A) Drainage Report Including Road Layout and Drainage Layout B) Parking Layout

ANNEX 9
a) Drainage report including road layout and drainage

layout
b) Parking layout
YIHAI INVESTMENT LTD
PAILLES SMART CITY
DRAINAGE REPORT
March 2018
Prepared by:
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
Yihai Investment Ltd, hereinafter referred to as the project promoter, is causing the construction
of a mixed-use development under the Smart City Scheme at Les Guibies, Pailles. It is located
within the boundaries of the Municipal City Council of Port Louis. The project would be known
as “Yihai Garden Smart City”.
The planning of the proposed project rests on a mixed-use development which offers a range of
residential, commercial, office and business hotel components harmoniously integrated so that it
adheres to the live, work and play concept. The site aggregates a total area of 411, 761 m2. The
“Domaine Les Pailles” forms part of the site earmarked for the proposed project. The site is
readily accessible to all parts of Mauritius, given that access to and from the site would be
principally via the new Port Louis ring road.
1.2 THE PROJECT
The Smart City shall contain among others, residential apartments, residential villas, business
hotel development, retail outlets and shops, offices, pre-primary and primary school, and leisure
amenities including a casino, a sports club, a wellness centre, as well as bars, cafés and
restaurants. This development would also be provided by a potable water supply network, a
power supply network, and street lighting as part of the basic amenities. The services would be
buried in trenches. The facilities would meet with the specifications of the Government agencies
and Local authorities.
The whole concept aims at making a judicious use of the land resource within the context of its
location. There would be plenty of green spaces that would be landscaped with appropriate
plants.
The project will be developed in a phased manner as displayed in Table 4.1: -
Page | 2
Table 4.1: Development type
Development Type Plot Size (m2) No. of blocks

Phase 1
Apartment 91,112.96 42 apartment blocks
Duplex 4,728.69 3 duplex blocks
Villa 18,008.92 15 blocks
School, office and hotel 16,836.69 1 pre-primary & primary
school
1 office building
1 business hotel with 300
rooms, casino, meeting
rooms and restaurants
Others (waste management 33,768.39 … retail outlets
building, commercial, Clos St ... food & beverage
Louis and wellness centre) outlets
spa, gym and yoga kiosk
Phase 2
Apartment 49,731.00 23 apartment blocks
Duplex - 37 duplex blocks
Residential villa - 6 villas
Green areas and Recreational 11,676.22
area
Restaurant 6,397.22
A master plan with contour lines enclosed in ANNEX 3 shows the components of the proposed
Smart City undertaking.
Page | 3
1.3 PROJECT SITE LOCATION
The project is located in the Northern West part of Mauritius, at Pailles. The location of the site
within the local context is shown in Figure 1 below.
SITE
Figure 1: Project Site Location (Extract: Google Map)
Page | 4
1.4 SITE CONSTITUTIONAL JURISDICTION
The site is located in the District of Port Louis as shown in Figure 2 below:
SITE
Figure 2: Project Site Location - Jurisdiction
1.5 The Site Description

The project extends on 411, 761 m2 ofland at Guibies, and is about 3km south of Port Louis.
The site includes the existing Domaine Les Pailles but extending also further towards the
sloping ground of the Seneque Peak located to the south (Figure 3). The project site is crossed
by the Ring Road to Port Louis, a dual carriageway with a roundabout linking to Swami
Vivekananda International Conference Centre.
Page | 5
Figure 3: Extract from Topographical Map of Mauritius, 1:25,000
Many large properties surround the village of Les Guibies, including Le Grand Casino du
Domaine Ltée, Domaine Les Pailles Ltd, Ste Sando & Co, Guibies Properties Ltd and Cie
Mauricienne d’Hippodromes.
The portion of land located downstream the Ring Road is relatively flat, at an average elevation
of about 75 to 85m above mean sea level (amsl). The upper part of the property corresponds to
the foothills of the Moka Range of Mountains, locally represented by Seneque Peak, Junction
Peak, Berthelot Peak and Guiby Peak (Figure 3). A copy of the topographical plan is attached in
Annex 3 (Drawing no: 18/VCEL/PSC/EIA/03).
For better description, the project site has been divided into five sections as shown in the Figure
below:
Page | 6
Figure 4: Division of project site
SECTOR 1
Sector 1 has a relatively flat topography with a gentle slope towards Ruisseau St Louis, which
passes downstream of it. There is a watercourse which passes through Section 1 as shown in
Figure 5 below. The watercourse emerges from the existing cut off drain Swami Vivekananda
International Centre (SVICC) and flow through the portion of land before discharging into
Ruisseau St Louis.
Figure 5: Culvert across access leading to Clos St. Louis
Page | 7
The water often causes ponding during heavy downpours and thus, may subsequently affect the
development areas. It has been proposed to divert the watercourse outside the project site in
quest to avoid any water accumulation issues (Refer to drawing No 18/VCEL/PSC/EIA/04).
The water course would be connected to Ruisseau St Louis at another location along the main
road leading to SVICC as shown below:
Figure 6: Ruisseau St Louis section near SVICC access Road
The following pictures are specific points along Sector 1.
Figure 7: Section 1 Boundary Road
Page | 8
Figure 8: Ruisseau St Louis section at Section 1 Drain Network Discharge
Currently, Sector 1 of the project site consists principally of Clos St Louis and its premises,
Restaurants, Domaine des Pailles, their parking areas and other green spaces.
Figure 9: Current Section 1 site preview
Page | 9
Figure 10: Clos St Louis Building
SECTOR 2
Sector 2 consists mainly of the Premises of Swami Vivekabanda International Convention

