Introduction To Object-Oriented Programming Using C++: Peter Müller

Introduction to
Object-Oriented Programming
Using C++
Peter Müller
pmueller@uu-gna.mit.edu
Globewide Network Academy (GNA)

www.gnacademy.org/
September 4, 1997
Preface
The first course Object-Oriented Programming Using C++ was held in Summer 1994 and was based on a
simple ASCII tutorial. After a call for participation, several highly motivated people from all over the
world joined course coordinator Marcus Speh as consultants and had pushed the course to its success.
Besides of the many students who spend lots of their time to help doing organizational stuff.
Then, the ``bomb''. The original author of the used ASCII tutorial stands on his copyright and
denies us to reuse his work. Unfortunately, Marcus was unable to spend more time on this
project and so the main driving force was gone.
My experiences made as consultant for this first course have lead to my decision that the course
must be offered again. So, in Summer 1995 I've just announced a second round, hoping that
somehow a new tutorial could be written. Well, here is the result. I hope, that you find this
tutorial useful and clear. If not, please send me a note. The tutorial is intended to be a group work
and not a work of one person. It is essential, that you express your comments and suggestions.
The course and the tutorial could have only been realized with help of many people. I wish to
thank the people from the Globewide Network Academy (GNA), especially Joseph Wang and
Susanne Reading.
Ricardo Nassif and David Klein provide me with suggestions to improve the readability of the
tutorial.
The complete tutorial is available free of charge in PostScript in both US letter and DIN A4
paper formats. Please check out http://www.zib.de/mueller/Course/Tutorial/Postscript/ .
Berlin, Germany
Peter Müller
1 Introduction
This tutorial is a collection of lectures to be held in the on-line course Introduction to Object-Oriented
Programming Using C++ . In this course, object-orientation is introduced as a new programming concept
which should help you in developing high quality software. Object-orientation is also introduced as a
concept which makes developing of projects easier. However, this is not a course for learning the C++
programming language. If you are interested in learning the language itself, you might want to go
through other tutorials, such as C++: Annotations by Frank Brokken and Karel Kubat. In this tutorial only
those language concepts that are needed to present coding examples are introduced. And what makes
object-orientation such a hot topic? To be honest, not everything that is sold under the term of object-
orientation is really new. For example, there are programs written in procedural languages like Pascal or
C which use object-oriented concepts. But there exist a few important features which these languages
won't handle or won't handle very well, respectively.
Some people will say that object-orientation is ``modern''. When reading announcements of new
products everything seems to be `òbject-oriented''. `Òbjects'' are everywhere. In this tutorial we
will try to outline characteristics of object-orientation to allow you to judge those object-oriented
products.
The tutorial is organized as follows. Chapter 2 presents a brief overview of procedural

programming to refresh your knowledge in that area. Abstract data types are introduced in
chapter 3 as a fundamental concept of object-orientation. After that we can start to define general
terms and beginning to view the world as consisting of objects (chapter 4). Subsequent chapters
present fundamental object-oriented concepts (chapters 5 and 6). Chapters 7 through 9 introduce
C++ as an example of an object-oriented programming language which is in wide-spread use.
Finally chapter 10 demonstrates how to apply object-oriented programming to a real example.
2 A Survey of Programming Techniques
Peter Müller
This chapter is a short survey of programming techniques. We use a simple example to illustrate
the particular properties and to point out their main ideas and problems.
Roughly speaking, we can distinguish the following learning curve of someone who learns to
program:
 Unstructured programming,
 procedural programming,
 modular programming and
 object-oriented programming.
This chapter is organized as follows. Sections 2.1 to 2.3 briefly describe the first three
programming techniques. Subsequently, we present a simple example of how modular
programming can be used to implement a singly linked list module (section 2.4). Using this we
state a few problems with this kind of technique in section 2.5. Finally, section 2.6 describes the
fourth programming technique.
2.1 Unstructured Programming

Usually, people start learning programming by writing small and simple programs consisting only of
one main program. Here ``main program'' stands for a sequence of commands or statements which
modify data which is global throughout the whole program. We can illustrate this as shown in Fig. 2.1.
Figure 2.1: Unstructured programming. The main program directly operates on global data.
As you should all know, this programming techniques provide tremendous disadvantages once
the program gets sufficiently large. For example, if the same statement sequence is needed at
different locations within the program, the sequence must be copied. This has lead to the idea
to extract these sequences, name them and offering a technique to call and return from
these procedures.
2.2 Procedural Programming

With procedural programming you are able to combine returning sequences of statements into one
single place. A procedure call is used to invoke the procedure. After the sequence is processed, flow of
control proceeds right after the position where the call was made (Fig. 2.2).
Figure 2.2: Execution of procedures. After processing flow of controls proceed where the call was
made.
With introducing parameters as well as procedures of procedures ( subprocedures) programs can
now be written more structured and error free. For example, if a procedure is correct, every time
it is used it produces correct results. Consequently, in cases of errors you can narrow your search
to those places which are not proven to be correct.
Now a program can be viewed as a sequence of procedure calls . The main program is
responsible to pass data to the individual calls, the data is processed by the procedures and, once
the program has finished, the resulting data is presented. Thus, the flow of data can be illustrated
as a hierarchical graph, a tree, as shown in Fig. 2.3 for a program with no subprocedures.
Figure 2.3: Procedural programming. The main program coordinates calls to procedures and hands
over appropriate data as parameters.
To sum up: Now we have a single program which is devided into small pieces called procedures.
To enable usage of general procedures or groups of procedures also in other programs, they must
be separately available. For that reason, modular programming allows grouping of procedures
into modules.
2.3 Modular Programming
With modular programming procedures of a common functionality are grouped together into
separate modules. A program therefore no longer consists of only one single part. It is now devided into
several smaller parts which interact through procedure calls and which form the whole program
(Fig. 2.4).
Figure 2.4: Modular programming. The main program coordinates calls to procedures in separate
modules and hands over appropriate data as parameters.
Each module can have its own data. This allows each module to manage an internal state which
is modified by calls to procedures of this module. However, there is only one state per module
and each module exists at most once in the whole program.
2.4 An Example with Data Structures

Programs use data structures to store data. Several data structures exist, for example lists, trees,
arrays, sets, bags or queues to name a few. Each of these data structures can be characterized by
their structure and their access methods.
2.4.1 Handling Single Lists

You all know singly linked lists which use a very simple structure, consisting of elements which are
strung together, as shown in Fig. 2.5).
Figure 2.5: Structure of a singly linked list.
Singly linked lists just provides access methods to append a new element to their end and
to delete the element at the front. Complex data structures might use already existing ones. For
example a queue can be structured like a singly linked list. However, queues provide access
methods to put a data element at the end and to get the first data element (first-in first-out (FIFO)
behaviour).
We will now present an example which we use to present some design concepts. Since this
example is just used to illustrate these concepts and problems it is neither complete nor optimal.
Refer to chapter 10 for a complete object-oriented discussion about the design of data structures.
Suppose you want to program a list in a modular programming language such as C or Modula-2.
As you believe that lists are a common data structure, you decide to implement it in a
separate module. Typically, this requires you to write two files: the interface definition and
the implementation file. Within this chapter we will use a very simple pseudo code which you
should understand immediately. Let's assume, that comments are enclosed in ``/* ... */''. Our
interface definition might then look similar to that below:
/*
* Interface definition for a module which implements
* a singly linked list for storing data of any type.
*/
MODULE Singly-Linked-List-1
BOOL list_initialize();
BOOL list_append(ANY data);
BOOL list_delete();
list_end();
ANY list_getFirst();
ANY list_getNext();
BOOL list_isEmpty();
END Singly-Linked-List-1
Interface definitions just describe what is available and not how it is made available.
You hide the information of the implementation in the implementation file. This is a fundamental
principle in software engineering, so let's repeat it: You hide information of the actual
implementation (information hiding). This enables you to change the implementation, for
example to use a faster but more memory consuming algorithm for storing elements without the
need to change other modules of your program: The calls to provided procedures remain the
same.
The idea of this interface is as follows: Before using the list one has to call list_initialize() to
initialize variables local to the module. The following two procedures implement the mentioned
access methods append and delete. The append procedure needs a more detailed discussion.
Function list_append() takes one argument data of arbitrary type. This is necessary since you
wish to use your list in several different environments, hence, the type of the data elements to be
stored in the list is not known beforehand. Consequently, you have to use a special
type ANY which allows to assign data of any type to it . The third procedure list_end() needs to
be called when the program terminates to enable the module to clean up its internally used
variables. For example you might want to release allocated memory.
With the next two procedures list_getFirst() and list_getNext() a simple mechanism to traverse
through the list is offered. Traversing can be done using the following loop:
ANY data;
data <- list_getFirst();

WHILE data IS VALID DO
doSomething(data);
data <- list_getNext();
END
Now you have a list module which allows you to use a list with any type of data elements. But
what, if you need more than one list in one of your programs?
2.4.2 Handling Multiple Lists

You decide to redesign your list module to be able to manage more than one list. You therefore create
a new interface description which now includes a definition for a list handle. This handle is used in every
provided procedure to uniquely identify the list in question. Your interface definition file of your new list
module looks like this:
/*
* A list module for more than one list.
*/
MODULE Singly-Linked-List-2
DECLARE TYPE list_handle_t;
list_handle_t list_create();
list_destroy(list_handle_t this);
BOOL list_append(list_handle_t this, ANY data);
ANY list_getFirst(list_handle_t this);
ANY list_getNext(list_handle_t this);
BOOL list_isEmpty(list_handle_t this);
END Singly-Linked-List-2;
You use DECLARE TYPE to introduce a new type list_handle_t which represents your list
handle. We do not specify, how this handle is actually represented or even implemented. You
also hide the implementation details of this type in your implementation file. Note the difference
to the previous version where you just hide functions or procedures, respectively. Now you also
hide information for an user defined data type called list_handle_t.
You use list_create() to obtain a handle to a new thus empty list. Every other procedure now
contains the special parameter this which just identifies the list in question. All procedures now
operate on this handle rather than a module global list.
Now you might say, that you can create list objects. Each such object can be uniquely identified
by its handle and only those methods are applicable which are defined to operate on this handle.
2.5 Modular Programming Problems

The previous section shows, that you already program with some object-oriented concepts in mind.
However, the example implies some problems which we will outline now.
2.5.1 Explicit Creation and Destruction

In the example every time you want to use a list, you explicitly have to declare a handle and
perform a call to list_create() to obtain a valid one. After the use of the list you must explicitly
call list_destroy() with the handle of the list you want to be destroyed. If you want to use a list
within a procedure, say, foo() you use the following code frame:
PROCEDURE foo() BEGIN

list_handle_t myList;
myList <- list_create();
/* Do something with myList */

...
list_destroy(myList);
END
Let's compare the list with other data types, for example an integer. Integers are declared within a
particular scope (for example within a procedure). Once you've defined them, you can use them.
Once you leave the scope (for example the procedure where the integer was defined) the integer
is lost. It is automatically created and destroyed. Some compilers even initialize newly created
integers to a specific value, typically 0 (zero).
Where is the difference to list `òbjects''? The lifetime of a list is also defined by its scope, hence,
it must be created once the scope is entered and destroyed once it is left. On creation time a list
should be initialized to be empty. Therefore we would like to be able to define a list similar to
the definition of an integer. A code frame for this would look like this:
list_handle_t myList; /* List is created and initialized */
/* Do something with the myList */

...
END /* myList is destroyed */
The advantage is, that now the compiler takes care of calling initialization and termination
procedures as appropriate. For example, this ensures that the list is correctly deleted, returning
resources to the program.
2.5.2 Decoupled Data and Operations

Decoupling of data and operations leads usually to a structure based on the operations rather than
the data: Modules group common operations (such as those list_...() operations) together. You
then use these operations by providing explicitly the data to them on which they should operate.
The resulting module structure is therefore oriented on the operations rather than the actual data.
One could say that the defined operations specify the data to be used.
In object-orientation, structure is organized by the data. You choose the data representations
which best fit your requirements. Consequently, your programs get structured by the data rather
than operations. Thus, it is exactly the other way around: Data specifies valid operations. Now
modules group data representations together.
2.5.3 Missing Type Safety

In our list example we have to use the special type ANY to allow the list to carry any data we like. This
implies, that the compiler cannot guarantee for type safety. Consider the following example which the
compiler cannot check for correctness:
SomeDataType data1;
SomeOtherType data2;
list_handle_t myList;
myList <- list_create();

list_append(myList, data1);
list_append(myList, data2); /* Oops */
...
list_destroy(myList);
END
It is in your responsibility to ensure that your list is used consistently. A possible solution is to
additionally add information about the type to each list element. However, this implies more
overhead and does not prevent you from knowing what you are doing.
What we would like to have is a mechanism which allows us to specify on which data type the
list should be defined. The overall function of the list is always the same, whether we store
apples, numbers, cars or even lists. Therefore it would be nice to declare a new list with
something like:
list_handle_t<Apple> list1; /* a list of apples */

list_handle_t<Car> list2; /* a list of cars */
The corresponding list routines should then automatically return the correct data types. The
compiler should be able to check for type consistency.
2.5.4 Strategies and Representation

The list example implies operations to traverse through the list. Typically a cursor is used for
that purpose which points to the current element. This implies a traversing strategy which
defines the order in which the elements of the data structure are to be visited.
For a simple data structure like the singly linked list one can think of only one traversing
strategy. Starting with the leftmost element one successively visits the right neighbours until one
reaches the last element. However, more complex data structures such as trees can be traversed
using different strategies. Even worse, sometimes traversing strategies depend on the particular
context in which a data structure is used. Consequently, it makes sense to separate the actual
representation or shape of the data structure from its traversing strategy. We will investigate this
in more detail in chapter 10.
What we have shown with the traversing strategy applies to other strategies as well. For example
insertion might be done such that an order over the elements is achieved or not.
2.6 Object-Oriented Programming

Object-oriented programming solves some of the problems just mentioned. In contrast to the other
techniques, we now have a web of interacting objects, each house-keeping its own state (Fig. 2.6).
Figure 2.6: Object-oriented programming. Objects of the program interact by sending messages to
each other.
Consider the multiple lists example again. The problem here with modular programming is, that
you must explicitly create and destroy your list handles. Then you use the procedures of the
module to modify each of your handles.
In contrast to that, in object-oriented programming we would have as many list objects as

needed. Instead of calling a procedure which we must provide with the correct list handle, we
would directly send a message to the list object in question. Roughly speaking, each object
implements its own module allowing for example many lists to coexist.
Each object is responsible to initialize and destroy itself correctly. Consequently, there is no
longer the need to explicitly call a creation or termination procedure.
You might ask: So what? Isn't this just a more fancier modular programming technique? You
were right, if this would be all about object-orientation. Fortunately, it is not. Beginning with the
next chapters additional features of object-orientation are introduced which makes object-
oriented programming to a new programming technique.
2.7 Exercises
1.
The list examples include the special type ANY to allow a list to carry data of any type. Suppose
you want to write a module for a specialized list of integers which provides type checking. All
you have is the interface definition of module Singly-Linked-List-2.
(a)
How does the interface definition for a module Integer-List look like?
(b)
Discuss the problems which are introduced with using type ANY for list elements in
module Singly-Linked-List-2.
(c)
What are possible solutions to these problems?
2.
What are the main conceptual differences between object-oriented programming and the other
programming techniques?
3.
If you are familiar with a modular programming language try to implement module Singly-
Linked-List-2. Subsequently, implement a list of integers and a list of integer lists with help of
this module.
3 Abstract Data Types
Peter Müller
Some authors describe object-oriented programming as programming abstract data types and
their relationships. Within this section we introduce abstract data types as a basic concept for
object-orientation and we explore concepts used in the list example of the last section in more
detail.
3.1 Handling Problems

The first thing with which one is confronted when writing programs is the problem. Typically
you are confronted with ``real-life'' problems and you want to make life easier by providing a
program for the problem. However, real-life problems are nebulous and the first thing you have
to do is to try to understand the problem to separate necessary from unnecessary details: You try
to obtain your own abstract view, or model, of the problem. This process of modeling is
called abstraction and is illustrated in Figure 3.1.
Figure 3.1: Create a model from a problem with abstraction.

