Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Essentra Ar 2020 Final PDF Strategic and Governance
Essentra Ar 2020 Final PDF Strategic and Governance
for the
future
Annual Report 2020 – Strategic and Directors’ Reports
01 ESSENTRA PLC ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
THE FUTURE
5 Chairman’s Statement Governance Statement
8 Chief Executive’s Review 83 Board of Directors
15 Delivering on our purpose 85 Corporate Governance
17 Our response to the Report
ESSENTRA
AT A GLANCE
Made up of three global
divisions, Essentra is a
Components Packaging Filters
leading provider of essential
components and solutions.
Every day we produce and
distribute millions of small See page 67 for See page 71 for See page 75 for
but essential products. Components overview Packaging overview Filters overview
50
Revenue £897m £974m -8 -7
7,065
Adjusted1 operating
profit £62m £88m -29 -28
Adjusted1 pre-tax profit £46m £73m -37 -35
principal
manufacturing employees Adjusted1 net income2 £37m £59m -36 -35
facilities Adjusted1 basic earnings
per share 13.1p 21.3p -38 -37
34
Dividend per share 3.3p 6.3p -48 n/a
Net debt £210m £284m -26 n/a
3
Net debt to EBITDA 1.8x 2.0x n/a n/a
countries
worldwide Net debt to EBITDA
(pre IFRS16) 1.5x 1.9x n/a n/a
32
Free cash flow3 £56.9m £40.7m n/a n/a
research
and development Reported operating
centres profit £22m £80m -73 -72
£255.0m
European Automated Warehouse Process Redesign (BPR)
• Continued delivery of “hassle-
A leading global in Germany, providing platform programme coupled with launch
free” service provision despite
manufacturer and challenging environment, with
for improved service levels and of a new Customer Relationship
(2019: £283.3m)
distributor of a further improvement of NPS
reduction in cost to serve across Management (CRM) platform
Adjusted operating profit1
comprehensive range mainland Europe which will be integrated in 2021
£45.5m
by four points
of components, used • Completed roll-out of new web
• Actions taken to drive cross selling • Comprehensive programme
in diverse industrial and enhance market share gains focusing on improving sustainable
platform across Europe and
applications and such as enhanced e-Commerce product offering (2019: £60.3m)
introduction of agile monthly
end-markets. offering and cross selling training
improvement process, with 2021
plans for launch in Asian markets
Packaging 2020 summary • Continued delivery of new business • Awarded “Packaging News” Revenue
£363.2m
wins 2020 UK Packaging Company
• Resilient trading performance
One of very few multi- • Increased customer satisfaction to of the Year
against backdrop of fewer
continental suppliers of prescriptions and elective 81% (2019: 79%) ahead of industry
(2019: £352.7m)
a full range of secondary surgeries, and improving trends average score of 76%
packaging to the Adjusted operating profit1
as the year progressed • Operational KPIs improved, for
pharmaceutical, personal
care and beauty sectors.
• Support to fight against COVID-19
through supply of products to
example improvement in quality by
30% versus 2019 £13.8m
the pharma industry, including • Acquisition of 3C! Packaging, (2019: £15.1m)
packaging for leading anti-viral strengthening position in
drug and two of the leading important pharmaceutical market
COVID-19 vaccines
Filters 2020 summary • Support to customers to ensure • Significant focus on the Revenue
£278.3m
business continuity in their supply development of sustainable
• Resilient performance despite
The only global challenging backdrop of volume
chain products including launch of
independent provider of • One further outsourcing contract proprietary biodegradable filters
declines (2019: £303.6m)
filters and related solutions agreed with an independent and SupaStrip™ PCR tape made
• Operational KPIs continued to from 70% recycled content Adjusted operating profit1
customer during the year
£25.2m
to the tobacco industry. improve with focus on reduction
in lead time to further enhance • Plans on track to establish
customer service manufacturing facility for China
Joint Venture towards the end of (2019: £36.2m)
• Continued focus on key account
Q2 2021
management delivering deeper 1 Before amortisation of acquired
understanding of customer needs • Launch of Tobacco Heating intangible assets and adjusting items
and a more robust pipeline Product (THP) Vortex Filter, 2 Net income is defined as profit after
expanding the division’s tax, before minority interests
3 A reconciliation of free cash flow is set
NGP offering out in the Financial Review on page 46
04 ESSENTRA AT A GLANCE CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
£896.5m £62m
Adjusted results exclude certain
THIS YEAR
items because, if included, these
items could distort the
understanding of Essentra’s
performance for the year and
the comparability between
(2019: £974.1m) (2019: £87.5m) periods. In management’s view,
such adjusted performance
measures (APMs) reflect the
underlying performance of the
Adjusted operating margin Reported operating profit
6.9% £21.7m
business and provide a more
13.1p 1.7p
• Progress on sustainability, KPIs and page 48 for APMs.
3.3p 123%
future≈results or developments
global divisions well placed expressed or implied by the
1.8x £287m
conservation and building • Resilient platform, result of new information, future
events or otherwise, except to
for our future driving profitable and the extent legally required.
cash generative growth
• High customer satisfaction
levels leading to deepened (2019: 2.0x) (2019: £260m)
customer franchises
05 CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
RENEWED FOCUS
“Staff have pulled together
ON OUR PEOPLE to support each other
Awards UK
Packaging Company
20
roll out of its websites in Europe with further
regions due to complete in 2021, both are The Sustainability Committee has been one of
strategic initiatives that underpin growth. Those our governance success stories for 2020 and I
businesses acquired during 2019 have continued am pleased that its Chairman, Ralf Wunderlich,
their integration: Innovative Components in has grasped the opportunity to champion this
Zero Waste To Landfill sites as an issue he truly stands behind.
the US and Costa Rica continues to do well,
(8 sites in 2019) as does Nekicesa in Spain in the Packaging
division. As has been reported previously, the Our stakeholders
Packaging division continues its turnaround With travel curtailed during the year, it has
journey and embarked on a series of measures not been possible for the Board to meet
in Q4 2020 which represents a further move staff. We have instead sought other ways to
to refining that business. Essentra Packaging engage with staff to ensure we hear directly
received the much deserved UK Packaging how staff are managing. Our Voice of the
Award in December, which the team are Employee programme has continued and has
rightly immensely proud of, and this underpins been adapted to a virtual programme. Mary
the potential and growing strength of that Reilly and Ralf Wunderlich have met with
business. Despite COVID-19 our Filters division staff remotely, joining either informal team
continued to make progress with the Chinese meetings or purpose specific events. We are
Joint Venture which is on track to become pleased that the virtual model will be able to
operational during 2021. continue once travel restrictions ease, allowing
Mary and Ralf to reach out and meet a greater
07 CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
number of employees, whilst keeping travel payment of certain fines, in relation to Company, in particular in his role as Senior
and the resultant impact on the environment past sanctions compliance breaches, was Independent Director during a period in which
to the essential only. a matter of focus for the Board during the Company experienced significant change.
the year. The recent conclusion of the US The Board and I would like to thank Tommy
Our usual annual physical events, such as authorities’ review provides a cautionary for his considerable and valued contribution
the Make It Work Awards and Leadership reminder of the importance of a robust during his six-year tenure.
Conference were regrettably unable to compliance programme. With no additional
go ahead. Instead, the Board met weekly enforcement action confirmed, our compliance COVID-19 brought a real-time crisis to the
during the first lockdown in the UK, and transformation programme remains a priority Board to manage through. The focus on
had the opportunity on those calls to hear to ensure we continue to operate within the Directors’ Duties and Section 172 of the
from members of the GMC, and from other requirements of the DPA. Companies Act, emphasises the need for
staff, on how the business was responding. that legislation, and throughout our Annual
It has not been surprising therefore, that the Our dividend Report you will learn more about practical
results of the 2020 Employee Engagement The Board is pleased to confirm that it ways in which the Board took into account
Survey show staff are very engaged with the proposes a dividend payment of 3.3p per the interests of all its stakeholders including
business, with high levels of engagement share (2019: 6.3p). The 2019 final and 2020 employees, the wider community and
BUILDING FOR
THE FUTURE
A new strategic roadmap for 2020 and beyond
2020 was a uniquely
challenging year and
I could not be prouder
We have refreshed our 2020 priorities
of the way the Essentra purpose, values and goals • Safeguarding our
people’s physical,
global family responded.
to better reflect who we
emotional and
physical wellbeing
13.1p
OUR of a robust compliance
Safety, respect
PURPOSE
A winning,
engaged and framework and culture
and diversity
empowered team
is to responsibly
provide the • Continued investment in
(2019: 21.3p) Openness, honesty products and Class-leading
systems, equipment and
High employee and integrity services our sustainability
engagement
customers
need to succeed innovation, including the
maintained in 2020
Energy
for change
Growth through
innovation development of more
77%
sustainable products
(78% in 2019)
09 CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S REVIEW CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
A winning, engaged
and empowered team
Our people remain at the heart of our journey
and our continued resilience throughout 2020
would not have been possible without their
commitment, passion and energy.
During the year we made progress delivering the
employee lifecycle introduced in 2019, as well as
safeguarding our people’s physical, emotional and
85%
of employees believe that
financial wellbeing in the wake of the pandemic. Essentra took the appropriate
steps to ensure employees
remained safe and healthy
during the pandemic.
Class-leading
In 2020 we announced
new environmental
KPIs and targets.
These demonstrate a
significant step forward
sustainability
in our sustainability
agenda and the delivery
of our purpose.
Growth through
innovation
In 2020 we have been
building the right
foundations to enable our
goal of driving growth
through innovation.
These foundations
include an innovation
mindset, core skills
and capabilities to drive
innovation and a robust
decision gate process to
manage a healthy pipeline
of innovation activities.
12 CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S REVIEW CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Funds enabled us to
strengthen our – already
resilient – financial position
– further evidence of
the proactive actions
we took in the face The acquisition of 3C! was enabled by a cash these proposals will have on some of our
of COVID-19. box placing launched in September, where colleagues, these actions are both necessary
over 38m Essentra shares were offered for and consistent with our strategy to build for
sale to institutional investors, senior Directors the future. As we manage through these
of Essentra and retail investors. In addition and other challenges in 2021 we will be
to the acquisition the funds enabled us to guided by our purpose and values, acting
strengthen our – already resilient – financial in a responsible way.
position – further evidence of the proactive
actions we took in the face of COVID-19. I am incredibly proud of the progress we have
made in 2020 despite the very challenging
While our business results have inevitably been context and believe that we have established
impacted by the pandemic, our performance strong foundations on which to build in 2021.
in 2020 recovered well by Q4, with improving I am proud to lead this organisation and
revenue and order trends and all three global immensely grateful to all our people for their
divisions well-positioned for growth. efforts in a difficult year.
Despite this resilient performance, 2020 Looking forward, by living our purpose, staying
was clearly not without its challenges and true to our values and delivering our business
2021 is set to hold more. The finalisation of goals I believe we will build a better, brighter
Brexit and an even more uncertain broader future – as one team and one family.
macroeconomic environment means we will
continue to undertake regular reviews and Paul Forman
introduce mitigating actions as necessary. Chief Executive
5 March 2021
In 2020 we also launched a detailed review
of our global footprint which resulted in the
announced closure of certain sites in 2021
across the Components and Packaging
divisions. While we deeply regret the impact
By order of the Board
Paul Forman
Chief Executive
5 March 2021
15 DELIVERING ON OUR PURPOSE ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Providing business
continuity for a customer
impacted by lockdown
One of Essentra’s largest multi-national Filters
customers was required to activate business
continuity plans in response to a government
lockdown and switched production overnight
to three of their other plants within the region.
At Essentra we are
managing our response to
Safeguarding As well as physical wellbeing,
we have recognised that the
In October we launched our global health and
wellbeing strategy – Essentra Thrives – which
the COVID-19 pandemic our people pandemic has had a
significant impact on our
included the extension of Employee Assistance
Programmes to all our global locations.
around four priorities:
At Essentra our number one priority has employees’ emotional well-
been to safeguard our people, both as the being. Some of our people who We have also provided financial support to
pandemic hit and as we planned for our continued to work in a factory employees when they have been unable to
Safeguarding future in its wake. With our employees’ setting have faced challenges work as a consequence of local or national
our people physical wellbeing in mind, early on in the around maintaining their Government restrictions arising from the
year we restricted business travel, especially journeys to and from home pandemic and to the families of those
for those travelling internationally. We also during lockdown. Therefore, employees who have sadly lost their lives.
introduced strict hygiene and protective some critical factory and At the peak of the pandemic in 2020 there
Supporting safety measures across all of our global warehouse employees in high were around 800 furloughed employees in
our customers sites, in line with and often exceeding local risk countries were provided with alternative 12 countries and Company furlough payments
regulations. These measures were formalised temporary housing. Employees who have were made to employees unable to work in
around the middle of year into a Physical been forced to work from home instead India, South Africa and Paraguay. We did
Health Policy which established global of in an office setting have faced different not use UK Government provided furlough
Managing our standards on social distancing, hygiene, PPE, challenges – for some isolation, for others the support, nor did we borrow debt from the UK
cash flow quarantine periods and return to site. In some difficulties of balancing work life with children Government. Overall we have been able to
of our badly affected areas, we extended the or other dependants at home. In response maintain 80% of earnings across the global
provision of PPE to family members of direct we set up informal support networks and workforce throughout the year.
employees, wanting to ensure the wider alternative working arrangements for
Building for wellbeing of the communities we work in. particular groups of employees, so that
the future We also established measures around site they could connect with colleagues in a
visitors, deliveries and collections. similar situation. Read more about our winning, engaged
and empowered team from page 31
18 OUR RESPONSE TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
A RESILIENT
PLATFORM, DRIVING
PROFITABLE AND Our key
strengths... Balanced Organic growth
CASH GENERATIVE business model potential in all divisions
We have placed a
strong emphasis on purpose,
values and sustainability,
underpinned by governance
and reward structures.
21 OUR BUSINESS MODEL ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
OUR BUSINESS
MODEL
Our purpose What we do Our values Our goals Who we serve
We manufacture
Whether it is a tiny but critical component A winning,
Safety,
or a bespoke solution to a complex need, we engaged and
respect and
have the skills and capability to manufacture empowered
diversity
Our a wide range of products. team Automotive Construction Electronics
purpose is
We partner
to responsibly We take a long-term partnership approach
provide the with suppliers and customers so we can Openness,
Class-leading
products and deliver what our customers need, when honesty and
sustainability
they need it. integrity
services our Equipment Fabrication Food and
manufacturing
customers
Beverage
We distribute
need to Our global scale and market knowledge
mean that we are able to anticipate and
succeed. meet the needs of our customers, whether Growth
Energy for
large or small, in a wide variety of end- through
change
markets and geographies. innovation Personal Care Pharmaceutical Retail POP/
and Beauty Paper and Board
BUILDING
FOR THE FUTURE
Tobacco
OUR VALUES OUR GOALS
OUR
PURPOSE
Safety, respect A winning,
and diversity engaged and
empowered team
is to responsibly
provide the
Openness, honesty products and Class-leading
and integrity services our sustainability
customers
need to succeed
Energy Growth through
for change innovation
OUR COMPETITIVE
ADVANTAGE
STAKEHOLDER
ENGAGEMENT
Stakeholder group
Investors
At Essentra we actively manage a
range of key stakeholder relationships, The major interests in our shares are set out on page 145.
recognising that our success and Key metrics:
sustainability depends on their • Earnings Per Share • Total Shareholder
input and involvement. (EPS) Return (TSR)
• Total dividends paid • Dividend yield
and cover
Stakeholder group
Suppliers Employees
The Company has a large number of international suppliers and also partners with a high volume of Our employees are vital in ensuring we provide quality products and services to our customers and
small businesses. operate our business activities effectively and efficiently.
Each division presents distinct key supplier groups. 85% of Filters and Packaging’s raw materials come Key metrics:
from a small proportion of suppliers used. 80% of our indirect spend eg on IT, is concentrated with a
• Employee • Safety KPI: Lost • Gender diversity in
small number of key suppliers. The Components division utilises a mature network of key suppliers.
engagement Time Incident and management levels
Number of Days Lost
Why is it important to engage? What were the key topics of engagement
Our suppliers are fundamental to the quality of and what feedback and input did the Board/
Why is it important to engage? What were the key topics of engagement
our products and to ensuring that as a business management obtain?
The Company’s long-term success is based on the and what feedback and input did the Board/
we meet the high standards of conduct that we • the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic
daily commitment of our workforce to our purpose, management obtain?
set ourselves. on business continuity and the Company’s
values and goals. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the
We are fundamentally a conversion business financial position
To maintain our competitive advantage and meet Company’s financial position and operations,
and are dependent on our suppliers to • impact of Brexit on business continuity
the growing demands of the environment in which as well as the impact on employees.
provide our goods ethically, within our code in our UK and European factories
• sustainable procurement has continued we operate, we need a workforce which is adaptive The results of the 2020 employee survey:
of conduct, on time and to the quality
to gain an increased focus. and whose skill base constantly evolves. We also • 91% participation (90% 2019) and 77%
required by our customers.
value workers with long-term practical experiences. (78% last year) engagement
Innovation is key to the success of our business What was the impact of the engagement
including any actions taken? How management and/or Directors • the survey told us that our employees feel
and engaging with suppliers early is fundamental
We develop long-term, strategic relationships engaged? particularly positive about working for
to the enabling of new products.
formed on the basis of trust and understanding We engage with our people regularly and have Essentra, how we responded to the pandemic
How management and/or Directors developed a people strategy which seeks to create and our plans to build for the future.
and which are to the mutual benefit of both
engaged? an environment in which our people are happy at
parties. We collaborate with our suppliers on key Engagement between employees and the Board
We engage with local suppliers through work and that best supports their wellbeing.
initiatives and innovation projects. Employee Champions covered a number of key
working group initiatives that are run by
In order to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 We invest significantly in our people as we believe topics including recognition, reward and resource
regional management.
and Brexit, the Company developed a broad that maintaining low turnover rates across the and investment allocation.
Our supplier code of conduct and Modern entire workforce is the source of our industry-
set of contingency plans. What was the impact of the engagement
Slavery Statement is shared with all key and leading efficiency and productivity rates.
The key supplier management programme including any actions taken?
new suppliers.
initiated in 2019 has allowed us to drive our We distribute an employee survey to all our In responding to the COVID-19 pandemic we
Our Procurement team runs a supplier employees annually. Employees are provided with have made safeguarding employee wellbeing
environmental and social policies down the
development programme with all key suppliers. information of concern, including factors affecting our top priority.
supply chain.
company performance through regular Chief Based on survey feedback, in 2021 we will be
As anticipated, by the end of 2020 more than
Executive updates and town hall briefings. focusing on strengthening engagement around
70% of our supplier spend was covered by our
Ethics Code certification. To meet the requirements of the 2018 Code, the careers and talent, new ways of working and
Board has appointed two designated Non- recognition. Site action plans were agreed by the
Executive Directors to be responsible for the end of January 2021 and regular meetings are
employee voice; Board Employee Champions. scheduled throughout the year to track progress.
In 2021 the Board will support the continued roll-
out of the people strategy and continue to develop
and evolve the Board Employee Champion roles.
25 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Stakeholder group
Wherever we operate we are committed to conducting business in line with the appropriate laws and regulation.
Why is it important to engage? What were the key topics of engagement What was the impact of the engagement
As a global company with many local and what feedback and input did the Board/ including any actions taken?
operations, Essentra is committed to working management obtain? We maintain a strong and transparent dialogue
with governments at national, regional and The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the with various government and regulatory
local level in establishing sound and transparent Company, in particular: agencies.
working relationships. This is to ensure that the • how we have managed the safety our people In many instances our COVID-19 safety approach
way we conduct business with customers and through implementation of COVID-19 safety exceeded local requirements and included
suppliers, and how we treat our people and the practices to ensure that we meet all local testing as well as additional support for families
community in which we operate meets both requirements and also identify additional through the provision of PPE and hygiene
local requirements as well as Essentra’s Code of support or measures that we could take materials.
Ethics. to best safeguard our people depending Some sites temporarily closed in line with local
In accordance with our Ethics Code, Essentra on their location government regulations and staff were paid
does not provide financial contributions to • the position relating to government support in furlough or received pay to a minimum of 80%
political parties and lobby groups. each country so as to replicate similar furlough their usual pay, which was often in excess of
How management and/or Directors or payment arrangements across the Group in local requirements.
engaged? all locations
The resolution of historical sanction issues has
Engagement with regulators and governments • the need for our manufacturing sites to
driven improvements through the compliance
is undertaken in various ways across our global remain operational despite COVID-19
transformation programme that continues
operations. restrictions, especially those serving critical
to be embedded within the Group and sees
industries involved in the fight against
Essentra is committed As a UK listed company the Board and the GMC increasing awareness and understanding
COVID-19.
working with governments at manage many of these while our global teams amongst staff at all levels.
national, regional and local level engage local governments as necessary. In 2020 Essentra FZE Company Limited
The Company has co-operated fully with the
in establishing sound and reached a public settlement with the US
US authorities and, whilst cautioned by OFAC
transparent working Department of Justice and the US Office of
on the importance of a robust sanctions
relationships. Foreign Assets Control relating to sanctioned
compliance programme, no further enforcement
market compliance failures in the Filters
action is being taken and the Company
business. A Deferred Prosecution Agreement
continues to operate within the terms of the
was entered into with the US Department
Deferred Prosecution Agreement.
of Justice and a fine of $666,543.88 paid to
settle certain sanctions violations by the Filters The Company maintains its focus on continuous
business in Dubai. improvement to drive the effectiveness of
its response to sanction regimes and other
As previously advised, the Company had made
compliance requirements.
a voluntary disclosure to the U.S. Department
of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control
(OFAC), with regards to certain other historical
transactions by the Filters business dating as far
back as 2015.
