Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unit 8 Nature of Regional Politics: 8.0 Objectives
Unit 8 Nature of Regional Politics: 8.0 Objectives
Unit 8 Nature of Regional Politics: 8.0 Objectives
POLITICS
Structure
8.0 Objectives
8.1 In troduction
8.2 M ajo r Political D evelopm ents
8.2.1 Northern and Eastern India
8.2.2 Western and Central India
8.2.3 The Deccan
8.2.4 Southern India
8.3 R econstructions o f Indian Polity betw een Eighth an d T hirteenth Centuries
8.3.1 Feudal Polity
8.3.2 Segmentary State
8.3.3 Integrative Polity /
8.4 Let Us Sum Up
8.5 Key W ords
8 .6 Answers to Check Y our Progress Exercises
8.0 OBJECTIVES
8.1 INTRODUCTION
This U nit seeks to define the essential com ponents o f Indian polity through m ajor
political developm ents. The sub-continent has been divided into various region^ for
the purpose. T here has also been a n effort to m ark the im pact o f certain
developm ents across the north-w estern borders (in W est an d C entral Asia) on*the
Indian political scene. Finally,, the m ajof th ru st o f the U nit is on understanding the
n atu re of regional politics, i.e. to deal w ith the question o f characterizing fo rm /s of
polity in India.
In Orissa a n um ber o f small kingdom s and principalities appeared along the coast of
Bay of Bengal and in the hilly hinterland. K alinga, K ongoda, D akshina Tosali and
U ttara Tosali were situated at the Bay o f Bengal and D akshina Kosala in the upper
M ahanadi valley. The borders o f the different kingdom s varied from tim e to tim e
bu t th e to p o g rap h y of th eir centres and their spatial distribution rem ained alm ost
unchanged from the sixth to tw elfth centuries. The kings donated lands to
brah m an as who perform ed various adm inistrative and ritualistic functions. Land
The post ten th century scene in C entral and W estern India saw the rise o f num erous
powers, w ho claimed to be R ajputs and m any of w hom were feudatories of the
G u ijara P ratiharas. T he emergence o f these R ajput families is linked up w ith
increase in land grants and consequent new land relationships. They were also the
p roducts o f fusion o f foreign and local elements, and som e segm entation o f a few
clans. A m ongst these newly em ergent powers in C entral and W estern India one can
include the Chandellas in K hajuraho, the C hauhans in A jm er, the P aram aras in
M alwa, the K alachuris in T ripuri (near Jab alp u r), the C haulukyas in G ujarat, the
G uhilas in M ewar and the T om aras w ith their headquarters in m odern Delhi. The
different Rajput clans] constructed their fortresses on a large-scale which represented
the num erous foci o f bower. C ertain am ount o f inter-clan m arriages am ongst som e
o f these R ajput families led to wider areas o f social and political activity.
The political developm ents in N orth, W estern and C entral India were considerably
influenced by the changes tak in g places in the contem porary W est and C entral Asia.
T he com ing of the A rabs (seventh-eighth centuries), first as traders and later as
invaders, had already m ade substantial im pact in India. The G urjara P ratiharas,
Palas and the Rashtrajkutas had to deal with this challenge in econom ic and political
spheres.
T he S am anids ruled oVer Trans-O xiana, K hurasan an d parts o f Iran in the ninth
century. A m ong the Sam anid governors was a T urkish slave, A laptigin, w ho later
established an independent kingdom w ith its capital at G hazni. A fter som etim e
M ahm ud (998-1030 A.|d .) ascended the th ro n e at G hazni and brought P u njab and
M ultan und er his control. M ahrtiud undertook m any raids and plundered m any '
tem ples in India know n for th eir wealth, largely to consolidate his own position in
C entral Asia. A nother house th a t penetrated India was th a t B hur in N orth-w est
A fghanistan. Shahabucjklin M uham m ed (1173-1206 A .D .) of this house conquered
M ultan, Uchch, L ahore; created a base in P unjab and finally defeated the C hauhan
ruler Prithviraj in the Second battle o f T arain in 1192. He also defeated Jaich an d ra
o f the G ahadaval dynasty (K anauj based) in the battle o f C handw ar in 1194. Such
attem pts of C entral A sian chiefs finally led to the establishm ent o f the T urkish
em pire in N o rth India in the early th irteen th century under the M am luk Sultans such
as Q utbuddin A ibak arid Iltutm ish.
13) .Which o f th e follow ing statem ents are right ( w " ) o r w rong ( x ) ?
i) K anauj, in the G anga Valley becam e p rom inent due to its strategic ana.
geographical potentiality.
ii) T he R ash trak u tas were prim arily centred in E astern India.
iii) The V arm an rulers o f Assam gave im petus to the construction o f irrigational
works.
iv) T he fam ous S u n Tem ple a t K onark was constructed in the tw elfth century.
f) restricted use o f m etal money (See also Unit 3.3.1 and 3.4.2) '
The degree o f the dependence o f the peasants on landlords m ight differ from region
to region. However, the developm ent o f agriculture, handicrafts, com m odity
production, trade an d com m erce an d o f urbanisation (See also Block-1) could create
conditions for differentiation in the ranks o f the peasantry. H ierarchical control over
land was created by sub-infeudation in certain areas. Which gave rise to graded types
o f landlords.
Recently the validity o f the feudal form ation in the context o f medieval India has
been questioned. It Jias been suggested th a t the medieval society was characterised by
self-dependent or free peasant production. The peasants had control over the means
an d the processes o f production. It is added that .there was relative stability in social
and econom ic stru ctu re and there was not m uch Sftange a t the levelo f techniques of
agricultural production. The conflicts were over the distribution and redistribution of
the surplus th an over a redistribution o f m eans of production. The ap p ro p riatio n of
agrarian surplus to the state form ed the chief instrum ent of exploitation. The high
fertility of land an d the low subsistence level of the peasant facilitated the state
appropriation o f the surplus in conditions of relative stability. This line o f approach II
Indian Polky In Its Regional does not take note o f superior rights a n d inferior rights of one party or another over
Variations : 8th To I3th Century land. In fact in early medieval times in the same piece pf land the peasant held
inferior rights and the landlords held superior rights. The land grants clearly m ade
the position o f landlords stronger over the land as com pared to th a t of peasants. The.
critique o f feudal polity unfortunately does not take note o f massive evidence in
support o f the subjection and im m obility of peasantry, which is an indispensable
element in feudal system. Also, this critique is a disguised attem pt to reinforce the
colonialist view of stagnating and unchanging Indian society.
The integrative polity, like the feudal polity, sees political processes in term s o f *
parallels with contem porary econom ic,'social and religious developm ents, such a s :
■ . \
i) horizontal spread of rural agrarian settlem ents (See also Unit 1.2),
ii) horizontal spread of the dom inant ideology of social o rder based on varna •
division (See also Unit 2.1 and 2.3), and ' '
iii) integration o f local cults, rituals and sacred centres into a larger structure (See j
also Unit 2.3).
However, this form ulation suffers from definitional vagueness. The term s “lineage
d o m ain ” an d “state society” are not clarified. F urther, the sam antas even in their
trans-political sense rem ained a landed aristocracy. M ore im portantly, neither the
segm entary state nor the integrative polity models provide alternative m aterial bases
which could be contrasted with th a t of the feudal polity. Both integration and
segm entation can be explained in term s of land g ran ts which form ed the crucial
elem ent in the feudal .structure. In as much as local landlords of chieftains derived
their fiscal and adm inistrative powers from the King (the overlord), paid tributes and
perform ed m ilitary and adm inistrative obligations tow ards him, they w orked for Nature of Regional Politics
integration. On the other hand, when they ruled over the local peasants in' an
autonom ous m anner it am ounted to the segm entation o f authority. “ Lineage
geography” which is crucial for the reconstruction in term s of integrative polity, is
not available On pan-India scale. Except in the case of the C hauhans and P aram aras,
‘lineage’ did not play an im p o rtan t p art in the organisation o f polity. Even ranks
were form ed on the basis of unequal distribution o f land and its revenue resources.
Sim ilarly, the distinction between political and ritual suzerainty coupled with their
association with the core and the periphery respectively, which is considered the
com eretone o f the concept o f the segm entary state suffers from the absence of
empirical d a ta from m any im p o rtan t regions of the Indian sub-continent. On the
contrary, the reconstruction o f medieval Indian polity in term s of feudalism relies on
such elem ents which can be applied to practically the whole o f India.
3) W hat do you u nderstand by the term Segm entary State? Explain in ab out 10
lines. * '
8.4 LET US SUM UP
• In K ashm ir the pow erful landow ning social groups—particularly priests and
<j9 inar^s influenced the internal politics. .
• G anga Valley and K anauj were an im portant bone o f contention till at least
m id-ninth century. Three im portant powers o f N orth and W est India as well as
th a t of the D eccan, viz., the Palas, G urjara P ratiharas and the R ashtrakutas were
actively involved in this.
• A ssam was undergoing the processes of transition fropi tribal polity to state polity
and was getting linked up w ith N orthern India.
• In O rissa too, the state was em erging w ith strong tribal elements.
• In W estern and C entral India there was phenom enal increase in R ajput families
m ost of w hom were feudatories of the G urjara P ratiharas.
• Developm ents in Welst and C entral Asia had considerable im pact on the Indian
political scene. F rom the days of the arrival o f the A rabs as traders in the seventh
century to the establishm ent of the T urkish em pire in the beginning o f the
th irteen th century, the Indian sub-continent rem ained an im portant target o f
external forces.
• In the Deccan and the S outh the tussle between the K arnataka based powers and
those in the Kaveri Valley was a recurring them e. Equally persistent was the lure
of the coastal A ndhra Pradesh (Vengi). W ars am ongst the C holas, Pandyas and
Cheras and occasional involvem ent of Sri Lanka in these encounters are other
im p o rtan t features o f the political scene in the region. Also, the C hola kings m ade
successful efforts td reach beyond the seas—as far as the South-east Asia.
• The reconstructions o f medieval Indian political structure have broadly followed
three lines o f en q u iry —feudal polity, segm entary state and integrative polity.
W hile the latter tw o seem to have limited and localised applicability, they have
not been able to rationalize the concepts in term s o f alternative m aterial bases.
T heir reliance on the essential elem ents o f m ode of production o f the ‘feudal
m odel' coupled w ith |a tte r’s applicability on alm ost pan-Indian scale m ake
R.S. S harm a ’s contention m ore acceptable in the present state of research. Indeed,
polity of different regions is still to be analysed separately and there is a need to
establish em pirically the relationship am ongst different regions o f the Indian
sub-continent.
