Primary-Care Registered Nurse Telehealth Policy Implications

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Education and Practice

Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare


0(0) 1–4
Primary-care registered nurse telehealth ! The Author(s) 2020
Article reuse guidelines:
policy implications sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/1357633X20940142
journals.sagepub.com/home/jtt

Susan Watkins and Judy Neubrander

Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has drastically changed health-care delivery models within primary-care settings.
Primary-care providers are limiting routine care face-to-face office visits while triaging COVID-19 symptomatic patients
to hospital emergency rooms. Primary-care providers are rapidly adopting telehealth modalities for care provisions
during this unprecedented pandemic to allow practices to continue delivering primary care while preventing community
spread of COVID-19. Federal legislation has responded to emergent public-health needs by removing barriers that have
impeded widespread adoption of telehealth modalities. This legislation has omitted professional registered nurses (RNs)
from delivering reimbursable telehealth services, which is problematic for primary-care practice. RNs historically have
led telehealth service delivery and should therefore be included in new legislation as eligible health professionals per-
mitted to provide reimbursable telehealth services. RNs improve quality outcomes in primary care within innovative
team-based care models and are essential clinicians capable of providing ongoing care coordination and disease man-
agement for patients needing to stay on track with their usual care needs.

Keywords
Telecare, telehealth, telemedicine, telenursing
Date received: 8 April 2020; Date accepted: 11 June 2020

Accelerated Virtual Care Demand


during this unpredictable pandemic.1 Telehealth
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic modalities for delivering virtual health visits have
has accelerated the demand for health-care delivery attracted significant attention by primary-care practices
systems to enhance virtual care accessibility modalities during this unprecedented pandemic, although tele-
that promote cost-effective, high-quality and person- health has been an approved and reimbursable service
centred care. The COVID-19 public-health recommen- through the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Service
dations to minimize community viral spread are (CMS) since 1997.2
consequently devastating the financial viability of Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, less than 10% of
non-essential businesses, along with essential PCPs had adopted telehealth technology to conduct
community-based health-care entities.1 Primary-care virtual visits for reasons including complicated technol-
practices, although essential, have been required to ogy, patient confidentiality and reimbursement
reserve face-to-face visits for emergent care needs, obstacles.3 As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic,
along with encouraging patients with symptoms consis- CMS has expanded telehealth reimbursement through
tent with COVID-19 to stay at home or seek emergency the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security
room care.1 The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in (CARES) Act as an emergent response to the health-
primary-care practices experiencing significant staffing care market’s access and financial sustainability
furloughs, reduced visit capacity and decreased revenue
from face-to-face visits.1 Moreover, since many
primary-care practices still operate within fee- Mennonite College of Nursing at Illinois State University, USA
for-service reimbursement models that reward practi-
Corresponding author:
tioners based on face-to-face office visit volumes to Susan Watkins, Mennonite College of Nursing at Illinois State University,
generate revenue, primary-care providers (PCP) are 203 Edwards Hall Campus Box 5810, Normal, IL 61790, USA.
concerned about the financial viability of their practice Email: smwatk2@ilstu.edu
2 Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 0(0)