26 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Stakeholder group
Read more about how we
responded to the COVID-19
Customers pandemic on page 17
Our purpose is to provide the parts, products and services our customers need to succeed
as a business.
Key metrics:
• On Time and In Full • Quality/complaints • Net Promoter Score
(OTIF)
KEY PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS
The delivery Like-for-like revenue growth (%) Adjusted operating profit1 (£m) Adjusted earnings per share1 (p)
in the delivery sales by operating in selected geographies and Why this is important Why this is important
categories, and offering differentiated, cost- Measures the profitability of the Company Measures the benefits generated for
of value. competitive products and services shareholders from the Company’s
overall performance
Alignment of KPIs to
executive remuneration
erformance measures
P Net working capital2 ratio (%) Adjusted operating cash flow3 (£m)
for the executive Annual
Bonus Plan 2020 14.2 2020 76
Adjusted operating
erformance measures for
P 2019 14.3 2019 72 cash flow (£m)
76
the executive Long-Term
2018 13.7 2018 77
Incentive Plan
How we measure it
85 2018
How we measure it
20.7
3.3
(6.3 in 2019)
Adjusted operating cash flow3 as a Total dividends paid divided by the number
percentage of adjusted operating profit2 of relevant shares in issue
Why this is important Why this is important
Measures how the Company converts Measures the amount of cash per share 1 Excluding impact of amortisation
its profit into cash/quality of the which the Company returns to shareholders of acquired intangible assets and
adjusting items.
Company’s earnings 2 As defined in the Financial Review
on page 46.
3 As defined in the Alternative
Performance Measures on page 49
Return on Capital Employed (%) Return on Invested Capital (%) Total Shareholder Return (%)
How we measure it
22.4 2018
How we measure it
9.6 2018
How we measure it
-32.3
123%(82% in 2019)
Adjusted operating profit1 divided Adjusted operating profit1 after tax Total annual increase in value. Based on
by (tangible fixed assets and net divided by (capital employed plus the increase in share price and the dividend
working capital) intangible assets) paid to shareholders
Why this is important Why this is important Why this is important
Measures how effectively the Company Measures the Company’s ability to Measures the Company’s ability to generate
uses its operational assets effectively deploy capital long-term value
29 NON-FINANCIAL KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
NON-FINANCIAL KEY
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
13%
Components
focus on KPIs 2020 92.1
2020 37
stated priorities
in terms of Waste to landfill (tonnes) Why this is important
Packaging
Reduced by
Our overriding commitment in the workplace is the
our customers, health, safety and welfare of our employees and all
36.2%
communities 2020 97.1 those who visit Essentra’s operations. Our aim is to
be in the top quartile of manufacturing companies
and people. 2019 96.6
for the lowest Incident Frequency Rates.
2018 95.6 (2020 vs 2019)
Number of days lost
150%
2020 99.1
2019 855
2019 98.5
2018 987
2018 98.5
(2019: 8 2020: 20)
77%
High levels of employee
engagement maintained,
keeping us ahead of the
global and manufacturing
People
industry averages
In November we held our second annual results reflect the true voice of Essentra. Our and our plans to build for the future. In 2021
global Safety Week with a focus on “slips, trips overall engagement metric continues to score we will be seeking to strengthen engagement
and falls”. This was an opportunity to reinforce well at 77% (78% last year), this is based on around talent and careers, new ways of
every employee’s role in taking responsibility employees’ views of feeling satisfied, proud working and recognition. All site action plans
for driving improvements and embedding our and wanting to remain at Essentra. This score were agreed by the end of January 2021 and
safety culture throughout the business. keeps us ahead of the manufacturing and regular meetings are scheduled throughout
global benchmark engagement averages the year to track progress.
World-class engagement and balanced well across our internal
In 2020, despite an incredibly challenging demographics, highlighting that our diversity Recognising our people
COVID-19 context, we undertook a slightly and inclusion agenda is proving effective. Our Group-wide “Make It Work” awards are
revised global employee engagement survey. now in their third year and celebrate the
We were able to maintain a market-leading The survey told us that our employees feel people who have gone above and beyond
participation rate of 91% (90% 2019), which particularly positive about working for to deliver what Essentra does best: make it
means we can again be confident that the Essentra, how we responded to the pandemic work. The award categories were adapted
in 2020 to better reflect our new values and
LTI Days lost goals. In 2020 the number of nominations High employee
engagement
Number of % Number of % was close to double those received in 2019
Year lost times change Year lost days change maintained in 2020
77%
and came from all divisions and functions
2018 36 2018 987 across the organisation. Our winners (five
2019 33 2019 855 individuals and one team) were announced in
2020 37* +12% 2020 655* -23% January 2021 and will be recognised in virtual (78% in 2019)
* Excludes 3C! * Excludes 3C! events later in the year. During 2021 we will
also be recognising some of our “COVID
heroes” acknowledging their response to
exceptional circumstances.
Creating a diverse environment Being an ethical employer any such concerns in good faith, without Gender split all employees
In 2020 we progressed our work to create Essentra has established a clear commitment fear of victimisation or retaliation and with
a more diverse and inclusive workplace, to ensuring that its business activities are the support of the Company. Employees can
focusing on the launch of our global health conducted in accordance with all applicable report any concerns on a confidential basis
and wellbeing strategy, Essentra Thrives laws and regulations. The Group Compliance online or by telephone.
which is outlined on page 32. We continued Strategy is based on risk-based policy and
Throughout our international operations we
to embed the global Diversity and Inclusion training protocols supported by appropriate
support and endorse human rights – as set
Policy launched in 2019 and partnerships with technology platforms and expert guidance
down by the United Nations Declaration
organisations such as everywoman, Business and advice. Our Ethics Code is the core
and its applicable International Labour
in the Community (BITC) and #WorkWithMe. foundation of the Group Compliance
Organisation conventions – through the
Strategy and is issued to all employees
We remain committed to providing all active demonstration of our employment
globally, supported by annual training on the
employees with the opportunity to develop policies, our supply chain and the Male: 66.4% (4,691 employees)
Code and positive affirmation statements Female: 33.6% (2,374 employees)
and advance, which includes giving full responsible provision of our products and
by the employees. In addition we have As at 31 December 2020.
and fair consideration to all employment services. This commitment includes a
specific policies relating to Anti-Bribery and
applications from disabled people. In the mandatory requirement on all our sites to
Corruption, Anti-Money Laundering and Third-
event of employees becoming disabled, Party Due Diligence. These policies are made
avoid the employment of children, as well Permanent/contractor
we make every effort to ensure that the available to all employees and specifically
as a commitment to the prevention of split all employees
training, career development and promotion slavery and human trafficking. Our Filters
issued for affirmation to senior leaders and
opportunities available are as far as possible operations based in India, Indonesia and
other employees who hold positions where
identical to those of non-disabled employees. Thailand are additionally accredited to SA
such polices are relevant to ensure best
8000 which details fundamental principles
practice. Further details on these policies can
In 2020 we joined BITC’s Cross-Organisational of human rights.
be found at essentraplc.com/responsibility.
Mentoring Circles for the third year and
as part of the scheme ten Essentra UK- Our Right to Speak Policy and process is
based employees will be participating from well established and enables any employee
January 2021. The Circles aim to support to report circumstances where they believe
the progression and impact of Black, Asian that the standards of the Ethics Code, or the
and Minority Ethnic (BAME) employees and Company’s wider policies and guidance notes,
address their current under-representation at Permanent: 99.9% (7,055 employees)
are not being upheld. We are committed to Contractors: 0.1% (10 employees)
senior levels. ensuring that employees feel able to raise As at 31 December 2020.
35 A WINNING, ENGAGED AND EMPOWERED TEAM CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Onboarding our people • Successfully onboarded new recruits remotely • Global launch of digital onboarding solution
with the right support, during 2020 which will also facilitate further remote
skills, knowledge and • Piloted digital solution to onboarding that onboarding and early engagement
tools to get them off delivers a consistent and manager-led
to a flying start approach
Developing our people • Further roll out of LEAP (Leadership Essentials • Extension of LEAP programme to middle
in their jobs with in Action) Programme for supervisors – managers
opportunities to develop including virtual • Continuation of the Essentra Apprenticeship
skills, experience and • Continuation of the Essentra Apprenticeship programme in the UK
knowledge programme in the UK • Continuation of the Future Leaders
• Continuation of the Future Leaders (Graduate) programme with a new intake expected
programme for 2019 intake and graduation of in autumn 2021
2018 intake
Growing our people • Identified supplier for global Learning • Launch of global LMS which will include
beyond their job, so they Management System (LMS) a digital platform to communicate directly
can thrive and achieve • Upskilled leaders and managers in areas such to employees who do not currently access
their full potential as emotional wellbeing, communications and email or the corporate intranet
change management • Learning available to all employees through
the LMS system
Supporting our people • Major focus in 2020 with support for • Further embed global health and wellbeing
in work and life, by employees through the pandemic strategy and EAP provision to all global
providing flexibility where • Launch of global wellbeing strategy including locations
possible so they can Emotional Support First Aider training • Extend Emotional Support First Aider
achieve their goals • Extension of Employee Assistance Programme training globally
(EAP) provision to all global locations
Leaving in a positive • Recognised 2020 was a difficult market • Global launch of digital approach to
way that is consistent and provided appropriate support for onboarding will include “offboarding”
and fair, showing dignity leavers with wider use of outplacement
and respect whatever and local connections
the situation
36 CLASS-LEADING SUSTAINABILITY ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
CLASS-LEADING
SUSTAINABILITY
Our Sustainability Strategy
As part of our revised purpose In 2020, we undertook our first comprehensive
as a responsible business and materiality assessment, invested in the Responsible Resource Usage Reducing our impact on the environment
development of more sustainable products, through waste reduction projects, driving
our Building for the Future set ambitious targets for the future and made sites to zero waste to landfill, trials of recycled
strategic roadmap, we have good progress towards those targets. and biodegradable materials and trials of
“closed loop” business models in partnership
set ourselves the goal of During the year we re-confirmed the focus
with suppliers and customers
“class-leading sustainability”. of our sustainability strategy around four
We made significant progress pillars. We have mapped the relevant
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to Energy and Climate Change Reducing Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas
on our sustainability journey (GHG) emissions via energy efficiency (eg
these four pillars, with nine goals having a
in 2020, across several fronts. strong and direct link to Essentra’s business.
roll-out of LED projects across multiple sites),
on-site energy generation (eg biomass for
We acknowledge that this is a journey and heating in Filters, four sites at pilot stage
to achieve these goals by 2030, we will look for solar PV in Packaging) and procurement
to further collaborate with stakeholders on of certified renewable energy
a local and global basis to ensure that all
challenges are overcome effectively.
People and Community Ensuring we support the communities
we operate in through our community
engagement policy – each site chooses and
actively supports one or more local initiatives.
Continued focus on improving our health and
safety performance for employees and visitors
Environmental, social and governance Responsible Supply Chain Ensuring our supply chain is robust through
(ESG) topics are crucial to our ability to ongoing improvements in policies and
effectively build for the future as well standards including new KYS processes as
as meeting the increasing expectations part of BPR project, along with roll-out of
of all our stakeholders, including a risk-based supplier audit programme
employees, customers and investors. In
2020 we focussed on communicating our
strategy and targets for environmental
sustainability. In 2021 we will look to
further codify, embed and communicate
social and governance aspects.
37 CLASS-LEADING SUSTAINABILITY CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Product innovation
across Essentra
Sustainability has been a key driver for
innovation across Essentra with each division
working with key stakeholders including
customers, to improve their product and
packaging portfolios. Throughout 2020, many Voluntary Disclosures and Signatories
We acknowledge the important role of sustainable product initiatives were explored,
the Taskforce for Climate Related Financial including the introduction of recycled plastic
Essentra is committed to reporting against voluntary
Disclosures (TCFD) to improve transparency into our Components product ranges, more
external indices to increase transparency, motivate
and drive improvements across industry. sustainable secondary packaging for beauty
stakeholders and drive change within our business
We have disclosed on the four areas of brands and biodegradable cigarette filters.
and the value chain.
Governance, Strategy, Risk Management
and Metrics and continue to endeavour to Growth through innovation on page 42
Our disclosure scores help to drive ambition within the
increase the level of disclosure year on year. and Operational Review on page 67
organisation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and
directly relate to measuring the Energy and Climate
We are working and reviewing TCFD Change pillar of our sustainability strategy.
requirements as part of our risk management
approach to ensure we are managing climate
change risks. The Group Risk Committee
oversee this process, ensuring we are
fulfilling our obligations under TCFD.
Very high
end-of-life disposal & physical health, Resource Usage
assessment, through a structured process that was overseen safety & wellbeing
Brand Reputation nergy and
E
by an external consultant. The assessment has helped to esponsible use of
R Climate Change
atural
N
set priorities for the business through the identification environment, plastics including eople and
P
and evaluation of ESG and wider sustainability issues. including marine single-use Community
ecosystems ustainable
S Responsible
Product Innovation Supply Chain
As part of the process, we identified key stakeholders such
hanges in
C anufacturing
M limate action
C
as customers, industry bodies and sustainability organisations environmental waste streams including
and researched the key sustainability issues that matter legislation/ reparedness
P greenhouse gases
to them. The key issues identified are weighted on both regulation against natural & (Scope 1, 2 & 3) &
T raceability human disasters use of clean energy
importance to Essentra and stakeholders and Essentra’s
& responsible Transparency iversity &
D
level of influence or control over the issue. Importance to stakeholders material inclusion including
procurement Ethical supply chain gender gap
Initially the topics were plotted for each business division and
Community ircular economy
C Employee skill base
then combined to form a Group version that demonstrates Engagement principles mployee
E
the overall focus areas for Essentra. engagement
#1 #2 #3 #4
Per cent
Scope 1 & 2 Number of sites Volume of packaging/raw
GHG emissions at zero waste waste produced material from
(normalised) to landfill (normalised) more sustainable
sources
Environmental targets
and commitments
In August 2020 Essentra announced
stretching environmental KPIs and targets, Targets GHG carbon neutral by All sites at zero waste to
20% 20%
2040
representing a significant step forward in the landfill by
2030
advancement of our established sustainability reduction by 2030 of material 2025
agenda and driven by the outputs of (or sooner)
materiality matrices, regulation, customer (or sooner)
feedback and voluntary disclosures.
Measurement and reporting % change Liquid hazardous and non-hazardous waste by destination
between 2019 (cubic metres) 2020
ERM CVS has assured the following Tonnes CO2e 2018 2019 2020 and 2020
Recycling 243
environmental data for 2020: total Scope 1 Scope 1 11,245 10,264 7,603 -26%
and total Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions, Recovery 519
Scope 2 65,852 62,111 55,327 -11%
total waste volumes by destination, total Incineration 89
Total 77,097 72,375 62,930 -13%
water usage and the number of sites that Landfill 141
Total CO2 eq per
have achieved Zero Waste to Landfill (ZWTL) £m revenue 75.2 74.3 70.2 -5.5 % liquid waste diverted from landfill 86
status. Full details of the scope, activities,
limitations and conclusions of ERM CVS’ Tonnes Tonnes Water usage (cubic metres) 2020
assurance engagement are included in Breakdown of of CO2e of CO2e Water usage 166,301
Energy (MWh) 2019 2020 2019 2020
their Assurance Statement on page 150.
UK 22,040 19,392 7,685 4,789 1. Boundary: Energy, water, and solid and liquid waste data by destination is collected
Electricity for all global operations including manufacturing, warehouses, and offices across
Global 140,454 137,457 62,111 55,327
Essentra. The sites included within the emissions, energy use, water and waste
Renewable UK 19,652 16,577 0 0 reporting are those that constitute 99% of Essentra’s electricity consumption
Electricity within the operational control. The sites which collectively make up the lowest 1%
Procured Global 19,652 16,577 0 0 of electricity consumption are excluded from reporting and the scope of external
assurance due to their consumption being immaterial.
UK 23,852 11,166 4,831 2,241
Natural Gas 2. As defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, Scope 1 includes direct emissions from
Global 44,960 30,209 9,107 6,119 the combustion of fossil fuels at operations within Essentra’s operational control.
Emissions from the use of refrigerant gases have not been included in our reported
UK 8 0 2 0
Scope 1 emissions. Scope 2 includes the indirect emissions from purchased electricity
Diesel Global 2,467 3,696 606 908 used by the organisation.
3. Emission factors: The emission factors used to calculate the Scope 2 emissions for
UK 33 20 7 5
2020 from purchased electricity are those published by the International Energy
LPG Global 376 420 83 96 Agency (IEA 2019) by country. The Greenhouse Gas Protocol 2017 emission factors
have been used to calculate Scope 1 emissions.
UK 1,156 457 262 228 4. Calculations: We collect all data on a monthly basis in our HSE reporting
Fuel oil Global 2,070 2,124 469 481 management system, Enabler and use this as the basis for all calculations. We have
followed the Greenhouse Gas Protocol methodology to calculate figures for tonnes
of CO2 equivalent. Diesel, LPG and fuel oil consumption is measured in litres and
Solid hazardous and non-hazardous waste 2019 converted to MWh.
destinations (tonnes) 2018 (restated)5 2020 5. Restating of data: 2019 solid non-hazardous and hazardous waste data has been
restated for Recycling and Recovery due to corrections of previously reported data.
Recycling 20,404 28,775 31773
Recovery 2007 3043 3415
Incineration 284 596
Landfill 4958 2989 1907
% solid waste diverted from landfill 82 92 95
42 GROWTH THROUGH INNOVATION ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Foundations
for success
At Essentra we have been
1 2 3
Creating and Establishing a
collaborating with our customers Building the right robust process with
embedding an
on innovation for some time, capabilities to drive appropriate targets
innovation
for example by creating more innovation and KPIs
mindset
sustainable products to meet the
changing needs of customers and
broader stakeholders. We currently
have many approaches to driving
In 2020 we introduced “Growth Clearly if our people are expected to help At Essentra we currently have many
growth through innovation, from
through Innovation” as a strategic build and embed an innovation culture approaches to driving growth through
light touch initiatives such as
goal for the company. This has set out they need to understand more about the innovation, and in 2020 have established
workshops through to a number
a clear ambition from the top of the key success factors for innovation and the foundations of a more robust
of accelerated projects where we
organisation and ensures that innovation develop the skills to sustain it. We also process to manage a healthy pipeline
invest more heavily in customer
is embedded throughout the purpose need to be more focused on innovation of innovation activities with appropriate
research and partner with
and vision of our company. capabilities when hiring new recruits targets and KPIs.
customers. In 2020 we looked to
into Essentra. Our goal is to have diverse
formalise some of our work around
Our goal is to build a consistent culture teams focused on innovation where In 2019 we developed a clear
innovation, consciously building
of innovation that incorporates, all employees are supported to drive decision gate process in our Filters
the right foundations to ensure
encourages and promotes collaboration, innovation activities, not just those with division and this is being expanded for
continued success.
diversity, flexibility and agility. It should specific innovation deliverables. use in other divisions. This process allows
also embrace creativity as well as risk, for a wide “funnel” of ideas at the early
so that learning is valued as much as In 2020 our Group Management stage through to prototype development
a positive outcome. Role modelling is Committee spent time considering the and assessment of commercial viability
also important so that leaders embody role that each of them play in driving much later on. Throughout the process
an innovation culture and approach. innovation as well as identifying the metrics are set which help measure
In 2020 we created a new Make It Work core skills and capabilities required performance and guide decisions. This
Award category reflecting our strategic across Essentra and began to develop process allows us to ensure tight and
goal of Growth through Innovation the understanding of innovation within consistent project governance and
and in 2021 we will ensuring that our broader global leadership team. We structure resource accordingly.
innovation has a greater prevalence in also incorporated innovation within our
our communication, recognition and competency framework and in 2021 we
reward strategies. will feature innovation more explicitly
within training programmes.
45 FINANCIAL REVIEW ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
FINANCIAL
REVIEW
Quarterly LFL Revenue Trend Trading performance pandemic related issues, partially being offset
Considering the impact of the pandemic, by continued successful pricing management
0
the FY 2020 result for the Group was resilient. and cost control actions. Adjusted operating
–2
Overall, FY 2020 revenue decreased by 8.0% margin dropped by 210bps (200bps at
%age growth
–4
–6 (-6.8% at constant exchange) to £896.5m, constant FX) to 6.9%.
–8 whilst on a LFL basis, revenue decreased by
–10 6.3%. However, in order to fully understand Including amortisation of acquired intangible
–12 LFL Group performance for the FY, progressive assets of £22.6m and a pre-tax charge from
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 quarterly trading needs to be considered, adjusting items of £17.7m, operating profit as
as this gives more clarity on how, over time, reported was £21.7m (2019: £80.0m); prior
the Company became increasingly proficient year included an overall adjusting items credit
at dealing with the impacts and challenges of £15.4m (mainly due to gains on business
of the pandemic. Q1 trading was largely disposals), whilst 2020 has a total charge
unaffected by the pandemic, however with from adjusting items of £17.7m (mainly due
the advent of Q2 and the initial shock from to restructuring costs).
the major global onset of COVID-19, the
Net financial expense
Company experienced its low point in trading
performance during this second quarterly Net finance expense was above the prior year
Lily Liu
Chief Financial Officer
“2020 was an unprecedented period. From thereon, as the year progressed, at £15.7m (2019: £14.5m), this was mainly
driven by adverse FX movements on property
year, in which we have delivered Group revenue on a LFL basis showed a steady
leases in Turkey and Hungary that are
improvement – going from -9.8% in Q2, to
a resilient financial performance. -6.7% in Q3 and finally further improving to denominated in non-local currencies.