9.0 OBJECTIVES
9.1 INTRODUCTION
The preceding Unit (No. 8 ) had attem pted to introduce you to a theoretical debate .
on the n ature o f political organisation in the Indian sub-continent between the eighth i
an d thirteenth centuries. The present Unit, however, is a specific case study of N o rth t
an d East India. The overall reconstruction has been done w ithin the fram ew ork o f r
w hat has been described as feudal polity. The Unit seeks to show the limits of the so
called centralised m onarchies and the real natu re of new royalty. We will discuss the /
' I I
p attern o f landholdings, the distribution o f adm inistrative and fiscal powers and the
transfer of judicial and policing rights. We will also analyse the emergence o f a new
type of bureaucracy, the hierarchy of sam antas and the m ultifarious functions of
sam antas an d oth er officials. All these are indicators of the rise of m ulti-centered
pow er structure in the Iregion under discussion. The U nit also seeks to highlight th e
ideological base of this structure. , .
Northern and Eastern India
9.2 THE REGION DEFINED
W ritings since the early 1930s have opened up great m any issues bearing.on the
political structure of N orthern and E astern India. It was a product o f a set of
changes a t all levels and in all spheres. The pace o f these changes was determ ined by
the m echanism o f land grants (see also B lock-1). Broadly, the understanding of
centuries an d the regions u n d er discussion in term s o f feudalism have been the m ost
d om inating strain o f recent historical writings on the political set up.
H ow do es one define N o rth ern and Eastern India? G enerally, territories n o rth o f the
V indhyas and up to the H im alayan tarai a re included. However, m odern states
com prising G ujarat, R ajasth an and m ost o f M adhya P radesh are being excluded
from this discussion, for, they have been tak en as constituting W estern and Central
India (See also Unit-10). T hus, K ashm ir, P unjab, H im achal Pradesh, H aryana and
U tta r P radesh m ake up N orthern India while the Eastern India com prises Bihar,
Bengal (including present day Bangladesh), O rissa and A ssam as well as other states
o f the B rah m ap u tra Valley. Im p o rtan t political pow ers o f these regions have already
been identified in U nit- 8 .
Early medieval Indian kings are know n to have used very high sounding and
pom pous titles, such as param abhattaraka, m aharqjadhiraja, parameshvara, etc. This
has very often form ed the basis o f seeing these kings as very powerful centralised
m onarchs. However, this is no t true. The evidence relating to the territorial divisions
an d distribution o f adm inistrative and fiscal powers shows the real wielders of
pow er. T he grow ing bardic sycophancy had begun to create an au ra around kings,
treating them as rulers o f rulers an d ascribing divinity to them . A s a result o f this
image building the King was increasingly becom ing m ore o f a private person th an
the real head o f the state. It was not a centralised pow er structure but a m ulti
centered system o f power.
A tw elfth century copper plate g ran t o f V aidyadeva from Assarii m entions bhukti,
m an data and vishya. In O rissa too vishayas and mandalas assigned as fiefs to royal
scions are m entioned in records o f the tw elfth century. Pattalas and pathakas were
adm inistrative units un d er the G ahadavalas.
The literary sources o f the period are also eloquent a b o u t m any o f the aforesaid
adm inistrative units. H arishena’s K athakosha, a w ork o f the tenth century, refers to
a vfchaya in th e sense o f th e principality o f a King w ho has a sam anta under him.
Rajatarangini, the chronicle of K ashm ir, distinguishes between Svamandal and
m andalantar, which suggests th a t kings in K ashm ir exercised direct adm inistrative
control mostly over th eir ow n mandalas while oth er mandalas were governed by
sam antas w ith a n obligation to pay trib u te and a com m itm ent o f allegiance. A t the
lowest level perhaps villages also m ay have acquired a lord either by land grants
placing villages un d er sam anta chiefs or by forceful occupation o r by the subm ission
o f individuals. There is a reference to qulma as consisting o f three to five villages.
F urth er, allusions to gramapati, gramadhipati, d'ashagfamapati, vimshatimsha-
gramapati, sahasragram apati indicate a hierarchy o f villages. The m ode and
qu an tu m o f paym ent to Village heads are also specified. Dashasha (head o f ten
villages) got as m uch land as he could cultivate with one plough. Vimshatisha (head
o f tw enty villages) got land cultivable thro u g h four ploughs. Shatesha (head o f one
hundred villages) was to m aster one full village as his rem uneration.
Indian PolH) In Its Regional 9.3.2 Transfer of Administrative and Fiscal Rights
Variations : 8;h To 13th Century
It was not merely the m ultiplication o f adm inistrative Vinits at different levels. Giving
aw ay fiscal an d adm inistrative rights, including those of policing and adm inistration
o f crim inal law and justice, to donees of land grants created a landed aristocracy
between the King and the cultivators. The intensity o f the process varied from one
region to another.
D ispersal o f adm inistrative pow er which is an im portant trait o f feudal polity, is also
indicated by con stant shift of the seats o f power. Typical exam ples o f this tendency
are to be seen in allusions to about nine skandhavaras (victory/m ilitary cam ps) in
the P ala records. As m any as tw enty-one skandhavaras figure-in the Chandella
records. However, in this respect the P ratiharas enjoyed relative stability, fo r only
Ujjayini and M ahodaya (K annauj) are know n to have been their cajjfital$. Like the
shifting capitals, fortresses also assum ed the functions p f pow er centfes. It is
significant th at the P a lis built as m any as tw enty fortresses in their empire.
- ■ /
2) Nam e the m ain adm inistrative units in different regions o f E astern and N orthern
Indie).
3) W hat do you understand by transfer of adm inistrative and fiscal rights? W rite in
brief.
18
9.4 TRANSFORMED BUREAUCRACY
Parallel to the dispersal o f adm inistrative pow ers as m anifested in the localised units
was the tran sfo rm atio n in the b ureaucratic ap p aratu s in the adm inistrative system.
Paym ent to officials an d vassals by land grants, the hierarchy of samantas,
feudalisation o f titles o f kings an d officials an d distribution o f land to m em bers of
the clan are som e o f the features o f this new bureaucracy.
The bestow al of land on the officials in charge of the adm inistrative divisions of
1,10, 20,100 and 1000 villages is m entioned as early as M anu (c. 200 A.D .). The
practice o f service tenure picks up m om entum in the post-G upta centuries.
« #
The Partabgarh inscription o f M ahendrapala-I I j records the grant of a village which
was in possession o f talavargika H arishena. There is m ounting evidence o f purely
m ilitary grants. L iterary works dealing with Bihar and Bengal between tenth and
twelfth centuries m ake frequent references to various kinds of grants such as deshya,
karaja, gramaja and pratipattaka to m inisters, kinsm en and those who rendered
m ilitary services. The K am auli plate of 1133 A .D . refers to g ran t of a tract o f land to
a chief on rajapatti (royal fillet or tiara) by one o f the ancestors of G ovindacandra
G ahadavala. The rajas, rajaputras, ranakas, rajarajanakas, mahasamantas etc.
m entioned in P ala land charters were m ostly vassals connected with land. Som etim es
even vassals m ade fu rth er grants w ith o r w ithout the perm ission o f their overlords.
This is called sub-infeudation an d was particularly m arked under the G urjara
Pratih aras. Since the original grantee was given the right to cultivate his benefice or
get it cultivated, to enjoy it or get it enjoyed, to d o it or get it done, the field was
wide open to sub-infeudation an d eviction. The m edieval land grants o f O rissa also
refer to bhogi, m ahabhogi, brihadbhogi, sam anta, m ahasam ata, ranaka, rajavailabha,
c All these appear to be landed interm ediaries who also perform ed m ilitary and
ac ’linistrative functions. •
' In the eleventh and tw elfth centuries key officials were also being paid through
j regular an d exclusive taxes. Officers connected with revenue collection, crim inal
adm inistration including policing, accounts an d m em bers of the palace staff enjoyed
levies specifically raised fo r them . T hus, the akshapatalikas, pratiharas and
vishatiathus (possibly a revenue official o f a group o f tw enty eight villages) under the
G ahadavalas received such sustenance.
By the end o f the period under survey, the m ultifarious functions o f the samantas
had com e to be recognised. Som e o f these included regular paym ent of tributes,
com pliance with im perial orders and attendance at .the im perial court on cerem onial
occasions, adm inistering justice, military' obligations, etc. T he Rajaniti Ratnakara
w ritten by C handeshw ar o f M ithila (n o rth Bihar) in the thirteenth century classifies
samantas into sakara an d akara depending on \h e ir obligations in respect o f the
paym ent of tributes.
Indian Polity In 1$ Regional T h e C handellas of Jejak ab h u k ti (B undelkhand) m ade frequent land grants to
Variations: 8th ’fo 13th Century m ilitary officials. A jayapala, the brahm ana senapati o f P aram ard in was a recipient of
pada o f land in 1166 A .D . A few years later in 1171, a whoie village was granted to
. the brahmaiift senapati M adanapala Sharm a, whose three im m ediate predecessors -
‘ ^farre thakkuras. The grant was free from past, present and fu tu re dues—a ‘ .
characteristic of all C handella grants. Sometimes death in the battlefield also resulted
in grants to m ilitary personnel. A n evidence of a purely non-sectarian copper plate
charter o f land given to a hereditary brahm ana m ilitary official is the Tehri plate of
T railokyavarm an (1207-08 A .D .).
G rants for m ilitary service were m ade to kayasthas as well. M em bers o f the Vastavya
Kayastha family functioned as w arriors. This fam ily enjoyed im portance in
C handella adm inistration for nearly three hundred years from G anda to Bhojavarm a.
T hough there are m any instances of land grants to rautas and iranakas by
G ahadavala kings, m ilitary services and acts of bravery are not specified as response
for these grants. But it is equally tru e th at they were vassals, distinct from regular
officials under the direct control o f the state because ranakas and rautas are not
m entioned in the list o f officials given in G ahadavala inscriptions. It is significant
th a t the Latakam elaka, a satirical w ork com posed in the tw elfth century under the
patronage o f the G ahadavalas, refers to a rauttaraja called Sam gram avisara.
E njoying a gram apatta apparently for m ilitary service, this rauttaraja appears as a
prom inent social figure.
The n atu re o f the bond between the superior and inferior vassals and between the
vassal and lord is rather uncertain. W hile there is som e evidence about a w ritten
contract em bodying only the obligations o f the vassal, the Rajatarangini also shows
signs o f m utual oral understanding between a tenth century King, C hakravarm an
and a leading dam ara chief called Sam gram a. We do not find m any such instances.
