Trade Off Table – Columns

TRADE OFF TABLE- COLUMNS

Design Criteria Unit Design Type 1 (LRFD) Design Type 2 (ASD)
Economical php ₱ 2,449,795.48 ₱ 2,449,795.48
Capacity Ratio % 0.64 0.14
Manufacturability days 21 21

Raw Designer Ranking – Beams

RAW DESIGNER RANKING - COLUMN

DESIGN TYPE 1 (LRFD) DESIGN TYPE 2 (ASD)
UNI IMPORTANCE
DESIGN CRITERIA RAN RAN
T FACTOR CRITERION VALUE VALUE
K K
Economical php 40 ₱2,449,795.48 10 ₱ 2,449,795.48 10
Capacity Ratio % 40 0.64 4.57 0.14 10
Manufacturabilty days 20 21 10 21 10
OVERALL RANK 782.8 1000

The table shows the Raw Designer -Ranking – Column

The table shows the Raw Designer Ranking of Design type 1 (LRFD) and Design Type 2 (ASD)
based on the three criterions of 40% Economical, 40% Safety, and 20% Manufacturability. The
table shows that the governing structure is Design type 2 (USD) costing ₱ 2,449,795.48, a safety
ratio of 0.64 that is to be completed in 21 days.

RAW DESIGNER RANKING

DESIGN CRITERIA STRUCTURE 1 (LRFD) STRUCTURE 2(ASD)
Economical 10 10
Capacity Ratio 4.57 10
Manufacturabilty 10 10
 Raw Designer Ranking - Column
12

10

0
Economical Safety Manufacturability

Structure 1 (LRFD) Structure 2 (ASD)

TRADE-OFFS 1 - COLUMN
IMPORTANCE DESIGN TYPE 1 (LRFD) DESIGN TYPE 2 (ASD)
DESIGN
UNIT FACTOR RAN
CRITERIA VALUE VALUE RANK
CRITERION K
Economical php 10 ₱2,449,795.48 10 ₱ 2,449,795.48 10
Capacity Ratio % 60 0.64 4.57 0.14 10
Manufacturabilty days 30 21 10 21 10
OVERALL RANK 674.2 1000

The table shows the Trade-Offs 1 – Column

The table shows that the criterions used in the Raw Designer Ranking of Beams are traded to a
10% Economical, 60% Safety, and 30% Manufacturability. The table shows that the governing
structure is Design type 2 (ASD) that cost ₱ 2,449,795.48 having the highest rank, Safety ratio
of 0.14 placing 10th and a manufacturability of 21 days.
 TRADE-OFFS2- COLUMN
IMPORTANCE FACTOR DESIGN TYPE 1 (LRFD) DESIGN TYPE 2 (ASD)
DESIGN CRITERIA UNIT
CRITERION VALUE RANK VALUE RANK
Economical php 30 ₱2,449,795.48 10 ₱ 2,449,795.48 10
Capacity Ratio % 20 0.64 4.57 0.14 10
Manufacturabilty days 50 21 10 21 10
OVERALL RANK 891.4 1000

The table shows the Trade-Offs 2 – Column

The table shows that the criterions used in the Raw Designer Ranking of Beams are traded to a
30% Economical, 20% Safety, and 50% Manufacturability. The table shows that the governing
structure is still Design type 2 (ASD) that cost ₱ 2,449,795.48 having the highest rank, Safety
ratio of 0.14 placing 10th and a manufacturability of 21 days.

TRADE-OFFS 3 - COLUMN
UNI IMPORTANCE FACTOR DESIGN TYPE 1 (LRFD) DESIGN TYPE 2 (ASD)
DESIGN CRITERIA
T CRITERION VALUE RANK VALUE RANK
Economical php 65 ₱2,449,795.48 10 ₱14,520,563.33 10
Capacity Ratio % 25 0.64 4.57 0.14 10
Manufacturabilty days 10 21 10 21 10
OVERALL RANK 864.25 1000

The table shows the Trade-Offs 3 – Column

The table shows that the criterions used in the Raw Designer Ranking of Beams are traded to a
65% Economical, 25% Safety, and 10% Manufacturability. The table shows that the governing
structure is still Design type 2 (ASD) that cost ₱ 2,449,795.48 having the highest rank, Safety
ratio of 0.14 placing 10th and a manufacturability of 21 days.

SUMMARY OF TRADE-OFFS - BEAM

   Structure 1 (LRFD) Structure 2 (ASD)
Raw Designer Ranking 782.8 1000
Trade-offs 1 674.2 1000
Trade-offs 2 891.4 1000
Trade-offs 3 864.25 1000

Summary of Trade - Offs - Columns

1200

1000

800

600

400

200

0
Raw Designer Trade-Offs 1 Trade-Offs 2 Trade-Offs 3
Ranking

Structure Type 1 (LRFD) Structure Type 2 (ASD)

The graph shows that Design Type 2 (ASD) has dominated Design Type 1 (LRFD) in three trade-offs
having the highest ranking of 1000 for all of the trade-offs done.