Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Geothechnical Engineering Practice Problems
Geothechnical Engineering Practice Problems
Geothechnical Engineering Practice Problems
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Read carefully the instructions.
2. All answers MUST be written in your test booklet. Answer honestly. Write legibly.
3. In problem solving, show the complete solution and box the final answer.
4. Use black or blue ballpen only. Avoid using pencil.
a. 2.72 c. 2.68
b. 2.65 d.
2.74
CO2 8. The dry unit weight of a soil is 17.1 KN/m3 and its minimum void ratio is 0.52. Use 𝛿𝑊 =
9.81 𝐾𝑁/𝑚3. Calculate the buoyant unit weight soil.
a. 11.25 KN/m3 c. 10.87 KN/m3
b. 10.65 KN/m3 d. 10.24 KN/m3
CO2 9. The dry unit weight of a soil is 17.1 KN/m3 and its minimum void ratio is 0.52. Use 𝛿𝑊 =
9.81 𝐾𝑁/𝑚3.What is the shrinkage limit of the soil?
a. 18.57% c. 19.63%
b. 19.11% d. 21.45%
CO1 10. The field compaction of an earthwork was checked by an inspection engineer. In the
laboratory test, the soil gives a maximum dry density of 1.521 gram/cc at optimum
Prepared By/ Date (Faculty Member) Reviewed By/ Date (Program Chair)
Page 1 of 5
ENGR. KRISTINE R. CERVANCIA / 03-19-2021 ENGR. HERMIE M. DEL PILAR / 03-19-2021
moisture content of 14.8%. Construction specifications requires that the soil compacted
dry density must be at least 95% of the maximum dry density obtained from laboratory
within ±0.2% of optimum moisture content.
The following data were obtained in the field using the sand cone test:
Volume of soil excavated = 1245 cm3
Weight of soil excavated = 2260 grams
Dry weight of soil = 1810 grams
The following data were obtained in the field using the sand cone test:
Volume of soil excavated = 1245 cm3
Weight of soil excavated = 2260 grams
Dry weight of soil = 1810 grams
The following data were obtained in the field using the sand cone test:
Volume of soil excavated = 1245 cm3
Weight of soil excavated = 2260 grams
Dry weight of soil = 1810 grams
Determine the relative compaction of the soil and whether it is adequate or not.
a. 95.58, not adequate c. 95.18, not adequate
b. 95.18, adequate d. 95.58, adequate
CO1 13. The result of field unit weight determination of a soil sample using the sand cone
method is as follows:
In a laboratory, this soil yields a dry density of 1.385 g/cc at optimum moisture content
of 20.5%. Specification requires that the compacted unit weight of the soil to be at least
95% ± 0.2% of the of the maximum laboratory value.
In a laboratory, this soil yields a dry density of 1.385 g/cc at optimum moisture content
of 20.5%. Specification requires that the compacted unit weight of the soil to be at least
95% ± 0.2% of the of the maximum laboratory value.
In a laboratory, this soil yields a dry density of 1.385 g/cc at optimum moisture content
of 20.5%. Specification requires that the compacted unit weight of the soil to be at least
95% ± 0.2% of the of the maximum laboratory value.
What is the relative compaction of the soil, and did it comply with the specification?
a. 95.24%, Yes c. 94.24%, No
b. 94.86%, Yes d. 94.86%, No
CO1 16. Given the laboratory results of the Atterburg Limits Test in Figure 004. Plot the water
content versus the number of blows.
FIGURE 004
A. Liquid Limit
Test Number → 1 2 3 4
Number of Blows 35.00 28.00 20.00 15.00
Weight of Wet Soil + Container, g 91.57 108.16 119.14 114.94
Weight of Dry Soil + Container, g 73.78 85.04 89.56 84.10
Weight of Container, g 21.45 22.56 20.78 19.86
Weight of Water, g
Weight of Dry Soil, g
Water Content, %
B. Plastic Limit and Natural Water Content
Plastic Limit Natural Water Content
Test Number → 1 2 1 2
Weight of Wet Soil + Container, g 24.46 26.73 30.5 28.11
Weight of Dry Soil + Container, g 21.79 23.44 24.64 23.69
Weight of Container, g 12.45 13.21 12.32 13.24
Weight of Water, g
Weight of Dry Soil, g
Water Content, %
Avarage %
Prepared By/ Date (Faculty Member) Reviewed By/ Date (Program Chair)
Page 3 of 5
ENGR. KRISTINE R. CERVANCIA / 03-19-2021 ENGR. HERMIE M. DEL PILAR / 03-19-2021
Determine the nearest value of the Liquid Limit of the soil.
a. 39.3% c. 42.5%
b. 35.6% d. 46.7%
CO1 17 Given the laboratory results of the Atterburg Limits Test in Figure 004. Plot the water
content versus the number of blows.
FIGURE 004
A. Liquid Limit
Test Number → 1 2 3 4
Number of Blows 35.00 28.00 20.00 15.00
Weight of Wet Soil + Container, g 91.57 108.16 119.14 114.94
Weight of Dry Soil + Container, g 73.78 85.04 89.56 84.10
Weight of Container, g 21.45 22.56 20.78 19.86
Weight of Water, g
Weight of Dry Soil, g
Water Content, %
B. Plastic Limit and Natural Water Content
Plastic Limit Natural Water Content
Test Number → 1 2 1 2
Weight of Wet Soil + Container, g 24.46 26.73 30.5 28.11
Weight of Dry Soil + Container, g 21.79 23.44 24.64 23.69
Weight of Container, g 12.45 13.21 12.32 13.24
Weight of Water, g
Weight of Dry Soil, g
Water Content, %
Avarage %
Prepared By/ Date (Faculty Member) Reviewed By/ Date (Program Chair)
Page 5 of 5
ENGR. KRISTINE R. CERVANCIA / 03-19-2021 ENGR. HERMIE M. DEL PILAR / 03-19-2021