The model defines an abstract view to the problem. This implies that the model focusses only on
problem related stuff and that you try to define properties of the problem. These properties
include
 the data which are affected and

 the operations which are identified
by the problem.
As an example consider the administration of employees in an institution. The head of the

administration comes to you and ask you to create a program which allows to administer the
employees. Well, this is not very specific. For example, what employee information is needed by
the administration? What tasks should be allowed? Employees are real persons who can be
characterized with many properties; very few are:
 name,
 size,
 date of birth,
 shape,
 social number,
 room number,
 hair colour,
 hobbies.
Certainly not all of these properties are necessary to solve the administration problem. Only
some of them are problem specific. Consequently you create a model of an employee for the
problem. This model only implies properties which are needed to fulfill the requirements of the
administration, for instance name, date of birth and social number. These properties are called
the data of the (employee) model. Now you have described real persons with help of an abstract
employee.
Of course, the pure description is not enough. There must be some operations defined with which
the administration is able to handle the abstract employees. For example, there must be an
operation which allows you to create a new employee once a new person enters the institution.
Consequently, you have to identify the operations which should be able to be performed on an
abstract employee. You also decide to allow access to the employees' data only with associated
operations. This allows you to ensure that data elements are always in a proper state. For
example you are able to check if a provided date is valid.
To sum up, abstraction is the structuring of a nebulous problem into well-defined entities by
defining their data and operations. Consequently, these entities combine data and operations.
They are not decoupled from each other.
3.2 Properties of Abstract Data Types

The example of the previous section shows, that with abstraction you create a well-defined entity
which can be properly handled. These entities define the data structure of a set of items. For
example, each administered employee has a name, date of birth and social number.
The data structure can only be accessed with defined operations. This set of operations is
called interface and is exported by the entity. An entity with the properties just described is
called an abstract data type (ADT).
Figure 3.2 shows an ADT which consists of an abstract data structure and operations. Only the
operations are viewable from the outside and define the interface.
Figure 3.2: An abstract data type (ADT).
Once a new employee is ``created'' the data structure is filled with actual values: You now have
an instance of an abstract employee. You can create as many instances of an abstract employee
as needed to describe every real employed person.
Let's try to put the characteristics of an ADT in a more formal way:

Definition (Abstract Data Type) An abstract data type (ADT) is characterized by the following
properties:
1.
It exports a type.
2.
It exports a set of operations. This set is called interface.
3.
Operations of the interface are the one and only access mechanism to the type's data structure.
4.
Axioms and preconditions define the application domain of the type.
With the first property it is possible to create more than one instance of an ADT as exemplified
with the employee example. You might also remember the list example of chapter 2. In the first
version we have implemented a list as a module and were only able to use one list at a time. The
second version introduces the ``handle'' as a reference to a ``list object''. From what we have
learned now, the handle in conjunction with the operations defined in the list module defines an
ADT List:
1.
When we use the handle we define the corresponding variable to be of type List.
2.
The interface to instances of type List is defined by the interface definition file.
3.
Since the interface definition file does not include the actual representation of the handle, it
cannot be modified directly.
4.
The application domain is defined by the semantical meaning of provided operations. Axioms
and preconditions include statements such as
 `Àn empty list is a list.''

 ``Let l=(d1, d2, d3, ..., dN) be a list. Then l.append(dM) results in l=(d1, d2, d3, ..., dN,
dM).''
 ``The first element of a list can only be deleted if the list is not empty.''
However, all of these properties are only valid due to our understanding of and our discipline in
using the list module. It is in our responsibility to use instances of List according to these rules.
Importance of Data Structure Encapsulation
The principle of hiding the used data structure and to only provide a well-defined interface is
known as encapsulation. Why is it so important to encapsulate the data structure?
To answer this question consider the following mathematical example where we want to define
an ADT for complex numbers. For the following it is enough to know that complex numbers
consists of two parts: real part and imaginary part. Both parts are represented by real numbers.
Complex numbers define several operations: addition, substraction, multiplication or division to
name a few. Axioms and preconditions are valid as defined by the mathematical definition of
complex numbers. For example, it exists a neutral element for addition.
To represent a complex number it is necessary to define the data structure to be used by its ADT.
One can think of at least two possibilities to do this:
 Both parts are stored in a two-valued array where the first value indicates the real part and the
second value the imaginary part of the complex number. If x denotes the real part and y the
imaginary part, you could think of accessing them via array subscription: x=c[0] and y=c[1].
 Both parts are stored in a two-valued record. If the element name of the real part is r and that of
the imaginary part is i, x and y can be obtained with: x=c.r and y=c.i.
Point 3 of the ADT definition says that for each access to the data structure there must be an
operation defined. The above access examples seem to contradict this requirement. Is this really
true?
Let's look again at the two possibilities for representing imaginary numbers. Let's stick to the real
part. In the first version, x equals c[0]. In the second version, x equals c.r. In both cases x equals
``something''. It is this ``something'' which differs from the actual data structure used. But in both
cases the performed operation `èqual'' has the same meaning to declare x to be equal to the real
part of the complex number c: both cases archieve the same semantics.
If you think of more complex operations the impact of decoupling data structures from
operations becomes even more clear. For example the addition of two complex numbers requires
you to perform an addition for each part. Consequently, you must access the value of each part
which is different for each version. By providing an operation `àdd'' you can encapsulate these
details from its actual use. In an application context you simply `àdd two complex numbers''
regardless of how this functionality is actually archieved.
Once you have created an ADT for complex numbers, say Complex, you can use it in the same
way like well-known data types such as integers.
Let's summarize this: The separation of data structures and operations and the constraint to only
access the data structure via a well-defined interface allows you to choose data structures
appropriate for the application environment.
3.3 Generic Abstract Data Types
ADTs are used to define a new type from which instances can be created. As shown in the list
example, sometimes these instances should operate on other data types as well. For instance, one
can think of lists of apples, cars or even lists. The semantical definition of a list is always the
same. Only the type of the data elements change according to what type the list should operate
on.
This additional information could be specified by a generic parameter which is specified at

instance creation time. Thus an instance of a generic ADT is actually an instance of a particular
variant of the ADT. A list of apples can therefore be declared as follows:
List<Apple> listOfApples;
The angle brackets now enclose the data type for which a variant of the generic ADT List should
be created. listOfApples offers the same interface as any other list, but operates on instances of
type Apple.
3.4 Notation
As ADTs provide an abstract view to describe properties of sets of entities, their use is
independent from a particular programming language. We therefore introduce a notation here
which is adopted from [3]. Each ADT description consists of two parts:
 Data: This part describes the structure of the data used in the ADT in an informal way.
 Operations: This part describes valid operations for this ADT, hence, it describes its interface.
We use the special operation constructor to describe the actions which are to be performed
once an entity of this ADT is created and destructor to describe the actions which are to be
performed once an entity is destroyed. For each operation the provided arguments as well
as preconditions and postconditions are given.
As an example the description of the ADT Integer is presented. Let k be an integer expression:
ADT Integer is
Data
A sequence of digits optionally prefixed by a plus or minus sign. We refer to this signed whole
number as N.
Operations
constructor
Creates a new integer.
add(k)
Creates a new integer which is the sum of N and k.
Consequently, the postcondition of this operation is sum = N+k. Don't confuse this with
assign statements as used in programming languages! It is rather a mathematical equation
which yields ``true'' for each value sum, N and k after add has been performed.
sub(k)
Similar to add, this operation creates a new integer of the difference of both integer values.
Therefore the postcondition for this operation is sum = N-k.
set(k)
Set N to k. The postcondition for this operation is N = k.
...
end
The description above is a specification for the ADT Integer. Please notice, that we use words
for names of operations such as `àdd''. We could use the more intuitive ``+'' sign instead, but this
may lead to some confusion: You must distinguish the operation ``+'' from the mathematical use
of ``+'' in the postcondition. The name of the operation is just syntax whereas the semantics is
described by the associated pre- and postconditions. However, it is always a good idea to
combine both to make reading of ADT specifications easier.
Real programming languages are free to choose an arbitrary implementation for an ADT. For
example, they might implement the operation add with the infix operator ``+'' leading to a more
intuitive look for addition of integers.
3.5 Abstract Data Types and Object-Orientation

ADTs allows the creation of instances with well-defined properties and behaviour. In object-
orientation ADTs are referred to as classes. Therefore a class defines properties of objects which
are the instances in an object-oriented environment.
ADTs define functionality by putting main emphasis on the involved data, their structure,
operations as well as axioms and preconditions. Consequently, object-oriented programming is
``programming with ADTs'': combining functionality of different ADTs to solve a problem.
Therefore instances (objects) of ADTs (classes) are dynamically created, destroyed and used.
3.6 Excercises
1.
ADT Integer.
(a)
Why are there no preconditions for operations add and sub?
(b)
Obviously, the ADT description of Integer is incomplete. Add methods mul, div and any other
one. Describe their impacts by specifying pre- and postconditions.
2.
Design an ADT Fraction which describes properties of fractions.
(a)
What data structures can be used? What are its elements?
(b)
What does the interface look like?
(c)
Name a few axioms and preconditions.
3.
Describe in your own words properties of abstract data types.
4.
Why is it necessary to include axioms and preconditions to the definition of an abstract data
type?
5.
Describe in your own words the relationship between
 instance and abstract data type,

 generic abstract data type and corresponding abstract data type,
 instances of a generic abstract data type.
4 Object-Oriented Concepts
Peter Müller
The previous sections already introduce some `òbject-oriented'' concepts. However, they were
applied in an procedural environment or in a verbal manner. In this section we investigate these
concepts in more detail and give them names as used in existing object-oriented programming
languages.
4.1 Implementation of Abstract Data Types
The last section introduces abstract data types (ADTs) as an abstract view to define properties of
a set of entities. Object-oriented programming languages must allow to implement these types.
Consequently, once an ADT is implemented we have a particular representation of it available.
Consider again the ADT Integer. Programming languages such as Pascal, C, Modula-2 and
others already offer an implementation for it. Sometimes it is called int or integer. Once you've
created a variable of this type you can use its provided operations. For example, you can add two
integers:
int i, j, k; /* Define three integers */
i = 1; /* Assign 1 to integer i */
j = 2; /* Assign 2 to integer j */
k = i + j; /* Assign the sum of i and j to k */
Let's play with the above code fragment and outline the relationship to the ADT Integer. The
first line defines three instances i, j and k of type Integer. Consequently, for each instance the
special operation constructor should be called. In our example, this is internally done by the
compiler. The compiler reserves memory to hold the value of an integer and ``binds'' the
corresponding name to it. If you refer to i you actually refer to this memory area which was
``constructed'' by the definition of i. Optionally, compilers might choose to initialize the
memory, for example, they might set it to 0 (zero).
The next line
i = 1;
sets the value of i to be 1. Therefore we can describe this line with help of the ADT notation as
follows:
Perform operation set with argument 1 on the Integer instance i. This is written as follows:
i.set(1).
We now have a representation at two levels. The first level is the ADT level where we express
everything that is done to an instance of this ADT by the invocation of defined operations. At
this level, pre- and postconditions are used to describe what actually happens. In the following
example, these conditions are enclosed in curly brackets.
{ Precondition: i = n where n is any Integer }

i.set(1)
{ Postcondition: i = 1 }
Don't forget that we currently talk about the ADT level! Consequently, the conditions are
mathematical conditions.
The second level is the implementation level, where an actual representation is chosen for the
operation. In C the equal sign ``='' implements the set() operation. However, in Pascal the
following representation was chosen:
i := 1;
In either case, the ADT operation set is implemented.
Let's stress these levels a little bit further and have a look at the line
k = i + j;
Obviously, ``+'' was chosen to implement the add operation. We could read the part `ì + j'' as
`àdd the value of j to the value of i'', thus at the ADT level this results in
{ Precondition: Let i = n1 and j = n2 with n1, n2 particular Integers }

i.add(j)
{ Postcondition: i = n1 and j = n2 }
The postcondition ensures that i and j do not change their values. Please recall the specification
of add. It says that a new Integer is created the value of which is the sum. Consequently, we
must provide a mechanism to access this new instance. We do this with the set operation applied
on instance k:
{ Precondition: Let k = n where n is any Integer }

k.set(i.add(j))
{ Postcondition: k = i + j }
As you can see, some programming languages choose a representation which almost equals the
mathematical formulation used in the pre- and postconditions. This makes it sometimes difficult
to not mix up both levels.
4.2 Class
A class is an actual representation of an ADT. It therefore provides implementation details for the data
structure used and operations. We play with the ADT Integer and design our own class for it:
class Integer {
attributes:
int i
methods:
setValue(int n)
Integer addValue(Integer j)
}
In the example above as well as in examples which follow we use a notation which is not
programming language specific. In this notation class {...} denotes the definition of a class.
Enclosed in the curly brackets are two sections attributes: and methods: which define the
implementation of the data structure and operations of the corresponding ADT. Again we
distinguish the two levels with different terms: At the implementation level we speak of
`àttributes'' which are elements of the data structure at the ADT level. The same applies to
``methods'' which are the implementation of the ADT operations.
In our example, the data structure consists of only one element: a signed sequence of digits. The
corresponding attribute is an ordinary integer of a programming language . We only define two
methods setValue() and addValue() representing the two operations set and add.
Definition (Class) A class is the implementation of an abstract data type (ADT). It

defines attributes and methods which implement the data structure and operations of the ADT,
respectively. Instances of classes are called objects. Consequently, classes define properties and
behaviour of sets of objects.
4.3 Object
Recall the employee example of chapter 3. We have talked of instances of abstract employees. These
instances are actual `èxamples'' of an abstract employee, hence, they contain actual values to represent
a particular employee. We call these instances objects.
Objects are uniquely identifiable by a name. Therefore you could have two distinguishable
objects with the same set of values. This is similar to ``traditional'' programming languages
where you could have, say two integers i and j both of which equal to ``2''. Please notice the use
of `ì'' and ``j'' in the last sentence to name the two integers. We refer to the set of values at a
particular time as the state of the object.
Definition (Object) An object is an instance of a class. It can be uniquely identified by

its name and it defines a state which is represented by the values of its attributes at a particular
time.
The state of the object changes according to the methods which are applied to it. We refer to
these possible sequence of state changes as the behaviour of the object:
Definition (Behaviour) The behaviour of an object is defined by the set of methods which can be
applied on it.
We now have two main concepts of object-orientation introduced, class and object. Object-
oriented programming is therefore the implementation of abstract data types or, in more simple
words, the writing of classes. At runtime instances of these classes, the objects, achieve the goal
of the program by changing their states. Consequently, you can think of your running program as
a collection of objects. The question arises of how these objects interact? We therefore introduce
the concept of a message in the next section.
4.4 Message
A running program is a pool of objects where objects are created, destroyed and interacting. This
interacting is based on messages which are sent from one object to another asking the recipient to apply
a method on itself. To give you an understanding of this communication, let's come back to the
class Integer presented in section 4.2. In our pseudo programming language we could create new
objects and invoke methods on them. For example, we could use
Integer i; /* Define a new integer object */
i.setValue(1); /* Set its value to 1 */
to express the fact, that the integer object i should set its value to 1. This is the message `Àpply
method setValue with argument 1 on yourself.'' sent to object i. We notate the sending of a
message with ``.''. This notation is also used in C++; other object-oriented languages might use
other notations, for example ``- ''.
Sending a message asking an object to apply a method is similar to a procedure call in

``traditional'' programming languages. However, in object-orientation there is a view of
autonomous objects which communicate with each other by exchanging messages. Objects react
when they receive messages by applying methods on themselves. They also may deny the
execution of a method, for example if the calling object is not allowed to execute the requested
method.
In our example, the message and the method which should be applied once the message is
received have the same name: We send ``setValue with argument 1'' to object i which applies
``setValue(1)''.
Definition (Message) A message is a request to an object to invoke one of its methods. A

message therefore contains
 the name of the method and

 the arguments of the method.
Consequently, invocation of a method is just a reaction caused by receipt of a message. This is

only possible, if the method is actually known to the object.
Definition (Method) A method is associated with a class. An object invokes a method as a

reaction to receipt of a message.
4.5 Summary
To view a program as a collection of interacting objects is a fundamental principle in object-
oriented programming. Objects in this collection react upon receipt of messages, changing their
state according to invocation of methods which might cause other messages sent to other objects.
This is illustrated in Figure 4.1.
Figure 4.1: A program consisting of four objects.

