Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Your Chess Battle Plan - Mcdonald - 2020
Your Chess Battle Plan - Mcdonald - 2020
Your Chess Battle Plan - Mcdonald - 2020
The right of Neil McDonald to be identified as the author of this work has
been asserted in accordance with the Copyrights, Designs and Patents Act
1988.
Everyman is the registered trade mark of Random House Inc. and is used in
this work under licence from Random House Inc.
Index of Games
Introduction
The sixth world champion, Mikhail Botvinnik, described chess as the art of
logic. Indeed, if music is the art of sound, and dance is the art of movement,
then chess, as the greatest of intellectual games, is the art that most clearly
expresses decision making.
As the title of the book suggests, chess is also a war game. Nevertheless,
the competitive pleasure we get in beating our opponent and notching up a
point cannot be separated from the satisfaction of having our ideas tested and
validated. If this wasn’t so, we wouldn’t prize a win over a skilful player
more than that over a beginner. And the pain of losing for most players far
outweighs the joy of winning – not only has our opponent triumphed over us,
but our plans have been proved wrong.
Perhaps at the moment you see chess in terms of developing moves,
attacking moves and defensive moves. The purpose of this book is to show
you these things and a lot more. Imagine you have all your pieces in play in
an equal position where there is nothing to attack and no threat to deal with.
What should you do then? You should manoeuvre and probe, stop the
opponent carrying out the advances he wishes, fortify strong points, try to
create or seize control of holes, and so on. Such play is a direct challenge to
the opponent: it isn’t neutral. It forces him to keep up, to tread a fine line
between playing with too much energy or too little. If and when he slips up,
you will get the advantage. Then you will have something to build upon.
The games have been chosen not just for their instructional value but also
because I find them aesthetically pleasing. I hope you enjoy them and pick up
some good battle plans.
Neil McDonald,
Gravesend, January 2020
Chapter One
Improving the Activity of your Pieces
In a nutshell the purpose of a plan is to add energy to your pieces and pawns
while lessening the power of your opponent’s pieces and pawns. As the third
world champion José Raul Capablanca observed, the key theme which runs
through all phases of the game is the co-ordination of the pieces. You have to
get them working together.
As our first venture into planning we’ll study examples from the
endgame. This will allow us to examine planning in its purest form.
Compared with the middlegame or opening, there is less ‘noise’ or ‘clutter’ to
distract us from following the plan in question through its stages. Once we
have grasped the basics of strategy we can then apply it to the more complex
situations that arise in other phases of the game.
We’ll begin by looking at happy instances where you have succeeded in
paralysing or entombing the opponent’s pieces. In other words, you have
drained them of their energy. Your plan is to find a precise series of moves to
assure victory.
Game 1
And.Volokitin-S.Mamedyarov
European Cup, Eilat 2012
Question: Can you see the move for White that persuaded a world-class
player
to resign at once?
Answer: Black has two extra pawns, but after 34 g4! he immediately gave
up. An extreme example of reducing the energy level of the enemy pieces:
the black rook is entombed on h8.
Let’s imagine that Black had played on for a bit. If he just waits, a simple
winning plan for White would be to take on b2 and then march his king up
the board, capture on a6, and queen the a-pawn. White’s pieces have almost
unopposed power to manoeuvre, though he still has to be a tiny bit careful.
Let’s consider two ways Black might try to free his rook.
Game 2
P.Nikac-P.Dukaczewski
IBCA Championship, Cagliari 2019
It’s White to move. The diagram position is not yet an endgame, but
White is going to show us how to exchange to victory: when you have shut an
opponent’s piece out of the game, the simplest way to win is often to swap
off the other pieces to leave his army hopelessly outnumbered in an endgame.
Question: But to start with, can you see the move with which White
destroyed
the co-ordination of the black pieces?
Answer: Black’s rooks are just about holding out against the white passed
pawn. But with their queen hopelessly placed to offer any help, a charging
horse will provide the extra pressure to break their resistance.
30 Nd4! Kf8
The threat was 31 Nxe6+.
31 Nc6 Kg7 32 Na7 1-0
The barrier on c8 collapses. White wins a rook (to start with!).
Game 4
F.Caruana-S.Shankland
US Championship, St. Louis 2016
Answer: Black’s queen and rook are tied down to the defence of their
knight. The knight itself has no safe moves going forwards or sideways,
while retreating to d8 would drop the rook and going to b8 allow Ra8 with a
fatal pin. Meanwhile, the bishop is boxed in on f7 – after Black’s next move
it can only hobble between f7 and g8.
The black pieces are therefore completely dominated. Nevertheless, they
are holding on, if only by a thread. If Caruana wants to win he has to find a
way to snip that thread. His queen, rook and bishop are all excellently placed.
What he needs now is the help of his knight. It begins a long manoeuvre right
the way to b5, when the threat is Nc7, cutting off the defence of the black
knight by the rook.
43 Nf4 Kh7 44 Ng2!
A bit of readjustment as the route to b5 will be through e3.
44 ... Bg8 45 Ne3 Bf7 46 Nc2 Bg8 47 Na3 Bf7 48 Kf2!
Black is apparently paralysed, but not quite. If 48 Nb5?, the black knight
escapes its shackles with 48 ... Ne7!. Then 49 Qxe7 Qxb5 50 Ra7 would win
the bishop, but Black has enough for perpetual check with 50 ... Qb1,
intending 51 ... Qg1+ etc. If instead 49 Bxe7, Black regains the piece with 49
... Rb8 as White’s knight will fall. Finally, if 49 Ra7 then 49 ... Nf5+ (note
the importance of this being check as otherwise f7 would fall) 50 Kh3 Bg8
and Black has much improved his chances by getting his previously terrible
knight to the f5-square.
You always have to be vigilant when you have the opponent’s pieces
under lock and key. A resourceful opponent will be waiting for just such a
slip-up as 48 Nb5?.
Caruana decides that the best way to prevent any risk of a perpetual
check, such as we saw in a variation above, is to move his king over to the
queenside. The king will also be well out of the way of ... Nf5 coming with
check.
48 ... Bg8 49 Ke3
There is no need for White to investigate lines like 49 Nb5 Qf7!? (a
heroic move) 50 Qxc8 Qf4, when 51 Qxc6? Qd2+ again gives perpetual
check.
49 ... Bf7 50 Kd2 Bg8 51 Kc2 Bf7 52 Kc1
Caruana finally has his king where he wants him.
52 ... Kg8
If 52 ... Bg8 53 Nb5 Qf7, in the style of the note to move 49, White can
just take all the pieces with 54 Qxc8 Qxf3 55 Qxc6 as his king can easily
escape perpetual by moving up the queenside.
53 Nb5
After a rapid gallop from f4 to a3 in the space of five moves, the knight
had to wait on a3 for another six before completing the last step of its
journey. Now there’s nothing good Black can do against the threat of 54 Nc7,
blocking the rook’s defence of its knight.
53 ... Ne7 54 Na7! 1-0
As we saw above, 54 Qxe7? Qxb5 or 54 Bxe7? Rb8 (when b5 drops)
would be wrong steps for White. But now Black’s rook and knight are both
hanging and there are no more tricks.
Game 5
Y.Habu-G.Kasparov
Rapid Match, Tokyo 2014
Question: It is White’s move. Evaluate the position and decide on the
best
plans for White and Black. How should the players try to implement
them?
Game 6
S.Karjakin-W.So
FIDE Candidates, Berlin 2018
It’s White to play. “A child could have drawn this endgame,” said Wesley
So ruefully after the game.
Question: Nonetheless, can you list the sources of danger for Black in the
diagram position?
We can see from the assessment above that the white rook and knight are
already on optimum squares. So our task is to utilize our two reserve assets:
the king and the pawns.
27 e4!
The first step is to gain space. White intends f2-f4 and e4-e5 to establish a
pawn on e5. Then the black e6-pawn will be fixed as a permanent target. For
example, White could play Nd4 and tie down a black piece (very likely the
rook) to the pawn’s defence. Once White gets a pawn to e5 and brings his
king forward, Black can’t rely on simplification to save him – a king and
pawn endgame could turn out to be lost, as in the note to 32 ... Nh4 below.
27 ... Nc4
A sensible move to return the knight to the rest of Black’s army. In view
of the comment above, you might wonder why Black didn’t play 27 ... e5.
This puts the pawn on a safe square (that is, defended by its fellow pawn on
f6) and, at the same time, prevents the plan of f2-f4 and e4-e5 which aims to
fix it on e6 where it has to be defended by the rook.
Answer: Here again we see the power of the white knight. After 27 ... e5
28 Ne7+ Kh8 (or 28 ... Kf8 29 Nf5 likewise) 29 Nf5 it takes up a tremendous
post, attacking the g7-pawn. Now 29 ... Rg8 leaves the black rook and king
entirely boxed in, while after 29 ... g6 30 Ne3 it’s bad enough that Black has
a weak pawn on f6 that can be attacked by Nd5 or Ng4, but he also has the
problem of how to get his knight to safety as the c4 retreat square has been
removed.
28 Kd3
Bringing the king forwards. If now 28 ... Ne5+ 29 Nxe5 fxe5, Black has
got rid of the pesky white knight but loses a pawn after 30 Ra5.
28 ... Nd6 29 f4
29 ... Kf8
Black is impatient to free his rook and so prepares ... Rc8 without
allowing the fork on e7.
Answer: Instead, 29 ... h5! looks a good defensive move. After 30 e5 fxe5
31 fxe5 Nf5 the black knight has found a fairly stable post as it can’t be
kicked away by g2-g4 as in the game. This line shows the black pawns
haven’t lost all their vitality. Of course White doesn’t have to force the issue
with 30 e5. He could, for example, probe with 30 Ra5 h4 31 Ra7 in the hope
that the h4-pawn becomes a weakness in the future.
30 e5 fxe5 31 fxe5
White finally completes his plan of getting a pawn to e5. The e6-pawn is
now fixed.
31 ... Nf5 32 g4!
Due to Black’s omission of 29 ... h5 his knight now has to continue its
wandering.
32 ... Nh4
Question: Was there any hope in 32 ... Ne7 - ? Try to work out the king
and
pawn endgame that arises after exchanges on e7.
Answer: We see the power of the white e-pawn in the following variation
which shows Black can’t escape from the pressure through simplification: 32
... Ne7? 33 Nxe7 Rxe7 34 Rxe7 Kxe7 35 Kd4 Kd7 36 Kc5 Kc7 (Black has
the opposition and so keeps the enemy king out for the moment, but he is
going to run out of pawn moves and then have to give way) 37 g5 h6 38 gxh6
gxh6 39 h3 h5 40 h4 Kd7 (no more pawn moves, so Black will lose the e6-
pawn) 41 Kb6 Kd8 42 Kc6 Ke7 43 Kc7 Ke8 44 Kd6 Kf7 45 Kd7 Kf8 46
Kxe6 and White wins.
33 Kc4
Because there are so few pieces White has to make every unit work as
hard as possible. Now there are sinister ideas such as putting the king on d7,
in order to smother the black rook, or playing Kd6 and Nd4 to take on e6.
(Imagine if the king was already teleported to d6 with all the other pieces on
the same squares; then after 1 Nd4 the black rook would jump at the chance
to have revenge on the white knight with 1 ... Rd8+ 2 Kxe6 Rxd4, but alas his
king would be mated by 3 Ra8+ etc.)
33 ... Nf3
Trying to get the knight activated by attacking h2 and putting pressure on
e5.
34 Ra2
Threatening 35 Rf2. Black finds the only good defence.
34 ... Rc8! 35 Kb5
35 ... Ke8?
Question: Black had only one good defence and it’s difficult to find. But
have
a go anyway!
After 35 ... Ng5 36 Kb6 White can drive the black rook to e8 with 37
Kb7, then close in on it (and the e6-pawn) with 38 Kc7 and 39 Kd7.
However, there remained one fully adequate defence for Black:
Answer: 35 ... Rc7! and then:
a) 36 Rf2 Rf7 and if 37 Nd8? it’s trapper trapped after 37 ... Nd4+, while
37 Kb6? drops a pawn to 37 ... Nxe5!. White would have to run away with 37
Ra2, say, when 37 ... Rd7 is equal.
b) 36 Kb6 Rd7 (not 36 ... Rf7?? 37 Ra8 mate!) 37 Rf2 Rd3!. Perhaps
Wesley So missed this alternative way to defend the knight and keep the rook
active. White has no way to make progress.
36 Kb6
The black rook is paralysed by the white king and knight.
36 ... g5
If 36 ... Kf7 then 37 Rf2 wins the knight, while after 36 ... Kd7 37 Ra7+
the rook can scoff the kingside pawns while the black rook remains trapped.
That leaves the exchange sac 36 ... Rxc6+, but it is hopeless: 37 Kxc6
Nxe5+ 38 Kd6 Nxg4 39 Kxe6 Kd8 (an unfortunate necessity to stop mate) 40
h3 Nf6 41 Ra8+ Kc7 42 Ra7+ Kd8 43 Rxg7 Ne4 44 Ke5 (not falling for 44
Rxh7?? Ng5+) 44 ... Nf2 45 Rxh7 and White wins.
37 h3
37 ... Nxe5
Desperation. By defending g4 with his previous move Karjakin has made
an exchange sacrifice fruitless after 37 ... Rxc6+ 38 Kxc6 Nxe5+ 39 Kd6. If
instead 37 ... h6, White can go hunting the kingside pawns with 38 Ra7 and
39 Rh7, or simply play 38 Ra1, when 38 ... Nh4 39 Kb7 is lethal as 39 ... Kd7
40 Rd1+ wins the rook.
38 Nxe5 Rc3 39 Rh2
You can afford to play humble moves when you are a piece up.
39 ... Ke7 40 Kb5 Re3 1-0
Having reached the time control, Black resigned. White will exploit his
knight after 41 Nc4 etc.
Game 7
J.Valmana Canto-P.Harikrishna
Spanish League 2006
Answer: You might have noticed how the h-pawn is one move too slow
in the note to 35 ... a5. So, after 34 Ne2, let’s try 34 ... h5! at once. Then play
is more or less forced: 35 c4 h4 36 c5 h3 37 c6 h2 38 Kg2 (White is forced to
blink in the race between the pawns) 38 ... f3+ 39 Kxh2 fxe2 40 c7 e1Q 41
c8Q+ and again White queens with check, but after 41 ... Kf3 he is lost due to
Black’s excellently placed queen and king supporting their fearsome passed
pawn; e.g. 42 Qf5+ Ke2 43 Qc2+ Qd2 44 Qc4+ Kd1+ 45 Kh3 e2.
The move 34 ... f3? looks very natural, not least because it attacks the
white knight, but it turned out to be the fatal loss of a tempo. As we remarked
above, the pawn on h6 is like Cinderella, overlooked because of the loud and
glitzy pawns on e3 and f4. But she was the key to saving – and winning – the
game.
But we haven’t finished with this endgame.
Question: Returning to the diagram position before 34 Ne2, can you find
a
better plan for White?
Answer: White needed to block the advance of Black’s pawns with the
set-up: king on e2 and knight on f3. This can be done with 34 Ke2! (34 Nb5!
is also good enough) 34 ... h5 35 Nb5! h4 36 Nd4 h3 37 Nf3.
It might seem a bit profligate to move the white king and then play three
moves with the knight when there are passed pawns racing down the board.
But White has achieve a blockade of the black pawns which holds out long
enough for the c-pawn to come to his rescue: 37 ... Kg3 38 c4 h2 39 Nxh2
Kxh2 40 c5 Kg2 41 c6 f3+ 42 Kxe3 f2 43 c7 f1Q 44 c8Q Qe1+. Both sides
have queened and it’s a draw after 45 Kf4 Qd2+ 46 Ke4 Qxa2.
An instructive endgame. In Think Like A Grandmaster Kotov relates how
he and some colleagues were stumped when trying to find the winning
continuation in an endgame they were studying. They therefore asked
Capablanca’s advice. After a quick glance at the position, the Cuban world
champion simply pushed the pieces to the squares where they were needed
for the implementation of the correct plan. He then walked away and left the
other players to find the individual moves.
Let’s imagine the ghost of Capablanca was revisiting San Sebastian,
where the game above was played. (He had his great debut success there and
even ghosts get nostalgic.) He might have been tempted to push the white
king to e2 and the knight to f3 and then left the (terrified) players to find the
moves.
The moves you need to make are not too difficult to find once you know
the correct set-up, as Kotov also remarked about the set-up Capa showed
him.
Finally, it should be mentioned that 34 Ne2 is the proverbial ‘second-to-
last mistake’ which wins the game. If White had played the correct 34 Ke2,
Harikrishna would have replied 34 ... h5 and drawn, not having had the
opportunity to lose (after 34 Ne2?) with 34 ... f3?.
Game 8
C.N.Ross-E.Spinu
IBCA Olympiad, Ohrid 2017
A position with only six pieces but full of complexity. It turns out that
White can’t win by capturing both black pawns with his rook, as after 55
Rh8? f2 56 Rxh4+?? (instead, 56 Rf8! still holds a draw) 56 ... Ke3 57 Rh3+
Ke2 the black f-pawn queens.
Question: So can you think up a winning scheme for White?
Answer: The limited material on the board allows us to plan a long way
ahead. If White is to win, the process has to be:
1) Give up the rook for the f-pawn.
2) Capture the black h-pawn with his king.
3) Get his king off the h-file without being blocked in by the returning
black king.
4) Use his king to shut out the black king from stopping the white h-pawn
from queening.
As soon as the black king commits to supporting the advance of the f-
pawn a line of approach will open for the white king towards the h-file.
First of all, let’s see how the game ended:
55 Rf8
With the white king temporarily denied access to d5, it seems eminently
logical to begin by attacking the f-pawn, as the rook will have to go to f8
sooner or later to capture it. Now both kings go about their business. The
black king advances to support the f-pawn, while the white king tags along in
his wake and edges closer to the two h-pawns.
55 ... Ke3 56 Kd5 f2 57 h3
With his own king stymied, White moves his pawn and waits for the
black king to give way again.
57 ... Ke2 58 Ke4 f1Q 59 Rxf1 Kxf1
Question: Black has regained the rook. Is that enough to save the game?
Answer: To clinch the draw Black needs either to get his king back in
time to stop the h-pawn from queening or shut in the white king on the h-file
in front of the pawn. Alas for him, the journey proves too far after:
60 Kf3!
The only way. He has to head for the h-file while blocking for a vital
move the black king’s approach.
You can verify that it’s a draw after 60 Kf4? Kf2 61 Kg4 Ke3 62 Kxh4
Kf4 – the white king has been successfully shut in on the h-file. The black
king can move towards f8, and the white king will remain shut in on the h-
file if he tries to keep his opposite number from going to g8 and h8 to block
the h-pawn.
60 ... Ke1
Around about here Black started banging the clock loudly, either out of
frustration or the hope it would make his king jump a bit faster down the
board.
61 Kg4 Kf2 62 Kxh4 Ke3 63 Kg5
Just in time, before 63 ... Kf4 imprisons him. Black loses because his king
hasn’t been able to prevent the white king leaving the h-file and clearing the
way for the h-pawn to advance.
63 ... Ke4 64 h4 Ke5 65 h5 1-0
The white king can prevent the black king getting to f8 after 65 ... Ke6 66
Kg6 etc.
I was Chris Ross’ Second at the Chess Olympiad for Visually Impaired
players in 2017. It’s fair to say I was watching this game with turbulent
emotions as, due to White’s omission of h2-h3! and Black’s omission of ...
h4-h3!, the assessment went from White’s point of view: 55 Rf8 (equal!) 55
... Ke3 (winning for White!) 56 Kd5 (equal!) 56 ... f2 (winning again!), when
Chris finally played 57 h3 and I could relax.
Game 9
Ma.Carlsen-Yu Yangyi
Stavanger 2019
Question: It is White to play. Would you grab the pawn on c6?
Answer: Well, after 23 Bxc6 Rc8 you can support the bishop with 24 d5
(this is necessary as the c-pawn will drop if the bishop retreats). Then White
has connected passed pawns in the centre. Surely that is the way to go? Let’s
see how the game might continue:
24 ... Rb8
Black has an active rook, whose power can be further increased by 25 ...
Rb2, seizing the seventh rank. Meanwhile, White has been forced to advance
24 d5 which has blocked in his bishop on c6 and conceded the c5-square to
Black’s bishop. We could imagine Black generating counterplay with ... Rb2
and ... Bc5, attacking the pawn on f2.
The white pawns have been compromised. They have lost their
dynamism. Imagine if White’s pawn were still on d4. Then he would have the
plan of Bf3 followed by the pawn advance c3-c4-c5. His pawns would roll
through the centre. Instead, once White is committed to 24 d5, Black has a
dark square blockade. Nimzowitsch remarked many years ago that when a
pawn structure is prevented from advancing, the square to which it is
prevented from advancing automatically becomes a strong point for the
opponent. Here c5 is a great square for the black bishop.
An active black rook, a black bishop with a great blockade square, a
neutered white centre, a white bishop inert on c6 – well, 23 Bxc6 isn’t
looking so attractive now. Note that Black has to throw in the move 23 ...
Rc8! to force 24 d5 before playing 24 ... Rb8. If he played 23 ... Rb8 at once,
then 24 c4 gets the pawns rolling, and if 24 ... Rc8 then 25 Bd5! (under no
circumstances 25 d5) and White is ready for 26 c5.
Instead, Carlsen played 23 c4!
Rather than be turned into weaklings the white centre pawns maintain
their potency.
23 ... Rc8
What else? After 23 ... Rb8 24 c5 Be7 25 Bxc6 the white centre can’t be
restrained: 25 ... Rd8 is met by 26 Ba4!, guarding the rook on d1 to rule out
26 ... Bxc5. White can then build up by centralizing his king.
24 c5 Be7
By avoiding the temptation to take on c6, Carlsen has reduced the black
rook to a defensive role and denied the black bishop a safe and strong square
on c5. It is now time to bring the king into the battle.
25 Kf1 f5
Yu Yangyi is a world-class player. He knows his only chance is to utilize
his kingside pawn majority to dislodge the white bishop from f3 and with
luck (a commodity normally in short supply when facing Carlsen) create a
passed pawn.
26 Ke2 g5 27 h3 Kg7 28 Kd3 Kg6
With the white king on its optimum square defending the d4-pawn it is
now time to activate the rook on the seventh rank.
29 Rb1 h5 30 Rb7 Bf6
Question: Now White can grab material with 31 Rxa7. Any thoughts on
why Carlsen declined the opportunity?
31 Rd7!
Once again we see Carlsen spurn the chance of bagging a pawn in order
to prevent his opponent freeing his rook from the defence of c6.
Answer: If 31 Rxa7 then 31 ... g4 32 hxg4 hxg4 33 Be2 (alas for White
he can’t play the bishop manoeuvre we see in the game, as after 33 Bd1
Black has a skewer with 33 ... Bxd4!, when 34 Kxd4 Rd8+ 35 Ke3 Rxd1
regains the piece with good drawing chances due to his nimble rook) 33 ...
Rd8 34 Ra4 Rh8 and the rook will generate counterplay with 35 ... Rh2.
Things would remain difficult for Black, but Carlsen wants to give him
no hope whatsoever: Slow but inexorable is the motto of the world champion
in a winning position. By putting the rook on d7 he stops any skewer with ...
Bxd4 after his next move and threatens to win the key pawn on c6 after 32
Rd6. Black therefore has little choice but to drive the white bishop back.
31 ... g4 32 Bd1! Kg5
32 ... Rb8 33 Ba4 Rb2 34 Bxc6 is also hopeless for Black, as White’s
passed pawns are much too fast.
33 Ba4!
The bishop has ricocheted from f3 to d1 to a4 and is once again attacking
the c6-pawn.
33 ... f4
Question: How should we put a stop Black’s kingside counterplay?
Answer: 34 f3!
Yu was aiming to create a passed pawn with 34 ... f3 35 gxf3 gxh3. Here
we see the inherent defect of a pawn majority that contains a doubled pawn:
even if Black got his pawn from f7 to f5 he still couldn’t create a passed
pawn just by advancing his pawn mass, assuming his opponent was vigilant.
34 ... Re8
A last attempt for activity.
35 fxg4 hxg4 36 hxg4 Re6
Or 36 ... Kxg4 37 Bxc6 and White’s bishop very conveniently defends the
g2-pawn against attack by 37 ... Kg3.
37 Bd1!
Now the bishop keeps the black king out by guarding g4.
37 ... Re3+ 38 Kc4 a5 39 Bf3
And here we are again, with the bishop back on f3 attacking c6. It also
destroys Black’s last chance of gaining counterplay by capturing the pawn on
g2.
I wonder what odds you could get on Magnus playing 39 d5??, allowing
39 ... Rc3 mate.
39 ... Ra3 40 Bxc6 Rxa2 41 Be4
The c-pawn will win the pawn race, as White’s king is at hand to deal
with the a-pawn.
41 ... a4 42 c6 Ra1 43 c7 a3 44 Kb3! 1-0
But not 44 c8Q?? Rc1+ 45 Kb3 Rxc8.
Game 10
V.Kramnik-S.Shankland
Wijk aan Zee 2019
Kramnik decided he would retire from classical chess at the end of the
2019 Tata Steel tournament, thus bringing down the curtain on a wonderful
career which included wresting the world championship from Kasparov in
2000. This game was played in the last round of the tournament. There is
something hard about saying goodbye to something which has defined your
life, as Kasparov found when he lost the last game of his classical career to
Topalov at Linares in 2005.
Kramnik fared no better. In the diagram position, instead of forcing an
immediate draw with 50 Bxa6 Rxa6 51 Rxb2, he “raged against the dying of
the light” with:
50 Ba2?
Despite White’s nominal material advantage, he has no chance to win due
to the power of the passed pawn on b2. His rook and bishop are both tied
down to stopping the pawn. Perhaps he hoped that his king would be able to
enter the fray and release his pieces but, as we shall see, that isn’t possible.
Furthermore, Black’s king can easily advance to d4, and the space advantage
conferred by the pawn on e4 becomes a vital factor.
Question: How do you think Black built up his game?
Game 11
A.Giri-F.Caruana
Wijk aan Zee 2013
Question: Can you suggest what White’s plan should be and how to
implement it?
A splendid way to activate the rook. Instead, the computer program wants
to show off with the spectacular 25 Rh5 g6 26 Qf5!. The point is 26 ... gxf5
27 Rg5 mate; or 26 ... Ne5 27 Qf6, when the capture on e5 with 28 Bxe5
wins whether or not Black takes the rook; or finally 26 ... Qd6 27 Rxh7! Ne5
(to delay mate on h8) 28 Qf4 Kxh7 29 Bxe5 Qe7 30 Bf6, clearing the way for
the mating 31 Qh4+ unless Black gives up his queen.
Nice variations to analyse. But if and when you have the chance to show
off against Caruana, or whoever is rated world number five at the time –
don’t do it! Play the moves that kill him dead in the quickest and simplest
manner. (Perhaps here I should point out I wish Caruana a long and
prosperous life; we are talking purely about chess matters.)
Don’t jeopardize a big win. On the other hand, if you are playing a
friendly club game or a tournament game of no great value, it could be worth
seeking adventure with 26 Qf5 to sharpen your tactical imagination.
25 ... Re8 26 Rg5 g6 27 Bd5
Zugzwang
The most extreme form of denying the opponent healthy options is to put him
in zugzwang. Then his pieces are completely dominated and any move he
makes will lead to disaster.
Game 12
V.Belov-B.Socko
Hastings 2004/05
It’s Black to move. He isn’t material down or facing mate, but still Black
resigned.
The reason is zugzwang. His rook is shut in and his bishop and knight
have no safe moves. If he plays 44 ... Kf8 then 45 Nxd7+ Rxd7 46 Rb8 wins
the horse as 46 ... Rd8 47 d7+ is a decisive discovered check. This line only
works for White because the black king has moved from e8 – otherwise Nxd7
could be safely answered by ... Kxd7.
Black has a couple of pawn moves available, but White can quietly move
his king until they are exhausted.
Game 13
O.Tuka-P.Nikac
IBCA Championship, Cagliari 2019
Game 14
Hou Yifan-H.Toufighi
Subic Bay 2009
Once again zugzwang will be our weapon of choice to incapacitate the
enemy pieces. Black is threatening mate in one, but Hou Yifan had prepared
a winning simplification.
Question: Try to discover her combination – it’s long but pretty much all
forced.
Game 15
Wang Yue-T.Radjabov
FIDE Grand Prix, Sochi 2008
A doubled pawn is often a fatal liability in a simplified endgame. If we
add in White’s well-centralized king and advanced passed pawn there doesn’t
seem to be much hope for Black. Still, it isn’t obvious how White should
proceed. He’d like to infiltrate with his king on the queenside and capture the
b-pawns, which can’t be defended by the black king. But how? Black’s
bishop and b-pawns are combining well to shut out the white king who
cannot break through via c6, c5, c4 or c3 into the black queenside. The black
king meanwhile will go to e7 next move to guard the d6-square.
There is no obvious continuation, so we need to devise a plan.
Question: Before going further, can you work out how we can use
zugzwang to break through Black’s fortress?
Question: How can Wang Yue add the pawn on b6 to his trophy
collection?
Answer: First of all His Majesty returns to his optimum square on d5.
49 Kc3 Be2 50 Kd4 Bb5 51 Kd5 Ba4
The black bishop has to stay on the a4-e8 diagonal to prevent Kc6.
Therefore White will build up with b2-b4, Bc8, e5-e6 and Bd7!. Then he
wins the king and pawn endgame with the help of zugzwang if Black
exchanges bishops, or else penetrates with the king to c6 if the black bishop
runs away.
52 b4 Bb5 53 Bg4 Ba4 54 Bc8 Kd8
Or 54 ... Bb5 55 e6 Ba4 56 Bd7! (an offer that is fatal whether accepted
or declined) 56 ... Bxd7 (or 56 ... Bb3+ 57 Kc6 as in the game) 57 exd7 Kxd7
58 g4! (depriving Black of pawn moves on the kingside to create zugzwang)
58 ... Kc7 59 b5 (or similarly 59 h3 Kd7 60 b5) 59 ... Kd7 60 h3 Kc7 (Black
has no choice but to give way) 61 Ke6 and White wins.
55 Ba6 Kd7
If 55 ... Ke7 then 56 b5! shuts out the black bishop and so threatens Kc6,
while 56 ... Kd7 57 e6+ Kc7 58 Ke5 and 59 Kf6 breaks in via the kingside.
56 e6+ Ke7 57 Bc8 Bb5 58 Bd7!
If Black now exchanges bishops it’s like in the note to 54 ... Kd8 above.
58 ... Be2 59 Kc6
Finally, the white king gets to demolish what was left of the queenside
fortress.
59 ... b5 60 Kb6 Bc4 61 Bxb5 Bxe6 62 Kc7 1-0
The e-pawn for the b-pawn was a good swap for White. Even if Black
gives up the bishop for the b-pawn he won’t be able to liquidate the kingside
pawns to achieve a draw.
It’s White to move. Later in the book we shall see Caruana save himself
against Carlsen by exchanging off into a rook and knight versus rook book
draw. Here Georg Meier is tantalizingly close to pulling off the same trick,
but his rook is hanging.
71 Ra1?
Allowing the white king to be driven to the back rank with fatal
consequences.
Answer: In contrast, after 71 Rd1! g3+ 72 Ke2! the white rook can block
the check 72 ... Rb2+ with 73 Rd2, when 73 ... Rxd2+ 74 Kxd2 Kg4 75 Ke2
draws. Black can instead continue to probe with say 72 ... Ke4, but White
holds on after 73 Rd7.
71 ... g3+ 72 Kg1
72 Ke2 Rb2+ wins the knight.
72 ... Nf3+ 73 Kh1
Or 73 Kf1 Rb2, when mate on f2 is a decisive threat.
73 ... Rb2!
White’s pieces are now under great stress. His king is deprived of any
move and mate will follow on h2 if his knight ventures from g2 without
giving a check. Meanwhile, his rook has to stay on the first rank to prevent ...
Rb1+, again unless it gives a check. Vachier-Lagrave’s task is to crowd out
the white rook by depriving it of all safe squares on the first rank. He
envisages a position where he has his own rook on f2 and his king on b2,
with the white rook on d1 and all the other pieces on the same squares as at
the moment. Then if it is White to move it will be zugzwang.
Imagine if the white king were on h1 here, rather than g1. White would
be able to answer 82 ... Nf3 (no check!) with 83 Rb1+, avoiding being
zugzwanged, while after 82 ... Kb2 83 Re1 (not 83 Rxd4?? Rf1 mate) 83 ...
Nf3 84 Rd1 we have the position reached in the game at move 83 below but
with Black, not White, to move – so again there is no zugzwang. This shows
how clever it was to persuade White to put his king on g1 before setting off
with the king to b2.
82 ... Nf3+ 83 Kh1 Kb2
The black king has finally reached its destination. The white pieces are
absolutely dominated as the rook dare not leave the first rank, due to mate on
f1, but has no other safe squares along it.
84 Rg1 Nxg1 85 Kxg1
A last try. There still remains some excitement: will Meier be able to
reach a book draw by eliminating the black pawn?
85 ... Kc3 86 Ne3 Kd3 87 Nf1 Ke2 88 Nxg3+ Kf3
89 Nf5
The knight will be slowly but surely cornered. Alas for White, it can’t
stay safely near the king; for example, 89 Nf1 Rg2+ 90 Kh1 Rc2 91 Nh2+ (or
91 Kg1 Rc1, picking up the knight) 91 ... Kf2 92 Ng4+ Kg3 and both the
king and horse are doomed.
89 ... Rd2 90 Nh4+ Kg3 91 Nf5+ Kg4 92 Ne3+ Kf3 93 Nf5 Rd5 94 Ne7
Rc5 0-1
A possible finish is 95 Kh2 Kf4 96 Kg2 Kg5 97 Kf3 Kf6 98 Ng8+ Kg7
99 Ne7 Kf7 and the knight drops.
Game 17
A.Grischuk-B.Gelfand
FIDE Grand Prix, Khanty-Mansiysk 2015
It is Black to move. Given the chance White will recentralize his knight
with 18 Nc4 and put pressure on the d6-pawn. Therefore Gelfand has to take
some forceful measures.
18 ... a6! 18 Qb6
After 18 Qb3 b5 the c4-square is guarded and the white knight remains
passive on a3.
18 ... d5!
Not so much a freeing move as a preventive move. Once again it is
necessary to deny the white knight the c4-square.
19 exd5 Rxd5
This is the principled recapture, as reducing material by exchanging rooks
should ease Black’s game; though after 19 ... exd5 play was likely to
transpose in any case with 20 Rxd5 etc.
20 Rxd5 exd5 21 Rxd5
If White avoids snaffling the pawn he has the worst of it, as his offside
knight is a greater liability than Black’s isolated queen’s pawn (or IQP).
21 ... Nb4
The point of Black’s little combination. He regains his pawn with
equality.
Game 18
Vl.Fedoseev-S.Shankland
Wijk aan Zee 2019
Answer: If he doesn’t do something fast Black will play 23 ... Nc6 and 24
... Nd4, putting his knight on a magnificent outpost square. The horse would
dominate the centre, leaving White struggling to draw. Therefore urgent
preventive measures, or prophylaxis, are needed to fight Black’s plan. Once
the knight gets to c6 it will be too late, so Fedoseev played:
23 Qe3!
A quiet queen move which will decide the course of the game. Black
can’t play 23 ... Nc6 as 24 Na4 wins the c5-pawn.
23 ... Qc7 24 Bf3
The space-gaining 24 h4 might have been played straight away.
24 ... Qe7
Still not 24 ... Nc6? due to 25 Qxc5.
Question: The positional threat of 25 ... Nc6 and 26 ... Nd4 has re-
emerged.
How should we pre-empt it this time?
42 f6!
42 Nd3 is also good enough. But not 42 Nxa6?, as Shankland had
prepared an amazing variation: 42 ... Qf2+ 43 Kh3 Re8! 44 Rd3 Bxf5!! (the
white bishop has to be deflected so that it doesn’t control e2) 45 Bxf5 Re3+
46 Rxe3 Qxe3+ 47 Kg2 Qe2+ and Black has escaped with perpetual check.
42 ... Rg8
After 42 ... Rxc5 there is the cute reply 43 Qe7!; e.g. 43 ... Qxe7 (or 43 ...