Centre (SVICC).
Figure 11: SVICC view
Along the periphery of SVICC, there is an existing boundary cut-off drain of size approximately
2.0 m deep and 1.0 m wide. The cut-off discharge at two ends, one as illustrated above near the
culvert along the access road to Clos St Louis and the second one on the other side of SVICC
Page | 10
which connects into Ruisseau St Louis through double pipe culverts and trench canals as
shown in the Figure below:
Figure 12: Double pipe Culvert from SVICC Cut off drain
SECTOR 3
Sector 3 corresponds to the area comprised between the access road to the CWA Tank at the
East, SVICC at the South and Clos Saint Louis at the West, located between + 100 m and + 70
m contour lines AMSL. The area has a relatively high slope towards the western direction (Clos
St Louis).
Figure 13: Road found along the eastern boundary of sector 3
Page | 11
Figure 14: Telecom pole
There are some abandoned site offices utilised for Ring Road Phase 1 construction. The
project site northern boundary is delimitated by a masonry wall, restraining the catchment area
of Sector 3.
On the hydrogeological and geotechnical investigations, water accumulation has been found
relatively high on the slope, at about 25m downstream from the telecom tower, contributing to a
path of wet soil as illustrated in the Figure 15 below:
Figure 15: Water accumulation in Sector 3
Page | 12
SECTOR 4
Figure 16: Left Hand side- Sector 4
Sector 4 is located between the Ring Road and the access road to CWA Tank (Behind SVICC).
This portion is relatively steep. It is found downstream of a Road Cut having an average height
of around 10.0 m. Downspouts have been found along the Ring Road, which diverges water into
Sector 4. No hydrological features have been found in this sector. In the proposed drain
network, part of the runoff will be diverted into the cut off drain around the SVICC and part will
be directed into the new proposed drain network located in Sector 3.
SECTOR 5
Figure 17: View of Sector 5 at SVICC Round about

Page | 13
Sector 5 corresponds to the portion of the project site located upstream from the Ring Road,
consisting of a gentle to steeper slope when proceeding towards the East. It is located between
Contour lines +330 m and + 105 m AMSL. It is situated on the foothills of the Moka Range of
Mountains, locally represented by Seneque Peak, Junction Peak, Berthelot Peak and Guiby
Peak.
It has a relatively steep slope. From observations and consultations with local inhabitants,
during heavy rainfall, high volume of run offs s from the mountain peaks. Additionally, the river
source of Ruisseau St Louis is located in Sector 5.
Figure 18: Lowest boundary of Sector 5
Near the lowest boundary of Sector 5 of the project site, there exists an access road which is
crossed by Ruisseau St Louis at around 120 m from the Ring Road.
Figure 19: View of Sector 5 from South West Direction

Page | 14
In the northern direction of Sector 5, the project site is located above a deep rock cut of a very
considerable height.
1.5.2 Site Geology

The island of Mauritius is of Volcanic Origin and the geology is largely dominated by the
volcanic events. From a geological perspective the site in question is located between valleys of
Seneque, Anse Courtois and Les Guibies Sector Mountains. The formation is mostly from the
intermediate lava series. The zone nearer to the mountain side have formations such as Old
Breccia Series and Old Lava Series.
SITE
Figure 20: Site Geology

(Source: carte Geologique de L’Ile Maurice-Loic Giorgi)
Old Breccia corresponds to the oldest materials known on the island (from 10 to 8Myr) and are
generally found at the foothills of most of the mountains. ranging from very competent volcanic
breccia with amorphous matrix to very weak completely weathered materials.
Page | 15
Old Lava corresponds to the main mountain ranges of the island, forming the remnants of the
eroded walls of the caldeira.
Intermediate Lava Series, dated between 3.5 to 1.7Myrs old, correspond to the stage where the
inner part of the caldeira has been filled, but also the valleys that have been formed during the
1.5Myrs rest period. The uppest part of the Intermediate Lava Series is generally made of a
thick clay layer than can reach up to 30m in some places.
1.5.3 Soil Type
The soil type for this project consists mainly of low Humic Latosol of the Richelieu Family and to
a minimum extent Latosolic Brown soil. Lithosol soil (with bedrocks) is also found especially in
the mountain ranges.
As per Trial pits, Top soils encountered are made of firm reddish-brown gravelly clay with
rootlets, with sub-angular to rounded gravels of moderately strong brownish grey weathered
basalt. Colluvium was also found, which is a general name for loose, unconsolidated sediments
that have been deposited at the base of hillslopes by either rainwash, sheetwash, slow
continuous downslope creep, or a variable combination of these processes. There is also some
Aluvium deposits which constitute a layer that does not exceed 3m thickness, close to St Louis
stream.
SITE
Figure 21: Soil Map of Site
Page | 16
1.5.4 Ground Water
The site is normally located approximately between 70 and 330 m AMSL (Ref Map of Mauritius
1: 25,000). During the geological investigations, 25 Trial pits of depth ranging between 1.0 m
and 3.0m were excavated. However, no Groundwater were found during excavation.
Page | 17
1.5.5 Water bodies and Existing drainage system
Tributary Ruisseau St Louis