In this figure, the program consists of only four objects. These objects send messages to each
other, as indicated by the arrowed lines. Note that the third object sends itself a message.
How does this view help us developing software? To answer this question let's recall how we
have developed software for procedural programming languages. The first step was to divide the
problem into smaller manageable pieces. Typically these pieces were oriented to the procedures
which were taken place to solve the problem, rather than the involved data.
As an example consider your computer. Especially, how a character appears on the screen when
you type a key. In a procedural environment you write down the several steps necessary to bring
a character on the screen:
1.
wait, until a key is pressed.
2.
get key value
3.
write key value at current cursor position
4.
advance cursor position
You do not distinguish entities with well-defined properties and well-known behaviour. In an
object-oriented environment you would distinguish the interacting objects key and screen. Once
a key receive a message that it should change its state to be pressed, its corresponding object
sends a message to the screen object. This message requests the screen object to display the
associated key value.
4.6 Exercises
1.
Class.
(a)
What distinguishes a class from an ADT?
(b)
Design a class for the ADT Complex. What representations do you choose for the ADT
operations? Why?
2.
Interacting objects. Have a look to your tasks of your day life. Choose one which does not
involve too many steps (for example, watching TV, cooking a meal, etc.). Describe this task in
procedural and object-oriented form. Try to begin viewing the world to consist of objects.
3.
Object view. Regarding the last exercise, what problems do you encounter?
4.
Messages.
(a)
Why do we talk about ``messages'' rather than ``procedure calls''?
(b)
Name a few messages which make sense in the Internet environment. (You must therefore
identify objects.)
(c)
Why makes the term ``message'' more sense in the environment of the last exercise, than the
term ``procedure call''?
5 More Object-Oriented Concepts
Peter Müller
Whereas the previous lecture introduces the fundamental concepts of object-oriented
programming, this lecture presents more details about the object-oriented idea. This section is
mainly adopted from [2] .
5.1 Relationships
In exercise 3.6.5 you already investigate relationships between abstract data types and instances
and describe them in your own words. Let's go in more detail here.
A-Kind-Of relationship
Consider you have to write a drawing program. This program would allow drawing of
various objects such as points, circles, rectangles, triangles and many more. For each object you
provide a class definition. For example, the point class just defines a point by its coordinates:
class Point {
attributes:
int x, y
methods:
setX(int newX)
getX()
setY(int newY)
getY()
}
You continue defining classes of your drawing program with a class to describe circles. A circle
defines a center point and a radius:
class Circle {
attributes:
int x, y,
radius
methods:
setX(int newX)
getX()
setY(int newY)
getY()
setRadius(newRadius)
getRadius()
}
Comparing both class definitions we can observe the following:
 Both classes have two data elements x and y. In the class Point these elements describe the
position of the point, in the case of class Circle they describe the circle's center.
Thus, x and y have the same meaning in both classes: They describe the position of their
associated object by defining a point.
 Both classes offer the same set of methods to get and set the value of the two data
elements x and y.
 Class Circle `àdds'' a new data element radius and corresponding access methods.
Knowing the properties of class Point we can describe a circle as a point plus a radius and
methods to access it. Thus, a circle is `à-kind-of'' point. However, a circle is somewhat more
``specialized''. We illustrate this graphically as shown in Figure 5.1.
Figure 5.1: Illustration of `à-kind-of'' relationship.
In this and the following figures, classes are drawn using rectangles. Their name always starts
with an uppercase letter. The arrowed line indicates the direction of the relation, hence, it is to be
read as ``Circle is a-kind-of Point.''
Is-A relationship
The previous relationship is used at the class level to describe relationships between two similar
classes. If we create objects of two such classes we refer to their relationship as an `ìs-a''
relationship.
Since the class Circle is a kind of class Point, an instance of Circle, say acircle, is a point .
Consequently, each circle behaves like a point. For example, you can move points in x direction
by altering the value of x. Similarly, you move circles in this direction by altering their x value.
Figure 5.2 illustrates this relationship. In this and the following figures, objects are drawn using
rectangles with round corners. Their name only consists of lowercase letters.
Figure 5.2: Illustration of `ìs-a'' relationship.

Part-Of relationship
You sometimes need to be able to build objects by combining them out of others. You already
know this from procedural programming, where you have the structure or record construct to put
data of various types together.
Let's come back to our drawing program. You already have created several classes for the
available figures. Now you decide that you want to have a special figure which represents your
own logo which consists of a circle and a triangle. (Let's assume, that you already have defined a
class Triangle.) Thus, your logo consists of two parts or the circle and triangle are part-of your
logo:
class Logo {
attributes:
Circle circle
Triangle triangle
methods:
set(Point where)
}
We illustrate this in Figure 5.3.
Figure 5.3: Illustration of ``part-of'' relationship.
Has-A relationship
This relationship is just the inverse version of the part-of relationship. Therefore we can easily
add this relationship to the part-of illustration by adding arrows in the other direction
(Figure 5.4).
Figure 5.4: Illustration of ``has-a'' relationship.

5.2 Inheritance
With inheritance we are able to make use of the a-kind-of and is-a relationship. As described
there, classes which are a-kind-of another class share properties of the latter. In our point and
circle example, we can define a circle which inherits from point:
class Circle inherits from Point {

attributes:
int radius
methods:
setRadius(int newRadius)
getRadius()
}
Class Circle inherits all data elements and methods from point. There is no need to define them
twice: We just use already existing and well-known data and method definitions.
On the object level we are now able to use a circle just as we would use a point, because a circle
is-a point. For example, we can define a circle object and set its center point coordinates:
Circle acircle
acircle.setX(1) /* Inherited from Point */
acircle.setY(2)
acircle.setRadius(3) /* Added by Circle */
`Ìs-a'' also implies, that we can use a circle everywhere where a point is expected. For example,
you can write a function or method, say move(), which should move a point in x direction:
move(Point apoint, int deltax) {

apoint.setX(apoint.getX() + deltax)
}
As a circle inherits from a point, you can use this function with a circle argument to move its
center point and, hence, the whole circle:
Circle acircle
...
move(acircle, 10) /* Move circle by moving */
/* its center point */
Let's try to formalize the term `ìnheritance'':

Definition (Inheritance) Inheritance is the mechanism which allows a class A to inherit
properties of a class B. We say `À inherits from B''. Objects of class A thus have access to
attributes and methods of class B without the need to redefine them. The following definition
defines two terms with which we are able to refer to participating classes when they use
inheritance.
Definition (Superclass/Subclass) If class A inherits from class B, then B is called superclass of

A. A is called subclass of B. Objects of a subclass can be used where objects of the
corresponding superclass are expected. This is due to the fact that objects of the subclass share
the same behaviour as objects of the superclass.
In the literature you may also find other terms for ``superclass'' and ``subclass''. Superclasses are
also called parent classes. Subclasses may also be called child classes or just derived classes.
Of course, you can again inherit from a subclass, making this class the superclass of the new
subclass. This leads to a hierarchy of superclass/subclass relationships. If you draw this hierarchy
you get an inheritance graph.
A common drawing scheme is to use arrowed lines to indicate the inheritance relationship
between two classes or objects. In our examples we have used `ìnherits-from''. Consequently,
the arrowed line starts from the subclass towards the superclass as illustrated in Figure 5.5.
Figure 5.5: A simple inheritance graph.
In the literature you also find illustrations where the arrowed lines are used just the other way
around. The direction in which the arrowed line is used, depends on how the corresponding
author has decided to understand it.
Anyway, within this tutorial, the arrowed line is always directed towards the superclass.
In the following sections an unmarked arrowed line indicates `ìnherit-from''.

5.3 Multiple Inheritance
One important object-oriented mechanism is multiple inheritance. Multiple inheritance
does not mean that multiple subclasses share the same superclass. It also does not mean that a
subclass can inherit from a class which itself is a subclass of another class.
Multiple inheritance means that one subclass can have more than one superclass. This enables
the subclass to inherit properties of more than one superclass and to ``merge'' their properties.
As an example consider again our drawing program. Suppose we already have a

class String which allows convenient handling of text. For example, it might have a method
to append other text. In our program we would like to use this class to add text to the possible
drawing objects. It would be nice to also use already existing routines such as move() to move
the text around. Consequently, it makes sense to let a drawable text have a point which defines
its location within the drawing area. Therefore we derive a new class DrawableString which
inherits properties from Point and String as illustrated in Figure 5.6.
Figure 5.6: Derive a drawable string which inherits properties of Point and String.
In our pseudo language we write this by simply separating the multiple superclasses by comma:
class DrawableString inherits from Point, String {

attributes:
/* All inherited from superclasses */
methods:
/* All inherited from superclasses */
}
We can use objects of class DrawableString like both points and strings. Because
a drawablestring is-a point we can move them around
DrawableString dstring
...
move(dstring, 10)
...
Since it is a string, we can append other text to them:
dstring.append("The red brown fox ...")
Now it's time for the definition of multiple inheritance:
Definition (Multiple Inheritance) If class A inherits from more than one class, ie. A inherits
from B1, B2, ..., Bn, we speak of multiple inheritance. This may introduce naming conflicts in A
if at least two of its superclasses define properties with the same name.
The above definition introduce naming conflicts which occur if more than one superclass of a
subclass use the same name for either attributes or methods. For an example, let's assume, that
class String defines a method setX() which sets the string to a sequence of ``X'' characters . The
question arises, what should be inherited by DrawableString? The Point, String version or none
of them?
These conflicts can be solved in at least two ways:
 The order in which the superclasses are provided define which property will be accessible by the
conflict causing name. Others will be ``hidden''.
 The subclass must resolve the conflict by providing a property with the name and by defining
how to use the ones from its superclasses.
The first solution is not very convenient as it introduces implicit consequences depending on the
order in which classes inherit from each other. For the second case, subclasses must explicitly
redefine properties which are involved in a naming conflict.
A special type of naming conflict is introduced if a class D multiply inherits from

superclasses B and C which themselves are derived from one superclass A. This leads to an
inheritance graph as shown in Figure 5.7.
Figure 5.7: A name conflict introduced by a shared superclass of superclasses used with multiple
inheritance.
The question arises what properties class D actually inherits from its superclasses B and C. Some
existing programming languages solve this special inheritance graph by deriving D with
 the properties of A plus

 the properties of B and C without the properties they have inherited from A.
Consequently, D cannot introduce naming conflicts with names of class A. However,

if B and C add properties with the same name, D runs into a naming conflict.
Another possible solution is, that D inherits from both inheritance paths. In this
solution, D owns two copies of the properties of A: one is inherited by B and one by C.
Although multiple inheritance is a powerful object-oriented mechanism the problems introduced

with naming conflicts have lead several authors to ``doom'' it. As the result of multiple
inheritance can always be achieved by using (simple) inheritance some object-oriented languages
even don't allow its use. However, carefully used, under some conditions multiple inheritance
provides an efficient and elegant way of formulating things.
5.4 Abstract Classes

With inheritance we are able to force a subclass to offer the same properties like their
superclasses. Consequently, objects of a subclass behave like objects of their superclasses.
Sometimes it make sense to only describe the properties of a set of objects without knowing the
actual behaviour beforehand. In our drawing program example, each object should provide a
method to draw itself on the drawing area. However, the necessary steps to draw an objects
depends on its represented shape. For example, the drawing routine of a circle is different from
the drawing routine of a rectangle.
Let's call the drawing method print(). To force every drawable object to include such method, we
define a class DrawableObject from which every other class in our example inherits general
properties of drawable objects:
abstract class DrawableObject {

attributes:
methods:
print()
}
We introduce the new keyword abstract here. It is used to express the fact that derived classes
must ``redefine'' the properties to fulfill the desired functionality. Thus from the abstract class'
point of view, the properties are only specified but not fully defined. The full definition including
the semantics of the properties must be provided by derived classes.
Now, every class in our drawing program example inherits properties from the general drawable
object class. Therefore, class Point changes to:
class Point inherits from DrawableObject {

attributes:
int x, y
methods:
setX(int newX)
getX()
setY(int newY)
getY()
print() /* Redefine for Point */
}
We are now able to force every drawable object to have a method called print which should
provide functionality to draw the object within the drawing area. The superclass of all drawable
objects, class DrawableObject, does not provide any functionality for drawing itself. It is not
intended to create objects from it. This class rather specifies properties which must be defined by
every derived class. We refer to this special type of classes as abstract classes:
Definition (Abstract Class) A class A is called abstract class if it is only used as a superclass for
other classes. Class A only specifies properties. It is not used to create objects. Derived classes
must define the properties of A.
Abstract classes allow us to structure our inheritance graph. However, we actually don't want to
create objects from them: we only want to express common characteristics of a set of classes.
5.5 Exercises
1.
Inheritance. Consider the drawing program example again.
(a)
Define class Rectangle by inheriting from class Point. The point should indicate the upper left
corner of the rectangle. What are your class attributes? What additional methods do you
introduce?
(b)
All current examples are based on a two-dimensional view. You now want to introduce 3D
objects such as spheres, cubes or cuboids. Design a class Sphere by using a class 3D-Point.
Specify the role of the point in a sphere. What relationship do you use between
class Point and 3D-Point?
(c)
What functionality does move() provide for 3D objects? Be as precise as you can.
(d)
Draw the inheritance graph including the following

classes DrawableObject, Point, Circle, Rectangle, 3D-Point and Sphere.
(e)
Have a look at the inheritance graph of Figure 5.8.
Figure 5.8: Alternative inheritance graph for class Sphere.
A corresponding definition might look like this:
class Sphere inherits from Circle {

attributes:
int z /* Add third dimension */
methods:
setZ(int newZ)
getZ()
}
Give reasons for advantages/disadvantages of this alternative.
2.
Multiple inheritance. Compare the inheritance graph shown in Figure 5.9 with that of Figure 5.7.
Here, we illustrate that B and C have each their own copy of A.
Figure 5.9: Illustration of the second multiple inheritance semantics.
What naming conflicts can occur? Try to define cases by playing with simple example
classes.
6 Even More Object-Oriented Concepts
Peter Müller
We continue with our tour through the world of object-oriented concepts by presenting a short
introduction to static versus dynamic binding. With this, we can introduce polymorphism as a
mechanism which let objects figure out what to do at runtime. But first, here is a brief overview
about generic types.
6.1 Generic Types
We already know generic types from chapter 3 when we have talked about generic abstract data
types. When defining a class, we actually define a user defined type. Some of these types can
operate on other types. For example, there could be lists of apples, list of cars, lists of complex
numbers of even lists of lists.
At the time, when we write down a class definition, we must be able to say that this class should
define a generic type. However, we don't know with which types the class will be used.
Consequently, we must be able to define the class with help of a ``placeholder'' to which we refer
as if it is the type on which the class operates. Thus, the class definition provides us with
a template of an actual class. The actual class definition is created once we declare a particular
object. Let's illustrate this with the following example. Suppose, you want to define a list class
which should be a generic type. Thus, it should be possible to declare list objects for apples, cars
or any other type.
template class List for T {

attributes:
... /* Data structure needed to implement */
/* the list */
methods:
append(T element)
T getFirst()
T getNext()
bool more()
}
The above template class List looks like any other class definition. However, the first line
declares List to be a template for various types. The identifier T is used as a placeholder for an
actual type. For example, append() takes one element as an argument. The type of this element
will be the data type with which an actual list object is created. For example, we can declare a
list object for apples if a definition fot the type Apple exists:
List for Apple appleList