A particular highlight for me has -1.0% in Q4.
Tax
been our strong cash generation On an adjusted basis, operating profit was The effective tax rate on underlying profit
and strengthened balance sheet down 29.1% (-27.9% at constant FX) at before tax (before adjusting items) was 19.2%
– which has enabled the Board £62.0m, which was driven in part by the (2019: 19.9%). This reduced tax rate is driven
disposal of various businesses in the prior year by a change in the geographical split of
to recommend resumption (£5.0m of the £24.0m decline), but mainly by profits across the Company.
of dividends.” the volume gearing effect from the revenue
Lily Liu decline, which was exacerbated by temporary
Chief Financial Officer manufacturing inefficiencies caused by
46 FINANCIAL REVIEW CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
£62.0m
Adjusted operating cash flow
On an adjusted basis, net income of £37.4m
was down 36.1% (34.7% at constant FX) and
adjusted basic earnings per share decreased
Adjusted operating cash flow was £76.3m
(2019: £71.8m). This includes an inflow of
net working capital for the year of £6.2m
Net debt at the end of the period was
£210.4m, a £74.0m decrease from 1 January
2020 (including lease liabilities). The overall
£76.3m
by 38.5% (37.2% at constant FX) to 13.1p. On (2019: outflow of £10.3m) and net capital decrease was mainly driven by a combination
a total reported basis, net income of £6.3m expenditure of £44.7m (2019: £56.6m). of the free cash flow generated during
and earnings per share of 1.7p compared to Net capital expenditure equated to 111% the year along with cash raised from the
£41.2m and 14.7p respectively in 2019. (2019: 155%) of the depreciation charge placement of new share capital in the
(including amortisation of non-acquired Company, being netted off against cash
Net working capital intangible assets) for the year of £40.2m paid for the acquisition of 3C! Packaging Inc.
Net working capital is defined as “inventories (2019: £36.4m). Net interest paid was £12.8m and an increase in lease liability movements
plus trade and other receivables less trade (2019: £13.3m) and tax payments were £7.5m (which are driven by a new lease for the
and other payables, adjusted to exclude (2019: £16.5m), due to the aforementioned aforementioned Components Germany
Operating cash
deferred consideration receivable/payable lower profitability levels in the year as well warehouse project along with recently
conversion of 123%.
and interest accruals/capital payables”. as a refund of tax in the US. The inflow in extended leases on our Components
Adjusted free cash flow
respect of pension obligations was £0.9m Turkey and Filters Hungary facilities). The
was £56.9m in 2020,
The decrease in net working capital to (2019: outflow of £1.3m). ratio of net debt to EBITDA including lease
which was 40% higher
£108.1m (2019: £113.8m) was largely due to liabilities was 1.8x (31 December 2019: 2.0x),
than the previous
lower inventory and receivables levels, which Adjusted free cash flow of £56.9m compared whilst excluding lease liabilities was 1.5x
year.
were driven by the reduced trading volumes to £40.7m in FY 2019. (31 December 2019: 1.9x).
combined with a concerted effort by the
Free cash flow reconciliation
Company to implement a series of initiatives
£m
Balance sheet
Adjusted operating profit 62.0
to adapt and optimise working capital As at the end of 2020, the Company had
levels, in light of the pandemic. These lower Non-cash/other items 52.8
shareholders’ funds attributable to Essentra
Operational Review inventory and receivables were netted off by Net working capital 6.2 equity holders of £617.8m (2019: £533.1m).
on page 67 a decrease in trade and other payables. It Net capital expenditure (44.7) Total capital invested in the business was
should also be noted that an element of the Adjusted operating cash flow 76.3 £942.6m (2019: £919.5m).
year-on-year reduction in overall net working Tax paid (7.5)
capital is attributable to FX impact. Net interest paid (12.8) This finances non-current assets of
Pension obligations 0.9 £868.6m (2019: £841.8m), of which £263.0m
Adjusted free cash flow 56.9
(2019: £276.0m) is tangible fixed assets, the
remainder being intangible assets, right-of-use
assets, deferred tax assets, retirement benefit
assets and long-term receivables.
47 FINANCIAL REVIEW CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
A strengthened balance
sheet reflected in a net
debt to EBITDA ratio
improvement (excluding
lease liabilities) from 1.9x
in 2019 to 1.5x in 2020.
The Company has net working capital of presence and suitable credit rating. Refinancing activities reviewed the overall dividend payment for this
£108.1m (2019: £113.8m), current provisions Essentra monitors the credit ratings of One of the main sources of funding for financial year and taking into consideration:
of £5.5m (2019: £3.3m) and long-term its counterparties and credit exposure the Company is a Revolving Credit Facility the resilient financial performance of 2020, the
liabilities other than borrowings of to each counterparty. (RCF) provided by a group of eight highly- Company’s stronger balance sheet position,
£142.5m (2019: £128.3m). rated banks, which as at the year end was and the encouraging outlook, concluded that
Foreign exchange risk set to mature in its entirety in November there should be resumption of a payment for
Pensions The majority of Essentra’s net assets 2022. However, for a tranche involving five the FY 2020 final dividend of 3.3p per share
As at 31 December 2020, the Company’s are in currencies other than sterling. The of the eight banks (worth £225m), we have (to be paid in June 2021). The dividend payment
IAS 19 net pension liability was £23.9m Company’s normal policy is to limit the recently agreed an extension to the facility being proposed is to be funded in full from
(2019: £17.4m). This increase in the liability translation exposure and the resulting impact based on new terms, which will now mature cash flows generated from the operations
is a result of an actuarial loss (driven by a on shareholders’ funds by borrowing in in November 2023. The Company continues of the Company during 2020. Going forwards,
reduction in discount rate) being netted off those currencies in which the Company has to review its financing, including the lenders a progressive dividend policy will be adopted.
against a positive return of plan assets. significant net assets. As at 31 December in the original tranche still set to mature in
2020, Essentra’s US dollar-denominated assets November 2022. Finance team update
Treasury policies and controls were approximately 27% hedged by its US The Tax and Treasury teams at Group Head
Essentra has a centralised treasury function dollar-denominated borrowings, and its euro- Fundraise in 2020 Office have been brought together to form
to control external borrowing and manage denominated assets were approximately 32% On 18 September 2020, the Company one combined function.
exchange risk. Treasury policies are approved hedged by its euro-denominated borrowings. successfully completed the placing and
by the Board and cover the nature of the Lily Liu
subscription of new ordinary shares in the
The majority of Essentra’s transactions are Chief Financial Officer
exposure to be hedged, the types of financial Company. In aggregate, the fundraise
carried out in the functional currencies of 5 March 2021
investments that may be employed and comprised of 38,461,538 new ordinary shares,
the criteria for investing and borrowing its operations, and therefore transaction raising net proceeds of £96.7m. This fundraise
cash. The Company uses derivatives only exposure is limited. However, where such enabled the acquisition of 3C! Packaging, Inc.
to manage foreign currency and interest exposure does occur, Essentra uses forward and helped reduce the Company’s leverage
rate risk arising from underlying business foreign currency contracts to hedge its ratio to within target range of 1x-2x, providing
activities. No transactions of a speculative exposure to movements in exchange rates on the platform for further strategic optionality.
nature are undertaken. its highly probable forecast foreign currency
sales and purchases over a period of up to Dividends
Underlying policy assumptions and activities 18 months.
Earlier in the year, in light of the
are reviewed by the Treasury Committee. unprecedented uncertainty due to the
Controls over exposure changes and Aside from foreign exchange risk, the Group is
also exposed to other types of risks, including pandemic, the Company announced that
transaction authenticity are in place, and the Board had concluded that all reasonable
dealings are restricted to those banks with credit risk. Please see note 19 to the Financial
Statements for further details. steps should be taken to conserve cash and,
the relevant combination of geographical accordingly, decided to cancel the 2019 final
and 2020 interim dividend. The Board has since
48 ALTERNATIVE PERFORMANCE MEASURES ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
ALTERNATIVE
PERFORMANCE
MEASURES
FY 2020 results at a glance
Management uses a number FY 2020 FY 2019 % change % change Like-for-like basis
The term “like-for-like” describes the
of measures of financial
£m £m Actual FX Constant FX
the income statement. In addition, the non-GAAP measures Operating profit – adjusted 62.0 87.5
description previously used for adjusting The following tables are presented by Depreciation and amortisation of non-acquired intangible assets 52.2 47.7
items has been changed from “exceptional way of reconciling the metrics which Share option expense/other movements 0.6 3.5
and other adjusting items” to “adjusting management uses to evaluate the Change in working capital 6.2 (10.3)
items”, whilst its scope and definition Essentra Group to GAAP measures. Net capital expenditure (excluding disposal proceeds relating to adjusting
remains unchanged. items) (44.7) (56.6)
Operating cash flow – adjusted 76.3 71.8
Constant exchange, like-for-like and
Tax* (7.5) (16.5)
adjusted measures are provided to reflect
Cash outflow in respect of adjusting items (11.1) (34.2)
the underlying performance of Essentra. For
Pension obligations 0.9 (1.3)
further details on the performance metrics
used by Essentra, please refer to page 27. Add back: net capital expenditure (excluding disposal proceeds relating
to adjusting items) 44.7 56.6
Net cash inflow from operating activities – continuing operations 103.3 76.4
Divisional performance
Operating cash flow – adjusted 76.3 71.8
The revenue and adjusted operating
profit for each division is stated before the Tax* (7.5) (16.5)
elimination of inter-segment revenue and Net interest paid (12.8) (13.3)
the cost of central services, as reconciled Pension obligations 0.9 (1.3)
to the reported results set out in note 1 on
Free cash flow – adjusted – continuing operations 56.9 40.7
pages 165 to 167.
* Tax paid excludes the tax paid on business disposals. This is included within the cash outflow in respect
of adjusting items
50 RISK MANAGEMENT REPORT ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
RISK
We continue to closely monitor the impact
of the COVID-19 pandemic on our Principal
Risks and have been taking steps to
Identify Board
Facilitators
• Establish the process for identifying Group Assurance Overall responsibility for assessing the Company’s Principal Risks, setting risk appetite and
and understanding key business risks monitoring risk management performance and the framework.
Divisional Risk
• Identify risks in each of our businesses MANAGE IDENTIFY Champions
and enabling functions
Enabling Function
• Risk reviews with senior leadership Risk Champions
• Review Principal, Key and Emerging Group Risk Committee (GRC) Audit and Risk
Risks REPORT ASSESS Direct and Chaired by the Chief Executive and comprised of the Group Committee
Assess monitor Management Committee members and other key enabling Responsible for
• Prioritise risks through agreed ranking Report function resources, the GRC is responsible for monitoring key reviewing the
CONTROL
criteria risks and ensuring the effectiveness of divisional and functional effectiveness of
risk management. the Group’s risk
• Risk appetite set by the Board for all
management
Principal Risks
systems and
Control The process for identifying,
processes.
• Ownership defined assessing and controlling material
business risks is designed to Divisional Enabling Group
• Establish key control processes and
manage, rather than eliminate. Leadership Teams Functions Compliance
practices
Each leadership Leadership Teams Committee
• Controls to manage the risk within
team is responsible Enabling functions (GCC)
appetite
for ensuring their are responsible The GCC directs
• Monitor the operation of the controls divisional risks are for identifying and oversees
• Tracking progress of mitigation captured and are and mitigating the Group’s
initiatives being effectively risks within their implementation
mitigated within own functions of compliance
Report
business as usual – applicable programs, policies
• Agree and implement measurement
processes. Risk to Finance, and procedures
and reporting standards
management is a Operations, required to meet
• Communicate with all stakeholders standing agenda Strategy, IT, legal, compliance
Manage item for leadership Human Resources and regulatory
• Review all aspects of the Company’s team meetings. and Legal, Risk and requirements.
risk profile Governance.
• Review and challenge risk
management practices
Business Units
Specific business units or sites within each division are developing
and implementing their own risk registers, risk and action owners.
Management are responsible for managing local level risk and reporting
to the respective leadership teams.
52 RISK MANAGEMENT REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Risk categories
The Company has considered the risks
it is facing under the following four risk
category headings and has identified 12
Principal Risks.
and societies. The successful adoption of a risk management at the core of the senior Our risk management framework continues
External
Risks relating to the macroeconomic
new working model, based around social management agenda. We are committed to to evolve in line with best practice to ensure
climate, political events, competitive
distancing requirements, workspace and office managing risks in a proactive and effective that it supports the Company’s growth and
pressures or regulatory issues.
transformations, augmented work schedules, manner to protect and enhance value, and strategic objectives. A robust, but flexible,
reduced travel and continued remote working provide assurance to the Board and our approach to the management of risk is
will require careful planning and successful stakeholders. fundamental to the continued success of the Strategic
change management to ensure a transition Company. In 2020 the challenges presented Internal risks that may impede
which provides opportunity and benefit for We have continued to make good progress by the COVID-19 pandemic included achievement of strategic goals.
our business and our people as opposed to in improving our risk management processes relocation of staff, remote working and
a threat to our operations and the wellbeing of in 2020 as we continue to ensure our risk temporary inaccessibility of some business Operational
our employees. management processes are aligned with FTSE locations. A clear focus was placed on Risks that could impact day-to-day
250 upper quartile practice. This included a accommodating new ways of working and operations and prevent business-as-
Whilst COVID-19 has taken the majority number of initiatives to drive enhanced risk ensuring the continued operation of our risk usual activities.
of the headlines in 2020, it has also been reporting and further embed risk activities management framework. Through regular
important for us to continue to scan the to improve risk culture across the Company. discussions and virtual workshops with all Disruptive
horizon for additional new, emerging or Particular focus was placed on assigning divisional and enabling function leadership Risks that could impact the business
disruptive risks which could significantly responsibility and accountability for Principal teams, we ensured clear accountability for the model or viability of the Company.
impact the Company’s ability to meet its and Emerging Risks, particularly those identification, assessment, and mitigation of
Although key disruptive risks have been
strategic growth objectives. Despite the focus risks that cut across divisions and enabling risks throughout the Company.
identified and mitigated by the Company,
on mitigating the impacts of COVID-19, we functions. The approach continues to be
Risk can present itself in many forms and has none of them are considered to be
have paid close attention to the increasing adopted from ISO 31000 Risk Management
the potential to impact health and safety, the Principal Risks currently.
momentum associated with the risk agendas guidelines and includes a RACI (responsible,
for ESG and climate change (see Class leading accountable, consult and inform) matrix to environment, our community, our reputation,
sustainability on page 36), whilst the potential drive clear responsibility and accountability. regulatory compliance, market and financial
impacts of international trade deals and the performance and therefore the achievement
US election results have also been on our risk Risk management framework of our corporate purpose. By understanding
radar during the year. and managing risk, we provide greater
There is a risk management framework
certainty and confidence to our shareholders,
for identifying and managing risk within
Risk management approach employees, customers, suppliers, and the
defined appetite levels, in relation to both
communities in which we operate.
Our risk management activities aim to operations and strategy. The framework
drive performance aligned to our purpose, has been designed to provide the Group The Board confirms its risk appetite biannually
encourage growth through innovation and Risk Committee (GRC) and the Board with a by mapping its Principal Risks against a
support the achievement of our strategic clear line of sight over risk and to enable sliding scale from “risk-averse” to “risk-
objectives (as set out in the Growth through informed decision-making. neutral” to “risk-tolerant” and this informs the
innovation section on page 42). In doing development of mitigating actions for each of
this, we take a balanced approach that puts the Principal Risks.
53 RISK MANAGEMENT REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Principal Risks
At a strategic level, our risk management roles and responsibilities for those risks that
objectives are to: cut across divisions and enabling functions.
Principal Risks were subject to deep dives 12
• identify the Company’s significant risks and during the year at Board and GRC meetings
appropriate mitigating actions using a standard reporting template. This
• formulate the risk appetite and ensure that enabled consistency of risk reporting across
our business profile and plans are consistent the Company.
with it
Impact
3 3 5
6 5
• ensure that growth plans are properly In 2021 we will build on lessons learnt from 7
At half year we disclosed the following Since our half year disclosure we standing attendees are the Group Health, compliance with risk management processes
key changes: undertook further review of risk profile Safety and Environment Director and the and the adequacy of risk management
and do not believe there has been Group Financial Controller. Other members activities related to the Company’s operations.
• One new Principal Risk, Exposure any further change the impact or of senior management are also invited to
to the Cyclical Industrial Market likelihood assessments of our Principal present reports on risk activities. We also The divisional and enabling functions
(Components division), was Risk profiles. A key change since our welcomed external presentations from subject leadership teams undertake regular reviews
identified to capture the risk that half year disclosure includes: matter experts on topics including ESG and during the course of the year and engage in
changes to the Components sustainability. The Chair of the Audit and Risk facilitated discussions with Group Assurance
division cost base and business • Removal of Climate Change risk Committee has a standing invite to attend to consider the risk environment for their
model do not happen quickly as an Emerging Risk. We have all GRC meetings and receives copies of the particular functional or geographic area of
enough or are not robust enough elevated the profile of this risk and minutes of every meeting. responsibility and how these could impact
to minimise the impact on considered it as part of our wider on the achievement of the Company’s
operating margins as a result ESG Principal Risk. Please refer to The GRC’s responsibility is to focus and strategic objectives.
of cyclical downturns in global the detailed Principal Risk disclosure co-ordinate risk management activities
industrial production. which details the initiatives being throughout the Company and to facilitate Principal Risks
• Geopolitical Risk was removed undertaken in this area including the appropriate identification, evaluation, The GRC has responsibility for overseeing
as an Emerging Risk and fulfilment our obligations under mitigation and management of all key Essentra’s Principal Risks. Our Risk
incorporated within the Macro- TCFD requirements. business risks. In addition, the GRC reviews the Management approach in relation to
economic and Trade Deal risk appetite and ongoing risk management COVID-19 has been to consider the
Uncertainty Principal Risk. approach, and makes recommendations on completeness and appropriateness of our
risk appetite to the Board and actions required Principal Risks. Whilst COVID-19 has not
• An additional Emerging Risk in
to ensure adequate controls and mitigating been identified as a standalone Principal
relation to the changing structure
actions are in place against identified key risks. Risk, we have considered its impact on each
of the debt market was identified.
of our Principal Risks and our risk appetite.
• The likelihood assessment of six As an important part of fulfilling its Where necessary we have identified suitable
Principal Risks was increased: responsibilities the Board receives regular mitigating actions. A top-down and a
PR3 Delivery of Strategic reporting from the Chief Executive in his capacity bottom-up assessment is undertaken to
Projects, PR5 Cyber Attack, PR7 as GRC Chairman to enable the Board to identify our Principal Risks. The assessment
Business Continuity Planning and challenge and review the GRC’s views on key risks. is performed against the four risk categories.
Management, PR8 Environmental,
Social and Governance, PR9 The Audit and Risk Committee (ARC) engages As part of the bottom-up process, the
Internal Processes and Control and directly with the divisions and the enabling divisional and enabling functions leadership
PR10 Safety, Health and Wellbeing. functions, including deep dive reviews, as part teams have also undertaken a detailed risk
The impact assessment of PR7 of fulfilling its oversight responsibilities on the assessment, facilitated by Group Assurance
Business Continuity Planning and risk management processes. The ARC, with using a consistent workshop methodology,
Management was also increased. assistance from Group Assurance, oversees the outputs of which were reflected in
55 RISK MANAGEMENT REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Emerging Risks
updated risk registers. These risk registers were
then analysed to ensure completeness and Emerging Risk Owner Risk description Controls
appropriateness of the Principal Risks. Regulatory Company Essentra is a global company that must comply We remain alert to longer-term regulatory
change Secretary and with regulatory requirements in many countries. developments including those related to single
As part of our top-down process, an updated General Counsel Regulation is increasing worldwide and may use plastics and tobacco-related and tobacco-
assessment was completed for each Principal potentially impact our products, operations, alternative products.
Risk by the GRC. This top-down assessment workforce and relationships with suppliers, The Company’s Legal, Risk and Governance
customers and stakeholders. team continuously monitors changes in
required each GRC risk owner to provide analysis
on material changes in the risk they manage COVID-19 has significantly impacted supply chains regulations and emerging good practice seeking
and whether they consider it to have more or and the working environment, potentially leading to external support or guidance as necessary.
new or additional areas of regulatory scrutiny and Strengthening of internal divisional resources to
less impact during the course of the year on
subsequent regulatory change. identify market and product changes and any
achievement of our strategic objectives.
potential associated regulatory requirements.
These individual responses were consolidated, Technology Chief Information The risk that Essentra does not manage its response We continue to monitor and review
the GRC then discussed and reached a disruptors Officer to evolving technologies effectively. This may include developments in the external market through
consensus regarding Principal Risks that losing competitive advantage as rivals deploy our networks. This includes innovation and
can seriously affect the performance, future advanced manufacturing technologies, artificial futures sessions with existing suppliers. We are
intelligence and robotics to strengthen product also involved in a range of external technical
prospects or reputation of Essentra. The outputs
development, marketing, production, distribution focus groups.
from the GRC assessments were then presented and support functions.
to the Board for approval along with the
Evolving Chief Financial The debt market is evolving, and the lending We remain alert to the change in investors’
recommendation of Principal Risks to be included
conditions Officer condition and appetite can be impacted by key appetite and we continue to respond to this
in the longer term viability (LTVS) testing. of the Debt events, we have recently observed the effect from and maintain our profile in the debt market.
