Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DPP Newsletter Oct2006
DPP Newsletter Oct2006
DPP Newsletter Oct2006
XDPP CELEBRATES 20
TH
XTHE RISE OF
DEMOCRACY : A FORCE
FOR ENDURING GLOBAL
PEACE........................4
democracy
&
The Democratic Progressive Party celebrated its 20th anniversary with three days of events in Taipei and in
Kaohsiung. Gathered at an evening rally were President Chen Shui-bian, Vice President Lu Hsiu-lian,
Premier Su Tseng-chang, Kaohsiung Mayoral Election Candidate Chen Chu, Taipei Mayoral Election
Candidate Frank Hsieh and DPP Chairman Yu Shyi-kun.
2 DEMOCRACY & PROGRESS
DEMOCRACY &
PROGRESS
Department of International
Affairs
Democratic Progressive Party
8F, No. 30, Pei-Ping East Rd.
Taipei, Taiwan
t. 886-2-23929989 ext. 305
f. 886-2-23214527
e-mail: foreign@dpp.org.tw
web: http://www.dpp.org.tw
Director
Winston Dang
Editor-in-Chief:
Michael Fonte
Editor:
Ping-Ya Hsu
Whether China’s peaceful rise will be an opportunity or a threat has been a topic of heated debate in
international politics. In 2003, China raised the “peaceful rise” concept, which successfully incited discussions
and visions of a peaceful China. China wanted to tell the world that its rise is not a threat, but a great
opportunity.
Nevertheless, this concept contradicts lessons from history. History teaches us that chanting peace will
not actually bring peace itself. A “peaceful rise” can only be a slogan or a viewpoint, but cannot bring the
actual realization of peace. In today’s world, in order to have actual peace, democracy must stand as the
foundation. Therefore, a democratic rise is the biggest assurance of peace. China must have a rise of
democracy in order to become a responsible stakeholder.
Past international experiences show us that a burgeoning power, unless it is a democratic country, must
inevitably change the rules of the actual game. During the early part of the 20th century, the United States,
Germany and Japan were considered rising powers at that time. Subsequently, we saw that in Germany and
Japan, ideas of Nazism and militarism emerged, yet the United States played a model role in stabilizing the
world, mainly because of democracy.
The only way China will ever become a responsible stakeholder in the world is by rising democratically.
Otherwise, “peaceful rise” is only a pretty slogan. In their day, the ideas of Nazism and militarism involved
traits such as strong feelings of nationalism, fanatical desire for establishing national socialism, agitation of the
masses for power politics, denying of individualism, extreme fervor and celebration, and infatuated worship of
figureheads. All these traits resemble those seen in today’s China. A China that rises without democracy,
where its people live under one-party totalitarian control, is very likely to bring a threat of war and conflict.
Presently, the biggest difference between the ruling party and the opposition parties when it comes to
national policy concerns the sovereignty issue and China. The DPP believes that Taiwan is a sovereign and
independent country and the KMT believes that Taiwan is a part of China. The DPP prioritizes democracy
while the KMT emphasizes Chinese nationalism. When it comes to Taiwan’s future, the DPP bases it on
Western expectations, standing on the side of Western democratic countries. Meanwhile, the KMT completely
bases Taiwan’s future on China’s expectations. The DPP positions its China policy within the larger context of
Asia-Pacific strategy. The KMT positions its foreign policy for Taiwan within the context of its own China
policy. This is the main reason why the DPP supports the strengthening of US-Japan alliance, while the KMT
chooses to keep the U.S. and China equidistant.
Earlier this year, KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou came up with “Five No’s and Five Do’s”. In brief, his
standpoint makes no mention of national sovereignty, much less democratic values, and tries its best to please
China for supposedly preserving cross strait stability. I personally consider his standpoint as a “temporary
band-aid for trouble” because if we do not actively advance China’s democratization, cross strait stability is
unlikely to happen and conflict can be anticipated.
If the KMT were to win in 2008, I forecast confidently that the KMT leader will most likely adopt a
policy of equilibrium between the U.S. and China, thus weakening Taiwan-Japan relations. Not only will there
be a tilt towards China, but democracy in Taiwan will experience the same as in Hong Kong where the
democratic forces have suffered.
I believe that this kind of Chinese influence can be countermanded by a US established “Democratic
Alliance.”
Taiwan stands at the front line of conflict between maritime democracies and continental non-
democracies. China’s suppression of Taiwan affects all democratic forces. If Taiwan takes a pro-China
approach, not only does the power-balance in the region face a great challenge but also the security and
development of all democratic forces are affected.
Faced with China’s 800 missiles pointed at us, and the growing imbalance of military forces across the
Strait in China’s favor, Taiwan must strengthen its defenses, raise its defense budget, prepare better self-
defense weapons, and fortify our determination to preserve our democracy and sovereignty. However, with our
democratic values firmly in place, we must strive by whatever means possible to press forward China’s
democratization because only if China democratizes will it become a responsible stakeholder, will there be
peace in Asia and the world, will democratic Taiwan be secure.