Apple anApple,
anotherApple
appleList.append(anotherApple)
appleList.append(anApple)
The first line declares appleList to be a list for apples. At this time, the compiler uses the
template definition, substitutes every occurrence of T with Apple and creates an actual class
definition for it. This leads to a class definition similar to the one that follows:
class List {
attributes:
... /* Data structure needed to implement */
/* the list */
methods:
append(Apple element)
Apple getFirst()
Apple getNext()
bool more()
}
This is not exactly, what the compiler generates. The compiler must ensure that we can create
multiple lists for different types at any time. For example, if we need another list for, say pears,
we can write:
List for Apple appleList

List for Pear pearList
...
In both cases the compiler generates an actual class definition. The reason why both do not
conflict by their name is that the compiler generates unique names. However, since this is not
viewable to us, we don't go in more detail here. In any case, if you declare just another list of
apples, the compiler can figure out if there already is an actual class definition and use it or if it
has to be created. Thus,
List for Apple aList

List for Apple anotherList
will create the actual class definition for aList and will reuse it for anotherList. Consequently,
both are of the same type. We summarize this in the following definition:
Definition (Template Class) If a class A is parameterized with a data type B, A is

called template class. Once an object of A is created, B is replaced by an actual data type. This
allows the definition of an actual class based on the template specified for A and the actual data
type.
We are able to define template classes with more than one parameter. For
example, directories are collections of objects where each object can be referenced by a key. Of
course, a directory should be able to store any type of object. But there are also various
possibilities for keys. For instance, they might be strings or numbers. Consequently, we would
define a template class Directory which is based on two type parameters, one for the key and one
for the stored objects.
6.2 Static and Dynamic Binding

In strongly typed programming languages you typically have to declare variables prior to their
use. This also implies the variable's definition where the compiler reserves space for the variable.
For example, in Pascal an expression like
var i : integer;
declares variable i to be of type integer. Additionally, it defines enough memory space to hold an
integer value.
With the declaration we bind the name i to the type integer. This binding is true within the scope
in which i is declared. This enables the compiler to check at compilation time for type
consistency. For example, the following assignment will result in a type mismatch error when
you try to compile it:
var i : integer;
...
i := 'string';
We call this particular type of binding ``static'' because it is fixed at compile time.
Definition (Static Binding) If the type T of a variable is explicitly associated with its name N by
declaration, we say, that N is statically bound to T. The association process is called static
binding.
There exist programming languages which are not using explicitly typed variables. For example,
some languages allow to introduce variables once they are needed:
... /* No appearance of i */
i := 123 /* Creation of i as an integer */
The type of i is known as soon as its value is set. In this case, i is of type integer since we have
assigned a whole number to it. Thus, because the content of i is a whole number, the type of i is
integer.
Definition (Dynamic Binding) If the type T of a variable with name N is implicitly associated by
its content, we say, that N is dynamically bound to T. The association process is called dynamic
binding.
Both bindings differ in the time when the type is bound to the variable. Consider the following
example which is only possible with dynamic binding:
if somecondition() == TRUE then

n := 123
else
n := 'abc'
endif
The type of n after the if statement depends on the evaluation of somecondition(). If it is

TRUE, n is of type integer whereas in the other case it is of type string.
6.3 Polymorphism
Polymorphism allows an entity (for example, variable, function or object) to take a variety of
representations. Therefore we have to distinguish different types of polymorphism which will be
outlined here.
The first type is similar to the concept of dynamic binding. Here, the type of a variable depends
on its content. Thus, its type depends on the content at a specific time:
v := 123 /* v is integer */
... /* use v as integer */
v := 'abc' /* v "switches" to string */
... /* use v as string */
Definition (Polymorphism (1)) The concept of dynamic binding allows a variable to take
different types dependent on the content at a particular time. This ability of a variable is
called polymorphism. Another type of polymorphism can be defined for functions. For example,
suppose you want to define a function isNull() which returns TRUE if its argument is 0 (zero)
and FALSE otherwise. For integer numbers this is easy:
boolean isNull(int i) {
if (i == 0) then
return TRUE
else
return FALSE
endif
}
However, if we want to check this for real numbers, we should use another comparison due to
the precision problem:
boolean isNull(real r) {
if (r < 0.01 and r > -0.99) then
return TRUE
else
return FALSE
endif
}
In both cases we want the function to have the name isNull. In programming languages without
polymorphism for functions we cannot declare these two functions because the
name isNull would be doubly defined. Without polymorphism for functions, doubly defined
names would be ambiguous. However, if the language would take the parameters of the function
into account it would work. Thus, functions (or methods) are uniquely identified by:
 the name of the function (or method) and

 the types of its parameter list.
Since the parameter list of both isNull functions differ, the compiler is able to figure out the
correct function call by using the actual types of the arguments:
var i : integer
var r : real
i = 0
r = 0.0
...
if (isNull(i)) then ... /* Use isNull(int) */

...
if (isNull(r)) then ... /* Use isNull(real) */
Definition (Polymorphism (2)) If a function (or method) is defined by the combination of
 its name and

 the list of types of its parameters
we speak of polymorphism. This type of polymorphism allows us to reuse the same name for functions
(or methods) as long as the parameter list differs. Sometimes this type of polymorphism is
called overloading.
The last type of polymorphism allows an object to choose correct methods. Consider the
function move() again, which takes an object of class Point as its argument. We have used this
function with any object of derived classes, because the is-a relation holds.
Now consider a function display() which should be used to display drawable objects. The
declaration of this function might look like this:
display(DrawableObject o) {
...
o.print()
...
}
We would like to use this function with objects of classes derived from DrawableObject:
Circle acircle
Point apoint
Rectangle arectangle
display(apoint) /* Should invoke apoint.print() */

display(acircle) /* Should invoke acircle.print() */
display(arectangle) /* Should invoke arectangle.print() */
The actual method should be defined by the content of the object o of function display(). Since
this is somewhat complicated, here is a more abstract example:
class Base {
attributes:
methods:
virtual foo()
bar()
}
class Derived inherits from Base {

attributes:
methods:
virtual foo()
bar()
}
demo(Base o) {
o.foo()
o.bar()
}
Base abase
Derived aderived
demo(abase)
demo(aderived)
In this example we define two classes Base and Derived. Each class defines two
methods foo() and bar(). The first method is defined as virtual. This means that if this method
is invoked its definition should be evaluated by the content of the object.
We then define a function demo() which takes a Base object as its argument. Consequently, we
can use this function with objects of class Derived as the is-a relation holds. We call this function
with a Base object and a Derived object, respectively.
Suppose, that foo() and bar() are defined to just print out their name and the class in which they
are defined. Then the output is as follows:
foo() of Base called.

bar() of Base called.
foo() of Derived called.
bar() of Base called.
Why is this so? Let's see what happens. The first call to demo() uses a Base object. Thus, the
function's argument is ``filled'' with an object of class Base. When it is time to invoke
method foo() it's actual functionality is chosen based on the current content of the corresponding
object o. This time, it is a Base object. Consequently, foo() as defined in class Base is called.
The call to bar() is not subject to this content resolution. It is not marked as virtual.
Consequently, bar() is called in the scope of class Base.
The second call to demo() takes a Derived object as its argument. Thus, the argument o is filled
with a Derived object. However, o itself just represents the Base part of the provided
object aderived.
Now, the call to foo() is evaluated by examining the content of o, hence, it is called within the
scope of Derived. On the other hand, bar() is still evaluated within the scope of Base.
Definition (Polymorphism (3)) Objects of superclasses can be filled with objects of their
subclasses. Operators and methods of subclasses can be defined to be evaluated in two
contextes:
1.
Based on object type, leading to an evaluation within the scope of the superclass.
2.
Based on object content, leading to an evaluation within the scope of the contained subclass.
The second type is called polymorphism.
7 Introduction to C++
Peter Müller
This section is the first part of the introduction to C++. Here we focus on C from which C++ was
adopted. C++ extends the C programming language with strong typing, some features and - most
importantly - object-oriented concepts.
7.1 The C Programming Language

Developed in the late 1970s, C gained an huge success due to the development of UNIX which
was almost entirely written in this language [4]. In contrast to other high level languages, C was
written by programmers for programmers. Thus it allows sometimes, say, weird things which in
other languages such as Pascal are forbidden due to its bad influence on programming style.
Anyway, when used with some discipline, C is as good a language as any other.
The comment in C is enclosed in /* ... */. Comments cannot be nested.
7.1.1 Data Types

Table 7.1 describes the built-in data types of C. The specified Size is measured in bytes on a 386
PC running Linux 1.2.13. The provided Domain is based on the Size value. You can obtain
information about the size of a data type with the sizeof operator.
Table 7.1: Built-in types.

Variables of these types are defined simply by preceeding the name with the type:
int an_int;
float a_float;
long long a_very_long_integer;
With struct you can combine several different types together. In other languages this is
sometimes called a record:
struct date_s {
int day, month, year;
} aDate;
The above definition of aDate is also the declaration of a structure called date_s. We can define
other variables of this type by referencing the structure by name:
struct date_s anotherDate;
We do not have to name structures. If we omit the name, we just cannot reuse it. However, if we
name a structure, we can just declare it without defining a variable:
struct time_s {
int hour, minute, second;
};
We are able to use this structure as shown for anotherDate. This is very similar to a type
definition known in other languages where a type is declared prior to the definition of a variable
of this type.
Variables must be defined prior to their use. These definitions must occur before any statement,
thus they form the topmost part within a statement block.
7.1.2 Statements
C defines all usual flow control statements. Statements are terminated by a semicolon ``;''. We
can group multiple statements into blocks by enclosing them in curly brackets. Within each
block, we can define new variables:
{
int i; /* Define a global i */
i = 1; /* Assign i the value 0 */
{ /* Begin new block */
int i; /* Define a local i */
i = 2; /* Set its value to 2 */
} /* Close block */
/* Here i is again 1 from the outer block */
}
Table 7.2 lists all flow control statements:
Table 7.2: Statements.

The for statement is the only statement which really differs from for statements known from
other languages. All other statements more or less only differ in their syntax. What follows are
two blocks which are totally equal in their functionality. One uses the while loop while the other
the for variant:
{
int ix, sum;
sum = 0;
ix = 0; /* initialization */
while (ix < 10) { /* condition */
sum = sum + 1;
ix = ix + 1; /* step */
}
}
{
int ix, sum;
sum = 0;
for (ix = 0; ix < 10; ix = ix + 1)
sum = sum + 1;
}
To understand this, you have to know, that an assignment is an expression.
7.1.3 Expressions and Operators

In C almost everything is an expression. For example, the assignment statement ``='' returns the
value of its righthand operand. As a ``side effect'' it also sets the value of the lefthand operand.
Thus,
ix = 12;
sets the value of ix to 12 (assuming that ix has an appropriate type). Now that the assignment is
also an expression, we can combine several of them; for example:
kx = jx = ix = 12;
What happens? The first assignment assigns kx the value of its righthand side. This is the value
of the assignment to jx. But this is the value of the assignment to ix. The value of this latter is 12
which is returned to jx which is returned to kx. Thus we have expressed
ix = 12;
jx = 12;
kx = 12;
in one line.
Truth in C is defined as follows. The value 0 (zero) stands for FALSE. Any other value is TRUE.
For example, the standard function strcmp() takes two strings as argument and returns -1 if the
first is lower than the second, 0 if they are equal and 1 if the first is greater than the second one.
To compare if two strings str1 and str2 are equal you often see the following if construct:
if (!strcmp(str1, str2)) {
/* str1 equals str2 */
}
else {
/* str1 does not equal str2 */
}
The exclamation mark indicates the boolean NOT. Thus the expression evaluates to TRUE only
if strcmp() returns 0.
Expressions are combined of both terms and operators. The first could be constansts, variables
or expressions. From the latter, C offers all operators known from other languages. However, it
offers some operators which could be viewed as abbreviations to combinations of other
operators. Table 7.3 lists available operators. The second column shows their priority where
smaller numbers indicate higher priority and same numbers, same priority. The last column lists
the order of evaluation.
Table 7.3: Operators.

Most of these operators are already known to you. However, some need some more description.
First of all notice that the binary boolean operators &, ^ and | are of lower priority than the
equality operators == and !=. Consequently, if you want to check for bit patterns as in
if ((pattern & MASK) == MASK) {

...
}
you must enclose the binary operation into parenthesis .
The increment operators ++ and can be explained by the following example. If you have the
following statement sequence
a = a + 1;
b = a;
you can use the preincrement operator
b = ++a;
Similarly, if you have the following order of statements:
b = a;
a = a + 1;
you can use the postincrement operator
b = a++;
Thus, the preincrement operator first increments its associated variable and then returns the new
value, whereas the postincrement operator first returns the value and then increments its variable.
The same rules apply to the pre- and postdecrement operator .
Function calls, nested assignments and the increment/decrement operators cause side effects
when they are applied. This may introduce compiler dependencies as the evaluation order in
some situations is compiler dependent. Consider the following example which demonstrates this:
a[i] = i++;
The question is, whether the old or new value of i is used as the subscript into the
array a depends on the order the compiler uses to evaluate the assignment.
The conditional operator ?: is an abbreviation for a commonly used if statement. For example
to assign max the maximum of a and b we can use the following if statement:
if (a > b)
max = a;
else
max = b;
These types of if statements can be shorter written as
max = (a > b) ? a : b;
The next unusual operator is the operator assignment. We are often using assignments of the
following form
expr1 = (expr1) op (expr2)
for example
i = i * (j + 1);
In these assignments the lefthand value also appears on the right side. Using informal speech we
could express this as ``set the value of i to the current value of i multiplied by the sum of the
value of j and 1''. Using a more natural way, we would rather say ``Multiply i with the sum of the
value of j and 1''. C allows us to abbreviate these types of assignments to
i *= j + 1;
We can do that with almost all binary operators. Note, that the above operator assignment really
implements the long form although ``j + 1'' is not in parenthesis.
The last unusal operator is the comma operator ,. It is best explained by an example:
i = 0;
j = (i += 1, i += 2, i + 3);
This operator takes its arguments and evaluates them from left to right and returns the value of
the rightmost expression. Thus, in the above example, the operator first evaluates `ì += 1''
which, as a side effect, increments the value of i. Then the next expression `ì += 2'' is evaluated
which adds 2 to i leading to a value of 3. The third expression is evaluated and its value returned
as the operator's result. Thus, j is assigned 6.
The comma operator introduces a particular pitfall when using n-dimensional arrays with .
A frequent error is to use a comma separated list of indices to try to access an element:
int matrix[10][5]; // 2-dim matrix

int i;
...
i = matrix[1,2]; // WON'T WORK!!
i = matrix[1][2]; // OK
What actually happens in the first case is, that the comma separated list is interpreted as the
comma operator. Consequently, the result is 2 which leads to an assignment of the address to the
third five elements of the matrix!
Some of you might wonder, what C does with values which are not used. For example in the
assignment statements we have seen before,
ix = 12;
jx = 12;
kx = 12;
we have three lines which each return 12. The answer is, that C ignores values which are not
used. This leads to some strange things. For example, you could write something like this:
ix = 1;
4711;
jx = 2;
But let's forget about these strange things. Let's come back to something more useful. Let's talk
about functions.
7.1.4 Functions
As C is a procedural language it allows the definition of functions. Procedures are ``simulated''
by functions returning ``no value''. This value is a special type called void.
Functions are declared similar to variables, but they enclose their arguments in parenthesis (even
if there are no arguments, the parenthesis must be specified):
int sum(int to); /* Declaration of sum with one argument */

int bar(); /* Declaration of bar with no arguments */
void foo(int ix, int jx);
/* Declaration of foo with two arguments */
To actually define a function, just add its body:
int sum(int to) {

int ix, ret;
ret = 0;
for (ix = 0; ix < to; ix = ix + 1)
ret = ret + ix;
return ret; /* return function's value */
} /* sum */
C only allows you to pass function arguments by value. Consequently you cannot change the
value of one argument in the function. If you must pass an argument by reference you must
program it on your own. You therefore use pointers.
7.1.5 Pointers and Arrays