Market the COVID pandemic. Essentra continues to have The treasury team monitors changes in the
The Board believes the Principal Risks are strong liquidity and we will stay alert to the change debt markets and is in regular contact with
specific to Essentra and reflect the risk of investors’ appetite and respond optimally to it banks inside of the Essentra bank group and
profile of the Company at the current time. and maintain our profile in the debt market. other financial institutions to ensure that we
All Principal Risks are managed within their have the widest variety of market options
individual risk appetite. As a result, the 12 that are available.
Principal Risks are a combination of one new,
as disclosed at half year, and 11 previously
disclosed risks.
The evaluation is based on plausible worst Emerging Risks have the potential to increase future prospects or reputation of Essentra.
case scenarios. in significance and affect the performance The outputs from the GRC assessments were
of the Company and as such are continually presented to the Board for approval along with
To make this evaluation, the estimated monitored through our existing risk the recommendation to develop appropriate
Emerging Risks and wider
financial impact of each Principal Risk management processes described on page response strategies.
key risks have been identified
crystallising was considered. The Board and 110. Our risk management process ensures
and are being monitored by
GRC assessed the potential impact on the Emerging Risks are identified and aids the We have created a list of Emerging Risks to be
the Company. Mitigation
actions in response to such Company’s viability, based on selected severe GRC and the Board’s assessment of whether reviewed on a regular basis at the GRC and
risks are an important part plausible risk scenarios. These were developed the Company is adequately prepared for Board level as set out page 55.
of the divisional and enabling in conjunction with senior management. The the potential opportunities and threats
functions risk reporting to the Principal Risks that were considered to have a The GRC and the Board have undertaken a
they present.
GRC and Board. potentially significant impact on the Company’s rigorous assessment of Emerging Risks during
viability are included in the Long-Term Viability The process enables new and changing risks 2020 and have established procedures to
Statement on page 148. to be identified at an early stage so we can closely monitor Emerging Risks on an ongoing
analyse them thoroughly and assess any basis including:
In addition to the Principal Risks, Emerging potential exposure.
• the GRC’s terms of reference require it
Risks and wider key risks have been identified
We undertake a top-down and a bottom- to review the Group’s ability to identify
and are being monitored by the Company.
up assessment to identify Emerging Risks. Emerging Risks
Mitigation actions in response to such risks are
Risk management workshops for divisional • Emerging Risks is a standing agenda item at
an important part of the divisional and enabling
and enabling functions leadership teams each GRC meeting and each Emerging Risk
functions risk reporting to the GRC and Board.
were facilitated by the Group Assurance will be subject to a deep dive
Emerging Risks function this year, to provide a bottom-up • external specialist input will be sought where
view of Emerging Risks. These workshops required
We define Emerging Risk as a changing risk or • identified Emerging Risks have been
include discussion of potential Emerging Risks
a novel combination of risks for which there assigned an owner who is both a GRC and
based on externally sourced Emerging Risk
is no track record or previous experience by GMC member. The Emerging Risk owner
data. The Company’s potential exposure is
which the impact, likelihood or costs can be is responsible for providing an update on
assessed against the Board’s approved risk
understood. Its potential impact is viewed as the development of Emerging Risks and
measurement criteria. The process enables new
being two years or more in the future. activities in response at each meeting.
and changing risks to be identified at an early
We strongly believe that identification and stage so we can analyse them thoroughly and
The Board can confirm that it has completed a
appropriate challenge to the management assess potential exposure.
robust assessment of the Company’s Principal,
and mitigation of Emerging Risks is critical to The preliminary view on Emerging Risks were Key and Emerging Risks. We continue our focus
our long-term success. consolidated and discussed by the GRC to on ensuring the adequate mitigation of risks
reach a consensus regarding Emerging Risks faced by the Company to ensure alignment
that can seriously affect the performance, with the Board-approved risk appetite.
57 RISK MANAGEMENT REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Strategic Risk
Strategic Risk
Strategic Risk
Change in risk level Ownership Relevance Change in risk level Ownership Relevance
Unchanged Company Secretary Industry general Increased Chief Information Industry general
and General Counsel Officer
External Risk
Change in risk level Ownership Relevance Over the past few years,
Unchanged Group Programme Director Industry general the Company conducted a
thorough review of Brexit risks
Description Mitigation Brexit and implemented a series
As a global business, changes to global economic Essentra has an international customer base Over the past few years, the Company of changes to minimise raw
conditions or trading arrangements have the which dilutes the effect of downturns in specific conducted a thorough review of Brexit risks and material and finished product
potential to impact us. Our international trade geographies. The economic environment is implemented a series of changes to minimise raw flows across the EU-UK border,
flows expose the Company to tariffs, duties or constantly monitored as part of our business material and finished product flows across the and to mitigate the associated
quotas imposed through trade sanctions and planning cycle and budgeting, enabling a degree EU-UK border, and to mitigate the associated risks including supply chain
also to macroeconomic effects due to regional or of forward planning in the event of a period of risks including supply chain disruption and to disruption.
global industrial output changes. economic instability. This is performed in close co- ensure the appropriate customs processes and
ordination with each division to pinpoint trends procedures are in place to allow for effective and
Essentra will need to adapt to geopolitical
likely to impact our individual business activities. efficient flow of goods and materials between
changes that impact on patterns of trade and
the UK and the EU. We continue to work with our
the movement of labour and capital. A trend The annual budgets that result from the planning
supply chain partners to minimise disruption and
towards protectionism, regionalism and a process are a control, against which monthly
ensure flow of goods across the EU-UK border.
rebalancing from West to East creates risks and results are monitored, surfacing any effects of
opportunities that Essentra will need to manage economic instability and informing commercial
and exploit. decision-making. Movements in currency can
In light of the Trade and Co-operation Agreement have positive and negative impacts on the
being agreed between the UK and the EU, our Company’s reported earnings. This is managed
Brexit focus has moved to continuing to ensure through proactive hedging of currency exposures.
we are following robust customs and shipment The Board also considers potential impacts of
processes and proactive management of goods specific macroeconomic events, including the
across the UK-EU border, to minimise delays to UK’s decision to leave the EU. The breadth of the
our customers, and our working capital. Company’s portfolio and its diversification across
markets, geographies and products provides
some natural mitigations of potential impacts.
Our divisions consider the wider economic
situation in their strategies as part of the
budgeting and strategic planning process.
62 RISK MANAGEMENT REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Business Continuity Planning and Management Exposure to the Cyclical Industrial Market (Components Division)
Change in risk level Ownership Relevance Change in risk level Ownership Relevance
Increased Group Programme Industry general Year on year Components Division Company Specific
Director New risk in 2020 as Managing Director
disclosed at half year
Description Mitigation
We operate a global manufacturing footprint The Company continues to review and refresh its Description Mitigation
and supply chain. Making this supply chain business continuity management and planning The Components division serves industrial OEM Key mitigating actions being undertaken to
resilient is a critical factor in serving our frameworks and processes. customers and hence, is exposed to overall protect the division from future industrial
customers, to minimise the impact of potential Industrial Production trends. Global Industrial declines include the following:
Mitigating factors that the Company has in
disruptions. Production has tended to be cyclical in nature • Optimising our fixed cost base such that it is a
place for single location issues include:
with major economic downturns leading to a lower proportion of operating costs
Business continuity management issues can • leveraging our global manufacturing footprint downturn in Industrial Production. From the
be focused on particular locations, driven by to provide alternative manufacturing locations The Components division undertakes continuous
Global Financial Crisis in 2008-2009 to the
single point supply chain failures. Here, our • fire and other risk prevention systems review of its operating footprint to optimise
current COVID-19 crisis, economic cycles have
global footprint provides risk diversification, via • assessing and managing operational risks via manufacturing and distribution cost to serve.
impacted demand in the broad industrial
alternative manufacturing routes. the enterprise risk management process Our new distribution facility in Nettetal, Germany
market.
Equally, business continuity issues can be • ensuring comprehensive maintenance plans provides an opportunity for this as we leverage
The Components division sells to a broad base delivery network capabilities to reduce our
broader in nature and impact a number of sites are in place for key manufacturing equipment,
of key end markets including Automotive, distribution footprint while delivering enhanced
simultaneously as has been the potential with and/or alternative manufacturing routes are
Capital Goods and Electronics. This broad base service level to our customers.
COVID-19. Our global footprint may expose us to identified
of customers provides some risk diversification,
a broader set of potential multi-site disruption • maintaining an insurance programme and Our increased investment in the automation of
however, future downturns in Industrial
risks, than more focused companies. working closely with our insurers, FM Global, to production and distribution activities enabled by
Production are almost certain to happen, albeit
Robust business continuity planning and ensure complete and comprehensive cover to robotics will further help to reduce fixed costs.
with an uncertain timeframe.
management practices are required to minimise prevent losses. • Increased variability of our cost base
The Components division can make changes to
the impact on production capability, supply Additional measures to mitigate against multi- We also undertake reviews of how better to
its cost base and business model to maintain
chain management, customer relationships, site issues include: manage labour, striking the right balance between
operating margins against fluctuations in
reputation, revenue and profit. • enhancing our multi-site capabilities and permanent and temporary employees, so that we
demand. The risk is that such changes do not
The Company experienced some minor disruption manufacturing flexibility happen quickly enough, or are not robust enough are able to effectively manage our cost base.
through COVID-19 related issues, during 2020. The • identifying alternative sources of supply for key to minimise the impact on operating margins. • Diversification across the market sectors we
vast majority of sites remained operational, with raw materials and supply guarantees where sell to; both within the industrial sector and
a small number of sites temporarily shut due to necessary and feasible also beyond it
government imposed lockdowns. • global, standard site/network assessment
approaches for pandemic and other issues. We have introduced a category management
approach focusing on faster growing and resilient
During 2021 the company will work with our markets. We continue to explore entry opportunities
insurers to model the potential impact of in new markets to further mitigate this risk.
climate change
• Innovation
We continue to exploit our innovation capabilities
to secure new opportunities and diversify with
the use of new materials in the event of future
restrictions on the use of plastics.
63 RISK MANAGEMENT REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Strategic Risk
Operational Risk
Operational Risk
Strategic Risk
COMPONENTS:
CONTINUATION OF OUR
DIGITAL JOURNEY
Our markets
Revenue
£255.0m
(2019: £283.3m)
A leading global
manufacturer and
Automotive Equipment
Manufacturing
Fabrication Electronics Construction Retail POP/
Paper and Board
What we measure
Adjusted operating profit1
distributor of a
comprehensive range
£45.5m of components, used 82k
(2019: 93k)
45
(2019: 41)
92.1%
(2019: 94.3%)
14
(2019: 13)
(2019: £60.3m)
in diverse industrial
Adjusted operating margin1
applications and Active customers Net Promoter Score On Time and In Full Lost Time Incidents
17.8%
Why we measure it Why we measure it Why we measure it Why we measure it
end-markets. Reflects marketing Reflects our customers’ Demonstrates the Indicates our overriding
effectiveness and overall satisfaction ability to meet delivery commitment to health,
(2019: 21.3%) measures the potential with our products demand safety and welfare in
1 Excluding amortisation of acquired population for further and service, as well as the workplace
intangible assets and adjusting items. How we have done
growth opportunities loyalty to our brand Though our sites How we have done
How we have done How we have done remained operational Number of incidents
Reduction impacted The increase of 4 points throughout the remained high, however
Scott Fawcett by macroeconomics in is reflective of the year, OTIF fell due to we did see a significant
Managing Director addition to continued continued roll-out of reductions in stock reduction in severity as
Components focus on mid-sized the new websites and of levels being exposed we continue to focus
customers remaining operational as demand improved on improving the safety
throughout a very faster than expected culture across the
challenging year through H2, coupled division
with labour shortages in
the US and operational
onboarding challenges
with the new German
Hub warehouse
68 OPERATIONAL REVIEW | COMPONENTS CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Commenced operations
at European Automated
Warehouse in Germany,
providing platform
for improved service levels
and reduction in cost to serve
across mainland Europe.
PACKAGING:
DEEPENED CUSTOMER
RELATIONSHIPS
Our markets
Revenue
£363.2m
(2019: £352.7m)
One of very few
multicontinental
Pharmaceutical Personal Care
and Beauty
What we measure1
Adjusted operating profit1
suppliers of a
full secondary
£13.8m packaging range to 97.3%
(2019: 96.6%)
30%
(decrease
15
(2019: 18)
(2019: £15.1m)
the pharmaceutical, vs 2019)
3.8%
complaints
beauty sectors.
Why we measure it Why we measure it
Drives performance Why we measure it Measures the
of quality systems Drives performance of opportunity cost
(2019: 4.3%) and service delivery of incidents in the
quality systems and
1 Excluding amortisation of acquired workplace
How we have done service delivery
intangible assets and adjusting items.
Improved OTIF through How we have done How we have done
enhanced planning and Improved quality Improved safety
scheduling coupled with through enhanced through broader
Iain Percival using our network of defect root cause engagement from our
Managing Director plants more efficiently analysis and corrective teams in identifying
Packaging actions and fixing hazards
1 All measures are presented before they become a
on a LFL basis
risk to an employee’s
safety
72 OPERATIONAL REVIEW | PACKAGING CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
2020 Review
Market trends and dynamics
Progress made in 2020
In 2020 total prescription volumes have We expect the market to return to
2020 saw a further year of operational contracted by an estimated 3% in the moderate growth in the second half of
progress with quality and service both USA and 2.8% across the EU5 which 2021, with the healthcare systems having
improving on 2019 on a LFL basis with 30% is unprecedented in a market that to catch up on the significant backlog of
fewer quality complaints and OTIF at 97.3%, delivered constant growth over a decade. elective surgeries, chronic diseases and
all achieved whilst coping with the immense Prescription drugs demand went down cancer diagnostic and treatments. The
operational and logistical challenges of the significantly driven by the reduction of pandemic has shown our customers the
pandemic. Organisational strength has patient visits to General Practitioners, and importance of working with suppliers
been significantly improved by targeted with the hospitals focusing their activity that can offer a robust supply network,
on COVID-19 treatments, stopping elective business continuity plans, and the ability
recruitment and use of existing talent
surgeries and other non-critical activities. to maintain high levels of service and
development processes. We have also built quality despite the challenging environment
capabilities in supply chain management, The demand for vaccines experienced a
significant slow-down in Q2 2020 with – an area where Essentra Packaging has
continuous improvement and procurement delivered excellent metrics in 2020. This
vaccination campaigns being put on hold,
which have supported improved service, and has started to rebound at the end of resulted in a number of supply contracts
efficiency and cost optimisation. 2020, with an increase expected in 2021 being signed before the end of 2020.
with the supply of COVID-19 vaccines. The beauty market, which is more reactive
Despite the pandemic impacting our markets than healthcare, was severely impacted at
Some market segments like Over The
through reduced prescriptions and fewer Counter (OTC) drugs experienced significant the beginning of the pandemic (some of our
elective surgeries, the division continued to growth during the pandemic, spiking in key customers reduced demand by 30% over
support customers through 2020, indeed Q2 2020, but this did not offset the overall a few months) but rebounded in Q3 and is
Awarded “Packaging many directly involved in the fight against lower demand for healthcare products. returning progressively to pre-COVID-19 run
News” 2020 UK COVID-19. This support is evidenced in the rates for Q1 2021. This market is undergoing
Packaging Company results of our Customer Survey in which we a significant transformation driven by
of the Year. consumers expecting more sustainable
scored 8.1 out of 10 against last year’s 7.9
products, this will generate opportunities
and a Packaging industry average of 7.6. to win share positioning, with the right
offering and approach.
A major highlight of the year was the value
enhancing acquisition of 3C! Packaging,
in September. Integration activities are
progressing well with delivery of early
procurement synergies and growth pipeline
opportunities being progressed.
74 OPERATIONAL REVIEW | PACKAGING CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
FILTERS:
LEVERAGING INNOVATION
FOR SUSTAINABILITY
Our markets
Revenue
£278.3m
(2019: £303.6m)
The only global
independent
Tobacco Food and
Beverage
What we measure
Adjusted operating profit1
provider of filters
and related solutions
£25.2m to the tobacco 99.1%
(2019: 98.5%)
9%
(reduction
11%
(reduction
2
(2019: 2)
(2019: £36.2m)
industry. vs 2019) vs 2019)
Adjusted operating margin1 On Time and In Full1 Quality complaints Waste1 Lost Time Incidents2
9.1%
Why we measure it per billion rods1 Why we measure it Why we measure it
Demonstrates the Why we measure it Drives productivity and Indicates our overriding
ability to meet delivery Demonstrates the the efficient use of commitment to health,
(2019: 11.9%) demands materials safety and welfare in
ability to meet quality
1 Excluding amortisation of acquired the workplace
How we have done demands How we have done
intangible assets and adjusting items.
Maintained world-class How we have done Significant reduction How we have done
service performance; Maintained world-class of 11% in waste vs 2019 Health and safety
improved planning and service performance following a reduction of is always our first
Kamal Taneja increased flexibility 30% in 2019 vs 2018 priority, we are proud
Managing Director underpin performance to maintain our high
Filters standards of safety
despite the challenges
1 Measures presented for
Core Filters business only
presented by the
excluding Tear Tapes pandemic
2 Presented for total division
Including Tear Tapes
76 OPERATIONAL REVIEW | FILTERS CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Focused innovation
Revenue by segment Who we are and what we do investment culminated in
development of proprietary
We provide outsourced filter sustainable filters in 2020.
manufacturing services for the tobacco
industry and solutions to enhance the
open/close functionality of packaging
whilst also informing and protecting
the contents.
2020 Review
Market trends and dynamics
Progress made in 2020
Historically market decline (excluding The EU SUPD has catalysed the
In 2020 our overall operational performance China) has been 3-5%, however, various requirement for more sustainable
continued to improve, with some good trading updates from tobacco companies alternatives to the standard, cellulose
improvements in KPI metrics, thanks to a in 2020 have shown volume declines in acetate filter and the majority of resources
focus on a reduction in lead time and the excess of this. In the short term customers are now focused in either this area or
establishment of a Commercial Excellence also paused any significant new product alternative products (eg THP).
team that is contributing to a much stronger introductions (NPIs) and have increased For our Tapes business the pandemic has
key account management process. focus on costs. driven an increase in online purchases,
According to Euromonitor the growth hence significantly increasing opportunities
In relation to the division’s game changers, rate for cigarettes globally is -3.7%, within the paper and board segment.
the two previously announced outsourcing although strong growth is forecast in next Conversely, within the food and beverage
contracts are now operational, with full generation products (16.8% for THP and segment, cost focus has led to tapes being
production capacity being achieved on 3.1% for E-cigarettes). de-specified on a number of accounts.
both of these. Additionally during the year, China remains a significant growth
the division also won another outsourcing opportunity, accounting for c.45% of
contract with an independent customer. cigarette volumes in 2019 and an increasing
demand for special filters. Our China
joint venture provides a great platform to
The China JV remains on track to commence
capture the many opportunities available
production towards the end of Q2 2021,
in the world’s largest tobacco market.
providing a great platform to capture the
Plans on track many opportunities available in the world’s
to establish a largest tobacco market.
manufacturing
facility for China Joint
We continue to build our pipeline of next
Venture towards the
end of Q2 2021.
generation products (NGP) opportunities
– with one further patent application
made, one proprietary product launch and
joint developments ongoing with several
partners. The division also has a number
of ongoing projects collaborating with
customers and suppliers on biodegradable
filters. As previously reported, in December
78 OPERATIONAL REVIEW | FILTERS CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Paul Forman Lily Liu Scott Fawcett Iain Percival Kamal Taneja
Chief Executive Chief Financial Officer Managing Director, Managing Director, Managing Director,
Further details on Paul’s skills and Further details on Lily’s skills Components Packaging Filters
experience can be found on page 83. and experience can be found Scott Fawcett joined Essentra in Iain Percival joined Essentra as Kamal Taneja joined Essentra
on page 83. 2010 as Managing Director of the Managing Director, Essentra as Managing Director, Essentra
European Components business, and Packaging in 2017, before which he Filters in 2017 from Amcor Tobacco
was appointed divisional Managing was divisional CEO, Beverage Cans Packaging, where he worked as Vice
Director in January 2014. Prior to Europe for Rexam plc. Prior to this, President and General Manager,
joining Essentra, Scott was Head of Iain held a number of increasingly based in Singapore. Prior to this,
eCommerce at Electrocomponents senior roles at Rexam plc, Toyota Kamal held increasingly senior
plc, where he held a variety of Motor – Europe Manufacturing roles at Ingersoll Rand and Trane,
increasingly senior sales, marketing and Dowty Group, and has and has extensive marketing,
and eCommerce positions during extensive experience in category commercial, operational and supply
his 17-year career there. management, manufacturing and chain optimisation experience
supply chain optimisation. throughout the Asia Pacific region.
80 GROUP MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Enabling Functions
Richard Cammish Oshin Cassidy Kathrina FitzGerald Jon Green Nick Pennell
Chief Information Officer Group Human Resources Director Strategy and Company Secretary Group Programme Director
Richard Cammish joined Essentra Oshin Cassidy joined Essentra as Commercial Director and General Counsel Nick Pennell joined Essentra
as Chief Information Officer in June Group Human Resources Director Kathrina FitzGerald was appointed Jon Green joined Essentra and was as Group Operations Director
2017. Prior to this he was Group Chief in January 2019. Prior to joining as Strategy and Commercial Director appointed Company Secretary and in 2017 and became Group
Information Officer for Coats plc. Essentra, Oshin was Group Human in January 2018. Prior to joining General Counsel in July 2005. Prior Programme Director in January
During his career, Richard has gained Resources Director at Imagination Essentra, Kathrina worked with to joining Essentra, Jon worked as an 2021, reflecting the importance of
extensive IT, digital and international Technologies, and has extensive DMGT plc – a portfolio of information in-house lawyer for a number of large programme delivery to achieving
experience in organisations including human resources experience and media businesses – where she international businesses, including Essentra’s strategic objectives.