Rc7 44 fxg7+ and mate next move) 44 fxe7 Nc7 45 Rd7 Bg8 46 Rxc7 and
White wins.
With the black rook forced to a passive square, the rest is a carve-up:
43 Qxa6 Qxc5 44 fxg7+ Rxg7 45 Rd8+ Bg8 46 Qxh6+ Rh7 47 Qf6+
Rg7 48 Rd4!
This was the last chance to fall for a perpetual check after 48 h6?? Qf2+.
48 ... Qe7 49 Qxe7 Rxe7 50 Rd8 Re3 51 h6 Re1 52 c5 1-0
Game 19
Vl.Fedoseev-A.Giri
Wijk aan Zee 2019
The bishop targets the d3-pawn, which will soon become the base of
White’s pawn chain, and also controls a6, so that the knight can be brought
into the attack (see move 24).
23 Ra3
Fedoseev accepts his pawn chain being broken up. He hopes to elevate
the b-pawn from the status of ‘weak isolated pawn’ to ‘strong passed pawn’.
23 ... bxc2 24 Qxc2 Na6 25 b4 Bg5!
An indirect attack on the b4-pawn.
26 Rf3
White can’t avoid the exchange of dark-squared bishops as 26 Be1 Be3
leaves him too passive.
26 ... Rb6
Black doesn’t want to play 26 ... Bxd2 27 Qxd2, since he has conceded
the c1-h6 diagonal to the white queen. Giri’s move defends his knight and so
permits the bishop to retreat from b5. This would expose the b4-pawn to
frontal attack. White puts a stop to the idea with his next move.
27 Qa2!
The queen adds to the pressure down the a-file and also eyes the f7-
square, which dissuades Black from developing his rook from f8.
27 ... Bf4!?
It’s always difficult to judge the right moment to ‘go for it’. When should
you switch from quiet manoeuvring to direct aggression? Steinitz famously
said that when you have the advantage you must attack, or else the advantage
will disappear. It’s good advice not to shilly-shally when carrying out a direct
assault on the enemy king, as time is usually a key factor. You want to mate
or at least persuade your opponent to shed lots of material to avert it. If you
play with insufficient energy he might be able to bring up reinforcements, or
strengthen his defences, or even run away with his king.
The situation here is different as there is no mating attack or indeed any
objective advantage for Black. On the other hand, throughout the
middlegame once Giri found 20 ... Bf6!, the position has been harder to play
for White. He has had to hold together a large and unwieldy pawn structure.
Giri could have kept up simmering pressure with the quiet 27 ... Qe7, when
the queen lends a hand in the defence of f7. White doesn’t seem to have any
constructive plan to improve his position. For example, if after 28 Rf1 Nc7 he
tries to exploit the pin on c7 with 29 Ra7, Black has 29 ... Ra6! 30 Rxa6
Nxa6, when the exchange of rooks has reduced White’s dynamism and made
the b4-pawn more of a target. This would be a slow, positional approach by
Black, not forcing matters and trying to wear White down.
In contrast, 27 ... Bf4 leads to a sharp tactical struggle. It is a highly tricky
move and therefore a good practical choice against an opponent I’m
assuming (based on the high number of mistakes which follow) was in time
trouble. The pawn structure becomes broken and messy, and it is hard for
White to keep his scattered pieces safely defended. His king also becomes
vulnerable to tactical themes. It is no real surprise when he collapses, despite
the claims of computer programs that he was doing fine.
28 Bxf4 exf4 29 Ne2?
If anyone has the better of it after 29 Rxf4 Nxb4 30 Qd2 Qg5 31 Rf2!
Qxd2 32 Rxd2 Nc6, it is White.
29 ... Nxb4 30 Qd2 d5!
Question: Giri deserves credit for the energy of his attack, but can you
see
how to hold it together as White?
31 Nxf4?
Answer: White missed the path to equality with 31 Qxb4 dxe4 32 Rxf4
Bxd3 33 Qxd4! (after 33 Qd2 Qb8! Black’s threats include 34 ... g5, 34 ...
Bxe2 and 34 ... Rb2) 33 ... Bxe2 34 Qxd8 Rxd8 35 Rxe4. Notice that in this
variation and the one at move 29 the correct path for White involved
exchanging off the queens. The old rules hold true!
31 ... Nxd3 32 Nxd5?
White’s position continues to slide downhill. There is an interesting
imbalance of material after 32 Raxd3 Bxd3 33 Qxd3 dxe4 34 Qxe4 Re8 35
Qd3 Qd6 36 h4 (stopping 36 ... g5) 36 ... Rc6 37 Qd2 etc.
32 ... Qd6+ 33 Rg3 Qxa3 34 Nxb6 Qd6 35 Nd5 Bc4
Black is clearly better due to the pin on g3, his passed pawn, base on e5
for the knight, and more active bishop.
36 f6?
Threatening 37 Qh6, but 36 Qa5 was the last chance to hold it together.
36 ... Bxd5 37 Qxd3
Perhaps Fedoseev was counting on 37 exd5 but missed the strength of 37
... Nf4!, and if 38 Qxd4 Black wins with 38 ... Ne2.
37 ... Be6 38 Kg1
Making things a bit easier for Black. However, in view of the awkward
position of the white pieces, including the terrible bishop on g2 (what did it
do in the game?) White won’t be able to prevent the advance of the passed
pawn. If 38 Qd2 then 38 ... Bc4 (threatening 39 ... Qxf6) or 38 ... Qe5 stops
any mating threats.
38 ... Bc4! 39 Qf3
Or 39 Qxc4 Qxg3.
39 ... d3 40 e5 Qxe5 41 Qe3 Re8! 0-1
Game 20
Ma.Carlsen-A.Grischuk
Shamkir 2019
Grischuk has just played 28 ... c5. Given the chance his plan would be
something like as follows (for the sake of clarity we only give Black’s
moves):
Step one: 29 ... c4, toshut in White’s bishop on a2, open his own bishop’s
diagonal and create an outpost square on d3.
Step two: 30 ... exf4. Black would like to play 30 ... Nc5 at once, but this
would allow 31 fxe5, when 31 ... Rxe5 32 Bf4 costs him the exchange; hence
he begins by swapping on f4. We assume White recaptures with 31 gxf4, as
after 31 Bxf4 Black would stick his knight on the fine e5 blockade square.
Step three: 31 ... Nc5. Here White would defend his e-pawn from capture.
If he played it to e5 Black could retreat his rook to d7 and then carry on with
his plan.
Step four: 32 ... Nd3. Hey presto! Black’s knight reaches a dominant
outpost supported by the pawn on c4. His bishop also controls a long open
diagonal. White is in danger of falling into a positional stranglehold.
Returning to the diagram position, White could ward off the danger from
... c5-c4 with 29 c4! or 29 b3!, when his bishop pair gives him a promising
game in either case. But these moves would at least temporarily block in his
own light-squared bishop. Carlsen sees there is another way to stop 29 ... c4.
He will be able to activate both of his bishops and his rooks, and keep the
black knight and bishop passive – and all for the price of a pawn!
He did it with:
29 Be3! exf4
If Black refuses the offer, he is suffering for nothing.
30 gxf4!
There’s no going back. After 30 Bxf4? Ne5 the energy drains from the
white position. His rooks remain passive and the light-squared bishop is
denied an open b1-h7 diagonal. Meanwhile, Black’s knight has found an
ideal centre post.
30 ... Rxe4 31 Bb1 Re7 32 Rfe1
Question: What has White gained from his sacrifice?
Once again Black faces the tactic 35 Bxc5!, when 35 ... Rxe2 (or 35 ...
Bxc5 36 Rxe7) 36 Bxd6+ and 37 Rxe2 wins for White.
34 ... Nd5
Stopping the threat but falling prey to a pin on the d-file.
35 Rd2 Rd8 36 Be4
Not 36 Red1?? Rxe3+.
36 ... Red7 37 Red1 Nf6
Black avoids losing a piece, but the forced simplification leaves him
unable to defend his queenside pawns against the ferocious white bishops.
38 Rxd7 Nxd7
Or 38 ... Rxd7 39 Rxd7 Nxd7 40 Bb7 Nb8 41 b4 Ke7 42 bxc5 and wins.
39 Rd6 1-0
After 40 Rxa6 White will soon push the passed a-pawn through.
This was not just a magnificent positional display. Carlsen showed his
shrewdness in seizing the initiative with a pawn sacrifice. It was a good
practical chance and there was no real risk of losing. If his opponent had
found 32 ... Nb8 White might not have won, but that’s life!
Game 21
I.Ivanisevic-V.Ivanchuk
European Championship, Batumi 2018
Question: Can you see something more aggressive and stronger for
Black?
Answer: It’s very natural to double rooks, but the direct 28 ... Qf5!,
intending ... Qf3, would have been very strong. For example, 29 Qe2 Rd8
threatens 30 ... Rd2! 31 Qxd2 Qf3 32 Kf1 (or else mate on g2) 32 ... Qg2+ 33
Ke2 Bf3 mate. Then 30 f4 Qc5 leaves White with a weak pawn on e3 and an
exposed second rank. If 31 Rxc3 bxc3, the passed pawn plus 32 ... Rd2 would
be too much to bear; while 31 Rcd1 Rxd1 32 Bxd1 (other recaptures drop e3)
32 ... Ra3 means that a2 falls; finally, 31 Ra1 is truly miserable after 31 ...
Rdd3 etc.
29 Qd2 Qc5
Another solid and good positional move, but here 29 ... Qh5! 30 Bd1 Qh3
looks very strong. Perhaps Ivanchuk was in his habitual time trouble and so
underestimated his attacking chances against the white king.
30 Rcd1
At last White has the chance for counterplay with a check on d7.
30 ... Bd3!
As so often in this game the black bishop slams the door in the face of the
white pieces.
31 e4 Bb5
Guarding the d7-square and preparing to go to c6 in some cases.
32 Qd4
White hopes the exchange of queens will ease his cramp and make b4 a
target. However, the black rooks are now able to infiltrate down the c-file.
32 ... Qxd4 33 Rxd4 Rc1 34 Rxc1
This leads to a king hunt, but the alternative 34 Rdd1 Rxd1 35 Rxd1 Be2
36 Re1 Bf3 is ugly for White as his king will stay passive and e4 is a target.
34 ... Rxc1+ 35 Kg2
Instead, 35 Rd1 Rxd1+ 36 Bxd1 Bc4 37 Bb3 Bxb3 38 axb3 Kd6 is a lost
pawn endgame for White as the black king invades via c5 (or e5) and d4.
35 ... Bf1+ 36 Kf3 Rc3+ 37 Kg4 Be2+ 38 Kh3 g5!
The position has grown exciting. Black can’t defend b4 but has a
potential mating net around the white king.
39 Rxb4?
He had to make air for his king with 39 f4!, when 39 ... g4+? 40 Kh4 Rc1
41 Kh5! is suddenly winning for White. Instead, 39 ... gxf4 40 Kg2 (not 40
Rxb4 f3 and the pawn queens) 40 ... fxg3 (avoiding 40 ... f3+ 41 Kf2) 41
hxg3 Bb5 42 Rxb4 Bc6 keeps winning chances for Black, though White is
still strongly resisting.
39 ... h5!
The net tightens with the threat of mate on f1.
40 Kg2 Bf3+ 41 Kh3 Rc1 0-1
There is nothing to be done about 42 ... Rg1 followed by 43 ... Bg2 mate or
43 ... Bg4 mate.
Chapter Three
Full Grovel Mode
It happens to us all. We started out with the best of intentions: we were going
to play a fine positional game, organizing our pieces well and keeping our
pawn structure in trim. But here we are after 28 moves looking in disgust at
our backward pawn and the ugly holes on our dark squares. Then our gaze
switches to the opponent’s fine centre and his excellent bishop pair. Lucky
fellow. We can’t help shaking our heads in annoyance and asking ourselves:
where did it all go wrong?
Or at least that’s what Caruana might have been thinking when he
reached the position in the diagram below. But one thing is certain: a world-
class player isn’t going to cave in. He is going to devise a plan which offers
the maximum resistance. After all a half point saved can make all the
difference to the final tournament result – or maybe decide whether you
remain world champion or not! After he saved an unpleasant endgame
against Caruana in game two of his 2018 world championship match,
Magnus Carlsen described such last-ditch defence wryly as “full grovel
mode”.
Game 22
M.Vachier Lagrave-F.Caruana
Stavanger 2018
It’s Black to play. White has the advantages outlined above. Perhaps I
should take the chance to define what I mean by a backward pawn. It sits on
an open file, isn’t advanced beyond say the third rank and, crucially, can’t be
defended by another pawn. In the diagram position the pawn on b7 fits those
criteria, though a purist might argue it’s not a true backward pawn as it can
advance to b5 and be defended by the pawns adjacent to it. My reply would
be: the b7-pawn is never going to advance to b5.
A backward pawn could well become a weakness as it lacks both a pawn
to defend it or the mobility to spring forwards when attacked. And it will be a
nuisance for any piece that gets consigned to protecting it. Furthermore, the
square in front of the backward pawn could also become a useful base for an
enemy piece, especially if it is in the centre. For more discussion of backward
pawns see Chapter Five and especially the game Nisipeanu-Radjabov.
We should return to our game. Another advantage White possesses is the
chance to engineer a breakthrough in the centre with d4-d5. If I remember
correctly Vachier-Lagrave went into the confessional booth around about
here (a soundproof room where players were allowed to give their opinions
of games as they were in progress). He said he thought he should win! But
Caruana found a great way to reorganize his pieces.
29 ... Ng8!
The plan is to go ... Be6 (to fight against the d4-d5 advance and vacate
the f5-square) and then ... Ne7-f5. On f5 the knight will attack d4 and also be
able to exchange itself on e3 if White’s dark-squared bishop has become
threatening.
29 Rb4 Rd7 30 Bg2
Now 31 d5 is a huge positional threat: the bishop on g2 would exert its
power against the fragile black queenside pawns, and the bishop on e3 would
gain a strong square on d4.
30 ... Ne7
Just in time. Here MVL (the acronym by which Maxime Vachier-Lagrave
is apparently happy to be known) seems to have anticipated Caruana’s plan
and realized he no longer had winning chances. He therefore prepared a line
leading to a completely drawn opposite-coloured bishop endgame.
31 h4 Be6 32 Be4 Nf5
Completing his excellent defensive manoeuvre.
33 d5 cxd5 34 cxd5 Bxd5 35 Bxf5 gxf5 36 Rd4 Bc6 37 Rxd7 Bxd7 38
h5 Kh7 39 Kg3 Be6 40 Kf4 Bd7 ½-½
Black’s extra pawn is worthless.
Game 23
F.Caruana-Ma.Carlsen
Grenke Classic, Karlsruhe/Baden Baden 2019
It’s White to move. A pawn down against the world champion and with
his bishop hanging, Caruana decided it was time to call it a draw.
Game 24
K.Lagno-V.Ivanchuk
Cap d'Agde (rapid) 2008
A knowledge of book draws will save you a lot of half points, whether you
are the defender trying to escape into a safe haven or the attacker trying to
steer well clear of the reefs.
Game 25
Ma.Carlsen-V.Anand
Grand Chess Tour, Zagreb 2019
After 65 Ng5!, it looks all over for Black as he is too far behind in the
race to queen.
Question: How well do you know your book draws? Can you see a way
for
Anand to slip out of trouble?
Answer: There is no time to take the knight. Before White can start
checking with his new queen Black has to get his pawn to a2 to set up the
draw:
65 ... a3! 66 Nxh7 Kb1 67 f8Q a2
A queen and a knight down against the world champion – it’s time to call
it a draw.
68 Qf5+ Kb2 69 Qe5+ Kb1 70 Qe4+ Kb2 71 Qe2+ Kb1
72 Nf6
Of course Carlsen knows his book draws and so lets Black queen with no
more ado.
The basic drawing mechanism is seen if White arranges Qb3+ and Black
replies ... Ka1 to keep the a2-pawn guarded. This would seem the chance for
White to bring forward his king (or in this case king or knight) as the black
king is stuck in front of the pawn, stopping it from queening. And indeed that
would be the winning plan if Black had a b-pawn or a centre pawn rather than
the a-pawn. He would check the king in front of the pawn, move the king a
square closer, then begin a sequence of checks to force the king in front of
the pawn a second time, move the king a square closer, and so on. A
laborious process but one that works like clockwork.
But because it’s an a-pawn the king is stalemated when in front unless the
white queen gives him a breathing space. But that means White has no time
to bring forward his king (or in this case king or knight) to help mate the
black king. Indeed, if 72 Qb5+ here, Black could already reply 72 ... Ka1 and
White can make no progress: he must move his queen to free the black king
rather than bring up his reserve pieces to mate. If you remove the white
knight and put the black pawn on c2, it would also be a draw. White can
arrange Qb3+ and wins after ... Kc1 by bringing his king up a square as in the
process described above. But Black can again answer Qb3+ with ... Ka1!,
when the pawn threatens to queen, and Qxc2 is stalemate. In other words, the
king can’t be forced in front of the pawn.
Remember, in the battle of queen versus pawn on the seventh rank
supported by the king, it’s a draw with an a-pawn or c-pawn, and a win with
a b-pawn or centre pawn, as there are no stalemate tricks – and if the action is
on the kingside, it’s a draw with f-pawn or h-pawn, win with centre pawn or
g-pawn.
72 ... a1Q 73 Nd5
I remember in my youth watching a tournament on TV where Spassky
beat Karpov with queen and knight against queen, but that was because it was
a sudden death blitz finish and Karpov had less than a minute. IM Bill
Hartston recalls that before the tournament began they decided on a list of
positions from which it wouldn’t be permitted to win on time against your
opponent. Most of the players wanted to include queen and knight versus
queen, but Karpov said “no”! Evidently he thought he’d be the player with
the knight. Though Spassky did actually win the position on the board.
The final moves were: 82 Qa8+ Kc7 83 Qa7+, when Black can hold by
putting the king on d6, but chose 83 ... Kd8?? and resigned after 84 Qb8+ as
84 ... Kd7 85 Nc5+ wins the queen.
Carlsen decides that, in these days of increment, Anand isn’t going to
make a one-move blunder and so sets up a jokey finish. (Should you as a rule
play on in this endgame in your games? I’d give it a go for some moves. Do
your opponents play better than Karpov does when he has a minute on his
clock?)
73 ... Qg7+ 74 Kd6 Qf8+ 75 Ke5 Qe8+
Shock horror! World champion loses his queen to a skewer! (But all ends
well.)
76 Kd4 Qxe2 77 Nc3+ Ka1 78 Nxe2 ½-½
I’ll mention another book draw well worth knowing: say White has Kb1, Pc2,
Rd3 and Black has Kc4 and Qa4. It’s a draw if White swivels his rook from
d3 to b3 and back again, keeping it defended by the pawn. The black king has
no way to break through the barrier on the third rank to help the queen win
the c2-pawn or mate. White’s set-up is called a fortress.
I saw the Russian grandmaster Kupreichik trick his opponent into this
endgame in a simul he gave around about the time he won Hastings in 1982. I
was sitting next to the player who fell into it. He’d had a completely winning
position but, due to a lack of knowledge of book draws, allowed the fortress
and so lost the chance to beat one of the best players in the world. It was
rather pitiful watching him try to ‘reinvent’ endgame theory for about 30
moves before giving it up as a draw.
I probably don’t need to remind you that bishop and ‘wrong’ h-pawn or a-
pawn is only a draw with the defending king in front of the pawn. For
example, white Kg5, Bd3, Ph6 versus black Kh8 is only a draw as the black
king can never be ousted from h8, only stalemated. To win in this scenario
White needs to have a bishop that controls the queening square.
Slightly less well known is the endgame with white Kg4, Ng5, Ph6 versus
black Kh8. It is only a draw if White rushes with 1 h7?. Patience please! You
have to advance the king to g6, put the knight on f7 to check the king from
the corner, and then queen the pawn with h6-h7+ etc.
Besides exchanging off to a book draw, full grovel mode can also involve the
use of a fortress. It can be a laborious defence, but taking punishment has
always been part of the chess experience!
Game 26
V.Anand-H.Nakamura
London Chess Classic 2010
It is Black to play. Nakamura looks in bad shape as he is a pawn down.
But like all great players he is strong in technical endgames and formulated a
plan to rescue himself:
Step one: Exchange rooks off.
Step two: Bring the king to f5 to block the advance of the f3-pawn and
keep the white king out – in other words, create a fortress.
Step three: Prevent White opening lines or creating a target on the
queenside to break the fortress.
Let’s see how he implemented his defence.
30 ... Rh1+! 31 Ke2 Rxd1 32 Kxd1
In principle it is a good idea to avoid exchanging off your last rook when
you are material down. Its long-range power and ability to switch its attack
between wings make it an ideal weapon to harass the opponent’s king and
pawns. Here, however, Nakamura wants to create an impenetrable barrier on
the kingside and doesn’t want the white rook interfering.
32 ... Kd7
Now the black king hurries towards f5. He needs to get there before
White’s king can reach e4, as then the fortress fails after the pawn advance
f4-f5, in conjunction with moves like Bf4 or even an invasion with Kd5 at
some point.
33 Bg5!
Anand sees his king will be outrun in the centre or on the kingside.
Therefore he focuses on trying to open a third path of entry on the queenside.
We’ll see at move 35 how the bishop can menace Black’s queenside if he
isn’t vigilant.
33 ... Ke6 34 a4 c6
Planning 35 ... a6 and 36 ... b5 to create an impenetrable barrier on the
queenside. Anand pre-empts this with his next move.
35 a5!
Question: What is the best responsive to this aggressive stab at our
queenside?
A far safer square than a7 as it escapes the attention of the enemy bishop.
39 Kd3
Frustrated on the queenside, the white king shrugs his shoulders and
heads off on a long journey to the other wing. There is no need for White to
hurry in such positions; indeed, why not extend the opponent’s thankless
defence? A tough player like Nakamura is unlikely to crack under the strain,
but can you vouch for the fortitude of your own opponents?
39 ... Be7 40 Ke2 Bf8 41 Kf1 Be7 42 Kg2 Bd6 43 Kh3 Be7 44 Kg3 Bf6!
Here 44 ... Bd6+ 45 Kh4 Be7+ 46 Kh5 Bf8 looks a sound defence as the
white king is prevented from edging up the h-file. But I like the message that
giving up a second pawn sends to Anand. It reminds me of some advice that
David Bronstein, who drew a world championship match in 1951, gave me
when he came to England for a few years, later in his life: If you stand
slightly worse in a boring endgame, and your opponent is dragging the game
on, don’t just play the natural moves.
He showed me one of his games where he was a bit worse in a rook and
pawn endgame. His opponent captured a pawn, and rather than recapture with
a piece and keep an intact pawn structure, Bronstein retook with a pawn,
giving himself doubled pawns. Objectively, the pawn recapture was no better
or worse than the piece recapture, but the point is that he was showing his
opponent he wasn’t asleep. The opponent gave him a draw shortly
afterwards.
Here Nakamura is saying to Anand that he is totally confident he will
hold the position. He doesn’t even bother to hold onto the c5-pawn.
45 Bxc5 Bd8 46 Be3 Be7 47 Kg2 Bd8
Game 27
A.Ledger-A.Kosten
British League 2001
36 Bxd7!
Exchanging minor pieces removes Black’s only source of counterplay
and clears the way to pin down his remaining pieces to the defence of the a6-
and d6-pawns.
36 ... Rxd7 37 Rea4
Now one black rook must stay on a8, while the other can only stagger
along a couple of squares on the second rank. Spoiler alert! White will resign
after another six moves because he can’t stop his king being mated by these
useless rooks.
37 ... Kd8
Black can only wait until ... well, he mates the white king.
38 Kf3!
Having paralysed the black pieces on the queenside, it is now time to
create a second front on the kingside. This will be done by threatening to
infiltrate with the king via f5 and g6.
38 ... Ke7 39 Ke4 Rb7 40 Kf5
Good enough, but the immediate 40 Ra1 followed by 41 Kf5 was more
thematic.
40 ... Rd7
Here 40 ... Rf8+ 41 Kg6 Rg8+ 42 Kxh6 wins for White as 42 ... Kf6,
threatening mate on h8, can be answered by 43 Rxd6+, driving the black king
away. Note that after the game move White no longer has a defence with
Rxd6+ to a threatened mate on h8, as d6 is defended by the black rook. This
fact becomes of decisive importance in a couple of moves.
41 Kg6
Answer: White is playing with fire to say the least. In the scenario of the
previous note, 43 Rxd6+ drove the black king away at a critical point to stop
mate and so win the game. As this method is no longer available, White
needed to prepare a second way to force the black king back. The way to do it
was with 41 Ra1!. For example: 41 ... Kf7 42 g4 (putting Black in zugzwang
so his king must give way) 42 ... Ke7 (42 ... Kg7 43 Ke6 wins the d6-pawn)
43 Kg6, when if 43 ... Rg8+ 44 Kxh6 Kf6, White stops the mate on h8 with
45 Rf1+! and wins easily after 45 ... Ke7 46 Rf5 Ke8 47 Rf6! etc.
41 ... Rg8+
42 Kh7??
Question: Can you work out why this move is graced with two question
marks?
Not 42 Kxh6?? Kf6 and the threat of mate on h8 wins, as there is no Rf1+
to save White. But it wasn’t too late to retrace his steps with 42 Kf5! and
then, after 42 ... Ra8, play 43 Ra1 followed by a second – and this time 100%
sound – infiltration with 44 Kf5 and 45 Kg6. But how difficult it is to change
your mind and admit you’ve done something wrong.
Answer: 42 ... Kf8+!
I guess White missed the strength of this king retreat. It defends one rook
and prepares a mating net by defending the other rook after his next move.
43 Kxh6 Rdg7! 0-1
Every other move for Black still loses, but this wins as mate follows on
h8.
A horrible swindle, but Tony Kosten didn’t give up hope and remained alert
for the one chance of saving himself. These sort of snap mates are not
unknown in double rook endgames.
Chapter Four
Punishing Faulty Freeing Moves
The aim of a lot of opening systems with Black is to free your position by
preparing a liberating pawn advance. In Chapter Ten we’ll use two games to
illustrate a freeing move in the Caro-Kann. Here we’ll focus on the downside
of such moves when incorrectly implemented.
In books and videos you’ll often see a player lauded for striking at the
white centre with a pawn move such as ... c5! or ... e5!. This can lead to the
false belief that any pawn move which doesn’t lose material and increases the
scope of your pieces must automatically be a good thing.
I recently heard an excellent piece of advice from my club-mate IM
Adam Taylor: When you advance a pawn, think about the squares and lines
that you are leaving behind.
Are we opening lines to the benefit of our pieces, or to the benefit of the
opponent’s pieces?
This chapter is a warning to be on your guard against making ‘false’
freeing moves. More positively, it shows you how to exploit this very
common strategic mistake. You’ll win a lot of games if you play in a steady
fashion, keeping your pieces in good order, and “wait for the opponent to get
an idea”.
Game 28
T.Banusz-L.Vajda
Szentgotthard 2010
It’s Black to play. Vajda decided that he had restrained the e4-pawn enough:
it was time to eliminate it and open lines for his pieces. However, this proved
to be very careless.
27 ... f5?
Answer: 28 e5!
The pawn shoots forward with what Nimzowitsch called “an urge to
expand”. It turns out that the methods of restraint have been insufficient.
28 ... Rxe5
Black’s queenside structure crumbles after 28 ... dxe5 29 d6 cxd6 30
Nxd6 Rd8 31 Rxb6. The knight which looked invincible on c5 has lost all its
support. The black pieces are in such a tangle that 31 ... Nd7 32 Rc6 would
leave the bishop attacked with nowhere safe to go.
29 Rxe5 Rxe5 30 Nxc7 f4
My computer claims that Black is still okay after 30 ... Qe7! 31 Ne6 Re1+
32 Kh2 Bxe6 33 dxe6 Qxe6 34 Rxb6 Qe2!, though I think most humans
would be worried about the open lines around the black king and/or the
passed white a-pawn. Still, this line is much better than the game move which
gives up a pawn just to come out fast with the bishop.
31 Rxf4 Bf5 32 Qd2 Qh6 33 Ne6! Nd3?
Losing in abrupt style, though after 33 ... Bxe6 34 dxe6 Nxe6 35 Bd5
Black’s position is falling apart anyway.
Returning to move 27, Black needed to add one more piece to the battle
for the e5-square with 27 ... Qg7!.
Then he is ready to advance 28 ... f5, the vital difference compared with
27 ... f5? being that his queen is defending the c7-square ‘through’ the rook
on e7. This means that if White played in the style of the game with 29 e5
Rxe5 30 Rxe5 Rxe5, he wouldn’t have the option of 31 Nxc7.
It might seem strange to describe 27 ... Qg7 as fighting for control of the
e5-square when the main value of the move is to guard c7 in the key variation
above. But maybe this is consistent with Nimzowitsch’s observation that
strategically important points should be overprotected, as the pieces doing so
will “automatically” find themselves well placed for other tasks. That is, the
queen goes to g7 to overprotect the e5-square, and finds itself well placed to
defend the pawn on c7.
Of course after 27 ... Qg7 it would be White to move and he doesn’t have
to let Black get in 28 ... f5 ‘for free’. An interesting response would be 28
Qc3!?, offering the exchange of queens to remove the potential defender of
c7 and so once again deter 28 ... f5. Nevertheless, after 28 ... Ba6 (not rushing
to force matters) Black retains some edge as the white pieces have an
essentially defensive role in guarding the e4-pawn.
Sometimes it’s vital to keep lines blocked. You have to be cruel to be kind to
your pieces. Is it worth opening the cage door to let your pet hamster stretch
its legs, if a hawk is going to swoop down and carry it off?
Game 29
G.Serper-J.Becerra Rivero
Ledyard 2000
Answer: 13 g4!
In contrast to Black’s pseudo-freeing move 9 ... f5 this pawn stab is the
real deal. If Black plays 13 ... f4 to block the g-file, then White’s knight on c3
gets the e4-square and his queen and light-squared bishop can take possession
of the b1-h7 diagonal.
13 ... Qd7
Getting out of the pin on f6, but this awkward move shows the complete
failure of Black’s plan.
14 Rg1!
Instead, 14 gxf5 was the obvious move. It would be very strong, but
Serper has seen that the rook on g1 plus the mobile g-pawn is a more potent
mix than just having the rook on an open file.
14 ... f4
We already know the drawbacks to this move, but Black can’t allow
g4xf5 to remain forever hanging over his head.
15 Bxf6!
Clearing the way for the g-pawn and winning the e4-square for the
knight.
15 ... Bxf6 16 g5 Bg7 17 Bg4!?
A very thematic move. Serper plans to eliminate the light-squared bishop
on c8 so that his queen and knight will be virtually unassailable once they
take up posts on the b1-h7 diagonal.
In fact, White’s attack was already so strong that there wasn’t the need for
positional niceties. Here is an interesting variation: 17 Bd3! Kh8 18 Bxh7!
(no check, no fuss: just stealing a vital pawn) 18 ... Kxh7 (not forced, but
with the loss of h7 it’s hopeless anyway) 19 Nf6+ Bxf6 20 Qh5+ Kg7 21
gxf6+ Kxf6 22 Ne4+ Ke7 23 Rg7+ Kd8 24 Qg5+ Ke8 25 Nf6+ Rxf6 26 Qxf6
and with mate on g8 and the black queen hanging this is where the proverbial
boxing match would be stopped.
17 ... Qd8 18 Ne4
The white knight has reached its dream square.
Question: But can you see an even better post for it?
25 g7+
More than good enough.
Answer: But ‘blundering’ a rook with 25 gxh7!! was the fastest and
prettiest way to conclude the game: 25 ... Rxg1+ 26 Kd2 Rxb1 (26 ... Kf7 27
Qxg1 quickly decides though is much less fun) 27 h8Q+ Ke7 28 Qg7+ Kd8
(or 28 ... Ke8 29 Nf6+ Kd8 30 Qf8 mate) 29 Qf8+ Kd7 30 Nf6 mate.
25 ... Ke7 26 Qxh7 Qh3 27 0-0-0
It’s surprising the game lasts until move 42 as White has a gigantic
passed pawn and a ready target in the black king.
27 ... Nc5 28 Qg6 a4 29 Qf6+ Ke8 30 Nxf4
One more humiliation for Black, as 30 ... exf4 31 Rde1+ Kd7 32 Re7+
Kd8 33 Qf8+ would be brutal.
30 ... Qf3 31 Qg6+ Ke7 32 Qg5+ Kd7 33 Qf5+ Ke8 34 Qh5+ Qxh5 35
Nxh5 Kf7 36 Rg4 a3 37 b3 e4 38 Kc2 Rae8 39 Rf4+ Kg6 40 Nf6 Nd3 41
Rg1+ Kf7 42 Nxg8+ Kxg8 1-0
Black has finally had enough. The simplest way to win is 43 Rf6, 44 Rh6
and 45 Rh8+.
Game 30
L.Winants-N.Eliet
Belgian League 2014
In the diagram position the pawns on e6 and f7 present a brick wall to the
bishop on b3. But Black became afraid of the other bishop and so decided to
block it with:
15 ... e5?
After this the brick wall becomes a paper sheet held together with sticky
plaster.
Question: Find the best way for Black to deal with the bishop on c3.
Answer: The correct way to neutralize the c3-bishop was by 15 ... Nf6!.
Some structural damage to the kingside can be tolerated if the centre is rock
solid; i.e. 16 Bxf6 gxf6 17 Qd4 (after, say, 17 Qg4+ Kh8 18 Qh4 Qe5 19 Bc2
f5, I’m starting to prefer Black) 17 ... Qe5! with equality.
16 Qh5 Be4 17 Rfd1
Black’s centre is creaking under the onslaught from the white bishops,
queen and rook. Note the contribution that the ‘quiet’ bishop on b3 is making
by pinning the pawn on f7 and so stopping the bolstering of e5 with ... f7-f6.
17 ... Bg6?
Instead, 17 ... Rae8 guarding e5 was necessary, though White can start
another wave of his attack with 18 f4! and is going at least to win the pawn
on e5 in a few moves, as 18 ... exf4 19 Qg4 (attacking d7 and g7) 19 ... Ne5
20 Qxf4 Ba8 21 b5! leaves Black tied up. He has no good way to stop 22 Bb4
winning the exchange, as the rook on e8 has to stay guarding e5, and if 21 ...
Kh8 then 22 Bb4 Rg8 23 Bd6 Qb7 24 Bd5 (stopping mate on g2) would win
the knight.
Game 31
T.Radjabov-S.Vidit
Wijk aan Zee 2019
12 ... h6
Guarding the g5-square.
Question: Is it tactically safe for Black to play 12 ... e5 to free his game?
Answer: We see the awesome strength of the advanced pawn after 19 ...
g6 20 Rxg6+! fxg6 21 Qxg6+ Kf8 (otherwise mate in one thanks to the
pawn) 22 Ng5 Qe7 (to guard f7 and e6) 23 h7! Rxe3+ 24 Kf1! (why even
think about taking the rook, although that wins as well) 24 ... Qg7 25 h8Q+!
(what a great career for the pawn!) 25 ... Qxh8 26 Qf7 mate.
20 Bxg7 Nxg7 21 Rxg7+ Kf8 22 Qh7 Qf6
The black queen finally gets to the f6-square. It is too late, but this
doesn’t stop Vidit putting up a stout resistance.
23 Ng5
Threatening 24 Rxf7+ as well as the black rook.
23 ... Rxe3+!? 24 Kf1!
After 24 fxe3? Bg3+ Black has enough for perpetual.
24 ... Nd8 25 Qg8+ Ke7 26 h7 Bg3
Black’s counterattack looks like it might triumph after all, but now comes
a killer move.
27 Ne4!
Protecting f2 and gaining time to eliminate Black’s dangerous bishop by
attacking his queen.
27 ... Rxe4 28 Rxg3 Rh4 29 Rd1!
Cutting off the escape of the black king towards the queenside. As the h-
pawn has to be dealt with, there is no good way to prevent White picking up
the rook on a8 with his next move.
29 ... Rxh7 30 Re3+ Ne6 31 Qxa8
Threatening mate on d8.