One of the most common problems in programming in C (and sometimes C++) is the
understanding of pointers and arrays. In C (C++) both are highly related with some small but
essential differences. You declare a pointer by putting an asterisk between the data type and the
name of the variable or function:
char *strp; /* strp is `pointer to char' */

You access the content of a pointer by dereferencing it using again the asterisk:
*strp = 'a'; /* A single character */
As in other languages, you must provide some space for the value to which the pointer points. A
pointer to characters can be used to point to a sequence of characters: the string. Strings in C are
terminated by a special character NUL (0 or as char ' '). Thus, you can have strings of any
length. Strings are enclosed in double quotes:
strp = "hello";
In this case, the compiler automatically adds the terminating NUL character. Now, strp points to
a sequence of 6 characters. The first character is `h', the second è' and so forth. We can access
these characters by an index in strp:
strp[0] /* h */
strp[1] /* e */
strp[2] /* l */
strp[3] /* l */
strp[4] /* o */
strp[5] /* \0 */
The first character also equals ``*strp'' which can be written as ``*(strp + 0)''. This leads to
something called pointer arithmetic and which is one of the powerful features of C. Thus, we
have the following equations:
*strp == *(strp + 0) == strp[0]

*(strp + 1) == strp[1]
*(strp + 2) == strp[2]
...
Note that these equations are true for any data type. The addition is not oriented to bytes, it is
oriented to the size of the corresponding pointer type!
The strp pointer can be set to other locations. Its destination may vary. In contrast to
that, arrays are fix pointers. They point to a predefined area of memory which is specified in
brackets:
char str[6];
You can view str to be a constant pointer pointing to an area of 6 characters. We are not allowed
to use it like this:
str = "hallo"; /* ERROR */
because this would mean, to change the pointer to point to 'h'. We must copy the string into the
provided memory area. We therefore use a function called strcpy() which is part of the
standard C library.
strcpy(str, "hallo"); /* Ok */
Note however, that we can use str in any case where a pointer to a character is expected, because
it is a (fixed) pointer.
7.1.6 A First Program

Here we introduce the first program which is so often used: a program which prints ``Hello,
world!'' to your screen:
#include <stdio.h>
/* Global variables should be here */
/* Function definitions should be here */
int
main() {
puts("Hello, world!");
return 0;
} /* main */
The first line looks something strange. Its explanation requires some information about how C
(and C++) programs are handled by the compiler. The compilation step is roughly divided into
two steps. The first step is called ``preprocessing'' and is used to prepare raw C code. In this case
this step takes the first line as an argument to include a file called stdio.h into the source. The
angle brackets just indicate, that the file is to be searched in the standard search path configured
for your compiler. The file itself provides some declarations and definitions for standard
input/output. For example, it declares a function called put(). The preprocessing step also deletes
the comments.
In the second step the generated raw C code is compiled to an executable. Each executable must
define a function called main(). It is this function which is called once the program is started.
This function returns an integer which is returned as the program's exit status.
Function main() can take arguments which represent the command line parameters. We just
introduce them here but do not explain them any further:
#include <stdio.h>
int
main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
int ix;
for (ix = 0; ix < argc; ix++)
printf("My %d. argument is %s\n", ix, argv[ix]);
return 0;
} /* main */
The first argument argc just returns the number of arguments given on the command line. The
second argument argv is an array of strings. (Recall that strings are represented by pointers to
characters. Thus, argv is an array of pointers to characters.)
7.2 What Next?

This section is far from complete. We only want to give you an expression of what C is. We also
want to introduce some basic concepts which we will use in the following section. Some
concepts of C are improved in C++. For example, C++ introduces the concept
of references which allow something similar to call by reference in function calls.
We suggest that you take your local compiler and start writing a few programs (if you are not
already familiar with C, of course). One problem for beginners often is that existing library
functions are unknown. If you have a UNIX system try to use the man command to get some
descriptions. Especially you might want to try:
man gets
man printf
man puts
man scanf
man strcpy
We also suggest, that you get yourself a good book about C (or to find one of the on-line
tutorials). We try to explain everything we introduce in the next sections. However, there is
nothign wrong with having some reference at hand.
8 From C To C++
Peter Müller
This section presents extensions to the C language which were introduced by C++ [6]. It also
deals with object-oriented concepts and their realization.
8.1 Basic Extensions

The following sections present extensions to already introduced concepts of C. Section 8.2 presents
object-oriented extensions.
C++ adds a new comment which is introduced by two slashes (//) and which lasts until the end of
line. You can use both comment styles, for example to comment out large blocks of code:
/* C comment can include // and can span over

several lines. */
// /* This is the C++ style comment */ until end of line
In C you must define variables at the beginning of a block. C++ allows you to define variables
and objects at any position in a block. Thus, variables and objects should be defined where they
are used.
8.1.1 Data Types

C++ introduces a new data type called reference. You can think of them as if they were `àliases''
to ``real'' variables or objects. As an alias cannot exist without its corresponding real part, you
cannot define single references. The ampersand (&) is used to define a reference. For example:
int ix; /* ix is "real" variable */

int &rx = ix; /* rx is "alias" for ix */
ix = 1; /* also rx == 1 */
rx = 2; /* also ix == 2 */
References can be used as function arguments and return values. This allows to pass parameters
as reference or to return a ``handle'' to a calculated variable or object.
The table 8.1 is adopted from [1] and provides you with an overview of possible declarations. It
is not complete in that it shows not every possible combination and some of them have not been
introduced here, because we are not going to use them. However, these are the ones which you
will probably use very often.
Table 8.1: Declaration expressions.

In C and C++ you can use the modifier const to declare particular aspects of a variable (or
object) to be constant. The next table 8.2 lists possible combinations and describe their meaning.
Subsequently, some examples are presented which demonstrate the use of const.
Table 8.2: Constant declaration expresssions.
Now let's investigate some examples of contant variables and how to use them. Consider the
following declarations (again from [1]):
int i; // just an ordinary integer

int *ip; // uninitialized pointer to
// integer
int * const cp = &i; // constant pointer to integer
const int ci = 7; // constant integer
const int *cip; // pointer to constant integer
const int * const cicp = &ci; // constant pointer to constant
// integer
The following assignments are valid:
i = ci; // assign constant integer to integer

*cp = ci; // assign constant integer to variable
// which is referenced by constant pointer
cip = &ci; // change pointer to constant integer
cip = cicp; // set pointer to constant integer to
// reference variable of constant pointer to
// constant integer
The following assignments are invalid:
ci = 8; // cannot change constant integer value

*cip = 7; // cannot change constant integer referenced
// by pointer
cp = &ci; // cannot change value of constant pointer
ip = cip; // this would allow to change value of
// constant integer *cip with *ip
When used with references some peculiarities must be considered. See the following example
program:
#include <stdio.h>
int main() {
const int ci = 1;
const int &cr = ci;
int &r = ci; // create temporary integer for reference
// cr = 7; // cannot assign value to constant reference
r = 3; // change value of temporary integer
print("ci == %d, r == %d\n", ci, r);
return 0;
}
When compiled with GNU g++, the compiler issues the following warning:
conversion from `const int' to ìnt &' discards const
What actually happens is, that the compiler automatically creates a temporay integer variable
with value of ci to which reference r is initialized. Consequently, when changing r the value of
the temporary integer is changed. This temporary variable lives as long as reference r.
Reference cr is defined as read-only (constant reference). This disables its use on the left side of
assignments. You may want to remove the comment in front of the particular line to check out
the resulting error message of your compiler.
8.1.2 Functions
C++ allows function overloading as defined in section 6.3. For example, we can define two
different functions max(), one which returns the maximum of two integers and one which returns
the maximum of two strings:
#include <stdio.h>
int max(int a, int b) {

if (a > b) return a;
return b;
}
char *max(char *a, char * b) {

if (strcmp(a, b) > 0) return a;
return b;
}
int main() {
printf("max(19, 69) = %d\n", max(19, 69));
printf("max(abc, def) = %s\n", max("abc", "def"));
return 0;
}
The above example program defines these two functions which differ in their parameter list,
hence, they define two different functions. The first printf() call in function main() issues a call
to the first version of max(), because it takes two integers as its argument. Similarly, the
second printf() call leads to a call of the second version of max().
References can be used to provide a function with an alias of an actual function call argument.
This enables to change the value of the function call argument as it is known from other
languages with call-by-reference parameters:
void foo(int byValue, int &byReference) {

byValue = 42;
byReference = 42;
}
void bar() {
int ix, jx;
ix = jx = 1;
foo(ix, jx);
/* ix == 1, jx == 42 */
}
8.2 First Object-oriented Extensions

In this section we present how the object-oriented concepts of section 4 are used in C++.
8.2.1 Classes and Objects

C++ allows the declaration and definition of classes. Instances of classes are called objects.
Recall the drawing program example of section 5 again. There we have developed a class Point.
In C++ this would look like this:
class Point {
int _x, _y; // point coordinates
public: // begin interface section

void setX(const int val);
void setY(const int val);
int getX() { return _x; }
int getY() { return _y; }
};
Point apoint;
This declares a class Point and defines an object apoint. You can think of a class definition as a
structure definition with functions (or ``methods''). Additionally, you can specify the access
rights in more detail. For example, _x and _y are private, because elements of classes are private
as default. Consequently, we explicitly must ``switch'' the access rights to declare the following
to be public. We do that by using the keyword public followed by a colon: Every element
following this keyword are now accessible from outside of the class.
We can switch back to private access rights by starting a private section with private:. This is
possible as often as needed:
class Foo {
// private as default ...
public:
// what follows is public until ...
private:
// ... here, where we switch back to private ...
public:
// ... and back to public.
};
Recall that a structure struct is a combination of various data elements which are accessible
from the outside. We are now able to express a structure with help of a class, where all elements
are declared to be public:
class Struct {
public: // Structure elements are public by default
// elements, methods
};
This is exactly what C++ does with struct. Structures are handled like classes. Whereas
elements of classes (defined with class) are private by default, elements of structures (defined
with struct) are public. However, we can also use private: to switch to a private section in
structures.
Let's come back to our class Point. Its interface starts with the public section where we define
four methods. Two for each coordinate to set and get its value. The set methods are only
declared. Their actual functionality is still to be defined. The get methods have a function body:
They are defined within the class or, in other words, they are inlined methods.
This type of method definition is useful for small and simple bodies. It also improve
performance, because bodies of inlined methods are ``copied'' into the code wherever a call to
such a method takes place.
On the contrary, calls to the set methods would result in a ``real'' function call. We define these
methods outside of the class declaration. This makes it necessary, to indicate to which class a
method definition belongs to. For example, another class might just define a
method setX() which is quite different from that of Point. We must be able to define the scope of
the definition; we therefore use the scope operator ``::'':
void Point::setX(const int val) {

_x = val;
}
void Point::setY(const int val) {

_y = val;
}
Here we define method setX() (setY()) within the scope of class Point. The object apoint can use
these methods to set and get information about itself:
Point apoint;
apoint.setX(1); // Initialization
apoint.setY(1);
//
// x is needed from here, hence, we define it here and
// initialize it to the x-coordinate of apoint
//
int x = apoint.getX();
The question arises about how the methods ``know'' from which object they are invoked. This is
done by implicitly passing a pointer to the invoking object to the method. We can access this
pointer within the methods as this. The definitions of methods setX() and setY() make use of
class members _x and _y, respectively. If invoked by an object, these members are
`àutomatically'' mapped to the correct object. We could use this to illustrate what actually
happens:
void Point::setX(const int val) {

this->_x = val; // Use this to reference invoking
// object
}
void Point::setY(const int val) {

this->_y = val;
}
Here we explicitly use the pointer this to explicitly dereference the invoking object.
Fortunately, the compiler automatically `ìnserts'' these dereferences for class members, hence,
we really can use the first definitions of setX() and setY(). However, it sometimes make sense to
know that there is a pointer this available which indicates the invoking object.
Currently, we need to call the set methods to initialize a point object . However, we would like
to initialize the point when we define it. We therefore use special methods called constructors.
8.2.2 Constructors
Constructors are methods which are used to initialize an object at its definition time. We extend our
class Point such that it initializes a point to coordinates (0, 0):
class Point {
int _x, _y;
public:
Point() {
_x = _y = 0;
}

};
Constructors have the same name of the class (thus they are identified to be constructors). They
have no return value. As other methods, they can take arguments. For example, we may want to
initialize a point to other coordinates than (0, 0). We therefore define a second constructor taking
two integer arguments within the class:
class Point {
int _x, _y;
public:
Point() {
_x = _y = 0;
}
Point(const int x, const int y) {
_x = x;
_y = y;
}
};
Constructors are implicitly called when we define objects of their classes:
Point apoint; // Point::Point()

Point bpoint(12, 34); // Point::Point(const int, const int)
With constructors we are able to initialize our objects at definition time as we have requested it
in section 2 for our singly linked list. We are now able to define a class List where the
constructors take care of correctly initializing its objects.
If we want to create a point from another point, hence, copying the properties of one object to a
newly created one, we sometimes have to take care of the copy process. For example, consider
the class List which allocates dynamically memory for its elements. If we want to create a second
list which is a copy of the first, we must allocate memory and copy the individual elements. In
our class Point we therefore add a third constructor which takes care of correctly copying values
from one object to the newly created one:
class Point {
int _x, _y;
public:
Point() {
_x = _y = 0;
}
_x = x;
_y = y;
}
Point(const Point &from) {
_x = from._x;
_y = from._y;
}

};
The third constructor takes a constant reference to an object of class Point as an argument and
assigns _x and _y the corresponding values of the provided object.
This type of constructor is so important that it has its own name: copy constructor. It is highly
recommended that you provide for each of your classes such a constructor, even if it is as simple
as in our example. The copy constructor is called in the following cases:
Point apoint; // Point::Point()
Point bpoint(apoint); // Point::Point(const Point &)
Point cpoint = apoint; // Point::Point(const Point &)
With help of constructors we have fulfilled one of our requirements of implementation of

abstract data types: Initialization at definition time. We still need a mechanism which
automatically ``destroys'' an object when it gets invalid (for example, because of leaving its
scope). Therefore, classes can define destructors.
8.2.3 Destructors
Consider a class List. Elements of the list are dynamically appended and removed. The constructor
helps us in creating an initial empty list. However, when we leave the scope of the definition of a list
object, we must ensure that the allocated memory is released. We therefore define a special method
called destructor which is called once for each object at its destruction time:
void foo() {
List alist; // List::List() initializes to
// empty list.
... // add/remove elements
} // Destructor call!
Destruction of objects take place when the object leaves its scope of definition or is explicitly
destroyed. The latter happens, when we dynamically allocate an object and release it when it is
no longer needed.
Destructors are declared similar to constructors. Thus, they also use the name prefixed by a tilde
(~ ) of the defining class:
class Point {
int _x, _y;
public:
Point() {
_x = _y = 0;
}
_x = xval;
_y = yval;
}
Point(const Point &from) {
_x = from._x;
_y = from._y;
}
~Point() { /* Nothing to do! */ }