Heineken, Cadbury, British American having previously held senior roles held a number of increasingly senior Hays plc and Unilever plc. Jon is a Prior to joining Essentra Nick was
Tobacco and Mars. He has also at global organisations including roles during her ten-year tenure, qualified solicitor. Chairman of Lavery/Pennell and a
worked for a leading management Securitas, ComfortDelGro, Centrica including Business Development Partner at Booz Allen Hamilton/
consultancy and in a technology and QinetiQ. Director, Managing Director of Booz and Co. in the UK and China.
start-up business. DMGT International and Director of Nick has extensive experience
Strategy and Development. Kathrina of performance improvement,
started her career at JP Morgan, operational and strategy
where she spent seven years in development projects gained across
investment banking. the industrial and energy sectors,
and in many geographies.
81 CHAIRMAN’S CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Directors’
report
82 CHAIRMAN’S CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
CHAIRMAN’S CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE STATEMENT
The Board holds corporate governance This is our second year reporting on Section 172 Another key area of focus is the progress
Dear Shareholder and its principles in the highest regard and
believes that good governance should be at
(1) Companies Act 2006, and with feedback
on the first year of S172 reporting available, we
made in the compliance transformation
programme which has had particular regard
the heart of all its decisions and discussions. have increased our disclosures in this area to to the impact of the Deferred Prosecution
On behalf of the Board, The 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code explain how we have engaged our stakeholders Agreement requirements. The programme is
I am pleased to present (2018 Code) and its principles has continued and to describe the outcomes. Our statement headed up by our Company Secretary and
the Corporate Governance to apply throughout the year and supported on Section 172 and stakeholder engagement General Counsel, Jon Green. He has been
our discussions and decision making with can be found on pages 23 to 26. determined that COVID-19 should have
Report for the year ended openness, integrity and accountability at limited impact on this important programme
31 December 2020. the forefront of our minds. The Board has It has been a challenging and busy year: the and has made good progress in raising
reviewed its operations and governance Board met weekly for much of 2020 and awareness across the Group.
framework and confirms that, as at the date received regular updates between meetings
of this Report, the Company has complied on the four priorities of employee physical and Finally, you will read that our AGM will be live
with the provisions set out in the 2018 Code, emotional wellbeing, continued high levels streamed which will allow more shareholders
other than the two points reported in more of customer support, cash conservation and to join us. We propose adopting new Articles
detail on page 85. building for our future. This was initiated and of Association that will allow us to hold hybrid
replicated at GMC which ensured we were AGMs in future years. We believe this will
The Corporate Governance Report that well placed to respond to both UK and other increase our opportunity to engage with you
follows sets out and explains the processes government announcing new COVID-19 rules. and we hope you will join us virtually at our
in place which are essential for delivery AGM this year. More details can be found in
of long-term success. We have provided Throughout the year the Board ensured it the Notice of Annual General Meeting.
additional information wherever possible so remained focused on its other key areas of
that our shareholders and other stakeholders responsibilities too and the report that follows Paul Lester, CBE
who may read this report are able to gain a outlines the activities of the Board. As a Board Chairman
we found working remotely stretched our 5 March 2021
deeper understanding of how we approach
governance. Information required to be dynamics and we agreed to bring forward our
reported under the Directors’ Report is Board evaluation so that we could examine
reported both here and within the Strategic and understand the impact of remote
Report and cross-references have been meetings on the Board dynamic. We made
provided throughout to signpost this. initial enhancements to our governance
arrangements in early 2020 including the
appointment of a Head of Governance who
has ensured we have run efficiently.
83 BOARD OF DIRECTORS ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Committee membership key
1 Audit and Risk Committee 4 Sustainability Committee
2 Nomination Committee 5 Committee Chairman
Experienced, effective and diverse leadership – Our Business is led by our Board of Directors, 3 Remuneration Committee
biographical details of the Directors are available at essentraplc.com/about-us/board-of-directors
Appointed to the Board: Appointed to the Board: Appointed to the Board: Appointed to the Board:
December 2015 January 2017 November 2018 April 2015
Skills and experience: Skills and experience: Skills and experience: Skills and experience:
Following his appointment to the Board in As Chief Executive Paul combines strong Lily joined Essentra as Chief Financial Officer in Previously Tommy was Chief Executive of DCC
December 2015, Paul was made Non-Executive commercial and operational leadership 2018, before which she was CFO of Xaar Plc Group, Plc, an international sales, marketing, distribution
Chairman in May 2016. Paul brings a wealth of with a detailed understanding of company a FTSE listed inkjet technology developer and and support services group, headquartered in
experience to Essentra, gained in increasingly rationalisation, as well as growth through manufacturer of industrial inkjet printheads. Prior Dublin and with operations in 13 countries. Tommy
senior operational and strategic executive roles, acquisition, development and delivery of a clear to this, Lily was CFO, Smiths Detection at Smiths has significant experience relevant to Essentra,
and has also served on a number of Boards in a vision and corporate strategy. Prior to joining Group Plc, and has 20 years of experience in the in particular of growing diverse businesses both
Non-Executive capacity for more than 20 years. Essentra, Paul was Group Chief Executive of Coats manufacturing and engineering sectors. organically and via acquisition during his 30 year
Group plc – the world’s leading industrial thread career with DCC.
Other current appointments: Lily began her career with a Chinese investment
manufacturer – for seven years. Previously Paul
• Non-Executive Chairman, McCarthy & Stone plc firm before emigrating to Australia to complete an Other current appointments:
held a number of increasingly senior operational
• Non-Executive Chairman, Ready Power Rail MBA, and she has worked across three continents • Non-Executive Director and Chairman
and strategic positions at a variety of companies,
Services Group Limited, First Port Limited, (Asia, Europe and Australia). Designate, Homeserve plc
and has a proven track record of international
Appello Limited and Marley Limited. • Non-Executive Chairman, Lota View
manufacturing experience at the highest level. Other current appointments:
Past appointments: Holdings Limited
None
• Chief Executive, VT Group plc and Graseby plc, Other current appointments: • Executive Director, W&R Barnett Limited
• Chairman of John Laing Infrastructure • Non-Executive Director and Senior Independent
Fund, Greenergy, Forterra plc and Knight Director, Tate & Lyle plc
Square Holdings
• Group Managing Director, Balfour Beatty plc
President of the Society of Maritime Industries the
BSA and the Engineering Employers Federation
84 BOARD OF DIRECTORS CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 4
Appointed to the Board: Appointed to the Board: Appointed to the Board: Appointed to the Board:
June 2019 July 2017 June 2017 Secretary to the Board in July 2005
Skills and experience: Skills and experience: Skills and experience: Skills and experience:
Nicki brings extensive advisory experience to Mary is currently Non-Executive Director and Based in Germany, Ralf is currently an independent Jon Green joined Essentra in March 2005, and was
Essentra, having provided Board level counsel to Chair of the Audit Committee of global media consultant and a senior adviser to private appointed Company Secretary & General Counsel in
many UK and international businesses over more internet company Travelzoo – a US-listed publisher equity firms. He is an advisor to the Board of Elif July 2005. Jon is a qualified solicitor and heads the
than 25 years. Nicki has been a Partner of Deloitte of travel, entertainment and local offers and Packaging, and a Non-Executive Director for the Legal, Risk & Governance team. His responsibilities
LLP and led the Deloitte “Women on Boards” of Mitie Group plc, a facilities management Shepherd Building Group Board. He is a Non- extend to include legal, compliance and risk
programme, as well as teaching a number of company. She is a Non-Executive Director of Executive Director of Huhtamaki Oyj (a Nasdaq management together with the delivery of the
programmes for Non-Executive Directors. Nicki is Gemfields Group Limited, a world-leading supplier Helsinki-listed global food packaging company). internal audit programme. Prior to joining Essentra,
a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of responsibly sourced gemstones. Mary brings a He is a former member of Amcor Limited’s Jon worked as an in-house lawyer for a number of
and a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of wealth of accounting, finance and international Global Executive Team and former President of large international businesses, including Hays plc
Personnel Development. Nicki combines her management experience to Essentra, having the business group Amcor Flexibles Asia Pacific and Unilever plc
Board work with advice on senior executive career previously been a Partner of Deloitte LLP for more (Packaging Solutions).
strategy and development. than 20 years, as well as serving on a number of
Ralf brings much experience to Essentra from his
Boards in a Non-Executive capacity since 2000.
Other current appointments: time spent in senior executive positions at leading
• Partner, Stork & May. Other current appointments: global packaging companies across Europe, the
• Non-Executive Director and Chair of the Americas and Asia.
Audit Committee, Travelzoo
Other current appointments:
• Non-Executive Director and Chair of the
• Non-Executive Director, AptarGroup, Inc.,
Audit Committee, Mitie Group plc
• Non- Executive Director, Huhtamäki Oyj
• Non-Executive Director, Gemfields
• Non-Executive Director, Shepherd Building
Group Limited
Group Limited;
• Adviser to the Board, Elif Packaging
85 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
The Board can confirm that it has complied adopted by the organisation in drafting the Our people Audit, Risk and
with the Provisions as set out in the 2018 UK Annual Report, which requires Group-wide Pages 31 to 35 internal control
Corporate Governance Code (the “Code”), co-ordination and review. That process runs Pages 105 to 112
other than: alongside the formal audit of the Financial
Statements conducted by the External Auditor.
• Provision 36 of the Code on post-
employment shareholding but which The Board further takes into account
is included in the proposed Directors’ representations made by management
Reward Policy which is subject to a vote and the views of the internal and external
by shareholders at the AGM in May 2021 auditors as to the integrity of the narrative
• Provision 38 of the Code on pension and financial statements. The comprehensive
contribution rates, which the Company review process carried out initially by the ARC
is working towards and will be fully and then Board, is used by the Board who
effective for Executive Directors from has determined that the 2020 Annual Report,
1 Jan 2023 onwards. taken as a whole presents a fair, balanced
and understandable position and provides
shareholders with the information necessary Board meetings during the year
The Corporate Governance Report reflects the
pillars of the Code. Some of the information to assess the performance, strategy and Meetings during the year
required by the Code is included in the business model of the Company. Paul Lester, Non-Executive Chairman 8 (8)
Strategic Report and is cross-referenced here Paul Forman, Chief Executive
to avoid unnecessary duplication. Leadership and accountability 8 (8)
understandable the Board has the support the long-term sustainable success of the 1 Lorraine Trainer retired from the Board on 21 May 2020. Figures in brackets denote the maximum number of
of the ARC, which makes recommendations Company taking into account the interests meetings that could have been attended. The Company Secretary and General Counsel acts as Secretary to
the Board and is supported by the Head of Governance who attends all the meetings.
to it on this and also considers the process of all stakeholders.
86 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Our structure
ESSENTRA PURPOSE,
VALUES AND CULTURE
Safety,
respect and
diversity
The Board’s agenda is set by Strategy Financial Operational and Risk Governance and Ethics Leadership and People
the Chairman and carefully • Approved changes to the • Received regular reports from • Received updates from the • Received weekly updates
• Approved the Company’s
planned, in conjunction with Company’s strategic roadmap the Chief Executive and the Board Employee Champions during the peak of COVID-19
trading statements, full year
the Company Secretary and that sets out the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and agreed a framework for on the safety and wellbeing of
and half year results and
General Counsel, and with purpose, values and goals • Received detailed virtual visits our people
quarterly trading statements
the support of the Head of • Approved the equity raise presentations from senior • Undertook the annual • Monitored performance and
• Received weekly financial
Governance, to ensure that • Approved the acquisition of management across the acquisition integration review continued development of
reports on cash management
appropriate time is given to 3C! businesses and considered • Participated in two externally Health and Safety risk and at
and performance in response
managing the affairs of the • Held a virtual strategy session reports from enabling facilitated Board evaluation, each meeting assessed Health
to the potential impact of
Company. This ensures focus with GMC members, approved functional management review of the conclusions and and Safety performance
COVID-19
on the Company’s strategic the business plan supported about matters of material agreement on subsequent • Reviewed of the annual
• Approved the Group budget
activities and key monitoring by an in depth-review of each importance to the Company action plans employee engagement
for 2021
activities as well as reviewing divisional strategy • Undertook a considered • Received feedback from survey results.
• Cancelled the 2019 final
significant issues so that • Received regular strategy review of each Principal an external review on the
dividend in order to preserve
matters are considered in update sessions Risk and Emerging Risk and quality and balance of Board
cash in light of uncertainties
line with the schedule of • Received regular updates approved the introduction agendas and papers
faced by the global pandemic
reserved matters. An annual on progress of the Business of a new Principal Risk and • Reviewed and approved
• Approval of major capital
cycle of agenda items is in Process Redesign project. Emerging Risk gender pay reporting
and operating expenditure
place to support the work • Received regular updates • Reviewed and approved
proposals
of the Board. on progress of the Business the annual Modern Slavery
• Review of refinancing
In addition to scheduled Board proposals. Process Review project Statement
meetings, the Board met on a • Review of risk strategy and • Received updates on the
weekly basis for part of 2020 risk appetite outcome of sanctioned
to receive updates on the four • Continued consideration market compliance failures in
priorities set following the of Brexit implications and the Filters business
outbreak of the pandemic. mitigating strategies • Review of the Company’s
These four priorities are • Continued consideration of Right to Speak claims and
reported on in more detail cyber security risk. ensuring arrangements
at pages 17 and 18. are proportionate and
independent
• Received updated training on
the Market Abuse Regulation.
89 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Principal decisions
Principal decisions are defined as both those Principal decision 1 Principal decision 2 Principal decision 3
that are material to the Company, but also Equity Raise Acquisition of 3C! Cash Preservation
those that are significant to any of our key
stakeholder groups. For more detail on our key • The Board agreed to place new ordinary shares • The Board approved the acquisition of 3C! as • The Board decided that due to the uncertainty
stakeholder groups see page 23. In making up to a value of £97m (net of costs) to raise the acquisition met the Company’s strategic that COVID-19 had presented to consider
the following principal decisions the Board additional equity and financial criteria, by creating significant measures available to preserve cash to maintain
considered the views of its key stakeholders, as • Each of the Directors chose to subscribe for new value, strengthening the Company’s customer the best position possible
well as the need to maintain a reputation for shares, and in total, directors subscribed for proposition and offering significant synergies • The Board discussed and agreed that
high standards of business conduct and the £230k of new shares • The Board considered its stakeholders in cancellation of the 2019 full year dividend would
need to act fairly between the members of the • An accelerated bookbuild process was used by reaching this decision and concluded that the support its approach to cash preservation
Company. the brokers, however the Board were conscious acquisition would be a positive opportunity during the COVID-19 period and also agreed to
that other retail investors, including staff may • The Board also considered the implications for not declare a HY2020 interim dividend
want the opportunity to participate in the the Packaging division and agreed that it would • The Board recognised the importance of
equity fundraise and agreed an offer should be strengthen the Packaging division’s position dividends to all shareholders but believed this
made on the PrimaryBid platform to enable as with its key customers in the US pharmaceutical was a responsible action to take to conserve
many investors to participate as possible sector cash during a period of uncertainty
• The Board agreed that £50m of the net • The Board considered additionally that the • The Board also recognised that the need to
proceeds of the equity raise would be used to acquisition would create a North Carolina hub preserve cash was important for the long-
acquire 3C! whilst the additional amount raised providing the Packaging division with greater term success of the business and all of its
would be used to strengthen the Company’s strength for future growth which would benefit stakeholders
balance sheet and to give the Company staff, customers and suppliers. • The Board keeps dividend payments under
flexibility to pursue other compelling strategic review.
opportunities as and when they arise
• The Board agreed that the reasons for their
decision ensured the Company retained
financial strength which would in the long term
benefit of a variety of stakeholders including
shareholders, staff, customers and suppliers.
90 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
BOARD EMPLOYEE
ENGAGEMENT
During 2020, the Board Champions, Mary Positive feedback has been received by
Reilly and Ralf Wunderlich continued to both our people and the Board. Whilst the
engage with staff throughout the Essentra sessions are confidential, Mary and Ralf,
family. The Board both enjoy hearing from with the support of the Future Leaders,
Mary and Ralf and are committed to the have started to track whether there are
Voice of the Employee initiative. any themes in order that they can be
addressed as they think appropriate.
The Board have made a commitment to:
In addition to Voice of the Employee
• receive updates at every meeting sessions, Mary joined a number of team
• review themes and to engage management meetings across the businesses so that she
as appropriate where the Board have any could speak with people directly to hear
concerns for herself how they were managing to
• review formal employee feedback for work remotely and to provide colleagues
themes that may be raised directly with with an opportunity to raise any concerns
people in the sessions to ascertain their with her. Unfortunately, it was not possible
view on those matters to replicate this with staff working on the
shop floor due to our own COVID-19 safety
A schedule of visits had been agreed for 2020 measures and therefore during 2021 the
but as it became apparent that Mary and Voice of the Employee sessions will focus
Ralf would not be able to visit in person, an on reaching out to a wider group of staff to
alternative framework was created to ensure ensure they have the same opportunity to
that the Board still heard from people directly. provide their feedback.
The framework uses virtual meetings and
sessions are facilitated by the Future Leaders The Board look forward to further feedback
who have worked with Mary, Ralf and the over the course of 2021.
Head of Governance, to deliver Voice of the
Employee sessions.
91 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Q&A WITH
RALF WUNDERLICH
The Role of the Board Champion “It is great for the What are your reflections on your
first full year as a Board Champion?
• The role was introduced • The Board attaches high Board to hear I was so pleased to become a Board
following the introduction of importance to employee Champion and join Mary in this very
the requirement for employee engagement and want to directly about what important role. Mary and I had worked on
engagement in the 2018 UK
Corporate Governance Code
engage with staff to deepen
their understanding of matters the most – great plan to engage with many of our people
and intended to visit sites and had a planned
Q&A
people have an opportunity for what our people consider to be Ralf K. Wunderlich disappointing to have to accept we would not
direct contact with the Champions the greatest risks as well hear Non-Executive Director reach as many staff as would have done if we
about the positive side of work for had visited a site. However, we have now got
• The Board is keen to hear and Essentra a good structure around our virtual meetings
understand the views of employees and we are sure that as lockdown continues,
and the impact that Board • The Board Employee Champion we will be better prepared and able to meet
decisions have on the workforce is not an HR position – it is to staff in 2021 and hopefully by the second half
listen to our family members and of 2021 some in-person meetings are possible.
• The Champions represent the make sure they have a voice that
employee views and consider how is heard directly by the Board What have you enjoyed most
the decisions taken by the Board so they can calibrate messages about the role?
will impact the workforce. It is not that management and the I enjoy meeting our people and hearing
a spokesperson for the Company engagement survey tell us about what matters to our people. Safety is
in front of employees, more an
our number one priority and a paramount
employee spokesperson in front • Details of discussions remain
concern for the Board, and by talking with
of the Board anonymous but the Champions
staff it is obvious that it is indeed everybody’s
report back to the Board at
number one priority. I really enjoy people
every meeting
talking to me about what Essentra means to
them, and how they feel about working for
Q&A
92 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
DIVISION OF
RESPONSIBILITIES
The roles of the Chairman and the Chief ensuring that rigorous financial controls and
Executive are separately held and are so systems of risk management are maintained
defined as to ensure a clear separation of as appropriate to the needs of the businesses
responsibilities. The Chairman leads the within Essentra.
Board and ensures its effectiveness, and
the Chief Executive is responsible for the The Senior Independent Director (SID) can
Non-Executive Directors provide executive management and performance be contacted via the Company’s registered
an independent view in Board of Essentra’s operations. office. During the year, this role was held by
discussions and in the development Tommy Breen, and upon his retirement, the
of the Company’s strategy. The Board considers that, for the year ended role will pass to Mary Reilly in 2021 subject to
31 December 2020, the Non-Executive her re-election as a Non-Executive Director.
Directors were each independent. In making The SID is available to shareholders to discuss
this assessment of independence, the and develop an understanding of their issues
Board considers that the Chairman and and any concerns which cannot be resolved
Non-Executive Directors are independent of by discussions with the Chairman, the Chief
management, and free from business and Executive or Chief Financial Officer, or where
other relationships which could interfere such contact is inappropriate.
with the exercise of independent judgement
now and in the future. The Board believes External commitments
that any shareholdings of the Chairman and The Board is fully aware of current external
Non-Executive Directors serve to align their commitments for all of the Non-Executive
interests with those of shareholders. Directors and is satisfied these do not distract
from the time committed to Essentra.
The Board considers that the Non-Executive Non-Executive Directors are also required to
Directors provide an independent view in discuss any additional external appointments
Board discussions and in the development with the Chairman prior to their acceptance.
of the Company’s strategy. Non-Executive In addition, the time commitments of the
Directors ensure a sound basis for good Chairman are the subject of review by the SID,
corporate governance for the Company, in conjunction with the other Non-Executive
challenging management’s performance and, Directors. The Conflict of Interest register is
in conjunction with the Executive Directors, reviewed at each Board meeting.