found in Les Guibies Region
Site location
Ruisseau St
Louis
Figure 22: Water Courses near Project Site
(Re. 1:25000 contour map prepared by the Ministry of Housing and Lands)
With reference to 1:25000 map prepared by the Ministry of Housing and Lands and site
observations, Ruisseau St Louis watershed starts on the western side of Sector 5 of the project
site. Its source may be situated in Sector 5.
Cut-off drains have been proposed to avoid sheet flow into Sector 5 of the project area from the
peaks of the Mountain Range. Downstream, it is situated at a significant distance and will not be
a concern during heavy downpours and over flooding.
On the other side of the Mountain range, in the region of Anse Courtois-Guibies, there is a
tributary of Ruisseau St Louis, which would serve as discharge point for the top cut-off drain
along sector 5.
In sector 1 and 2, there is a culvert present on the access road leading to Clos St Louis which
serves to divert part of the runoffs from SVICC cut off drains into Ruisseau St Louis. The
remaining runoffs from the other side of SVICC surrounding cut-off drain passes through a
double pipe culvert near SVICC Round about (Ring Road), before discharging into Ruisseau St
Louis.
All proposed drain networks along Sector 1,2,3 and 4 would discharge their run offs at a point
downstream of Ruisseau St Louis.
Page | 18
1.5.7 Site hydrology
With reference to the Hydrological Map of Mauritius, developed by the Water Resources Unit,
the site is located in the catchment zone X which has an area of 13.7 km2. On the site, the main
discharge point for the run-off generated after a storm event flows is Ruisseau St Louis and its
Tributary found in Anse Courtois and Guibies Region. The steep topography in Sector 4 and 5
generates water flow.
The locus in question is mainly a residential development and with building and infrastructural
footprints aggregating approximately 30% of the land area. Consequently, the soil permeability
would get reduced and hence generating greater run-off. The site does not have much canopy
and interception is negligible. The soil permeability is apparently reduced by the soil type which
is of clayey type and basaltic outcrop in the higher lands. Therefore, the run-off generated has
low percolation at ground level and as such it would flow overland rapidly under high rainfall
intensities.
1.5.8 Rainfall Intensities

Pailles is found in North West of Mauritius. The annual precipitation for the site is about
1200mm. However, cyclonic and torrential rains could reach an intensity of 200mm a day.
SITE
Figure 23: Isoyetal Map of Mauritius (Courtesy: Meteorological Services)
The rainfall intensities recorded over the recent years have shown a change in rainfall pattern.
Rainfall season appears to have shifted. High intensity rainfall over short duration has been
Page | 19
frequently observed. Rainfall intensities of 250mm/h are becoming more and more frequent and
mostly attributed to the phenomenon of Climate Change. National Strategies and Policies have
been developed to address these events as well as adapt to the situation.
1.5.9 Return Periods

The choice for the return period is mainly dictated by the probability of occurrences of high
intensity rainfalls over number of years of observation and statistical trends. As for Mauritius,
occurrences of high intensities rainfall have been observed only over the last 5 years and as
mentioned hitherto this has been largely attributed to Climate Change. The statistical data also
show that drought periods are recurrent. The amount of rainfall has also known much variation
with frequent occurrences of high intensity rainfalls over short duration. The Meteorological
Services have processed rainfall data records for the island and proposed intensities curve that
respond to rainfall characteristics. The choice of the return periods is mainly dictated on the long
term rainfall data for that region and also by the financial impacts. The higher the return period
the higher would be the investment cost.
Considering the potential degree of damage to the road and adjacent properties, potential
hazard and inconvenience to the public, and the construction cost of the hydraulic structure for
this particular site, a 25-year return period has been used for design of the drainage system.
2.0 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT
Surface water that would be generated need to be addressed in a rational and sustainable
manner and that would not impact on land and the neighbourhood nor on existing infrastructure.
The site to be developed does not have a homogeneous catchment area. As mentioned above,
it could be subdivided into 5 main drainage zones. Hence, the mitigation measures would be
addressed initially at the zones level and ultimately at the global level.
The design rationale for the proposed mitigation incorporates the principles of sustainable
development for the enjoyment of its beneficiaries while remaining compliant with environmental
norms and regulations. Surface water management would also comply with requirements of
Smart City developments.
The proposed mitigating measures that would be implemented to address run-off are: -
 Water conservation techniques (Water harvesting)

This will imply the installation of reservoirs/tanks below roof drainage pipes. This water would be
used mainly as yard cleaning or irrigation water for landscape areas in periods of water
shortage. The reservoirs/tanks would be either of prefabricated materials or reinforced concrete.
These tanks would have accessories to draw water for non-potable usage as the need arises.
Excess water from water tank would be channeled to the road side drain.
Page | 20
 Natural water Courses and drainage network
Ruisseau St Louis will be used as main discharge points for cut off drains and internal drain
reticulation networks. The proposed cut off drain on the mountain slopes would be connected to
the tribultary of Ruisseau St Louis.
 “Permeable structures”
Promote permeable parking lots – use “green blocks”, “eco-blocks” or pervious concrete for
parking spaces. These techniques are gradually gaining confidence among developers.
The overall benefit arising out of the implementation of the above measures would have the
effect of ensuring environmentally safe disposal of surface run-off. In addition to that, it would
act as a buffering measure that would result into increasing the time of concentration to
Ruisseau St Louis.
Page | 21
3.0 DESIGN APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY
The above measures have been considered for designing the mitigation required for the site.
The project design contains safe and reliable measures that would ensure the proper and safe
evacuation of surface water.
3.1 Design Standards

The following standards and references to reports have been made: -
 Study for the Land Drainage System for the Island of Mauritius – 2003
 Policy and Planning Guidelines – Ministry of Housing and Lands
 BS EN 752 Drain and sewer system outside buildings
 Hydrology Year Book For Mauritius - 2005
3.2 Design criteria

i. The catchment area is equivalent to the site confinement and is about 411, 761
m (0.411,761 km2)
2
ii. Footprint area taken for building is about 30%

iii. Cover for of landscaping and absorption area is around 24%
iv. Area allocated to Road surfaces amount to around 8%.
v. Rainfall Intensity – meteorological data
vi. The Rationale method has been used to estimate run-off
vii. The Manning model has been used to design the drains and check capacity of
existing drain
3.3 Design Notes

