Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Critical Thinking Assignment
Critical Thinking Assignment
Critical Thinking Assignment
CJ 1010
Zierse
Abstract
This paper is going to discuss the topic of the death penalty. It will explain both
for and against the abolishment of the death penalty, as well as the pros and cons for
each side. Evidence and statistics will be provided throughout the paper gathered from
several different scholarly sources and articles. It will discuss topics varying from costs
for the death penalty, unjust criminal trials, protecting the public from crimianls, and
bringing closure to suffering families. Overall, it will inform you about the many differing
opinions surrounding the topic of the death penalty and its consequences.
The Death Penalty 3
Introduction
The death penalty has long been a controversial issue in our criminal justice
system for centuries, and is still dependable of the situation at hand, along with the
location. Between the years of 1953 and 2015, the number of inmates under the
sentence of death in the United States grew from fewer than 500 to slightly less than
3,000. The numbers then skyrocketed during the 1980s and 1990s before leveling off
around the dawn of the 21st century and then declining (GALE, 2016). So the question
we ask is “ Should the death penalty be abolished all together, or stay as a punishment
for specific and deserving crimes? '' Ending someone’s life is an irreversible
consequence, so how do we decide which of those are “ deserving crimes” ? And how
do we decide if someone is truly guilty of a crime that writes them a death sentence?
All throughout the years, our government and justice systems have made
mistakes with convicting people of crimes, and that’s one good reason why people think
getting rid of the death penalty is a good idea. If fact, according to the article “ The
Conservative Case Against the Death Penalty”, around 160 individuals have been
wrongly convicted, sentenced to die, and ultimately freed from prison since 1973. That
equates to roughly one erroneous conviction and release for every nine executions
(Rizer, 2019). This means that people are being threatened with death even when they
may have never done anything wrong. The article also provides an example story
involving this issue about a man that served in the military, who had never previously
committed a crime. He was accused of murdering a woman at a nearby bar shortly after
The Death Penalty 4
his service, even with hardly any evidence. There were supposed nash marks on the
victims side that matched the DNA of the man's mouth, which was enough to give him
the name “snaggletooth killer”. He was determined to be put to death soon after. It took
10 years until the man was finally proven innocent in the courts. It is sad to say that
something like this wasn’t the first and last time someone was going to have to live
In the article titled “ The case against the Death Penalty”, the ACLU says that the
death penalty is an unjust and unfair manner against people. It says that it largely
depends on how much money the suspect has, the skills of the attorneys involved, and
where the crime took place. It goes on to say that the death penalty is a waste of
taxpayer funds and that states with the death penalty have the highest murder rates
(Bedau, 1973). Another thing to consider is the cost of keeping the death penalty. Ron
Briggs, who was the former District IV Supervisor of El Dorado County in California says
that California taxpayers have unknowingly spent more than $5 billion to maintain a
death row that now houses 747 convicted criminals. During this time, only 13 people
have been put to death, at an eye-popping price tag of $384 million per execution
(Briggs, 2019). These are some main reasons that may convince people that the death
In contrast to these opinions, there are also many valid reasons why the death
penalty needs to stay. It is important to have capital punishment for people that commit
horrendous crimes where other punishments are simpy insufficiant, inlcluding a life
the government for the commission of serious crimes. The word capital comes from the
Latin word capitalis, meaning “of the head” (Gale, 2016). Our government system in the
United States is based on the separation of federal and state powers, so individual
It is important to consider that many victims of these horrific crimes want justice
served to their murderer. The death penalty allows people to close their open wounds
when the person that put them thorugh so much heartache is not around anymore. In
some cases, murder cases are pushed aside and their sentencing times are lowered or
cleared. Or the worst case scenario happens when the person who committed the crime
is released back into the streets with a possible parole officer. The Los Angeles Airport
Peace Officers Association says that giving up on the death penalty would mean giving
up on justice for crime victims and their families. The prisoners that are currently on
California’s death row have murdered more than 1,000 people. Of those, 229 were
children, 43 were peace officers, and 294 of the victims were sexually assaulted and
tortured. Thus being said, having a functional death penalty law will help us protect the
public from society’s worst criminals and bring some measure of closure to the familly.
An example of a crime like this could be the Oklahoma City bombing performed by a
man named Timothy Mcveigh who killed 168 people in the act. Timothy was executed
for his crime, and that fact did not trouble most people. Kent Scheidegger, a Legal
Director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, says that the death penalty is great
because it absolutely guarentees that the killer will never kill again. A life sentence does
not. She further explains that there are many cases of people killed by murderers who
were paroled, escaped, killed within prison, or who arranged murders from within the
The Death Penalty 6
prison (Scheidegger, 2008). Therefore, keeping the death penalty in place confirms that
Conclusion
In conclusion, there are many varying opinions concerning the death penalty and
its nature. Different people have different views on the subject depending on their life
Sources
Oregonians For Alternatives To The Death Penalty. (n.d.). The Facts: 13 Reasons to Oppose
the Death Penalty. https://oadp.org/facts/13-reasons
Rizer, A. (2019, January). The Conservative Case Against the Death Penalty.
https://www.rstreet.org/2019/01/09/the-conservative-case-against-the-death-penalty/
DANDo", S. (1996). Toward the Abolition of the Death Penalty. Indiana Law Journal.
https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1810&context=ilj
GALE. (2016). A Continuing Conflict: A History of Capital Punishment in the United States.
gale.com. https://www.gale.com/open-access/death-penalty
Eportfolio:
https://kennedyvankomen.weebly.com/
The Death Penalty 8
Assignment Reflection
This assignment has made me realize that there are many differing opinions
about our criminal justice system and the death penalty. I assumed that most people
wanted to keep the death penalty, but I found that there are many articles talking about
the negatives of the death penalty. I think that that assumption is valid because it is not
a heavily pronounced topic on social media. It has been a hot topic a few times
throughout the last century, but there has never been a final decision or conclusion on
the matter. After doing this research essay, I have found that through many facts and
data, it makes sense that there are varying opinions, with both pros and cons for both
sides. This assignment has changed my perspective because I have learned that the
death penalty costs a lot of money and can be unjust, but it other ways, it allows closure