94 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
While there were no material changes to the also remains available to meet outside of the forward for re-election on an annual
time commitment of the Chairman during formal meeting schedule. basis. As Tommy Breen has announced
the year, the Board took note of Paul Lester’s his retirement from the Board, he will not
appointment as Chairman of Marley Limited. All of the Board have attended all Board and stand for re-election. The Board, including
The Board concluded that he continues to be Committee meetings this year and with their the Chairman, is satisfied that each of the
able to fully satisfy his obligations to Essentra. commitment to their roles clear, the Board Directors being put forward for re-election
In considering the Chairman’s
In considering the Chairman’s continued time is content that the Non-Executive Directors continues to be independent and effective
continued time commitments to
commitments to the Company, the Non- devote sufficient time to the business of and that their ongoing commitment to the
the Company, the Non-Executive
Executive Directors also viewed positively his Essentra. Executive Directors may accept role is undiminished. The Notice of Meeting
Directors also viewed positively
exemplary attendance record at Essentra, outside appointments, provided that such contains additional information as to the
his exemplary attendance record
ensuring that he was able to attend 100% of appointments do not in any way prejudice recommendations of the Directors’ re-
at Essentra, ensuring that he was
Board and Committee meetings and other the ability to perform their duties on behalf of election.
able to attend 100% of Board and
additional informal meetings with Board Essentra.
Committee meetings.
members throughout the year. The Board The conduct of Board matters
expects this attendance record to continue Paul Forman, Chief Executive, currently During the year, there were eight scheduled
going forward and Paul Lester has given holds one external non-executive position, Board meetings. In addition to these
assurances of his continued commitments to and the Board is of the view that this is scheduled formal meetings, the Board met
the Company. not detrimental to the performance of his weekly for a number of months during the
duties given the time requirements involved first lockdown in the UK and on a number of
During the year Mary Reilly took a role as and that this appointment is beneficial to other occasions as required.
a Non-Executive Director at Gemfields Essentra given Paul’s exposure to another
Limited. This was notified to the Board and business and their response to a wide variety Informal discussions are also held between
Nomination Committee beforehand who of issues. The letters of appointment for the Chairman and the Non-Executive
believe Mary has sufficient time to still fulfil Non-Executive Directors are available for Directors on a regular basis and additionally
her role as Chairman of the ARC and Board review at the Company’s registered office and prior to or post each scheduled Board
Champion. Mary continues to be available to prior to the AGM. With fluctuating COVID-19 meeting. Regular contact is also maintained
meet outside of formal meetings. arrangements in place, please contact with the Chief Executive and with members
CompanySecretary@essentra.com if you wish of the GMC. The SID has also held meetings
Ralf Wunderlich was appointed to Shepherd to view these documents prior to travelling. with Non-Executive Directors without the
Building Group Limited towards the end Chairman present.
of the year and having notified the Board Directors’ elections
and Nomination Committee of this The Company’s Articles of Association
appointment, the Board concluded he still require that all new Directors seek election
had sufficient time for his roles of Chairman to the Board at the AGM following their
of the Sustainability Committee and Board appointment. In compliance with the 2018
Champion. As with Paul Lester and Mary, Ralf Code, all eligible Directors will put themselves
95 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
The Board is supported in its role by Board Operational matters and the responsibility Board paper review
Committees and whilst they are a valuable for the day-to-day management of the In addition to the Board Effectiveness reviews,
part of the Company’s corporate governance businesses are delegated to the Chief as detailed on page 104 of the Nomination
structure, the Board, as a whole, maintains Executive, supported by members of senior Committee report, an externally facilitated
oversight of such important matters executive management as appropriate, review of Board papers was undertaken. The
and, after each Committee meeting, the within delegated authority limits. The support review identified areas of good practice in the
The GMC met virtually several Chairman of the Audit and Risk Committee of the GMC ensures a strong link between quality and content of some Board papers.
times a week during 2020 as it reports on the matters which have been Essentra’s overall corporate strategy and For instance, reports to the Board on cyber
steered the business safely through reviewed. In particular the Board looks to the its implementation within an effective risk were highly commended, and this meant
Covid-19 and intends to meet on a Audit and Risk Committee to undertake the internal control environment and robust the Board were very well cited on the risk and
weekly basis in 2021 until such time majority of the work involved in monitoring risk management. mitigating actions being taken. Other Board
as it is appropriate to reconsider and seeking assurance as to compliance with papers had scope for improvement to reduce
its meeting cadence. the internal controls and risk management Full details of the membership of the GMC
the dependency on appendices and ensure
practices within this structure. can be found on pages 79 and 80.
reports were succinct and clearly set out the
input required from the Board.
Other specific responsibilities are delegated The GMC met virtually several times a week
to the Remuneration, Nomination and during 2020 as it steered the business safely
Applying Essentra’s corporate
Sustainability Committees. The Board through COVID-19 and intends to meet on
responsibility principles
believes that it, and its Committees, have a weekly basis in 2021 until such time as
it is appropriate to reconsider its meeting The Chief Executive is the Director with
the appropriate composition to discharge
cadence. The GMC has adopted a clear primary responsibility for the implementation
their respective duties effectively with
governance framework: agendas are set and integration of Essentra’s corporate
the appropriate level of challenge and
according to the framework and all matters responsibility principles across the Company.
independence, and that the members of the
arising are addressed. Papers are circulated in During 2020, the Group Operations Director
Board in conjunction with the senior executive
advance of the meetings and the CEO makes was responsible for co-ordinating the
teams are well equipped to drive and deliver,
good practice of ensuring views of all GMC operation of detailed policies on health
the Company’s strategic objectives.
are heard. As these behaviours are modelled and safety and the environment, and the
The Board is of the view that it has a highly across the business, it has encouraged Company Secretary and General Counsel
competent Chairman who, together with these practices to be shared across other was responsible for co-ordinating policies on
each of the other Non-Executive Directors, management committees, all of which have ethics, which support Essentra’s commitment
has considerable international experience contributed to continual improvements in to its corporate responsibility principles.
at a senior level in the management of effective corporate governance and timely Further details of these policies can be viewed
activities broadly similar to those carried upward reporting within the Group. on the Company’s website.
out by Essentra and the material issues
likely to arise for the Group.
96 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Shareholder communications be held in future years which will allow votes investment activities. Slide presentations are
The Board recognises the importance of cast electronically to be counted on the day. made immediately available after the full
effective communication, and seeks to The Board support the proposal to amend and half year results, and are also available
maintain open and transparent relationships the Articles and believe this will provide on the Company’s website to view and
with its shareholders and other stakeholders, an increased opportunity for shareholder download. The Company ensures that any Directors, understand
including providers of finance, customers and engagement. The Articles also set out some price-sensitive information is released to all the views and concerns of
suppliers. This is achieved by regular updates minor amendments and the AGM Notice shareholders at the same time, in accordance major shareholders in relation
through public announcements, the corporate explanatory notice sets out the details of with regulatory requirements. During the specifically to their views on
website and other published material. these changes in more detail. year the Chairman, SID, Chairman of the governance and performance of
Remuneration Committee and Chairman the Company against strategy.
All shareholders can meet any of the At the AGM, the level of proxy votes lodged of the Sustainability Committee have held The Chief Executive,
Directors of the Company should they so on each resolution is made available, both independent meetings with shareholders Chief Financial Officer and
wish. In particular, the SID is available to at the meeting and subsequently on the and additionally the Chairman has attended Investor Relations Director have
shareholders should they have concerns or Company’s website. Each substantially meetings with the Chief Executive. At each primary responsibility for
wish to share their views. Feedback from separate issue is presented as a separate Board meeting reports are presented detailing investor relations.
meetings with shareholders is provided resolution, and the Chairmen of the Audit the engagements with shareholders to
regularly to the Board so they are aware of and Risk, Nomination, Remuneration and ensure that the Board as a whole has a clear
any issues or concerns, and ensures that Sustainability Committees are available to understanding of the views of the shareholders.
the Board has a balanced view from major answer questions from shareholders.
investors. Following advice from the UK Financial reporting
The Company also communicates and The Directors have acknowledged, in the
government, the AGM in 2020 was held as
engages regularly with its major institutional Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities
a closed event in order to observe COVID-19
shareholders and ensures that all the set out on page 149, their responsibility for
safety measures and shareholders were
Directors, including the Non-Executive preparing the Financial Statements of the
encouraged to submit questions in advance
Directors, understand the views and concerns Company and the Group. The Directors are
of the meeting. For 2021, the Board will host
of major shareholders in relation specifically to responsible for preparing the Annual Report
both an in-person and virtual AGM so that
their views on governance and performance and Accounts, and they consider that the
the Board can continue to communicate with
of the Company against strategy. The Chief Annual Report and Accounts taken as a whole
all shareholders, including private investors,
Executive, Chief Financial Officer and Investor are fair, balanced and understandable. The
who are provided with the opportunity to put
Relations Director have primary responsibility External Auditor has included a statement
questions to the Directors. Shareholders are
for investor relations. Virtual presentations for about their reporting responsibilities in the
encouraged to attend virtually but will need
analysts and shareholders were held during Independent Auditors‘ Report, set out on
to lodge votes by proxy. The Notice of AGM
the year, and virtual meetings were also pages 210 to 218.
includes a proposal to amend the Articles of
undertaken with key institutional investors to
Association in order that hybrid meetings can
discuss strategy, financial performance and
98 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
The Directors are also responsible for the processes that cover, amongst other matters, • every month, each division submits detailed
publication of half year results, as required by segregation of duties, reporting responsibilities operating and financial reports covering
the Disclosure and Transparency Rules of the and review and approval requirements. The all aspects of performance. These are
Financial Conduct Authority. This provides a Manual prohibits management overrides reviewed by the Chief Financial Officer and
general description of the financial position and the processes set out within the Manual the Group’s central Finance function, and
and performance of the Company and the are also reflected within financial reporting summary reports are communicated to the
In accordance with the 2018 Group during the relevant period. systems and the framework for financial GMC and the Board
Code, the Board acknowledges controls within the Group. A Delegation of • certificates are required from the businesses
its overall responsibility to Internal controls Authority is in place, that is also reviewed and to confirm compliance with the Group’s
shareholders to ensure that an In accordance with the 2018 Code, the Board updated on a regular basis, that identifies policies (including financial) and procedures
adequate system of acknowledges its overall responsibility to approval processes for different matters. The at both the half year and year end.
risk management and internal shareholders to ensure that an adequate Manual is applied across the entire Group and
control is in place. system of risk management and internal supported by a twice yearly confirmations Directors’ and Officers’ insurance
control is in place and for reviewing the from divisional management in relation to In accordance with the Company’s Articles of
effectiveness of this system. Such a system adherence to the Group accounting policies. Association, and to the extent permitted by
can only be designed to mitigate, rather the laws of England and Wales, the Directors
than eliminate, the risk of failure to achieve Further details on the Company’s risk
are granted an indemnity from the Company
business objectives, and can therefore management system and internal controls
in respect of those liabilities incurred as a result
only provide reasonable, and not absolute, can be found on pages 109 and 110.
of their office. In respect of those matters for
assurance against material misstatement which the Directors may not be indemnified,
or loss. This is essential for reliable financial The following enables the Board to review the
effectiveness of the system of internal control the Company maintained a Directors’ and
reporting and also for the effective Officers’ Liability Insurance Policy throughout
management of the Group. and the financial reporting processes:
the year. It is anticipated this policy will be
• the ARC meets regularly and reports to renewed. Neither the Company’s indemnity,
The internal control and risk management nor the insurance policy provide cover, to the
process for financial reporting processes is the Board, no less frequently than at every
Board meeting following an ARC meeting extent that a Director is proven to have acted
documented within the Essentra Accounting dishonestly or fraudulently.
Manual (the “Manual”) that is updated • the terms of reference provide a framework
on a regular basis. The Manual sets out for the ARC to review and oversee the quality,
the procedures and process established for integrity, appropriateness and effectiveness of
internal and external financial reporting the Group’s internal control framework
and incorporates accounting policies that • the Board has met with divisional Managing
are adopted by the Company, as well as Directors as has the ARC, who have
processes and controls relating to tax and discussed with them the internal control
treasury matters. The Manual sets out clear environment at local sites
99 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
• Sets the Board agenda primarily focused • Provides a “sounding board” for the Chairman • Providing constructive challenge to executive
on strategy, performance, value creation, • Serves as an intermediary for the other Directors management
culture, stakeholders and accountability, and when necessary • Bring experience and objectivity to the
ensuring that issues relevant to these areas • Acts as an alternative point of contact for Board’s discussions and decision-making
are reserved for Board decision shareholders where contact through the normal • Monitor the delivery of the Group’s strategy
• Shapes the culture in the Boardroom channels of Chairman, or other Executive against the governance, risk and control
• Encourages Board members to engage in Directors has failed to resolve any concerns, or framework established by the Board
Board and Committee meetings for which such contact is inappropriate • Responsible for evaluating the performance
• Fosters relationships based on trust, mutual • Leads the annual assessment of the of the Chairman, led by the SID
respect and open communication between effectiveness of the Chairman
Non-Executive Directors and the Group
Management Committee
• Develops a working relationship with the
Chief Executive
• Provides guidance and mentoring to new
Directors as appropriate
• Proposes the strategy to the Board and • Lead, direct and oversee all aspects of • Maintains a record of attendance at Board
implements the strategy which has been the finance and accounting functions meetings and Committee meetings
approved by the Board of the Group • Responsible for ensuring good information
• Communicates to the workforce the • Contributes to the development of strategy flows to the Board and its Committees, and
expectations in respect of the Company’s culture and management of the Group’s business between the GMC and the Non-Executive
and for ensuring that operational policies and • Manage relationships with the external auditor Directors
practices drive appropriate behaviour and key financial institutions and advisors • Advises the Board on all regulatory and
• Develops manageable goals and priorities for • Ensure effective internal controls are in corporate governance matters
the management team place and compliance with appropriate • Assists the Chairman in ensuring that
• Leads and motivates the management teams accounting regulations for financial, the Directors have suitably tailored and
• Ensures that the Board is aware of the regulatory and tax reporting detailed induction and ongoing training and
views of the senior management team professional development programmes
on business issues
• Develops proposals to present to the Board
on all areas reserved for its judgement
100 GROUP SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE REPORT ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
GROUP SUSTAINABILITY
COMMITTEE REPORT
Other attendees
During 2020, the Chairman, the SID, the Chief Financial Officer, the Strategy and Commercial Director, the Group
Communications Director and the Group HSE Director were invited to attend every meeting.
Figures in brackets denote the maximum number of meetings that could have been attended. The Committee
Secretary was initially the Group Sustainability Coordinator, and the role has now been passed on to the Head of
Governance.
Lily Liu was appointed as a member of the Sustainability Committee with effect from 1 January 2021.
Ralf Wunderlich
Non-Executive Director
101 GROUP SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Key activities 2020 Embedding sustainability and The Sustainability Committee has contributed
• Approved four sustainability targets for reducing risk to setting targets used by the Remuneration
i) zero waste to landfill sites, ii) total waste Following the first full year of the Sustainability Committee to align remuneration with
production, iii) the percentage of packaging Committee, the increasing focus on sustainability. This has further underpinned
and raw materials from sustainable sources sustainability has ensured the Sustainability the importance and commitment placed
and iv) Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas Committee has been very active in supporting on sustainability.
(GHG) emissions the Group as it has increased its focus in this “As sustainability continues
The Sustainability Committee has also
• Agreed KPIs to support reporting progress area. During the year, we asked our people to gather momentum,
considered how sustainability initiatives and
on the sustainability targets and monitored what mattered to them and their response it is embedded within the
the development of the Group’s sustainability
reporting against those KPIs highlighted how important sustainability organisation that will provide
strategy can reduce and mitigate the
• Reviewed disclosures and the results of the
was to them. This was incorporated into the the greatest impact for the
Principal Risk on Environmental, Social and
Carbon Disclosure Project which has moved
wider strategy and having engaged with staff, environment.”
there was a momentum to continue to seek Governance (ESG) risks. Recommendations
from a ‘C’ to a ‘B’ made by the Committee has helped to
out ideas and initiatives that could be shared
• Reviewed disclosures made under the across the organisation. inform the work of the GMC, divisions and
voluntary Ecovadis index and the progress enabling functions thereby reducing the
made towards improving the existing Those ideas and the energy created has Group’s exposure to the Principal Risk on
silver score been shared with the wider organisation ESG. For example, disclosures made as part
• The Sustainability Committee invited two by establishing a Sustainability Working of CDP reporting have identified further
guest speakers – a major bank and Helsinki Group comprising representatives from improvements that can be made across
Nasdaq listed manufacturing company the divisions, Group HSE, Legal function, the Group, that when implemented will both
– to share their journeys to support the Group Communications and Group Investor decrease the risk exposure and increase the
Sustainability Committee as it develops Relations. The Sustainability Working Group CDP rating.
its understanding of best practices and has also been able to monitor and respond
learnings from other companies and on ESG and sustainability related topics on Task Force on Climate Disclosure (TFCD)
various stakeholders a day-to day-basis. The Sustainability Committee will spend time
• Received updates on key sustainability during 2021 considering the impact of TCFD
initiatives including the reduction of single Building on the response from employees, disclosures in order to meet TFCD reporting
use plastics across the Group. the Sustainability Committee agreed four requirements. The Sustainability Committee
sustainability targets. These continue to will focus on the four TFCD disclosure areas
be embedded within the organisation and of governance, strategy, risk management
monitoring the progress against the agreed and metrics and targets and review existing
KPIs will be the focus for the Sustainability activity and reporting metrics as well as
Committee during 2021. identify where there may be gaps in order
to reach an agreed approach.
102 NOMINATION COMMITTEE REPORT ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
NOMINATION
COMMITTEE REPORT
COMPOSITION,
SUCCESSION AND Roles and responsibilities
EVALUATION • Reviewing the size, structure and
composition of the Board to ensure they
• Undertaking succession planning for the
Board and senior executive positions and
remain appropriate to the Company’s keeping under review the leadership needs
strategic objectives of the business
• Support the development and keep under • Determining the independence of Directors
review diversity and inclusion • Assessing whether Directors commit enough
• Recommending membership of the Board time to discharge their responsibilities
and its Committees and leading the process • Reviewing the induction and training needs
“The Nomination for new Board appointments of Directors
Committee actively
considers whether
succession plans
build diversity and Membership and attendance
3 (3)
Other attendees
During 2020, the Group HR Director and the Chairman of the Diversity and Inclusion Steering Group attended by invitation as
appropriate.
Figures in brackets denote the maximum number of meetings that could have been attended. The Company Secretary and General
Counsel acts as Secretary to the Nomination Committee, with the support of the Head of Governance who also attends all meetings.
Paul Lester, CBE Lorraine Trainer retired from the Board on 20 May 2020 and therefore was only scheduled to attend 1 of the meetings.
Non-Executive Chairman
103 NOMINATION COMMITTEE REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
The Nomination Committee
Key activities 2020 • Encouraging further action to embed The Chief Executive presented his annual agreed to trial a Board
• Reviewed the composition, structure, and develop diversity and inclusion management succession plan to the Apprentice scheme with
size and skill set of the Company’s Board across the organisation Nomination Committee which was a view to increasing the
and the Committees and recommended • Assess whether directors are able to considered in detail with ongoing updates pool of talent available
the appointment of Lily Liu to the commit enough time to discharge provided at following meetings. This process to all plc boards.
Sustainability Committee their responsibilities helps to ensure that the development
of senior management and other high
• Reviewed the Company’s approach to
a diversity and inclusion Board apprentice performing individuals is actively managed
During the year, the Nomination Committee so that the business has the leadership it
• Reviewed succession planning for the requires. The Nomination Committee also
Board, key roles on the GMC and senior agreed to pilot the introduction of a Board
Apprentice in 2021. Both the Board and the considers whether the succession plan builds
management roles and the plans to diversity in senior roles and where necessary a regular invitee, and her enthusiasm and
address any development needs for Nomination Committee recognise there
is a general lack of available talent from this allows the Nomination Committee, the interest in sustainability was evident in her
senior management Chief Executive and the Group HR Director contribution as was her commitment to
within ethnic minority communities with the
• Reviewed the leadership needs of the to agree actions to better ensure the talent integrate sustainability within the strategy
attributes required for UK plc board positions.
business as it developed its strategy pipeline is more diverse. The development planning cycle for 2021. The Nomination
The Nomination Committee therefore agreed
including the impact of COVID-19 on of a diverse range of talent will continue Committee are very pleased to approve
to trial a Board Apprentice scheme with a
the nature of leadership required by to be a focus in 2021. The Nomination Lily’s appointment.
view to increasing the pool of talent available
the organisation Committee noted the importance of the
to all plc boards. The individual selected will
• Reviewed the results of the Board Future Leaders Programme, which successfully Diversity and inclusion
have the appropriate attributes to go on
Evaluation and implemented an action to become a future Non-Executive Director recruited a diverse and broad selection of The Nomination Committee and the Board
plan accordingly but be in need of an opportunity to gain plc graduates. Continued engagement with the continue to review diversity and inclusion
board experience which this role will provide. Future Leaders was critical to not just the and noted that whilst some initiatives had
• Reviewed and approved the Nomination
This will run as a 12-month programme and programme’s success and to maintaining out of necessity received a lower profile whilst
Committee Report for inclusion within
will provide both the individual and the Board momentum by those selected throughout the organisation managed its way through
the 2019 Annual Report
with benefits. We look forward to reporting on their careers. the global pandemic, the importance of
• Reviewed and agreed revised Terms of
this initiative in our next annual report. diversity and inclusion remained. The launch
Reference for the Nomination Committee Sustainability of Essentra Thrives, which supports health and
Key Activities for 2021 Talent management and succession During the year, as the Sustainability wellbeing across the organisation, emphasised
planning Committee continued to embed itself the importance of including all of Essentra’s
• Ongoing review of succession planning for into the governance framework and people and providing them with the same
the Board, its Committees, the GMC and The Nomination Committee continues to
take an active interest in the quality and in the organisation, the Nomination level of support regardless of role or location.
senior management roles Committee agreed to appoint Lily Liu to the The Committee agreed that as the
development of talent and capabilities below
• Monitoring the introduction and Sustainability Committee. Lily had initially organisation emerged from the pandemic,
Board level, particularly at GMC level and
effectiveness of a Board Apprentice attended the Sustainability Committee as a relaunch of diversity and inclusion would
senior management.