31 ... Rh8 32 Qc6 Kf8
Allowing a neat winning combination to round off an excellent fighting
game by both players, but in any case 32 ... Rd8 to guard the d-file is
hopeless after 33 Qxc7+.
Question: Can you see how to finish in style?
The following game shows the importance of the time factor in the battle
between a pawn structure’s urge to expand and the effort to restrain it. It
takes one move for the assessment to go from ‘fine for Black’ to ‘Black is
struggling’. And that move won’t be a tactical blunder or a spectacular
positional misconception. It will be a dull, unimaginative move which
squanders a tempo and gives White the chance to get an iron grip on the
centre.
Game 32
M.Vachier Lagrave-A.Tari
Gibraltar 2019
White has chosen a slow, careful opening. He hasn’t tried to stop his
opponent developing his pieces, castling his king into safety, or establishing
himself in the centre. One advantage of playing in this style is that you avoid
a heavyweight theoretical battle. The position isn’t going to burn out rapidly,
as can be the case when the two sides meet in a violent, but essentially pre-
planned opening struggle.
White’s opening might not be forceful, but it will preserve every piece
and pawn on the board until move 14. The position is therefore strategically
complex, if not tactically complex. Playing an outstanding but young
opponent, perhaps Vachier-Lagrave wanted to put the emphasis on quiet
positional manoeuvring ‘behind the lines’.
We might sum up the position in a simple sentence: If Black manages to
advance ... d6-d5 in a safe way he will have solved all his problems. But as
we shall see, it is not so easy for him to work out when and how to achieve
this aim – or indeed for White to work out how best to restrain it.
10 Ne4?!
I’m here to praise MVL not bury him, as he handles the positional attack
superbly later on in the game. But it must be pointed out that at this stage the
omens aren’t good.
Answer: White puts the knight on a pleasant centre post, seeing that
Black can’t evict it with ... f7-f5 as his bishop is in the way. However, it
amounts to neglect of the key d5-square. It’s true that Black isn’t ready to
play ... d6-d5 yet as c5 would hang, but this can easily be remedied.
Instead, White should prefer 10 d3. For example: 10 ... Qd7 11 Nd5 Bh3
12 Bxh3 Qxh3 13 Nec3, consolidating his hold on the d5-square. If then 13 ...
f5 White has 14 f4 – the black queen isn’t going to mate White on its own. In
this sequence Black could try 11 ... Nxd5 12 cxd5 Ne7, when White no
longer has the d5-square for his knight, but he now has a superior wedge of
pawns in the centre. After 13 e4 Bh3 14 Qd2, White went onto win with a
well-timed f2-f4 in R.Keene-J.Penrose, England 1974.
10 ... Qd7 11 f4
At last a direct challenge to the black pawn structure. Nevertheless, it is
too much of a liberty when White hasn’t taken measures against ... d6-d5. He
should still prefer 11 d3 Rad8 12 N2c3 etc, though Black is more comfortable
after 12 ... Bh3 than in the scenario of the previous note.
11 ... Rad8 12 d3
Black would be well placed after 12 fxe5 dxe5 13 N2c3 (not 13 Nxc5?
Qxd2) 13 ... b6 etc.
12 ... b6
Now there is a massive positional threat of 13 ... d5!, overrunning the key
d5-square. It would ruin White’s build-up: after 14 cxd5 Nxd5 the e3-pawn
hangs, the d3-pawn is left backward on an open file, and the black knight
(which has hitherto been a poor piece on e7) springs to life.
Therefore restraint is necessary.
13 N2c3
13 ... h6?
Black’s plan is to go ... Be6 and ... d6-d5 to achieve a good game without
being bothered by Ng5. Alas for him, this well-meaning but languid pawn
move gives White just the tempo he needs to impose his will on the position.
This is actually the critical moment in the game. Despite the slow
opening, time has become of massive value. Black needed to act at once with
13 ... Be6!, planning ... d6-d5. After 14 Ng5 (or 14 Qe2 d5, though it would
be better for White to submit to this) 14 ... d5 15 Nxe6 fxe6, a position arises
which at first glance might appear good for White due to his two bishops. In
fact his control of the dark squares d4 and e3 is decidedly shaky. Black’s
pieces are well centralized and can support moves like ... d5-d4 and ... Nf5 (a
superb post for the knight) to exploit this weakness.
The conclusion is that Black had no need for 12 ... h6. And it costs him
the game.
Answer: 14 Nd5!
Stopping d5 once and for all and threatening a fork on f6. Black has fallen
into a bind, after which White’s 2780 technique takes over. The rest of the
game is a positional pummelling.
14 ... Nxd5
After 14 ... f6 15 Nec3 White has a firm grip on d5. If then 15 ... Nxd5 he
would reply 16 Nxd5 as, everything else being equal, he wants a piece rather
than a pawn on d5.
15 cxd5 Ne7
Black might have hoped that things aren’t too bad, as White has been
obliged to fill the d5-hole with a pawn, rather than occupy or control it with a
piece. If so, Tari underestimated the speed with which White is able to build a
dynamic centre after his next move.
16 Nf2!
MVL makes some sublime knight moves in this game to atone for the
‘sin’ of 10 Ne4. The knight retreat guards d5, stops ... Bh3, and threatens to
win a piece with 17 e4 or 17 g4. What more could you ask?
16 ... Qc8
After 16 ... exf4 17 Bxg7 Kxg7 18 e4 the black bishop is trapped.
17 e4 Bd7
White has a space advantage and a solid centre. A couple of moves ago
he had less space and a loose structure. On the other side Black’s knight is a
poor piece with no squares, and he no longer has the freeing move ... d6-d5 or
the chance to ease his game by exchanging bishops with ... Bh3. In fact he is
deprived of any activity. White could already create a protected passed pawn
in the centre with 18 fxe5 dxe5, but MVL prefers to build up gradually.
18 Qd2 f5 19 Rae1 Qc7
Answer: 20 Nd1!
An awesome regrouping. The knight wasn’t doing much on f2 (it was
denied the d3, e4 and g4 squares) so it heads to e3 with ideas of Nc4 to add to
the pressure on the black centre.
20 ... Rf7 21 Ne3 exf4
If instead 21 ... b5 then the c5-pawn will become a target to Rc1 after an
exchange of pawns on e5. White’s central pawn majority is working hard,
whereas Black’s 3-2 majority on the left of the board does nothing.
22 gxf4 Bxb2 23 Qxb2 fxe4 24 dxe4 Rdf8 25 e5!
MVL had to calculate that his 28th move would be decisive before
entering this line. The central breakthrough comes just in time before Black
can take the f4-pawn ‘for free’.
25 ... Rxf4
The way to fight on was 25 ... Bb5! 26 Nc4 Nf5, although this allows
White an advanced protected passed pawn with 27 e6!?.
26 Rxf4 Rxf4 27 exd6 Qxd6 28 Nc4
Winning the exchange in view of the loose black knight.
28 ... Rxc4 29 bxc4 Nf5 30 Bh3!
Forcing exchanges is the simplest way to clinch the point. 30 ... Nd4 31
Bxd7 Nf3+ (or 31 ... Qxd7 32 Qf2) 32 Kh1 Nxe1 would be hopeless for
Black, in view of 33 Be6+ Kh7 34 Qf6 Qc7 35 Bf7, threatening mate in two.
30 ... Qf4 31 Qf6 Qd4+
Things have gone terribly wrong when you feel obliged to swap queens
while the exchange down.
32 Qxd4 cxd4 33 Kf2 Kf7 34 Ke2 Ke7 35 Kd3+ Kd6 36 Bxf5 1-0
An impressive middlegame by MVL after an inauspicious start.
Chapter Five
Exploiting a Hole
Sometimes our plan will consist of trying to gain control of a square near the
opponent’s defensive line or at some other point of strategic value.
The normal target is a square in the centre which can’t be defended by an
enemy pawn – a so-called hole. If we are successful, it can be used by one of
our pieces as an outpost. Having a piece in a commanding position will
facilitate an attack on the king or one of the operations against pieces or
pawns outlined in the previous chapters. Naturally, a strong opponent won’t
gladly submit to our domination of such a key square. He will try his best to
overrun it with a ‘freeing’ pawn advance or obstruct our plan in some other
way.
Game 33
L.D.Nisipeanu-T.Radjabov
Medias 2010
13 g3
Black is fine after 13 Ncxb4 Nxb4 14 Nxb4 Qb6 15 Nd5 (or 15 Nd3 Qd4,
when he regains his pawn) 15 ... Qxb2 etc.
13 ... Be6 14 Bg2 a5 15 0-0 Rc8 16 Qd3
White unable to bring his knight into contact with d5 by 16 Ne3 without
allowing 16 ... Nd4.
16 ... g6
Instead, 16 ... Bxd5 17 cxd5 (after 17 Qxd5 Nd4 18 Nxd4 exd4 the white
queen is awkwardly placed) and now 17 ... Nd4 18 Nxd4 exd4 is probably
okay for Black if you can overcome your instinctive horror of the doubled
pawns, but the plan of rerouting the knight to the excellent c5 post via d7
after 17 ... Nb8 is attractive.
17 Nxf6+!
Nisipeanu says he thought a long time before giving up his ‘good’ knight
for the ‘bad’ bishop. Evidently he couldn’t see any advantage for White if he
allowed 17 ... Bg7.
17 ... Qxf6 18 b3 Qe7 19 Rad1 Rfd8
There is an impasse on the d-file, with the d6-pawn solidly defended.
Therefore Nisipeanu decides to fight for the key d5-square by playing a move
on the edge of the board:
20 h4
“Your eye on the wings, your mind on the centre, that is the deepest
meaning of positional play” – Nimzowitsch (quoted on page six of my Giants
of Strategy book).
The plan is to exchange White’s passive bishop on g2 for its counterpart
on e6 which is guarding the d5-square. This will be arranged by 21 Kh2 and
22 Bh3. If Black exchanges himself with 22 ... Bxh3 23 Kxh3 then White
gets control of d5; subsequently White can use the h-pawn to undermine the
black kingside with h4-h5. If Black leaves White to exchange bishops with
23 Bxe6 fxe6, then Black has a pawn guarding d5 but can no longer
counterattack against e4 with ... f7-f5; and White can again continue with
moves like Kg2, Rh1 and h4-h5 to attack on the kingside, which has been
weakened by the recapture ... f7xe6.
20 ... Kh8?!
Black could prepare a wing thrust of his own with 20 ... Ra8 and then 21
... a4. Chances would remain equal. Radjabov, who is a dynamic player at
heart despite his drawing propensities, wants instead to take the bull by the
horns on the kingside. He therefore tucks his king in the corner before lashing
out with his next move.
21 Kh2 f5?
Black won’t be able to adequately support the large centre he creates with
this move. He could still revert to the plan of 21 ... Ra8 and 22 ... a4, but it
would have been psychologically difficult. There’s a handy proverb, often
quoted by Russian chess authors: once you’ve said “A” you have to say “B”.
Having played 20 ... Kh8, it was just too tempting to follow up with 21 ... f5?.
22 exf5 gxf5
Notice that as soon as Black plays 21 ... f5 White ditches the plan of Bh3,
despite spending two moves preparing it. It is no longer relevant. Indeed,
after 23 Bh3? Black could break out from the bind with 23 ... d5! (23 ... f4 is
not bad either) 24 cxd5 (24 Bxf5? loses a piece to 24 ... e4) 24 ... Rxd5 with a
good game.
Many plans never see the light of day on the board, even if their
implementation and prevention have played a major part in the thoughts of
the players during a game.
23 Bxc6!
A great decision. It involves rising above years and years of stereotyped
thinking, which tells you that the fianchettoed bishop is a vital piece and
shouldn’t be exchanged for a knight. I believe the difficulty is in noticing
such a move is possible. It wouldn’t occur to most players, in the same way
that they wouldn’t examine a move that leaves a piece en prise, unless there
were some factors to prompt them, like an exposed king whose defences can
be removed with a knight sac. Once you’ve looked at 23 Bxc6 seriously for
even twenty seconds, you should begin to warm to it. The bulky black centre
loses a staunch defender and cannot be held together for long after White’s
next move.
If 23 f4 at once then after 23 ... e4 it is not only miserable for the white
bishop to have been shut in, it’s bad news for the whole of White’s strategy:
without its influence over d5 Black can break out after, say, 24 Qe3 d5.
23 ... Rxc6
Answer: 24 f4!
This cannot be delayed, as 24 Ne3 f4! 25 Nd5 Qg7 26 Qe4 Rg8 gives
Black exactly the type of attacking scheme he was hoping for when he played
20 ... Kh8.
Instead, the advance of the black f-pawn has now been blocked, so it
can’t be used as an attacking lever against White’s kingside. The c8-h3
diagonal remains closed, keeping the black bishop shut in. There is already
the threat of 25 fxe5, winning a pawn (we’re happy about giving up the
blockade on f4 if it destroys the black centre). And if Black replies 24 ... e4,
then 25 Qd4+ Kg8 (25 ... Qg7 loses the exchange after 26 Qxg7+ Kxg7 27
Nd4) 26 Ne3 leaves the black structure congealed.
Question: How do you assess this analysis position? What is White’s best
plan?
A beautiful move. The knight pounces on the ghost of the pawn on d6. If
now 30 ... Rxd6, then 31 Qxe5+ and 32 Qxd6 wins.
30 ... Red8
After 30 ... Rg8 it’s not too late for White to lose with the catastrophic 31
fxe5??, when 31 ... f4 32 gxf4 Qg1 sees him mated, while after 32 Qxf4
Qh3+ 33 Kg1 Rxg3+ 34 Rg2 Rdg7 35 Qf8+ Bg8 Black has a decisive attack.
Instead, 31 Qxe5+ Rgg7 32 Rg2 would win easily for White.
Notice how Black has struggled throughout due to the inferiority of his
bishop. And that was all thanks to the blocking move 24 f4. If this barrier is
released even for a move, the bishop springs to life.
31 Qxe5+ Qg7 32 c5!
Completing his domination of the central dark squares: c5, d6 and e5 are
all in his hands. Now White will be a pawn up in the endgame with a
dominating knight.
32 ... Qxe5 33 fxe5 Rc7 34 Rc2 d4 35 Rfd2 f4
Black finally frees his bishop, but it is a despairing combination which is
easily refuted.
36 gxf4 d3 37 Rxd3 Bf5
Question: Have a look at the centre. What factors favour White, and how
should he manoeuvre his pieces to utilize the c4-square, assuming Black
plays ... Be6 on the next move?
Answer: White has a hole on d3 and Black on d6, but otherwise three
factors favour White in the central pawn structure:
1) White has the d4-square covered, whereas the black pawns can’t guard
the d5-square. Therefore d5 is an outpost for White (and another hole for
Black).
2) The c5-pawn slightly impedes the action of Black’s dark-squared
bishop.
3) The c5-pawn can also be targeted by Be3. If Black defends it with ...
b7-b6, the supporting pawn could be rammed in the future with a4-a5,
opening the a-file for the white rook and making the b6-pawn more shaky.
The first step in White’s plan is to manoeuvre his knight to c4, where it
attacks the pawn on e5, eyes the hole on d6, and can be redeployed, if
desired, to the outpost square on d5 via e3.
11 Nd2 Be6
Not giving up the c4-square without a fight.
12 Be2!
An important move. The bishop switches defensive duty on f3 for support
of the knight on c4.
12 ... Bc7
Guarding the e5-pawn in anticipation of White’s next move.
13 f3
Necessary, as e4 would hang if the knight moves from d2. Notice how it
is more economical for White to have a pawn guarding e4 than it is for Black
to have a bishop defending e5.
13 ... Ke7
The king stays in the centre to lend a hand guarding some squares. It
clears the way for the rook on h8 to go to the d-file and, as we shall see, the
knight to go to e8.
14 a4!
An important move. White wants his knight to be safe from attack by ...
b7-b5 when it sits on c4. As stated above, White might further advance a4-a5,
if appropriate, once he has provoked ... b7-b6.
14 ... h5
A precaution against White gaining space with g2-g4 on the kingside,
when he might go g4-g5 to drive away the knight that is protecting the hole
on d5.
15 h4
Given the chance Black might have gained space himself on the kingside
with 15 ... h4, intending ... Nh5 and ... Nf4. Notice in this sequence that the
f4-square becomes in effect an outpost square for the black knight, as
evicting it with g2-g3 would be very problematic. It’s better for White to nip
the plan in the bud with the game move which fixes the kingside, when he
can focus on his own plan in the centre and on the queenside.
15 ... Rhd8
Black’s rook goes to the open file, but there isn’t anything aggressive for
it to do there. On the other hand, it further bolsters his defence of the d5-
square, which is useful as Black’s knight intends to relinquish its part in the
role – see his next move.
16 Nc4
Five moves after the knight aimed at c4 it’s finally time to go there.
16 ... Ne8
Preparing to challenge the white knight with ... Nd6. I hope you realize
that the white knight, although a nuisance for Black, is far more tolerable for
him than its removal with 16 ... Bxc4?, which would amount to positional
suicide. After 17 Bxc4 Black would be left horribly weak on the light
squares.
17 Be3
An attack we envisaged back on move ten.
17 ... b6
Necessary, to defend c5. We might say that White has completed the first
stage of his plan: the knight has reached c4, Black’s light squares on the
queenside have been loosened somewhat, and the b6-pawn is a target for a
future a4-a5. On the other hand, Black hasn’t been sleeping either. He has
brought all his pieces into the game and is planning to dislodge the white
knight with ... Nd6.
Question: Therefore White needs a new plan. Can you work out what it
might be? What pawn advances should you make?
Answer: White put the rook on c1 as, according to part #1 of his plan, he
intends at a good moment to advance b2-b4, when the rook will be well
placed after the exchange of pawns on b4. Note that the plan of b2-b4 is all
the more effective because the black knight is nowhere near getting to the
hole on d4 which emerges after the exchange of pawns.
20 ... Nd6
Black decides not to wait for White’s attack.
21 Ne3
At long last the knight sees the ideal square on d5.
21 ... f5
And finally Black has some counterplay. Nonetheless, it feels like
White’s bishop pair are always going to give him some edge when the
position opens up. Play develops according to part #2 of the plan outlined for
White at move 17 above.
22 Nd5+!
Just in time, otherwise White would have had to concede the centre to
Black with 22 exf5 gxf5.
22 ... Bxd5 23 exd5
23 ... c4
Black’s knight is on a blockade square in front of the passed pawn –
compare this to the knight on e3 in the analysis to 24 f4 in Nisipeanu-
Radjabov above.
Instead, after 23 ... Kd7 24 Ba6!? White is ready to attack the e5-pawn
with moves like Re1 and Bg3, as well as keeping the option of advancing b2-
b4. He would be able to probe with his two bishops. Therefore MVL reduces
the scope of White’s light-squared bishop and also rules out b2-b4. The
drawback is that White can prepare b2-b3 as the beginning of a pawn
advance on the queenside: an amendment to his plan of b2-b4 outlined in part
#1.
24 Be3 Kd7 25 Rab1 Rf8 26 b3 f4
When a player makes a hasty bid for activity it is usually a sign either of
too much confidence or the exact opposite: too much fear. It’s unclear
whether Black overestimated his kingside chances or was anxious about
White’s potential queenside pressure. In any case, he should trust in his
kingside activity with 26 ... cxb3 27 Rxb3 e4, though White could play 28
Bd4, planning the pawn advance c4-c5.
27 Bf2 e4
Upon 27 ... cxb3 28 Rxb3 e4 (28 ... Nf5 29 Bd3 leaves Black with a hole
on e4 and a restrained centre) 29 fxe4 Nxe4 30 Bb5+ Kd6 31 Bc6 Nxf2 32
Kxf2 Rab8 33 Re1, we can add up White’s advantages: control of the e-file,
passed pawn, much superior bishop, and the awkward situation of the black
king.
28 fxe4 Rae8 29 bxc4 Nxe4
It looks as if Black is generating counterplay but he must have missed the
strength of White’s next move.
30 c5!
White is able to break through on the key point on the queenside due to
the threat of winning the exchange with 31 Bb5+.
30 ... Nxc3
Now White acquires two passed pawns, but giving up the exchange
against a player like Aronian would have been equally hopeless.
31 Rxc3 Rxe2 32 d6 Bd8 33 c6+! Kc8
The neat point is 33 ... Kxd6 34 c7! Bxc7 35 Rd1+, winning the black
bishop.
34 a5!
Breaking through on the b-file is the simplest way to win.
34 ... Rxf2 35 Kxf2 Rf5 36 c7 Bxh4+ 37 Kf3 Rd5 38 axb6 1-0
Game 35
F.Caruana-S.Karjakin
Stavanger 2018
Black’s doubled f-pawns, with the hole on f5 in front of them, make a ghastly
impression. Caruana already has his rooks lined up against the front pawn,
and his bishop is menacing the f7-pawn.
His dream would be to get his knight to f5, after which the black kingside
would surely collapse. The defence would be hampered not only by its
structural weakness but also by the vulnerability of the king to a mating
attack.
Nonetheless, Karjakin has his whole army, including the rooks, in action
and he is well known to be a doughty defender. And if the white pieces get
too carried away we could imagine the black queen announcing mate on g2
with the help of the ‘hidden’ bishop on b7.
Let’s see how White’s plan unfolded.
22 b4!
If you take home only one idea from reading this book, it should be what
I keep on pointing out to players I coach: Every plan needs the use of pawns
at some point. It is easy to focus on the machinations of the ‘big’ pieces,
especially when there are open lines and diagonals, and forget to use a pawn
either to improve your own position or wear down that of the opponent.
White will advance the pawn to b5 to drive the black knight away and
thus win the d4-square for his own knight.
22 ... axb4 23 axb4
23 ... Re7
Question: Try to work out the best response to 23 ... Nxb4. Think about a
sac with 24 Bxf7+ and the follow-up moves. Can you see an edge after
24 Qb3 instead?
Answer: With the game move Black adds a defender to c7 and f7. His
position collapses after 23 ... Nxb4 24 Bxf7+! Kxf7 25 Qxc7+ Re7 (it looks
as if everything is covered, but now comes the second wave of White’s
attack) 26 Ng5+! (deflecting the black queen from the defence of d6, as 26 ...
Kf8 27 Rxf6+ would be crushing) 26 ... Qxg5 27 Qxd6 Nd5 (again it appears
that Black is just about holding everything together, but now comes the third
wave of the attack in the shape of a double-attack on the black queen and
knight) 28 Rf5! Qg6 29 Rxd5 Bxd5 30 Qxd5+ Kg7 31 Qd6 Rb7 32 Qc6 (the
attacking 32 Rf3! is even stronger) 32 ... Rf7 33 Qxb6 and White is two
pawns up with an easy win.
I sympathize if you are thinking that you could never work out such a
long sequence of moves, especially as it includes some unexpected tactical
points (for example, 26 Ng5+! and 28 Rf5!). It is worth remembering that if
you want to be a strong positional player you still have to be able to calculate
ahead and see tactical nuances. Even if you succeed in winning a purely
strategic battle (and such games are rare) you will often have to finish off the
opponent in a tactical skirmish as he puts up a desperate last stand.
Nevertheless, you can often make things simpler for yourself. Here, for
example, if you are unsure about the piece sacrifice 24 Bxf7+!, you can settle
for 24 Qb3 (attacking b4 and f7) 24 ... Nd5 25 Nd4. You’ve got the knight to
d4 and are threatening a fork on f5. Black should try 25 ... Re5. Now both 26
Qa2 (intending 27 Qa7 in the style of the game) and 26 Qc2! (preparing 27
Nf5) are excellent for White – not as overwhelming as 24 Bxf7+, but good
enough for a clear edge.
In this way you can replace a long, difficult variation with a two- or three-
move calculation, followed by a positional assessment. But remember, there
is no excuse to reject calculation altogether. Notice after 25 ... Re5 in the line
above that 26 Qa2 or 26 Qc2 is recommended, rather than 26 Nf5 which
appears to win the exchange. It does, but after 26 ... Rxf5 27 Rxf5 Nxe3!
White is suddenly lost because of the mate threat on g2 (remember the bishop
on b7!). Whereas 26 Qc2 gives White the option (if allowed) of 27 Nf5 Rxf5
28 Qxf5, as the rook stays on f2 guarding g2.
Keep your eyes open for tactics and practice your calculation – your
chess can’t flourish otherwise.
24 b5 Ne5 25 Nd4
White has completed the first stage of his plan. There is a mega-threat of
26 Nf5, forking all of Black’s major pieces.
25 ... Bc8
The bishop is obliged to retreat and relinquish its pressure on g2, which
means that the white rook on f2 is freed from a defensive role.
Question: What is Black’s threat?
26 Kh1
Answer: Not so fast! Before continuing with his plan White takes a
timeout to meet the threat of 26 ... Bxh3.
The impetuous 26 Nf5? would be a poor choice from a strategic point of
view as White doesn’t want to swap his great knight for the black bishop;
instead, he wants to exchange his own bishop for it (see the comment to the
next move). It would also be a tactical howler as White drops a pawn after 26
... Bxf5 27 Rxf5 Nxc4 28 Qxc4 Rxd2.
26 ... Kg7
Now Caruana has to decide on the next stage of his plan. His attention
focuses on the opposing bishop. He realizes that if he could get his own
bishop to f5 and challenge the black one, one of two scenarios would emerge:
1) The bishops are exchanged, leaving the white knight as absolute
master of the f5-square.
2) The black bishop moves away to b7 to avoid the exchange. Then it will
be short of safe squares and will be a nuisance to defend if targeted by the
white queen via the open a-file.
But how is the white bishop going to get to f5 to carry out its mission?
The answer is: slowly and carefully.
27 Be2
The first step. Instead, 27 Bd3 Rxd4! 28 exd4 Qxd3 would be
embarrassing for White (always keep an eye on the tactics!). However, 27
Ba2 looks a good alternative, especially as 28 Bb1, getting the bishop to the
right diagonal, would come with a threat of 29 Qxh7+. I imagine Caruana
wanted to keep his bishop in contact with the kingside for as long as possible
to deter any possible attack by Black there.
27 ... Kh8 28 Qc3
Now the queen vacates the c2-square for the bishop.
28 ... Kg7 29 Bd1 Kg8
30 Bc2
The bishop finally makes contact with the f5-square.
Question: Would 30 Rxf6 have been simpler?
Game 36
Yu Yangyi-V.Artemiev
Gibraltar 2019
White has a space advantage on the kingside. The fractured black pawn
structure on that wing, in particular the pawn on h6, presents an object of
attack. Black, for his part, has to fortify his kingside and seek counterplay on
the queenside on the open c-file.
Question: Can you see a clever manoeuvre for Black to exploit the hole
on b4?
19 ... Rxc1+!
In view of the previous comment this might seem a strange decision. Why
does Black hand over the c-file? The simple answer is he doesn’t: he leaves it
temporarily under the control of the white rook before seizing it back. As we
shall see, this exchange helps Black’s plan as it allows his knight to utilize
the a2-square.
Answer: If 19 ... Nb4 at once, 20 Rc3! is annoying. Then 20 ... Rxc3? is a
huge positional mistake, strengthening White’s centre after 21 bxc3, while
otherwise Black’s counterplay has been slowed down (i.e. there’s no ... Na2!
move).
20 Rxc1 Nb4 21 g3
Guarding h4 in preparation for his 23rd move.
21 ... Na2! 22 Rd1
Instead, 22 Ra1 Nb4 23 Rc1 would offer a draw by repetition. This was
the financially crucial last round of the Gibraltar Masters and both players
were going for broke.
22 ... Rc8 23 Nh2 Qc7!
The queen adds her power to the attack down the open file. She prepares
to answer 24 Ng4 with 24 ... Qc2!, when the exchange of queens is
unwelcome to White.
Note that 23 ... Rc2? would be a mistake, falling for 24 Nh5+! Bxh5
(after 24 ... Kh8 25 Qxh6 White’s attack is lethal) 25 Qxc2 Bxd1 26 Qxd1
and the forced exchange of Black’s light-squared bishop has left his king
very exposed.
24 Bd3 h5!
The doubled pawn proves its value by stopping the knight going to g4.
25 g4
A forceful reply, which Artemiev meets with a sacrifice.
25 ... Nb4!? 26 Bxg6 hxg6 27 gxh5 Qc2 28 hxg6
Black is left with a commanding rook on the seventh rank after 28 Qxc2
Rxc2 29 hxg6 Bxh4 30 gxf7 Bxf2+ 31 Kh1 Kxf7.
28 ... Qf5!
The point of Black’s plan. He is temporarily two pawns down but his
queen is well placed to nullify White’s attacking chances on the kingside. In
fact, due to his broken pawn structure, it is Yu Yangyi’s king who is in most
danger. Black is sure to get one pawn back, when his dynamic pieces give
him full compensation for the material.
29 Qe3
White hurries his own queen over to g3 to stabilize matters. He didn’t like
29 gxf7 Kxf7, when Black is poised to attack down the open g-file with 30 ...
Rg8+.
29 ... fxg6 30 Qg3 Rf8 31 Ng2 Qc2 32 Ne3?
The first real slip by either player. The knight was doing an important job
on g2: guarding h4, shielding the king, while ready to go to f4 to attack e6
and g6 in some lines. White should settle for 32 Rf1, when 32 ... Nc6 33 Qg4,
protecting d4 and attacking e6, is unclear.
32 ... Qe4
Preparing to target the d4-pawn.
33 Neg4?
Yu Yangyi has had no luck with this knight. The last chance was to
retract his last move with 33 Ng2, when 33 ... Nc6 (33 ... Bd8!?, planning to
attack the d4-pawn with ... Bb6, also looks awkward for White) 34 Qc3
grimly defends the d4-pawn (and if 34 ... Bxh4? Black runs into trouble due
to 35 f3!). White is passive but he can hold on.
33 ... Nc6 34 Qe3 Rf4!
A very strong entrance, after which White’s contortions to avoid losing
the key d4-pawn will leave him with a lost endgame.
35 Nf6 Bxf6 36 exf6+ Kxf6 37 Qxe4 Rxe4 38 Nf3 Ne7!
The knight heads for f5, when White won’t be able to defend the pawns
on d4 and h4 and also keep the black rook from wreaking havoc on his
second rank.
39 Kg2 Nf5 40 Rd3
Or 40 Kh3 Re2 41 Rd2 Rxd2 42 Nxd2 Nxd4 and Black wins.
40 ... Nxh4+ 41 Nxh4 Rxh4
Artemiev has won his pawn while keeping the white rook tied down to
defending d4. He smoothly wraps up the endgame.
42 Kg3 g5 43 Kg2 Re4 44 Kg3 Kf5 45 Kg2 g4 46 Kf1 b6 47 Kg2 Re1
48 b3 Ke4 49 Rd2 Rb1 50 Kg3 Kf5!
If you are winning, don’t give your opponent the slightest counterplay.
After 50 ... Rxb3+ 51 Kxg4 you might still win easily enough, but why let
White activate his king?
51 Rd3 Rh1 52 Kg2 Rh3! 0-1
This way there can be no doubt. Either White gives up the b3-pawn or has
an entirely lost pawn endgame after 53 Rxh3 gxh3+ 54 Kxh3 Ke4 55 Kg4
Kxd4.
Game 37
J.Van Foreest-D.Lewtak
European Championship, Skopje 2019
1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 Bb5 Nf6 4 0-0 Nxe4 5 Re1 Nd6 6 Nxe5 Nxe5 7 Bf1
Be7 8 Rxe5 0-0 9 d4 Bf6 10 Re1 Nf5 11 d5
White grabs space before Black is able to play 11 ... d5 with an equal
share of the centre. Given the chance he will harass the bishop on f6 with 12
Nd2 and 13 Ne4, when 14 Nxf6+ would gain him the bishop pair. Black has
to take measures against this.
11 ... g6?
Clearing the way for the bishop to retreat to g7, but it allows Jorden Van
Foreest to create an outpost square on e6. The best way to meet the positional
threat outlined above was 11 ... d6 12 Nd2 Bg5!. After 13 Ne4 Bxc1 14 Rxc1
Black has avoided weakening his kingside and made a not unwelcome
exchange of bishops. He hasn’t quite equalized but is solid after 14 ... Bd7.
12 Nd2 d6 13 Ne4 Bg7
Black has completed his plan. His bishop looks good on g7 where it
controls a long diagonal. But alas, this happy state of affairs only lasts one
move.
Question: Can you see how White can create a central outpost for his
knight?
Answer: 14 Bg5! f6
Black is forced to shut in his bishop and concede a hole on e6 as 14 ...
Qd7 15 Nf6+ Bxf6 16 Bxf6 is intolerable.
15 Bd2 Nh6
Lewtak intends to reactivate his bishop with the advance ... f6-f5, but this
will create a route to e6 for the white knight.
16 c4 Bd7 17 c5
The attack on d6 cajoles Black into carrying out his plan. As we shall see,
White is offering a strong positional pawn sacrifice.
17 ... f5 18 Ng5
18 ... Ng4
Positionally busted, Black decides to go for broke on the kingside. After
18 ... dxc5 White has no need to occupy e6 immediately with his knight. He
could build up with moves like 19 Bf4, 20 Qb3 and 21 Rad1. Then his pieces
dominate the centre. He can stab his knight into e6 to create a passed pawn
(after the more or less forced exchange ... Bxe6 and recapture d5xe6).
Instead, taking the b2-pawn with 18 ... Bxb2 would allow 19 Ne6 Bxe6
20 dxe6, when White has three threats: 21 Bxh6, pocketing a knight; 21 e7,
forking the queen and rook; and 21 e7 and 22 Qb3+, winning the bishop by
double-attack.
In these types of position it is seldom a good idea to go stealing the so-
called poisoned pawn. Even if there was no retribution of the kind above,
White could just answer 18 ... Bxb2 with 19 Rb1 Be5 20 Rxb7, regaining the
pawn and keeping all his positional assets.
19 h3!
A fearless move. Not everyone is willing to put their king on e4 in the
middlegame.
19 ... Nxf2
There’s no going back as 19 ... Nf6 20 c6! mangles him; e.g. 20 ... bxc6
21 dxc6 Bc8 (or 21 ... Bxc6 22 Ne6, winning the exchange), and with Black’s
bishop buried on c8 White can attack down the open e-file after 22 Qb3+ d5
23 Bb4 etc.
20 Kxf2 Bd4+ 21 Kf3
Also possible was 21 Ke2!? to answer 21 ... Re8+ with 22 Kf3, when
having been enticed to e8 the black rook doesn’t support the f-pawn as in the
game.
Definitely not 21 Be3? Bxe3+ 22 Rxe3 Qxg5 and Black regains his piece
with an extra pawn and attack.
21 ... f4
Attacking the white knight and clearing a line for the bishop on d7.
22 Ne6!
The only move. It is essential that the horse shelters the king on the e-file.
22 ... Qh4
Throwing another piece onto the fire to keep the attack burning. There
was no joy in 22 ... Bxe6 23 dxe6 Qh4 24 e7 Qf2+ 25 Ke4 d5+ 26 Kd3 and
Black’s initiative has fizzled out.
23 Nxd4 Qg3+
One of the secrets of defending against a sacrificial onslaught on your
king is to return some of the material to break the back of the attack. Even if
you only emerge with an extra pawn in the endgame, that can be good
enough. After 23 ... dxc5 White can surrender one of his two extra pieces
with 24 Qb3! cxd4 25 Ke2, when his king will slip back to the safety of d1.
24 Ke4
A pretty picture. The white king leads the battle from the front.
24 ... Rae8+ 25 Ne6
The knight once again takes up its post on the outpost square.
25 ... dxc5
Damian Lewtak deserves credit for his vigorous play after his inferior
opening. His attack has reached its high point. All his remaining pieces are
involved in the action. Alas for him, there aren’t quite enough of them.
Still, it looks terribly dangerous now for the white king. The threat is 26
... Rxe6+! 27 dxe6 Bc6+ 28 Ke5 and mate with 28 ... Rf5 or 28 ... Qg5. There
is in fact only one good defensive move.
Question: Only one move will do for White. Any idea what it might be?
Answer: 26 Qf3!
The lazy white queen has sat peacefully on d1 for the whole game while
her king has been blown around in a storm. But now she rouses herself just in
time to save him from mate by creating a retreat square on d3. At the same
time the power of the black queen is seriously reduced: her view along
White’s third rank has been blocked and she is being bullied by an
unacceptable offer to exchange herself for the white queen.
