project (i.e.,
across the remainder of semester).
Organise the activities that are needed to accomplish the project aims and assign them
to group members according to their knowledge and skills. You need to take into
Description
Drawing on both concepts from the project unit and your experiences in the Project, address
the following questions:
1. Giving examples from the Project, analyse the ways of thinking that you brought
from your educational background.
2. Evaluate how your ways of thinking contribute to the Project in comparison to
other ways of thinking.
3. What potential or actual problems arise from working on the Project with
collaborators whose ways of thinking are similar or different to your own? What
strategies did you use to avoid or resolve those problems?
In answering all the questions, support your arguments with concepts from the academic
literature. Please reference your sources using APA 6th referencing style:
http://libguides.library.usyd.edu.au/c.php?g=508212&p=3476096
Rubric
The rubric for this assessment is available in the ‘Assignments' section of our Canvas site.
Description
This Report is the culmination of work on your project for the Partner that is submitted for
assessment to your Project Supervisor. When preparing your Report, you should bear three
audiences in mind: your Project Partner; an academic (Project Supervisor); and an intelligent,
interested adult (like yourselves) who is not an expert in the subject of your Project.
The Report should clearly communicate the Project background, method, results, analysis,
conclusions and recommendations, and references. Grading will be based on the same criteria
described for the Report and must demonstrate a scope and depth of research equivalent to
5000 words collated through group inputs.
The information in your report should clearly address the points below and be organised into
the relevant sections (please also consult the rubric). Word counts are provided as a guide
only to highlight relative weighting of the sections. Please note, a maximum word-count
applies and submissions that exceed this word-count will be penalised.
Title Page (not included in word count)
Findings / Results
1400 words / 20 marks
Discussion
1100 words / 20 marks
In this section, you integrate, interpret and evaluate the findings in reference to your aim(s) to
develop a solution or set of recommendations based on your research.
Explain the relevance of your findings in the context of the problem statement.
Develop a solution and/or set of recommendations based on your findings.
Critically evaluate your recommendations in relation to the context of the problem.
Analyse and discuss the feasibility of your solution/recommendations and develop a
high-level implementation or execution plan (e.g., what are your suggested next steps
for the Industry Partner?).
Identify and discuss any limitations of your research and project work.
Interdisciplinary Synthesis
300 words / 10 marks
In this section (which may be incorporated as a sub-section with the Discussion), evaluate the
interdisciplinary dimensions of findings and any solutions/recommendations by your group.
Note: this can include a critical discussion of the limits to interdisciplinary collaboration,
where this is the case.
Drawing on appropriate scholarly literature on interdisciplinary research, critically
evaluate the ways in which different disciplinary methods/concepts and/or sources of
evidence are synthesised in the development of your solution/recommendations.
Identify any limitations or opportunity to further develop the interdisciplinary scope
and analysis of your research.
Conclusion
400 words / 5 marks
In this section, you contextualise the key recommendations of your Report in reference to the
problem and aim(s) of your project.
Provide a compelling summary of your solution/recommendations and actions to be
taken.
Discuss the significance of your solution/recommendations for the problem and its
context. Does the outcome improve understanding, suggest a novel or innovative
approach/product, or have potential to transform current practice?
In this project, a range of information will be taken into account in assessing individual
student contributions, including:
- Completion of homework tasks (instructions will be provided by the Project
Supervisor);
- Attendance record;
- Project Supervisor’s observations of student participation in group work during class
time;
- Peer evaluations of students’ contributions to the group work, collected via a peer
evaluation survey at the conclusion of the unit.
Rubric
The rubric for this assessment is available in the ‘Assignments' section of our Canvas site.
Description
The presentation length will be no more than 7 minutes (TBC), followed by 3-5 minutes of
question time. It is expected that all students in a group will present or answer questions.
Assessment will take the contribution of all students into account.
The goal of your presentation is to inspire the Industry Partner to act on your
recommendations. To do this, they need to be persuaded that:
There is an urgent problem or opportunity that needs to be addressed;
Your solution or recommendations are based on strong, evidence-based insights;
Your recommendations can work in the real world.
Presentation content and context should be appropriate for the audience and should clearly
articulate and contextualise the problem(s) and present compelling recommendations,
supported by research results in clear and illustrative manner. You should also discuss the
significance, feasibility and limitations of your ideas.