104 NOMINATION COMMITTEE REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
benefit everyone by continuing to build Terms of Reference. The process takes into • a review of the strategy for each one • there is a good process for stakeholder
awareness and understanding amongst staff. account the independence of the candidate, of the divisions management with regular meetings with
This would also reflect agreed activity that an assessment of the candidate’s skills • development of ESG throughout the shareholders along with virtual employee
formed the wider organisational strategy. against the required skills and experience for organisation engagement sessions.
the role and how the appointment supports • Board support had improved considerably
• initiating a processes for stronger talent
During 2020, Diversity and Inclusion Steering the Board’s commitment to diversity. over the year
management and succession planning
Group that had been established in 2019,
• recruitment of a Head of Governance to • the Audit and Risk and Remuneration
met early in the year and considered plans The Nomination Committee agreed that the
enhance board support and strengthen Committees were very well run and
for diversity initiatives during 2020. The Group fundamental objective for all appointments
governance throughout the organisation highly effective
considered the challenges it faced across remained the that the best person needed to
the globe with differing attitudes towards be appointed to do the best job for Essentra,
A second board evaluation Priorities for change
diversity and inclusion. Whilst the Diversity taking into consideration other factors, such
and Inclusion Steering Group agreed it was as market and international experience, and The Board agreed in October 2020 to carry out The Board agreed that following the second
appropriate to focus on people’s safety as diversity of thought and background. a further review, as the Board was conscious review, the following priorities would be
a priority during the global pandemic, there that not having been able to meet in person addressed during 2021:
was agreement that this did not decrease the Appointing people on merit, without any form had made the dynamics of the Board more
of discrimination, remains the key component • a refreshed focus on Board dynamics
importance or need of diversity. The Diversity challenging. The informal time that the Board
of Essentra policies across its international to ensure that the Board operated as
and Inclusion Steering Group look forward would usually spend together had been lost,
operations at all levels. Further details on efficiently as possible with creative
to renewing their focus and continuing their and the Board believed that it needed to
the Company’s approach to diversity and approaches to be adopted to ensure the
work in 2021. consider its performance again through a
inclusion can be found on page 34. Board worked well together
fresh pair of eyes. Sam Allen Associates (SAA)
The Nomination Committee also considered was appointed to externally facilitate an • more time would be spent on divisional
the Board’s diversity and looked at its Board evaluation interview-driven review of the effectiveness strategies supported by regular reporting
composition. The Board agreed that its and performance of the Board, its committees on the agreed performance metrics for
As required the 2018 Corporate Governance
composition was reasonably diverse both and directors. SAA engaged with the Chairman each of the divisional strategies
Code, the Board undertakes an annual review
from gender and ethnicity but that a Board of its effectiveness. The Board engaged of the Nomination Committee to set the • increased focus on succession planning
Apprentice could further encourage greater Lintstock to carry out this review and with the scope and areas of focus. The conclusions were from senior management upwards to
ethnic diversity and provide views and insights Chairman of the Nomination Committee, the presented to the Board in early 2021: further develop a diverse talent pipeline
that could benefit the performance of both scope of evaluation and areas for focus were in line with strategic expectations.
the Board and the organisation as a whole. agreed. The conclusions were provided to the • the Board is very experienced and fully
involved in decision making and competent Key objectives and selecting a service
Board in February 2020 with an action plan
Board nomination process on all regulatory matters provider for 2020 evaluation
developed and further discussions held by the
Whilst there were no appointments made Board in May 2020 following a re-scheduling • the Board has adapted well to a rapidly Neither Lintstock nor SAA have any
during the year, the Nomination Committee of the presentation due to COVID-19. These changing situation with robust debate other connection with the Company
follows a process to ensure that an open and actions were implemented in early 2020 and throughout 2020 or individual Directors.
transparent process is used in line with its included:
105 CHAIRMAN OF THE AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE’S LETTER ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
As Chairman of the Essentra plc Audit and balance sheet reviews, financial controls, Mary Reilly, Chairman 4 (4)
Risk Committee (the “ARC”), I am pleased supply chain integrity, safeguarding people, Tommy Breen, Non-Executive Director 4 (4)
to present my Report for the year ended business resilience and security. Our Group Lorraine Trainer, Non-Executive Director 2 (2)
31 December 2020 to shareholders. Assurance team were able to both support Nicki Demby, Non-Executive Director 4 (4)
the businesses whilst providing an additional
Other attendees
The Report provides an insight into the ARC’s level of assurance that the ARC needed. Lorraine Trainer resigned as a Non-Executive Director on 20 May 2020 and therefore only attended 2 meetings.
deliberations and activities throughout Audits were undertaken remotely using
The External Auditor, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive, Chief Financial Officer, Head of Group Assurance, Group Financial
the year and explains how it has fulfilled a combination of in-depth reviews and Controller, Ralf Wunderlich and members of the Group Management Committee (GMC) attended meetings by invitation, as
its oversight role on behalf of the Essentra self-assessment checklists with follow up appropriate. During the year, the ARC met the External Auditor, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC), and the Group Head of Assurance
without the Executive Directors being present.
Board, by monitoring and robustly challenging discussions held with relevant colleagues.
the integrity of the Group’s financial We continue to develop our internal audit The ARC received presentations from the Chief Executive, the Chief Financial Officer, Group Financial Controller, Divisional
Managing Directors, Group Head of Tax, Group Head of Treasury, UK Shared Services Finance Director, the Chief Information
reporting the systems of internal control practices to take account of the challenges Officer and the Chief Information Security Officer.
and its risk management framework. The presented by the pandemic.
Figures in brackets denote the maximum number of meetings that could have been attended.
Report explains how the ARC has met the
requirements placed on audit committees The ARC also spent time reviewing the The Company Secretary and General Counsel acts as Secretary to the ARC with the support of the Head of Governance
who attends all meetings.
by the 2018 Code and applicable guidance, processes associated with the Company’s risk
laws and regulations. In carrying out its management and supported the Board in
duties the ARC also operated in accordance its assessment of the Principal and Emerging business. Despite the challenges presented As we emerge from the disruption caused
with recommendations set out in the FRC Risks and the effectiveness of the mitigation by COVID-19 and the focus on safety, the by the pandemic, the ARC will be focused
Guidance on Audit Committees which was plans. Following an extensive review of Company continued with training and other on overseeing the extended Group
published in April 2016 and remain cognisant how COVID-19 may have changed the risk compliance activities. The plan agreed for Assurance programme and ensuring that
of updated FRC guidance, letters and reports profile and appetite, the ARC recommended 2021 continues to drive improvements and the risk management, internal control and
that are relevant to the work of the ARC. redefining some of our Principal Risks and the takes account of changes in risk profile and compliance activities remain robust and
introduction of a new Principal Risk: Exposure lessons learnt, and has provided assurance effective. The ARC will also be working with
The Committee has continued to play a to the Cyclical Industrial Market – Components to the ARC that the terms of the DPA agreed the External Auditor on the transition of the
key role within the Company’s governance division. Emerging Risks were also refined and with the DoJ can be met on an ongoing basis. partner. Finally, as Chairman of the ARC, I
framework to support the Board in matters a new risk identified: Evolving Conditions of am pleased to engage with shareholders and
relating to financial reporting, internal control the Debt Market. The detailed report which follows, aims continue to be available to meet if asked.
and risk management. COVID-19 brought a to provide insight into the workings and
focus to the system of internal controls and In light of the matters highlighted in activity of the ARC throughout the year as Mary Reilly
financial reporting and we sought assurance last year’s Annual Report regarding the it seeks to assist the Board in discharging Non-Executive Director
investigations into historical non-compliance its responsibilities. The Report covers, inter Audit and Risk Committee Chairman
over these with the support of our Group
with US trade sanction laws in the Filters alia, the integrity of Financial Reporting; 5 March 2021
Assurance team.
division and the settlements reached with the relationship with the External Auditor;
As the pandemic impacted the original 2020 the DoJ and OFAC in 2020, the ARC have the progress made with the compliance
internal audit plan, a revised plan of internal paid particular attention to the accounting transformation programme and the
audits was put in place for H2 that focussed and reporting implications of the agreed effectiveness of the risk management process
on key areas of risk to the business at that settlements and the ongoing programmes and internal control processes. I believe
time so that the audit would also support the to enhance compliance procedures across that the ARC has the necessary experience,
business’ approach to those areas. The ARC the Group. During the year, the ARC expertise and financial understanding to fulfil
has since agreed an extended internal audit received regular reports on the compliance its responsibilities and meet the increasing
plan for 2021. transformation programme to ensure that governance demands.
it was being implemented across all of the
107 REPORT OF THE AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
REPORT OF THE
AUDIT AND RISK
COMMITTEE
Governance In the performance of its duties the ARC evaluation reconfirmed that the ARC worked
All the ARC members are independent has independent access to Group Assurance well and to be “a very diligent and effective
Non-Executive Directors, and have financial and the External Auditors and may obtain Committee” that made time for “good
and/or related business experience gained outside professional advice if required. Group debate on important matters”.
in senior positions at other large diverse Assurance and the External Auditor has direct
access to the Chairman of the ARC who There is an annual cycle of items considered
organisations. Mary Reilly has been the
held a number of meetings with the Group by the ARC covering the requirement of the
Chairman of the ARC since April 2018, and
Assurance team and the External Auditor external audit cycle and any other relevant
the Board is satisfied that Mary has recent
during the year outside formal Committee matter, as detailed in the Terms of Reference “The ARC operates very well and
and relevant financial experience. Mary spent
the majority of her career at Deloitte and is meetings. The Chairman of the ARC also of the ARC. The agenda cycle is reviewed was said to be a very diligent and
an experienced audit chair. Each of the other liaises with the Chief Financial Officer as annually to ensure that the ARC remains effective Committee.”
well as the Company Secretary and General proactive and relevant. The current Terms
ARC members also has relevant experience:
Counsel as necessary to ensure there is robust of Reference for the ARC are available at
Nicki Demby is a fellow of the Institute of
oversight and challenge in relation to financial essentraplc.com and are also reviewed
Chartered Accountants and formerly a
control, risk management and compliance. annually. The Terms of Reference provide a
partner of Deloitte LLP and Tommy Breen
framework for the ARC’s work to review and
is a former CEO of an international sales,
Two evaluations were carried out of the oversee the quality, integrity, appropriateness
marketing and services group. Biographies for
Committee during the year. and effectiveness including the following:
the ARC members can be found on page 83
and 84. As a whole the Board believes that
The first review was carried out by Lintstock • Financial Statements and external
the members of the ARC are competent in
who made recommendations relating to the financial reporting
the business sectors within which the Essentra
performance of the meetings. An action plan • significant financial judgements
Group operates. The ARC supports the Board
was agreed and implemented early in 2020.
and reports to it following each Committee • Tax and Treasury function review
The overall performance of the ARC was very
meeting. No member of the ARC has a • cyber security response
highly rated.
connection with the current External Auditor. • the compliance programme
A second evaluation was undertaken by • the efficacy of the Internal Audit function
Sam Allen Associates at the end of 2020 to
• the risk management processes and
consider whether the dynamics of the ARC
practice
had been impacted through a prolonged
period of virtual meetings. The second • the relationship with, and performance of
the External Auditor.
108 REPORT OF THE AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Financial Statements and external Tax and treasury review Additional details on the Group Tax
financial reporting During the year joint presentations were made Strategy can be found on essentraplc.com/
Ensuring the integrity of the Financial to the ARC by the Group Head of Tax and the responsibility.
Statements and associated announcements Group Head of Treasury due to the recognition
is a fundamental responsibility of the ARC. of the close working relationship of these two
Cyber security response
In recommending to the Board, with regard functions, particularly in relation to: The Chief Information Officer attended ARC
to the approval of the 31 December 2019 meetings on a regular basis and provided ARC
Annual Report and the 30 June 2020 Half The tax strategy, attitude to tax risk and with regular reports on the improvements
During the year, the pandemic governance and monitoring: and controls being implemented within the
Year Report, the ARC reviewed, examined
resulted in an increased focus and challenged the Chief Financial Officer Group to help mitigate against the increasing
on viability. and External Auditor on their respective • tax actions taken during the year and the risk posed to businesses by cyber attack.
assessments on such items as going concern impact of COVID-19 on cash management Cyber security had been greatly increased
basis of preparation, accounting policies and • short and long-term liquidity across the Group in response to the increasing
disclosures, any financial reporting issues, risk profile, particularly given the impact of
• a review of transfer pricing global
significant financial judgements made and COVID-19 and changes in working practices,
documentation processes
appropriate levels of disclosures to ensure and with the move to our people working at
• a review of the Senior Accounting home, there were further enhancements put
that the reports are fair, balanced and
Officer process. in place to ensure the security of our systems
understandable. The ARC also challenged
the External Auditor on the appropriateness which was supported additionally by cyber
Updates were also provided on global
of their audit coverage and their measure security awareness training.
regulatory changes, including the EU
of materiality. mandatory disclosures rules and Corporate The Chairman of the ARC also held additional
Criminal Offence Act 2020, and compliance sessions with the Chief Information Officer
During the year, the pandemic resulted in
matters including activity to be undertaken and the Chief Information Security Officer
an increased focus on viability and the ARC
during the year. The ARC considered the and reported back to the Committee on the
reviewed the contents and suitability of the
matters presented and were satisfied with work undertaken by the relevant teams to
Long-Term Viability Statement and going
the approach being taken. ensure appropriate cyber resilience activities
concern, and challenged the risk scenarios,
the range of sensitivities applied and the were in place.
Following the resignation of the Group Head
potential impacts considered in line with of Treasury, the Tax and Treasury functions
FRC guidance. have been combined and is led by the Group
Head of Tax who has taken on the role of joint
role of Group Head of Treasury and Tax.
109 REPORT OF THE AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Compliance Right to speak and whistleblowing Assurance function and the adequacy of
The Company’s commitment to conducting The ARC received updates at each of its its resourcing and plans. The ARC, and the
its business activities in accordance with all meetings on any right to speak issues raised Board, are committed to a prioritised and
applicable laws and regulations was further and sought assurance from management structured internal audit programme to drive
enhanced in 2020 through the introduction on the issues raised and the Company’s improvements in the Company’s internal
of an executive Group Compliance response. At the outbreak of COVID-19, our control systems.
Committee (GCC). people were understandably concerned
about safety measures being taken and we Group Assurance assists the Company in
The GCC is chaired by the Company Secretary encouraged our people to use the right to accomplishing its objectives by bringing a
and General Counsel and has met monthly Key activities 2020 speak process to ensure any inconsistencies in systematic and disciplined approach to the
throughout 2020 with representation from • Compliance training, both online, approach and safety measures were reported evaluation, assurance and improvement
across the divisions and Group. The GCC and remote sessions in place of in to senior management directly. This approach in the effectiveness of the organisation’s
reports to each ARC on the response to key person sessions allowed remedial action to be taken quickly risk management, internal control and
compliance risks and the programme of thereby ensuring the ongoing safety of our governance processes. In order to achieve this
• Regular review of training completion the ARC reviews:
activities designed to mitigate exposure. rates across the Group Essentra family.
Notwithstanding the impact of COVID-19, • Risk assessments • the internal audit plan and its achievement
During the year, particular concerns were
which meant the GCC had to re-prioritise its • Policy reviews, development of short expressed regarding potential conflicts of of the approved internal audit plan’s
plans, good progress was still made. The GCC form summaries and a tool box interest impacting one site and the ARC activities
has remained focused on driving effectiveness approach to training materials oversaw a thorough investigation of the • the adequacy of the budget and resources
and continuous improvements in compliance. • Re-brand of compliance materials allegations, including the use of external of the Group Assurance function
The Compliance Plan has seen significant • Development of a Compliance Charter resource, and continues to monitor the • the operational initiatives for the
cultural change and the sharing of information and Framework impact of the Company’s response including continuous improvement of the function’s
across divisions has allowed synergies to local management transition to mitigate effectiveness
• Development of a refreshed Ethics Code
be harnessed to best use, for instance in future risk. • follow-up of internal audit activities which
monitoring the effectiveness of training. • Development of a Compliance Plan
for 2021 focus on unsatisfactory audit results
Internal control and internal audit
The compliance transformation programme • Testing of the effectiveness of the • the adequacy of management’s response
Essentra has a well-established Internal and the necessary actions taken to address
has had particular regard to the impact training programme within one Audit function, which sits within Group
of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement division and to be replicated across and rectify any weaknesses identified in a
Assurance to monitor and review material timely manner.
requirements around regulatory and sanctions all divisions during 2021 controls such as financial, operational and
compliance, third-party due diligence and compliance controls. The ARC is required to
anti-money laundering and undertook activity assist the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities
that supported these key areas. for ensuring the capability of the Group
110 REPORT OF THE AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
As the year unfolded it became evident the response, its actions and the process used to • reviewed the level of non-audit work being
original internal audit plan would not be consider the effectiveness of the mitigations. carried out by the External Auditor and “The Group Assurance team
able to be carried out due to the impact confirmed the level of services ensured their continues to adapt its approach
of COVID-19. A revised schedule was put in The ARC concluded that the process had continued independence to take account of new best
place for H2 that focused on key risk areas to been very thorough and was assured further • the Chairman of the ARC met with the practices and the key challenges
the business and the ARC ensured the plan that the Chairman of the ARC had also External Audit partner frequently outside impacting the business.”
remained robust and relevant as well as being been present at the Group Risk Committee of the meeting schedule.
achievable despite the necessary change meetings in which the risks had been
to remote audit practices and different reviewed. The ARC’s work in turn supported Assessment of the External Auditor
ways of working. The ARC has approved an the Board by providing it with assurance it
The ARC is provided with reports, reviews,
internal audit plan for 2021 which provides a needed as to the robust nature of the process
information and advice throughout the
significant increase in activity, with additional used by the Company to identify risk.
year, as set out in the terms of the External
investment in internal resource and co-source Auditor’s engagement and performance is
arrangements to ensure the delivery of an More information on Principal and Emerging
Risks can be found on pages 50 to 66, the formally assessed by the ARC in conjunction
extensive programme of assurance despite with the GMC. The ARC assesses the External
the potential ongoing impacts of COVID-19. Long Term Viability Statement on page 147
and 148 and the Risk Management Process Auditor’s independence annually and remains
The Group Assurance team continues to satisfied that the External Auditor is effective
adapt its audit approach and methodologies on 110.
and provided appropriate independent
to take account of the new best practice challenge to the Company’s management.
which are emerging. External Auditor
During the year the ARC: Independence of the External Auditor
Risks Management Process
• reviewed and agreed the scope and The ARC believes that it is important to The ARC Chairman, without the approval
The ARC’s discussions and considerations and maintain the objectivity and independence of the Committee, is authorised by the
oversight of the risk management process strategic nature of the audit work to be
undertaken of the External Auditor by minimising their Company to engage the External Auditor on
continued throughout the year working closely involvement in projects of a non-audit nature. non-audit related work where the service is
with the Group Risk Committee and the • agreed the terms of engagement and fees in compliance with the whitelist of services
The Revised Ethical Standard 2019 provides a
Group Assurance function. This enabled the to be paid to the External Auditor under the Revised Ethical Standard 2019,
whitelist of services which may be provided to
ARC to assess the quality of existing practices • reviewed the qualifications, resources and public interest entities – if the service is not on and the fees per project are not considered
and processes used to identify, assess and independence of the External Auditor and the list, it must not be provided to the Group. to be significant, provided that the annual
mitigate responses to risks to the Company assessed its performance with particular There is a policy in place which reflects best aggregate of non-audit related fees shall
achieving its long term strategic objectives. regard to the overall quality of the external practice in relation to the engagement of the not exceed 70% of the average of the audit
The ARC undertook deep dives into risk areas audit and especially challenged the External Auditor to supply non-audit services fees paid in the last three consecutive
which provided the opportunity for the ARC to External Auditor’s ability to carry out a in compliance with the whitelist, with defined financial years.
challenge the effectiveness of the Company’s robust audit remotely parameters and approval requirements.