26 ... Rxe6+ 27 Kd3!
The remainder is pretty straightforward. Remember what we said at move
23 about giving back some material. White sacrifices his noble knight as 27
dxe6 Bc6+ 28 Kd3 Bxf3 drops the queen, though even here White has good
winning chances after 29 gxf3 due to his continuing material advantage
coupled with a strong passed pawn.
27 ... Rd6
27 ... Rxe1 28 Rxe1 Qg5 29 Kc2 is hopeless for Black. Not only is he a
piece down, his king will be wide open to an attack by White’s dark-squared
bishop.
28 Qxg3 fxg3
After 28 ... Rxd5+ the white king can venture even further up the board
with 29 Kc4 fxg3 30 Kxd5.
29 Kc3 b5
Of course if 29 ... Rxd5 then 30 Bc4 wins.
30 Re5 a6 31 Rae1 c6 32 Be3 b4+ 33 Kb3 1-0
Black loses the exchange after 33 ... Rxd5 34 Bc4 or 33 ... cxd5 34 Bxc5.
When the centre is completely open and both sides are developed, unless
there is a clear object of attack you’d imagine that a draw is very likely.
However, appearances can be deceptive, as for example in the next diagram
position below.
Game 38
A.Giri-P.Harikrishna
Shenzhen 2019
Question: How do you assess the position? What features give one player
the advantage, and how big is it?
Answer: At first sight the position looks equal, even dead equal. But
White has a series of minute advantages based on the superior mobility of his
forces and the restraint they impose on the enemy pieces. This becomes
apparent if we consider who has ascendancy over the centre squares.
White’s bishop is attacking c7 and tying down a rook to its defence. His
pawns impede the black minor pieces by denying the knights the c5- and d4-
squares and restricting the bishop (if it could be posted on f6 without any
harm being done it would still have nothing to attack there). The white minor
pieces are further up the board than Black’s and control the d6- and e5-
squares. Both the white rooks are placed on open files.
Nonetheless, there still remains the problem of how to turn this pressure
into something more tangible. Giri came up with a brilliant solution. White’s
pieces and queenside pawns are working hard, but he has one positional asset
that is doing nothing: his kingside pawns.
19 g4!
I would say that White has a substantial advantage. Most players would
be ground down by Giri here, but being a great defender he could probably
defend it against himself!
19 ... Bf8
After 19 ... Bf6 20 Ndc5 the pressure on Black’s queenside would soon
win a pawn.
20 Kg2
White has no need to hurry as there is no way for Black to shake off the
pressure.
20 ... Re8 21 Bg3
Clearing the f4-square for the advance of the f-pawn. If Black replies 21
... Re7 he also has to reckon with 22 Nf4, threatening 23 Nd5.
21 ... f6
Creating a hole on e6. However, if Black waits, Giri could push his
kingside pawns as far as f5, g5 and h5 with a stranglehold on both wings. A
well-engineered breakthrough with a move like h5-h6 would in time smash
up the black kingside.
White’s next three moves are all aimed at getting a knight to e6.
22 f4 Re7 23 f5 Rce8
It seems like Black has achieved some activity, but White can ignore the
threat to e4.
24 Nf4! Nd8
A desperate attempt to stop 25 Ne6. After 24 ... Rxe4 25 Rxe4 Rxe4 26
Rxd7 Re7 27 Rd2 Ne5 28 Ne6 White has a crushing advantage. In view of
the threat of 29 Rd8, Black has nothing better than 29 ... Rd7 30 Rxd7 Nxd7
31 Bxc7 with a lost endgame.
Question: How did Giri turn his pressure into something more concrete?
Answer: 25 Rxd7!
A combination to win a pawn.
25 ... Rxd7 26 Nxf6+ gxf6 27 Rxe8 Kf7 28 Re3 Rd2+ 29 Re2 Rd1 30
Ne6!
The e6-square still hounds Black. If 30 ... c6 then 31 Nxf8 Kxf8 32 Bf2
Rd7 33 Bd4 leaves Black a pawn down and his pieces dominated. As played
he loses a second pawn.
30 ... Nxe6 31 fxe6+ Ke8 32 Bxc7 Rd3 33 Bf4 Rd5 34 Kf3 Ke7 35 Re4
Bg7 36 Be3 f5 37 Bg5+ Bf6 38 Bxf6+ Kxf6 39 g5+ Kxg5 40 Re3 1-0
After 40 ... Rd8 41 e7 Re8 42 Re6, with the rook tied down Black soon
falls into zugzwang, while if 42 ... f4 then 43 Re5+ Kf6 44 Kxf4 wins.
Despite an objective analysis revealing White’s advantage before he
played 19 g4 I still greatly admire how Giri won ‘out of nothing’.
A Knight isn’t Always Good on an Outpost Square
Game 39
F.Caruana-Ma.Carlsen
Tromsø Olympiad 2014
Question: Magnus Carlsen is on the back foot in the diagram position.
Can you see the positional threats he is facing? How should he stop them?
Answer: The world champion has to deal with disruptive advances such
as:
a) 23 h6, breaking up Black’s kingside pawns (or leaving him with a
weak pawn on the f-file if he replies 23 ... g6).
b) 23 g5, dislodging the knight from f6 and building up on the kingside.
c) 23 e5, again pushing back the knight and this time intending to invade
with 24 Ne4 and 25 Nd6+.
But it is Carlsen’s move and he took preventive measures with:
22 ... h6!
Directly stopping 23 h6 or 23 g5 and, as we shall see, reducing the power
of White’s third option.
23 e5 Nh7
The knight has been driven to the edge, but it is a stepping stone to a
square even better than f6.
24 Ne4
At first sight putting the knight on d6 appears a mighty manoeuvre, but it
doesn’t turn out as strong as Caruana anticipated.
24 ... Rf8
Defending f7 and preparing to dissolve the potential weakness with ... f7-
f6.
25 Nd6+ Kc7 26 Bg2 Ng5
Question: But what do you think about the white knight on d6?
Have a think before reading on.
Answer: The knight might be marvellously centralized on d6 but, as
Capablanca and other great players have observed, the co-ordination of the
pieces is the most important principle in the middlegame. How is White
supposed to build on the power of the knight to execute a plan involving his
other pieces? If he plays 27 c5 the knight is strengthened even further, but it
would take away any chance to arrange an expansion with d4-d5 and cede the
d5-square to a black knight. The suspicion arises: would White’s knight
actually be better on e3 than on d6, as it would help support an advance with
d4-d5, when the bishop and rooks would come to life?
27 Rhf1 f6
Not giving White time to build up pressure against f7, when having the
knight on d6 might be justified.
28 Kc2 fxe5 29 dxe5 Nc8!
An awkward moment for White. If he exchanges on c8 not only is he
deprived of his star piece, he is left with the worse minor piece: a bishop with
no scope versus a knight which has the chance of attacking e5 from f7 at
some point in the future.
30 c5
White therefore reinforces the knight, but this means handing over d5 as a
base for a black knight.
30 ... Ne7 31 b4?
Caruana is striving to play actively when he should be settling for a draw.
31 Ra1 Nd5 32 Kd2 would hold, as Black has no obvious way to improve his
position.
31 ... Nd5 32 Bxd5
With b4 hanging and a fork looming on e3 White has little choice other
than to strengthen the black pawn centre. If not actually losing at this point
Caruana’s position is certainly deteriorating fast. The chances of holding
everything together against Carlsen are pretty slim.
32 ... cxd5
Already the threat of 33 ... Nf3, winning the e5-pawn, is hard to meet.
Caruana sacrifices it in an attempt to drum up queenside counterplay.
33 b5 axb5 34 Nxb5+ Kc6
Carlsen is aided by having a king who can threaten the overstretched
white pawns, while their own king is a passive observer.
35 Nd6 Nf3 36 b4 Ra8 37 Ra1 Rxa1 38 Rxa1 Nxe5 39 Ra7 Rb8
Black is happy to defend for the moment as his knight can gobble the
pawn on g4 as well if the white rook stays on a7.
40 Ra3 b6!
Better than 40 ... Nxg4 41 Rg3 Nf6 42 Rxg7. The pillar on e5 supporting
the white knight has already vanished and the other one on c5 is about to
crumble away.
41 Ra7 bxc5 42 Ra6+ Kc7 43 bxc5 Nd7 44 Ra7+ Kc6 45 g5 Nxc5
The knight has carried out a demolition job on the white centre (38 ...
Nxe5 and 45 ... Nxc5). The remainder is easy for a world champion.
46 Nf7 d4 47 Ne5+ Kd5 48 Nd7 d3+ 49 Kc1 Nxd7 50 Rxd7+ Ke4 0-1
There’s no hope in 51 Rxg7 Ke3 52 Rd7 hxg5 etc.
Game 40
F.Caruana-S.Karjakin
Sinquefield Cup, St. Louis 2018
Let’s try to work out what Karjakin and Caruana might have been
thinking when they discussed the position in the diagram above.
Karjakin: My plan is to drain the dynamism from White’s pawns. I will
begin with the thrust 21 ... e5. White will have to reply 22 d5 to keep his
centre intact, upon which I will retreat my knight to b8. Then there is a
newly-created hole in White’s structure on c5.
I will manoeuvre my knight there via d7, perhaps throwing in ... Ra5 to
support the knight once it reaches c5. I’ll have the horse on a great square and
the white pawns will be blocked. Having reduced them to inertia I’ll have a
safe game. After that I can try and work out a plan to undermine and destroy
them. Therefore:
21 ... e5
Caruana: I can’t take on e5 as my knight will hang, but if I’ve calculated
right I will get a good game by advancing my pawn to d5.
22 d5 Nb8
Question: Who has assessed the position correctly and what move will
prove it?
Answer: Caruana: This feels like the critical moment. If I let him get his
knight to c5 with ... Nd7 and ... Nc5, he’ll have a good game. My pawns will
be stopped in their tracks. So there’s no time to lose. I have to strike straight
away.
23 c5!
Karjakin: Well, that’s a surprise. If it works he’s breaking up my
queenside before I have time to get the blockade in place. But can’t I take the
pawn on d5?
Answer: Karjakin: That’s very strong. If I play 27 ... Rdc8 then 28 Rd1!,
and if I move my queen to safety, 29 Rd8+ wins. I could play 27 ... Rf8 28
Qxb8! Rxc4 29 Rxc4 Qxc4 30 Qxe5, but then I’m a pawn down and a4 is a
target. Let’s try to hold it together by defending e5 and making a hole for my
king to end these pesky back rank mates.
27 ... f6
Caruana: Now 28 e4 looks winning after 28 ... Qd4 29 Qe6+ Kh8 30
Nd6, planning a fatal fork on f7 or a smothered mate combo. But I’ll play
more simply.
28 Rd1 Qxd1+ 29 Rxd1 Rxd1+ 30 Kg2 1-0
Karjakin: I had better resign. 30 ... Rc8 31 Qe6+ wins a rook, and 30 ...
Rxc4 31 Qe6+ Kf8 32 Qxc4 wins easily for White once the a4-pawn drops.
Or if 30 ... Nd7 31 Qe6+ Kf8 32 Nd6, the threat of mate forces 32 ... Rxd6 33
Qxd6+ Ke8, when White has at the least 34 Qa6, winning the a4-pawn.
We might add that 21 ... e5 was a poor decision. And after 22 d5 Black
should try 22 ... Na5! rather than retreat the knight. If then 23 Qxa4? Nb7,
Black would regain the pawn on a3 while getting his knight to c5. So White
should prefer 23 Qb4 when 23 ... Nb7 (23 ... f6 is more solid) 24 Ne4! keeps
the knight from c5 and maintains the energy in his set-up.
After 22 ... Nb8?, thanks to Caruana’s vigorous response, things
happened too fast for the black knight: stranded on b8 it was not only a target
but also harmed the king by interfering with the queen’s defence of the back
rank.
Game 41
V.Anand-A.Giri
Shamkir 2019
Answer: Both players have their pieces centralized and a king safe from
attack. There are no gaping weaknesses on either side. Black has the two
bishops which in a general way constitutes an advantage.
To balance this White has the superior structure: his extra pawn in the
centre can be contrasted with the doubled black b-pawns. If he can mobilize
his kingside pawn majority in a favourable way then he will get the
advantage, assuming Black doesn’t manage to utilize his queenside majority
for counterplay. But the proviso “in a favourable way” is of great importance.
The advance e4-e5 turns the d5-square into a hole in White’s centre which
can be occupied by ... Bd5, leaving him potentially weak on the light squares.
Therefore White will only advance e4-e5 if the effect of the hole left on d5
has been neutralized in some way, or at least lessened by other positional
factors. For this reason White has to watch out that Black doesn’t manage to
play the pawn stab ... f6-f5 in a favourable manner to win control of the d5-
square.
Question: Strategically speaking, the best move for Black is 20 ... f5, but
can
you see any tactical drawbacks?
20 ... Qh5
Instead, 20 ... f5 21 e5 leaves White with the aforementioned hole on d5
which can be exploited in careful style after 21 ... h6 etc (not 21 ... f4?,
attempting to win a piece, as 22 Ng5, hitting the black queen and h7, would
cost Black a pawn); and 21 exf5 Bxf5 leaves the white centre broken up,
while 21 Ne5 Qh5 also favours Black.
Answer: But tactics come before strategy: the finest move or manoeuvre
has to be rejected if it is unsound. And here 20 ... f5? fails to 21 Ng5 Qg6 22
Nxe6 Qxe6 23 exf5, when White has won a pawn.
The game move, while not doing much actual harm, is a little too
generous as it lets White reroute his bishop to a superior post on the
queenside. Giri might have thought about getting his own bishop over there
with 20 ... Bb4!. For example, 21 Ne1 Bc8 22 Nd3 Ba5 (not 22 ... Rxd4?? 23
Nxb4 Rxb4 24 a3 and the rook is trapped) 23 b4 (after 23 Nc5 b6 24 Nd3
Rxd4 White has just lost a pawn) 23 ... Bb6 24 Nc5 a5 and Black has
sufficient counterplay.
21 Bc7!
After 21 Bh2 or 21 Ne1 Black could play 21 ... f5!.
21 ... Rd7
Here 21 ... Rc8 looks more accurate. After 22 Bb6 f5 23 Rde1 (23 e5?
looks horrible because of the hole on d5 and even drops material after 23 ...
f4 24 Re2 Bxh3 or 24 Rc3 Bb4 25 Rcd3 Bf5, winning the exchange) 23 ...
fxe4 24 Qxe4, then 24 ... Bxh3 leads to a sharp tactical exchange and
perpetual check: 25 Qxe8 Rxe8 26 Rxe8 Bxg2! (but not 26 ... Qg4? 27 Nh4!
Qxh4 28 Bc5, when the threat of mate on f8 wins for White) 27 Kxg2 Qg4+
28 Kf1 Qxf3 29 Bc5 Qd3+ 30 Kg1 Qg6+ and Black can keep on checking.
Instead, 24 ... Bd6 keeps the game going. After 25 Ne5 Bd5 26 Qd3 Black’s
bishop on d5 is a beauty, but White’s well-entrenched knight and doubled
rooks are also imposing. The position remains unclear.
22 Bb6
The bishop now supports the white centre by defending the d4-pawn
again, which frees the knight and rook on d1 for other duties (jumping ahead,
we’ll see the knight go to d3 and the rook to e1). It also restrains the black
queenside pawns from advancing and gives White extra control over c5,
which helps support his coming knight manoeuvre to that square.
22 ... Bb4?
This time 22 ... f5? is well answered by 23 Ne5, attacking the black rook.
Although Black’s two previous moves didn’t endanger his position, they
were perhaps a sign that he was ‘drifting’. It’s no wonder that he now makes
a definite mistake.
A better option is 22 ... Qg6. White can continue to probe with 23 Qc1!?,
say, intending to build up with 24 Rde1 etc, and if 23 ... Bxh3? 24 Nh4 White
wins a piece, or 23 ... Bd6? (tempted by the chance to threaten 24 ... Bf4 but
allowing a central breakthrough) 24 d5! cxd5 25 exd5 Bf7 26 Rxe8+ Bxe8 27
Re1 Bb4 28 Re6! and White is better. Instead, Black can play more carefully
with 23 ... Be7 or seek counterplay with 23 ... a5!?, when 24 Bxa5 Ra8 25
Qd2 Bd6 leaves White facing the awkward 26 ... Bf4. So 24 Rde1 Bb4 25
Nd2, intending 26 a3, looks the way to keep the game going.
23 Ne1!
Now the knight will get to the d3-square with gain of time, as 23 ... Bxe1
24 Rdxe1 leaves Black with no bishop pair to compensate for his inferior
pawn structure. It also clears the way for a future f2-f4 advance.
23 ... Bf7 24 Nd3 Bd6 25 Rde1 Bb8
Notice how White has achieved a superb co-ordination of his pieces over
the last couple of moves. The rooks and minor pieces are all ready to support
the central push.
26 f4!
Planning to push again with 27 e5.
26 ... f5
Question: How should White respond to this pawn advance?
Black’s counter-strike against e4 has been a fly in the ointment for the
whole middlegame as far as Anand has been concerned. In particular, he has
been reluctant to advance f2-f4 as long as Black can use the ... f6-f5 pawn
thrust to liquidate the e4-pawn, or force it to advance to e5, when d5 becomes
a massive hole in his centre. But now the Indian former world champion is
satisfied he can concede the d5-square to the enemy bishop without it
draining the energy from his advancing kingside pawns.
Answer: 27 Ne5! Bxe5 28 dxe5 fxe4 29 Qxe4 Rd2
After 29 ... Bd5 30 Qc2 Black has a great-looking bishop, but he doesn’t
have the thing White feared: a blockade on the light squares holding back the
centre pawns. Instead, they are free to advance with 31 e6 or 31 f5 etc, while
an attempted blockade with 30 ... g6 looks fragile and leaves the black
kingside full of dark square holes.
30 R3e2 Bd5 31 Qe3 Rxe2 32 Rxe2
Bringing an end to the black rook’s counterattack.
32 ... Qf5
Question: Give yourself a pat on the back if you can find White’s next
move!
Answer: 33 g4!!
An extraordinarily important lesson in positional chess. If White plays a
slow move such as 33 Kh2, then Black has time for 33 ... h5!, when he
succeeds in constructing a blockade on the light squares after all. Deprived of
the advance g2-g4, the dynamism has vanished from White’s kingside pawn
majority. Black could even start dreaming of playing for the advantage as his
bishop is superior to the white one blocked in by its pawn on e5.
After the game move Black’s queen gets to hassle the white king for a
while, but the key thing is that the white pawns maintain their vitality.
33 ... Qb1+ 34 Kf2 h5 35 f5 Qh1 36 Kg3 Re7
The black rook can’t help its queen, so her attack is easily rebutted by the
white pieces.
37 Bc5 Re8 38 e6
Now Black has to reckon with 39 Bd4 and 40 Qg5, aiming to mate on g7.
38 ... Kh7 39 Qg5! 1-0
A possible finish is 39 ... Qf3+ 40 Kh4 Qxe2 41 Qg6+ Kg8 42 Qxe8+ Kh7 43
Qg6+ Kg8 44 Bd4 Qe1+ 45 Kxh5 and the mate threat on g7 decides.
Chapter Six
Manoeuvring Against Pawns
If we are unable to impose direct pressure on the opponent’s pieces or attack
his king, we can still disturb the harmony of his set-up by targeting his
pawns.
The aim is to oblige one or more of the enemy pieces to defend a pawn,
so that they are hampered in their movement and work less well with the
other pieces. Our plan might also involve restriction – that is, preventing a
desired advance of a pawn or a group of pawns. Then the enemy pieces will
be denied the chance to take part in an active plan supporting the forward
moving pawn or pawns. Our manoeuvring might lead to the win of a pawn,
but by reducing the energy of the opponent’s pieces it could equally be the
groundwork for scenarios like those in Chapters One or Two.
Game 42
A.Korobov-V.Anand
German Bundesliga 2019
11 ... Nf6
Question: Can you see a tactical reason why 11 ... c5 is no longer viable
for Black?
Answer: 11 ... c5 now runs into 12 bxc5 bxc5 13 Bxh7+! Kxh7 14 Qb1+
Kg8 15 Qxb7 and White has won a pawn. Black can’t claim sufficient
compensation, as after 15 ... Qa5+ 16 Ke2 any bid to exploit the awkward
position of the white queen or king is hampered by the fact that ... Rb8 isn’t
possible as the white bishop controls b8 and, besides, the knight and d5-pawn
are hanging.
Tricks of the 13 Bxh7+ kind, setting up a double attack by the white
queen on the black king and another piece, are common in the Queen’s
Gambit when Black has castled kingside and doesn’t have a knight on f6.
Perhaps the most common pattern is: Black has an undefended pawn on c7,
no knight on f6, White has a bishop on d3. After Qc2 there is a double threat
of Qxc7 and Bxh7+, so White wins a pawn.
I doubt there are many players who haven’t fallen for this type of trap at
some point. The board can seem a large place, especially when you are
starting out in chess, and to see that the fate of a bishop on b7 is connected
with events on h7 isn’t easy. Once a player gains experience with the
Queen’s Gambit, he’ll be forever wary about falling for a tactic if his
opponent has a bishop pointing at h7 and he only has his king defending it.
12 0-0 Bd6
Because Black has moved his knight away from the queenside, his
position there is too understrength to justify the opening of lines with 12 ...
c5?. Thus after 13 bxc5 bxc5 14 Qb1!, the bishop on b7 again runs into
trouble. If 14 ... Bc6 15 dxc5, Black can’t recapture as 15 ... Bxc5 16 Rc1
will lose material, while 14 ... Qb6 15 dxc5 Bxc5 16 Qc2, intending 17 Rab1,
is very awkward for Black.
13 Qc2!
Correctly deciding that the exchange of bishops on f4, not on d6, will
benefit him the most. Black has failed to engineer the ... c7-c5 advance,
which would have left him with either hanging pawns on c5 and d5 or an
isolated queen’s pawn on d5 (we’ll examine these alternative structures in the
next two games). Instead, he is left with a backward pawn on the open file c-
file: a worse weakness than the other two pawn formations.
13 ... Bxf4
Here 13 ... Qe7 would have been more resistant, not allowing the opening
of lines.
14 exf4
Question: We’ve criticized Black’s backward pawn on c7, but how
would
you evaluate White’s isolated d-pawn and doubled f-pawns?
Hanging Pawns
Here is another development from the Queen’s Gambit line which featured in
the previous game.
Game 43
T.Nabaty-N.McDonald
London Chess Classic 2017
Black has hanging pawns on c5 and d5. That is, they are on adjacent open
files, with no pawn on either side of them to offer support. They are
vulnerable to attack: indeed, you might describe them as two isolated pawns
joined together. On the other hand, if either pawn needs defending it can
advance a square and be guarded by its brother-in-arms. Also, in contrast to
an isolated pawn structure, there is no safe square for an enemy piece in front
of either pawn as long as they remain on the same rank.
Speaking in general, hanging pawns have dynamic potential and if left
unrestrained one of them, usually the centre pawn, can sometimes advance in
‘explosive’ fashion. In the diagram position Nabaty has very sensibly
exchanged queens to reduce the aggressive value of the hanging pawns.
Nonetheless, they still have the capacity to expand. Black has to make a
decision: should he advance in the centre with 17 ... c4 or 17 ... d4 in order to
obtain maximum benefit from the hanging pawns?
Sitting at the board with my clock ticking, I recalled the games of two
chess heroes: Capablanca and Fischer. They both advanced ... c5-c4 in
similar positions. Let’s have a look at the games:
More than a hundred years ago the second world champion, Emanuel
Lasker, was warning us against making careless or pointless moves with
pawns. But still we don’t listen. I only have to recall this game to know that
I’m not above wasting time in positions where tempi are as precious as gold
dust.
Maybe have a look through your own games and see if you make similar
time-wasting moves. Were they a way to put off having to make the effort to
think or make a decision?
18 Rac1 c4
Only now did I take the plunge. We should examine the rest of the game
and then return to see how Black could have done better at move 17 and 18.
19 Ne5!
A good active response. After something slow like 19 h3 Black has 19 ...
Nb4, planning to invade on d3, when 20 Ne5 is too late after 20 ... Bd6,
intending to exchange on e5 and then go ... Nd3 anyway.
19 ... Na5!
After 19 ... Nxe5 20 Bxe5 the black centre pawns are near to death due to
the threat of 21 Bxf6 Bxf6 22 Nxd5 Bxb2 23 Rxc4. Note that Black is once
again hampered in his counterplay by the fact that White’s bishop controls
the b8-square and so prevents ... Rab8, attacking b2.
During the game I didn’t think things were too bad for Black here. With
luck there would be time for ... Ra7 and ... Rb7 to attack b2, or even ‘Capa’s’
move ... Bb4 to activate the bishop. But I had missed something.
Question: Can you see Nabaty’s next move which begins a fine plan to
undermine the d5-pawn?
Answer: 20 h4!!
The plan is simple and strong: White will advance g2-g4-g5 to drive the
black knight away from f6 and then win the d5-pawn. In the Capa and
Fischer games the advance of the white kingside pawns was never a ‘thing’.
20 ... Bb4
To counter the plan of g4-g5 Black has to take the pressure off d5 by
giving himself the resource ... Bxc3.
21 g4 Rac8
I didn’t like the look of 21 ... Bxc3 22 Rxc3 Rac8 23 Ra3 Nc6 24 Rxa6
Nxe5 25 Bxe5 Nxg4 26 Bc3, when White has a passed pawn, the superior
minor piece, and continuing pressure on d5.
22 Na4!
Now the knight invasion on b6 is very difficult to meet.
22 ... Bd6
Losing quickly. Black should have played 22 ... Rb8 and hoped for the
best, though 23 g5 Nh5 24 Bh2 looks pretty grim.
23 Nb6 Rc5
Or 23 ... Rb8 24 Nxd5, when 24 ... Bxe5 25 Bxe5 wins as b8 is hanging,
while 24 ... Rxb2 25 Nxf6+ gxf6 26 Nxc4 is a carve-up.
24 Ned7!
Winning material however Black plays.
24 ... Rb5
Or 24 ... Nxd7 25 Bxd6 Rc6 26 Be7 Re8 27 Nxd7 Rxe7 28 Rxd5 and
wins. Black could resign already. I waited until he disentangled his pieces.
25 Bxd6 Nxd7 26 Bc7 Re8 27 Nxd7 Nc6 28 Nb6 d4
A little late!
29 Nxc4 1-0
An excellent game by Nabaty, who showed complete mastery of the
tactical and strategic requirements of the specific situation after 18 ... c4.
Game 44
J.K.Duda-D.Navara
Prague 2019
Answer: After 24 Re1 Rxe5 25 Rxe2 Black can be rid of the IQP with 25
... d4!. If instead 24 Rxd5 Qe6 25 Rd2 Qxe5 26 Rxe2 Red8, the passive white
pieces and Black’s control of the open d-file (which he can increase with
moves like ... Rd6 and ... Rad8) would give him compensation for the pawn.
Duda would rather build up slowly against the IQP and tie one or more of the
black pieces down to its defence. But to begin with he must rescue his knight
from its rather precarious situation. The first step is to attack the black queen.
24 ... Qb7
After 24 ... Qe6 25 Nc6 the knight will reach d4 and with gain of time by
hitting the queen.
25 Qb2
Not only defending the knight but forcing the black bishop to choose
which diagonal to retreat along. Whichever way it goes, a retreat square will
open for the horse.
25 ... Bh5
Or 25 ... Ba6 26 Nf3 and the knight is finally ready to land on d4.
26 Nd3 f6 27 Nf4 Bf7
Some exemplary positional play by Duda has forced the black pieces
back. There isn’t much left of Navara’s initiative: his queen and remaining
minor piece (the worst one of the whole set as it is impeded by the IQP) have
taken up defensive roles guarding the d5-pawn.
It seems that Duda relaxed now. After all the hard work of rebuffing his
opponent’s initiative and getting his knight home to f3, he takes a break and
plays a ‘luxury move’. But as we shall see Black’s dynamic chances haven’t
yet been exhausted.
28 h3?
Question: Can you see Navara’s powerful response to this move?
Instead, 28 Ne2! was called for. White could then stick the knight on d4
and play to double rooks on the c-file with Rc3 etc. If Black opposed this
with ... Rac8, the resulting exchange of rooks would accentuate the weakness
of the IQP and the inferiority of the bishop to the knight. Black would still be
far from lost, but the endgame would certainly be unpleasant for him.
After the game move we should recall Nimzowitsch’s dictums that: In the
last resort position play is nothing other than a fight between mobility (of the
pawn-mass) on the one side and efforts to restrain it on the other. And: The
passed pawn is a criminal who should be kept under lock and key. Mild
measures, such as Police surveillance, are insufficient.
When you are playing a Goldfinger of chess like David Navara – I mean
a player rated well over 2700 – you should be especially careful with
preventive measures. The lack of restraint with 28 Ne2 is immediately
punished.
Answer: 28 ... d4!! 29 Qxd4!
To be fair to Duda he recovers well. After 29 exd4, in return for the pawn
Black has an open file for his rook on e8, clear diagonals for his queen and
bishop, and weaklings on d4 and b3 to attack. He can regain his pawn with a
good game; e.g. 29 ... Qe4 30 Qd2 g5 (30 ... Rad8 is good too) 31 Nd3 Qxd4.
29 ... Bxb3
Now Black intends to mobilize his queenside pawns with 30 ... b5, so
White plays a restraining move.
30 a4! b5?
Anyway. Navara still seems to be feeling euphoric at freeing his game
with 28 ... d4!! and gets carried away. He thinks that the passed pawn he
creates on the a-file, supported by the bishop, will be a strong force.
Unfortunately, the white pieces are too well placed on the queenside to make
this a viable plan.
Chances would be balanced after 30 ... Rad8 31 Qb2 Bf7 32 Rab1 Rd6.
31 axb5 a4
After 31 ... Qxb5 32 Rc5 Qb6 (or 32 ... Qb4 33 Qxb4 axb4 34 Rb1 Ra3
35 Rb5, winning the b-pawn) 33 Nd5! (perhaps Black missed the strength of
this move, which attacks the queen and also has ideas of a fork on c7) 33 ...
Bxd5 34 Qxd5+ the a-pawn drops.
32 Rc5
Keeping the extra pawn. Black is running out of activity as 32 ... a3 drops
the passed pawn after 33 Qb4.
32 ... Rec8 33 Ne2!
Intending to reorganize his pieces with 34 Qc3 and 35 Nd4, when the
knight finally reaches the d4-square where it defends b5 and attacks b3.
Looking for counterplay Black blunders his passed pawn.
33 ... Qe7
Question: Try to see a very neat tactic for Duda and work out the
variations.
Game 45
O.S.Phillips-C.N.Ross
Solihull 2017
I have had the good fortune to coach Chris Ross, the leading British blind
player, at various international events through the years. I have to admit that
his understanding of the opening lines he plays is superior to my own
knowledge of them, and I wouldn’t presume to outwit him in a tactical battle.
Fortunately, there are still ways I can help him. The diagram position was
reached in one of the games I studied with him as a warm-up to a major
event.
Question: It is Black to move. How would you assess the position?
What is Black’s best plan and what is the best starting move?
Here Chris played 27 ... e5. He gains space, restrains the white centre and
puts a pawn on the opposite square to his bishop. Surely a good idea? But as
soon as I saw this move I instantly disliked it. It might be a good move in
itself, but it isn’t part of a good plan. In fact, it hinders Black’s plan.
Answer: Black should instead be trying to break up the white pawn centre
and increase the scope of the bishop by advancing ... f7-f5 at a good moment.
If the white rook remains on f1, this will have to be done with ... g7-g6 and
then ... f7-f5. If the rook goes away ... f7-f5 might be possible ‘in one go’.
Let’s imagine that, instead of 27 ... e5, Black played 27 ... Kf8, a sensible
move aiming to centralize the king as a prelude to a future ... f7-f5 break.
Here are some sample lines:
a) 28 Kf2 Ke7 29 Ke2 Rc1 and White is tied up, as 30 Nf3 Rc2+ loses a
pawn, while after 30 Kd2 Rb1 31 Kc2 Ra1 the pin on e1 is awkward (32 ...
f5! is already on the cards).
b) 28 Rf2 Ke7 29 Rc2 Rxc2 30 Nxc2 Kd6 31 Kf2 f5 32 exf5 (32 Ke3
fxe4 33 dxe4 Ke5 wins the e-pawn) 32 ... exf5 and Black has achieved his
aim: great bishop, broken white pawns.
c) 28 Nf3 Ke7 29 Nd4 g6 30 g4 (or 30 Kf2 f5) 30 ... e5 (only now, as part
of a plan to enforce ... f7-f5) 31 Nb3 Rc2 32 Rf2 Rxf2 33 Kxf2 Bc8 34 Ke3
Kd6 and Black is ready to break up the white kingside with ... h7-h5!
followed by ... f7-f5 (note that White can’t play 35 g5 as the h3-pawn would
hang).
In the game 27 ... e5 was answered by 28 Kf2 and Black, with a slight
edge, went on to win a complex struggle after 28 ... Rc1 29 Ke3 f6. Instead,
28 Nf3! looks a better approach.
For example: 28 ... f6 (after 28 ... Rc2 29 Nxe5 f6 30 Nd7 White has
counterplay, as 30 ... Rxb2? would be a serious mistake due to 31 Rc1,
threatening 32 Rc7, winning a piece) 29 Rd1 Rc2 (29 ... Kf7 30 Kf2 a5 31
Ke3 is similar) 30 Rd2 Rc1+ 31 Kf2 Kf7 32 Ke3 and White’s pieces are in a
compact group. After 32 ... Ke7 he can activate his game with 33 d4!; e.g. 33
... exd4+ 34 Nxd4, when 34 ... Re1+?! 35 Kf2 achieves nothing for Black as
35 ... Rxe4? 36 Nf5+ Ke6 37 Nd6 is a deadly fork. Against other moves
White can also consider 33 d4.
As we can see, 27 ... e5 slows down Black’s build-up, makes the pawn on
e5 a target for both Nf3 and a future d3-d4 pawn stab, and takes away the
pillar on e6 that, along with ... g7-g6, would support Black’s own pawn lever
with ... f7-f5.
When I first saw 27 ... e5 I couldn’t articulate these objections to the
move. I just knew I didn’t like it at a gut level.
Answer: 31 Rc5!
Note that 31 fxe5? would be massively wrong, as 31 ... Qxb4 then gives
Black a passed pawn and disturbs the white knight. Even worse, after 32 Nb7
Black frees his knight with the trick 32 ... Nd5!, when it is inviolable because
the white queen hangs. This would mean the total defeat of White’s plan.
Instead, with his simple but elegant rook retreat, Carlsen blocks the attack
on b4, clears the way for Nc6, and attacks e5 again.
31 ... Rc8?
This leads to a collapse on the kingside. Karjakin must have
underestimated White’s 35th move. 31 ... exf4 was necessary. After 32 Qxf4
(32 gxf4? allows 32 ... Qxh4+), White is ready to play 33 Nc6 etc, when d4 is
a serious weakness. Nonetheless, Black could have resisted with 32 ... Nd1!,
intending 33 ... Ne3, when the knight is finally useful (in some cases it can
even go to g4 to rejoin the other pieces). The game would then be far from
over.
32 Rxc8+ Bxc8 33 Nc6 Qd6 34 Nxe5 Qxb4
It looks as if Black has gained good counterplay in the form of the passed
pawn, but Carlsen reminds him his kingside is full of dark square holes.
35 f5! Qd6
The trick 35 ... Nd5 no longer works. Among other winning replies White
has 36 Qa2!, when the knight can’t save itself as f7 would fall.
36 Nf3!
Clearing the way for the e-pawn and preparing to go to g5 in some key
lines.
36 ... gxf5
There are some fun variations after 36 ... b4 37 Qg5 b3 38 e5 Qf8 (if 38 ...
