Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Classification of Common Acetabular Fractures: Radiographic and CT Appearances
Classification of Common Acetabular Fractures: Radiographic and CT Appearances
M u s c u l o s ke l e t a l I m ag i n g • P i c t o r i a l E s s ay
Radiographic and CT
Classification of Acetabular
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 2607:fea8:4fc0:7540:483d:123d:a7ca:8731 on 05/20/21 from IP address 2607:fea8:4fc0:7540:483d:123d:a7ca:8731. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved
Fractures
A C E N T U
R Y O F Classification of Common
Acetabular Fractures:
MEDICAL IMAGING
Radiographic and CT Appearances
N. Jarrod Durkee1,2 OBJECTIVE. Accurate characterization of acetabular fractures can be difficult because of
Jon Jacobson1 the complex acetabular anatomy and the many fracture patterns. In this article, the five most
David Jamadar1 common acetabular fractures are reviewed: both-column, T-shaped, transverse, transverse with
Madhav A. Karunakar3 posterior wall, and isolated posterior wall. Fracture patterns on radiography are correlated with
Yoav Morag1 CT, including multiplanar reconstruction and 3D surface rendering.
CONCLUSION. In the evaluation of the five most common acetabular fractures, assessment
Curtis Hayes1,4
of the obturator ring, followed by the iliopectineal and ilioischial lines and iliac wing, for fracture
Durkee NJ, Jacobson J, Jamadar D, allows accurate classification. CT is helpful in understanding the various fracture patterns.
Karunakar MA, Morag Y, Hayes C
ccurate classification of acetabular posterior column extends superiorly from the
2Present address: Department of Radiology, University of Normal Anatomy: Columns and Walls
Washington, Seattle, WA. The acetabulum is formed by anterior and
3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Michigan
posterior columns of bone, which join in the
Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0326. supraacetabular region [2, 6, 8]. The anterior
and posterior walls extend from each respec-
4Present address: Department of Radiology, Medical
tive column and form the cup of the acetabu-
College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, lum. The anterior and posterior columns con-
Richmond, VA.
nect to the axial skeleton through a strut of
CME bone called the sciatic buttress. When looking
This article is available for 1 CME credit. See www.arrs.org at the acetabulum en face, the anterior and A
for more information. posterior columns have the appearance of the Fig. 1—Normal pelvic bone anatomy.
Greek letter lambda (λ) [2, 6] (Fig. 1A). The A, Surface-rendering 3D CT of pelvis in lateral view
AJR 2006; 187:915–925 with femur and right hemipelvis removed shows
anterior column represents the longer, larger anterior column (green), posterior column (blue), and
0361–803X/06/1874–915
portion, which extends superiorly from the sciatic buttress (red).
© American Roentgen Ray Society superior pubic ramus into the iliac wing. The (Fig. 1 continues on next page)
Durkee et al.
B C
Fig. 1 (continued)—Normal pelvic bone anatomy.
B, Axial section through acetabulum shows anterior (arrowhead) and posterior (arrow) walls.
C, Anteroposterior radiograph shows iliopectineal line (green), ilioischial line (blue), anterior acetabular wall (yellow), posterior acetabular wall (pink), and obturator foramen (O).
A B C
Fig. 2—Illustrations of classification of five most common acetabular fractures.
A, Both-column fracture.
B, T-shaped fracture.
C, Transverse fracture.
(Fig. 2 continues on next page)
which attaches the columns to the axial skel- On radiographs, the iliopectineal (or ilio- of the anterior and posterior walls are also
eton. The anterior and posterior walls, which pubic) line represents the border of the ante- identified. The obturator rings are composed
extend from the columns and support the hip rior column, and the ilioischial line represents of the osseous structures that surround the ob-
joint, are well seen on an axial CT (Fig. 1B). the posterior column [9] (Fig. 1C). The edges turator foramen, which include the superior
D E Both-Column Fracture
A both-column acetabular fracture (Figs. 4
Fig. 2 (continued)—Illustrations of classification of five most common acetabular fractures.
D, Transverse with posterior wall fracture. and 5) involves both anterior and posterior col-
E, Isolated posterior wall fracture. umns with extension into the obturator ring
and iliac wing, and is one of the most common
acetabular fractures [4]. On radiographs, frac-
ture involvement of the anterior and posterior
columns is characterized by disruption of the
iliopectineal line and ilioischial line, respec-
ACETABULAR
FRACTURE
tively. However, disruption of these lines may
IDENTIFIED also be seen with other fracture patterns, such
OBTURATOR
as a transverse fracture. Obturator ring and il-
RING iac wing involvement must also be present for
DISRUPTION?