The Design notes for the estimate of run-off from the site and sizing of drain has been enclosed
in Annex 1 and Annex 2 of this report respectively.
Page | 22
3.4 Design Results
The run off management system will consist mainly of a drainage network which will channel
surface run-offs into the Ruisseau St Louis. As per our calculations, 500 x 500 mm, 700 x 700
mm and 1000 x 700 mm Reinforced Concrete Drain will be hydraulically sufficient to cater the
maximum peak flows in the various sub-catchments areas. Hydrological calculations and
catchment areas delimitation are found in Annex 1.
Additionally, in Sector 5, the development area will be protected by a cut-off drain to prevent
runoffs flowing from mountain peaks to enter the project area. The top cut-off drain will be 2.3 m
wide x 1.8 m deep open masonry drain which will discharge its run offs into the Tributary of
Ruisseau St Louis located at Guibies and Anse Courtois. As for the remaining cut off drain
located on the southern face (2.8 m wide x 2.0 m deep open masonry drain) and western
face (3.5 m wide x 2.3 m deep open masonry drain) of Sector 5, they will be connected to
Ruisseau St Louis (Drawing No: 18/VCEL/PSC/EIA/04).
On the lower portions of the project site (Sector 1 and 3), all drain networks will be connected to
a main drain located on the Access road situated on the Northen boundary of the Project area,
before discharging into Ruisseau St Louis. Concerning Sector 4, part of the run off will be
directed into SVICC surrounding cut off drains, before being converged into another point in
Ruisseau St Louis.
One exit channel of the cut-off drain surrounding SVICC located on Clos St Louis access road
will be re-aligned as shown in the layout drawing.
All hydraulic calculations and design notes are found in Annex 2.
4.0 CONCLUSION
Some areas of the site have considerable slope and may induced high run off flow. However,
with the proposed cut off drain in sector 5, run offs flowing from the mountain range would be
intercepted in the cut off drains. Its drainage is enhanced by the presence of Ruisseau St Louis
that would be as an important discharge point for all cut off drains and drain network system.
Road side drains and water evacuation systems have been designed for every critical access
road. The drain size provided for every sub- catchment areas would cater for the designed
rainfall intensity and return period of 1 in 25 years.
The generation of run-off arising from a storm event would be properly managed by the
proposed drainage network. However, the proposed mitigation does not cater for a calamity
scenario and in which case, an adaptation system poses as the best solution.
Page | 23
5.0 ADDITIONAL MEASURES
The following additional measures would be implemented: -
 The Contractor selected for the construction shall provide a comprehensive methodology
for construction before start of works
 The finished floor level to be raised at least 450 mm above finished road level.
 Each Villas to have a reservoir, minimum capacity 2000l, as water harvesting devices
 Internal access roads to have a 1.5% cross slope towards the gully of the drain
alignment.
 All parking lots to be on gentle slopes and directing water towards drain inlets.
 A “permeable” drainage system shall be constructed and maintenance of on-site drains

should be regular.
 Reprofiling of land may be prerequisite in order to provide suitable slopes for drain
networks.
 Water ponds could be integrated in the landscaping areas as natural holding features.
 Suitable plants that have high water absorption properties need to be incorporated within
the site landscape at specific locations. The expertise of a landscape architect would be
required.
Chandansingh CHUTOORI
Civil engineer
Page | 24
ANNEX 1:
DESIGN NOTES TO ESTIMATE RUN-OFF
Page | 25
A.1 RAINFALL INTENSITY
The maximum rainfall intensity duration curves of different return periods, from 2-year (T2) to
100-year (T100), have been generated by the Mauritius Meteorological Services (MMS) from
long records of many rain gauging stations distributed, more or less, evenly throughout
Mauritius. The rainfall intensity duration curves, shown in Figure 6, have been used in runoff
calculations.
Figure 23: IDF curves
The Duration has been computed from the Kirpich model.
For a T-25 return period and 1-hour duration the designed rainfall intensity is 1.75mm/min
A.2 HYDROLOGICAL ANALYSIS

As in Mauritius, most of the catchments under consideration are small and not gauged, standard
procedures for use on ungauged catchments have been used for hydrological analysis.
Since the catchment, considered in this project, is relatively small, the Rationale Method has
been used to estimate the run-off generated. This data would then be analysed to size the
drains that would evacuate the run-off. The equations, used for hydrological determination of
peak runoff for the sizing of drainage systems, are presented below.
The formula for calculating peak discharge at a given outlet of a catchment area is:
Page | 26
, where QT = Discharge (m3/s) for return period T
CT = Runoff coefficient for return period T
IT = Rainfall Intensity (mm/h) for return period T
A = Catchment Area (km2)
Runoff Coefficient, CT:
, where CT = Runoff coefficient for return period T

α = % of catchment that is rural
β = % of catchment that is urban
C1 = Cy + Cp + Cv , where values of Cy, Cp&Cv are provided in the following tables.
Mean Catchment Classification Cy values for different Mean

Slope Annual Precipitation (mm)
<600 600 - 900 >900
Less than 3% Marsh/Wetland 0.01 0.03 0.05
3% to 10% Flat 0.06 0.08 0.11
10% to 30% Hilly 0.12 0.16 0.20
Greater than 30% Steep 0.22 0.26 0.30
Classification Cpvalues for different Mean

Annual Precipitation (mm)
<600 600 - 900 >900
Very permeable 0.03 0.04 0.05
Permeable 0.06 0.08 0.10
Semi permeable 0.12 0.16 0.20
Impermeable 0.21 0.26 0.30
Classification Cvvalues for different Mean

Annual Precipitation (mm)
<600 600 - 900 >900
Thick Bush & Plantation 0.03 0.04 0.05
Light Bush & Farmland 0.07 0.10 0.15
Sugarcane 0.17 0.20 0.25
No vegetation 0.26 0.28 0.30
Page | 27
C2= % residential x Cresidential ,where Cresidential= 0.50
0.50 for 2 year return period,