};
Destructors take no arguments. It is even invalid to define one, because destructors are implicitly
called at destruction time: You have no chance to specify actual arguments.
9 More on C++
Peter Müller
This section concludes our introduction to C++. We introduce ``real'' object-oriented concepts
and we answer the question, how a C++ program is actually written.
9.1 Inheritance
In our pseudo language, we formulate inheritance with `ìnherits from''. In C++ these words are
replaced by a colon. As an example let's design a class for 3D points. Of course we want to reuse our
already existing class Point. We start designing our class as follows:
class Point3D : public Point {
int _z;
public:
Point3D() {
setX(0);
setY(0);
_z = 0;
}
Point3D(const int x, const int y, const int z) {
setX(x);
setY(y);
_z = z;
}
~Point3D() { /* Nothing to do */ }
int getZ() { return _z; }

void setZ(const int val) { _z = val; }
};
9.1.1 Types of Inheritance

You might notice again the keyword public used in the first line of the class definition (its signature).
This is necessary because C++ distinguishes two types of inheritance: public and private. As a default,
classes are privately derived from each other. Consequently, we must explicitly tell the compiler to use
public inheritance.
The type of inheritance influences the access rights to elements of the various superclasses.
Using public inheritance, everything which is declared private in a superclass
remains private in the subclass. Similarly, everything which is public remains public. When
using private inheritance the things are quite different as is shown in table 9.1.
Table 9.1: Access rights and inheritance.
The leftmost column lists possible access rights for elements of classes. It also includes a third
type protected. This type is used for elements which should be directly usable in subclasses but
which should not be accessible from the outside. Thus, one could say elements of this type are
between private and public elements in that they can be used within the class hierarchy rooted
by the corresponding class.
The second and third column show the resulting access right of the elements of a superclass
when the subclass is privately and publically derived, respectively.
9.1.2 Construction
When we create an instance of class Point3D its constructor is called. Since Point3D is derived
from Point the constructor of class Point is also called. However, this constructor is called before the
body of the constructor of class Point3D is executed. In general, prior to the execution of the particular
constructor body, constructors of every superclass are called to initialize their part of the created object.
When we create an object with
Point3D point(1, 2, 3);
the second constructor of Point3D is invoked. Prior to the execution of the constructor body, the
constructor Point() is invoked, to initialize the point part of object point. Fortunately, we have
defined a constructor which takes no arguments. This constructor initializes the 2D
coordinates _x and _y to 0 (zero). As Point3D is only derived from Point there are no other
constructor calls and the body of Point3D(const int, const int, const int) is executed. Here we
invoke methods setX() and setY() to explicitly override the 2D coordinates. Subsequently, the
value of the third coordinate _z is set.
This is very unsatisfactory as we have defined a constructor Point() which takes two arguments
to initialize its coordinates to them. Thus we must only be able to tell, that instead of using
the default constructor Point() the paramterized Point(const int, const int) should be used. We
can do that by specifying the desired constructors after a single colon just before the body of
constructor Point3D():
class Point3D : public Point {

...
public:
Point3D() { ... }
Point3D(
const int x,
const int y,
const int z) : Point(x, y) {
_z = z;
}
...
};
If we would have more superclasses we simply provide their constructor calls as a comma
separated list. We also use this mechanism to create contained objects. For example, suppose that
class Part only defines a constructor with one argument. Then to correctly create an object of
class Compound we must invoke Part() with its argument:
class Compound {
Part part;
...
public:
Compound(const int partParameter) : part(partParameter) {
...
}
...
};
This dynamic initialization can also be used with built-in data types. For example, the
constructors of class Point could be written as:
Point() : _x(0), _y(0) {}

Point(const int x, const int y) : _x(x), _y(y) {}
You should use this initialization method as often as possible, because it allows the compiler to
create variables and objects correctly initialized instead of creating them with a default value and
to use an additional assignment (or other mechanism) to set its value.
9.1.3 Destruction
If an object is destroyed, for example by leaving its definition scope, the destructor of the
corresponding class is invoked. If this class is derived from other classes their destructors are also called,
leading to a recursive call chain.
9.1.4 Multiple Inheritance

C++ allows a class to be derived from more than one superclass, as was already briefly mentioned in
previous sections. You can easily derive from more than one class by specifying the superclasses in a
comma separated list:
class DrawableString : public Point, public DrawableObject {
...
public:
DrawableString(...) :
Point(...),
DrawableObject(...) {
...
}
~DrawableString() { ... }
...
};
We will not use this type of inheritance in the remainder of this tutorial. Therefore we will not go
into further detail here.
9.2 Polymorphism
In our pseudo language we are able to declare methods of classes to be virtual, to force their
evaluation to be based on object content rather than object type. We can also use this in C++:
class DrawableObject {
public:
virtual void print();
};
Class DrawableObject defines a method print() which is virtual. We can derive from this class
other classes:
class Point : public DrawableObject {

...
public:
...
void print() { ... }
};
Again, print() is a virtual method, because it inherits this property from DrawableObject. The
function display() which is able to display any kind of drawable object, can then be defined as:
void display(const DrawableObject &obj) {

// prepare anything necessary
obj.print();
}
When using virtual methods some compilers complain if the corresponding class destructor is
not declared virtual as well. This is necessary when using pointers to (virtual) subclasses when it
is time to destroy them. As the pointer is declared as superclass normally its destructor would be
called. If the destructor is virtual, the destructor of the actual referenced object is called (and
then, recursively, all destructors of its superclasses). Here is an example adopted from [1]:
class Colour {
public:
virtual ~Colour();
};
class Red : public Colour {

public:
~Red(); // Virtuality inherited from Colour
};
class LightRed : public Red {

public:
~LightRed();
};
Using these classes, we can define a palette as follows:
Colour *palette[3];
palette[0] = new Red; // Dynamically create a new Red object
palette[1] = new LightRed;
palette[2] = new Colour;
The newly introduced operator new creates a new object of the specified type in dynamic
memory and returns a pointer to it. Thus, the first new returns a pointer to an allocated object of
class Red and assigns it to the first element of array palette. The elements of palette are pointers
to Colour and, because Red is-a Colour the assignment is valid.
The contrary operator to new is delete which explicitly destroys an object referenced by the
provided pointer. If we apply delete to the elements of palette the following destructor calls
happen:
delete palette[0];
// Call destructor ~Red() followed by ~Colour()
delete palette[1];
// Call ~LightRed(), ~Red() and ~Colour()
delete palette[2];
// Call ~Colour()
The various destructor calls only happen, because of the use of virtual destructors. If we would
have not declared them virtual, each delete would have only called ~
Colour() (because palette[i] is of type pointer to Colour).
9.3 Abstract Classes
Abstract classes are defined just as ordinary classes. However, some of their methods are designated to
be necessarily defined by subclasses. We just mention their signature including their return type, name
and parameters but not a definition. One could say, we omit the method body or, in other words,
specify ``nothing''. This is expressed by appending ``= 0'' after the method signatures:
class DrawableObject {
...
public:
...
virtual void print() = 0;
};
This class definition would force every derived class from which objects should be created to
define a method print(). These method declarations are also called pure methods.
Pure methods must also be declared virtual, because we only want to use objects from derived
classes. Classes which define pure methods are called abstract classes.
9.4 Operator Overloading

If we recall the abstract data type for complex numbers, Complex, we could create a C++ class as
follows:
class Complex {
double _real,
_imag;
public:
Complex() : _real(0.0), _imag(0.0) {}
Complex(const double real, const double imag) :
_real(real), _imag(imag) {}
Complex add(const Complex op);

Complex mul(const Complex op);
...
};
We would then be able to use complex numbers and to ``calculate'' with them:
Complex a(1.0, 2.0), b(3.5, 1.2), c;
c = a.add(b);
Here we assign c the sum of a and b. Although absolutely correct, it does not provide a
convenient way of expression. What we would rather like to use is the well-known ``+'' to
express addition of two complex numbers. Fortunately, C++ allows us to overload almost all of
its operators for newly created types. For example, we could define a ``+'' operator for our
class Complex:
class Complex {
...
public:
...
Complex operator +(const Complex &op) {

double real = _real + op._real,
imag = _imag + op._imag;
return(Complex(real, imag));
}
...
};
In this case, we have made operator + a member of class Complex. An expression of the form
c = a + b;
is translated into a method call
c = a.operator +(b);
Thus, the binary operator + only needs one argument. The first argument is implicitly provided
by the invoking object (in this case a).
However, an operator call can also be interpreted as a usual function call, as in
c = operator +(a, b);
In this case, the overloaded operator is not a member of a class. It is rather defined outside as a
normal overloaded function. For example, we could define operator + in this way:
class Complex {
...
public:
...
double real() { return _real; }

double imag() { return _imag; }
// No need to define operator here!

};
Complex operator +(Complex &op1, Complex &op2) {

double real = op1.real() + op2.real(),
imag = op1.imag() + op2.imag();
}
In this case we must define access methods for the real and imaginary parts because the operator
is defined outside of the class's scope. However, the operator is so closely related to the class,
that it would make sense to allow the operator to access the private members. This can be done
by declaring it to be a friend of class Complex.
9.5 Friends
We can define functions or classes to be friends of a class to allow them direct access to its
private data members. For example, in the previous section we would like to have the function
for operator + to have access to the private data members _real and _imag of class Complex.
Therefore we declare operator + to be a friend of class Complex:
class Complex {
...
public:
...
friend Complex operator +(

const Complex &,
const Complex &
);
};
Complex operator +(const Complex &op1, const Complex &op2) {

double real = op1._real + op2._real,
imag = op1._imag + op2._imag;
}
You should not use friends very often because they break the data hiding principle in its
fundamentals. If you have to use friends very often it is always a sign that it is time to restructure
your inheritance graph.
9.6 How to Write a Program

Until now, we have only presented parts of or very small programs which could easily be handled in
one file. However, greater projects, say, a calendar program, should be split into manageable pieces,
often called modules. Modules are implemented in separate files and we will now briefly discuss how
modularization is done in C and C++. This discussion is based on UNIX and the GNU C++ compiler. If you
are using other constellations the following might vary on your side. This is especially important for
those who are using integrated development environments (IDEs), for example, Borland C++.
Roughly speaking, modules consist of two file types: interface descriptions and implementation
files. To distinguish these types, a set of suffixes are used when compiling C and C++ programs.
Table 9.2 shows some of them.
Table 9.2: Extensions and file types.
In this tutorial we will use .h for header files, .cc for C++ files and .tpl for template definition
files. Even if we are writing `ònly'' C code, it makes sense to use .cc to force the compiler to
treat it as C++. This simplifies combination of both, since the internal mechanism of how the
compiler arrange names in the program differs between both languages .
9.6.1 Compilation Steps

The compilation process takes .cc files, preprocess them (removing comments, add header files)
and translates them into object files . Typical suffixes for that file type are .o or .obj.
After successful compilation the set of object files is processed by a linker. This program
combine the files, add necessary libraries and creates an executable. Under UNIX this file is
called a.out if not other specified. These steps are illustrated in Figure 9.1.
Figure 9.1: Compilation steps.

With modern compilers both steps can be combined. For example, our small example programs
can be compiled and linked with the GNU C++ compiler as follows (`èxample.cc'' is just an
example name, of course):
gcc example.cc
9.6.2 A Note about Style

Header files are used to describe the interface of implementation files. Consequently, they are included
in each implementation file which uses the interface of the particular implementation file. As mentioned
in previous sections this inclusion is achieved by a copy of the content of the header file at each
preprocessor #include statement, leading to a ``huge'' raw C++ file.
To avoid the inclusion of multiple copies caused by mutual dependencies we use conditional
coding. The preprocessor also defines conditional statements to check for various aspects of its
processing. For example, we can check if a macro is already defined:
#ifndef MACRO
#define MACRO /* define MACRO */
...
#endif
The lines between #ifndef and #endif are only included, if MACRO is not already defined. We
can use this mechanism to prevent multiple copies:
/*
** Example for a header file which `checks' if it is
** already included. Assume, the name of the header file
** is `myheader.h'
*/
#ifndef __MYHEADER_H
#define __MYHEADER_H
/*
** Interface declarations go here
*/
#endif /* __MYHEADER_H */
__MYHEADER_H is a unique name for each header file. You might want to follow the convention
of using the name of the file prefixed with two underbars. The first time the file is
included, __MYHEADER_H is not defined, thus every line is included and processed. The first line
just defines a macro called __MYHEADER_H. If accidentally the file should be included a second
time (while processing the same input file), __MYHEADER_H is defined, thus everything leading up
to the #endif is skipped.
9.7 Excercises
1.
Polymorphism. Explain why

void display(const DrawableObject obj);
does not produce the desired output.
10 The List - A Case Study
Peter Müller
10.1 Generic Types (Templates)

In C++ generic data types are called class templates or just templates for short. A class template
looks like a normal class definition, where some aspects are represented by placeholders. In the
forthcoming list example we use this mechanism to generate lists for various data types:
template <class T>
class List : ... {
public:
...
void append(const T data);
...
};
In the first line we introduce the keyword template which starts every template declaration. The
arguments of a template are enclosed in angle brackets.
Each argument specifies a placeholder in the following class definition. In our example, we want
class List to be defined for various data types. One could say, that we want to define a class of
lists . In this case the class of lists is defined by the type of objects they contain. We use the
name T for the placeholder. We now use T at any place where normally the type of the actual
objects are expected. For example, each list provides a method to append an element to it. We
can now define this method as shown above with use of T.
An actual list definition must now specify the type of the list. If we stick to the class expression
used before, we have to create a class instance. From this class instance we can then create
``real'' object instances:
List<int> integerList;
Here we create a class instance of a List which takes integers as its data elements. We specify the
type enclosed in angle brackets. The compiler now applies the provided argument `ìnt'' and
automatically generates a class definition where the placeholder T is replaced by int, for
example, it generates the following method declaration for append():
void append(const int data);
Templates can take more than one argument to provide more placeholders. For example, to
declare a dictionary class which provides access to its data elements by a key, one can think of
the following declaration:
template <class K, class T>

class Dictionary {
...
public:
...
K getKey(const T from);
T getData(const K key);
...
};
Here we use two placeholders to be able to use dictionaries for various key and data types.
Template arguments can also be used to generate parameterized class definitions. For example, a
stack might be implemented by an array of data elements. The size of the array could be
specified dynamically:
template <class T, int size>

class Stack {
T _store[size];
public:
...
};
Stack<int,128> mystack;
In this example, mystack is a stack of integers using an array of 128 elements. However, in the
following we will not use parameterized classes.
10.2 Shape and Traversal

In the following discussion we distinguish between a data structure's shape and its traversing
strategies. The first is the ``look'', which already provides plenty information about the building blocks of
the data structure.
A traversing strategy defines the order in which elements of the data structure are to be visited. It
makes sense to separate the shape from traversing strategies, because some data structures can be
traversed using various strategies.
Traversing of a data structure is implemented using iterators. Iterators guarantee to visit each
data item of their associated data structure in a well defined order. They must provide at least the
following properties:
1.
Current element. The iterator visits data elements one at a time. The element which is currently
visited is called ``current element''.
2.
Successor function. The execution of the step to the next data element depends on the
traversing strategy implemented by the iterator. The ``successor function'' is used to return the
element which is next to be visited: It returns the successor of the current element.
3.
Termination condition. The iterator must provide a mechanism to check whether all elements
are visited or not.
10.3 Properties of Singly Linked Lists

When doing something object-oriented, the first question to ask is
What are the basic building blocks of the item to implement?
Have a look at Figure 10.1, which shows a list consisting of four rectangles. Each rectangle has a
bullet in its middle, the first three point to their right neighbour. Since the last rectangle have no
right neighbour, there is no pointer.
Figure 10.1: Basic building blocks of a singly linked list.