O n the one hand we hear o f vassals’ autonom y in their respective spheres, there is
also available on the oth er hand the evidence o f the P ala King (R am apala) seeking
help o f his vassals to suppress the revolt o f the kaivarttas in the late eleventh
century. It is, however, interesting to note th at the sentim ents o f loyalty and
allegiance to a com m on overlord went beyond caste considerations. Thus, the
shabara chief and a vaishya caravan leader, who have a com m on overlord, regard
themselves as sambandhins.
Som e insights into the lord-vassal relationship are also provided by the usage of
pancham ahashabda, which seems to have developed as a sam anta institution in the
p ost-G upta centuries. M any inscriptions show th at a m easure o f the high feudal rank
enjoyed by some vassals was their investiture w ith the pancham ahashabda by their
overlords.
A copper plate inscription o f 893 A .D . records a grant o f land by the m ahasam anta
B akavarm an, whose father had obtained the pancham ahashabda through the grace
o f M ahendrayudhadeva (M ahendrapala of K annauj). Surprisingly, the term was not
know n in the P ala kingdom , although it is know n in Assam and Orissa.
There is little doubt th at the acquisition o f the pancham ahashabda was the highest
distinction th at could be attained by a vassal—indeed, even the Yuvaraja (crow n
prince) enjoyed no higher feudal privilege th an this. The sam antas continued to bezr
this epithet even after ad o p tin g such grandiloquent titles as param abhattaraka-
maharajadhiraja-param eshvara.
A ccording to a text of the twelfth century, the privilege o f pancham ahashabda -
signified the use of five musical instrum ents. These are referred to as shringa (horn),
tam m ata (tabor), shankha (conch), bheri (drum ) and jayaghanta (bell o f victory). In
some parts o f N orth India, the term pancham ahashabda indicated five official
designations w ith the prefix m aha. If the w ord shabda is connected with the root
shap, it acquires an additional m eaning o f o ath o r vow. If so, it would have an
im p o rtan t bearing on the rendering o f pancham ahashabda in term s o f state
officials' and lord-vassal relationship.
The lord-vassal bond and the sam anta hierarchy do not show any distinctive sign of Northern and Eastern India
decay even in the changed econom ic scenario o f the post-tenth century. Trade and
cash nexus are recognised as factors which weaken feudal form ation. There are clear
signs o f the revival o f internal as well as external trade and currency between tenth
and tw elfth centuries (see Unit 3 Block-1). Indian feudalism as a political system, far
from getting dissipated, shows rem arkable fluidity and adaptability. A phenom enon
o f a som ew hat sim ilar kind has been noticed in the 17th century Russia where serf
econom y began to ad ap t itself to th e developing m arkets. It is, however, necessary to
add th a t feudalism as an econom ic system does show signs of cracking up. This is
specially true o f W estern India where the self-sufficient feudal econom y had com e
under special strain due to revival o f trade, money and urban growth. The situation,
however, is not w ithout its co n trasts—the east, viz. Bihar, Bengal and Orissa, show a
considerable resilience. Further, land service grants to vassals and officials are more
com m on in the west then in the east, with the exception o f Orissa.
The N orthern and Eastern India com prises m odern states of K ashm ir, Punjab,
H im achal Pradesh, H aryana, U ttar Pradesh, Bihar, fiengal, O rissa, Assam and parts
o f n orthern M adhya Pradesh. The political structure of these regions between ih e
eighth and thirteenth centuries was m arked by:
Adaya Taxes
Pratipattaka S am e, as deshya
A dm inistrative Unit
10.1 INTRODUCTION
O w ing to the fact th at regional political form ations in various parts o f India have
no t been studied fully, the generalizations a t sub-continental level require further
precision. T he study o f regional political form ations should, however, assume
im portance in view o f the fact t h a t :
1) there were frequent shifts in the centres of powers, and
2 ) the form ation o f new polities was a continuous process.
W estern and C entral India provide us w ith exam ples o f fresh spurt in the emergence
o f local states. F o r exam ple, the R ajput clans such as the C u rja ra P ra tih ara , G uhila,
P aram ara, C hah am an a as Well as the K alachuris and C handella exploited political
uncertainties of p o st-G u p ta and post tenth centuries in W estern and C entral India.
T hey dom inated the political scene for centuries, especially during the period
ndian Polk; In Its Regional extending from the eighth to the thirteenth centuries. The picture of the political
ariations : 8th To 13th Century processes that resulted in the replacement of old dynasties by new R ajput powers of
uncertain origin is not clear. None the less, an attem pt has been made to w ork out
some essential traits of the nature of the distribution o f political authority. Unlike
N orthern and Eastern India, the region unfier discussion shows some influence of
lineage—at least in some parts of the region (See also Unit 8.3.3). Even in these
parts, the dispersal o f adm inistrative and fiscal powers along with the changes in the
bureaucratic set-up—all based on new landholdings set the tone of feudal polity.
The Arab,s invaded Sind and M ultan in 712-13 A.D. W ithin the next 25 years tfyey
overran M arw ar, M alu a and Broach and threatened other parts of India These
raids contributed to rem arkable changes in the political map of Western India and
the Deccan. Powers like R ashtrakutas and clans n o \\ know n to us as R ajputs came
to the fore in this period. These clans, not heard of in earlier times, began to play an
im portant part from about the eighth century. W ith obscure origins the lineages like
the Param aras and the C haham anas, after passing through m any'vicissitudes, came
to the fore in the context of the inter-state conflicts of the m ajor powers such as the
G urjara P ratiharas and R ashtrakutas (See also Unit 8 .2 .1).
The problem of the origin of R ajput dynasties is highly com plex and controversial/
Their gotrochhara makes them kshatriyas of the Lunar family (Somavamshi) while
o n the basis o f old kavyas some m aintain that they were of the Solar race. The
myths of Solar origin regard them as kshatriya created in kaliyuga to wipe-out the
mlecchas (foreigners). R ajasthani bards and chroniclers regarcj them as fire-born
(Agnikula).
A ccording to the Agnikula myth recorded by a court poet, the founder of the house
o f the Param aras originated from the firepit of sage Vasishtha on \l o u n t Abu. The
m an who thus sprang t>ut of the fire forcibly wrested the w ish-granting cow of sage
Vasishtha from sage Vishwam itra and restored it to the form er. Sage Vasishtha gave
him the fitting nam e of param ara—slayer of the enemy. From him sprang a race
which obtained high eslteem by virtuous kings. The P aram ara inscriptions also
declare the origi.i o f the P aram aras from the firepit of sage Vasishtha on the M ount
Abu. ■ ‘
The R ajasthani bards went a step further and ascribed.the fire origin not only to the
Param aras but also to the Pratiharas, the C haulukyas o f G ujarat and the
C haham anas. Speaking o f the fire origin o f the C haham anas the bardic tales said
that A gastya and othetf sages began a great sacrifice on the M ount Abu. Demons
rendered it itripure by show ering dow n filthy things. Vasishtha created from the
firepit three w arriors P ratihara, C haulukya, and P aram ara, but none succeeded in
keeping the dem ons away. Vasishtha dug a new pit from where issued- fo rth a four >
arm ed figure. The sages nam ed him C hahuvana. This w arrior defeated the dem ons.
This Agnikula myth was nothing more than poetic im agination o f bards. In their
hunt for a fine pedigree for their patrons they had woven the story o f'th e fire-origin;
o f the P aram aras. They found that it could splendidly explain the origin o f the
C haham anas to o if thejy a d d e d ‘some m ore details.
The problem o f the origin, when viewed in its totality instead o f viewing it from the Western and Central India
angle of any particular dynasty, would help us understand its political significance.
The practice o f new social groups claiming kshatriya status became widespread in the
early medieval period. Kshatriya status was one of the various symbols that the
emergent social groups sought for the legitim ation of their newly acquired power.
The early medieval and medieval R ajput clans, representing a mixed caste and
constituting a fairly large section o f petty chiefs holding estates, achieved political
eminence gradually. T here was corresponding relationship between the achievem ent .
o f political em inence by P ratiharas, G uhilas, C haham anas and other clans and their
movement tow ards a respectable social status, viz. acquiring a kshatriya lineage. In
this context it is im portant to note that these dynasties claimed descent from ancient
kshatriyas long after their accession to power. Let us note the exam ple of the
G urjara P ratiharas, chronologically the earliest and historically the most im portant
of the Rajput dynasties. In an inscription o f the late ninth century issued by King
Bhoja-I they claim Solar descent for the dynasty and say that Lakshm ana, the
brother of the epic hero R am a was the ancestor of their family. Their inscriptions
are silent on the question o f origin till the glorious days of Bhoja. This epigraphic
tradition o f the Solar descent is connected chronologically with the period during
which the G urjara P ratiharas were the dom inant political power. The tradition, thus,
represents a stage of im perial prom inence with the tem ptation to establish a link with
the heroic age of the epics. The tradition o f the legendary kshatriya origin o f powers
such as the P aram aras and C haham anas too had not originated at the initial stage of
the rise pf these powers. In short, the entry to the R ajput fold was possible through
the acquisition o f political power. And the newly acquired power was to be
legitimised by cjaiming linkages with the kshatriya lines of the mythical past. (See
also Unit 9.7). .
I
3) Which o f the following statem ents are right ( ^ ) o r wrong ( )?
i) R ajput clans suddenly appeared on the Indian political scene.
ii)' New social groups started claim ing kshatriya status in the early medieval
period.
iii) A rabs invaded'S ind in sixlh century A.D.
iv) T here is no problem regarding the origin o f R ajput dynasties.
The C hapas were a n o th er R ajput clan o f the early m edieval period. They ruled over
principalities like B hillam ala, V adhiar in K athiaw ad, an d A n ah ilap atak a in G ujarat.
Sim ilarly th e G uhilas ruled over the regions o f U d aipur and M ewar.
A p art from th e sub-divisions o f m ajor clans, the em ergence o f various m inor clans
was an o th er im p o rtan t aspect o f the proliferation o f the R ajputs in early m edieval
period. T he continuing process o f the form ation o f R ajput clans was th ro u g h the
acquisition o f political pow er. T he new clans and sub-divisions o f earlier clans were
d raw n in to R ajp u t political netw ork in a variety o f ways.