concerns.4 Along with the CARES Act, the Creating The CMS TCM and CCM provisions had a signif-
Opportunities Now for Necessary and Effective Care icant impact on widespread adoption for RNs support-
Technologies (CONNECT) for Health Act of 2019 ing non face-to-face reimbursable telehealth nursing
(CONNECT Act) will be proposed in 2021 in order services.6 CMS TCM and CCM provisions will need
to reduce Medicare telehealth obstacles within the to be expanded within state policies to increase nation-
Social Security Act.5 The CONNECT Act could also al implementation of telehealth platforms.2 Telehealth
renounce complicating telehealth live-video, asynchro- nursing services have become an essential team-based
nous store-and-forward, and originating patient/pro- primary-care chronic disease management and care
vider site and service modality requirement obstacles coordination commodity that supports population
that have hindered widespread adoption of telehealth health improvement efforts in the USA.6 Evidence sug-
services in primary care.5 These legislation efforts are gests telenursing services provide patients with addi-
significant benefactors to increasing widespread adop- tional accessibility and support for disease symptom
tion of telehealth within primary-care practices to allow monitoring and disease self-care guidance.7 Evidence
providers the capability of providing essential health- also supports a positive link between telenursing and
care services for acute illness and chronic disease man- improved diabetes glycaemic control.8 International
agement.1 However, registered professional nurses were evidence further supports telenursing as a safe, effective
omitted as eligible providers of reimbursable telehealth and high-quality remote access service for health
services within both of these Acts.4,5 This is a signifi- care.9–11
cant oversight, as CMS has permitted other non-face- Telehealth nursing practice leverages technology-
to-face registered nurse (RN) services to be billed and based communication platforms to provide distant
reimbursed under the supervising PCP to support nursing services to patients,12,13 including consultation,
chronic care management (CCM) and transitional assessment, monitoring, treatment and patient educa-
tion.14,15 Telehealth nursing accessibility reduces travel
care management (TCM).4 These approved non-
requirements, unnecessary provider visits and emergen-
face-to-face RN remote care services were influential
cy room unitisation while maintaining quality and effi-
to the US health-care system considering that CMS
ciency16,17 associated with improved patient outcomes
approval for reimbursement often signifies an interven-
and reduced health-care costs.2,18 Neither the CARES
tion’s potential for widespread utilization.6
or CONNECT Act legislation contain professional
TCM services were originated in 2013 by CMS to
RNs as an eligible provider of telehealth services.5
support beneficiaries transitioning from a hospital or
Instead, the proposed eligible health professionals
skilled nursing facility (SNF) to a community setting
within these Acts are: ‘physician assistant, nurse prac-
during the first 30 days after discharge.4 TCM was the
titioner, clinical nurse specialist, certified registered
first service that could be ordered by the PCP and
nurse anesthetist, certified nurse-midwife, clinical
supported by auxiliary personnel, such as RNs who social worker, clinical psychologist, and registered die-
provide the services directly face-to-face or non- titian or nutrition professional’.5 Professional RNs are
face-to-face as a therapeutic care coordination service key inter-professional team members within team-
under the ‘incident to’ benefit with PCP supervision.4 based primary-care models to support complex chronic
CCM services were originated by CMS in 2015 to qual- disease management and care coordination efforts.19
ifying beneficiaries having a minimum of two chronic RNs supply the largest health-care occupation20 and
diseases that increase risk of exacerbation and mortal- are well positioned to assume more telehealth roles
ity and who are established with a supervising PCP and while increasing revenue within pandemic-besieged pri-
a comprehensive care plan.4 The original CCM service mary care settings. The literature demonstrates that
in 2015 included up to 20 minutes per month of care RNs in team-based primary care partnerships are well
coordination and disease self-management support prepared to care for patients with chronic illness such
provided by a RN directly supervised by the PCP.4 In as congestive heart failure, diabetes and hypertension
2017, CMS increased payment under CCM for com- utilizing telehealth modalities.21
plex service delivery for consenting beneficiaries, which Telehealth nursing scopes and standards were first
includes moderate to high-complexity medical decision published in 2011 for ambulatory care RNs who pro-
making, and 60 minutes additional clinical staff time vide evidence-based telehealth services in accordance to
each month supervised by the PCP for disease self- American Academy of Ambulatory Care Nursing
management support.4 These complex CCM services guidelines.22 RNs have been utilizing e-visit tools, elec-
can be delivered by the RN as face-to-face or non- tronic health record portal platforms and digital mobile
face-to-face for consenting beneficiaries under the remote monitoring technology within ambulatory care
orders and supervision of the PCP to assist patients settings to provide asynchronous chronic disease guid-
with care coordination and disease management.4 ance, care plan evaluation and disease self-management
Watkins and Neubrander 3

