Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1) Define Management and Explain The Level of Management (Jan 2020 - 8 Marks) (2018)
1) Define Management and Explain The Level of Management (Jan 2020 - 8 Marks) (2018)
1) Organizing:
Organizing is the distribution of work in group-wise
or section-wise for effective performance. Once the
managers have established objectives and
developed plans to achieve them, they must design
and develop a human organization that will be able
to carry out those plans successfully.
Organizing involves dividing work into convenient
tasks or duties, grouping of such duties in the form
of positions, grouping of various positions into
departments and sections, assigning duties to
individual positions and delegating authority to
each position so that the work is carried out as
planned.
1) Staffing:
Staffing involves managing various positions of the
organizational structure. It involves selecting and
placing the right person at the right position.
Staffing includes identifying the gap between
manpower required and available, identifying the
sources from where people will be selected,
selecting people, training them, fixing the financial
compensation and appraising them periodically.
The success of the organization depends upon the
successful performance of staffing function.
5)Controlling:
Planning, organizing, staffing and directing are
required to realize organizational objectives. To
ensure that the achieved objectives confirm to the
pre-planned objectives control function is necessary.
Control is the process of checking to determine
whether or not proper progress is being made
towards the objectives and goals and acting if
necessary to correct any deviations. Control involves
three elements:
(a) Establishing standards of performance.
(b) Measuring current performance and comparing it
against the established standard.
(c) Taking action to correct any performance that does not
meet those standards.
6)Innovation:
1. Innovation means creating new ideas which may be
either results in the development of new products or
finding new uses for the old ones. A manager who
invents new products is an innovator. A salesman
who persuades Eskimos to purchase refrigerator is an
innovator. One has to note that innovation is not a
separate function but a part of planning.
(7) Representation:
2. A manager has to spend a part of his time in
representing his organization before various groups
which have some stake in the organization. A
manager has to be act as representative of a
company. He has dealings with customers, suppliers,
government officials, banks, trade unions and the like.
It is the duty of every manager to have good
relationship with others.
6)Unity of command
Person should be answered to only boss only
If person under one or more boss then there is likely hood
of conflict
7) Exception
Top management should not interfere.Only interference if
something goes wrong
Should let other work to lower level management
8) Simplicity:-
Organizational structure should be simple so that each
person should understand
Complex structure creates confusions
9)Span of control:
Means how many subordinates can ne supervised under
supervisor
No.of subordinates should be such that supervisor should
be able to control their work effectively
10) Scalar principal:-
Also called chain of command from top management to
frontline
11) Delegation
Authority should be delegated to lower level also
Authority delegated should be equal to responsibility
Inadequate delegatio often results in multiplication of staff
activity
12)Unity of direction
There should be one objective and one plan for a group of
activities having the same objective.
facilitates unification and coordination of activities at
various levels.
13)Personal Ability:
As people constitute an organization, there is need for
proper selection, placement and training of staff. Further
use of human resources and encourage management
development programmes
14) Acceptability:
The structure of the organization should be acceptable to
the people who constitute it.
Two things generally happen if people oppose the
structure: it is modified gradually by the people, or it is
used ineffectively.
Participative (democratic)
This style involves the leader including one or more
employees in the decision making process
(determining what to do and how to do it). However,
the leader maintains the final decision making
authority.
Using this style is not a sign of weakness, rather it is a
sign of strength that your employees will respect. This
is normally used when you have part of the
information, and your employees have other parts.
Using this style is of mutual benefit — it allows them
to become part of the team and allows you to make
better decisions.
Advantages:
1.it encourages creativity
2.It strengthens the relationship of a team
3.it is a leadership style that anyone can participate
4.It improves job satisfaction
Disadvantages:
1.It can create negative emotions
2.It can lead to procrastination
3.It does not guarantee best solution
Delegative (free reign)
In this style, the leader allows the employees to make
the decisions. However, the leader is still responsible
for the decisions that are made. This is used when
employees are able to analyze the situation and
determine what needs to be done and how to do it.
This is not a style to use so that you can blame others
when things go wrong, rather this is a style to be used
when you fully trust and confidence in the people
below you.
Advantages:-
1)the leadership style highlights the expertise of a
team
2)it creates more work place satisfaction
Disadvantages:-
1)This leadership style takes a background role on
projects
2)it shift possiblity of outcomes.
7. With the help of block diagram, explain Maslow’s Hierarchy
of needs theory (10 marks)(2019- 8
marks) (2018 – 8 marks)
According to Maslow, lower needs take priority. They must be
fulfilled before the others are activated. There is some basic
common sense here -- it's pointless to worry about whether a
given color looks good on you when you are dying of starvation,
or being threatened with your life. There are some basic things
that take precedence over all else.
Or at least logically should, if people were rational. But is that a
safe assumption? According to the theory, if you are hungry
and have inadequate shelter, you won't go to church. Can't do
the higher things until you have the lower things. But the poor
tend to be more religious than the rich. Both within a given
culture, and across nations. So the theory makes the wrong
prediction here. Or take education: how often do you hear "I
can't go to class today, I haven't had sex in three days!"? Do all
physiological needs including sex have to be satisfied before
"higher" needs?(Besides, wouldn't the authors of the Kama
Sutra argue that sex was a kind of self-expression more like art
than a physiological need? that would put it in the self-
actualization box). Again, the theory doesn't seem to predict
correctly. Cultural critique: Does Maslow's classification really
reflect the order in which needs are satisfied, or is it more
about classifying needs from a kind of "tastefulness"
perspective, with lofty goals like personal growth and creativity
at the top, and "base" instincts like sex and hunger at the
bottom? And is self-actualization actually a fundamental need?
Or just something that can be done if you have the leisure
time?
Alderfer's ERG theory
Alderfer classifies needs into three categories, also ordered
hierarchically:
• growth needs (development of competence and realization of
potential)
• relatedness needs (satisfactory relations with others)
• existence needs (physical well-being)
This is very similar to Maslow -- can be seen as just collapsing
into three tiers. But maybe a bit more rational. For example, in
Alderfer's model, sex does not need to be in the bottom
category as it is in Maslow's model, since it is not crucial to (the
individual's) existence. (Remember, this about individual
motivation, not species' survival.) So by moving sex, this theory
does not predict that people have to have sex before they can
think about going to school, like Maslow's theory does. Alderfer
believed that as you start satisfying higher needs, they become
more intense (e.g., the power you get the more you want
power), like an addiction. Do any of these theories have
anything useful to say for managing businesses? Well, if true,
they that
• Not everyone is motivated by the same things. It depends
where you are in the hierarchy (think of it as a kind of personal
development scale)
• The needs hierarchy probably mirrors the organizational
hierarchy to a certain extent: top managers are more likely to
motivated by self-actualization/growth needs than existence
needs. (but try telling Bill Clinton that top executives are not
motivated by sex and cheeseburgers...)