YES NO
classification as a both-column acetabular
fracture. Fracture extension into the iliac wing
FRACTURE LINE ILIOISCHIAL AND
EXTENSION INTO ILIAC ILIOPECTINEAL LINE is not always obvious on the anteroposterior ra-
WING? DISRUPTION?
diograph; oblique Judet views or CT often re-
YES NO veal this finding.
YES NO POSTERIOR POSTERIOR On CT, fracture involvement of the ante-
WALL WALL
FRACTURE? FRACTURE?
rior and posterior columns is seen, and the
YES NO YES
fracture may be comminuted. Fracture dis-
Fig. 3—Classification ruption of the obturator ring has a variable
TRANSVERSE + ISOLATED
algorithm for five BOTH-COLUMN T-SHAPED
POSTERIOR WALL
TRANSVERSE
POSTERIOR
appearance; fracture of the superior pubic
FRACTURE FRACTURE FRACTURE
common acetabular FRACTURE WALL FRACTURE ramus may occur at the puboacetabular
fractures [2].
junction. In addition, fracture of the inferior
pubic ramus may be difficult to identify if
nondisplaced. The principal fracture line,
which extends superiorly from the acetabu-
lum into the iliac wing, is characteristically
pubic ramus and a combination of the inferior Fracture Patterns in the coronal plane.
pubic ramus and ischium (or ischiopubic ra- The most widely accepted classification If present, a pathognomonic sign of a
mus). Anteroposterior and bilateral oblique scheme for acetabular fractures is that of both-column fracture is the spur sign [2]
(or Judet) views of the pelvis are important to Judet and Letournel [2, 4, 6]. Although this (Fig. 5). This sign represents posterior dis-
adequately assess each of the radiographic classification scheme describes 10 types placement of the sciatic buttress of the iliac
lines for fracture. of acetabular fractures, we have focused wing fracture, which essentially discon-
Durkee et al.
nects the roof of the acetabulum from the shard of bone extending posteriorly at the T-Shaped Fracture
axial skeleton. When this occurs, weight level of the superior acetabulum. Evaluation A T-shaped acetabular fracture (Fig. 6) is a
from the torso and upper body can no longer of sequential CT images shows the fracture, combination of a transverse acetabular frac-
be supported by the acetabulum. On radio- which separates the sciatic buttress from the ture with extension inferiorly into the obtura-
graphs and CT, the spur sign appears as a acetabular roof. tor ring. It is similar to a both-column fracture
A B
D E
Fig. 5—35-year-old man with both-column acetabular fracture and spur sign.
A and B, Oblique pelvic radiograph (A) and axial CT image (B) show spur sign (arrow),
which represents displacement of fracture involving sciatic buttress (arrowheads).
Note that sciatic buttress (arrowheads, B) no longer connects to weight-bearing
portion of acetabulum.
A B
in that it disrupts the obturator ring iliac wing, which allows differentiation from actually in the anatomic transverse plane, but
(Figs. 6A–6C). Another similarity is disrup- the both-column fracture. rather it is transverse relative to the acetabu-
tion of both the iliopectineal and ilioischial One area of potential confusion with the T- lum. Because the cup shape of the acetabulum
lines (Figs. 6A–6C). However, the superior shaped fracture is in regard to the transverse is normally tilted inferiorly and anteriorly, the
extension of the fracture does not involve the component. The transverse fracture line is not transverse fracture plane assumes a similar
Durkee et al.
A B
Fig. 6—40-year-old man with T-shaped acetabular fracture.
A–E, Anteroposterior pelvic radiograph (A), bilateral oblique pelvic radiographs (B,
C), axial CT scan (D), and surface-rendering 3D CT scan viewed laterally (E), with
right hemipelvis and femur removed, show obturator ring fractures (arrowheads) and
transverse component (arrows) through acetabulum. Note characteristic
oblique–sagittal orientation of transverse acetabular fracture component on CT
scans that is transverse relative to acetabulum on radiographs.
(Fig. 6 continues on next page)
orientation. Therefore, on radiographs, the Transverse Fracture fracture described previously, this fracture
fracture lines that disrupt the iliopectineal and The transverse fracture of the acetabu- line extends superiorly and medially from
ilioischial lines course superiorly and medi- lum (Fig. 7) is limited to the acetabulum, the acetabulum. On CT, the characteristic
ally in an oblique plane from the acetabulum. without involvement of the obturator ring. sagittally oriented fracture line can be seen
This is best appreciated by looking at the ac- A transverse fracture must involve both the moving laterally to medially on subsequent
etabulum en face (Fig. 6E). On CT, this trans- anterior and posterior aspects of the acetab- CT images when scrolling from inferior to
verse fracture component is seen as a sagit- ulum, so the iliopectineal and ilioischial superior. Although not anatomically trans-
tally oriented fracture coursing medially and lines are disrupted on radiography. Similar verse, the fracture plane is transverse rela-
superiorly from the acetabulum. to the transverse component of the T-shaped tive to the acetabulum, which is relatively
Fig. 6 (continued)—
40-year-old man with
T-shaped acetabular
fracture.