FT= 0.60 for 10 year return period,
1.0 for 100 year return period
Time of Concentration, tc (Kirpich Equation):
, where tc = Time of concentration (hours)

L = Longest flow path (km)
S = Watershed Slope
Watershed slope, S:
, where S = Watershed slope

= Elevation difference between the most remote point and the outlet of the
catchment area (m)
L = Length of travel from the most remote point to the outlet of the catchment
area (m)
CALCULATIONS RESULTS
A.3 CATCHMENT AREA
The site has a full catchment area of around 411, 761 m2. The site was divided into 13 sub-
catchments with respect to the topography of the development area. Furthermore, based on the
topography and contour lines of whole plot, the sub catchments were separated into smaller
ones (Refer to drawing no: 18/VCEL/PSC/EIA/01 in Annex 1).
As for the Cut off drains in Sector 5 of the project site, it has been divided into three sub-
catchments (Refer to drawing no: 18/VCEL/PSC/EIA/02 in Annex 1)
Page | 28
A.4 Peak Flow
The peak flow has been calculated on the basis of the small sub catchment areas using the
rational method. The table below shows the different peak flow rate in the different small sub-
catchments where roadside drains will be placed as illustrated in drawing 18/VCEL/PSC/EIA/04.
Hydrological Calculations as well as their relative catchment areas have also been annexed. A
return period of 50 years have been used for the cut-off drains in Sector 5.
Table A: Summary of Catchment Areas and Associated Peak Flow rate
Sub- Catchments Catchment Area Peak Flow Rate, Qp

(km2) (m3/s)
A 0.026 0.701
B 0.028 0.587
C 0.022 0.582
D 0.035 0.951
E 0.027 0.921
F 0.015 -
G 0.015 0.473
H 0.041 0.922
I 0.056 1.048
J 0.037 0.692
K 0.029 -
L 0.016 -
M 0.0039 -
Cut off drain

Catchments
I 0.1198 6.698
II 0.2780 95.46
III 0.3650 14.028
Page | 29
Hydrological Calculations for
Sub-Catchment areas
Page | 30
26 Brabant Street, 2nd Floor,
Diva Building,Port Louis.
Tel : + (230) 212 1757 Fax : +(230) 208 4551
E-mail add : dagonig@intnet.mu
BRN : C07073722 VAT No. VAT20385911
PAILLES SMART CITY
YIHAI INVESTMENT
LTD
04
ZONE 7
PARCEL M Catchment areas
05
ZONE 5 ZONE 6 ZONE 6
ZONE 4 ZONE 4 PARCEL J PARCEL K PARCEL L
PARCEL H PARCEL H1 11
5
02 03 PAILLES
ZONE 2
PARCEL D 06
110 125
100 110
Mar 2018 YL NTS

13
13
0
90
ip
95
18/VCEL/PSC/EIA/01
11
85
5
105
07
01
120
70
80
135
ZONE 1
PARCEL C
ZONE 5
PARCEL I
14
08
180
ZONE 1
75
PARCEL B
200
320 330
15
230
0
09
16
290
0
140
30
0
310
Client
17
0
26
0 280 Project Manager
21
19
ZONE 1 0
Arch.
0
PARCEL A 11
15
ZONE 3 220
PARCEL F M&E
ZONE 3 12
PARCEL G
Contractor
270
18 ZONE 3
PARCEL E 16
240
250
10
VYYAASS Consulting Engineer Ltd
PROJECT Pailles Smart City - Drainage Report DATE 07/03/2018

ELEMENT Hydrological Analysis- Catchment A JOB NO
DONE BY Y. Luchoomun SHEET NO 1 of 1
APPROVED BY C. Chutoori REV NO
REF CALCULATIONS OUTPUT
WATERSHED CHARACTERISTICS
2
Total catchment area, A = 0.026 km
Max. Length of travel, L = 185 m
Height difference, Δh = 75 m
Water shed slope, S = 40.5%
ANALYSIS FOR RUN-OFF COEFFICIENT

% of catchment that's rural, α = 75%
% of catchment that's urban, β = 25%
Return Period, T = 25 years

FT = 0.7
Mean Annual Precipitation = 1200 mm

Mean Catchment Slope = 40.5%
Cy = 0.3
Cp = 0.2
Cv = 0.15
C1 = Cy + Cp + Cv = 0.65
% residential = 25%
Cresidential = 0.5
C2 = % residential x Cresidential = 0.125
Run-off Coefficient, CT = 0.37
RUN OFF ANALYSIS - RATIONAL METHOD

Time of concentration, tc = 0.03 hours
Rainfall Intensity
Rainfall Intensity, IT = 260.50 mm/h
Peak run-off rate, QT = 0.278 x CT x IT x A = 0.701 m3/s


ELEMENT Hydrological Analysis- Catchment B JOB NO
2


FT = 0.7

Cy = 0.3
Cp = 0.2
Cv = 0.15
C1 = Cy + Cp + Cv = 0.65
% residential = 50%
Cresidential = 0.5

Rainfall Intensity


ELEMENT Hydrological Analysis- Catchment C JOB NO
2


FT = 0.7

Cy = 0.3
Cp = 0.2
Cv = 0.15
C1 = Cy + Cp + Cv = 0.65
% residential = 50%
Cresidential = 0.5

Rainfall Intensity


ELEMENT Hydrological Analysis- Catchment D JOB NO
2


FT = 0.7

Cy = 0.3
Cp = 0.2
Cv = 0.15
C1 = Cy + Cp + Cv = 0.65
% residential = 70%
Cresidential = 0.5

Rainfall Intensity


ELEMENT Hydrological Analysis- Catchment E JOB NO
2


FT = 0.7

Cy = 0.3
Cp = 0.2
Cv = 0.15
C1 = Cy + Cp + Cv = 0.65
% residential = 80%
Cresidential = 0.5