Qb6 39 Qh6, the threat of 40 Ng5 followed by 41 Qh7+ and mate on f7 is
decisive) 39 e6! b2 40 Ne5! (the tactics might seem complex, but remember,
the essential point is that White is attacking a flimsy pawn structure with
overwhelming force; everything just flows for him) 40 ... b1Q (or 40 ... fxe6
41 f6 b1Q 42 Qxg6+ Kh8 43 Nf7+ Qxf7 44 Qxf7 and mate follows on g7) 41
exf7+ Qxf7 (upon 41 ... Kh7 42 Qxg6+ Kh8 43 Qf6+ Kh7 44 Nf3 Qc1 45
Ng5+ Qxg5 46 hxg5 the advancing pawns will squash the black king and
queen) 42 Nxf7 Kxf7 43 Qxg6+ Ke7 44 f6+ Kd8 45 f7 Qb4 46 Qg8+ Kc7 47
f8Q and after all the mayhem White wins ‘on points’.
37 Qg5+ Kh7
After 37 ... Qg6 38 Qd8+ the bishop is lost.
38 e5!
Clearing the queen’s path to d8.
38 ... Qg6
The queen is forced away from the d-file as 38 ... Qd7 39 Qxh5+ Kg8 40
Ng5 wins for White.
39 Qd8
By attacking the bishop White gains time to get his knight to g5 and
capture the d4-pawn.
39 ... Be6 40 Ng5+ Kg7 41 Qxd4 Na4 42 Nh3! 1-0
Retreating to victory. Black has survived the initial wave of the attack,
but the passed pawn offers him no counterplay and his knight is still cut off
from the kingside. White’s next move will be 43 Nf4, when he could win the
h5-pawn with Bf3 and Nxh5+, or prepare simply to advance his centre pawns
(most likely Carlsen would do both). Rather than watch his position be
eviscerated, Karjakin resigned.
Game 47
E.Sutovsky-P.Eljanov
Poikovsky 2014
White has let the exchange take place on d4 so that he can recapture with
the pawn and no longer has to worry about defending e5.
Question: Try to list the features in the position which favour Black.
Answer: There are two backward pawns in the position: on f7 and d4.
Black’s king can help defend the pawn on f7 without much trouble, whereas
while there are queens on the board the white king would never venture to d3
to help his pawn. Therefore the d4-point is the greater weakness.
White’s pawns on the kingside are blocked and can’t add to his pressure
on the f-file. In contrast, Black’s pawns on the queenside are free to advance
and can co-operate with the pieces in any plan of attack on that wing.
Finally, Black’s pieces have the open c-file. His queen can aim to break
through via the holes on c4 and d3.
As long as White is unable to land a bloody blow on the f-file, we have to
conclude that Black has the advantage.
28 ... Qc4
After many moves of methodical defence Eljanov finally goes on the
attack. The d4-pawn is now attacked twice, tying down the white queen and
f4-rook to its defence.
29 Rc1
The rook takes the open file, though he won’t get to enjoy it for long.
29 ... Qd3+ 30 Ka1 Rc8!
After waiting on f8 since move 15 the rook has a stirring entrance. It is
immune due to a back rank mate.
31 Rf1 Rcc7!
Not only to regain the pawn but also defending e6 with the queen so that
35 Rxe6 isn’t an option.
35 Qf3
White’s attack is tantalizingly close to getting him a draw or even a win
with 35 Rxg6+ Kxg6 (35 ... fxg6?? 36 Qf8+ will mate as before) 36 Qf6+
Kh7 37 Qh6+ Kg8 38 g6, but the attack is beaten off by 38 ... Qa4+! (the only
way) 39 Kb1 Qc2+ 40 Ka1 Qxg6 and Black wins.
35 ... Qxb4 36 Rf4 Qa4+ 37 Kb1 Qc2+ 38 Ka1 Kg8!
Ensuring that a rook capture on f7 doesn’t come with check. This means
that 39 ... Rd5 (with the threat of 40 ... Ra5+) and other active rook moves are
on the cards.
39 Qe4 Kg7
Evidently Black was short of time and so decided to repeat moves. With
longer to think he would have seen that 39 ... Qc4, planning 40 ... Rd5, is
decisive. Presumably he was afraid of 40 Rxf7 Rxf7 41 Qxg6+, but the king
evades the checks after 41 ... Kf8 etc. Sutovsky decides not to repeat moves
as, with the time control at move 40, Eljanov would soon be able to work out
an attacking win against his king. Instead, he exchanges queens and tries to
survive the rook and pawn endgame.
40 Qxc2 Rxc2 41 d5
The only chance for active play. Otherwise the black pieces will gang up
on the d4-pawn with ... Rd2 or the b2-pawn with ... Rb7 etc.
41 ... exd5 42 Re1 d4 43 Kb1
There’s no time for 43 e6 fxe6 44 Rxe6 d3 45 Rff6 to attack g6 as the d-
pawn will roll through after 45 ... d2.
43 ... d3 44 Rd1 Re2 45 Rf3 Rb7
Black exchanges the passed pawn for two rooks on the seventh rank – a
good deal!
46 Rdxd3 Rbxb2+ 47 Kc1 Ra2 48 Kb1 Reb2+ 49 Kc1 Rh2 50 Kb1
Rae2 51 Rf1 Rxe5 52 Rd7 Rf5!
White has spent the whole game trying to break through on the f7-square
and here, after 52 ... a5??, it’s mate in three with 53 Rdxf7+. Of course
Eljanov was never going to let that happen.
53 Rxf5 gxf5 54 Rxa7 f4 55 Ra3 Kg6!
White is only one pawn down but the disparity in activity between the
two kings proves fatal.
56 Ra6+ Kf5 57 Rf6+ Ke4 58 Rxf7
He finally gets to take on f7, but it is too late to change anything.
58 ... Rxh4 59 Kc2 Rg4 60 Rg7 h4 61 Kd2 Kf3!
Putting the king on g2 is the cleanest way to win. There’s no need to get
involved in 61 ... f3 62 Ke1, though that also wins.
62 g6 Kg2 63 Rf7 h3 0-1
It remains to be asked where things went wrong for White. We can trace
the petering out of his attacking chances right the way back to 17 Bxd4, when
his bishop became an ineffective piece. In general White’s initiative was
diminished by the exchange of three minor pieces. As far as being in danger
of losing, we could point to White’s insistence on trying to exploit the f-file.
He could instead have kept his rooks centralized, say on the d-file, and
fended off Black’s initiative. But it is psychologically hard to assume a
defensive pose with the white pieces when the siren of attack is calling you.
The f-file was a blind alley that sucked all the dynamism out of White’s
position.
Game 48
A.Naiditsch-P.Svidler
Grenke Classic, Karlsruhe/Baden Baden 2019
Answer: If instead 20 e5 then 20 ... Qe6 leaves White with no good way
to improve his position, whereas Black has a host of possibilities; for
example, ... c6-c5 and ... Bb7 to put the bishop on a great diagonal, or ... Rd8
seizing the d-file, or rerouting the knight with ... Ne7 and then ... Nf5 (and
maybe ... Nd4 if defended by ... c6-c5). The white kingside pawns have
stalled leaving him with no good plan while the black pieces have all the
dynamic chances.
For this reason the eight-time champion of Russia told chess24 com that
White “absolutely had to play 20 f5 here with unclear consequences”. After
20 ... Ne5 21 Nxe5 Qxe5 22 Rd1 White has possession of the d-file. In
addition to 23 Rd7, his ideas include 23 Qd4! to exchange off queens. This
would enable his king to walk to the centre in support of the e4-pawn and
also allow a general advance on the kingside with g2-g4, h2-h4 and g4-g5
etc.
White’s pieces wouldn’t be unduly troubled by the need to defend e4, and
he would have a clear plan. In this sequence Black could decline the
exchange of queens but then he has lost his grip on the e5-square, and g7
might be left en prise.
After the game move, White’s pawn on e4 is defended four times and
attacked once. Nimzowitsch espoused a theory of overprotection, by which
he meant that key centre squares or other posts of strategic importance should
be strongly guarded, the more times the merrier. Pieces defending such
squares are likely to find themselves well placed ‘by accident’ to carry out
active plans or manoeuvres necessary for the health of the position. In a sense
Nimzo’s idea is a refinement (cynics might say an exaggeration) of the
principle of centralization: if you put your pieces on centre squares (or posts
where they influence the centre) they are more likely to find themselves co-
ordinated and ready to take part in whatever plan you formulate.
This is good advice, of a similar kind to if you don’t know what to do,
improve your worst-placed piece. You are unlikely to make any terrible
mistake if you rely on centralization (or overprotection) to guide you. Indeed,
there are many positions in the opening where it is too early to devise a
strategy: you simply have to develop and centralize and wait for the features
of the position to congeal before you can embark on a definite plan of action.
But most of the time centralization and overprotection or improving your
worst piece are feeble rules to live by. It’s far better to have a carefully
worked out strategy, or even just a little plan lasting a couple of moves. (Can
a plan last just one move!?)
I should mention that having all his pieces defending e4 doesn’t mean
that White is employing overprotection in the way that Nimzowitsch
recommended it. Guarding the e4-point isn’t adding any energy to the white
pieces: it isn’t providing a jumping off point for other operations. The
problem is that White’s natural plan is to advance his kingside pawn
majority, but he has been deterred from playing e4-e5. Instead, as discussed
above, he needed to play 20 f5!, accepting a backward pawn on e4 but
exchanging off pieces and not becoming unduly tied down to the e4-pawn. In
the likely event of a queen exchange, his kingside pawns are filled with the
energy to expand.
It’s interesting that the computer assessment hardly changes after 20 Nf2
compared with 20 f5. And yet Svidler, as quoted above, was of the opinion
that 20 f5 was indispensable. Indeed, playing through the rest of the game
you get the impression it is downhill all the way for White. Though it must be
admitted that your opponents are unlikely to manoeuvre as superbly as
Svidler: you are by no means doomed if you play the equivalent of 20 Nf2 in
your games.
20 ... Re8
Black’s plan will proceed one step at a time. First of all he centralizes his
rook and adds pressure on e4.
21 a3
Not liking 21 e5 Qb4, when both b2 and f4 are hanging.
21 ... f6
A more direct method of restraint. Svidler does his utmost to make sure
the advance e4-e5 is unattractive for White. Deprived of its power to expand,
the e4-pawn becomes in effect a backward pawn on an open file. It is already
attacked from the front by the black queen and rook. But that isn’t enough for
Svidler: he wants to attack it with both of his minor pieces as well.
Now comes the most elegant part of this game, and perhaps of any
example in this book.
Answer: 25 ... Nf8!!
The start of a very long journey. It isn’t normally advisable to carry out a
luxurious manoeuvre with the knight on the back rank. An alert opponent will
disrupt it by doing something active, when the absence of the knight from the
immediate struggle will be keenly felt. But here White’s position is too
lacking in vitality to allow any riposte.
26 c3 a4
Fixing the pawns on the queenside to prevent 27 b4.
27 h3 Ne6 28 Ng3
The horse retreats before it is pushed back by 28 ... g6.
28 ... Bc6!
Defending the a4-pawn and the d7-square, but most importantly clearing
the b7-square for the knight.
29 Rd2 Nd8!
Beginning a three-move gallop to d6.
30 Qd3 Nb7 31 Kh2 Nd6!
An impressive manoeuvre from g6. The knight attacks e4, blocks the
white pieces from using the d-file, and is ready in some cases to go to c4 to
attack the b2-pawn.
32 Rd1
34 ... Qb3!
Overloading the defence, as e4 and b2 can’t both be adequately defended.
It was also possible to target the e4-pawn directly with 34 ... Qg6!, when
35 f5 loses to 35 ... Nxf5!, winning a pawn as 36 exf5 allows mate on g2. Or
if 35 Nd2 then 35 ... f5! and e4 drops, as mate again follows on g2 if White
moves the pawn from e4.
35 e5
Or 35 Qb1 Nc4, when 36 Re2 or 36 Nd1 both allow 36 ... Nxa3, winning
a pawn to start with.
35 ... fxe5 36 fxe5 Qxb2 37 Re2
Or 37 exd6 Rxe1 38 d7 Bxd7 39 Qxd7 Qxf2 and Black wins.
37 ... Qb5!
38 Qc2
If 38 exd6 Rxe2 39 c4 Qb2 40 d7, then 40 ... Bxd7 41 Qxd7 Rxf2 is a
steady win, while letting White queen with 40 ... Rxf2 41 d8Q+ Kb7 is the
fastest and most elegant method – disaster follows on g2 for White.
38 ... Nc4 39 e6 Nxa3 0-1
After 40 Qd1 Nb1 41 Re3 a3 Black can think about queening one of his extra
pawns.
Chapter Seven
Promoting a Pawn
A common plan is to mobilize a pawn majority in order to create a passed
pawn. We can expect to meet enormous resistance, as any worthy opponent
knows that to let us queen will almost certainly mean his defeat. Therefore he
will use techniques of the kind discussed in Chapter Three to thwart the
advance of our pawns, or might try to deflect us from our plan by launching
an assault on our king.
We’ll begin by looking at examples of an overtly tactical nature where a
pawn cannot be stopped from queening, so the opponent must seek
immediate tactical salvation. Then we’ll examine games of a more strategic
nature which feature a pawn majority versus a kingside attack. Finally, we’ll
consider the use of a blockade to avert the advance of the pawns.
Game 49
A.Demchenko-D.Gukesh
Ho Chi Minh City 2019
42 e6!
With this move White was planning not only to create a passed pawn but
also to break open lines against the black king. Already the exchange down
and in a desperate situation, Gukesh has to maximize his chances for a
swindle. King safety? Stopping the opponent queening? Nah, forget it. What
matters is counterplay! And so:
42 ... Rd8! 43 Qxd8 Qxb3 44 e7
Demchenko has to let his opponent queen first. But he is fine with that as
he judges that his own king will be able to evade checks, whereupon the
threat of mate to the black king on g8 or h8 once he himself queens will be
decisive. A correct assessment, but it puts enormous pressure on him to find
the only refutation to Black’s next move.
44 ... Qb7+!
Question: A tricky check. Can you work out how White should respond?
45 Kh3?
An entirely natural move – which loses the game.
Answer: The way to win was 45 Rf3! b1Q 46 e8Q, when Black has the
next move, which is often decisive with four queens on the board. However,
the mate threat to the black king trumps everything. For example:
a) 46 ... Qxf5 47 Qg8+ Kg6 48 Qb6+ Qxb6 49 axb6 Qc2+ 50 Kh3 wins.
Vitally, the f7-pawn is hanging to the white queen.
b) 46 ... Qc2+ 47 Kg1! (again the only move but it leaves Black with no
good checks) 47 ... Qa7+ 48 Kh1 or 47 ... Be3+ 48 Qxe3.
45 ... b1Q 46 e8Q
Question: Can you see the killer blow White had missed?
White had staked everything on his attack and it indeed seems menacing.
There is the threat of mate on g7 as well as a scary check on h8. If Black
plays 45 ... Qxe5+ 46 Rxe5 c1Q then 47 Qxg6+ leads to a quick mate.
Game 51
R.Rapport-A.Giri
Wijk aan Zee 2019
Rapport has completed his build-up on the queenside. All his pieces are
poised for action against the queenside pawns. The problem is that there is no
good way to continue the attack. Well, it’s not a problem if you are a
computer or a staid old grandmaster. You just settle for a way to repeat
moves: for example, 21 a3 Be7 22 Rd2 (but not 22 Nc3? Bxd3) 22 ... Kh7 23
Nc3 Ba6 24 Na4 Bb5 etc with a draw by repetition. However, Richard
Rapport is a young and ambitious player with a creative style. If there is a
brick wall on the queenside he will go straight through it:
21 Nxb6? Qxb6 22 a4
This is the idea. White will regain his piece, after which his rooks will
bust through on the c-file. However, Giri finds a simple positional refutation
of the plan:
22 ... Ra8! 23 g4
Rapport sees what’s coming on the queenside and so prepares a counter
demonstration on the kingside.
23 ... Qd8!
Question: What should Black play after White recaptures on b5?
Answer: 24 axb5 a4
This is the point: the white queen can’t stay guarding b5, so Black gets a
powerful queenside pawn majority.
25 Qc3 cxb5 26 Qc6
White’s plan to dominate the c-file turns out to be an idle fantasy as there
is nothing much to attack along it.
26 ... b4 27 Bc7 Qg5 28 f4 Qg6 29 e4
Defending the d3-pawn. Rapport presses on with his bid for kingside
activity since he can’t just wait for Black’s queenside pawns to roll forwards.
29 ... h5!
The only real drawback to Black’s set-up is that his queen has become
separated from her rooks and has no influence on the queenside. Giri hopes to
use her actively on the kingside – or at least facilitate her return to the other
black pieces – by punching a hole in White’s structure.
30 g5 h4 31 Kf2 a3 32 b3 Rec8 33 Qb7 dxe4 34 dxe4 f6!
Now White’s position is tottering. The need to watch over the a3-pawn
interferes with the co-ordination of his pieces; the g5-pawn is hanging; and
the black queen is poised to slip back to f7, rejoining the rest of her army and
pinning the white bishop. Rapport tries one last throw of the dice but it is
easily defeated.
35 Be5 Rxc2+ 36 Rxc2
Question: How would you swindle Black after 36 ... Qe8 37 gxf6 a2 - ?
And what happens if 37 ... gxf6 instead?
36 ... Re8!
Answer: Rapport had set up a swindle upon 36 ... Qe8? 37 gxf6, when:
a) 37 ... a2? 38 f7+! Qxf7 39 Qxa8 wins for White.
b) 37 ... gxf6! 38 Bxf6 a2 39 Rc7! and now 39 ... a1Q 40 Rg7+ mates,
though Black can hold a draw with 39 ... Qg6! 40 Qxa8 Qg3+ as he can give
perpetual check.
37 gxf6 gxf6 38 Kf1
Hoping for 39 Rg2, winning the queen, but Giri cleverly makes sure it is
Black, not White, who seizes the g-file:
38 ... Re7! 39 Qc6 Rg7 40 Qxe6+ Kh7 0-1
Black is threatening 41 ... Qg1+ 42 Ke2 Rg2+ 43 Kd3 Qf1+ 44 Ke3 Rg3+
45 Kd2 Rd3 mate, to say nothing of 41 ... fxe5 or 41 ... Qxe4.
The two basic plans in a game of chess – trying to mate the enemy king and
attempting to queen a passed pawn – often come into conflict. While one
player is throwing his pieces forwards trying to crash through a king’s
defences, the other player is trying to hold on long enough to queen a pawn
and then win due to his superior material forces.
Game 52
S.Mamedyarov-Ding Liren
FIDE Candidates, Berlin 2018
27 ... a5!
Ding Liren makes his intentions clear: advance the queenside pawn
majority, break through the white defences, and queen a pawn. Of course this
isn’t as easy as it sounds, especially when you are playing an opponent at the
peak of his game and rated 2809.
28 g4
It’s worth mentioning that White had another possibility: 28 Nxe6!? fxe6
29 Bxe6+ Kf8 30 d5 Qxe3+ 31 Kxe3 with a double-edged endgame.
White has only two pawns for the piece, but they are passed pawns, and
his king and rook quickly become very active; e.g. 31 ... Bd7 32 Bxd7 Nxd7
33 Rc7 Ke8 34 Kd4. However, Black can hold the balance by giving a pawn
back to activate his own rook: 34 ... b4! 35 Ra7 Rc8 36 Rxa5 Rc2 with equal
chances.
Alternatively, Black could play 31 ... Bxd5, when 32 exd5 Nxd5+ 33
Bxd5 Rxd5 has burnt out to a draw, but 32 Rd1!? Bxe6 33 Rxd8+ Ne8 34
Ra8 a4 35 a3 is another hard to judge endgame. White can push his centre
pawns but if he loses control (for example, if the knight gets to c4) he could
suddenly be in trouble. The best assessment is probably that Carlsen in top
form would win it with either colour.
Let’s see what happened in the game:
28 ... a4 29 Bc2
Perhaps the best line of play is 29 Bd1! Nd7 30 Nd3 (hoping to get the
chance for 31 d5!, when Black is in trouble as the exchange of queens will
leave his bishop hanging) 30 ... Ba8 (avoiding the trap) 31 Rb1 Rc8 (or 31 ...
Qc7 32 Kg2, guarding the h2-square, when White is safe) 32 Bxa4!? Qc7 33
Bd1 Qh2+ 34 Ke1 Qxa2 35 Rxb5 Qh2 36 Qf2 Qh1+ (36 ... Qxh3?? 37 Rh5!
unexpectedly wins the black queen) 37 Qf1 Qh2 38 Qf2 with a draw by
repetition.
29 ... Nd7!
30 Bd3?
It’s a serious mistake to allow the exchange of knights as, hereafter,
White has one fewer piece to oppose the advancing queenside pawns or
complicate matters on the kingside. Therefore 30 Nd3 was called for. Then
the impetuous 30 ... b4 meets with a trap we have already seen in the
previous note: 31 d5!, attacking c6 and offering the exchange of queens.
Black would lose his precious b-pawn. Instead, 30 ... Ba8 keeps a marginal
edge.
30 ... Nxc5 31 Rxc5 b4 32 Bc4 Bd7
As we shall see, White’s problem isn’t a black pawn storming to b1, since
he has the b3-square covered three times and his bishop can always oppose
the pawn’s queening. What troubles him is a pawn sac with ... b4-b3, clearing
the way (after the recapture a2xb3) for the advance ... a4-a3. His defensive
resources on the a-file are much worse than on the b-file.
33 g5
White was feeling either optimistic or desperate at this point. He goes
active as it would be a kind of slow death to wait for Black to arrange a
breakthrough on the queenside.
33 ... hxg5 34 Qxg5 Be8
He could already play 34 ... b3!.
35 Qe7 b3! 36 axb3 a3!
Question: But can White can complete his side of the deal by mating the
black king, or at least forcing an honourable draw by perpetual check?
Answer: Without wishing to spoil the denouement for you, I think the
distribution of exclamation marks and question marks over the preceding
moves should give you a big clue to the answer! But have a go at working out
the tactics.
40 exf7+ Bxf7 41 Bxf7+ Kh7 42 Qh4+ Qh6 43 Rh5!
It looks as if White might draw the game by nabbing one of the queens,
but:
43 ... Qa7+! 0-1
Mamedyarov was hoping for 43 ... Qd4+ 44 Kg2 Ra1 (note that the white
bishop guards a2) which looks great as mate on g1 is threatened, but 45 Qf2!
holds on (whereas inserting 45 Rxh6+? gxh6 loses as 46 Qf2 is met by 46 ...
Qg7+, winning the bishop).
Rather surprisingly Ding Liren’s move in the game is the only one that
wins. White resigned as 44 Kg2 Qxf7 45 Rxh6+ gxh6 leaves him a rook
down.
In our next example the attack on the king and the advance of the passed
pawns happen on the same wing. You can bet that leads to one tough fight!
Game 53
H.Melkumyan-S.Shankland
Batumi Olympiad 2018
The position below arose from the super-sharp Botvinnik System in the
Semi-Slav. When they devise a plan players are trying to tell their own story
about a position. Their gallant pieces armed with an immaculate strategy are
going to defeat the ill-led enemy rabble. For instance, in the diagram: are the
black pawns on c3 and b4 heroes or villains? It depends on whether you are
playing White or Black.
Material is even. Black has a protected passed pawn only two squares
from queening. The white pawn on b3 would be very weak in an endgame: its
loss would mean a complete collapse on the queenside, allowing Black to
acquire connected passed pawns. White has his own protected passed pawn
on the kingside, but the idle fellows on h4 and g3 are no match for the
dynamic duo on c3 and b4.
So there we have it: the pawns on c3 and b4 are heroes.
Or at least that is what Black would claim. White might disagree: we are
still in the middlegame; who cares about the endgame if I can mate the black
king? The two pawns on g3 and h4, rather than being lazy, are noble fellows
who have sacrificed their chance of glory by staying back to shield their king.
Meanwhile, the reckless pawns on c3 and b4 have abandoned the defence of
their own king in the pursuit of fame. What scoundrels!
Who is right? Let’s see how the game unfolded:
27 Qe2!?
It looks as if White is right: the advance of the pawns to b4 and c3 has left
the f1-a6 diagonal open, allowing the white queen to slip into b5 or threaten
what looks a terrible check on a6.
Game 54
C.Sandipan-V.Ivanchuk
Gibraltar 2018
Question: Try to evaluate the position. What features favour White and
Black?
What is the best move?
Answer: In a middlegame position the exchange of two minor pieces for
an enemy rook and pawn is normally a bad idea. Indeed, it wouldn’t feel
strange to describe it in terms of sacrificing two pieces for a rook and pawn,
despite the fact that in numerical terms it is an equal exchange.
Two minor pieces usually do more work than a rook and a pawn in a
middlegame. They can combine their power with the other pieces to guard
centre squares or launch an attack on the enemy king. A rook is often no
more useful as a defender of its king than a bishop or knight, so the defence
would be overstrained.
A rook can’t usually show its full strength until the endgame, when more
of the pawns have been exchanged off, granting it open lines. And even then,
for advantage the rook usually needs to be doing something special, such as
sitting on the seventh rank or supporting a far-advanced passed pawn.
Normally, the exchange of queens is a big help to the player with the rook
and pawn – there is no more danger of a mating attack and the long-range
rook can try to overstretch the two minor pieces.
But Sandipan reasons something as follows: the black minor pieces are a
long way from creating threats to White’s king (we assume he has castled
kingside). The knight on b8 is still asleep, and the bishop on a4 can’t aim
itself against g2 any time soon. Meanwhile, the white queenside pawns are
released from the bind and will be able to advance rapidly.
White has another advantage: the next move. If he plays slowly with 15
0-0 then Black can organize his pieces with ... Nc6. Recalling the advice of
Pillsbury that “you should castle because you have to or want to, not just
because you can”, he played:
15 Qb4!
The queen attacks both a4 and b7. If Black responds 15 ... Bc6 then his
knight is deprived of its natural square. Furthermore, on c6 the bishop is a
target for a future b4-b5 advance.
15 ... Qd7
The natural reply. We could describe 15 Qb4 as a preventive or
prophylactic move, since by side-tracking the black queen it stops her
attacking on the kingside with ... Qg5. Instead, a big positional battle is about
to begin on the queenside.
16 0-0
Have a look through your games and see if you tend to castle too early.
Did you lose a vital tempo which affected the struggle in the centre or
elsewhere? Were you a tempo short at the critical moment because you had
castled, when your king could have been still sitting happily on e1? Or did
you by castling kingside let your opponent know where your king lived too
early, so he could commit himself to an attack on it? Did you miss the chance
to castle queenside and start an attack on the opponent’s king because you
went kingside too early? Did you castle and then the queens quickly came
off, meaning your king would have been better left in the centre for the
endgame? (N.B. If you don’t castle and get mated in the centre in 12 moves,
then all I can say is sorry.)
In this position Black should in fact now castle with a double-edged game
in prospect. White can edge his pawns forward on the queenside beginning
with 17 b3. He would play a pawn to a4 and only then advance his pawn to
b4 in order to prevent the enemy bishop using the light squares a4 and b5.
After that, he would be ready for the advance b4-b5. However, this takes a lot
of time and Black could aim for a set-up such as: bishop on a6, knight on c6,
and then play ... e6-e5! to create a passed pawn on the d-file and enhance the
power of the knight. If he could widen the struggle in this manner, his two
minor pieces might eventually come out on top.
Ivanchuk chooses a different plan: immediate action against the
queenside pawns.
16 ... Qb5?
He couldn’t play 16 ... Nc6 at once as a4 would hang. But if now 17
Qxb5+ Bxb5, Black is ready to play 18 ... Nc6, when one of the white rooks
will be tied down to the defence of d4. It seems that White’s initiative is
running out of steam, but Sandipan had prepared another sacrifice.
17 b3!
Giving Black no choice but to allow the opening of the a-file.
17 ... Qxb4 18 axb4 Bb5
If 18 ... Bxb3 then 19 Ra7!, followed by 20 Rxb7, creates monstrous
passed pawns.
But after the game move it seems like Black is going to triumph
according to Nimzowitsch’s motto for dealing with an enemy passed pawn
(which equally applies to dealing with an advancing enemy pawn complex):
“first restrain, second blockade, third destroy!” White’s pawns are blocked,
and if he saves his rook with 19 Rfc1 then 19 ... Kd7 prepares 20 ... Nc6 to
eat b4 or d4. After 20 Ra8 Rc8 or 20 Ra7 Kc7 Black is again ready for 21 ...
Nc6. Nor does 19 Ra8 help White after 19 ... Kd7, followed by ... Rc8 and ...
Nc6. Black’s king and minor pieces have reduced the pawns to inertia and his
horse then gets to feed on them.
It seems like another great positional victory for Ivanchuk. But it turns
out to be a mirage after Sandipan’s next move.
19 Ra7!
Black’s king could meet 19 Ra8 with 19 ... Kd7, but is one move too far
away to meet the immediate attack on b7. If 19 ... Ba6 or 19 ... Bc6 then 20
b5! follows and b7 or the bishop will drop. Therefore Black takes the rook.
19 ... Bxf1 20 Rxb7
A vital zwischenzug to establish connected passed pawns. If Black saves
his bishop he loses both the knight and the rook.
20 ... Nc6 21 Kxf1
21 ... 0-0
“Castle because you have to or want to ... ” According to my computer
Black could have held on with 21 ... Rf8, keeping the king close enough to
fight the advance of the queenside pawns. For example: 22 b5 Nxd4 23 b6
Kd8 24 Ra7 (a key line is 24 b4 Kc8 25 Ra7 Kb8, holding up the pawns) 24
... Nc6 25 Rc7 Ne5 26 b4 Nd7 27 Ke2 e5 and White can cash the pawns in
for the knight whenever he wants, but he can’t win.
Ivanchuk is a fabulous player with a quirky style, but it is beyond even
him to find such a sequence of moves.
22 b5
The blockade has failed. The passed pawns, abetted by the rook on the
seventh rank, prove too powerful for the black rook and knight.
22 ... Na5
Or 22 ... Nxd4 23 c6 etc.
23 Rc7 1-0
Game 55
J.K.Duda-R.Rapport
Wijk aan Zee 2019
A tense situation in which two of the most promising young players in the
world are battling it out. Enticed by the dark square holes around the black
king, Jan-Krzysztof Duda ‘went for it’ with:
31 Nb3!? Bxb3 32 Qd8?
As a general rule, if you think you see a good move, you should play it.
It’s better to lose the occasional game than not to trust what your chess
instinct or judgment or calculation recommends. On the other hand, if
experience has taught you that you tend to blunder in time pressure, then it
might be a wise decision not to provoke a tactical crisis when short of time.
Or if a certain opponent has the habit of outplaying you in double-edged
battles, then you might decline to play the ‘best’ but messy move in favour of
a solid, but not so objectively advantageous, alternative.
As you get better at chess you’ll learn what tends to work and what
doesn’t. If, for example, you calculate a line which seems good for you, but
your intuition is telling you “no, no, no!” should you trust your analysis or
your gut feeling? (Your intuition isn’t always right – it can make you afraid
of ghosts. But an uneasy feeling of “there’s something not quite right here”
can equally indicate your calculation has been too optimistic and you’ve
missed something good for the opponent.)
With hindsight it was better for White to call it a draw with 32 Qb2
(threatening mate as in the game and, vitally, keeping the black rook out of
c1), when after 32 ... Rc8 33 Rxc8 Qxc8 34 Qxb3 Qc1+ 35 Kf2 Qd2+ 36 Kf1
Kg7 37 Qa3 it’s equal.
Better than a draw with 37 ... Rh4+ 38 Qxh4 Be6+ 39 g4 Qf1+ 40 Kg3
Qe1+ 41 Kh3 Qf1+ etc.
38 Rxc8
Of course 38 Qxc8 Be6+ wins the white queen.
38 ... Be6+ 39 g4 hxg4+ 40 fxg4
After 40 Kg2 gxf3+ 41 Kxf3 Qf1+ 42 Ke4 (or 42 Kg3 Qh3+) 42 ... Qf5+,
White loses in prosaic style as the rook drops.
40 ... Qxe3+ 41 Kh4
Or 41 Kg2 Qe2+, when going to h1 or h3 with the king allows mate,
while otherwise 42 ... Qxg4+ picks up the rook.
41 ... Qf2+ 0-1
For 42 Kh3 Qf3+ mates on g4, while 42 Kg5 Bxc8 leaves White unable
to recapture on c8 without allowing another mate in one.
One thing I’ve noticed is that most inexperienced players hate making
positional sacrifices. If they give up a pawn they want a mate in return or,
failing that, at least to be shown how they will get the pawn back. To be told
“you have a strong knight and long-term pressure” isn’t enough. I can
sympathize, as pressure is something intangible: what if it suddenly vanishes
and you are still a pawn down?
I hope the following game will satisfy everyone. There is a splendid
double pawn sacrifice which transitions smoothly into a mating attack.
A basic aim of dynamic chess is to add power to your pieces while
diminishing, or at least not improving, the energy level of the opponent’s
pieces. In pursuing this strategy a sacrifice can be highly effective if it opens
lines for your own forces while keeping the enemy’s locked in.
In the game below, the opening of lines completely wrong-foots the white
pieces. It becomes one of the most severe punishments you will ever see for
decentralizing a piece.
Game 56
S.Karjakin-A.Esipenko
World Rapid Championship, Riyadh 2017
Answer: Why has Black’s takeover of the centre gone so swellingly? The
positional basis is the terrible white knight which is doing nothing to contest
the key squares c5 and d4. White’s bishop on f1 is unable to contribute
anything to the fight against the black minor pieces. Therefore Black has
been able to establish a blockade on the central dark squares.
I hope you can see how Black’s pieces have been empowered by the
double pawn sacrifice and, equally, the white pieces diminished – the bishop
on c1 deprived of the ability to fight for d4 and the white queen blocked from
using her power along the third rank.
The task for Black now is to drive home a direct attack on the white king
before the knight on h5 is able to return to the fray. We’ll soon see how this
is done.
21 ... Nc3+ 22 Ka1 Qb3!
Threatening mate in one, while 23 axb3 Nxb3 mate would be a fitting
tribute to the black knight. All your ingenuity will fail to discover winning
combinations in equal positions. But when you have central domination,
fantastic (and sound) moves appear of their own accord.
23 bxc3 Qxc3+ 24 Bb2
24 Kb1 Qxc1 is mate, while 24 Rb2 Qxc1+ is the same as the game but
with Black’s bishop still on the board.
24 ... Bxb2+ 25 Rxb2 Qc1+ 26 Rb1 Nc2+ 27 Qxc2 Qxc2 28 g3 b5!
Energetic to the end. One of the signs of a very strong player is that they
don’t ease up once they have a winning position. Esipenko batters his
opponent with the most precise move, not ‘coasting’ despite having a large
material advantage. If now 29 Rxb5 Qc1+ 30 Rb1 Qc3+ 31 Rb2 then 31 ...
Kd7! clears the way for 32 ... Rb8 and White will soon be pulverized down
the open file.
29 cxb5 Rd4 0-1
There is no good way to meet the threat of 30 ... Qc3+ 31 Rb2 Rb4 32
Rhh2 Qc1+ and mate next move.
Game 57
M.Matlakov-L.Aronian
FIDE World Cup, Tbilisi 2017
The position is very similar to the Grünfeld Defence but with Black’s
bishop on e7 rather than g7. For example, compare the line 1 d4 Nf6 2 c4 g6
3 Nc3 d5 4 cxd5 Nxd5 5 e4 Nxc3 6 bxc3 Bg7 7 Nf3 c5 8 Rb1 0-0. In the
Queen’s Gambit version having a pawn on e6 and no structural loosening
with ... g7-g6 would suggest that Black is more secure against an attack. On
the other hand, he doesn’t have Grünfeld counterplay based on the bishop on
g7 attacking d4, nor the option of ... Bg4 to pin the f3-knight (the pawn on e6
is in the way). We might conclude that with 4 ... Nxd5 Aronian mixed things
up, but he still hasn’t achieved as much activity as he would have with a
bishop on g7.
9 Bc4 Qc7 10 Qe2
Guarding the bishop against discovered attack by 10 ... cxd4.
10 ... a6 11 a4
Another preventive measure, this time against the positional threat of 11
... b5, gaining space on the queenside.