S im ilar m ovem ents are found in the case Of the G uhilas and the C haham anas as
well. F o r exam ple, though the G uhila settlem ents were to be found in various parts
o f R ajasth an as early as the seventh century, slightly later traditions recorded in the
inscriptions o f the N agada-A har G uhilas trace their m ovem ent from ' G ujarat. The
bardic trad itio n also suggests th a t the G uhila kingdom s in so u th R ajasthan
succeeded the earlier trib al chiefdom s o f the Bhils.
The m ovem ent o f the C hauhanas was from A hich h atrap u ra to Jangaldesha
(S hakam bhari) w hich, as the nam e indicates, was an inhospitable area. T heir
m ovem ent led to its colonization. A tenth century record says th a t L akshm ana, the
son o f V akpati-I o f the S hakam bhari C hah am an a lineage started w ith few follow ers
and fought against the M edas w ho had been terrorising th e people aro u n d N addula
w ith th eir free-booting raids. It so pleased the brahm ana m asters o f the area th a t ,
they appointed him th e g u ard o f the tow ns. G radually L akshm ana b u ilt up a small
b an d o f tro o p ers an d suppressed the M edas in their, ow n territory. T he M edas agreed
to keep off from villages paying trib u te to L akshm ana. H e becam e a m aster o f 2000
horses an d extended his dom inions a t ease an d built a great palace in N adol.
The em ergence of the political pow ers in W estern and C entral India was associated
with certain features. A t the level o f econom y the patterns o f land distribution are
notew orthy. From a b o u t the late ten th century there are evidences for the
distribution o f land am ong the m em bers o f C haham ana ruling lineages. King
S im haraja, his brothers V atsasraja and V igrharaja and his tw o brothers C h andaraja,
and G ovindaraja had their own personal estates. In the areas held by the
C haham anas o f N adol assignm ents called as grasa, grasabhumil o r bhukti were held
by the King, the crow n prince, oth er sons o f the King, queens and so on. The
incidence o f these assignm ents was higher in R ajasthan th a n in other parts. This
feature apparently represented a process w hich gradually developed and was
associated with the spread o f a clan. A nother p attern was the holding o f units
consisting o f villages w hich were p art o f adm inistrative divisions as m andala or
bhukti. These units seem to have becom e centres o f som e kind o f local control. The
units o f 84 villages (chaurasia) which were held in S au rastra by the G urjara
P ratih aras g rad u ally spread to R ajasthan. This extension facilitated the land
d istrib u tio n and political co n tro l am ong the ruling elites. Between the tenth and
tw elfth centuries th e kings and princes o f C h ah am an a and P a ram ara clans held such
big holdings. The process coincided w ith the construction o f fortresses on a large
scale in different locations. A p art from serving defence purposes the fortresses also
worked as foci o f co n tro l fo r th eir rural surroundings and helped the process o f the
consolidation o f ruling families.
The m arriage netw ork am ong the ruling clans is an o th er pointer to the process o f the
consolidation o f clan pow er a t the social level. M arriage netw ork brought about
inter-clan relationship which had significant political im plications because the "
fam ilies were m qstly the ruling R ajput clans. A part from P a ra m ara-R ash trak u ta and
C h ah am an a-P aram ara m atrim onial relations, the G uhila m arriage netw ork was
varied and w idespread. T hough the G uhilas extended th eir m arriage relations w ith
C haulukyas, R ash trak u tas, Chedis and H unas in addition to those w ith R ajput clans '
like C h ah am an a a n d the P aram ara, the. m arriage netw ork m ostly constituted the 31
Indian PoBty In Its Regional R ajput clan category. The choice obviously was political as the families cited above
Variations: Mb To 13th Century constituted the ruling elite of the early medieval W estern India. Inter-clan m arriage
' relationships were expected to lead to collaboration in wider activities o f socio
political n atu re since they facilitated the presence o f clan m em bers in different- -
kingdom an d courts.
2) Cite exam ples o f the assignm ent o f land am ong royal kinsm en in R ajasthan in
the post-tenth century,
• ' - t ’
3) W hich o f the follow ing statem ents are right ( v ' ) or w rong ( X ) ?
i) The newly acquired power was sought to be legitimised by claim ing
respectable social status. ' •
ii) T he m arriage netw ork am ong the ruling clans had nothing to do with wider
. activities o f socio-political nature.
iii) lnter-clan m arriages had significant political im plications.
iv) T he acquisition o f political pow er had no role in the form ation of R ajput
clans. ' • ,
• !
The political geography o f early medieval W estern India and the evidence o f the
form ation o f political auth o rity in disparate zones by ever proliferating lineages in
G ujarat, R ajasthan and M alwa show th at there was not always a necessary
corresponding relation between a ruling lineage and a fixed territory. T he m ovem ent
o f lineages outside their early centres o f pow er led to the establishm ent o f new ruling
families. Guhilas of MeWar may be cited as one am ong such lineages.
Lekhapaddhati furnishes the names o( karanas (departm ents) of the governm ent. It is
supposed to be applicable to the C haulukya'governm ent as the largest num ber o f its
. docum ents are datable to the C haulukya period in the history of G ujarat. A few
karanas m entioned in the work also figure in the C haulukya records. Sri-Karana
(C hief secretariat), for instance, is a fam iliar term in their inscriptions. Also known
from their records are Vyaya Karana or the accounts departm ent, Vyapara-Karana
or the departm ent in charge of general supervision of trade and the collection of
im port and export duties and mandapika-karna or the secretariat in charge of the
collection o f taxes. Such karanas were headed by m inisters know n by the term
mahaniatyas. Little except the names ol these ministers are.available in the records
and the actual n atu re and functions of bureaucracy are difficult to determ ine. Besides
the mahamatyas, there were other officers called mahamantrins, mantrins and
sachivas. The inform ation about their status is also very meagre as they are only
casually m entioned in only a few inscriptions. O f the more frequently mentioned
officers in early medieval W estern India was m ahasandhivigrahita who was a
minister o f peace and war and whose duties also included that of a conveyor of a ,
grant. A mahamatya mahasandhivigrahika of the Chaulukyas was also in charge of
the Sri-Karana and the M udra (the departm ent that issued passports and collected
im port duties). A nother officer m entioned was m ahakshapatalika or the head of
accounts or record office. He kept a full account of the income of the state and also
of the expenditure. He also registered land grants under the Param ara
adm inistration.
M ahamantrin o r m ahapradhana, literally m eaning a chief minister, was an official of
great im portance. He held charge ol the royal seal and exercised general supervision •
over all departm ents. Dandanayaka or senapati was also an im portant official, who
was prim arily a m ilitary officer. The C haham ana records show that the cavalary
com m anders and baladhipas or officers in charge o f the m ilitary stationed in
outposts and towns were placed under him. The whole adm inistration was controlled
by a departm ent, the Baladhikarana, stationed at the capital.
The so called central officialdom also included, am ong others, the dutaka who
conveyed the rulers sanction o f a grant to local officials who then had the charter
draw n up and delivered. M ahapratihara (the l ord cham berlain) and bhandagarika
(in charge o f provisions) also figure as governm ental officers.
T o begin with, let us be fam iliar with the m aterial base of lineage based state. (See
also Unit 9.4.4). It was no( just consolidation o f the lineage power in term s of
political power. M uch m ore than that was the factor o f landholding. O ne gets the
im pression o f som e sort o f land grabbing on the part o f the members o f ruling
families. The exercise o f im portant governm ental functions was gradually being
linked up with landholding. Thus, under the rule of the G urjara Pratiharas we
find references to estates held by chiefs o f the C haham ana, G uhila and C halukya
clans. M athanadeva, an o th er chief of the G urjara P ratih ara lineage also claimed to
have obtained his allotm ent assvabhogavapta (own share). The N adol plates of
R ajaputra K irtipala dated in 1161 refer to a group of twelve villages which a junior
prince had received from the reigning prince. The Kalvan plates o f Y ashovarm an (of
the tim e of the P aram ara King Bhojadeva) m entions a chief who had acquired a
royal charter o f 84 villages, obviously from his overlord (See also Unit 11.4.2). 33
Indian Polity In Its Regional Unlike the C hah am ana and G urjara P ratiharas, there seems to be som ew hat lesser
Variations : 8th To 13th Century frequency o f land grants based on clan consideration am ongst the P aram aras. But
the P aram ara records refer to m ore groups o f villages than is the case with the
C h aham ana records. G roups o f villages in units o f twelve or its m ultiples (12, 24, 36
etc.) an d even in units pf sixteen or its m ultiples have been m entioned in a t least
seven cases. A P a ram ara inscription o f 1017 refers to a stray exam ple o f district
com prising 52 villages, which does not fit in either in the pattern o f the multiples o f
twelve or in th at o f sixteen. But, it cannot be ascertained fully, w hether the clan
system of adm inistration covered the m ajor part of the P aram ara kingdom .
W hat is broadly labelled as sam anta system was not, however, a uniform category. It
included a wide range o f status all o f which corresponded to the landed aristocracy
o f the period.
The Kingdom s o f all the m ajor powers o f W estern and C entral India included the
territories which were under the control o f the feudatories who were know n under
the generic title of m andalika, but som etim es styled them selves as m aharajadhfraim
m ahamandalesvara, mahamandalikas, m ahasam antas and sam antas. T he most
im portant o f the feudatory princes o f the C haulukyas were the P aram aras o f Abu
and the C haham anas o f Jalo r; others o f m inor im portance being the M er King
Jagam alla and P aram ara Som esvara. Sim ilarly, a considerable portion of the
C h ah am an a state, especially in N adol and Jalo r, was held by landed interm ediaries
variously known as thakkurais, ranakas, and bhoktas, on the condition th a t they
supplied certain quotas o f soldiers when required by the overlord.
The categories o f feudatory chiefs under the Param aras consisted o f those officers
and princes ; *
i) who were rew arded by the King w ith land in consideration o f their valuable
services;
ii) w ho had built up their own principalities during the period o f aggrandisem ent
and acknow ledged the suprem acy of the prem ier line. (T o this category belonged
the Param aras o f Vajgada, an d the P aram aras o f K iradu),
iii) who had carved out their principalities by the force o f their ow n arm s in
defiance o f the central au th o rity during the difficult days o f the Param aras. (In
this category cam e the P aram ara M ahakum aras w ho used subordinate titles but
were for all practical purposes independent), and
iv) w ho were defeated alid forced to accept the suzerainty o f the P aram aras and
were given the status o f a vassal.
