Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Certificate Level: Tute 07 - Corporate Social Responsibility 2
Certificate Level: Tute 07 - Corporate Social Responsibility 2
Certificate Level: Tute 07 - Corporate Social Responsibility 2
Code BA4/BK/09
Carroll’s CSR Pyramid
Carroll’s CSR pyramid is a framework that explains how and why organisations should take
social responsibility. The pyramid was developed by Archie Carroll and highlights the four
most important types of responsibility of organisations. These are:
• Economic responsibility
• Legal responsibility
• Ethical responsibility
• Philanthropic responsibility
The pyramid’s base is profit. This foundation is necessary for a company to meet all laws and
regulations, as well as the demands of shareholders. Before a company can and should then
take its philanthropic responsibility or discretionary responsibility, it must also meet its ethical
responsibilities.
The economic responsibility of companies is about producing goods and services that society
needs and to make a profit on them. Companies have shareholders who expect and demand
a reasonable return on their investments, they have employees who want to do their jobs
safely and fairly, and have customers that want quality products for fair prices. That’s the
foundation of the pyramid upon which all the other layers rest.
The legal responsibility of companies is about complying with the minimum rules that have
been set. Organisations are expected to operate and function within those rules. The basic
rules consist of laws and regulations that represent society’s views of codified ethics. They
determine how organisations can conduct their business practices in a fair manner, as defined
by legislators on national, regional, and local level.
Given below are situations where the company will be demonstrating lack of legal
responsibility.
1. Anti – Competitive behavior focusing on maximizing market share and profits
2. Chagrining unnecessarily higher prices when the law stipulates a maximum price
3. Price fixing by collusion (Where competitors get together and fix a price)
When following legal responsibilities some economic responsibilities may become limited.
The difference between legal and ethical expectations can be difficult to determine.
Obviously, laws are based on ethical premises, but ethics goes beyond that.
Philanthropic responsibility
Philanthropic responsibilities are what is desired from the organisation although there is no
expectation nor a legal requirement for the organisaiton to do it. The word philanthropic is
derived from the Greek “Love of Society”, there is no obligation to do Philanthropic activities
however and organisation may decide it is the correct thing to do.
Example :
Reaction
The corporation denies any responsibility for social issues.
Defence
The corporation admits responsibility but fights it, doing the very least that seems to
be required.
Accommodation
The corporation accepts responsibility and does what is demanded of it by relevant
groups.
Proaction
The corporation seeks to go beyond industry norms.
H operates a successful bakery. He has recently started recycling all waste generated by his
store in response to government legislation. At the request of a local charity, he has also
started donating any leftover food at the end of each day to a shelter for the homeless.
According to Carroll, which ONE of the following philosophies best describes H's actions?
A. Accommodation
B. Reaction
C. Proaction
D. Defence
Identify Stakeholders
Classify Stakeholders
The senior members of the board must show their commitment to CSR.
Without top management’s support nothing will work. A clear vision must come
from the top linked to mission, vision and values of the organization. CSR should
be a core business activity similar to Marketing or HR.
Example : ODEL CSR projects on Dogs help support Embark brand’s business
objectives
3. Align CSR strategy with the Firm’s core competencies
CSR strategy must align with what we do best (Core Competencies) otherwise
CSR does not make business sense.
Example : Ford Motor Company supporting breast cancer as a CSR project does
not make any business sense, It would have been much better if they have
donated money to research on alternative fuel.
4. Integrate CSR into the culture, governance and strategy development of the
company
*This is given as an additional reading, this will not be explained in Videos. It is advised
that you read through these CIMA findings to get a full understanding of the concept.
1. Strong ethical policies that go beyond upholding the law can add great value to
a brand, whereas a failure to do the right thing can cause social, economic and
environmental damage, undermining a company’s long-term prospects in the
process.
2. Once they have adopted an ethical approach, companies will often find there
are bottom line benefits from demonstrating high ethical standards.
• Business’s main purpose is to maximize wealth and maximizing wealth itself can
be a form of social responsibility (Eg – Higher Taxes to the government which
can be used for a worthy cause, If shares owned by pension funds then gains
will go to persons who are at a disadvantage)
• Increased cost of ethical sourcing
• Having to turn away unethical business
• Consumption of management time.