11 ... cxd4 12 cxd4 Bd7
After the natural 13 Bb3 to defend his a-pawn, Black can activate his
queenside pawns with 13 ... b5!. This is awkward for White, who definitely
doesn’t want to be deprived of the right to castle after 14 axb5? Bxb5, but
otherwise Black will get a passed pawn with 14 ... bxa4. So Matlakov ignored
the threat with:
13 0-0 Rc8
After 13 ... Bxa4 White gets a similar initiative to that in the game. By
attacking the bishop on c4 Aronian gives his opponent another chance to
‘chicken out’ with 14 Bb3, when 14 ... b5 once again activates the black
queenside pawns. But Matlakov insists on sacrificing the pawn.
14 Bd3 Bxa4
If Black refuses the offer with 14 ... Nc6, he has no compensation for the
fact that White has a centre with a lot of expansive potential, while Black’s
queenside pawns remain passive. In effect, he would have lost the battle of
pawn structures. So Aronian grabs the pawn to cheer himself up. If White’s
initiative dies out then Black’s queenside pawns (now connected passed
pawns!) will have the last word.
15 d5!
White has to stake everything on the burst of energy given to his pieces
by his advancing centre. Kasparov won a lot of games in this style when he
was a young man. He would break open the centre and then slice through the
enemy king’s defences before his opponent had time to put up effective
barriers or mobilize all his pieces. Indeed, in an early book I argued with
some seriousness that the secret of Kasparov’s success was getting his rooks
into key positions while those of the opponent were still sleeping.
Of course no style of play is without drawbacks. If the opponent succeeds
in weathering the storm, the attacker will have spent all his active pawn
moves. There will be no chance to revert to a slow manoeuvring game with
the intention of grinding down the opponent in the endgame. Even worse, the
attacker could be left material down.
Korchnoi described the young Kasparov’s play as “one big punch”. This
wasn’t meant as a compliment: Korchnoi was hoping before their 1983
Candidates semi-final match that he could avoid being overwhelmed by
Kasparov’s opening prep and then outplay him in the later stages of the
game. As it turned out Korchnoi started off well in the match, before losing a
key game to a sucker punch ... in a rook and pawn endgame.
Nonetheless, as we see in the present game, this style of play can be very
effective, especially if backed up with a knowledge of theory.
15 ... Nd7
Not wanting to open a diagonal for the bishop on d3 and the e-file for the
queen after 15 ... exd5 16 exd5. Instead, 15 ... e5 at least temporarily blocks
lines in the centre, but it leaves White with a permanently strong pawn on d5.
Therefore he no longer has to rush to do-or-die: he can build up his game
with 16 Be3 Nd7 17 Rfc1.
16 e5!
Another pawn stab in the centre. It threatens to win a bishop by both 17
d6 and 17 Qe4!, attacking a4 and menacing mate in two on the kingside. So
Aronian takes a second pawn and safeguards both bishops.
16 ... exd5 17 e6
The third pawn spears the soft underbelly of the black kingside – the f7-
pawn – which has become exposed by the two earlier pawn offers.
17 ... Nf8 18 exf7+ Kxf7
The king decides to brave the open air rather than hide in the corner, as
after 18 ... Kh8 19 Ne5 etc the pawn on f7 would be an eternal torment for
the defence, even if it came to an endgame.
19 Nd4?
I like the nonchalance of this move. It calmly brings the knight in contact
with the e6- and f5-squares and clears the way for the queen to move to f3, g4
or h5. It works a treat by provoking Black’s next move.
Nevertheless, the ‘boring’ 19 Re1!, putting the rook on the open file,
looks more precise as it ties the black king down to the defence of e7 and so
stops it retreating to g8, while 19 ... Bf6 is met by the same move as in the
game.
19 ... Bf6?
It is very natural to attack the knight, but he had to try 19 ... Kg8!. White
keeps up his initiative after 20 Nf5 Bf6 21 Qg4, say, but there is no killer
blow.
Question: Can you see a clever move to stop the black king escaping
from
the centre? Maybe work out a couple of variations?
Answer: 20 Bxh7!
The knight proves overworked on f8 as it has to defend both the e6-
square and h7-pawn. The loss of h7 not only severely weakens the black
kingside, it also prevents the king slipping back to g8.
20 ... Qe5
Aronian covers the e-file, stops a check on h5, and offers the exchange of
queens – something anathema to anyone trying to mate the enemy king.
White now has a knight and a bishop hanging, so his attack needs to break
through or he’ll be in trouble. It will turn out that the rook’s entry on b7 will
add the necessary oomph to his attack.
We should also consider what would have happened if Black had taken
the bait on either h7 or d4.
After 20 ... Nxh7 21 Qe6+ Kf8 22 Ba3+ Be7 23 Rbc1! Black’s queen
can’t defend both c8 and e7 in key lines. For example: 23 ... Qd7 24 Bxe7+
Qxe7 25 Rxc8+ wins, and 23 ... Bc6 24 Nxc6 bxc6 (or 24 ... Bxa3 25 Ne5
Bxc1 26 Ng6 mate) 25 Rxc6! Qxc6?! 26 Bxe7+ Ke8 27 Bd6+ Kd8 28 Qe7 is
mate.
Alternatively, 20 ... Bxd4 leaves the black king hopelessly stuck in the
centre: 21 Qf3+ Ke7 (or 21 ... Bf6 22 Qxd5+ Ke8 23 Re1+ Be7 24 Rxb7 is
crushing, while 22 ... Ne6 23 Rxb7 wins the queen) 22 Re1+ Ne6 23 Qg4
(attacking both d4 and e6) 23 ... Be5 24 Ba3+ Kd7 25 Qxa4+ Kd8 26 Qg4
and Black is being pulverized with only a measly pawn for comfort.
21 Rxb7+ Bd7
21 ... Nd7 22 Qg4! is similar.
22 Qg4!
22 ... Qxd4
After 22 ... Nxh7 23 Rxd7+ Kg8 24 Nf5! White has a decisive attack.
There is already the threat of 25 Nh6+ Kh8 (or 25 ... Kf8 26 Rf7+ and it’s
mate next move) 26 Nf7+, winning the queen.
If instead 22 ... Rd8, then 23 Nf3! Qe6 24 Qh5+ g6 25 Bxg6+! Nxg6 26
Qh7+ Kf8 (26 ... Bg7 27 Ng5+ wins the queen again) 27 Bh6+ Ke8 28
Qxg6+ is disastrous for Black.
23 Rxd7+ Nxd7 24 Qxd7+ Be7 25 Re1 Qe5
Attempting to save himself by utilizing a back rank mate after 26 Rxe5??
Rxc1+. But Matlakov isn’t ruffled. 25 ... Qf6 26 Ba3 Re8 27 Qxd5+ was also
hopeless.
26 Bd2 Rd8
Black is also crushed after 26 ... Qd6 27 Qf5+ Ke8 28 Bg5 Rc7 29 Bg6+
Kd8 30 Qf8+ Kd7 31 Qxa8 etc.
27 Qg4 1-0
If the black queen retreats, White can sacrifice a bishop to get control of
the e6-square with a quick mate: 27 ... Qf6 28 Bg5! Qxg5 29 Qe6+ Ke8 (or
29 ... Kf8 30 Qg8 mate) 30 Bg6+ Qxg6 31 Qxe7 mate; or 27 ... Qd6 28 Bb4!
Qxb4 29 Qe6+ Ke8 30 Bg6+ Kf8 31 Qf7 mate.
Game 58
L.Aronian-R.Rapport
Wijk aan Zee 2017
1 d4 Nf6 2 c4 e6 3 Nf3 b6 4 g3 Bb7 5 Bg2 Be7 6 0-0 0-0 7 Nc3 Ne4 8 Bd2
Bf6
A typical Queen’s Indian set-up with Black delaying the advance of his
centre pawns in favour of controlling the key e4-square with his bishop on
b7.
9 Be1
The quiet nature of this move might have made Rapport careless. After
all, putting a bishop on e1 isn’t normally the prelude to a crushing attack.
9 ... Re8?
It’s hard to fathom the purpose of this very mysterious rook move.
Instead, 9 ... Nxc3 10 Bxc3 Be4 (not wanting to be shut in after the next
move) and then 11 ... d5 fights for the centre.
10 Qc2 d5?
A serious mistake, as the resulting opening of the d-file proves very
unfavourable for Black. He had to make do with 10 ... Nxc3 11 Bxc3, though
11 ... d6 12 Rad1 and 13 e4 leaves White with a pleasant space advantage,
while 11 ... d5 12 cxd5 exd5 13 b4 gives White pressure down the c-file.
11 Nxe4 dxe4 12 Nd2
Now Black has no choice but to take on d4 or he will be a pawn down
once e4 falls.
12 ... Bxd4 13 Rd1
The e4-pawn can’t run away as b7 would drop. After the immediate 13
Nxe4 Black could try to wriggle out with 13 ... Nc6 14 Rd1 Qe7. With the
game move Aronian keeps the option of answering 13 ... Nc6 with 14 Bxe4,
with ideas of Bxh7+ as well as Nf3 and Bxc6 to embarrass the bishop on d4.
In any case the rook move has the desired effect as the black queen goes to c8
(rather than e7) and cedes the g5-square to the white knight.
13 ... Qc8 14 Nxe4 Bc5
Answer: 15 Ng5!
Aiming at h7. We are told if you see a good move, look for a better one.
We might add:
If you see a good plan, look for a better one!
After 15 Nxc5 Bxg2 16 Kxg2 bxc5 17 Bc3 White can add the superior
minor piece and control of the d-file to his structural advantage. If you are a
steady positional player who dislikes making sacrifices then I can understand
why you’d prefer to play like this. The doubled pawns on c7 and c5 aren’t
going to vanish in a hurry, whereas an attack on the king can disappear after
one or two suboptimum moves.
But in my opinion you shouldn’t shun a big opportunity just because it
isn’t your type of chess. I’m not saying that you should play sharp openings
and seek tactics if you are happier with a quiet strategic approach. But when a
chance to exert powerful dynamic pressure appears in the course of your
solid openings, you should seize it.
Here, for example, Aronian has played a slow, positional opening but is
quite ready to switch to tactics. A move like 9 Be1 is as slow and unobtrusive
as it gets, but leads to violence after Rapport’s rather careless response.
Therefore the knight heads for g5 as the prelude to an attack on the black
king.
15 ... f5 16 Bxb7 Qxb7 17 Bc3
First of all, provoking 15 ... f5 with the knight has weakened the e6-pawn.
Then, by exchanging on b7, White has driven the black queen away from the
defence of d7 and e6. Finally, the bishop has aimed itself at g7.
All these measures focus on obstructing the development of the black
knight. Thus, with the queen gone from c8, 17 ... Nd7 is ruled out. Or if 17 ...
Nc6 then 18 Rd7 attacks g7 (thanks to the bishop) and 18 ... Re7 in response
drops a pawn (thanks to the knight) due to 19 Rxe7 Nxe7 20 Nxe6.
Not only is Black unable to bring his knight out to a decent square, his
rook on a8 has to stay in the corner as well. The upshot is that Black is
seriously outgunned in the balance of forces in the centre and on the kingside.
But such advantages tend to evaporate over time, so Aronian is obliged to
attack as quickly and violently as possible.
17 ... Bf8
Defending g7 and, I expect, preparing a sequence such as 18 ... c5, 19 ...
Nc6 and 20 ... Rad8 to complete his development (he can answer 21 Rxd8
with 21 ... Nxd8 to keep e6 guarded). Aronian gives him no time for any of
that.
18 e4!
A lead in development needs open lines. The f5-pawn provides a hook
onto which White can latch his attack.
18 ... h6 19 exf5! hxg5 20 f6
Question: How would you sum up White’s compensation for the piece?
Answer: In return for the piece White has a powerful pawn supported by
the bishop. His queen has an open diagonal and is ready to go to g6,
threatening the rook on e8 as well as mate with f6-f7+ followed by a queen
check on the h-file. Or White might choose to play 21 fxg7 and only then
Qg6.
20 ... c5
Allowing the queen to defend along the second rank. For instance, 21
Qg6 would now be rebuffed by 21 ... Qf7!.
21 f4!
Here we see another point of the piece sacrifice. White is able to bring his
reserve pieces into the attack faster than Black can reinforce the kingside’s
defences. Once White has wrenched open the f-file, he has two rooks, a
queen and a bishop besieging the black king, to say nothing of the rampant
pawn on f6. Meanwhile, Black still has a knight and a rook dozing on the
queenside. So, despite being nominally a piece down, White actually has
more pieces where it matters.
21 ... g4
A despairing attempt to keep things blocked up.
22 f5 gxf6 23 fxe6 Qh7
To meet the threat of 24 Qg6+ which would have won a rook. Note that
23 ... Nc6 would have lost at once to 24 Rd7.
24 Qg2!
The threat to slay the sleeping rook on a8 obliges the black knight to
abandon the defence of the d7-square.
24 ... Na6 25 Rd7 Qh5 26 Rxf6
Now both rooks crash through,
26 ... Rad8
Too late! Too late!
Question: Can you see the tactical finish to the attack?
Game 59
B.Lalic-M.Vicas
Dublin 2019
1 d4 Nf6 2 c4 e6 3 Nc3 d5 4 cxd5 exd5 5 Bg5 Be7 6 e3 c6 7 Bd3 0-0 8 Qc2
h6 9 Bf4 Bd6 10 Nge2
Question: Lalic now decides to bring a second rook over to the kingside,
leaving the other on the h-file, so that they are both ready to support an
advance with h3-h4 and g4-g5. Do you see any drawbacks to this plan?
15 Rdg1?
Answer: It is very hard to checkmate in the middlegame, especially if you
are playing an opponent who develops his pieces quickly, doesn’t neglect the
centre, and takes no great risks with his king. You need as much fire-power
as possible to help you break down resistance. With this in mind Lalic
shuffles his rook from d1 to g1.
However, there is a well-known maxim that for a wing attack to succeed
you need superiority in the centre. A proviso needs to be added that if the
central pawn structure is blocked, or at least fixed with the opponent having
no good way to disturb the equilibrium, then you don’t necessarily need
superiority there. It’s good enough to have a solid standing in the centre and
be left undisturbed there while you carry out your attack.
As we shall see, White has neither superiority nor a secure centre
position. For this reason the queen’s rook needed to remain on d1 to help
fight Black’s counterattack.
White’s decision can be classed under neglect of the centre (an unjustified
decentralization) or – if we accept that 15 Rhg1 was the correct move – the
wrong rook. When a player has connected rooks (usually on the first rank) he
has to decide where he should deploy them for maximum value. Even great
players have made mistakes, such as (after castling kingside) moving the
rook from f1 to centralize it on e1, when the rook should have remained on f1
to support kingside action, and so Rae1 should have been preferred. The term
“wrong rook” is often a useful shorthand for “White (or Black) is beginning
an attack on the wrong side of the board”.
After having seen how the position plays out over the next few moves,
we’ll return to see how things would have been different after 15 Rhg1.
15 ... b4 16 Na4 Ne4
Preparing a pawn sacrifice to fight for the initiative. It wasn’t necessary,
as the immediate 16 ... Ba6 looks okay for Black; e.g. 17 Bxa6 Rxa6 18 g5
hxg5 19 Rxg5 Ne4 20 Rg2 c5! 21 Rhg1 g6, when after 22 f3? Rc6! the threat
of 23 ... cxd4 gives Black a good game.
17 Ng3 Ba6!? 18 Bxe4
If 18 Nxe4 dxe4 19 Bxe4, Black should try 19 ... Bb5!?, threatening to
win a piece with 20 ... Bxa4, as after 19 ... Rac8 White can change his mind
with 20 Rd1!.
18 ... dxe4 19 Nxe4 Qd5
The point of Black’s combination is that a2 and e4 are both hanging.
20 Nec5 Nxc5 21 Nxc5
Question: Should Black play 21 ... Qxa2 to infiltrate with his queen and
get
a pawn back?
21 ... a4!
An excellent decision. Vicas is prepared to make further pawn offers to
keep up the momentum of his attack.
Answer: 21 ... Qxa2? would not be in the spirit of the position. After 22
b3! Qxc2+ (instead, 22 ... Qa3+ 23 Kd2 leaves Black with no good answer to
the threat of 24 Ra1, trapping the queen) 23 Kxc2 Black has been forced into
a bad endgame – his pawns on a5 and c6 make a terrible impression
compared with White’s sleek mass of centre and kingside pawns and,
besides, the knight is very strong on c5.
It should also be mentioned that White is a veteran grandmaster while
Black was a young and upcoming player rated 2194 Elo at the time. Lalic
would have loved the chance to grind his opponent down in an endgame even
half as favourable as that after 23 Kxc2, rather than be embroiled in a
middlegame mêlée. Of course this begs the question of why White played so
aggressively in the opening rather than steering the game along positional
channels. Perhaps he underestimated his opponent and thought he would cave
in quickly when faced by an attack. He couldn’t have guessed that he was
going to find such great moves.
22 Nxa4
If he doesn’t take the pawn then 22 ... b3 will ram his queenside. It looks
like the threat of a knight fork on b6 might give Black pause for thought, but:
22 ... c5!
A third pawn sacrifice to complete his plan of breaking open lines on the
queenside. Bogdan Lalic showed me this game before the start of a match in
which we were playing for Wood Green (a team that, due to the efforts of our
captain Brian Smith, has won the London League Championship 17 years in
a row). He told me had hoped for 22 ... Bd3 23 Qxd3 Rxa4, when he regains
the initiative from Black with 24 Qb3 Qa5 25 g5! (it’s White’s turn to make
some line-clearing sacrifices) 25 ... hxg5 26 h4! gxh4 27 Rxh4 Rxa2 28 Kd2!
Ra1 29 Rg2! and White’s attack is the stronger – he threatens to double rooks
on the h-file or g-file (note that after Rhg4 Black can’t defend with ... g7-g6
as Rxg6+ follows, due to the pin on f7).
23 Nxc5
If 23 Nb6 then 23 ... Qxa2 24 Nxa8 cxd4 25 Nc7 d3 26 Qb1 Qc4+ 27
Kd2 Qxc7 and Black has a decisive initiative. One plan would be to
manoeuvre his queen to f6 via c6 to attack f2 and threaten to infiltrate via f3
into e2. This can be combined with ... Rc8, intending ... Rc2+ once the white
rooks have been tied down by the black queen.
23 ... Rec8
Threatening 24 ... Rxc5! 25 dxc5 Qxa2, intending the deadly 26 ... b3 27
Qb1 Qa4 followed by a killer check on c4.
24 Rd1
The rook is recalled to the defence of the centre, having achieved nothing
on the g-file. If 24 Kb1 then 24 ... Bb5! (threatening a2) 25 b3 Rxc5! 26
Qxc5 (after 26 dxc5 Bd3 the queen is lost) 26 ... Bd3+ 27 Kc1 Qf3 28 Rd1
Bg6, intending 29 ... Rxa2, gives Black a decisive attack (note that 29 Rd2
drops the rook on h1), while 27 Kb2 allows an unexpected mate: 27 ...
Rxa2+! 28 Kxa2 (or 28 Kc1 Qxb3 mates) 28 ... Qa8+ 29 Kb2 Qa3 mate.
It stands to reason that in the complications discussed above and on
previous moves keeping the rook on d1 (rather than 15 Rdg1) would have
aided White considerably: the fact that the rook is now compelled to return to
d1 shows that White in effect lost two tempi by decentralizing it on g1. If the
rook had stayed on d1, and 15 Rhg1 been played instead, we would have had
to re-evaluate the worth of Black’s plan with 16 ... Ne4. For example,
imagine one white rook is on d1 and the other on g1, and the line above with
24 Kb1 Bb5 25 b3 Rxc5 had occurred. White can then reply 26 dxc5 because
with the rook on d1 he doesn’t lose his queen to 26 ... Bd3. This line
therefore ends not in a clever mate by Black but in a trivial win for White.
Black would have to try another sequence of moves after 15 Rhg1 to get
his attack going, but it would be by no means as easy.
24 ... Qxa2
After 24 ... Rxc5 25 dxc5 Qxa2 26 Qe4!, attacking a8, White comes out
on top.
25 b3!
The only way to stay alive. Black has nothing better than to force a draw
by repetition with a final sacrifice.
Question: Can you work out his combination?
Game 60
I.Nepomniachtchi-S.Karjakin
Grand Chess Tour, Zagreb 2019
17 Qe3
When facing an attack less experienced players often get scared and want
to exchange off queens no matter what. In contrast, a strong player would
rather take his or her chance against the attack than defend a miserable
endgame of the kind reached after 17 Qg3 Qxg3 18 fxg3 Nxa7, when Black
would continue 19 ... Ke7 and 20 ... Rag8 to beleaguer the pawn on g3.
There’s more likelihood of an experienced opponent messing up in a complex
middlegame than in a simplified endgame. Besides, there’s always the
cheering thought that you might even win if he goes wrong, whereas in the
endgame you’re just holding on for a draw.
17 ... Nxa7 18 Nd2 Nc6 19 g3 Qh3 20 Bd1 Bxd1
Despite what we said in the last note Nepo still seeks safety in exchanges,
as long as he doesn’t compromise his position too much in arranging them.
21 Raxd1 0-0-0 22 Qf3 Rh8 23 Nf1
Things might not took too bad for White, but the second wave of Black’s
kingside pawn storm is about to break.
23 ... h5 24 Ne3 h4
Question: Can you give a reason why 24 ... Ne7 would be a superior
decision?
As a positional and tactical exercise you might like to consider how Black
should then meet the moves 25 Nf5 and 25 Qf6. We shall discuss 24 ...
Ne7
below after looking at the rest of the game.
Nonetheless, the game move looks like a powerful lever to open the h-file
and put pressure on g3. It seems that the white position is about to collapse;
for example, 25 Nf5 Rgh7 leaves him facing a strong attack which can be
strengthened by the manoeuvre ... Nd8-e6-g5, driving the white queen from
her vital defensive post on f3. Then 26 Nxh4 fails to 26 ... Rxh4, while if 26
Qg2 hxg3 the recapture 27 Nxg3 allows 27 ... Qg4!, declining the exchange
of queens to keep up an overwhelming attack; otherwise, Black is prepared to
exchange queens to win a pawn in the event of 27 Qxh3 gxf2+ 28 Kxf2 Rxh3
or 27 fxg3 Qxg2+ 28 Kxg2 Rh2+ 29 Kf3 Rxb2.
Notice how Black is more than happy to give up his attack to win a pawn
in these lines. Sometimes an attack is an adventure that can only be justified
if you bring back the head of the opponent’s king. You’ve sacrificed material
or made a major concession which means there is no way to return to normal
positional play. You have to do or die. But there are a lot of occasions when
you can happily give up your attack for a humbler, but still decisive prize.
Here the pawn on b2 was minding its own business but turned out to be the
crowning point of Black’s strategy after 29 ... Rxb2 in the line above.
An initiative can evaporate for no clear reason, whereas a material
advantage is forever (or at least seems like forever to the poor guy defending
a long endgame, which is another psychological reason for going for
material). Be flexible in your thinking. Keep an open mind and don’t go nuts
in chasing the mirage of a checkmate when there is a good, healthy, real
pawn to feast on.
None of the above happened in the game. Nepo held it together very
easily by getting the queens off.
25 Qf5+! Qxf5 26 Nxf5
Besides defending g3, the knight attacks g7 which gains another move for
the defence.
26 ... Rg5 27 Re3!
A good swap: White prepares to exchange off the active black rook on g5
for a rook that was doing nothing on e1.
27 ... Kd7
Not 27 ... Rgh5? 28 Nxh4, while 27 ... h3 28 Kh2 leaves the advanced
pawn as a liability, perhaps doomed to death.
28 Kg2
The final consolidating move. Black has to liquidate or else 29 Rh1 will
capture the h-pawn. The rest was uneventful:
28 ... hxg3 29 Rxg3 Rxg3+ 30 Kxg3 Ne7 31 Nxe7 Kxe7 32 Kf3 Rh3+
33 Kg2 Rh8 34 Kf3 Rh3+ 35 Kg2 Rh8 ½-½
Answer: We should return to the critical moment in the game and see if
Black could have done better with 24 ... Ne7.
This rules out the immediate queen exchange, while after 25 Nf5 Black
can again renounce the attack in favour of eventually winning a pawn: 25 ...
Nxf5 26 Qxf5+ Qxf5 27 exf5 h4 (loosening up White’s kingside before going
after the real target on f5) 28 Kg2 hxg3 29 fxg3 Rg5 30 Rf1 Rhh5. The f5-
pawn is going to fall. If it advances to f6 Black could put his king on e6 to
help the rooks round it up with, say, ... Rh6 and ... Rgg6.
In the game Nepo got to exchange queens at no cost, whereas in this line
White secured his king from attack but is left with a pawn on f5 which can’t
be held.
The alternative 25 Qf6 looks awkward for Black as both his knight and
g7-rook are hanging. But the direct attack on the king proves strong after 25
... Rhg8! 26 Ng2 (taking the knight allows a forced mate: 26 Qxe7? Rxg3+
27 fxg3 Qxg3+ 28 Kf1 Qf3 mate or 28 Kh1 Qh3 mate) 26 ... Rg5! (to play
his next move without allowing White to take on h4 with the queen, though
26 ... h4 27 Qxh4 Qe6 also looks menacing for the white king) 27 Qxe7 (or
27 d4 h4, keeping up the attack) 27 ... h4.
It might not seem obvious at first glance but there is no way for White to
hold his kingside together. For example:
a) 28 Re3 hxg3 29 Rxg3 Rxg3 30 fxg3 Qxg3 31 Rd2 Qe1+ wins the rook
with a quick mate.
b) 28 Rd2 hxg3 29 fxg3 Rxg3 30 Ree2 Rh8 and there is no good way to
stop 31 ... Qh1+ 32 Kf2 Rxg2+ 33 Ke3 Rh3 mate.
c) 28 Qxf7 hxg3 and White can’t keep the g-file closed, as 29 f3 Qh2+ 30
Kf1 Qh1+ 31 Ke2 Qxg2+ 32 Ke3 Qf2 is mate.
Chapter Nine
Sacrificing to Gain the Initiative
Here we are concerned with investing material in order to force the opponent
onto the back foot: he is compelled to respond to our manoeuvres and threats,
rather than indulge in plans of his own. The focus is on sacrifices which
create attacking chances against the enemy king, so there will be some
overlap with the procedures outlined in Chapter Eight.
All-out Attack
In his manual Chess Fundamentals Capablanca makes the point that if you
start an all-out attack on the king with sacrifices it has to be carried through
to victory – you can’t break it off halfway through or you will lose. Of course
the need to mate isn’t quite as mandatory as Capa suggests: we could imagine
discontinuing an attack if the opportunity arose to recoup any material
invested and exchange into a good endgame. In such a scenario we might
even say that reaching a good endgame completed the attack.
But Capa is certainly right to warn us against attacking in a half-hearted
or haphazard manner. If we launch a committal attack and it doesn’t hit
home, we are likely to be left with disorganized pieces which can’t hold on to
key points in the face of the opponent’s counterattack. Even if we haven’t
sacrificed any material we might find ourselves positionally lost.
Game 61
D.Paravyan-S.Golubov
Korchnoi Memorial, St. Petersburg 2018
Black still looks okay after 14 ... Nd5. A pawn on its starting square
whose capture leads to trouble is often referred to as a poisoned pawn. The
great Bobby Fischer lost two games by grabbing a poisoned pawn in his 1972
match with Spassky: with the infamous 29 ... Bxh2? in game one, and then in
game eleven in the Poisoned Pawn Variation of the Sicilian Najdorf: 1 e4 c5
2 Nf3 d6 3 d4 cxd4 4 Nxd4 Nf6 5 Nc3 a6 6 Bg5 e6 7 f4 Qb6 8 Qd2 Qxb2 (he
didn’t respond well to 9 Nb3!? rather than the usual 9 Rb1) Apart from these
poisoned pawn and Poisoned Pawn mishaps, and a game lost by default,
everything in the match went splendidly for Fischer.
Why then do players still insist on take these venomous pawns? Perhaps
it is because they know that – in games that don’t make it into books – greed
often triumphs.
15 Rab1 Qa3 16 Qc2 Nd5?
Allowing White to begin a glorious combination. Instead, 16 ... b5 17
Bb3 Qa6 stops the black queen becoming a target (though there’s nothing
pretty about having your most powerful piece stuck on a6). If then 18 Ne5
Be6, White has the initiative but Black can still hope to defend soundly.
After the game move White is able to target both the black queen and
king. If he could only attack the king, or only harass the queen, Black would
be able to defend against the threats and wriggle out. But as we shall see, he
isn’t able to deal with the double whammy of threats to his two tallest pieces.
17 Rb3
The third rank is the route by which the rook can travel to the kingside.
17 ... Qa4 18 Bxd5! cxd5
Everything else being equal, the exchange of bishop for knight looks a
poor deal for White. Perhaps this is why Golubov underestimated the danger.
In this specific case Paravyan is removing a key piece opposing his kingside
assault.
19 Ng5
The attack begins in earnest with a good old-fashioned threat of mate.
19 ... g6
Black has an extra pawn and the bishop pair. He is also poised to develop
with 20 ... Bf5, putting the bishop on an excellent square with gain of time.
Materially and positionally White is busted unless his attack breaks through
and wins. The dynamic power which makes the attack possible is going to
evaporate quickly if he doesn’t do something fast: Black needs only to
complete his development with the aforementioned 20 ... Bf5 and then
centralize his rooks.
Question: Can you see the first of White’s sacrifices? Remember, we are
trying to combine threats to the black king and queen.
Answer: 20 Nxh7!
As you will see, Paravyan’s attack is by no means easy to carry out. That
was why Golubov was seduced into thinking he would be able to brush it off.
We should mention that White would also have had a decisive attack after
19 ... f5 20 Nxh7! Rf7 21 Qd1! etc.
20 ... Bf5
After 20 ... Kxh7 21 Rh3+ Bxh3 22 Qxa4 Black doesn’t have enough for
the queen.
21 Nf6+ Kg7
With his queen and knight both hanging it seems as if White has overshot
his bolt, but now another piece joins in the attack.
Question: How do we continue to drive the black king out into the open?
Question: If you see the next move then you have really taken the chapter
on using a pawn as a battering ram to heart!
Answer: 23 g4!!
In fact 23 Qd2 was also strong, when Black would have to answer 23 ...
Be4. However, the splendid game move is not only objectively best but also
gives me an opportunity to repeat advice close to my heart: don’t forget to
use your pawns as part of a plan.
23 ... Bf4
If 23 ... Bxc2, White loses (e.g. 24 g5+? Kf5) unless he plays the one
move that wins: 24 Rf3+, when 24 ... Bf5 25 g5 is mate.
Or 23 ... Be4 24 Rxe4! (winning the queen with 24 Rf3+ Ke7 25 Qxa4
isn’t bad either, and 24 ... Bxf3 25 g5 is mate) 24 ... dxe4 25 Qxe4 leaves
Black defenceless against the twin threats of 26 g5 mate and 26 Rf3+. For
example: 25 ... g5 26 Qe5+ Kg6 27 Qg7 mate.
After the game move it seems like Black is going to escape. If 24 Bxf4
Black can at last safely play 24 ... Bxc2 and win. But Paravyan has yet one
more surprise up his sleeve.
Question: Now think about how you can overload the bishop on f4 which
has to guard against mate on g5.
Answer: 24 Qc7!!
Threatening mate on e7 and ready to answer 24 ... Bxc7 with the familiar
25 g5 mate. I wonder if White enjoyed making this move during the game or
if he was too caught up in calculating and the general stress of play to
appreciate its beauty.
24 ... Bxh6 25 Qe5+
Only here. 25 Qe7+? would be a tragic mistake as the black king escapes
back to g7.
25 ... Kg5 26 h4+
Let’s forgive Paravyan that 26 Rg3! was a faster mate.
26 ... Kxh4
Or 26 ... Kxg4 27 Rg3+ Kh5 28 Qe2+ Kxh4 29 Kg2 (apparently, 29 Qf3
mates one move faster, but clearing the path for a rook check on h1 is the
‘human’ way) 29 ... Qd7 (or 29 ... Be4+ 30 Qxe4+ dxe4 31 Rh1 mate) 30
Rh1+ Bh3+ 31 Rhxh3+ Qxh3+ 32 Rxh3+ Kg5 33 Rg3+ Kf4 34 Qg4 mate.
27 Rh3+! Kg5
Or 27 ... Kxh3 28 Qg3 mate.
Question: Now what is the quickest win?
Game 62
L.Aronian-Ma.Carlsen
Stavanger 2017
Answer: White has cut off the retreat of the black queen. It’s time to take
stock. Assuming she can’t actually be captured by force (and she is indeed
safe with best play), what has White gained by sacrificing the exchange and a
pawn? Black’s kingside, queenside and centre remain rock solid. The only
way they will fall into danger is if Carlsen plays some outrageously anti-
positional moves, the sort of thing he might have done when he was seven
years old. And no player rated over 2800 will ever do that, even in a bullet
(one minute) game. Right?
Ah, but in this position Carlsen’s queen is being held to ransom. The
price for her release is a couple of terrible moves which open lines to the
benefit of the white pieces on both the queenside and kingside. In other
words Carlsen is obliged to play stupidly.
13 ... b6
If 13 ... Qa5? 14 Nxd5, Black has lost an important centre pawn without
achieving any freedom for his queen.
14 b4 Ne4
Here is the stupid move: Black gives up a pawn and exposes both his king
and c6 to danger. But the binds around the queen had to be loosened
somehow.
15 Nxe4 dxe4 16 Bxe4 Rb8
Question: Is there a way to disturb the black king? Can you calculate
the variations?
With 16 ... Nf6 Carlsen could put a stop to the coming attack against his
king. Of course he is more than familiar with the Greek Gift sacrifice. But
after 17 Bxc6 Rb8 18 Ne5 the black queen is still surrounded. And what’s
more, White would have a tremendous pawn on c5. Carlsen decides it is
better to put his king in peril than collapse on the queenside.
You can see the power of alternating threats to two points. Carlsen would
have effortlessly swatted off the danger to his king or the c6-point. But he
can’t do both at the same time.
With 16 ... Rb8, Black now has counterplay after 17 Bxc6 a5. Instead,
there came:
Answer: 17 Bxh7+! Kxh7 18 Ng5+ Kg8
After 18 ... Kg6 19 Qg4 f5 20 Qg3 the black king is for the chop.
19 Qh5 Nf6
This is an unusual form of the Greek Gift, as Black has a knight available
to guard the h7-square. Therefore his king is safer than usual. However,
Aronian has seen that his queen’s entrance on f7 will pick up material while
keeping up the initiative.
20 Qxf7+ Kh8
Question: Can you see the clever move Aronian had prepared when he
made the sacrifice on h7?
Answer: 21 Qc7!
Another form of alternation. Black can defend both rooks from the white
queen, but not at the same time deal with the knight swooping into f7.
21 ... Bd7 22 Nf7+ Kh7 23 Nxd8
It looks like it’s all over, but Carlsen is able to keep the fight alive by
winning the knight.
23 ... Rc8 24 Qxb6 Nd5
Crowding out the white queen from the defence of d8.
25 Qa7 Rxd8
It looks at first glance that Black has survived, as the material balance is
not bad: three white pawns for the black knight. But now begins the next
wave of White’s attack.
26 e4! Qd3
26 ... Nf6 27 Bg5, threatening both 28 e5 and 28 Bxf6 gxf6 29 Qc7, looks
gruesome for Black.
27 exd5 Qxd2 28 Qc7 Qg5 29 dxc6 Bc8
The material balance has changed again: now White has four pawns in
return for a bishop which has no safe moves.
30 h3
Stopping any back rank mate and so freeing his rook to become active on
the third rank.
30 ... Qd5
Of course 30 ... Rxd4 31 Qxc8 wins.
31 Rd1 e5?
We’ve been lauding Aronian for the energy and invention of his attacking
play. But the world champion also deserves a lot of credit. Considering he
was taken by surprise in the opening and had to find his way through a mass
of complications, Carlsen has actually defended superbly up until this point.
Only now, when it seems that Black might finally be co-ordinating his pieces
and getting some counterplay, does he falter. Instead, 31 ... Rf8 32 f3 Qb3
gives Black enough activity to equalize chances.
32 Rd3!
Aronian has calculated that the entrance of his rook will be decisive.
32 ... exd4 33 Qe7!