A–E, Anteroposterior
pelvic radiograph (A),
bilateral oblique pelvic
radiographs (B, C), axial
CT scan (D), and surface-
rendering 3D CT scan
viewed laterally (E), with
right hemipelvis and
femur removed, show
obturator ring fractures
(arrowheads) and
transverse component
(arrows) through
acetabulum. Note
characteristic
oblique–sagittal
orientation of transverse
acetabular fracture
component on CT scans
that is transverse relative
to acetabulum on
radiographs.
D E
A B
Fig. 7—23-year-old woman with transverse acetabular fracture.
A–E, Anteroposterior pelvic radiograph (A), bilateral oblique pelvic radiographs (B, C), axial CT scan (D), and surface-rendering 3D CT scan viewed laterally (E), with right
hemipelvis and femur removed, show fracture (arrows) orientation transverse to acetabulum, disrupting iliopectineal and ilioischial lines (arrowheads). Note characteristic
sagittal–oblique fracture plane on CT scan (D).
(Fig. 7 continues on next page)
tilted inferiorly and anteriorly. This fracture Transverse with Posterior Wall posterior wall fracture that is often displaced.
plane orientation is best seen on CT recon- The transverse with posterior wall fracture As with an isolated transverse fracture, the
struction images of the acetabulum en face (Fig. 8) is a transverse fracture, described pre- key is recognizing that the obturator ring is
(Fig. 7E). viously, with the addition of a comminuted not disrupted, as this excludes both-column
Durkee et al.
C
Fig. 7 (continued)—23-year-old woman with transverse acetabular fracture.
A–E, Anteroposterior pelvic radiograph (A), bilateral oblique pelvic radiographs (B,
C), axial CT scan (D), and surface-rendering 3D CT scan viewed laterally (E), with
right hemipelvis and femur removed, show fracture (arrows) orientation transverse
to acetabulum, disrupting iliopectineal and ilioischial lines (arrowheads). Note
characteristic sagittal–oblique fracture plane on CT scan (D).
and T-shaped fractures. As with the simple Isolated Posterior Wall Conclusion
transverse fracture, this fracture type does not The isolated posterior wall fracture Common acetabular fractures can easily be
extend into the iliac wing. (Fig. 9) is one of the most common types of classified using disruption of the obturator ring
On radiographs, disruption of both ilio- acetabular fracture, with a prevalence of as the basis of a decision tree (Fig. 3). Fracture
pectineal and ilioischial lines is seen as with 27% [8]. An isolated posterior wall fracture of the obturator ring indicates both-column or
the isolated transverse fracture. Unlike an iso- does not have a complete transverse acetab- T-shaped fracture, with additional iliac wing
lated transverse fracture, however, additional ular component. Therefore, the iliopectineal involvement differentiating the both-column
comminution of the posterior wall is seen. In line is not disrupted, which excludes classi- from the T-shaped fracture. Sparing of the ob-
the absence of displacement, comminution of fication of the transverse with posterior wall turator ring commonly indicates transverse,
the posterior wall may be difficult to identify fracture. However, disruption of the iliois- transverse with posterior wall, or isolated pos-
on anteroposterior radiographs because the chial line may or may not be present as an terior wall fracture. Disruption of both the ilio-
fragments are superimposed on the femoral extension of the comminuted posterior wall pectineal and ilioischial lines indicates a trans-
head. Oblique Judet radiographs and CT are component. Oblique (Judet) radiographs verse fracture, and comminution of the posterior
helpful in showing the comminuted posterior and CT are helpful in showing the isolated wall indicates a posterior wall fracture. A both-
wall component. posterior wall fracture. column fracture is in the coronal plane, whereas
A B
Fig. 8—20-year-old man showing transverse with posterior wall acetabular fracture.
A–E, Anteroposterior pelvic radiograph (A), bilateral oblique pelvic radiographs (B,
C), axial CT scan (D), and surface-rendering 3D CT scan viewed laterally (E), with
right hemipelvis and femur removed, show transverse fracture (straight arrows)
disrupting iliopectineal and ilioischial lines (arrowheads) with displaced and
comminuted posterior wall fracture fragment (curved arrows).
E
Durkee et al.
A B
F O R YO U R I N F O R M AT I O N
This article is available for 1 CME credit. See www.arrs.org for more information.