Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lee v. DHR
Lee v. DHR
Lee v. DHR
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
4/21/2021 5:33 AM
38-CV-2021-900141.00
CIRCUIT COURT OF
HOUSTON COUNTY, ALABAMA
CARLA H. WOODALL, CLERK
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HOUSTON COUNTY, ALABAMA
TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
________________________________________________________________________
COMPLAINT
PARTIES
1. Comes now Plaintiffs, Ross Lee, Crystal Lee, individually, and as next of
friend of CMM, Jr., a minor, who are foster parents and a foster child, respectively,
DOCUMENT 2
Garrett, aka Michelle Garrett, are employees of DHR who conduct their employment
4. The harms and obligations sued upon were incurred and occurred in
Houston County, Alabama. This Court is the proper court for the trial of this action
are of the minimum sum required for jurisdiction in the Circuit Court of the State of
Alabama.
6. Further, this Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants on the grounds
that all Defendants live and/or conduct or transact business or services in this State and
County.
the services and transactions and resulting harm incurred have occurred in this State and
County.
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
6. Plaintiffs, Ross Lee and Crystal Lee, are foster parents of CMM, Jr. and
have continuously been so since his birth and release from the hospital on or around
October 2, 2019.
7. Defendants knowingly violated the law and were plainly incompetent in the
performance of their duties by disregarding the Foster Parent Bill of Rights and Alabama
DOCUMENT 2
Administrative Code Section 660 by failing to provide adequate notice of court hearings
and individual service plans; failing to abide by conflict resolution policies; failing to
abide by mediation policies; failing to adequately communicate with the Plaintiffs, failing
unlawful means; with the result of significant emotional, physical, and psychological
injury.
violating the law and were plainly incompetent in the performance of their duties by
disregarding the Foster Parent Bill of Rights and Alabama Administrative Code Section
660 by failing to provide adequate notice of court hearings and individual service plans;
proposed relative placements with an improper purpose, committing fraud in the course
achieve unlawful goals, and/or collectively agreeing to achieve lawful goals by unlawful
means.
3
DOCUMENT 2
the law and were plainly incompetent in the performance of their duties by disregarding
the Foster Parent Bill of Rights and Alabama Administrative Code Section 660 by failing
to provide adequate notice of court hearings and individual service plans; failing to abide
relative placements with an improper purpose, committing fraud in the course of their
unlawful goals, and/or collectively agreeing to achieve lawful goals by unlawful means.
violating the law and were plainly incompetent in the performance of their duties by
disregarding the Foster Parent Bill of Rights and Alabama Administrative Code Section
660 by failing to provide adequate notice of court hearings and individual service plans;
proposed relative placements with an improper purpose, committing fraud in the course
4
DOCUMENT 2
achieve unlawful goals, and/or collectively agreeing to achieve lawful goals by unlawful
means.
by violating the law and were plainly incompetent in the performance of their duties by
disregarding the Foster Parent Bill of Rights and Alabama Administrative Code Section
660 by failing to provide adequate notice of court hearings and individual service plans;
proposed relative placements with an improper purpose, committing fraud in the course
achieve unlawful goals, and/or collectively agreeing to achieve lawful goals by unlawful
means.
MALICIOUS PROSECUTION
12. Defendants are liable for malicious prosecution by violating the law and
were plainly incompetent in the performance of their duties by disregarding the Foster
Parent Bill of Rights and Alabama Administrative Code Section 660 by failing to provide
adequate notice of court hearings and individual service plans; failing to abide by conflict
5
DOCUMENT 2
placements with an improper purpose, committing fraud in the course of their duties;
unlawful goals, and/or collectively agreeing to achieve lawful goals by unlawful means.
ABUSE OF PROCESS
13. Defendants are liable for abuse of process by violating the law and were
plainly incompetent in the performance of their duties by disregarding the Foster Parent
Bill of Rights and Alabama Administrative Code Section 660 by failing to provide
adequate notice of court hearings and individual service plans; failing to abide by conflict
placements with an improper purpose, committing fraud in the course of their duties,;
unlawful goals, and/or collectively agreeing to achieve lawful goals by unlawful means.
CIVIL CONSPIRACY
14. Defendants are liable for civil conspiracy by violating the law and were
plainly incompetent in the performance of their duties by disregarding the Foster Parent
Bill of Rights and Alabama Administrative Code Section 660 by failing to provide
adequate notice of court hearings and individual service plans; failing to abide by conflict
6
DOCUMENT 2
placements with an improper purpose, committing fraud in the course of their duties;
unlawful goals, and/or collectively agreeing to achieve lawful goals by unlawful means.
DAMAGES
15. Defendants are liable for damages in all the above stated causes of action
by violating the law and were plainly incompetent in the performance of their duties by
disregarding the Foster Parent Bill of Rights and Alabama Administrative Code Section
660 by failing to provide adequate notice of court hearings and individual service plans;
proposed relative placements with an improper purpose, committing fraud in the course
achieve unlawful goals, and/or collectively agreeing to achieve lawful goals by unlawful
means; with the result of significant emotional, physical, and psychological injury.
16. Defendants were not acting inside their scope of their discretionary duties
7
DOCUMENT 2
law and the Defendants had fair notice that their conduct was unlawful via several and
diverse communications from the Plaintiffs to the Defendants and the Defendants’
representation by legal counsel advising them to take such actions or tacitly consenting
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully pray that this Honorable Court grant the following
relief:
C. For punitive damages based upon Defendants’ fraudulent conduct and breaches of
fiduciary duty owed to Plaintiffs.
E. For such other and further relief as the Court deems appropriate.
DOCUMENT 2
JURY DEMAND