Precisely does it. After 33 Rg3 Black can defend with 33 ... Rg8, when 34
Qe7? Qxc6 35 Qh4+ Qh6 defends. White should still win with the superior
34 Qd6! Qxd6 35 cxd6, but it would be more laborious.
33 ... Bf5
Now 33 ... Rg8 34 Qh4+ Kg6 35 Rxd4 wins. Black can’t even play 35 ...
Qxc6 because of 36 Rd6+.
34 Rg3 Bg6
It’s mate in one after 34 ... Rg8.
35 Qh4+ 1-0
After 35 ... Kg8 36 Rxg6 Black can’t even fight on with 36 ... d3 as 37
Qf6 is immediately decisive.
Game 63
A.Grischuk-And.Volokitin
Baku Olympiad 2016
14 Bxd7 Qh5!
Answer: This is Black’s idea. Besides the direct threat to f3, two other
tactical features give Black a stronger initiative than is apparent. Firstly, the
plight of the white bishop on d7. As things stand, when it is attacked by a
black rook, it will have no safe retreat squares. Furthermore, as we shall see
in the note to the next move, in a critical line attacking the bishop will be a
way to ferry a rook into the attack on f3 with gain of time.
The second tactical resource for Black is the pawn on c4. It didn’t just
clear the way for the queen to h5, it is also ready to support the move ... Bd3
should the bishop need a safe square or Black wish to regain the exchange
with a subsequent ... Bxf1.
15 g4!
A clumsy-looking move, but he must break the pin on f3.
Answer: 16 Ne1!
Of course 16 Ng5 allows mate in one, while 16 Bxe8 Qxg4+ is also lethal
to the white king. Grischuk finds the only move, saving his knight, guarding
g2, and taking some of the sting out of Black’s next move.
16 ... Bd3!
Black has to carry on dynamically. 16 ... Red8? 17 bxc4 Rxd7 18 f3
leaves him with a lost position.
17 Nxd3 cxd3 18 Qxd3 Rad8! 19 Bxc6!
Selling the bishop’s life as dearly as possible. After 19 Bxe8 Black can
(and must) force perpetual with 19 ... Qxg4+ 20 Kh1 Qf3+, leaving honours
equal between attack and defence.
19 ... bxc6
Of course not 19 ... Qxg4+?? 20 Bg2.
20 Qe4
The queen defends g4 and gets out of the way of a pin on the d-file.
Grischuk still has an extra pawn, but it isn’t easy to hold everything together.
20 ... c5
Over the next few moves Black’s initiative is aimed at wearing down
White’s pawn structure in the centre and on the kingside. As we shall see, the
looseness of the white king’s defences aids this plan.
21 Rad1 h5 22 gxh5 Qxh5 23 f4?
This and his next move cost Grischuk the game. Instead, 23 f3! would
keep the black queen out, though Black has ample compensation for the pawn
after 23 ... Rd6 etc.
23 ... Qe2!
There is a Russian saying that “one man in a field isn’t an army”. Clearly
they never met a lady like Black’s queen on e2. She not only hits the bishop
but also creates a pin on the e3-pawn. There is no good way to evict her as 24
Rf2? drops the rook on d1 and 24 Qg2 loses the e3-pawn.
24 Ba1?
My computer suggests rather desperate measures to evict the black queen:
24 Bc1! cxd4 25 Rd2, when 25 ... Qxe3+ 26 Qxe3 dxe3 27 Rxd8 Rxd8 28.
Bxe3 leads to a fairly equal endgame, while 25 ... Qa6 26 exd4 e6 gives
Black good play for the pawn but no more than that.
24 ... cxd4 25 Rde1
Grischuk may have overlooked that after 25 Bxd4 Bxd4 26 Rxd4 Rxd4
27 Qxd4 Black has 27 ... Rc8!, threatening to win at once with 28 ... Rc2,
mating the white king. After 28 Qd1 (what else?) 28 ... Qxe3+ White faces a
horrendous defence with broken pawns and an exposed king.
25 ... Qg4+ 26 Qg2
After 26 Kh1 d3 Black suddenly has a strong passed pawn. The exchange
of queens finally removes any danger to White’s king, but it leaves him in a
pawn down in the endgame.
26 ... Qxg2+ 27 Kxg2 dxe3 28 Re2
Or 28 Rxe3 Rd2+, winning the a2-pawn, as 29 Rf2? would drop the
bishop after 29 ... Rxf2+.
28 ... Bxa1 29 Rxa1 e5!
Ensuring White can’t regain his pawn.
30 fxe5 Rxe5 31 Rae1 Kg7 32 Kg3 Rde8
33 h3
After 33 Kf3 Black can arrange to swap his e3-pawn for the h2-pawn: 33
... Rh8 34 Kg3 Reh5! (planning 35 ... Rh3+ to win the h2-pawn) 35 Rxe3
Rxh2 and the kingside passed pawns will win the day for Black.
33 ... f5 34 Kf3 Rh8 35 Kg3 g5!
Now 36 Rxe3 would lose to a fork on f4.
36 Rh2 f4+ 37 Kf3 Kf6 38 Rc1 Kf5 0-1
One threat is 39 ... Rxh3+! 40 Rxh3 g4+ 41 Kg2 gxh3+ 42 Kxh3, when
the way is clear for Black to advance the passed pawns.
Game 64
W.So-D.Sadzikowski
Gibraltar 2019
Question: We have seen pawns rammed with great effect into the
enemy structure in the previous chapter. Can you see how Wesley So
used the chance of a positional sacrifice to neutralize the danger?
Answer: 16 Qxf3!
Only by sacrificing his queen will So be able to justify his play. After 16
g3 a6 17 Nc3 Qe8 and 18 ... Qh5 White’s king would be in great danger. 16
gxf3 Nh5 is also unsatisfactory for him, as Black can assail his weakened
defences with moves like ... Bg5 and ... Nf4.
16 ... Ng4 17 Qe4
The only way to curtail Black’s pressure against f2 is by threatening h7.
17 ... Bf5
Answer: 20 Nxd6!
A desperado sacrifice to destroy the base of Black’s centre before taking
the knight.
20 ... Qxd6 21 Bxg4 Qxd5
Sadzikowski must have hoped that freeing his queen from confinement
behind its own pawn structure and getting rid of the strong white pawn on d5
would benefit him. However, lines have also been opened for the white
pieces and two targets have become accessible to them: the pawn on e5 and –
even more seriously – the pawn on b7. So’s next two moves tie down black
pieces to their defence.
22 Bc3 Bf6 23 Bf3 Qb5
Question: What is wrong with the centralizing move 24 Rad1 here?
24 Re4!
A key moment. Putting the rook on e4 is vital prophylaxis (or preventive
play) against the advance of the black e-pawn.
Answer: It would be very easy to play the routine 24 Rad1?, which looks
great as it seizes the d-file. But then Black would have 24 ... e4!, which
allows him to exchange off his passive bishop for the white one guarding the
a5- and b2-pawns; i.e. 25 Bxe4 (25 Bxf6 exf3 26 Bc3 Re8 sees the black
pawn reincarnated on f3 to intimidate the white king) 25 ... Bxc3 26 bxc3
Qxa5 and White’s queenside is broken up.
In the game Black is unable to disrupt White’s rock-solid structure.
24 ... Rd8 25 g3
Making a hole for his king on g2 before pressing on with his winning
plan, which will focus on Black’s weakness on b7.
25 ... Qc5 26 Raa4!
The rook will infiltrate via the c4-square.
26 ... Rd7
After 26 ... Rc8 there is the trick 27 Rec4! (rather than 27 Rac4, when 27
... Qf8 resists) 27 ... Qxc4 (or 27 ... Qf8 28 Bxb7) 28 Rxc4 Rxc4 29 Bd5+
(the point) 29 ... Kf8 30 Bxc4, which is hopeless for Black.
27 Rac4 Qe7 28 Rc8+ Rd8
Black is pulverized after 28 ... Kf7 29 Bb4 Qe6 30 Bg4 Qd5 31 Re3, as
he loses the exchange to start with. But now the b7-pawn will drop sooner or
later.
29 Rec4 e4
This advance is too late to make any difference.
30 Bxe4 Bxc3 31 Rxc3
31 ... g6
If 31 ... Qxe4 then 32 Rxd8+ Kf7 33 Rc7+ carves Black up, while 31 ...
Rxc8 32 Bd5+! (a deadly zwischenzug which wins with a lot less effort than
32 Rxc8+ Kf7) 32 ... Kf8 33 Rxc8+ wins the black queen.
32 Bxb7!
The key pawn drops without Black even being able to liquidate the white
pawn on a5. The rest is simple for Wesley So.
32 ... Qe1+ 33 Kg2 Rxc8 34 Rxc8+ Kg7 35 c3 Qe2 36 b4 h5 37 Rc7+
Kh6 38 h4 g5 39 Bf3 Qb5 40 Rc5 1-0
To add to his woes on the queenside Black loses both his kingside pawns
after 41 Rxg5 and 42 Rxh5+.
Game 65
R.Robson-F.Caruana
US Championship, St. Louis 2018
Question: Can you work out the best reply to White’s move?
Question: You’ve got him tied up, but how do you continue to attack
White’s position?
The course of the game might suggest that Caruana was already planning an
onslaught against the white king when he played 13 ... Bf5. In fact his aims
were more modest: his bishop pair would give him enough dynamism to
counter any attempt by White to utilize his extra pawn. It was only when
White pressed forward that he decided to gamble on an attack on the king
with 27 ... b5.
Chapter Ten
Deciding the Character of the Game in the
Opening
It is now time to consider how the opening phase will determine the typical
plans we have seen in the middlegame.
At the start of a game White has a small but definite advantage by virtue
of having the right to move first. In most cases he seeks to seize territory in
the centre by advancing pawns there (beginning 1 d4 or 1 e4) and supporting
them with an efficient development of his pieces.
In general Black has two possible responses to this land grab. They are
very different in style and spirit and will shape the nature of the ensuing
struggle in the early middlegame, indeed perhaps for the whole game. It
might be said that in the opening phase solidity and activity are at the
opposite ends of a sliding scale.
Game 66
M.Vachier Lagrave-D.Navara
Biel 2018
1 e4 e5 2 Nf3
Instead, 2 f4 is the good old King’s Gambit, which looks for an
immediate and violent struggle. It might be said of all gambits after 1 e4 e5
that White is expecting too much too soon. He is in danger of handing over
the initiative to Black, or at least allowing the position to burn out too quickly
with advantage to neither player.
Such at least is an objective assessment. If you love gambit lines and
know them well, then feel free to ignore any doubters. Only reconsider your
approach if your results with your gambit lines start to dip or you feel
dissatisfied with the positions you are getting with them. In that case it might
be time to move on. But until then keep on winning your games against
unprepared opponents because you know the traps and middlegame schemes
better than they do.
2 ... Nc6 3 Bc4 Bc5 4 0-0 Nf6 5 d3 0-0 6 Re1 d6
14 ... Nh7?
Navara plays in the enterprising style which has brought him a rating well
over 2700. Here, however, the plan of putting the knight on g5 leads to
disaster. It might have worked against a lesser grandmaster, but it is playing
with fire against a superbrain like Vachier-Lagrave who loves to play
dynamically and make sacrifices. The solid move was 14 ... Re8, while 14 ...
b5 would be consistent with Black’s plan of advancing on the queenside.
15 Nf5
The knight takes up residence near the opponent’s defensive line. It
wasn’t too late for Black to play 15 ... Re8 with a defensible position, but as
we have already discussed in the notes to Nisipeanu-Radjabov in Chapter
Five: once you’ve said “A” you have to say “B”.
15 ... Ng5?
Black’s reasoning is as follows: “after the exchange on g5, I’ll be able to
play ... Nf4, putting my remaining knight on an excellent square defended by
both the e5- and g5-pawns. Then I can evict the white knight with ... g7-g6
and begin my own attack on White’s king.”
Optimism is a great quality for a chess player, but here Black has
overstepped the mark. Nevertheless, it will take some imaginative play by
MVL to show the fallacy of Black’s concept.
16 Nxg5 hxg5 17 Qh5!
White had to assess the impending knight offer before committing
himself to this queen foray.
17 ... Nf4 18 Bxf4 exf4
After 18 ... gxf4 19 dxe5 dxe5 20 Rad1 the pin on the d-file is fatal; e.g.
20 ... Qe8 21 Rxd7! Qxd7 22 Qg4 and the mate threat on g7 costs Black his
queen after 22 ... g6 23 Nh6+.
Question: Now what move adds oomph to the white attack?
Answer: 19 h4!
The following piece sacrifice energizes White’s kingside pawns and
enfeebles the black pawns by disrupting their defensive role.
19 ... g6
Now Black’s king will face a huge attack, but the endgame after 19 ...
gxh4 20 Nxh4 Qf6 21 e5 Qh6 22 Qxh6 gxh6 23 exd6 cxd6 24 Re7 Rfd8 25
Bf5 was very ugly for him.
20 Qh6 gxf5 21 exf5
Threatening to win at once with 22 f6, followed by mate on g7 or h7.
21 ... f6 22 Qg6+ Kh8 23 hxg5 Bc6
Clearing the d7-square to allow the queen to defend along the second
rank. Instead, after 23 ... Rg8 24 Qh6 we have an epaulette mate.
24 Rad1!
Calling up the reinforcements with a mighty rook manoeuvre via d3 to
h3. Note that White had the luxury of calling it a draw by perpetual check,
either here or on the previous move, if there was something he didn’t like
about the position. This means that, as regards any risk of losing, he didn’t
need to calculate beyond the 22nd move when he made the sacrifice. As a
rule, if your instinct tells you a sacrifice is good and you see there is at least a
forced draw after a few moves, and maybe more, don’t bother looking any
further down that variation. Save time and energy by crossing bridges when
you come to them.
24 ... Qd7 25 Rd3 Qg7 26 Rh3+ Kg8 27 Re7!!
A brilliant strengthening of the attack. Normally, the exchange of queens
weakens an attack, but here the black king will be at the mercy of White’s
rampaging rooks, strong pawn on g6, and bishop supporting things from a
distance.
Remember our previous comment: MVL didn’t have to see this
unexpected entrance by the rook way back on move 17. He only needed to
spot it before renouncing a draw by perpetual in favour of 24 Rad1.
27 ... Qxg6 28 fxg6 f5
Navara shuts the white bishop out as 28 ... Rae8 allows the pretty
combination 29 Rh8+! Kxh8 30 g7+ Kg8 31 Bh7+! Kxh7 32 gxf8Q+ and
White wins.
29 Rhh7 Rfe8 30 Reg7+ Kf8 31 Rxc7
Not so much to grab a pawn but to get the rook out of the range of offers
to exchange it, and with gain of time by threatening mate on h8.
31 ... Kg8 32 Bxf5
The bishop rejoins the action. White now has four pawns for the piece as
well as an irresistible attack.
32 ... Bb6 33 Rcg7+ Kf8 34 Rf7+ Kg8 35 d5!
Another vigorous pawn stab which wins the d7-square for his rook.
35 ... Bxd5
If 35 ... Bb5 then 36 Rfg7+ Kf8 37 Rxb7 is crushing for White.
36 Rfg7+ Kf8 37 Rd7 Kg8 38 g7
Threatening mate on h8.
38 ... Bf7 39 g6 1-0
Vachier-Lagrave made epic use of his pawns.
Game 67
V.Topalov-R.Wojtaszek
Shamkir 2018
1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 Bb5 a6 4 Ba4 Nf6 5 0-0 Bc5 6 c3 0-0 7 d4 Ba7 8 Re1?!
A natural move, but it seems that Topalov should play more aggressively
if he wishes to preserve his opening advantage. This could, for example, be
done with 8 Bg5 – the pin is somewhat awkward for Black with his bishop on
a7 rather than its more usual e7-square in the Ruy Lopez.
8 ... b5 9 Bb3 d6 10 h3 Bb7 11 a4
It wasn’t too late to try the pin with 11 Bg5, which would rule out Black’s
reply in the game as 12 Bxf6 gxf6 would leave him with a broken kingside.
11 ... Ne7! 12 Bc2 Ng6 13 Na3 c6 14 Bd3 Re8 15 Nc2 h6
So far the players have been concerned with developing their pieces,
building a solid centre, getting their kings to safety and avoiding structural
weaknesses. Notice how Black played 11 ... Ne7 and 12 ... Ng6 to redeploy
the knight to a good post on the kingside. At the same time he cleared the c6-
square so that, after White attacked the b5-pawn with 11 a4 and 13 Na3, his
queenside structure could stand its ground with 13 ... c6 rather than be broken
up.
At the moment the manoeuvre of the knight to g6 is a minor positional
achievement for Black, but it will become of decisive importance later in the
game.
16 dxe5?
Question: Why is this a poor decision, and how instead can White firm
up his centre?
White not only stops 29 ... c4 but also attempts to generate queenside
counterplay.
Question: Should you meet the attack on the b5-pawn by taking on c4,
blocking things up with 29 ... b4, or carrying on with your attack in the
centre?
Answer: A lot of good players would be satisfied to block the queenside
with 29 ... b4 (29 ... bxc4 30 Qxc4 gives White some undeserved freedom),
so that they can focus on exploiting their passed pawn. But a top player is
always looking for the most incisive moves. He won’t give his opponent the
slightest breathing space if he can help it. And so Wojtaszek ignores the
attack on b5 and, without wasting a tempo, seeks to exploit his initiative.
29 ... Re2! 30 cxb5 Qe5!
First of all, the rook goes to the seventh rank, and then the queen comes
up to support it.
31 Ra8+ Kh7 32 Qc4 Qxf5!
It is vital to combine mating threats to the white king with support of the
passed pawn. After 32 ... d2 33 Rd8! White suddenly has everything covered.
33 f3 Rc2!
Not just ignoring White’s threat to f7, actually forcing him to carry it out.
34 Qxf7 Qg5!
Game 68
Ma.Carlsen-E.Hossain
Baku Olympiad 2016
1 e3!?
Carlsen likes to try every opening at least once. Apparently, this is called
Van’t Kruijs’ Opening after a Dutch player who tried it against Anderssen in
1851. As we shall see, it soon transposes to more commonplace opening
territory.
1 ... Nf6 2 Nf3 e6 3 c4 b6 4 Nc3 Bb7 5 d4 Bb4 6 Bd3
Now we have the familiar shape of a Nimzo-Indian structure. Black is
willing to sacrifice the bishop pair in order to give his opponent doubled
pawns and increase his own influence over the key e4-square. We might say
that the Nimzo-Indian is a positionally complex opening and so a good
choice if you are looking to win with Black, even if it lacks some of the
tactical fire of the Indian defences (the King’s Indian, Benoni, etc) which are
based on a fianchetto on g7. Here Black isn’t usually looking for a
counterattack against the white king: his thoughts are on restraining and then
wearing down the white centre.
6 ... Ne4 7 0-0
Offering a gambit. After, say, 7 ... Nxc3 8 bxc3 Bxc3 9 Rb1 d6 10 Qc2
Ba5 11 e4 we have exactly what Black is trying to prevent in the Nimzo-
Indian: a mobile white centre which has overrun the e4-square and is difficult
to restrain.
7 ... Bxc3 8 bxc3 0-0 9 Ne1!
Preparing to dislodge the black knight from e4 without any more ado.
9 ... c5?
A serious mistake. The whole point of Black’s opening is to fight for the
e4-square. As we saw in the note to the 7th move, White is even willing to
sacrifice a pawn to get control of it, and yet here Black hands it over for free!
Answer: 18 cxd5? would keep White’s centre broad and mobile, but it
would release the stranglehold on the black pieces. With 18 ... c4! Hossain
would clear the c5-square for his knight. Then 19 Nxc4 Nxe4! breaks up the
white centre, while 19 Bb1 Rae8, intending ... Nc5, would besiege the e4-
pawn. White is no longer better after 18 cxd5?, whereas he is (strategically-
speaking) close to winning after 18 exd5!. If you want to master the art of
planning you have to handle your pawns well and avoid stereotyped
decisions.
In the game, Black has no freeing move on the queenside and there is no
white pawn on e4 to target.
18 ... Rfe8
Question: After White’s previous move you might be thinking “we no
longer
have a pawn on e4. So where is our pawn storm going to come from?”
Have a further think about it!
Answer: 19 g4!
Carlsen immediately provides an answer. If you have a commanding
initiative you can afford to push all the pawns in front of your king. Hossain
has no way to exploit the open spaces. His pieces are going to be pushed
back, leaving his own king in mortal danger. (Even if Black could start a fire,
Carlsen’s rook on a2 is a fire engine ready to trundle over to quell the
flames.)
19 ... Nf8 20 g5 N6d7
You can see how the black knights have been denied centre squares by
the white pawns on d5, f4 and g5. Meanwhile, Black’s bishop is staring at a
brick wall. It’s no wonder White’s initiative grows stronger and stronger.
21 h4 Rad8 22 h5 Bc8 23 Ng4 Re7 24 Rg2!
A breakthrough on the g-file begins to loom.
24 ... Kh8 25 Qf3 Rde8 26 Qg3 Rd8 27 Bd2 Rde8 28 f5!
Game 69
N.Radovanovic-Iv.Saric
European Championship, Skopje 2019
1 d4 Nf6 2 c4 e6 3 Nc3 Bb4 4 g3 0-0 5 Bg2
By avoiding Nf3 and making a quick fianchetto on the kingside White
obstructs the immediate ... b7-b6 and ... Bb7, which is the standard
development for Black in the Nimzo-Indian/Queen’s Indian complex. Players
who know everything about everything in the openings (e.g. Karjakin, So,
Anand, etc) are happy to play 5 ... d5 here, when 6 Nf3 dxc4 transposes into a
line of the Catalan where White has played an early Nc3, which is regarded
as slightly less promising than the main line where he can readily regain the
pawn on c4 with his queen. Thus the typical Catalan sequence is 1 d4 d5 2 c4
e6 3 Nf3 Nf6 4 g3 Be7 5 Bg2 0-0 6 0-0 dxc4 7 Qc2 a6 8 Qxc4 b5 9 Qc2 Bb7
10 Bd2 with an edge to White in an endlessly debated position.
It’s all well and good to play 5 ... d5 if you know something about the
Catalan, but what if you always play the Nimzo-Indian and don’t know
anything about 1 d4 d5 lines?
This encapsulates a frequent dilemma in the openings: should you play
the ‘best’ move even if it takes you away from your tried and tested opening
structure, or should you play something decent but suboptimal which keeps
you in more familiar territory. (Here’s another example: after 1 f4 I’ve a
feeling 1 ... e5 is the best response, but would you want to risk 2 e4 with the
King’s Gambit if you never answer 1 e4 with 1 ... e5 - ?)
During your opening preparation you need to take particular notice of
move orders which aim to trick you out of familiar lines. If you can find a
way to stay in familiar territory without compromising too much, then stick
to your guns. Otherwise you’ll have to learn a non-repertoire line specifically
for the rare occasions when you face a move order trick.
As we shall see, Saric has a line ready to keep it as a Nimzo-Indian.
5 ... Bxc3+
There is no point in delaying this exchange as White has no intention of
ever squandering a tempo provoking it with a2-a3.
6 bxc3 d6 7 Nf3 Nc6 8 Qd3
After 8 0-0 e5 Black gains space in the centre. The point of the rather
unusual game move is to answer 8 ... e5 with 9 Nd2, when White’s queen
remains guarding d4 and he has control over the e4-square.
8 ... Rb8!?
Saric avoids action in the centre in favour of a mysterious rook move on
the queenside.
9 Nd2 Na5 10 Nb3
Question: Can you see a creative way of answering this move?
Answer: Black has accepted doubled pawns in order to activate his rook
on b8 and give his bishop access to the a6- and b7-squares. The a5-pawn
might appear weak but it is difficult to strike at, whereas the c4-pawn is easy
to target with ... Ba6 and ... d6-d5. The contrasting health of the pawns on a5
and c4 illustrates the adage that a weakness is only a weakness if it can be
attacked.
We should also mention that Nimzowitsch would have applauded the idea
of ... Rb8 and ... Na5. Nowadays, the term “mysterious rook move” (which he
coined) tends to be used of any unusual or surprising move which puts a rook
on a blocked line. But Nimzowitsch meant more specifically placing the rook
on a blocked file to anticipate it being opened by the opponent, most usually
with an exchange of pawns. Here it was with the exchange of knights on a5.
12 c5!
Very sensibly getting rid of the weakling on c4 before 12 ... Ba6 can be
played. We’ve been applauding Black’s imaginative ideas, but the position is
no more than dynamically balanced, with White still retaining some of his
opening advantage. He has the bishop pair and an extra pawn in the centre (a
downside of Black allowing his b6-pawn to be deflected to a5).
12 ... dxc5 13 Ba3
The point of his previous move. White’s play hereabouts is excellent.
13 ... Bb7
14 e4!
Sacrificing a pawn to retain the bishop pair and keep up the pressure.
If 14 Bxb7 Rxb7 15 Bxc5, then 15 ... Qd5! is an important zwischenzug
attacking h1. There is a lovely variation if White tries to throw a spanner in
the works with 16 e4?, namely 16 ... Nxe4 17 Bxf8 Nxf2! 18 Kxf2 Rb2+ 19
Ke3 (to stop the mating attack White has to give up the queen with 19 Qe2,
but of course that is also losing) 19 ... Qg5+ 20 Kf3 Qf6+ 21 Kg4 h5+ 22
Kxh5 (or 22 Kh3 g5! and there’s no good way to stop 23 ... g4 mate) 22 ...
Qh6+ 23 Kg4 Rf2! 24 h4 f5+ 25 Kh3 g5!! 26 Bxh6 g4 mate! I should confess
that this is all courtesy of the genius of the Stockfish computer program.
After 15 ... Qd5 White should settle for 16 f3, though Black then has time
to double rooks on the b-file with 16 ... Rfb8, when his pieces are well
organized.
14 ... Nd7 15 0-0 Qc8
Clearing d8 for the rook and planning ... Ba6. Over the next two moves
Radovanovic prudently evacuates his queen and rook on f1 from the potential
firing line of the black bishop.
16 Rfe1 Rd8 17 Qc2 cxd4 18 cxd4 Nb6
Question: Would you choose safety with 19 Bc5 or adventure with 19
Bb2
if you had to decide?
19 Bb2
Answer: Here 19 Bc5, followed by 20 Rac1, looks a safe way to keep up
the pressure. Black has an extra pawn but his pieces, especially the queen,
remain boxed in. On the other hand, White is giving value to the black pieces
by launching an attack in their vicinity.
Instead, Radovanovic initiates the general scheme of Rac1, Ba1 (to get
the bishop out of the way of an attack by ... Na4 after his next move), Qc3
and d4-d5 to create threats against g7. This makes a lot of sense as he has a
powerful dark-squared bishop and Black’s kingside is lacking defenders – all
his pieces are bunched together on the other wing.
White’s plan is therefore strong but it has a practical drawback: it forces
him to play with great precision and vigour. Sometimes a higher-rated player
will create a tense situation, even if it is objectively unfavourable for him, in
the hope that the opponent will collapse under the pressure. Here Saric is
higher rated by 277 Elo points and evidently doesn’t want to draw, even with
Black. He has therefore tempted his opponent to avoid the safe and solid 19
Bc5 in favour of the more double-edged 19 Bb2. An elite player such as
Caruana would probably break through Saric’s defences and win in efficient
style, but it isn’t easy for lesser mortals.
If you reached the position after 18 ... Nb6, would you choose to
consolidate with 19 Bc5, giving you a risk-free edge, or play more boldly
with 19 Bb2, when you have more pressure but also more chance to be
outplayed? At such moments a number of factors – your style and
temperament, who you are playing, your tournament situation and how much
time you have on the clock – will form your decision.
19 ... Ba6
Black looks to gain counterplay through controlling the c4-square.
20 Rac1 Bc4 21 Ba1 a4
Instead, 21 ... c5!? is a non-human concept as it opens up lines for the
white pieces, but my computer says that Black is okay.
Question: White’s dynamism depends on advancing d4-d5 in a
favourable
manner. Can you see a quiet move which undermines the pawn barrier
Black has erected against it?
22 a3?
Just the type of slow, inconsequential move that Saric was hoping for.
White wants to play his next move without dropping the a2-pawn, but there
was no need to be so methodical.
Answer: Instead, 22 Bh3! would involve the hitherto passive bishop on
g2 in White’s build-up. It pins the e6-pawn and introduces the threat of a
breakthrough with 23 d5. After 22 ... c6 23 Qb2! (aiming for 24 d5), here are
some variations:
a) 23 ... f6 24 Qb4 Bxa2 25 d5!, when Black has no good way to take on
d5; e.g. 25 ... Nxd5 26 Qa3 Nb4 27 Bc3 and White will win the knight or
bishop.
b) 23 ... Nd5 24 Qd2 Nb6 (White has got his queen to a superior square
with gain of time, after which the central breakthrough is again killing) 25
d5! cxd5 26 Qd4 f6 27 exd5 Rxd5 (again Black has no adequate way to
recapture on d5) 28 Qf4 (eyeing the rook on b8) 28 ... Rc5 29 Bxe6+ Bxe6 30
Rxc5 Qxc5 31 Qxb8+ and White wins.
c) 23 ... Kh8 24 d5 Rg8 25 d6 is also pretty unpleasant for Black, but he
can continue to resist.
It’s not easy to notice the quiet move 22 Bh3 when all the attention has
been on the queenside, while 23 Qb2, putting the queen on a square where
she is exposed to a discovered attack, isn’t an obvious decision either. Still,
having asked yourself “how can I add power to the d4-d5 breakthrough?”, it
should be possible to find both moves. Of course the subsequent
complications aren’t simple to wade through, but White’s initiative flows
move by move once you have found the key moves to build it up.
22 ... Qd7 23 Qc3
Tartakower once described chess as “the tragedy of a single tempo”. After
23 Bh3 Qe7 the black queen has escaped from the pin, meaning that the e6-
pawn is a firm defender of the key d5-square again.
23 ... f6 24 Qa5 c6 25 Qc5 Bb5 26 e5?
Question: Why is this a shocking decision, positionally speaking, and
what is Black’s best reply?
White would be just about okay after 27 Bc3, pulling himself back from
the brink. But if you have spoilt your pawn structure with the sole intention
of capturing a pawn, how hard it is to then change your mind about grabbing
it!
27 ... Bxc6 28 Qxc6 Nd5
Answer: The exchange of bishops on c6 has left White grievously weak
on the light squares. In particular, it is disastrous for him that the black knight
can’t be moved from its blockade square on d5. This point is the natural
expansion square for the white pawn structure – see, for example, the
variations with an explosive d4-d5! advance given at move 22 above.
Nimzowitsch has observed that: It is an enigmatic fact that the blockade
square tends to become a strong point for yourself and a weak one for the
opponent. (Note that Nimzo is optimistically assuming we’d be Black in the
present scenario!)
In other words, once you’ve restrained the opponent’s pawn from making
its natural advance, the square it would have advanced to usually becomes a
useful post for your pieces. A wise comment, though I’m not sure why this
should be particularly mysterious.
In the game White has a useless bishop and a weak pawn on a3, in
addition to – or perhaps we should say because of – his light square woes.
The rest runs smoothly for Saric.
29 Qa6 Rb6 30 Qa5 Rb3 31 Rc4
After 31 Qc5 Rdb8 Black can gradually prepare a move like ... R8b5 to
dislodge the white queen from the defence of a3.
31 ... Rdb8
Or 31 ... Rxa3 at once.
32 Rec1 Rxa3 33 Bc3 Rab3 34 Bd2 a3
The white pieces are distracted by the need to hold back the advanced
passed pawn, which allows Saric to strike a deadly blow on the kingside.
35 Ra4 R3b5 36 Qa6 Rb2 37 Be1 Rb1 38 Rxb1 Rxb1 39 Qe2
After 39 Kf1 Nb6 40 Rxa3 Qc6! the threat of 41 ... Qh1+ is decisive.
39 ... Nc3 0-1
And 39 ... Qxa4 is not bad either. White’s last move suggests time
pressure. Indeed, perhaps he was already afflicted with it when he played 26
e5? as his play deteriorated sharply after a good start.
The Fianchetto on g7
Plan B appeals to many players – they want to make it harder for White to
keep the initiative he was granted by moving first, even if they are,
objectively speaking, allowing him to make more use of it with best play.
When there is a dynamic fight with tactical and strategic pitfalls it is much
easier for White to lose his way and hand over the initiative to Black. And
such a fight is more likely to occur when the position is imbalanced from the
first moves.
A kingside or ‘Indian’ fianchetto is a very popular response to 1 d4. It
includes the King’s Indian (the main line being 1 d4 Nf6 2 c4 g6 3 Nc3 Bg7 4
e4 d6 5 Nf3 0-0), the Grünfeld (with one typical sequence 1 d4 Nf6 2 c4 g6 3
Nc3 d5 4 cxd5 Nxd5 5 e4 Nxc3 6 bxc3 Bg7 7 Nf3 c5) and the Benko Gambit
(which often goes 1 d4 Nf6 2 c4 c5 3 d5 b5 4 cxb5 a6 5 bxa6 g6 6 Nc3
Bxa6). But perhaps the most double-edged is the Benoni.
How much risk (tactical or strategic) are you prepared to take in the
opening? In my early days as a chess player I had problems playing White
against counterattacking openings such as the Benoni. I just couldn’t work
out how to deal with them with a sufficient mixture of restraint and
aggression. My position would crumble in the face of a queenside advance of
the ... b5-b4 kind. I remember sitting helplessly at the board, knowing that
something disastrous was going to happen but with no idea of how to prevent
it. That is often the case when players learn theory but don’t understand the
plans and motivations behind it.
I was sensible enough to switch to playing 1 Nf3 and 2 g3 to avoid the
whole issue. If you don’t put pawns on c4 and d5 they can’t be undermined
by the ... b7-b5 advance. Of course Karpov would put his pawns on c4 and d5
and win, but what was that to me? I lost.
After a period playing 1 Nf3 (incidentally, a much longer period than was
good for my chess development) I switched to 1 e4. It seemed a better move
than 1 d4 as I couldn’t get crushed by the Benko or King’s Indian etc. Of
course this was a false impression as you can be destroyed by the Najdorf, or
a counterattacking line in the Ruy Lopez, just as easily as by any opening
after 1 d4 if you don’t know what you’re doing. But by the time I started
playing 1 e4 I was more experienced and understood the ideas behind the
openings much better. Nonetheless, there is something to be said for a fresh
start with a new first move as White. It doesn’t have any of the residue of
failure lingering around it from when you were a less strong player. And,
speaking more technically, it could be that there are bad habits you have
picked up in the way you handle certain openings which won’t be transferred
to new openings.
When I saw the following game I was reminded of my own plight against
the Benoni. Buhr is a strong player and for a time makes good preventive
moves, but then some positionally unjustified exchanges. The result is that,
like me, he can only watch as his position collapses on the queenside.
Game 70
C.Buhr-V.Malakhov
European Cup, Kallithea 2008
Answer: 8 a4!
A good preventive move. There is another sharp line after 8 e4!? b5 9
Qe2, which sets a nice trap: after the natural 9 ... Bg7? White has 10 Bxd6!,
the point being 10 ... Qxd6 11 e5 Qe7 (otherwise the discovered check on f6
wins) 12 d6 Qe6 13 Ng5 and Black is lost after 13 ... Qc4 14 Qf3, hitting a8
as well as f6, or 13 ... Qg4 14 f3! Qxg5 15 exf6+ Be6 16 fxg7 etc.
So Black probably does best to ‘change his mind’ and play 9 ... Be7!. He
doesn’t have his bishop where he wants it, but on the plus side his queenside
attack is going swimmingly with 10 ... b4, to push back the white knight, and
then ... Re8 in the air to target the e4-pawn (behind which the white queen
and king crouch awkwardly).
The importance of 9 ... Be7 reminds us once again that we can’t afford to
play according to a plan conceived before the game. You have to adapt your
strategy according to the specific circumstances which arise on the board. A
knowledge of theory will also help considerably by showing us how to avoid
tricks like 9 ... Bg7 10 Bxd6!.
8 ... Bg7 9 h3
Question: What are the benefits of this little move?
If White wants to seize more space then 9 e4 was the time for it.
However, while a big centre has its pluses, it would also be subject to
pressure (after 9 ... 0-0) by moves such as 10 ... Bg4 and 10 ... Re8.