through enriched communication modalities to support of Health and Human Services (HHS) as part of an award
patients as active participants in their care between totaling $2.729705m with 0% financed by non-governmental
provider visits.21,22 RNs also provide expert telehealth sources. The contents are those of the authors and do not
services for triaging patients to the appropriate level of necessarily represent the official views of, nor an endorsement
care, utilising clinical judgement, algorithms and by, HRSA, HHS or the US government.
evidence-based guidelines.22 The high-level RN knowl-
edge and skills of assessment paired with clinical deci-
sion expertise allow the RN to prioritise urgent care ORCID iD
needs, develop a plan of care in collaboration with Susan Watkins https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3119-8948
the multidisciplinary care team and provide supportive
patient education for treatment recommendations and References
evaluation of care outcomes.22 1. Primary Care Collaborative. Primary care and COVID-
RN telehealth supports population health, care 19: week 2 survey, https://www.pcpcc.org/2020/03/26/pri
coordination, transitional care, disease self- mary-care-covid-19-week-2-survey (2020, accessed 30
management support, wellness, symptom triage and March 2020).
palliative care for patients and families.22 Modern 2. Neufeld JD, Doarn CR and Aly R. State policies influ-
advancements in RN telehealth services using mobile ence Medicare telemedicine utilization. Telemed J E
devices and digital technologies are consistent with the Health 2016; 22: 70–74.
CMS definition of ‘telemedicine’. CMS defines ‘tele- 3. Peabody MR, Dai M, Turner K, et al. Prevalence and
medicine’ as utilizing virtual visit modalities to connect factors associated with family physicians providing
with health professionals ‘to exchange health care E-visits. J Am Board Fam Med 2019; 32: 868–875.
4. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Chronic Care
information in audio, video, graphic, or other format
Management Services, https://www.cms.gov/outreach-
for the purpose of providing improved health care serv-
and-education/medicare-learning-network-mln/mlnprod
ices’.23 RN-led telemedicine interventions have been
ucts/downloads/chroniccaremanagement.pdf (2018,
linked to improved disease self-management behaviors accessed 5 May 2020).
associated with reduced HbA1C levels and decreased 5. Dizon R. Federal CONNECT Act seeks to expand access
blood pressure levels.24 to telehealth in Medicare. https://www.telehealthresource
The omission of RNs as eligible telemedicine health center.org/federal-connect-act-seeks-to-expand-access-
professionals will intensify the unprecedented chal- to-telehealth-in-medicare/ (2020, accessed 2 April 2020).
lenges primary-care providers are facing related to the 6. Lister M, Vaughn J, Brennan-Cook J, et al. Telehealth
COVID-19 pandemic. It is essential for legislators to and telenursing using simulation for pre-licensure USA
recognize the urgent need for RNs to qualify as one of students. Nurse Educ Pract 2018; 29: 59–63.
the additional health professionals to provide 7. Gidora H, Borycki EM and Kushniruk AW. Effects of
reimbursable telehealth services to mitigate pandemic- telenursing triage and advice on healthcare costs and
associated health-care workforce shortages, accessibil- resource use. Stud Health Technol Inform 2019; 257:
ity to care and declining revenues associated with viral 133–139.
public-health infection control. RNs are well posi- 8. Yang S, Jiang Q and Li H. The role of telenursing in the
management of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-
tioned with the knowledge and skills to assist
analysis. Public Health Nurs 2019; 36: 575–586.
primary-care providers to continue serving the vulner-
9. Bikmoradi A, Masmouei B, Ghomeisi M, et al. Impact of
able patient populations who require high-quality coor-
tele-nursing on adherence to treatment plan in discharged
dinated and ongoing chronic disease self-management patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a
and transitional care services across the continuum of quasi-experimental study in Iran. Int J Med Inform
care within patient-centred medical home models.24 2016; 86: 43–48.
10. Goudarzian M, Fallahi-Khoshknab M, Dalvandi A,
Declaration of conflicting interests et al. Effect of telenursing on levels of depression and
The author(s) declare no potential conflicts of interest with anxiety in caregivers of patients with stroke: a random-
respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this ized clinical trial. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2018; 23:
article. 248–252.
11. Graversen DS, Christensen MB, Pedersen AF, et al.
Safety, efficiency and health-related quality of telephone
Funding
triage conducted by general practitioners, nurses, or
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial sup- physicians in out-of-hours primary care: a quasi-
port for the research, authorship and/or publication of this experimental study using the Assessment of Quality in
article: This project was supported by the Health Resources Telephone Triage (AQTT) to assess audio-recorded tele-
and Service Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department phone calls. BMC Fam Pract 2020; 21: 84.
4 Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 0(0)

12. Allen M, Aylott M, Loyola M, et al. Nurses: extending https://uscode.house.gov/browse.xhtml (2020, accessed
care through telehealth. Stud Health Technol Inform 8 March 2020).
2015; 208: 35–39. 20. Health Resources and Services Administration. The
13. Kumar S and Snooks H. Telenursing. London: Springer, future of the nursing workforce: national- and state-
2011, p.200. level projections, 2012–2025, http://bhpr.hrsa.gov/health
14. Reierson IÅ, Solli H and Bjørk IT. Nursing students’ workforce/supplydemand/nursing/workforceprojections/
perspectives on telenursing in patient care after simula- nursingprojections.pdf (2014, accessed 20 March 2020).
tion. Clin Simul Nurs 2015; 11: 244–250. 21. American Academy of Ambulatory Care Nursing.
15. Sevean P, Dampier S, Spadoni M, et al. Bridging Position paper: the role of the registered nurse in ambu-
the distance: educating nurses for telehealth practice. latory care, https://www.aaacn.org/sites/default/files/
J Contin Educ Nurs 2008; 39: 413–418. documents/PositionPaper.pdf (2017, accessed 2
16. Lustig TA. The role of telehealth in an evolving health care February 2020).
environment: workshop summary. Washington, DC: 22. American Academy of Ambulatory Care Nursing.
National Academies Press, 2012, pp.1–26. Telehealth nursing practice, https://www.aaacn.org/prac
17. Moehr JR, Schaafsma J, Anglin C, et al. Success factors tice-resources/telehealth (2020, accessed 1 January 2020).
for telehealth– a case study. Int J Med Inform 2006; 75: 23. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Trump
755–763. administration provides financial relief for Medicare pro-
18. Edirippulige S. Readiness of nurses for practicing tele- viders, https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/press-releases/
health. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010; 161: 49–56. trump-administration-provides-financial-relief-medicare-
19. United States of Representatives. Office of Law Revision providers (2018, accessed 5 May 2020).
Counsel United States Code 42 Section 1115A(b)(2)(B) of 24. Massimi A, De Vito C, Brufola I, et al. Are community-
the Social Security Act 42 U.S.C. 1315a(b)(2)(B), https:// based nurse-led self-management support interventions
uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=telehealth+service effective in chronic patients? Results of a systematic
s&f=treesort&fq=true&num=17&hl=true&edition= review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2017; 12: 1–22.
prelim&granuleId=USC-prelim-title42-section254c-14

You might also like