Big feudatory chiefs such as the P aram aras o f A rn b udam andala and the P aram ara
M ahakum aras enjoyed large am ount of internal autonom y. They could create their
own sub-feudatories and appoint their own officers. It was possible for feudatory #
chiefs also to d istribute their lands am ong their dependents. The thakkuras served
the feudatory chiefs in alm ost all the feudatory states under the P aram aras. The
feudatories could also assiign taxes, alienate villages an d exem pt certain people from
taxation. This practice o f granting land and its associated fiscal and adm inistrative
rights is called sub-infeudation. There is surprisingly sufficient evidence fo r this,
particularly under the Pratiharas. It was practiced both in the areas o f direct
P ratih ara control as well &s those under their vassals. Exam ples o f sub-infeudation
caused by service grants ih G jjjarat under C haulukyas are also know n. A subordinate
functionary, p robably a bania under B him adeva-Il, constructed an irrigation-w ell
and a w atering trough attached to it, and for their upkeep he granted certain plots o f
land to a m an o f Pragvatfi clan, probably a m erchant. The evidence for the i
prevalence o f sub-infeudation in the P aram ara kingdom does not seem to be clear.
Thus, in course of tim e the sam anta system encom passed a proliferating range of
designations and assum ed the characteristics of a hierarchical political form ation Western and Central India
represented by the ranks such as ranaka, rauta, thakkura, sam anta, m ahasam anta,
etc.
"the incidence o f grants to state officials vary from one region to another. To
i illustrate, while we h ear ab o u t half a dozen P a ra m ara official ranks, only a few of
them are know n to have received land g ran ts — none at least in*the eleventh
| century. But very large terrritories were granted to vassals and high officers under
| the C haulukyas o f G ujarat. C haulukya copperplates of 12 th -l3 th centuries and their
' com parison w ith the d a ta o f the Lekhapaddhati help us in stressing th at vassals and
high.officers gradually m erged into one another. In the I Ith to 12th centuries key
: officials were also being paid th ro u g h regular and exclusive taxes. Thus, the
pattakiias and dushtasadhyas o f the K alacuri kingdom and baladhipas o f the
C haham anas received such sustenance. Indeed som e C handella inscriptions o f the
late tw elfth an d early th irteen th century specifically enjoin the feudatories, royal
officials, forest officials, constables, etc. to give up their perquisites in the villages
transferred as gifts. T here a re also references to resum ption o f such rights.
The m ost im p o rtan t duty o f a feudatory prince was to help his suzerain against the
enem y. Som etim es th e feudatories conquered new territories for the suzerain or
b ro u g h t an o th er prince under the later’s vassalage. A n inscription seems to imply
th a t a t tlje accession o f a new King the feudatories swore loyalty to their new
overlord who confirm ed them in their possession. F eudatories are also said to have
paid trib u te to th eir overlord b o th in cash and kind. However, there was no hard
an d fast rule regarding the obligations o f the feudatory chiefs o f different categories.
The general relations betw een the overlord an d the feudatory depended upon the
circum stances an d relative strength o f the feudatory vis-a-vis his suzerain. The
feudatories under C haulukyas o f G u jarat such as the P aram aras of A bu or the
C haham anas o f N adol ruled over q uite extensive territories and had their own
systems o f ad m inistration.
Instability o f th e political conditions was partly the result o f the sam anta-feudatory
system. O ften the strength o f the feudatory bonds depended upon the personality o f
the overlord. O verlords w ho w ent on expeditions to distant lands had to entrust
som e o f their capable generals w ith the ad m in istratio n o f certain territories as
feudatory chiefs. The personal relations betw een the King and the subordinate, which
m ight have been stro n g enough to keep the territories together for a generation or
tw o, faded o u t in the course o f tim e a n d the feudatory chiefs tended to assert their
independence. O ften sam antas had no perm anent bonds and were prepared to
transfer their allegiance to a pow erful invader in retu rn for greater privileges.
Indian PoUtj In Its Regional Check Your Progress 3 .
Variations : Sth To 13th Century
11 ) \ In colum n A some term s from Lekhapaddhati are given and in B the
1 d epartm ents w ith which they were connected. M atch A and B. -
Ai . B . . ~
i ) ... Vyaya^karana a) C hief Secretariat
ii) Vyapara-karana b) A ccounts D epartm ent
: iii) Shri-karana c) D ept, in charge o f supervision o f trad e
iv) M andapika-karana d) D ept, in charge o f collection o f taxes
i
2) Discuss in about 10 lines the powers and functions o f the feudatory Chiefs.
From ab o u t the beginning of the eighth century there em erged a political set up in
W estern India an d C entral India in which new 'social groups acquired political p o w er
by various m eans such as settlem ent of new areas. T he pattern o f the emergence of
the R ajputs, which was partly clan based organization o f political authority, shows'
some deviations from developm ents outside W estern India. However, the m obility of
new powers tow ards kshatriya status for legitim ation was not specific to W estern
India as a sim ilar process was in operation elsewhere in early medieval India. A fter
seeking legitimacy for their new kshatriya role the ruling clans of W estern and
C entral India form ulated detailed geneologies in the period of their transition from
feudatory to independent status. They consolidated their political position by means
o f specific patterns o f land distribution and territo rial system. Sotfte o th er prom inent
features o f the polity in the region are :
• organisation o f bureaucracy which could connect different m odes in their political
structures m arked by different foci o r levels o f power,
• dom inance o f overlord-subordinate relations,
• landholding as an im portant com ponent o f the sam anta status,
• integration o f local polities into larger state polities, ,
• certain am o u n t o f land based ranking associated w ith politico-adm inistrative roles ,
and services, and , /
• wielding o f vast-adm inistrative and financial powers by vassals and officers to the
extent of sub-infeudation.
J6
Western and Central India
10.8 KEYWORDS
3) i) X “) V "' “ *) X iv) X
37
UNIT 11 THE DECCAN
Structure '
11.0 Objectives
11.1 In troduction ;
11.2 Identification of th e Region
11.3 F o rm ation o f Political A uthority : The H istorical B ackground
11.4 Em ergence and E xpansion o f Ruling Families
11.4.1 The Lineage and its Territory
11.4.2 The Patterns of the Emergence of Ruling Lineages
11.4.3 Fabrication of Genealogies
11.5 The Pow er Brokers .
11.6 Inter-Lineage N etw orks
11.7 Land and Integration o f D ispersed Foci and Levels of Pow er
11.8 The B ureaucratic Structure
11.9 Resource Base o f the S tate
11.10 Political Instability in the D eccan Polity
11.11 Let Us Sum Up
11.12 Key W ords
11.13 Answers to Check Y our Progress Exercises
11.0 OBJECTIVES___________ ■
________.________________
In this Unit we will know ab o u t the nature, organisation and distribution of power
in one select region— the Deccan. After studying this Unit you will be able to :
• understand the geographical spread o f th e D eccan, .
• list the m ajor and m inor powers th a t exercised their authority over different
territories o f the Deccan between the eighth and the th irteenth centuries,
• grasp the political processes of the form ation o f local pow ers and their integration
into the pow er structure beyond local bounds,,
' / '
• grasp the totality o f the differential distribution of power, and
• understand the n ature o f early medieval polity in th e Deccan.
11.1 INTRODUCTION
Keepi/ig in view the general trend o f political developm ents, specially the n atu re o f
polity in W estern and C entral India (U nit 10), the present Unit should be seen as a
com plem entary com ponent. Beginning w ith the historical genesis o f state society in
the times o f the M auryas, the Unit dem arcates im p o rtan t strands in th e political
stru ctu re in the Deccan during the early m edieval centuries. It attem pts to show the
operation o f such factors as lineage and land rights in the rise o f states. Also, the
social and econom ic bases o f political pow er are identified. Finally, it also highlights
the n atu re o f the integration o f plethora o f pow er levels.
The nam e D eccan apparently derives from the SansTcrit term ‘D akshina’ m eaning the
South. A s to th e exact limits of the region called the D eccan, the historical evidences
give divergent pieces of inform ation. Som etim es its correspondence is established
w ith-the whole o f peninsnlar India an d som etim es it is restricted to a p art thereof. In
its narrow est delim itation the Deccan is identified w ith M arathi speaking area an d
lands im m ediately adjoining it. But the term Deccan m ay be extended so as to cover
the whole o f India south o f the N arm ada. G enerally, it is understood as designating
a m ore lim ited territory in which M alabar and the Tam il regions of the extrem e
so u th are n o t included. S outhern India as distinguished from the plateau o f the The Deccan
D eccan (from which it is separated by the K rishna-T ungabhadra rivers) has a
ch aracter o f its own.
Thus lim ited, the term D eccan signifies the whole region occupied by the Telugu
speaking populations as well as M ah arash tra with certain parts o f northern
K arn atak a (K an n ad a speaking).
The Deccan was am o n g those nuclear regions which were covered by the state
society by as early as the M auryan period (third century B.C.). T he territorial
expansion o f the M auryas h ad resulted in a horizontal extension o f authority. The
M auryan control in the D eccan which was supervisory in natu re was exercised
th ro u g h the viceroys and a section Of the bureaucracy stationed in provincial
headquarters. The establishm ent o f provincial headquarters and the association of
the local chieftains in a subord in ate position saw the emergence o f a ruling elite after
the retreat o f the M auryan a u th o rity from the D eccan. These local elite groups
consolidated them selves, ascended to pow er and established ruling houses after the
disintegration o f the M auryan power. The process was particularly m arked during
the Satavahanas. They evolved a system o f governm ent in which vice-royal functions
were assigned to the local chieftains conquered by them and assim ilated into their
pow er structure. T he S atav ah an a adm inistrative units which were placed under the
supervision o f the functionaries draw n from the clans o f local chiefs emerged later as
seats o f political au th o rity durin g the post-S atavahana period.
i)
ii) ...................................................................................................
iii)
39
Indian Polity In lt> Regional 3) W rite ten lines on the em ergence of the ruling elite in the D eccan in the post-
Variatkm : 8th To JM i Century M aurya period.
The crystallization o f the state had taken place over a m ajor p o rtion o f the D eccan
m uch before the eighth century. However, it does not m ean th a t there were no shifts
in the centres o f pow er and changes in the p attern o f the em ergence o f ruling
lineages. The em ergence of new ruling lineages was a continuous process.
A s elsewhere in India the inscriptions of the D eccan from the seventh century start
producing elab orate geneologies o f the ruling lineages. The inscriptions issued
between the eighth and the thirteenth centuries speak o f the em ergence o f several
m ajor and m inor ruling powers such as the R ashtrakutas, C halukyas, Silaharas,
K akatiyas, Sevunas (Y adavas), Hoysalas, etc.