Answer: Instead, White chooses a restrained approach. He makes a hole
on h2 for the bishop (should it be attacked by ... Nh5) and deprives the black
pieces of the use of the g4-square. Thus a future manoeuvre with ... Ng4 and
... Ne5 is prevented, and Black can’t ease the congestion in his camp by
exchanging off a piece with ... Bg4 and ... Bxf3. Note that the white knight on
f3 is involved in the fight for the e5-square and, as we shall see, can be
manoeuvred to c4 to attack d6. Therefore Black is by no means reluctant to
exchange it for a bishop with limited scope. In fact White would most likely
answer ... Bg4 with Nd2, keeping the knight and allowing the exchange of
bishops instead after ... Bxe2.
9 ... 0-0 10 e3 Qe7
Readying himself to develop the queen’s knight to d7 without dropping
the d6-pawn.
11 Be2 Nbd7 12 Nd2
The knight heads for the strategically important c4-square.
12 ... Ne5
13 Bxe5?
The positional jockeying would continue after 13 0-0 Rb8 14 Bh2 Ne8
etc. In the long term White would be aiming to advance in the centre while
doing his best to deter ... b7-b5 (if it became unstoppable he’d probably
throw in a4-a5 so that Black is left with a weak pawn on a6 in the event of ...
b7-b5 and a5xb6 en passant). For his part, besides ... b7-b5, Black might try
... f7-f5 to gain some control over the e4-square. He’ll be hoping that if the
white centre expands it will become overextended and implode.
After the faulty exchange with 15 Nb6 and 16 Nxc8 there are no
complicating factors to obscure the difference in power between the two
bishops. Black’s bishop can act with the rooks to support a queenside pawn
advance. In contrast, White’s bishop can do nothing to bring his central pawn
majority to life.
Question: How should Black energize his queenside pawns?
If now 40 Rxa3 then 40 ... Qxf2+ wins at once. Remember how Black
won in Radovanovic-Saric above? When you have tied down the enemy
pieces on one side of the board, the key to winning is often to create a threat
on the other wing. The stressed defenders are unable to respond in time to the
change of front.
Answer: Nevertheless, although the concept is correct, the
implementation would have been faster after 39 ... Qd2! 40 Rxb2 Qxb2!,
when the pawn advances to a1.
40 Rxb2 axb2 41 f4
If 41 Qc2 then 41 ... f5! (even better than queening at once) 42 Bd3 b1Q
43 Qxb1 Qxf2+ 44 Kh1 Qxg3 wins.
41 ... Qf2+
Trivial was 41 ... Qd2+ 42 Kh1 (42 Bg2 lets the b-pawn queen) 42 ...
Qc1+ and White must resign.
42 Kh1 Bf6 43 Qc2 Qxg3 44 Qe2 Qxh3+ 45 Kg1 h5 46 Bd3 Qg3+ 47
Kf1 h4 48 Qf2 Qxf2+ 49 Kxf2 g5 0-1
White won’t be able to cope with passed pawns so far apart once Black
brings his king forward.
A fine positional win by Malakhov despite the rather long-winded finish.
Game 71
D.Navara-T.Pähtz
Gibraltar 2018
9 ... Nb4?
Going against everything we have learnt about the need to co-ordinate the
action of the pieces.
The great 18th century French player Philidor claimed that the pieces
were the servants of the pawns. This is an exaggeration, but it is certainly true
that the big pieces have to play a supporting role when the position requires
the engineering of a pawn advance. The limelight goes to the pawns because
their expendability makes them plucky adventurers. They can be fearless
when used as a spearhead to undermine the opponent’s structure, as no harm
is done if they are exchanged for an enemy pawn. Therefore an individual
pawn can be both a hero and cannon fodder at the same time.
For these reasons Black’s 9 ... Nb4 is a senseless move. It looks
aggressive and threatens a favourable exchange on d3, but once the white
bishop moves out of the range the knight is out on a limb on b4. It does
nothing to help Black’s queenside build-up and is merely a target. It is too
valuable to sacrifice, too useless to help Black’s pawns.
In contrast, after 9 ... h6 10 Be3 Nc7 or the immediate 9 ... Nc7, the
knight can help support action on the queenside with ... b7-b5 (probably after
the exchange ... e6xd5 and recapture c4xd5; White might try to hinder this by
taking back with e4xd5, but then he has a smaller centre). The knight would
be safe from attack on c7 and not adrift from the other black pieces.
10 Be2 h6 11 Be3 exd5 12 cxd5 Re8 13 Nd2 Bd7 14 0-0 Rb8
Black decides to advance ... b7-b5 despite the knight’s foray to b4, but
putting the rook on b8 is too stereotyped. A much better method would be 14
... Qb8!, which defends the d6-pawn and then, if allowed, 15 ... b5.
Question: How can you put your finger on Black’s main weakness?
Answer: 15 Bf4!
Exactly. The attack on d6 is more awkward with the black rook sitting on
b8.
15 ... Qe7
Another ‘obvious’ but dubious decision, as the queen is left awkwardly
placed on e7. It was better to go into deep defence with 15 ... Bf8.
16 Re1 b5
To stop Nc4. The d6-pawn is difficult to defend. Here is what might
happen if Black cleared e8 for his knight to help guard it: 16 ... Red8 17 a3
Na6 18 Nc4 Ne8 19 e5! (a central breakthrough to take advantage of the
black queen’s precarious post) 19 ... dxe5 20 Nxe5 and Black is being
squashed in the centre. 20 ... Bxe5 merely hands over the key dark-squared
bishop after 21 Bc4 (intending 22 Bxe5), as 21 ... f6 22 d6+ wins the queen.
17 a3 Na6 18 a4!
Navara wants to gain control of c4. With the knight on a6 blocking the
pawn move ... a7-a6 there is no way for Black to hold onto the key square.
18 ... Nc7
After 18 ... b4 19 Nb5 (another square from which to attack d6) 19 ...
Bxb5 White has the lovely choice between 20 Bxb5, winning the exchange,
or 20 axb5 Nc7 21 Rxa7.
19 axb5 Nxb5 20 Bxb5 Bxb5 21 Nxb5 Rxb5 22 Nc4
Game 72
Ste.Mazur-A.Zahedifar
Ordu 2019
1 e4 c6
Black prepares an immediate challenge to the e4-pawn without (as is the
case in the French) blocking in the bishop on c8. In the main line White
maintains a space advantage, but Black is well entrenched with no
weaknesses.
2 d4 d5 3 Nc3 dxe4 4 Nxe4 Bf5 5 Ng3 Bg6 6 Nf3 e6
WFM Anahita Zahedifar has developed her light-squared bishop to an
active square before closing the path from c8. She is on the way to achieving
an easy development, so White has to respond vigorously.
7 h4
The plan is to establish a space advantage by hounding the bishop on g6.
This move is taken for granted nowadays, as theory has taught players of
White that there is no need to worry about the apparent loosening of their
king’s future residence on the kingside: he is going to be whisked off to the
queenside.
7 ... h6
Here 7 ... Nd7 is more usual, but Black is willing to invite the white
knight to e5 and then undermine it.
8 Ne5
Accepting the offer. Also possible was 8 h5 Bh7 9 Bd3 Bxd3 10 Qxd3,
preparing to castle with 11 Bd2 and 12 0-0-0.
8 ... Bh7 9 Bd3
If you play an opening you have to be aware of all the traps associated
with it.
Question: Why would taking the pawn on d4 now be a big mistake for
Black?
9 ... Bxd3
Answer: 9 ... Qxd4? looks like a useful extra pawn but is disastrous after
10 Nxf7!, when 10 ... Kxf7 11 Bg6+ wins the queen, while 10 ... Bxd3 11
Nxh8 is ruinous for Black.
10 Qxd3 Nd7 11 f4
Continuing his plan to gain space. Another approach was 11 Bf4 Nxe5 12
Bxe5, which would keep the bishop active.
11 ... Be7
A natural move; 11 ... Bb4+ will be examined in the next game.
12 Bd2 Ngf6
Sensible development, as White would have a strong initiative after 12 ...
Bxh4 13 0-0-0.
13 0-0-0 c5
In the example above it was the white pieces, rather than the black pieces,
which benefited from the opening of lines. Let’s see what happens if Black
plays in a more subtle style.
Game 73
V.Ivic-A.Predke
European Championship, Skopje 2019
1 e4 c6 2 d4 d5 3 Nd2 dxe4 4 Nxe4 Bf5 5 Ng3 Bg6 6 h4 h6 7 Nf3 e6 8 Ne5
Bh7 9 Bd3 Bxd3 10 Qxd3 Nd7 11 f4 Bb4+
This time Black gives a check before putting the bishop on e7. Cajoling
White into playing his next move doesn’t seem to make much difference, but
it will prove vital – such is the sophistication of modern opening systems.
12 c3 Be7 13 Bd2 Ngf6 14 0-0-0 c5
The freeing move which turned out to be a disaster in the previous game.
But this time it is White who has to be wary. Alexandr Predke, a rapidly
improving 25-year-old Russian grandmaster, had undoubtedly studied this
position with a computer. So why would he allow the next move if it is good
for White? But Ivic is fearless:
15 d5?!
Question: Can you see the riposte Black has against this move which
wouldn’t be available if White’s pawn were still on c2?
Answer: 15 ... Nxe5! 16 fxe5 Qxd5!
This is a key resource. With the pawn on c3, rather than c2, the white
queen is hanging, which means there is no time for White to win a piece with
17 exf6.
17 Qb5+
Still we must remember #3 in our list of possible drawbacks to the ... c6-
c5 freeing move. Black must tread carefully after the check on b5.
17 ... Nd7!
After 17 ... Qd7 18 Qe2! Nd5 19 c4 White has the initiative.
18 Bxh6
This looks strong at first glance, as White wins a pawn back and threatens
both the black queen and g7, but Predke has everything under control.
18 ... a6! 19 Qa4
White loses material after 19 Rxd5 axb5 29 Bxg7 Rg8.
19 ... b5 20 Qf4 Qxa2
The only move, but it more than keeps Black in the game. The safety of
both kings is now an issue.
21 Bxg7 Rg8 22 Nh5 b4!
Utilizing his resources. Black’s basic idea is to play ... b4xc3 to force
b3xc3, then ... c5-c4 and finally ... Ba3 mate.
23 Rhf1?
White cracks. He makes the fundamental mistake of attacking the black
king where it is, rather than where it is going to be. Therefore he loses a
tempo which is fatal in such a double-edged position.
Question: So where is the black king going to be in the future and how
can
we immediately plan action against him?
Black has just enough time to carry out the plan outlined above. The
threat of mate is crushing.
26 Qc6+ Kb8 27 Rxd7 Qa3+ 28 Kb1
Or 28 Kc2 Qb3+, while 28 Kd2 Rxd7+ 29 Qxd7 Rd8 wins the queen
while keeping an overwhelming attack.
28 ... Qb3+ 29 Kc1 Qxc3+ 30 Kb1 Rxd7 31 Qxd7 Qb3+ 32 Kc1 c3! 0-1
A neat finish. Here we see the attacking power of a queen supported by
an advanced pawn. The main threat is mate on a3 again as d2 is denied to the
white king, or if 33 Qxe7 then 33 ... Qb2+ 34 Kd1 Qd2 mate.
A Theory Arms-race
We saw in the Caro-Kann games above how theory becomes ever more
refined: 11 ... Be7 gets replaced by the nuance 11 ... Bb4+! 12 c3 Be7, when
the onus is on White to find a better idea. Some openings come with a huge
amount of theory attached, none more so than the Sicilian main lines (well,
maybe the Botvinnik System of the Semi-Slav is a contender). By all means
play these sharp lines if they suit your style, but remember that you’ll have to
do some deep preparation and be “standing on the shoulders of giants”, so to
speak: that is, having to follow long lines discovered by other players rather
than thinking for yourself (which might sound great until you remember that
your opponent might be standing on even higher shoulders!). Still, all the
effort feels worth it when you get to play some nice attacks with sacrifices, as
in the following game.
Game 74
N.Doghri-Z.Ilincic
Istanbul Olympiad 2000
12 ... b4?
It seems that Black has only to play 12 ... 0-0 to secure his king and have
a decent game, as 13 Bh6 can be met by 13 ... Nh5 (with a possible repetition
after 14 Qf3 Nhf6). However, there is a nasty surprise in store: 13 Bd5!!,
when 13 ... Nxd5 (13 ... exd5 14 Nf5 Ne8 15 Nxe7+ Kh8 16 Ncxd5 is
crushing) 14 Bh6! Bf6 (after 14 ... g6 15 exd5 either f8 or d5 falls) 15 Nxd5
exd5 (15 ... Be5 16 f4 is not much different) 16 Bxg7! Bh4 (or 16 ... Bxg7 17
Nf5 and mates) 17 Qxh4 Kxg7 18 Nf5+ Kh8 19 exd5 is catastrophic for
Black. There’s no good defence against threats such as 20 Qh6 Rg8 21 Re8!
planning to mate on g7, for if 19 ... Rg8 20 Re7 will break through on f7.
Therefore Black can’t escape his problems by castling. The 13 Bd5!! trick
is the sort of thing you need to know in advance before you play a sharp
opening. When I looked in my database there were no games in which 12 ...
0-0 was played. Anyone studying the Sozin without making the effort to
discover the refutation of plausible, but bad moves could find themselves
facing 12 ... 0-0 in a tournament and needing to find 13 Bd5 with their clock
ticking. Not an easy task. Of course, the chances are that you don’t play the
Sozin Attack and never intend to. Fair enough. But there are the equivalent of
natural, but bad, moves like 12 ... 0-0 in every opening which can only be
refuted by something difficult to see. Forewarned is forearmed: the more
work you do on your openings, the fewer nasty surprises you will face (or the
more opportunity you will give yourself to unleash nasty surprises on the
opponent).
To return to our game, Black’s choice of 12 ... b4 is also inadequate.
Grandmaster Ilincic not only allows his opponent to make a strong sacrifice,
he in effect goads him into doing so. It is clear that he has underestimated the
danger (perhaps being rated over 200 Elo points above his opponent had
made him in too much of a hurry to complicate matters).
Rather than spend a precious tempo on this provocation, Black should
play 12 ... Nc5!, when the chance to exchange off White’s bishop on b3
deters any sacrifice. Play might then proceed more quietly with 13 Kb1 (after
13 Qxg7 Rg8 14 Qh6 Nxb3+ 15 axb3 b4 16 Na4 Rg6 17 Qh4 Bd7 18 Kb1
Nxe4 19 Qxh7 Nf6 Black has plenty of play for a pawn) 13 ... Nxb3 14 axb3
0-0 15 Bh6 Ne8 16 f4 and only now is 16 ... b4 a good idea. Note that 13 ...
Nfxe4? would be a mistake in this sequence due to another sacrifice: 14 Nxe4
Qxe4 (14 ... Nxe4 15 Qxg7 is good for White) 15 Nxe6! Nxe6 (15 ... Bxe6 16
Bxc5 is no better for Black) 16 Bd5 Qa4 17 Bxa8 and White is winning.
Question: It’s your chance to carry out a sacrifice. Where should it be?
Answer: 13 Nf5!
Also crushing was 13 Nd5! exd5 (declining the sacrifice doesn’t save
Black; e.g. 13 ... Bf8 14 Bg5! h6 15 Bxf6 Nxf6 16 Nxf6+ gxf6 17 Nf5! exf5
18 exf5+ Kd8 19 Rxd6+ Bxd6 20 Qxd6+ Bd7 21 Bd5 Qb8 22 Qxf6+ Kc7 23
Re4! and the threat of 24 Rc4+ is decisive) 14 Bxd5 Nxd5 15 exd5 Nf6 16
Nc6 0-0 17 Bg5! and the threat to e7 is decisive: after 17 ... Re8 18 Bxf6
Black can’t recapture on f6 without allowing mate, while 17 ... Be6 (the best
try) 18 Nxe7+ Qxe7 19 dxe6 fxe6 20 Rxd6 sees White a pawn up with a
dominant game.
13 ... bxc3
If 13 ... exf5 then 14 Qxg7 attacks f7 as well as h8. Following 14 ... bxc3
15 Qxh8+ Nf8 16 exf5 or 14 ... Rf8 15 Nd5 Nxd5 16 Bxd5 Qb8 17 exf5, the
attack down the e-file is unstoppable.
14 Nxe7
14 ... cxb2+
The knight can’t be recaptured: 14 ... Kxe7 15 Qxd6+ Ke8 16 Bc5!
(threatening mate on e7) 16 ... Ng8 (or 16 ... Nxc5 17 Qd8 mate) 17 bxc3!
(Black was hoping for 17 Ba4 when he is totally lost, apart from the fact that
he has 17 ... Qxb2 mate!) 17 ... Qb8! (a tough way to resist, but White’s
initiative is too strong even after the exchange of queens) 18 Ba4 Qxd6 19
Rxd6 Rb8 20 c4! (to stop 20 ... Rb5 and also control the d5-square to prevent
Black playing ... Ngf6-d5 in some lines) 20 ... Kd8 (if 20 ... Ngf6 then 21 e5
and 22 Red1 wins) 21 Bxd7 Bxd7 22 Red1 Rb7 23 Rxa6 Ne7 24 Bb6+ and
now, as 24 ... Ke8 loses to 25 Ra8+ Nc8 26 Rxc8+ Bxc8 27 Rd8+ Ke7 28
Rxh8 Rxb6 29 Rxc8, Black has to enter an endgame with 24 ... Rxb6 25
Rxb6 where White has the winning advantage of a (very active) rook and
three pawns for two minor pieces.
That was a lot of moves! It reminds us that we can’t calculate everything:
we have to trust our intuition when it tells us our initiative isn’t going to
vanish, despite a major change such as a transition from a middlegame to an
endgame.
15 Kb1 Nxe4 16 Qxg7 Rf8
After 16 ... Kxe7 there is a safe way to win with 17 Qxh8 Ndf6 18 Bd4,
but another sacrifice also does the trick: 17 Bxe6! Kxe6 18 Bf4 d5 19 f3 and
the black king will soon be at the mercy of the white rooks.
17 Nd5 a5
After 17 ... exd5 18 Bxd5 Black is poleaxed.
18 Bh6
An aggressive move which also clears the way for the rook on e1.
18 ... a4
A last desperate counterattack.
19 Rxe4 axb3
Question: Black is actually threatening mate in one, but how can we get
at
the black king first?
Game 75
N.McDonald-N.Doghri
Budapest 1996
Here is the idea. White gives up a pawn to get mastery over the d5-
square. It seems good enough for equality, but no more than that.
11 ... Bxc4 12 Nxc4 Nxc2 13 Qxc2 Rxc4 14 Bg5 Be7 15 Bxf6 Bxf6 16
Qb3 Qc8 17 Rfd1 Qc6 18 Rd3 0-0 19 Rad1 Be7 20 Nd5 Bg5 21 Nc3 Be7
22 Nd5 Bg5 23 Rg3
I should have called it a draw with 23 Nc3.
23 ... Bd8 24 Qe3 Qxa4 25 Re1 Qd7
It turns out that 25 ... f5!, preparing to answer 26 b3 with 26 ... f4, is good
for Black.
Question: Can you see how White escapes his dubious position by
forcing
a draw?
Game 76
V.Artemiev-Z.Izoria
World Team Championship, Astana 2019
Question: The obvious response, but a serious mistake. Can you see
why?
Izoria stops 16 Nd4 and prepares the exchange of rooks on the d-file. He
must have thought he would soon be shaking hands to agree a draw.
And yet common sense should have warned him: “I’m up against a player
who is on fire at the moment, crushing almost of all his opponents with
White! He’s almost in the top ten in the world now. Did Artemiev really
come today without a plan for advantage? And this in a key match between
Russia and the United States ... ? No, let me look again at the position. What
does he have in mind?”
Alas for Black, no such checking took place.
Answer: 16 Bg5!
One careless move has put Black in trouble. The threat is 17 e5, and if 17
... h6 then 18 Rdc1! hxg5 19 Rxc5 wins a pawn as both c6 and g5 are
hanging. Now we see that 15 Ne2 may have looked passive but it cleared the
c-file for the white rooks to exploit the vulnerable black bishops. Had he been
more alert Izoria would have preferred 15 ... Rac8!, defending the bishop on
c6 and so avoiding trouble on the c-file.
16 ... Rxd1+ 17 Rxd1 Bd6
It appears at first glance that Izoria has found a way to deal with the
double threat of 18 Rc1 and 18 e5, but now comes a neat forcing sequence.
Black hopes to advance 26 ... a5 and then 27 ... b4. This would energize
his queenside pawns, clear the light squares for the bishop, and guard the c3-
square.
Answer: 26 Ba5!
A simple prophylactic move which keeps the black queenside tied up.
26 ... Bd7
The bishop tries to become active on the a2-g8 diagonal, but White is
ready again with a preventive measure.
27 Bb3!
One by one the white pieces take up good posts, while 27 ... Be6 28 Bxe6
fxe6 is gruesome for Black’s pawn structure.
27 ... Rc8 28 Nc3
And now it is the turn of the knight which heads for its dream post on d5.
28 ... Rc6
Black hopes to activate his rook along the third rank, as there is nothing
to gain on the c-file.
29 Nd5 Rh6
Here too if 29 ... Be6 then 30 Nc7+ and 31 Nxe6 inflicts doubled pawns.
30 Bc3!
The bishop has done its duty on a5 and is rerouted. If now 30 ... Rxh2
then 31 Bxe5 attacks the rook and will win the g7-pawn as well, while 30 ...
f6 31 h3 leaves the rook cut off and Black facing 32 Nc7+ and 33 Nxa6.
30 ... Kf8 31 h3!
It would be entirely unnecessary to activate the black rook with 31 Bxe5?
Re6 32 Bc3 Rxe4.
31 ... f5
If 31 ... f6 then 32 Bb4+ Ke8 (or 32 ... Kf7 33 Nc7+) 33 Nc7+ wins the
a6-pawn. Black can’t stand the slow death any longer and so, instead of
returning his rook to c6, gives up a pawn to try to activate his position on the
queenside.
32 exf5 Bxf5 33 Bxe5
Quite good enough, but the neat 33 Nc7! would be a high-class
prophylactic move. It threatens mate in two beginning with 34 Bb4+. Then
after 33 ... Ke7 34 Bxe5 Black wouldn’t have the chance to advance his
queenside pawns.
33 ... a5 34 Ke3 Rc6 35 Nc3
White’s task now is to restrain the energy of Black’s queenside pawns
and then pick them off.
35 ... b4 36 Bd5 Rc8 37 Nb5 Rc1
At last the black rook gets to enter the enemy camp, but he is confounded
by the enormous power of an aligned pair of bishops. Between them they are
guarding the a2, b2- and g2-pawns.
38 Nd6 Bb1 39 Nb7 Re1+ 40 Kd4 Re2
Izoria has put up a tough and excellent defence. If only he had been more
alert back at move 15 he would have avoided all this suffering.
41 a4!
A clinical winning move. Artemiev sees that he can hold back the
resulting black b-pawn and queen his own passed a-pawn.
41 ... Rxb2 42 Nxa5 Bc2 43 Nc4 Ra2 44 Bd6+ Ke8 45 Bxb4 1-0
The black rook drops for nothing after 45 ... Bxa4 46 Nd6+, while 45 ...
Rxa4 46 Bc6+ Kd8 47 Bxa4 Bxa4 leaves Black a piece down.
Flank Openings
White isn’t obliged to try to exploit his right to move first by building a pawn
centre. He could, for example, play 1 b3 or 1 g3 or, less modestly, 1 c4 or 1
Nf3 and then try to attack any centre that Black creates. He might not get
much initiative, but if he is familiar with the structure, ideas and theory, then
it promises chances of success. Basically, White is exchanging the advantage
of moving first for the chance to adopt a set-up he is comfortable with. Such
an approach is also attractive to players trying to avoid critical opening
theory.
Game 77
V.Artemiev-H.Nakamura
Gibraltar 2019
Answer: Black has every piece developed, a safe king and no pawn
weaknesses. But he isn’t quite equal. White is superior in two or three minor
ways:
1) His bishop on b2 has more scope than its counterpart on e7.
2) His queen has a comfortable and secure observatory post on e2 from
where she can look in all directions. The black queen’s view on c7 (where it
is natural to develop her) will be more circumscribed.
3) His centre has the potential to expand thanks to his extra pawn there. In
contrast, if Black tries to utilize his queenside majority with ... a7-a6, and
ever manages to threaten ... b6-b5, White can clamp down on it with a2-a4.
Well, this talk of White’s extra centre pawn and potential mobility might
make you conclude that he should deploy his rooks to c1 and d1 and then
advance d2-d4. But this would be against the spirit of the opening.
Black’s pieces would be well placed to put pressure on the hanging
pawns which result after the exchange ... c5xd4 and recapture e3xd4. Black
already has his rook on c8 ready for the job and could add moves like ... Qc7,
... Rfd8, ... Na5 and ... Ba6 to the pile. Notice how, in the assessment above,
we said that the black queen has a limited view on c7. That’s no longer true
after White breaks open the c-file and lets her eye the c4-pawn. And the meek
bishop on e7 would also be presented with an open diagonal.
In conclusion, Artemiev needs a plan to exploit his centre’s potential to
expand, but he mustn’t allow Black to activate his game by bombarding it. A
quick look around shows us that there are other ways to mobilize the pawns
besides d2-d4.
12 Rad1 Qc7 13 Ne1!
This modest retreat epitomes White’s plan. Black has three pieces lined
up on the c-file waiting for an attack that never comes. Meanwhile, White is
planning the advance of his f-pawn.
13 ... Ne8!
Question: Can you give some reasons for this move? (see below and the
note to 14 ... Nd6)
Answer: I’ve been praising White’s position but in fact the situation is
very close to equality. Nakamura knows a thing or two about strategy and
isn’t going to twiddle his thumbs while his opponent builds up pressure on
the f-file.
By mirroring the knight retreat of his opponent, he clears the way for the
advance of his own f-pawn and the activation of his dark-squared bishop on
f6.
14 f4
Intending 15 f5, when Black is liable to have an isolated pawn after an
exchange on e6, as the black e-pawn can’t abandon its duty of guarding the
d5-square from invasion by a white knight.
14 ... Nd6
We see another point to 13 ... Ne8: on d6 the knight holds up the advance
f4-f5 and is able to lend a hand in any queenside activity Black can drum up.
15 Nf3
Philidor would have approved of the courtesy shown by the white knight
to its f-pawn (compare the note to 9 ... Nb4 in Navara-Pähtz above). The
Frenchman viewed the pieces as the servants of the pawns, and this
relationship is exactly what we see in the knight ushering the pawn forward
and then following in its wake.
15 ... a6
Hinting at a possible expansion with ... b6-b5, so White puts a stop to it at
once.
16 a4 f5 17 d3 Bf6
Nakamura has completed his manoeuvre ... Nd6, ... f7-f5 and ... Bf6. His
pieces are well centralized, deterring White from expanding there. In addition
his pawns on e6 and f5 are keeping the white pieces out of the d5- and e4-
squares. Still, compared with White’s solid structure, the e6-pawn is kind of
‘floating’ with no supporting pillar. Meanwhile, the f5-pawn is vulnerable to
a flanking action on the kingside. Artemiev wastes no time in carrying it out.
18 h3
For the moment the d3- and e3-pawns hold the centre while the kingside
pawns get to have the fun. But their turn will soon come.
18 ... Nb4
Question: Can you see a way for White to create an outpost in the centre
in
good old Chapter Five style?
Answer: 23 Neg5!
Nakamura must have underestimated the strength of this move which
targets the isolated e6-pawn. Instead, 23 Qxb2 Bxe4 is fine for Black.
23 ... Bxf3
In order to win the d4-square for the bishop.
24 Rxf3 Bd4+ 25 Kh1 Rce8
Black’s problem isn’t so much the loss of the e6-pawn (after all the pawn
count remains equal) but the fact that the white knight will be able to take
over the e6-square as an outpost which can be supported by f4-f5.
26 Nxe6 Qc6 27 f5
Mission accomplished. The white knight dominates the centre. Only now
has White got a ‘real’ advantage in contrast to the vague promises of
‘superior mobility’ or ‘the initiative’. A knight on an outpost protected by a
pawn is something concrete that we can all readily understand, even see on
the board in front of us – if so inclined we can even tap the little horse on the
back and say “well done, fellow!”
27 ... Qxa4
In such situations you should grab material and hope for the best.
28 fxg6!
Well, the pawn on f5 didn’t stay defending the knight for long! But White
is converting one advantage – an outpost square supported by a pawn – into a
better one: the destruction of the black king’s pawn defences.
28 ... Rxf3
If 28 ... hxg6 then 29 Rxf8+ Rxf8 30 Nxf8 wins.
29 gxh7+ Kh8 30 Bxf3?
This is a natural recapture, but it might have allowed Black to escape.
Instead, 30 Qxf3! gives White a decisive attack; e.g. 30 ... Rxe6 31 Qf8+
Kxh7 32 Rf1 Bg7 (or 32 ... Rg6 33 Be4) 33 Qf5+ Rg6 34 Be4 (the pin on g6
is fatal) 34 ... Qe8 35 Qh5+ Bh6 36 Bxg6+ Qxg6 37 Rf7+ and Black loses the
queen.
Notice how the presence of opposite-coloured bishops gives White’s
initiative extra potency, as Black’s bishop can do nothing to guard against an
attack on the light squares. It has even been said that “when there are
opposite-coloured bishops the player with the attack has an extra piece”. A
wild exaggeration of course, but it’s worth remembering if we need
encouragement to play a move like 30 Qxf3.
30 ...
Nc6?
Question: What is the tactical refutation of this move and can you make
the strange-looking 30 ... Nd3 work for Black?
Answer: Things are grim for the black king due to the absence of the
queen and knight from the defence. However, he had a spectacular chance to
remedy both ills with 30 ... Nd3!!. Upon 31 Qxd3 Rxe6 Black is ready to play
32 ... Qe8 to staunch the defence with equal chances, while after 31 Rxd3?!
Qxc4 surprisingly White doesn’t have a good way to stop 32 ... Qxe6, when it
would be Black for preference. In either variation an unexpected co-
ordination of Black’s queen and rook saves his king.
It would have been very difficult to see 30 ... Nd3 in time pressure, even
for a player of Nakamura’s class.
Alas, computers have distorted what should be perceived as an excellent,
controlled performance by White. If this game had been played in, say, 1985
everyone would have congratulated White on a smooth win. Nowadays, as
soon as a top player in time pressure misses a bizarre defence you get online
kibitzers yelling “30 ... Nd3!. He missed 30 ... Nd3!” across seven continents.
31 Nxc5! 1-0
The white knight gets to strike the final blow, but it is unexpectedly
backwards and to the left rather than against the black king. The game ends
abruptly, as after 31 ... Rxe2 32 Nxa4 Black is already two pawns down and
has a rook and knight hanging. If he saves them with 32 ... Re6 then the
bishop is the victim: 33 Bxc6 Rxc6 34 Rxd4.
Index of Games
Anand.V-Giri.A, Shamkir 2019
Anand.V-Nakamura.H, London Chess Classic 2010
Aronian.L-Carlsen.M, Stavanger 2017
Aronian.L-Rapport.R, Wijk aan Zee 2017
Aronian.L-Vachier-Lagrave.M, London Chess Classic 2018
V.Artemiev-Z.Izoria, World Team Championship, Astana 2019
V.Artemiev-H.Nakamura, Gibraltar 2019
Banusz.T-Vajda.L, Szentgotthard 2010
Belov.V-Socko.B, Hastings 2004/05
Buhr.C-Malakhov.V, European Cup, Kallithea 2008
Carlsen.M-Anand.V, Grand Chess Tour, Zagreb 2019
Carlsen.M-Grischuk.A, Shamkir 2019
Carlsen.M-Hossain.E, Baku Olympiad 2016
Carlsen.M-Karjakin.S, Sinquefield Cup, St. Louis 2017
Carlsen.M-Yu Yangyi, Stavanger 2019
Caruana.F-Carlsen.M, Grenke Classic, Karlsruhe/Baden Baden 2019
Caruana.F-Carlsen.M, Tromsø Olympiad 2014
Caruana.F-Karjakin.S, Sinquefield Cup, St. Louis 2018
Caruana.F-Karjakin.S, Stavanger 2018
Caruana.F-Shankland.S, US Championship, St. Louis 2016
Demchenko.A-Gukesh.D, Ho Chi Minh City 2019
Doghri.N-Ilincic.Z, Istanbul Olympiad 2000
Duda.J-Navara.D, Prague 2019
Duda.J-Rapport.R, Wijk aan Zee 2019
Fedoseev.V-Giri.A, Wijk aan Zee 2019
Fedoseev.V-Shankland.S, Wijk aan Zee 2019
Giri.A-Caruana.F, Wijk aan Zee 2013
Giri.A-Harikrishna.P, Shenzhen 2019
Grischuk.A-Gelfand.B, FIDE Grand Prix, Khanty-Mansiysk 2015
Grischuk.A-Volokitin.A, Baku Olympiad 2016
Habu.Y-Kasparov.G, Rapid Match, Tokyo 2014
Hou Yifan-Toufighi.H, Subic Bay 2009
Ivanisevic.I-Ivanchuk.V, European Championship, Batumi 2018
Ivic.V-Predke.A, European Championship, Skopje 2019
Karjakin.S-Esipenko.A, World Rapid Championship, Riyadh 2017
Karjakin.S-So.W, FIDE Candidates, Berlin 2018
Korobov.A-Anand.V, German Bundesliga 2019
Kramnik.V-Shankland.S, Wijk aan Zee 2019
Lagno.K-Ivanchuk.V, Cap d'Agde (rapid) 2008
Lalic.B-Vicas.M, Dublin 2019
Ledger.A-Kosten.A, British League 2001
Mamedyarov.S-Ding Liren, FIDE Candidates, Berlin 2018
Matlakov.M-Aronian.L, FIDE World Cup, Tbilisi 2017
Mazur.S-Zahedifar.A, Ordu 2019
McDonald.N-Doghri.N, Budapest 1996
Meier.G-Vachier-Lagrave.M, Grenke Classic, Karlsruhe/Baden Baden
2019
Melkumyan.H-Shankland.S, Batumi Olympiad 2018
N.Ross.C-Spinu.E, IBCA Olympiad, Ohrid 2017
Nabaty.T-McDonald.N, London Chess Classic 2017
Naiditsch.A-Svidler.P, Grenke Classic, Karlsruhe/Baden Baden 2019
Navara.D-Pähtz.T, Gibraltar 2018
Nepomniachtchi.I-Karjakin.S, Grand Chess Tour, Zagreb 2019
Nikac.P-Dukaczewski.P, IBCA Championship, Cagliari 2019
Nisipeanu.L-Radjabov.T, Medias 2010
Paravyan.D-Golubov.S, Korchnoi Memorial, St. Petersburg 2018
Petrosian.T-Martirosyan.H, Aeroflot Open, Moscow 2019
Phillips.O-Ross.C, Solihull 2017
Radjabov.T-Vidit.S, Wijk aan Zee 2019
Radovanovic.N-Saric.I, European Championship, Skopje 2019
Rapport.R-Giri.A, Wijk aan Zee 2019
Rasik.V-Laznicka.V, Czech Championship, Karlovy Vary 2004
Robson.R-Caruana.F, US Championship, St. Louis 2018
Sandipan.C-Ivanchuk.V, Gibraltar 2018
Serper.G-Becerra Rivero.J, Ledyard 2000
So.W-Sadzikowski.D, Gibraltar 2019
Sutovsky.E-Eljanov.P, Poikovsky 2014
Topalov.V-Wojtaszek.R, Shamkir 2018
Tuka.O-Nikac.P, IBCA Championship, Cagliari 2019
Vachier-Lagrave.M-Caruana.F, Stavanger 2018
Vachier-Lagrave.M-Navara.D, Biel 2018
Vachier-Lagrave.M-Tari.A, Gibraltar 2019
Valmana Canto.J-Harikrishna.P, Spanish League 2006
Van Foreest.J-Lewtak.D, European Championship, Skopje 2019
Volokitin.A-Mamedyarov.S, European Cup, Eilat 2012
Wang Yue-Radjabov.T, FIDE Grand Prix, Sochi 2008
Winants.L-Eliet.N, Belgian League 2014
Yu Yangyi-Artemiev.V, Gibraltar 2019