Rainfall Intensity


ELEMENT Hydrological Analysis- Catchment G JOB NO
2


FT = 0.7

Cy = 0.3
Cp = 0.2
Cv = 0.15
C1 = Cy + Cp + Cv = 0.65
% residential = 70%
Cresidential = 0.5

Rainfall Intensity


ELEMENT Hydrological Analysis- Catchment H JOB NO
2


FT = 0.7

Cy = 0.3
Cp = 0.2
Cv = 0.15
C1 = Cy + Cp + Cv = 0.65
% residential = 70%
Cresidential = 0.5

Rainfall Intensity


ELEMENT Hydrological Analysis- Catchment I JOB NO
2
Height difference, Δh = 5m


FT = 0.7

Cy = 0.3
Cp = 0.2
Cv = 0.15
C1 = Cy + Cp + Cv = 0.65
% residential = 70%
Cresidential = 0.5

Rainfall Intensity


ELEMENT Hydrological Analysis- Catchment J JOB NO
2


FT = 0.7

Cy = 0.3
Cp = 0.2
Cv = 0.15
C1 = Cy + Cp + Cv = 0.65
% residential = 70%
Cresidential = 0.5

Rainfall Intensity


ELEMENT Hydrological Analysis- Main Drain JOB NO
2


FT = 0.7

Cy = 0.3
Cp = 0.2
Cv = 0.15
C1 = Cy + Cp + Cv = 0.65
% residential = 70%
Cresidential = 0.5

Rainfall Intensity

Hydrological Calculations for Cut off Drains
Catchment areas
Page | 31
16
15
13 05 26 Brabant Street, 2nd Floor,
Tel : + (230) 212 1757
Fax : +(230) 208 4551
E-mail :vyyaassconsultingengineer @intnet.mu
BRN : C07073722 VAT No. VAT20385911
PAILLES SMART
CITY
D
06
07
CUT OFF DRAIN

CATCHMENT AREA
E
12
PAILLES
08
11 mAR 2018 YL SLM & SM
A3 : As Shown
Client
Arch.
M&E
Contractor
Other
09
10
PROJECT Pailles Smart City- Drainage DATE 05/03/2018
ELEMENT Hydrological Analysis- Catchment I JOB NO

2


FT = 0.83

Cy = 0.3
Cp = 0.3
Cv = 0.05
C1 = Cy + Cp + Cv = 0.65
% residential = 0%
Cresidential = 0.5
C2 = % residential x Cresidential = 0

Rainfall Intensity

ELEMENT Hydrological Analysis- CATCHMENT II JOB NO

2


FT = 0.83

Cy = 0.3
Cp = 0.3
Cv = 0.05
C1 = C y + C p + C v = 0.65
% residential = 0%
Cresidential = 0.5

Rainfall Intensity

ELEMENT Hydrological Analysis- CATCHMENT III JOB NO

2


FT = 0.83

Cy = 0.3
Cp = 0.3
Cv = 0.05
C1 = Cy + Cp + Cv = 0.65
% residential = 0%
Cresidential = 0.5

Rainfall Intensity
3
Peak run-off rate, QT = 0.278 x CT x IT x A = 14.028 m /s
ANNEX 2:
DESIGN CALCULATIONS FOR DIMENSIONING

INTERNAL DRAIN NETWORK
Page | 32
B. HYDRAULICS ASSESSMENT
B.1. Drains
The drains have been sized using the Manning's Equation such that they have a capacity
greater than the peak flow determined by hydrological analysis.
Manning's Equation:
, where Qd = Discharge capacity of drain (m3/s)

n = Manning's coefficient
s = Slope of the bed of the drain
a = Cross-section area of drain (m2)
P= Wetted perimeter of drain section (m)
R = Hydraulic Radius = a/P
Manning's Equation modified for rectangular drain sizing:
.........................................Iteration formula
, where Q = Required Discharge capacity of drain (m3/s)

n = Manning's coefficient
s = Slope of the bed of the drain
d = Maximum water depth of drain (m)
w = Width of Drain
To prevent siltation of the drains, the minimum allowable velocity was taken as 0.8 m/s (except
in cases where natural topography dictates otherwise).
For this project all drains are to be lined with concrete except over a part downstream where
stone lining is envisaged. Therefore, a Manning's coefficient of 0.012 was used for the concrete
stretch.
Page | 33
B.1.1. CALCULATION RESULTS
A 500mm wide x 500mm deep, 700 mm wide x 700 mm deep, 1000 mm wide x 700 mm
deep reinforced concrete drain was found to be adequate for the different sub-catchment
areas. Calculations, to verify whether the proposed drain is hydraulically adequate, have been
given in below. The calculations for sub catchments areas have been included in Annex 2.
Calculations for the cut-off drains around Sector 5 have also been included.
Page | 34
CUT-OFF DRAIN DESIGN (SECTOR 5)
Page | 35
ELEMENT Hydraulic analysis- Catchment I JOB NO

DRAIN SIZING - MANNING'S EQUATION

Manning's Coefficient, n = 0.03
3
Required discharge capacity, Q = 6.698 m /s
Average Slope of bed, s = 1
Width, w = 7.00 m
0.5 3
(Qn/s ) = 0.008114
Water Depth, d (required) = 0.12 m
SECTION DIMENSIONS OF PROPOSED CUT OFF DRAIN :

Width, w = 2.50 m
Water Depth, d = 1.62 m
Freeboard (10%) = 0.18 m
Total Depth = 1.80 m
Wetted Perimeter, P = 5.74 m
2
Drain x-section area provided, a = 4.05 m
Average Slope of bed, s = 0.005
Hydraulic Radius, R = a/P = 0.71 m
1/2 2/3
Water Velocity, V = (1/n)s R = 1.87 m/s
Capacity, Qd = aV = 7.57 m3/s
Hence, adopt a 2.30 m wide x 1.8 m deep Open Masonry Drain