The period in the D eccan was characterised not only by the emergence of the new
ruling lineages but also the branching off of the existing ones. Thus, ap art from the
m ain C halukyan house ruling from iBadami, there were collateral C halukya lines
ruling in various places such as Lata, Vengi as also a line bearing the C halukya '
nam e in vem ulavada. Individual m embers claim ing to belong to the C halukya kula
o r vamsha in different localities in K arnataka are also know n. Sim ilarly, a p a rt from
the m ain Sevuna lineage ruling from Devagiri, we hear o f a m inor Sevuna fam ily
ruling over a territorial division called M asavadi. We al$o hear of different branches
ruling in different localities bearing the nam e o f a particular line, as for exam ple, the
H aihayas o f M orata and A ralu, the K adam bas o f K aradikal, N urum bada, G oa,
H anagal, Banavase and Bandalike. The G angas and the N olam bas had throw n off
m any ju n io r branches. The branches o f a ruling line continued to be operative for
centuries even after the m ain line disappeared from the arena. A s an exam ple can be
cited the Vengi line o f the C halukyas, which was b rought into being by Pulakesin-II
o f the Badami C halukyas. The m inor branches of the G angas, the K adam bas and
others also outlived the m ain lines o f their respective families.
40
The changing distribution patterns of ruling lineages did not necessarily correspond The D caan
to static territorial units. F o r exam ple, the K alachuris w ho app ear in the sixth
century A .D . as the rulers o f a vast area com prising M alwa, G ujarat, K onkan,
M ah arash tra and V idarbha also established several nuclei o f pow er as in T ripuri
(near Jab alp u r) an d R atan p u r in the upper N arm ada basin. O ne o f their branches
ventured into a rem ote area o f Eastern India which came to be know n as Sarayupar.
A segm ent o f the K alachuri line m igrated to K arnataka. K alachuris o f K arnataka
claim to be the descendants o f the K alachuris o f central India.
Generally the em ergence o f a ruling lineage as a potentially dom inant political force
was from a local, often agrarian , base. The interpretation th a t the term Chaluki
resembles th e nam e o f an agricultural im plem ent would m ake one think th a t the
C halukyas were originally tillers o f the soil w ho took to arm s and founded a
kingdom subsequently. However, the em ergence o f the H oysalas who were the hill
chiefs of the forests was characterised not by their association with an agrarian base
but by their ability to com m and o th er hill forces and to use the political situation in
the plains to their advantage. -
Again, alth o u g h it is generally true th at the large state structures of India of the
early m edieval period thrived in potentially rich resource bases o r nuclear regions in
Ganges basin, Kaveri basin and K rishna-G odavari doab, the resource potential was
sought to be expanded. In this context it is notable th at O rugallu (W arangal), away
from the K rishna-G odavari doab, rem ained a base on which the large state structure
o f the K akatiyas was built. Before the tim e of the K akatiyas the tanks were small,
the irrigation facilities inadequate and the area of cultivation limited in extent. The
K akatiya kings like Beta-11, R ud ra, G anapathi, P ra tap ru d ra got several tanks built
in different p arts o f th eir kingdom . P ra ta p ru d ra tried to increase the extent of
cultivable land by cutting dow n forests and bringing large tracts under cultivation,
e.g. in th e R ayalaseem a area. A sim ilar m ovem ent o f the expansion o f arable lands
also characterised the early phase o f the em ergence o f the Hoysalas in the Southern
K afn atak a.
Orugallu Fort
A notable feature o f the process of the emergence o f ruling lineages in early medieval
D eccan is their attem pt to align their local roots with a mythical trad itio n o r trace
their descent from m ythical-heroic lineages. The R ashtrakutas and the Sevunas
profess to be descended from Yadu, a puranic hero. The H oysalas claimed descent
from the lunar race through th a t eponym ous hero Y adu and said they were the
Yadavas and Lords of the excellent city of D varavati, the legendary capital o f the
Y adava Prince K rishna. Similarly, while the spiritual guru of the K akatiya king
G anapatideva provided them with the Suryavam si K shatriya identity, a n inscription
of the king him self traces the geneology from a m ythical and legendary account of
M anu, IkShvaku, B hagiratha, R aghu, D ash arath a and Ram a.
Such claims are often dismissed on the ground th a t they were later inventions. It is
tru e th at such claims, freely draw ing their inspiration from m ythology and puranic
legends, lack historical accuracy as they refer to tim es for which no records exist.
But from the point o f view o f political processes the attem pts to claim descent in
solar or lunar lines assum e im portance because these claims sought to conceal rather
th an reveal the original ancestry. Hoysalas for instance were the hill chiefs who
gradually established their com m and over the rest o f the hill chiefs, m igrated to the
plains and established a nucleus of power. The K akatiyas were the s h u d r a s . Their
political power and “low origin” had to be reconciled by assum ing a higher status for
themselves. In other w ords the achievem ent of political dom inance was Sought to be
correlated with a corresponding social status. The Chalukyas o f K alyan, for exam ple,
sought this status by claim ing that their progenitor was born out of a handful
( C h u lu k a ) o f w ater taken by the Sage Bharadvaja i. e: D rona, or the w ater o f Ganga
poured out from the cavity o f his hands by A shvattham a, the son o f D rona. The
Kshatriya status was a sym bol o f legitim ation. T he new and upcom ing non- kshatriya The Deccan
groups sought to validate their political pow er th rough this. Hence the Yadu vam sha
cam e in very handy an d m ost lineages traced their descent from Yadu.
i
T heoretically the tem poral pow er was required to guarantee protection. A ccording to a
phrase (D ushta nigraha-Shishta pratipalana) which occurs constantly in the inscriptions
o f the Hoysalas in southern D eccan, a King’s duty was tw o-fold: to restrain the evil and to
protect th e good. T he phrase sum m arises ail the com m ands addressed to the king by the
d h arm ash astru. How ever, the protection did not simply m ean physical protection of
subjects. It also m eant the protection o f the social order. In fact, the danda or force was
intended by the priestly class not so m uch as a political expedient; it was intended m ore
fo r th e preservation o f the social order.
H ow ever, the state society was to cut across the barrier o f disparate dharm as or
oorm s if it were to spread horizontally. T he territorial spread of the brabmanas,
heads o f religious sects, institutions such as temples and the m athas which
represented som e kind o f a central focus to disparate norm s was therefore supported
by the early medieval states. There is an obvious em phasis on the m utuality of
interests of the ruling chiefs an d th e m en /in stitu tio n s of religion. In fact, the latter
were not only at the receiving end but also contributed to the sanctioning of the
au th o rity of rulers. F o rm atio n o f the ruling elite is quite evident. T hat accounts for
the territo rial m obility o f th e religious beneficiaries and massive support in the form
o f m unificent gifts o f gold and land m ade by the royalty and the nobility to them .
T here a re m any exam ples o f the brabmanas o f one province m oving freely to settle
in an o th er. W hile th e im m igrant brabmanas who received grants from the
R a sh tra k u ta kings included those from Vengi (A ndhra), P atalip u tra (Bihar),'
P u n d raw ard h an a (in Bengal) an d Kavi (G ujarat), those in the Sevuna kingdom
included brah m an as from central India a n d U ttar Pradesh. The kings identifying
themselves w ith a particu lar religious sect or cult, calling themselves as the param a-
maheshvaras, or param abhagavatas, an d even attrib u tin g their political rise to the
grace o f the divinities was not unknow n in the Deccan. F o r exam ple Taila-11, the
overthrow er of the R ash trak u tas believed th at it was the favour o f Jagadguru Ishvara
G halisasa, the head of a brahm adeya village, th at had secured him the throne.
M adhavavarm an, the founder o f the K akatiya fam ily, is said to have acquired an
arm y com prising th o u san d s o f elephants and lakhs of horses and foot soldiers by the
grace o f the goddess’ Padm aks hi. The benefactions o f some kings o f .the D eccan, for
exam ple K akatiya Prola-I and Beta-II seem to have been confined to the followers of
the Shaiva doctrine. There were also a few persecutions here and there.
An essential feature o f the early medieval polity in the Deccan was a m arked inter
relatedness o f the polities. No political unit or entity operated in isolation. M ilitary
activities o f the m ighty rivals for the hegem ony over the fertile-strategic lands would
render neutral existence o f the small pow ers impossible.
While ow ning real or nom inal allegiance to the overlord pow er, the sm aller polities
would conserve and consolidate their strength and resources.
In a polity of this nature, the m ore pow erful am ong the subordinate powers such as
the m ahamandaleshvaras were alw ays to be feared. T heir tendency to form alliances
against th e overlord o r to grow at the cost o f the other subordinates o f the overlord
needed to be checked. It is well-known how the C halukyas of Kalyan, who were the
feudatories of the R ash trak u tas, entertained political am bitions and declared 43
Indian Pottty In Its Regional independence realising the weakness o f the R ash trak u ta pow er structure during tne
Variations : 8th To 13th Century period of the successors of K rishna-Ill. In the m id-twelfth century the Sevunas, the
H oysalas and the K akatiyas utilised the C halukya— K alachuri struggle for their own
good a n d asserted their independence.
Despite these possibilities the intei -lineage relations could not be disregarded as they
proved extrem ely helpful in situations of the m ilitary exploits requiring m obilization
o f greater force. As exam ples can be cited the Hoysalas o f S outhern K arnataka
rushing to the aid o f their overlord C halukya Som eshvara-II. Similarly, the G angas
helped their R ash trak u ta overlords in capturing the fortified tow n C h a k ra k u ta in
Bastar in central India.
i) ................................................................................ ................................................................
ii) .................................................................................................................................................
iii) ..................................
iv) ................................................................................................................................................
2) Read the following and choose the right answer. M ark ( ) in the colum ns.
i) The patterns o f the emergence of the ruling lineages in the early medieval
Deccan shows th a t:
' a) only the Kshatriyas could wield political power
b) any clan or a larger ethnic group could m ake a bid for political power.
ii) The state encouraged the territorial spread o f the brahmanas and religious
institutions because:
a) it was deem ed to be an act of merit.
b) they posed a threat to the social order.
c) they represented some kind of uniform norm s.
d) the state society had to cut through the barrier o f disparate social norm s
if it were to spread horizontally.
An im portant point that needs to be noted with reference to the structure polities is
the phenom enon o f the dispersed distribution of power which was not specific to the
Deccan alone but was present in all m ajor political structures o f the early medieval
period.
These diverse or diffused foci and levels of pow er in the Deccan were represented by
w hat is called the S am anta-feudatory system. Tw o types of feudatory powers were
noticeable in the Deccan:
1) Those petty lineages which were integrated by an expanding polity into its power
structure by either reducing them to subm ission by m ilitary m anoeuvres or by
peaceful means.