First let's choose names for these building blocks. Talking of rectangles is not appropriate,
because one can think of a figure using circles or triangles.
Within the scope of graphs the name node is used. A node contains a pointer to its successor.
Thus, the list in the figure consists of nodes, each of which has exactly one pointer associated
with it.
Three types of nodes can be distinguished:
 The first node (head), which has no predecessor,

 the middle nodes, which have exactly one predecessor and exactly one successor and
 the last node (tail), which has no successor.
Note that the nodes do not carry any content. This is because the bare data structure list consists
only of nodes, which are strung together. Of course real applications need nodes, carrying some
content. But in the sense of object-orientation this is a specialization of the nodes.
From the figure we can see, that a list can only be used with one traversing strategy: forward
cursor. Initially, the head will be the first current element. The successor function simply follows
the pointer of the current node. The termination function checks the current element to be the
tail.
Note that it is not possible to go back nor to start in the middle of the list. The latter would
contradict the requirement, that each element must be visited.
The next question is, what are the operations offered by a list? A list only defines two well
known nodes head and tail. Let's have a deeper look to them.
A new node can be put-in-front of the list such that:
 its pointer is set to the current head,

 the new node becomes the new head.
Similarly, a new node can easily be appended to the tail:
 the tail pointer is set to the new node,

 the new node becomes the new tail.
The inverse function to put in front is delete-from-front:
 the successor node of the head becomes the new head,

 the formerly head node is discarded.
You should be able to figure out why there is no cheap inverse append function.
Finally, there exist three other cheap primitives, whose meaning is straight forward. Thus, we
will not examine them any further. However, we present them here for completeness:
 get-first: returns the (data of the) head node,

 get-last: returns the (data of the) tail node and
 is-empty: returns whether the list is empty or not.
10.4 Shape Implementation
10.4.1 Node Templates

The basic building block of a list is the node. Thus, let's first declare a class for it. A node has nothing
more than a pointer to another node. Let's assume, that this neighbour is always on the right side.
Have a look at the following declaration of class Node.
class Node {
Node *_right;
public:
Node(Node *right = NULL) : _right(right) {}
Node(const Node &val) : _right(val._right) {}
const Node *right() const { return _right; }

Node *&right() { return _right; }
Node &operator =(const Node &val) {

_right = val._right;
return *this;
}
const int operator ==(const Node &val) const {

return _right == val._right;
}
const int operator !=(const Node &val) const {
return !(*this == val);
}
};
A look to the first version of method right() contains a const just before the method body. When
used in this position, const declares the method to be constant regarding the elements of the
invoking object. Consequently, you are only allowed to use this mechanism in method
declarations or definitions, respectively.
This type of const modifier is also used to check for overloading. Thus,
class Foo {
...
int foo() const;
int foo();
};
declare two different methods. The former is used in constant contexts whereas the second is
used in variable contexts.
Although template class Node implements a simple node it seems to define plenty of
functionality. We do this, because it is good practice to offer at least the following functionality
for each defined data type:
 Copy Constructor. The copy constructor is needed to allow definition of objects which are
initialized from already existing ones.
 operator =. Each object should know how to assign other objects (of the same type) to itself. In
our example class, this is simply the pointer assignment.
 operator ==. Each object should know how to compare itself with another object.
The unequality operator ``!='' is implemented by using the definition of the equality operator.
Recall, that this points to the invoking object, thus,
Node a, b;
...
if (a != b) ...
would result in a call to operator !=() with this set to the address of a. We
dereference this using the standard dereference operator ``*''. Now, *this is an object of
class Node which is compared to another object using operator ==(). Consequently, the
definition of operator ==() of class Node is used. Using the standard boolean NOT operator ``!''
we negate the result and obtain the truth value of operator !=().
The above methods should be available for each class you define. This ensures that you can use
your objects as you would use any other objects, for example integers. If some of these methods
make no sense for whatever reason, you should declare them in a private section of the class to
explicitly mark them as not for public use. Otherwise the C++ compiler would substitute
standard operators.
Obviously, real applications require the nodes to carry data. As mentioned above, this means to
specialize the nodes. Data can be of any type, hence, we are using the template construct.
template <class T>

class DataNode : public Node {
T _data;
public:
DataNode(const T data, DataNode *right = NULL) :
Node(right), _data(data) {}
DataNode(const DataNode &val) :
Node(val), _data(val._data) {}
const DataNode *right() const {

return((DataNode *) Node::right());
}
DataNode *&right() { return((DataNode *&) Node::right()); }
const T &data() const { return _data; }

T &data() { return _data; }
DataNode &operator =(const DataNode &val) {

Node::operator =(val);
_data = val._data;
return *this;
}
const int operator ==(const DataNode &val) const {

return(
Node::operator ==(val) &&
_data == val._data);
}
const int operator !=(const DataNode &val) const {
}
};
The above template DataNode simply specializes class Node to carry data of any type. It adds
functionality to access its data element and also offers the same set of standard
functionality: Copy Constructor, operator =() and operator ==(). Note, how we reuse
functionality already defined by class Node.
10.4.2 List Templates

Now we are able to declare the list template. We also use the template mechanism here, because we
want the list to carry data of arbitrary type. For example, we want to be able to define a list of integers.
We start with an abstract class template ListBase which functions as the base class of all other lists. For
example, doubly linked lists obviously share the same properties like singly linked lists.
template <class T>
class ListBase {
public:
virtual ~ListBase() {} // Force destructor to be
// virtual
virtual void flush() = 0;
virtual void putInFront(const T data) = 0;

virtual void append(const T data) = 0;
virtual void delFromFront() = 0;
virtual const T &getFirst() const = 0;

virtual T &getFirst() = 0;
virtual const T &getLast() const = 0;
virtual T &getLast() = 0;
virtual const int isEmpty() const = 0;

};
What we actually do is to describe the interface of every list by specifying the prototypes of
required methods. We do that for every operation we have identified in section 10.3.
Additionally, we also include a method flush() which allows us to delete all elements of a list.
For operations get-first and get-last we have declared two versions. One is for use in a constant
context and the other in a variable context.
With this abstract class template we are able to actually define our list class template:
template <class T>

class List : public ListBase<T> {
DataNode<T> *_head, *_tail;
public:
List() : _head(NULL), _tail(NULL) {}
List(const List &val) : _head(NULL), _tail(NULL) {
*this = val;
}
virtual ~List() { flush(); }
virtual void flush();
virtual void putInFront(const T data);

virtual void append(const T data);
virtual void delFromFront();
virtual const T &getFirst() const { return _head->data(); }

virtual T &getFirst() { return _head->data(); }
virtual const T &getLast() const { return _tail->data(); }
virtual T &getLast() { return _tail->data(); }
virtual const int isEmpty() const { return _head == NULL; }
List &operator =(const List &val) {

flush();
DataNode<T> *walkp = val._head;
while (walkp) append(walkp->data());
return *this;
}
const int operator ==(const List &val) const {

if (isEmpty() && val.isEmpty()) return 1;
DataNode<T> *thisp = _head,
*valp = val._head;
while (thisp && valp) {
if (thisp->data() != valp->data()) return 0;
thisp = thisp->right();
valp = valp->right();
}
return 1;
}
const int operator !=(const List &val) const {
}
friend class ListIterator<T>;

};
The constructors initialize the list's elements _head and _tail to NULL which is the NUL pointer
in C and C++. You should know how to implement the other methods from your programming
experience. Here we only present the implementation of method putInFront():
template <class T> void

List<T>::putInFront(const T data) {
_head = new DataNode<T>(data, _head);
if (!_tail) _tail = _head;
} /* putInFront */
If we define methods of a class template outside of its declaration, we must also specify
the template keyword. Again we use the new operator to create a new data node dynamically.
This operator allows initialization of its created object with arguments enclosed in parenthesis. In
the above example, new creates a new instance of class DataNode T . Consequently, the
corresponding constructor is called.
Also notice how we use placeholder T. If we would create a class instance of class template List,
say, List int this would also cause creation of a class instance of class template DataNode,
viz DataNode int .
The last line of the class template declaration declares class template ListIterator to be a friend
of List. We want to separately define the list's iterator. However, it is closely related, thus, we
allow it to be a friend.
10.5 Iterator Implementation

In section 10.2 we have introduced the concept of iterators to traverse through a data structure.
Iterators must implement three properties:
 Current element.
 Successor function.
 Termination condition.
Generally speaking, the iterator successively returns data associated with the current element.
Obviously, there will be a method, say, current() which implements this functionality. The return
type of this method depends on the type of data stored in the particular data structure. For
example, when iterating over List int the return type should be int.
The successor function, say, succ(), uses additional information which is stored in structural
elements of the data structure. In our list example, these are the nodes which carry the data and a
pointer to their right neighbour. The type of the structural elements usually differs from that of
the raw data. Consider again our List int where succ() must use DataNode int as
structural elements.
The termination condition is implemented by a method, say, terminate(), which returns TRUE if
(and only if) all data elements of the associated data structure have been visited. As long
as succ() can find an element not yet visited, this method returns FALSE.
Again we want to specify an abstract iterator class which defines properties of every iterator. The
thoughts above lead to the following declaration:
template <class Data, class Element>

class Iterator {
protected:
Element _start,
_current;
public:
Iterator(const Element start) :
_start(start), _current(start) {}
Iterator(const Iterator &val) :
_start(val._start), _current(val._current) {}
virtual ~Iterator() {}
virtual const Data current() const = 0;

virtual void succ() = 0;
virtual const int terminate() const = 0;
virtual void rewind() { _current = _start; }
Iterator &operator =(const Iterator &val) {

_start = val._start;
_current = val._current;
return *this;
}
const int operator ==(const Iterator &val) const {

return(_start == val._start && _current == val._current);
}
const int operator !=(const Iterator &val) const {
}
};
Again we use the template mechanism to allow the use of the iterator for any data structure
which stores data of type Data and which uses structural elements of type Element. Each iterator
``knows'' a starting (structural) element and the current element. We make both accessible from
derived classes because derived iterators need access to them to implement the following iterator
properties. You should already understand how the constructors operate and why we force the
destructor to be virtual.
Subsequently we specify three methods which should implement the three properties of an
iterator. We also add a method rewind() which simply sets the current element to the start
element. However, complex data structures (for example hash tables) might require more
sophisticated rewind algorithms. For that reason we also specify this method to be virtual,
allowing derived iterators to redefine it for their associated data structure.
The last step in the iterator implementation process is the declaration of the list iterator. This
iterator is highly related to our class template List, for example, it is clear that the structural
elements are class templates DataNode. The only `òpen'' type is the one for the data. Once
again, we use the template mechanism to provide list iterators for the different list types:
template <class T>

class ListIterator : public Iterator<T, DataNode<T> *> {
public:
ListIterator(const List<T> &list) :
Iterator<T, DataNode<T> *>(list._head) {}
ListIterator(const ListIterator &val) :
Iterator<T, DataNode<T> *>(val) {}
virtual const T current() const { return _current->data(); }

virtual void succ() { _current = _current->right(); }
virtual const int terminate() const {
return _current == NULL;
}
T &operator ++(int) {
T &tmp = _current->data();
succ();
return tmp;
}
ListIterator &operator =(const ListIterator &val) {

Iterator<T, DataNode<T> *>::operator =(val);
return *this;
}
};
The class template ListIterator is derived from Iterator. The type of data is, of course, the type
for which the list iterator is declared, hence, we insert placeholder T for the iterator's data
type Data. The iteration process is achieved with help of the structural elements of
type DataNode. Obviously the starting element is the head of the list _head which is of
type DataNode T *. We choose this type for the element type Element.
Note that the list iterator actually hides the details about the structural elements. This type highly
depends on the implementation of the list. For example, if we would have chosen an array
implementation, we may have used integers as structural elements where the current element is
indicated by an array index.
The first constructor takes the list to traverse as its argument and initializes its iterator portion
accordingly. As each ListIterator T is a friend of List T it has access to the list's private
members. We use this to initialize the iterator to point to the head of the list.
We omit the destructor because we do not have any additional data members for the list iterator.
Consequently, we do nothing special for it. However, the destructor of class template Iterator is
called. Recall that we have to define this destructor to force derived classes to also have a virtual
one.
The next methods just define the required three properties. Now that we have structural elements
defined as DataNode T * we use them as follows:
 the current element is the data carried by the current structural element,
 the successor function is to set the current structural element to its right neighbour and
 the termination condition is to check the current structural element if it is the NULL pointer.
Note that this can happen only in two cases:
1.
The list is empty. In this case the current element is already NULL because the list's
head _head is NULL.
2.
The current element reached the last element. In this case the previous successor function call
set the current element to the right neighbour of the last element which is NULL.
We have also included an overloaded postincrement operator ``++''. To distinguish this operator
from the preincrement operator, it takes an additional (anonymous) integer argument. As we only
use this argument to declare a correct operator prototype and because we do not use the value of
the argument, we omit the name of the argument.
The last method is the overloaded assignment operator for list iterators. Similar to previous
assignment operators, we just reuse already defined assignments of superclasses; Iterator T
::operator =() in this case.
The other methods and operators, namely rewind(), operator ==() and operator !=() are all
inherited from class template Iterator.
10.6 Example Usage

The list template as introduced in previous sections can be used as follows:
int
main() {
List<int> list;
int ix;
for (ix = 0; ix < 10; ix++) list.append(ix);

ListIterator<int> iter(list);
while (!iter.terminate()) {
printf("%d ", iter.current());
iter.succ();
}
puts("");
return 0;
}
As we have defined a postincrement operator for the list iterator, the loop can also be written as:
while (!iter.terminate())
print("%d ", iter++);
10.7 Discussion
10.7.1 Separation of Shape and Access Strategies

The presented example focusses on an object-oriented view. In real applications singly linked
lists might offer more functionality. For example, insertion of new data items should be no
problem due to the use of pointers:
1.
Take the successor pointer of the new element and set it to the element which should become
its right neighbour,
2.
Take the successor pointer of the element after which the new element should be inserted and
set it to the new element.
Two simple operations. However, the problem is to designate the element after which the new
element should be inserted. Again, a mechanism is needed which traverse through the list. This
time, however, traversion stops at a particular element: It is the element where the list (or the
data structure) is modified.
Similar to the existence of different traversing strategies, one can think of different modification
strategies. For example, to create a sorted list, where elements are sorted in ascending order, use
an ascending modifier.
These modifiers must have access to the list structural elements, and thus, they would be
declared as friends as well. This would lead to the necessity that every modifier must be a friend
of its data structure. But who can guarantee, that no modifier is forgotten?
A solution is, that modification strategies are not implemented by `èxternal'' classes as iterators
are. Instead, they are implemented by inheritance. If a sorted list is needed, it is a specialization
of the general list. This sorted list would add a method, say insert(), which inserts a new element
according to the modification strategy.
To make this possible, the presented list template must be changed. Because now, derived
classes must have access to the head and tail node to implement these strategies.
Consequently, _head and _tail should be protected.
10.7.2 Iterators
The presented iterator implementation assumes, that the data structure is not changed during the
use of an iterator. Consider the following example to illustrate this:
List<int> ilist;
int ix;
for (ix = 1; ix < 10; ix++)

ilist.append(ix);
ListIterator<int> iter(ilist);
iter.succ();
}
printf("\n");
ilist.putInFront(0);
iter.rewind();
iter.succ();
}
printf("\n");
This code fragment prints
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
instead of
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
This is due to the fact, that our list iterator only stores pointers to the list structural elements.
Thus, the start element _start is initially set to point to the location where the list's head
node _head points to. This simply leads to two different pointers referencing the same location.
Consequently, when changing one pointer as it is done by invoking putInFront() the other
pointer is not affected.
For that reason, when rewinding the iterator after putInFront() the current element is set to the
start element which was set at the time the iterator constructor was called. Now, the start element
actually references the second element of the list.
10.8 Exercises
1.
Similar to the definition of the postincrement operator in class template ListIterator, one could
define a preincrement operator as:
T &operator ++() {
succ();
return _current->data();
}
What problems occur?
2.
Add the following method

int remove(const T &data);
to class template List. The method should delete the first occurrence of data in the list. The
method should return 1 if it removed an element or 0 (zero) otherwise.
What functionality must data provide? Remember that it can be of any type, especially
user defined classes!
3.
Derive a class template CountedList from List which counts its elements. Add a
method count() of arbitrary type which returns the actual number of elements stored in the list.
Try to reuse as much of List as possible.
4.
Regarding the iterator problem discussed in section 10.7. What are possible solutions to allow
the list to be altered while an iterator of it is in use?
References
1
Borland International, Inc.
Programmer's Guide.
Borland International, Inc., 1993.
Ute Claussen.
Objektorientiertes Programmieren.
Springer Verlag, 1993.
ISBN 3-540-55748-2.
William Ford and William Topp.