ELEMENT Hydraulic analysis- CATCHMENT II JOB NO


3
Width, w = 7.00 m
0.5 3
(Qn/s ) = 66.441688

Width, w = 2.80 m
2
1/2 2/3

ELEMENT Hydraulic analysis- CATCHMENT II AND III JOB NO


3
Required discharge capacity, Q = 23.578 m /s (14.028 + 9.55)
Average Slope of bed, s = 1
Width, w = 7.00 m
0.5 3
(Qn/s ) = 0.353903

Width, w = 3.50 m
2
1/2 2/3

ROAD SIDE DRAIN HYDRAULIC DESIGN FOR
EACH SUB-CATCHMENTS
Page | 36

ELEMENT Hydrological Analysis- Catchment A JOB NO

3
Minimum Slope of bed, s = 0.005
Width, w = 1.00 m
0.5 3
(Qn/s ) = 0.001686
SECTION DIMENSIONS OF RECTANGULAR DRAIN PROPOSED:

Width, w = 0.70 m
2
1/2 2/3
Water Velocity, V = (1/n)s R = 2.180 m/s >0.8m/s,O.K
Discharge Capacity, Qd = aV = 0.961 m3/s Capacity >
required, O.K
∴ ADOPT 700x700mm RC DRAIN


ELEMENT Hydrological Analysis- Catchment B JOB NO

3
Width, w = 1.00 m
0.5 3
(Qn/s ) = 0.000097

Width, w = 0.50 m
2
1/2 2/3
required, O.K


ELEMENT Hydraulic Design- Catchment C JOB NO

3
Width, w = 1.00 m
0.5 3
(Qn/s ) = 0.000121

Width, w = 0.50 m
2
1/2 2/3
required, O.K


ELEMENT Hydraulic design- Catchment D JOB NO

3
Width, w = 1.00 m
0.5 3
(Qn/s ) = 0.004209

Width, w = 0.70 m
2
1/2 2/3
required, O.K


ELEMENT Hydraulic design- Catchment E JOB NO

3
Width, w = 1.00 m
0.5 3
(Qn/s ) = 0.003813

Width, w = 0.70 m
2
1/2 2/3
required, O.K


ELEMENT Hydraulic design- Catchment G JOB NO

3
Width, w = 1.00 m
0.5 3
(Qn/s ) = 0.000519

Width, w = 0.50 m
2
1/2 2/3
required, O.K


ELEMENT Hydraulic design- Catchment H JOB NO

3
Width, w = 1.00 m
0.5 3
(Qn/s ) = 0.003831

Width, w = 0.70 m
2
1/2 2/3
required, O.K


ELEMENT Hydraulic design- Catchment I JOB NO

3
Width, w = 1.00 m
0.5 3
(Qn/s ) = 0.000983

Width, w = 0.50 m
2
1/2 2/3
required, O.K


ELEMENT Hydraulic design- Catchment J JOB NO

3
Width, w = 1.00 m
0.5 3
(Qn/s ) = 0.000203

Width, w = 0.50 m
2
1/2 2/3
required, O.K


ELEMENT Hydraulic Analysis- Main drain JOB NO

3
Width, w = 1.00 m
0.5 3
(Qn/s ) = 0.009635

Width, w = 1.00 m
2
1/2 2/3
required, O.K

ANNEX 3:
DRAINAGE LAYOUT & DRAWINGS
Page | 37
Tel : + (230) 212 1757 Fax : +(230) 208 4551
BRN : C07073722 VAT No. VAT20385911
PROPOSED SMART CITY AT
PAILLES
04
ZONE 7
PARCEL M
22,062.30m²
05 SURVEY LAYOUT
PARCEL H PARCEL H1 12,129.59m² 18,008.92m² 4,728.69m² 1 15
19,216.15m² 4,981.38m²
02 03
ZONE 2
PARCEL D 06
11 125
26,325.01m² 100 0
11
0
PAILLES
13
13
0
90
ip
95
MARCH 2018 YR A1 -AS SHOWN
11
85
5
105
07
01
18/VCEL/PSC/EIA/03
12
0
70
80
13 5
ZONE 1
PARCEL C
11,031.89m²
ZONE 5
PARCEL I
14 9,570.86m²
08
18 0
ZONE 1
75
PARCEL B
10,289m²
32
20 0
0 330
15
23
0
0
16
29
0
0
14 0
300
310
1 70
2 60 28
0
19
21
ZONE 1 0
0
PARCEL A 11
9,275.17m² 15
ZONE 3 220
PARCEL F
4,577.73m² ZONE 3 12
PARCEL G
270
18 5,561.05m²
ZONE 3
PARCEL E 16
6,697.91m²
240
250
10
Client
Arch.
M&E
Contractor
Other
SEE BLOW UP 2 04
ZONE 7
PARCEL M
22,062.30m²
05
PARCEL H PARCEL H1 12,129.59m² 11
18,008.92m² 4,728.69m² 5
19,216.15m² 4,981.38m²
02 03
ZONE 2
PARCEL D 06
26,325.01m² 110 125
100 1 10
13
0
13
90
ip
95
Tel : + (230) 212 1757 Fax : +(230) 208 4551
11
105
5
85
07
01
120
70
80
BRN : C07073722 VAT No. VAT20385911
135
ZONE 1
PARCEL C
11,031.89m²
ZONE 5
PARCEL I
14 9,570.86m²
08
180
ZONE 1
75
PARCEL B
10,289m²
3 20
200
330
15
230
0
16
140 09
0
2 90
3 00
310
17
0
26 280
0
21
ZONE 1 0
19
0
11
PARCEL A
9,275.17m² 15
ZONE 3 220
PARCEL F
4,577.73m² ZONE 3 12
PARCEL G
5,561.05m²
270
18 ZONE 3
PARCEL E 16
6,697.91m²
240
250
PAILLES
10
NODE Q2 NODE O2
KEY PLAN YIHAI INVESTMENT LTD
01 Road slope
NODE M1
Roa
d sl
ope ROAD AND DRAIN LAYOUT
(SHEET 2 OF 2)
NODE K1
70
PAILLES
NODE Q1 NODE O1
NODE L
18/VCEL/PSC/EIA/04
R oa d
NODE N1
slope
03
11
Road slope
5
NODE K
NODE N
10
0
PROPOSED CROSS DRAIN 90
WITH METAL GRATING 85 NODE J
Road slope
11
0
13
NODE O
75
11
80
0
NODE M
95
Client
Arch.
M&E
Contractor
Other
EXISTING DOUBLE PIPE CULVERT
105
NODE P
NODE Q NODE J1
15
16
EXISTING CHANNEL