2) Those which cam e to be created by the political powers by means of the grant of
landed estates as a reward for their help in some m ilitary exploit. However, these
latter were originally appointed only as governors o f an area with feudatory
privileges silch as the pancham ahashabdas (See also Unit 9.6). But the principle of
hereditary transm issions Of office tended to convert them in cousse of tim e into
full fledged feudatories. Most of the feudatory powers o f the larger polities were
such pre-existing lineages incorporated into their power structured. For exam ple,
when the R ashtrakutas started expanding their power, they had to deal with the
representatives o f the fam ous ruling lineages of the Deccan. A m ong their The Deccan
feudatories were the C halukyas of Vengi, Chalukyas of V em ulavada and many
individual petty chiefs. The feudatories of the Hoysalas, Sevunas and Kakatiyas
bore the names of the erstwhile lineages like the N olam bas, G angas, C halukyas,
K adam bas, A bhiras, H aihayas and so on.
Inter-m arriages into the families of the suzerain and subordinate served as the social
bases while the recognition o f the enjoym ent o f the landed estates by the local
powers served as the econom ic bases of the interlinked political process.
In strict political term s the use o f force was not unknow n especially when the local
powers stood in the way o f the expansion o f a lineage’s power. The territories of the
Nishad Boyas, a race of hardy w arriors who inhabited the region around Nellore
were sought to be integrated by m eans of involving their chief men into the
bureaucratic structure. But when the Boyas continued to offer resistance to the
advance o f the C halukya arips in the south, the King dispatched an arm y under
P andaranga w ith instructions to dem olish the strong-holds of the Boyas and to
subjugate their country. Sim ilarly, K akatiya R udra reduced to subm ission the K ota
chiefs.
Integration of dispersed foci o f pow er was not confined to the aw ard o f feudal ranks
such as nayaka, sam anta, sam anta-dhipati or m ahasam anta, mandalika,
m ahamandaleshvara, etc., but also extended to bureaucratic positions. Irrespective of
m ultiple form s of integration, it must be realised that the mechanics of integration
always did not w ork only in the direction of integration. Second, w hether it was
integration o r disintegration, land rights served a com m on feature. Local landlords
or chieftains perform ed the role of integrators when they derived their adm inistrative
a n d financial pow ers from tbeir overlords, paid tributes and perform ed various other
obligations to them . However, the same landlords became real breakers and wreckers
when they lorded over peasants and artisans unm indful o f overlords’ concern. T hey
acted as an au to n o m o u s pow er within their territory, even though the degree o f
au to n o m y varied from region to region. If the central governm ent became weak the
feudatories used to be practically independent; in such a situation they could exact
their own term s for su pporting the fortunes of their titu lar overlord. Their position
becam e still m ore strong if there was a w ar of succession. They could then take sides
an d try to put their nom inee on the im perial throne thus playing the role o f the king
m akers. O n such occasions they could settle their old scores by dethroning their
overlord and im posing their own term s on the new successor. R ashtrakuta D hruva,
A m oghavarsha-I an d A m oghavarsha-II owned their thrones to a considerable degree
to the support o f their feudatories.
In tHe R ash trak u ta gran t charters only the royal sign-m anual and the names of the
com poser of the gran t and the person who conveyed it to the grantees are found.
M inisters and secretaries are conspicuous by their absence. The assum ption o f a very 45
Indian Potty in Its Regional big secretariat a t their capital is not supported by any inform ation ab o u t the m anner
Variations:8th To 13thCentury in w hich th e daily business o f adm inistration was carried on at the capital. A lthough
a body o f high ranking officers and m inisters lcnown as amatyas o r mantris existed
in th e capital to assist the King the questions regarding the size, constitution and
position o f a regular council o f m inisters, if any, have not been satisfactorily
answ ered. In the capital and in provincial headquarters in the R ash trak u ta
adm in istratio n the revenue records, records bearing upon land ow nership and
original drafts o f copperplate grants were carefully preserved.
In the areas directly adm inistered by the officers o f the state, the provincial
governors (Rashtrapatis) enjoyed considerable pow er over their subordinates in the
provinces. Som e o f the provincial governors were royal princes. The provinces which\
are said to have been adm inistered by the princes an d queens in the later C halukya
adm inistration ap pear to have been those bestowed upon them as their personal fief.
Som e others were appointed as governors in recognition o f their distinguished
m ilitary services. Petty offices like those o f the supervision over small units
consisting o f 10 or 12 villages very often went tp relatives o f the provincial
governors.
Provincial governors and district level governors in the R ash trak u ta adm inistration
were assisted by a body o f assistants called the R ashtram ahattaras and
Vishayamahattaras respectively. But very little is know n ab out their powers, m odes
o f election, meetings etc. Their powers m ust have been considerably less th an those
o f the village councils which were m ade up o f the rural elite.
, The n atu re o f the office o f the village headm en and divisional headm en, the revenue
officers who helped the state officers of the sub-divisions shows th a t these officials
were often rem unerated for their services in the form o f hereditary rent free fields.
The integration o f dispersed foci o f pow er also expressed itself in the absorption o f
the m em bers o f local lineages into the bureaucratic structure. In the R ash trak u ta
structure, the district and provincial governors and lower officers like Vishayapatis
enjoyed feudatory status and were allowed to use feudatory titles. A pparently they
were the descendants of the local kings who were once independent but were
subsequently conquered by the im perial powers. In such cases they seem to have
continued as th e governm ent’s officers.
The m ain source o f the state incom e was agricultural tax atio n . P rivate individuals
holding arable lands paid to the state the land tax w hich form ed the backbone o f its
revenue. The cultivators were also subject to some additional im posts called the
Upgkriti. Upakriti and Kanika seem to refer to a kind o f custom ary tax levied by the
governm ent on villagers and tow nsm en in return for som e service perform ed for their
benefit by the kings or their officers.
L and taxes were assessed b oth in kind and cash. In the K akatiya kingdom the taxes
in kind were generally paid in tw o instalm ents in the m onths of Kartika and
Vaishakha, the tw o m ain crop seasons. Under the R ashtrakutas they could be paid
' in three instalm ents in Bhadrapada, K artika and M agha, the king’s officers went
rourfd the villages to collect his share o f the grain from them . The S ta te ’s share o f a
householder’s incom e was also collected in kind.
Land was divided into dry, wet and garden lands for purposes o f assessm ent in
accordance w ith the natu re and fertility o f the soil. P art o f the state incom e cam e
from the pastures and forests, the ow nership o f which was claim ed by the state. It
also claim ed ow nership in mines, hidden treasures, waste lands, orchards on State
lands, lakes an d public wells.
O ther im portant source o f state income included custom s, excise duties and charges
levied on trad e and industry. Sunkamu or Sunka, a term used in this context was o f
b ro a d im port an d denoted duties on exports and im ports excise duties and custom s
duties collected .on articles o f m erchandise brought to and taken from m arket tow ns.
In the-K akatiya system the tolls collected on articles o f trade were farm ed~out to
m erchant associations comprlSffig m embers of the trading com m unity on paym ent of
46 a flxed ^ .T . U th e governm ent. ■
R egular offerings and tributes by the feudatory chiefs com prised another source of The Deccan
the incom e o f the state. A R ash trak u ta inscription refers to a n occasion when King
G ovinda-III toured ab o u t in the southern p arts of the em pire to collect the tributes
due from his feudatories. Special presents were exacted from the feudatory chiefs on
the occasions o f festivities in the im perial household.
State society even in nuclear areas did not necessarily have a stable locus.
M obilization o f m ilitary strength could displace existing pow er holders and create
new locus an d netw orks of political relatipns. We have already npted the
decentralised character p f the state w ith different fpci p f ppw er. The shifting
allegiances p f the diffused fpci of ppwer, e.g. thpse represented by the subprdinate
chiefs p r samanta- feudatories, would add tp political instability.
3) W rite in ten lines ab o u t the integration o f the dispersed foci o f pow er into the
state society.
to "ST
r . NARMADA.
r ja p t i
N A l^ l Av'PARNAKHETA
u
aCHANDRADITYAPURA V
— NIVS1£ .SINDINERA a' CHANDA
VX** * asangam n
BASSEIN : v a i T P ! ^ IR! L __ ^ *
-15
-1 0
12.0 OBJECTIVES
12.1 INTRODUCTION
This is the last Unit concerning regional variations of early medieval polity. It deals
with S o u th India, which broadly covers the portion of the peninsula lying south of
13° N orthern L atitude. It begins with the emergence of the Pallavas in the sixth
century o f the C hristian era an d ends with the establishm ent o f the Tam il m acro
region as a regional state with distinctive politico-cultural features under the Cholas
(ninth-thirteenth centuries). A fter analysing the m ajor lines of enquiry the Unit seeks
to dem arcate'v ario u s tiers of adm inistration. These tiers have been identified with a
distinct focus on th eir social and econom ic bases. The nature of resource
m obilisation and ap p aratu s to regulate it have also been sketched. Finally, the
ideological su p p o rt of the S outh Indian polity has been suggested.
Indian Polity In Its Regional
Variation* : M To 13th Century 12.2 THE REGION
H ere S outh India refers to the region called Tam il N adu, n ot in its present form as a
linguistic state, but as a m acro-region, which evolved from the seventh to the
thirteenth centuries and a t tim es extended into parts of S o u th K arnataka, southern
A n d h ra and S outh K erala. This region may be divided into various zones, which had
a long historical evolution, viz., the core and subsidiary zones in the plains, on the
basis o f its river systems and a secondary zone located in its north-w estern parts
m arked by the u p th rusting eastern ghats and the edges o f the plateau leading to
K arn atak a a n d K erala. These zones represented different politico-cultural regions,
which were know n as mandalams from the C hola period onw ards. The geography o f
the whole region determ ined to a large extent the nuclei o f the regional polities
which emerged during the centuries under discussion.
The post-G upta history o f India is dom inated by the evolution o f a num ber of
regional polities. Som e o f them emerged as regional states (O rissa and T am il N adu)
coinciding with regional cultures. O thers were sm aller polities located as buffers
between larger ones. This is well illustrated by the larger polities of S o u th India such
as those o f the Pallavas o f K anchipuram and the Pandyas of M adurai in Tam il
N ad u (sixth to ninth centuries A. D ). Dispersed between these larger ones were
several sm aller pow ers such as the W estern G angas, K adam bas, Banas and a host of
others, owing allegiance alternatively to the larger lineages o f the Deccan (See also
Unit 1 1.4) and Tam il plains o r occasionally establishing their independence. The
m ost powerful o f these regional polities was, however, th at o f the C holas (ninth to
thirteenth centuries),w ho with the Kaveri Valley as the nucleus o f their power,
succeeded in establishing their territorial sovereignty covering the whole o f the Tam il
m acro-region. The C holas were able to establish.a regional state w ith its distinctive
politico-cultural features.