Data Structures with C++.
Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1996.
ISBN 0-02-420971-6.
Brian W. Kernighan and Dennis M. Ritchie.

The C Programming Language.
Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1977.
Dennis M. Ritchie.
The Development of the C Language .
In Second History of Programming Languages conference, Cambridge, Mass., Apr. 1993.
Bjarne Stroustrup.
The C++ Programming Language.
Addison-Wesley, 2nd edition, 1991.
ISBN 0-201-53992-6.
A Solutions to the Exercises

This section presents example solutions to the exercises of the previous lectures.
A.1 A Survey of Programming Techniques

1.
Discussion of module Singly-Linked-List-2.
(a)
Interface definition of module Integer-List

MODULE Integer-List
DECLARE TYPE int_list_handle_t;
int_list_handle_t int_list_create();
BOOL int_list_append(int_list_handle_t this,
int data);
INTEGER int_list_getFirst(int_list_handle_t this);
INTEGER int_list_getNext(int_list_handle_t this);
BOOL int_list_isEmpty(int_list_handle_t this);
END Integer-List;
This representation introduces additional problems which are caused by not separating
traversal from data structure. As you may recall, to iterate over the elements of the list,
we have used a loop statement with the following condition:
WHILE data IS VALID DO
Data was initialized by a call to list_getFirst(). The integer list

procedure int_list_getFirst() returns an integer, consequently, there is no such thing like
an `ìnvalid integer'' which we could use for loop termination checking.
2.
Differences between object-oriented programming and other techniques. In object-oriented

programming objects exchange messages with each other. In the other programming
techniques, data is exchanged between procedures under control of a main program. Objects of
the same kind but each with its own state can coexist. This contrasts the modular approach
where each module only has one global state.
A.2 Abstract Data Types

1.
ADT Integer.
(a)
Both operations add and sub can be applied for whatever value is hold by N. Thus, these
operations can be applied at any time: There is no restriction to their use. However, you can
describe this with a precondition which equals true.
(b)
We define three new operations as requested: mul, div and abs. The latter should return the
absolute value of the integer. The operations are defined as follows:
mul(k)
div(k)
abs()
The operation mul does not require any precondition. That's similar to add and sub. The
postcondition is of course res = N*k. The next operation div requires k to be not 0 (zero).
Consequently, we define the following precondition: k not equal 0. The last
operation abs returns the value of N if N is positive or 0 or -N if N is negative. Again it
does not matter what value N has when this operation is applied. Here is its
postcondition:
if N >= 0 then
abs = N
else
abs = -N
2.
ADT Fraction.
(a)
A simple fraction consists of numerator and denominator. Both are integer numbers. This is
similar to the complex number example presented in the section. We could choose at least two
data structures to hold the values: an array or a record.
(b)
Interface layout. Remember that the interface is just the set of operations viewable to the
outside world. We could describe an interface of a fraction in a verbal manner. Consequently,
we need operations:
 to get the value of nominator/denominator,

 to set the value of nominator/denominator,
 to add a fraction returning the sum,
 to subtract a fraction returning the difference,
 ...
(c)
Here are some axioms and preconditions for each fraction which also hold for the ADT:
 The denominator must not equal 0 (zero), otherwise the value of the fraction is not
defined.
 If the nominator is 0 (zero) the value of the fraction is 0 for any value of the
denominator.
 Each whole number can be represented by a fraction of which the nominator is the
number and the denominator is 1.
3.
ADTs define properties of a set of instances. They provide an abstract view to these properties
by providing a set of operations which can be applied on the instances. It is this set of
operations, the interface, which defines properties of the instances. The use of an ADT is
restricted by axioms and preconditions. Both define conditions and properties of an
environment in which instances of the ADT can be used.
4.
We need to state axioms and to define preconditions to ensure the correct use of instances of
ADTs. For example, if we do not declare 0 to be the neutral element of the addition of integers,
there could be an ADT Integer which do something weird when adding 0 to N. This is not what is
expected from an integer. Thus, axioms and preconditions provide a means to ensure that ADTs
``function'' as we wish them to.
5.
Description of relationships.
(a)
An instance is an actual representative of an ADT. It is thus an `èxample'' of it. Where the ADT
declare to use a ``signed whole number'' as its data structure, an instance actually holds a value,
say, ``-5''.
(b)
Generic ADTs define the same properties of their corresponding ADT. However, they are
dedicated to another particular type. For example, the ADT List defines properties of lists. Thus,
we might have an operation append(elem) which appends a new element elem to the list. We
do not say of what type elem actually is, just that it will be the last element of the list after this
operation. If we now use a generic ADT List the type of this element is known: it's provided by
the generic parameter.
(c)
Instances of the same generic ADT could be viewed as ``siblings''. They would be ``cousins'' of
instances of another generic ADT if both generic ADTs share the same ADT.
A.3 Object-Oriented Concepts

1.
Class.
(a)
A class is the actual implementation of an ADT. For example, an ADT for integers might include
an operation set to set the value of its instance. This operation is implemented differently in
languages such as C or Pascal. In C the equal sign ``='' defines the set operation for integers,
whereas in Pascal the character string ``:='' is used. Consequently, classes implement operations
by providing methods. Similarly, the data structure of the ADT is implemented by attributes of
the class.
(b)
Class Complex
class Complex {
attributes:
Real real,
imaginary
methods:
:=(Complex c) /* Set value to the one of c */
Real realPart()
Real imaginaryPart()
Complex +(Complex c)
Complex -(Complex c)
Complex /(Complex c)
Complex *(Complex c)
}
We choose the well-known operator symbols ``+'' for addition, ``-'' for subtraction, ``/''
for division and ``*'' for multiplication to implement the corresponding operations of the
ADT Complex. Thus, objects of class Complex can be used like:
Complex c1, c2, c3

c3 := c1 + c2
You may notice, that we could write the addition statement as follows:
c3 := c1.+(c2)
You may want to replace the ``+'' with `àdd'' to come to a representation which we have
used so far. However, you should be able to understand that ``+'' is nothing more than a
different name for `àdd''.
2.
Interacting objects.
3.
Object view.
4.
Messages.
(a)
Objects are autonomous entities which only provide a well-defined interface. We'd like to talk of
objects as if they are active entities. For example, objects `àre responsible'' for themselves,
``they'' might deny invocation of a method, etc.. This distinguishes an object from a module,
which is passive. Therefore, we don't speak of procedure calls. We speak of messages with
which we `àsk'' an object to invoke one of its methods.
(b)
The Internet provides several objects. Two of the most well known ones are ``client'' and
``server''. For example, you use an FTP client (object) to access data stored on an FTP server
(object). Thus, you could view this as if the client ``sends a message'' to the server asking for
providing data stored there.
(c)
In the client/server environment we really have two remotely acting entities: the client and
server process. Typically, these two entities exchange data in form of Internet messages.
A.4 More Object-Oriented Concepts

1.
Inheritance.
(a)
Definition of class Rectangle:

class Rectangle inherits from Point {
attributes:
int _width, // Width of rectangle
_height // Height of rectangle
methods:
setWidth(int newWidth)
getWidth()
setHeight(int newHeight)
getHeight()
}
In this example, we define a rectangle by its upper left corner (coordinates as inherited
from Point) and its dimension. Alternatively, we could have defined it by its upper left
and lower right corner.
We add access methods for the rectangle's width and height.
(b)
3D objects. A sphere is defined by a center in 3D space and a radius. The center is a point in 3D
space, thus, we can define class Sphere as:
class Sphere inherits from 3D-Point {
attributes:
int _radius;
methods:
setRadius(int newRadius)
getRadius()
}
This is similar to the circle class for 2D space. Now, 3D-Point is just a Point with an
additional dimension:
class 3D-Point inherits from Point {

attributes:
int _z;
methods:
setZ(int newZ);
getZ();
}
Consequently, 3D-Point and Point are related with a is-a relationship.
(c)
Functionality of move(). move() as defined in the section allows 3D objects to move on the X-
axis, thus only in one dimension. It does this, by modifying only the 2D part of 3D objects. This
2D part is defined by the Point class inherited directly or indirectly by 3D objects.
(d)
Inheritance graph (see Figure A.1).
Figure A.1: Inheritance graph of some drawable objects.

(e)
Alternative inheritance graph. In this example, class Sphere inherits from Circle and simply adds
a third coordinate. This has the advantage that a sphere can be handled like a circle (for
example, its radius can easily be modified by methods/functions which handle circles). It has the
disadvantage, that it ``distributes'' the object's handle (the center point in 3D space) over the
inheritance hierarchy: from Point over Circle to Sphere. Thus, this handle is not accessible as a
whole.
2.
Multiple inheritance. The inheritance graph in Figure 5.9 obviously introduces naming conflicts
by properties of class A.
However, these properties are uniquely identified by following the path from D up to A.
Thus, D can change properties of A inherited by B by following the inheritance path
through B. Similarly, D can change properties of A inheritied by C by following the
inheritance path through C. Consequently, this naming conflict does not necessarily lead
to an error, as long as the paths are designated.
A.5 More on C++

1.
Polymorphism. When using the signature

void display(const DrawableObject obj);
First note, that in C++ function or method parameters are passed by value.
Consequently, obj would be a copy of the actual provided function call argument. This means,
that DrawableObject must be a class from which objects can be created. This is not the case,
if DrawableObject is an abstract class (as it is when print() is defined as pure method.)
If there exists a virtual method print() which is defined by class DrawableObject, then
(as obj is only a copy of the actual argument) this method is invoked. It is not the method
defined by the class of the actual argument (because it does no longer play any significant
role!)
A.6 The List - A Case Study

1.
Preincrement operator for iterators. The preincrement operator as defined in the exercise does
not check for validity of _current. As succ() might set its value to NULL this may cause access to
this NULL-pointer and, hence, might crash the program. A possible solution might be to define
the operator as:
T &operator ++() {
succ();
return(_current ? _current->data() : (T) 0);
}
However, this does not function as we now assume something about T. It must be possible to
cast it to a kind of ,,NULL`` value.
2.
Addition of remove method. We don't give the code solution. Instead we give the algorithm. The
method remove() must iterate over the list until it reaches an element with the requested data
item. It then deletes this element and returns 1. If the list is empty or if the data item could not
be found, it return 0 (zero).
During the iteration, remove() must compare the provided data item successively with
those in the list. Consequently, there might exist a comparison like:
if (data == current->data()) {
// found the item
}
Here we use the equation operator ,,==`` to compare both data items. As these items can
be of any type, they especially can be objects of user defined classes. The question is:
How is ,,equality`` defined for those new types? Consequently, to allow remove() to work
properly, the list should only be used for types which define the comparison operator
(namely, ,,==`` and ,,!=``) properly. Otherwise, default comparisons are used, which
might lead to strange results.
3.
Class CountedList. A counted list is a list, which keeps track of the number of elements in it.
Thus, when a data item is added, the number is incremented by one, when an item is deleted it
is decremented by one. Again, we do not give the complete implementation, we rather show
one method (append()) and how it is altered:
class CountedList : public List {
int _count; // The number of elements
...
public:
...
virtual void append(const T data) {
_count++; // Increment it and ...
List::append(data); // ... use list append
}
...
}
Not every method can be implemented this way. In some methods, one must check
whether _count needs to be altered or not. However, the main idea is, that each list
method is just expanded (or specialized) for the counted list.
4.
Iterator problem. To solve the iterator problem one could think of a solution, where the iterator
stores a reference to its corresponding list. At iterator creation time, this reference is then
initialized to reference the provided list. The iterator methods must then be modified to use this
reference instead of the pointer _start.
About this document ...

Introduction to
Object-Oriented Programming
Using C++
This document was generated using the LaTeX2HTML translator Version 97.1 (release) (July
13th, 1997)
Copyright © 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, Nikos Drakos, Computer Based Learning Unit,
University of Leeds.
The command line arguments were:

latex2html -html_version 3.0 -split +0 -show_section_numbers -no_navigation -t
Introduction to Object-Oriented Programming -antialias -toc_stars -
local_icons -dir huge tutorial.tex.
The translation was initiated by P. Mueller on 9/4/1997
Footnotes
...calls
We don't regard parallelism here.
...it
Not all real languages provide such a type. In C this can be emulated with pointers.
...language
You might ask, why we should declare an Integer class if there is already an integer type
available. We come back to this when we talk about inheritance.
...[2]
This book is only available in German. However, since this is one of the best books about object-
oriented programming I know of, I decided to cite it here.
...point
We use lowercase letters when we talk at the object level.

...characters
Don't argue whether such a method makes really sense or not. It is just introduced for
illustrating purposes.
...parenthesis
This is due to a historical `àccident'' while developing C [5].
...object
In the following we will drop the word `òbject'' and will speak of ``the point''.
...languages
This is due to the fact that C++ supports function polymorphism. Therefore the name
mangling must take function parameters into account.
...files)
This also creates an intermediary preprocessed raw C++ file. A typical suffix is .i.
...files
This has nothing to do with objects in the object-oriented sense.
...libraries
For example, standard functions such as printf() are provided this way.
...templates
C++ also allows the definition of function templates. However, as we do not use them, we will
not explain them any further.
...lists
Do not mix up this use of ``class'' with the ``class definition'' used before. Here we
mean with ``class'' a set of class definitions which share some common properties, or
a ``class of classes''.

Introduction To Object-Oriented Programming Using C++: Peter Müller

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Introduction To Object-Oriented Programming Using C++: Peter Müller

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Introduction to

Globewide Network Academy (GNA)

The tutorial is organized as follows. Chapter 2 presents a brief overview of procedural

2 A Survey of Programming Techniques

2.1 Unstructured Programming

2.2 Procedural Programming

2.4 An Example with Data Structures

2.4.1 Handling Single Lists

data <- list_getFirst();

2.4.2 Handling Multiple Lists

DECLARE TYPE list_handle_t;

2.5 Modular Programming Problems

2.5.1 Explicit Creation and Destruction

PROCEDURE foo() BEGIN

/* Do something with myList */

/* Do something with the myList */

2.5.2 Decoupled Data and Operations

2.5.3 Missing Type Safety

myList <- list_create();

list_handle_t<Apple> list1; /* a list of apples */

2.5.4 Strategies and Representation

2.6 Object-Oriented Programming

In contrast to that, in object-oriented programming we would have as many list objects as

What are possible solutions to these problems?

3 Abstract Data Types

3.1 Handling Problems

Figure 3.1: Create a model from a problem with abstraction.

 the data which are affected and

As an example consider the administration of employees in an institution. The head of the

3.2 Properties of Abstract Data Types

Figure 3.2: An abstract data type (ADT).

Let's try to put the characteristics of an ADT in a more formal way:

It exports a set of operations. This set is called interface.

Axioms and preconditions define the application domain of the type.

 ``An empty list is a list.''

This additional information could be specified by a generic parameter which is specified at

Creates a new integer.

Set N to k. The postcondition for this operation is N = k.

3.5 Abstract Data Types and Object-Orientation

Why are there no preconditions for operations add and sub?

Design an ADT Fraction which describes properties of fractions.

What data structures can be used? What are its elements?

What does the interface look like?

Name a few axioms and preconditions.

Describe in your own words properties of abstract data types.

Describe in your own words the relationship between

 instance and abstract data type,

int i, j, k; /* Define three integers */

The next line

{ Precondition: i = n where n is any Integer }

In either case, the ADT operation set is implemented.

{ Precondition: Let i = n1 and j = n2 with n1, n2 particular Integers }

{ Precondition: Let k = n where n is any Integer }

Definition (Class) A class is the implementation of an abstract data type (ADT). It

Definition (Object) An object is an instance of a class. It can be uniquely identified by

Sending a message asking an object to apply a method is similar to a procedure call in

Definition (Message) A message is a request to an object to invoke one of its methods. A

 the name of the method and

Consequently, invocation of a method is just a reaction caused by receipt of a message. This is

Definition (Method) A method is associated with a class. An object invokes a method as a

Figure 4.1: A program consisting of four objects.

wait, until a key is pressed.

get key value