Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Proximity
Proximity
sit of
Wseparated from a parallel mage plane (wafer) by
Wh
wdth
a
gap
that g and
long and W are larger than the
assume wavelength A of the
imaging light
We
A
<W ?A-the
/A
region of Fresnel ditfraction Then the
thatthat
and diffraction
wms the image of the slit is a function only of the particular combination
and g whch we shall call the parameter O where
- WV21Ag)
n nattems arewell knowIn. Some are shown in
soldcurvcs).The limit g W/A Fig. 4 for O 2, 3
in Fig.
4 show the light intensity at the
to Qcoresponds
v2 The dashed
gles mask The larger the
the more faithful the image. Thus the resolution becomes better at value
shorter wavelengths. smaller
na
ans and
TwO other noteworthy features ot the dffraction
2.
patterns are the ragged
neaks and the slope near a The
=
IMAGE
MASK PLANE
FIGURE 3
Ftoximity printing idealization.
146 VLSI TECHNOLOGY
Q2
a 0(COLLIMATED)
a 0 6/W
X (m)
(a)
Q7
Q3
(m) X (m)
(b) (c)
FIGURE 4
Image of slit with Q 2.0
=
3, and Q =
7.8 =
10 um; A =
0.4 um. (After Watts, Ref. 47.)
POINT
| APPARENT
SOURCE SOURCEE
DIAMETER
(a)
MIRROR
-
EXTENDED
SOURCE SOURCE
(b)
cquals the
position where the
resist
uncwidthcontrol
is in general more difficultiin threshold dose.
NTniing Linewidth is infuenced by variations inproximity printing than in contact
poyties Linewidth has been
light intensity. gap g. and
measured as a function
of ight resist
*
The linewidth variation, intensity I and
wafer gap.
defined as the
m.ask h line on the mask, is proportional to In and printed width minus the
wdth of to
there is an optimum exposure intensity which Vg. and for each
gap
arian on linewidth. The
vanation
mask-wafer gap
minimizes
can
the effect
wafer another because of wafer and mask vary across a wafer and
to
from one
bowing and dirt particles
herweenthe wafer and wafer chuck. This last problem is solved
nly a number of points contact the
with a pin chuck
wafer. For
nrimum value, control of exposure to within 13% exposure intensity near
should provide linewidth
ralof0.5 um, even or large variations of the gap g. Linewidth control to
thin 0.25 um with a 50 um gap has been reported.4
within
Recause of the sloping edges of the diffraction pattern of the
mask object consisting of equally spaced slit, the image
parallel
lines will lose definition
the spacing between lines decreases and the edge tails begin to
the peak intensity in the image (on the lines) andIm the overlap. If Iu
is minimum intensity
LAMP
MA
M3
M2
MASK
WGURE 6
Vilorminmation sysk
ens.
WAFER
(After Wats, anon
Ref. 47.) PLA S500F proximity printer. F =
filter. M =
mirror. L =
fly's eye
4.2.3 Projection Printing
Projection pinting ofters higher resolution than prOXImity printin.
ing
performan ogethe
large separation hetween mask and wafer Four
important perform.2eh
of a printer are resoluton, level to-level alignment accuracy e parame
iepth of focus. The resolution of an Ccuracy. throug
optical imaging system of nurne.
NA =
sin a withlight of wavelength A is, according to Rayleigh's crit
ina-the separation of two barely resolved point sources.eigh's criterion
f focus I The
The Rayle
is
given by
A/(2 sin a). However, near thee limiting re
ne system. the contrast in the image is imitinoigh
uselessly small.
erfomance can be specified in a more meaningful wayWe shalleshall see how ,
ansfer function. by means o the
We consider a
general optical system (Fig. 7) with
erration is no aberae
a
departure of the imaging wavefront from the Tations
sphericaifom
Yo
Xo
X x
0BJECT PLANE Di
EXIT PUPIL
OF IMAGING IMAGE PLANE
RE 7 SYSTEM
ion
printing idealization.
(After Watts, Ref. 47.)