T here are three different perspectives on th e Tam il regional polity. The pioneering
works on S outh Indian polity in general and Tam il polity in particular showed a
direct concern w ith adm inistrative institutions an d their history and were devoted to
the study o f institution^ like kingship, brahmadeya with its sabha and the tem ple,
their organisation and functions. They neither adopted a viable fram ew ork o f
analysis n o r an integrated approach to study the political processes a n d their '
linkages w ith th e socio-econom ic organisation. In short, they treated polity in
isolation from society and econom y. They were also influenced by im perialistic
notions o f the state and em pire, centralised m onarchies and pow erful bureaucracies.
T h e ir assum ptions were th a t all the know n features of a m odern state were prevalent
in th e earlier periods. .
New perspectives on polity have been provided by m ore recent works, which
em phasise the need for understanding the inter-connections between social
form ation, econom ic organisation and political structures. They focus on the
processes o f evolution dnd change, leading to the em ergence o f regional polities and
the role o f institutions such as the brahmadeya and the tem ple in the form ation of
political structure. A s a result, the theory o f the centralised state followed by the
conventional studies has been seriously questioned. As an alternative, the.concept of
the segm entary state has been used to characterise the medieval S outh Indian state.
The main difference betw een these tw o perspectives is based on the nature of local
organisations, the degree o f their autonom y and th e extent of central control or
direct political control Exercised by the ruling dynasties over the different zones of
the Tam il region. The first view assigns greater and m ore effective control to the
central authority over all regions, despite the existence o f local initiative and
auto n o m y (w hat they called “local self governm ent”) while the second view rejects it
as contradictory and assigns a high degree of autonom y to the local Organisations
52 a n r i fl m p r p r i t u a l c n v p r ^ i o n t v t n th<» n i l i n o H v n a c t v <»Yr<*nt in t h A r n r p o r o o .
As against both these extrem e views, the studies o f the C hola state, based on a South India
careful statistical analyses o f the rich inscriptional d ata, provide a third perspective
suggesting the need fo r m odifications o f b o th the above views. They show the
developm ent o f a centralised polity from an earlier stage o f independent peasant
regions controlled by peasant assemblies. These peasant regions were integrated
through various institutions an d through the introduction o f innovative
adm inistrative m easures by a political au thority. The zenith o f the C hola pow er was
reached in the eleventh century, which also m arked the crystallization o f a
centralised polity.
The P allava an d P an d y a dynasties aspired for control over the Kaveri Valley, the
m ost fertile and well irrigated agricultural core o f the Tam il region. They also set in
m otion a process o f ag rarian expansion and integration th ro u g h the brahm adeya and
the tem ple, which helped to integrate the agrarian or peasant u n its called the nadus
(also kurram s) (see also Units 1.2.2 an d 1.3).
The nadu, although it evblyed as a kinship based agrarian unit, show s the prevalence^
o f a variety o f collective controls over production. This is seen in the kahi rights or
hereditary rights in land which were transferable by.sale or donation. Various
categories o f rights in land existed and were determ ined and enjoyed w ithin the
norm s accepted by the contem porary organisations o f the brahmadeya, non-
brahmadeya(ur) settlem ents and the family.
In the earlier conventional approach, the nadu received only m arginal atten tio n anc
its significance was tost in such studies. In view o f the segm entary .state, a high
degree of auto nom y is assigned to the nadu as a segment and hence the medieval
S outh Indian state is characterised as a segm entary and peasant state. H 9 wever, the
nadu cannot be studied independently of the other institutions. In reality, the nadu
brahm adeya and the tem ple together m ark the. phased opening o f the Tam il plains.
W ith the recognition o f the nadu as the basic unit o f agrarian organisation, the older
r
theory o f the unchanging village com m unities has lost its validity. The debate now South IikM*
centres on the degree o f nadu autonom y and the stability of the natter organisation
and hence also on the validity o f the segm entary state concept.
The Sabha o r the assem bly o f the brahm ana landow ners grew into a m ore prom inent
institution vis-a-vis the Ur, the assem bly o f a non-brahmadeya settlement. The
grow ing m aturity of the Sabha is illustrated by the fam ous U ttaram erur (Chingleput
district), a m ajor brahmadeya and tan-kuru o f the eighth to thirteenth centuries as
well as by M an u r (Tirunelveli district), an im portant brahmadeya o f the eighth and
ninth centuries. The tan-kuru had a central function also and often had under its
purview several o th er centres o f agricultural and craft production. The brahm anical^'.
tem ple, which was invariably the nucleus o f m any o f these settlements, was also
u nder the supervision o r direct control o f the Sabha, which functioned through
various com m ittees called variyams.
12.6.3 Valanadu
Revenue surveys and assessm ent of land revenue were systematically undertaken
under the Cholas in the eleventh century. In the process, new and larger revenue
units were form ed by grouping som e nadus together and even by partitioning som e ’
under different valanadu-s. This was determ ined by their irrigational needs and heriCe )
valanadu-s had consciously chosen boundaries such as w ater courses. The valanadu
was an artificial unit and a politico-econom ic division created by the will o f a
political authority. The valanadu-s were nam ed after the kings who created them.
Their organisation was also linked with the establishm ent o f a hierarchy o f officers
an d a departm ent of revenue collection, which kept detailed records o f revenues.
This departm ent (the puravu-vari-tinaikkalam) was the m ost impressive o f the
idm inistrative m achinery evolved by the C holas for m obilisation o f resources.
A netw ork o f nagarams emerged between the n inth an d tw elfth centuries. The royal
and political centres as well as larger com m ercial centres such as K anchipuram and
T hanjavur were designated as managarams o r great nagarams. This netw ork was
further brought into a wider inter-regional exchange due to the revival o f S outh
Asian trad e by the tenth century involving S outh India, Sri L anka, S outheast Asia
and C hina. The Cholas prom oted this trade by undertaking m aritim e expeditions to
Sri L anka and Sri Vijaya (S um atra) a n d sending trad e missions to C hina. They
extended their patronage to their m erchant organisations by issuing royal charters
for establishing m ercantile towns protected by m ercenaries. W arehouses'and
distribution centres knpw n as erivirappattana interacted w ith the nagaram as well as
o ther sm aller localised m erchant organisations like the manigramam an d foreign
m erchant organisations like the Anjuvannam. They traded in luxury goods, exotic
items from o th er countries an d in S o u th Indian textiles. They also obtained in
exchange agricultural products from the Chittirameli Periyanadu. The Chittirameli
was an organisation o f agriculturists belonging to all the “fo u r castes” (caturvarnya).
It originated in the Tam il region, and extended their activities into S o u th K arnataka
and southern A ndhrd regions in the tw elfth century.
' /
'i y How brahmadeya becam e m ore im portant?
r--
3) H ow th e tem ple cam e to occupy significance in polity?
12.7 TAXATION
T he existence o f a regular tax atio n system, which the segm entary state concept
denies, is indicated by a statistical analysis o f tax term s in C hola inscriptions. The
m ajor land tax called kadammai was uniform as also m any other sm aller ones
related to land. T here was a system o f storage a n d transfer o f revenue from the
locality to the governm ent a t the valanadu, nadu and ur levels. Taxes, b o th central
and local, have been identified. Increase in non-agricultural taxes over tim e has also
been recognised. Local official involvem ent in ta x collection also increased. Local
form s o f collection a n d re-investm ent in regional econom y avoided problem s of
central collection an d redistribution. The state's active interest in trad e and
com m ercial ventures provided a second resource base. Royal ports were consciously
developed an d tolls were levied by royal agents. E xem ption from tolls also formed
p a rt o f the policy o f encouragem ent o f trad e ventures.
12.8 BUREAUCRACY
The C hola, state was viewed as a highly bureaucratised one by the pioneering
scholars. This is denied by the follow ers of the segm entary state theory. Statistical
d a ta from inscriptions, how ever, have been used to show the existence of officers at
I
Indian Polity In Its Regional b o th central and local levels. The term adhikari prefixed to nam es o f im portant
Variations : 8th To 13th Century personages with the M uvenda vejan title indicates the presence o f a bureaucracy
especially in the hierarchically structured revenue departm ent. R anking am ong
officers is also show n by the term s perundaram (higher grade) arid sirutmram (lower
grade), both in the ‘civil’ and ‘m ilitary’ establishm ents. Officers a t the royal court
(udan kuttam ) and officers touring the country (vidaiyil adhikari) are also known.
The King’s governm ent was present in the localities through a hierarchy of
officers — the m andalamudali, nadu vagai and madhyastha acting as im portant links
between the King and the locality.
' ' i
. . '
The C hola genealogies are m ore com plex in their ideological claims. A part from the
solar lineage, the Cholas directly linked themselves with the “S angam ” Cholas, the
58 Kaveri region and the tem ple building activities of their ancestors for legitim ating
their claims to sovereignty. Above all, they adopted and prom oted in a significant South' India
way the bhakti ideology of the Tam il V aishnava and Saiva saints by popularising it '
thro u g h tem ple building, tem ple rituals and iconography. The symbolism o f the
tem ple, equated w ith territo ry /co sm o s considerably enhanced royal power. The ritual
and political dom ains coincided which shows further lim itations o f the idea of
segm entary state (for a critical evaluation o f this idea, see also Unit 8.3).
59
Indian Polity In Its Regional 1-------------
1
Variations : 8th To 3th Century 12.13 KEY WORDS
Right Hand and Left Hand : A vertical division o f the arm y into
R ight and Left H and groups
2) The peasant organisations and their influence were the m ain features o f agrarian
society. Also See Sec. 12.5.
3) T hrough large donations and grants tem ples becam e im portant. W ith the help o f
the temples C holas could intervene in local affairs and tem ples becam e the
60 symbol o f royal authority. See Sub-sec. 12.6.4. •' '
4) Nagrama cam e into existence to fulfil the exchange requirem ents as m arket South India
centres. In due course thro u g h inter-regional and S outh Asian trade they became
very im p o rtan t. See Sub-sec. 12.6.5.
2) The C holas evolved the adm inistrative zones (mandalam). These were generally
placed under princes. Chieftains were also governed through well established
norm s. See Sec. 12.10.
61