PROPOSED REALIGNMENT OF EXISTING
WATERCOURSE CHANNEL HERE
BLOW UP 2
SEE BLOW UP 1
04
ZONE 7
PARCEL M
22,062.30m²
05
PARCEL H PARCEL H1 12,129.59m² 11
18,008.92m² 4,728.69m² 5
19,216.15m² 4,981.38m²
02 03
ZONE 2
PARCEL D 06
26,325.01m² 110 125
100 1 10
13
0
13
90
ip
95
Tel : + (230) 212 1757 Fax : +(230) 208 4551
11
105
5
85
07
01
120
70
80
BRN : C07073722 VAT No. VAT20385911
135
ZONE 1
PARCEL C
11,031.89m²
ZONE 5
PARCEL I
14 9,570.86m²
08
180
ZONE 1
75
PARCEL B
10,289m²
3 20
200
330
15
230
0
16
140 09
0
2 90
3 00
310
17
0
26 280
0
21
ZONE 1 0
19
0
11
PARCEL A
9,275.17m² 15
ZONE 3 220
PARCEL F
4,577.73m² ZONE 3 12
PARCEL G
5,561.05m²
270
18 ZONE 3
PARCEL E 16
6,697.91m²
240
250
PAILLES
10
KEY PLAN YIHAI INVESTMENT LTD
ROAD AND DRAIN LAYOUT
(SHEET 1 OF 2)
04
NODE E4
PAILLES
NODE E3
05
18/VCEL/PSC/EIA/04
06
12 5
NODE E2
11 NODE I
0
13
0
11
5
NODE D1
07
120
135
NODE E1
NODE C1 Client
NODE B1 Arch.
08 M&E
180
Contractor
Other
320 330
200
15
230
0
09
16
140 29
0
0
NODE E 30
0 310
17
0
NODE A
26 280
0
21
19
0
0
11
NODE G
220
12
270
NODE F
240
NODE D
NODE B
250
BLOW UP 1 NODE C
10

A) Drainage Report Including Road Layout and Drainage Layout B) Parking Layout

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

A) Drainage Report Including Road Layout and Drainage Layout B) Parking Layout

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

A) Drainage Report Including Road Layout and Drainage Layout B) Parking Layout

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ANNEX 9

a) Drainage report including road layout and drainage

PAILLES SMART CITY

1.2 THE PROJECT

The project will be developed in a phased manner as displayed in Table 4.1: -

Development Type Plot Size (m2) No. of blocks

Figure 1: Project Site Location (Extract: Google Map)

Figure 2: Project Site Location - Jurisdiction

1.5 The Site Description

Figure 5: Culvert across access leading to Clos St. Louis

Figure 6: Ruisseau St Louis section near SVICC access Road

The following pictures are specific points along Sector 1.

Figure 7: Section 1 Boundary Road

Figure 9: Current Section 1 site preview

Sector 2 consists mainly of the Premises of Swami Vivekabanda International Convention

Figure 11: SVICC view

Figure 13: Road found along the eastern boundary of sector 3

Figure 15: Water accumulation in Sector 3

Figure 16: Left Hand side- Sector 4

Figure 17: View of Sector 5 at SVICC Round about

Figure 18: Lowest boundary of Sector 5

Figure 19: View of Sector 5 from South West Direction

1.5.2 Site Geology

Figure 20: Site Geology

1.5.3 Soil Type

Figure 21: Soil Map of Site

Tributary Ruisseau St Louis

Figure 22: Water Courses near Project Site

1.5.8 Rainfall Intensities

Figure 23: Isoyetal Map of Mauritius (Courtesy: Meteorological Services)

1.5.9 Return Periods

2.0 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT

 Water conservation techniques (Water harvesting)

3.1 Design Standards

3.2 Design criteria

ii. Footprint area taken for building is about 30%

3.3 Design Notes

All hydraulic calculations and design notes are found in Annex 2.

The following additional measures would be implemented: -

 A “permeable” drainage system shall be constructed and maintenance of on-site drains

DESIGN NOTES TO ESTIMATE RUN-OFF

Figure 23: IDF curves

The Duration has been computed from the Kirpich model.

A.2 HYDROLOGICAL ANALYSIS

Runoff Coefficient, CT:

, where CT = Runoff coefficient for return period T

Mean Catchment Classification Cy values for different Mean

Classification Cpvalues for different Mean

Classification Cvvalues for different Mean

0.50 for 2 year return period,

Time of Concentration, tc (Kirpich Equation):

, where tc = Time of concentration (hours)

, where S = Watershed slope

A.3 CATCHMENT AREA

Table A: Summary of Catchment Areas and Associated Peak Flow rate

Sub- Catchments Catchment Area Peak Flow Rate, Qp

Cut off drain