111 REPORT OF THE AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Details of the fees paid to PwC up until Engagement of the External Auditor The ARC has been kept up to date with the
31 December 2020 can be found in note 2 The External Auditor was originally engaged development of regulations concerning
of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial by the Company in 2017 following a audit tenure and the longevity of audit firm
Statements, which includes fees paid to the competitive tendering process. The External relationships with companies they audit. In
External Auditor and its network firms for Auditor is engaged to express an audit opinion 2016 a comprehensive competitive tender
audit services, audit-related services and on the truth and fairness of the Financial was undertaken for the external audit and
non-audit services. Statements. The external audit includes the subsequently the appointment of PwC to
review and testing of the system of internal replace the Company’s previous auditors was
PwC provided a letter confirming that it approved by the shareholders at the 2017
financial controls and the data contained
believes it remains independent within the AGM. As detailed above the ARC is satisfied
in the Financial Statements to the extent
meaning of the regulations on this matter with the External Auditor’s effectiveness
necessary. In order to protect independence
and in accordance with their professional and independence and accordingly has
and objectivity and provide fresh challenge to
standards. The ARC formally reviewed the recommended to the Board that PwC be
the business, the External Auditor periodically
letter which describes arrangements in place reappointed as the Company’s External
changes the audit partners at a Group,
to identify, report, and manage any conflicts of Auditor at the 2021 AGM. The Company will
divisional and country level, in accordance
interests and policies and procedures including continue to consider on a regular basis any
with professional and regulatory standards.
the extent of non-audit services, to maintain potential benefits from tendering the audit
Such changes are carefully planned to ensure
independence and the subsequent monitoring. process having regard, in particular, to the
that the Group benefits from staff continuity
without incurring undue risk of inefficiency. importance of audit quality or the continued
Effectiveness of the External Auditor independence of the External Auditor. There are
The External Auditor is required to rotate
The ARC assessed the effectiveness of the the lead partner every five years, and such no contractual obligations in place that restrict
External Auditor by reviewing: changes will be carefully planned to ensure the Company’s choice of statutory auditor.
business continuity without undue risk or
• the External Auditor’s fulfilment of the The Company has complied throughout the
inefficiency. The current audit partner is
agreed audit plan and the quality of their year with the Statutory Order 2014 issued by
Nicholas Stevenson who has been in this role
work including the depth and appropriate the Competition and Markets Authority.
since PwC was appointed in April 2017. The
challenges year end 2021 will be Nicholas’s last year and
• feedback highlighting the major issues that the External Audit partner and the ARC has
arose during the course of the audit already started working with PwC to ensure a
• feedback from the businesses and smooth and effective transition.
management evaluating the performance
of each assigned audit team.
112 REPORT OF THE AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Goodwill and intangible assets of businesses, acquisition related integration and sought assurance that the Company As appropriate during a period of uncertainty,
As required by IAS 36, the Company and restructuring costs, and other items such was working diligently to resolve outstanding the External Auditor provided significant
undertakes an assessment of the carrying as impairment losses. Following an extensive liabilities in an appropriate fashion. The potential challenge to the ARC on the process used to
value of intangible assets on an annual basis, review, the ARC is satisfied that the Company’s tax exposures over the Company’s transfer undertake the assessment and the outcome
or more frequently if there is an indication of definition of adjusting items remains clear and pricing position and the deductibility of interest of the scenarios. The ARC, on behalf of the
impairment. The details of the work carried out that appropriate level of disclosure is included. on internal financing are also considered. Board, challenged the assumptions and
and the results are in note 8 of the Notes to The definition remains consistent with the sensitivities around the scenarios presented by
prior year, and in the current year the ARC has The ARC reviewed the assumptions of the management and where judgement had been
the Financial Statements. The assumptions for
been involved in a rigorous review of the items tax liabilities at the start of the year, those applied, the ARC sought and was provided with
2021 and beyond (such as the annual growth
presented and following a robust discussion created during the year and the effective tax explanation that the ARC were satisfied with.
rate and the terminal growth rate) are based
the ARC agreed to adopt a de minimus rate as indicated in the Financial Statements In turn, management dedicated an extensive
on the 2021 annual plan and management’s
approach. The ARC challenged the Chief from page 151 and note 4 of the Notes to period of time and resource to stress testing
financial projections in subsequent years.
Financial Officer about the appropriateness the Consolidated Financial Statements. The a range of scenarios that provided a range
The impairment reviews performed by
of items presented including impairment and ARC questioned and challenged the Chief of outcomes.
management contain a number of significant
restructuring activities to ensure they are one- Financial Officer and Head of Group Tax as
judgements and estimates including revenue
off material items rather than incurred in the to the appropriateness of the Company’s More information on the Group’s going
growth, profit margins and discount rates.
ordinary course of business and are presented risk attitude and appetite in this area. The concern can be found on pages 146 and 147.
A change in these assumptions can result
separately to allow a better understanding of ARC was satisfied that the tax liabilities
in a material change in the valuation of the The ARC also reviewed the Group’s long-
the Group’s ongoing activities. Further details are appropriate, and that the Group’s tax
assets and the eventual outcome of the term viability assessment for the period
can be found in note 2 of the Notes to the disclosures are adequate given the nature of
impairment assessment. The ARC evaluated to 31 December 2023 which considered a
Financial Statements. the Company’s activities.
and challenged the methodology of the range of scenarios based on the potential
impairment review and the assumptions on Going concern and long-term financial impact of the Group’s Principal Risks
Tax liabilities
which it was based, including the financial viability assessment crystallising as well as the risks associated
plans approved by the Board. The Company is, on occasion, subject to tax
The ARC reviewed the assumptions applied with COVID-19 also impacting the risks.
assessments that may represent potential
for going concern and long-term viability Similar to the challenges the ARC presented
The ARC discussed the current year assessment future tax exposures, which arise from tax
assessment. At half-year 2020 and at year-end management in assessing the going concern
at length with the Chief Financial Officer, the authorities in a number of the jurisdictions
2020, an extensive process was applied to the position, the ARC challenged the relevance
Chief Executive and the External Auditor the in which the Group operates. The Group
going concern that assessed the outcome of and assumptions of the Principal Risks to
review and assumptions presented, including assesses all such exposures in the context of
a range of scenarios. This included a downside the Company’s long term viability. The
consideration of the impact of COVID-19 on specific country tax laws, where applicable,
scenario that reflects the current uncertainty External Auditor again challenged the ARC
such assessments. After due consideration makes provisions for any settlements which
in the global economy but which was thought on the process adopted and was satisfied
the ARC was satisfied that the impairment it considers appropriate.
to be severe but plausible. The results of this that a robust and through process was in
assessment is appropriately carried out. The
The Company operates in a number of tax scenario show that there is sufficient liquidity place so that the ARC was able to make a
relevant disclosure is set out in note 8 of the
jurisdictions, and recognises tax based on in the business for a period of at least 12 recommendation to the Board on the Group’s
Notes to the Financial Statements.
interpretation of local laws and regulations months from the date of approval of these long-term viability.
Adjusting items which are sometimes opaque. Where the financial statements, and do not indicate any
The more detailed assessment of the Group’s
The Financial Statements include certain amount of tax payable is uncertain, the covenant breach during the test period. The
long-term viability is set out in the Long-Term
items which are disclosed as adjusting Directors are required to exercise significant scenario includes assumption for similar extent
Viability Statement on pages 148.
items. The nature of these items is explained judgement in determining the appropriate of disruptions as seen in 2020. Set against
within the Group Accounting Policy, and amount to provide in respect of potential tax this were mitigating actions including tight
includes transaction costs and gains or exposures. The ARC challenged the nature and management of capital expenditure, sales and
losses relating to acquisitions and disposals extent of the tax provisioning of the Company general overhead, and working capital.
113 CHAIRMAN OF THE REMUNERATION COMMITTEE’S LETTER ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
2020 was a year of Dear Shareholder to the future of the environment in which we
do business. The products we manufacture
This report includes:
responsible remuneration. As Chair of the Remuneration Committee and distribute are integral to the supply chain • The proposed Directors’ Remuneration
The Executive Directors I am pleased to present to you the Directors’
Remuneration Report for the year ended
of many of our customers. Our customers
want to work with a manufacturer who takes
Policy to be approved at the 2021 AGM;
and
received reduced 31 December 2020. a responsible approach to environmental
issues. It is important to our current and • The Annual Directors’ Remuneration
salaries, reduced pension Consultation with our shareholders future employees they work for a business Report, describing how the current Policy
allowances, no annual I had the opportunity to consult with some
that is reducing its environmental impact.
Increasingly, our shareholders want to invest
has been put into practice during 2020,
and how we plan to implement the new
of our shareholders during the year as
bonuses and no LTIP we considered our proposals for the new
in a company that is making progress on the Policy in 2021.
environmental sustainability issues that are
awards were made Directors’ Remuneration Policy. We heard a
range of views and these perspectives were
relevant to our business. This is my first Directors’ Remuneration
in 2020 invaluable in shaping our final proposals.
Our proposal is to take a balanced approach
Report since my appointment as Chair
of the Remuneration Committee at the
given the feedback we received. I want to AGM in May 2020. I would like to thank
The discussions were particularly helpful
thank our shareholders for their time and my predecessor, Lorraine Trainer, for her
in terms of the way we intend to link part
input, which was helpful and constructive. contribution as Chair of the Remuneration
of incentive outcomes in the future to the
progress of the business on environmental Committee prior to the AGM in 2020.
Responding to the pandemic in 2020 –
sustainability. Our shareholders emphasised
a year of responsible remuneration
that the performance measures we use
should be relevant to the business and to At the beginning of 2020, the COVID-19
value creation. In future we have decided to outbreak was in its very early stages and
link part of the outcomes of our variable pay the severity and scale of its impact was not
plans to progress against our longer-term yet apparent. The first of our businesses
environmental sustainability targets. We to be impacted was in mainland China in
believe these are important to some of our key January 2020. As with many international
stakeholders; our customers, our employees, groups, Essentra’s ability to do business
our suppliers and our shareholders, as well as was immediately and significantly affected.
Nicki Demby
Non-Executive Director
114 CHAIRMAN OF THE REMUNERATION COMMITTEE’S LETTER CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
We have provided All of the 34 countries in which we do business Through the year we have focused on Essentra has adapted to the new economic
financial support to all have been impacted by the pandemic and safeguarding our employees, supporting our environment. We suspended the payment
our global employees when we have responded to successive Government customers, managing our cash flow and of our dividend in order to protect our
they were unable to work imposed restrictions in each of those building for the future. In a year of responsible cash position. Towards the end of 2020 we
as a consequence of local countries. We recognise that it has caused remuneration, and as part of managing launched a detailed review of our global
or national Government considerable uncertainty and hardship for our our cash flow, the fixed pay of our Board footprint which resulted in the proposed
employees, customers and suppliers. and Senior Leaders across the business was closure of certain sites in 2021 across the
restrictions arising from
reduced by 20% for three months during the Components and Packaging divisions. While
the pandemic In line with our values, Essentra’s first response most uncertain period of the year, and any we deeply regret the impact these proposals
was focused on protecting the safety, health inflationary salary increase was removed. will have on some of our colleagues, these
and wellbeing of our employees. Our 2020 Other leaders in the business also reduced actions were both necessary and consistent
Employee Survey indicated that 85% of their fixed pay and any annual salary increase with our strategy to build for the future.
our employees felt that we had taken the was made on an exceptional basis only.
appropriate steps to ensure they remained safe Acquisition of 3C!
and healthy. We did not use UK Government Furthermore we made no LTIP awards in 2020. Looking ahead, Essentra is committed to
provided furlough support, nor did we borrow This was an unusual decision in the market emerging from the pandemic with a resilient
debt from the UK Government. We have place. It reflected that our Senior Leaders business. In September 2020, we raised equity
provided financial support to all our global were prepared to personally contribute to to buy 3C!, a packaging business in the US,
employees when they were unable to work as a making cost savings in the business. Stock and to strengthen our balance sheet. The
consequence of local or national Government market volatility in late March and April when acquisition adds manufacturing capacity and
restrictions arising from the pandemic and the LTIP grant is usually made was also a service capability to our existing Packaging
to the families of those employees who have concern. footprint in the Americas as well as access to
sadly lost their lives. There have been some proprietary serialisation technology.
notable and inspiring examples where Essentra All these measures funded company furlough
employees responded quickly to ensure that payments to employees unable to work in The need for a flexible approach to
our products reached local customers in the India, South Africa and Paraguay and also remuneration
health sector when they had an urgent need. contributed to payments for those needing to
Long term value creation for shareholders
Our Board Employee Champions, Mary Reilly isolate. This considered approach has meant
and pay for performance continue to be at
and Ralf Wunderlich, continued to engage with that we have maintained 80% of earnings
the heart of our remuneration policy and
groups of employees throughout 2020 using across the global workforce throughout the
practices. As we do business in 34 countries,
“virtual coffee mornings”, as we were no longer year, providing the financial support needed.
attracting and nurturing a mix of talent with
able to hold physical meetings.
a range of backgrounds, skills and capabilities
enables Essentra to thrive. This is the case
in good times, but has perhaps become
more important in more difficult times.
115 CHAIRMAN OF THE REMUNERATION COMMITTEE’S LETTER CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Remuneration remains a key part of attracting We intend to keep our approach to Directors’ We are widening the 2021 annual bonus
and retaining the people who we need to Remuneration under review and may seek performance target ranges and reducing
lead our business. We need to ensure that shareholder approval sooner than required by the proportion of bonus paid for achieving
our reward packages are appropriate and fair UK legislation if this becomes necessary. threshold performance (from 20% to 10%)
in the context of the business and the wider to reflect the difficulty of setting financial
BUILDING employee profile. We aim to deliver market Linking reward to performance targets in the current economic environment.
FOR THE FUTURE competitive pay in return for performance For 2020 no annual bonus is payable to
OUR VALUES OUR GOALS against the Company’s strategic objectives. the Executive Directors. The targets were The awards under the Long-Term Incentive
OUR set in February 2020 before the economic Plan will include a measure linked to our
PURPOSE
A winning,
Safety, respect
and diversity engaged and
empowered team
It is important that we maintain flexibility in impact of COVID-19 pandemic could be progress against our published target for
our approach to remuneration so that we can the reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG)
is to responsibly
Openness, honesty
provide the
products and Class-leading fully understood. Although the business
and integrity services our
customers
sustainability
remain adaptable in a rapidly changing world. performance remained resilient, the targets emissions. Reducing our carbon footprint
Energy
need to succeed
Growth through This has never been clearer than over the last proved unattainable in the economic is beneficial to the environment and
for change innovation
year. We have very carefully considered some environment that followed. drives reductions in the cost of energy to
alternative approaches. We have concluded the business. The emissions targets set
that a Directors’ Remuneration Policy which The performance targets set for the 2018- are consistent with the stated goal to
is fundamentally similar to our previous 20 LTIP were also not achieved. This was reduce GHG emissions by 25% from 2019
approach will provide the necessary flexibility partly attributable to the impact of the to 2025. Performance will be reviewed
for the future. Detailed aspects have been COVID-19 pandemic in the final year of by the Sustainability Committee and
updated to meet new external governance the performance period. externally audited.
requirements that have emerged since the
The awards under the last time we sought shareholder approval and Linking reward to strategy The table below summarises the KPIs that we
Long Term Incentive Plan to provide some limited areas of additional The table below summarises the KPIs that we
are planning to use in the LTIP compared to
will include a measure linked flexibility. The proposed changes are described are planning to use in the annual bonus in 2021.
our last grant in 2019. No LTIP awards were
to our progress against our in detail later in this Report. made in 2020.
published target for the KPI
reduction of greenhouse gas The approach to setting executive remuneration Adjusted Operating Profit 40%
LTIP
The Remuneration Committee carefully for Paul Forman (to 20% of salary) and 3% Conclusion
considered the appropriate size of the 2021 of salary for Lily Liu (to 15% of salary). This Essentra is committed to emerging stronger
LTIP awards, taking into account a range of follows reductions of £11,900 p.a. and £2,100 from the pandemic. It is important that
factors including share price performance, the p.a. respectively in 2020. Further reductions we maintain flexibility in our approach
decision not to make any LTIP awards in in pension provision to the level of the relevant to remuneration so that we can remain
2020 and the need to avoid windfall gains. workforce will be completed by the end of agile in a rapidly changing world. I hope
The Committee concluded that appropriate 2022. Our proposed new Policy indicates that you will find this report to be clear Essentra is committed to
award levels for 2021 will be unchanged that the pension provision for any future and helpful in understanding of our emerging stronger from the
from the award levels in 2019 at 200% Executive Director will be in line with the remuneration practices and that you will be pandemic. It is important that we
and 150% of salary for the CEO and CFO relevant workforce. in support of the resolution on the Directors’ maintain flexibility in our
respectively. We have carefully reviewed Remuneration Policy and the advisory approach to remuneration so that
the performance ranges to be used for The Remuneration Committee is satisfied
resolution on the Annual Remuneration we can remain agile in a rapidly
each element of the award. We have taken that the current Policy was operated as
Report at the 2021 AGM. As ever, the changing world.
a balanced approach to setting the LTIP intended since its introduction in 2018.
Remuneration Committee welcomes any
performance ranges given the uncertain questions or comments from shareholders.
economic environment in which the awards Remuneration for Executive Directors
are being made. The Committee retains the The Executive Director salaries were reviewed I am grateful to the Chairman and my
discretion to adjust the outcomes of the LTIP and will increase in April 2021 by 1.9%, in line colleagues for their professional guidance
awards to reflect the overall performance of with the wider UK workforce. and support in making responsible
the business over the performance period. decisions on remuneration.
Remuneration in our wider workforce
Considering the 2018 UK Corporate The Remuneration Committee continues to Nicki Demby
Governance Code (the ‘2018 code’) consider remuneration in our wider workforce Non-Executive Director
During the past year the Remuneration Remuneration Committee Chairman
when making decisions that affect our
5 March 2021
Committee has continued to discuss the senior executives. The Committee has also
2018 Code and its implications for Essentra. discussed a number of broader issues relating
As noted last year our remuneration to workforce and executive pay. These include
arrangements are already compliant with feedback received by our Board Employee
many of the 2018 Code provisions. The current Champions on employee share plans, merit
Executive Directors have agreed to further increases, and the ratio of Chief Executive pay
reduce their annual pension allowances with to that of our other employees. These topics
effect from 1 April 2021 by 3.1% of salary are reflected in the approach to reward across
the workforce.
117 REMUNERATION AT A GLANCE ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
AT A GLANCE
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Commentary Changes for 2021
PERFORMANCE PERIOD
– Adjusted Operating Profit: 40%
– Adjusted Operating Cash Flow: 30% is based on progress towards
50% shares – Strategic Objectives: 30% Zero Waste to Landfill
(deferred for
three years) (50% DEFERRED
FOR THREE YEARS)
Annual bonus 2020 Adjusted Operating Profit, Adjusted Operating Paul Forman 0% of maximum Details on page 135
Cash Flow, Personal and Strategic Objectives Lily Liu 0% of maximum
“ 2020 was a year of
LTIP 2018-20201 Adjusted EPS, Adjusted Cumulative Operating Paul Forman 0% of maximum Details on page 135
responsible remuneration. Cash Flow, Relative TSR
The Executive Directors 1 Lily Liu did not hold LTIP awards for this performance cycle as she joined the Board in November 2018.
received reduced salaries,
reduced pension allowances,
no annual bonuses and no LTIP
awards were made in 2020.” Paul Forman (£000)
Nicki Demby 611 37 152
Non-Executive Director 2020 actual 288 244
2020 maximum
611 37 152 917 1,222
Salary Bonus
Benefits LTIP
Pension
119 REMUNERATION AT A GLANCE CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
2020 Salary/Fee • In light of the continuing need to manage our • Our response to the COVID-19 situation has been to “Our peoples’ health
increases cash position and liquidity, the Committee safeguard our people, support our customers, and to and wellbeing has been our
approved the Executive Directors’ decision to manage our cash. Our people’s health and wellbeing top priority. By temporarily
voluntarily waive the 2.4% annual increase in has been our top priority. By temporarily reducing the
reducing the Executive and
their salaries that would have applied from 1 April Executive and Non-Executive Directors’ pay this has
2020, and the CFO’s salary increase was also helped fund furlough arrangements in countries that
Non-Executive Directors’ pay
reduced by 2.4%. have required us to temporarily close a factory or office. this has helped fund furlough
arrangements in countries that
• In addition, Executive Directors agreed to a 20% • The Company has not taken advantage of the Job
reduction in base salaries from 1 April to 30 June Retention Scheme or any other UK Government
have required us to temporarily
2020. The Chairman and Non-Executive Directors assistance resulting from COVID-19. close a factory or office.”
also agreed to a 20% reduction in their fees for Nicki Demby
this period. Non-Executive Director
2020 Bonus • The Executive Directors’ 2020 bonus was based • The Committee felt this was a responsible decision
on financial targets set before COVID-19 in light of the impact of the pandemic on wider
impacted our financial performance and no stakeholders in the business.
adjustments were made.
• No bonus was payable due to the impact of the
COVID-19 pandemic.
2020 LTIP Award • The Committee agreed to not make a 2020 • Not granting LTIP awards helped to support the
LTIP award. profitability of the Company in an exceptionally
difficult year.
120 THE DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION POLICY REPORT ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
THE DIRECTORS’
REMUNERATION
POLICY REPORT
The Directors’ Remuneration Policy The Remuneration Committee discussed Policy change Rationale for change and implementation in 2021
(“the Policy Report”) sets out the this Policy Report over a series of meetings
policies under which the Executive and which considered the strategic priorities of Introduction of post- In line with the UK Corporate Governance Code, the updated Policy
employment shareholding will incorporate a guideline for a Director to remain compliant with
Non-Executive Directors are remunerated. the business, governance requirements and guideline and change to their in-employment shareholding guideline for two years after leaving
The Policy Report is designed to be in evolving market practice. Input was sought design of in-employment employment.
full compliance with the requirements of from the CEO, CFO and members of the HR shareholding guideline The shareholding guideline that applies whilst a Director is in-employment
the Large and Medium-sized Companies team, while ensuring that conflicts of interests will remain at 300% of salary for the CEO and 200% of salary for other
Executive Directors. In order to better align the guideline with incentive
and Groups (Accounts and Reports) were suitably mitigated. Consideration was vesting outturns, the existing requirement to meet the guideline within six
(Amendment) Regulations 2013, the UK given to the wider workforce when evaluating years of appointment will be replaced by a requirement to retain at least
Corporate Governance Code as issued by 50% of post-tax vested shares until the guideline is satisfied.
the approach to Directors’ remuneration. We
the Financial Reporting Council and the have consulted with our major shareholders Extend malus and clawback In line with the FRC’s Guidance on Board Effectiveness, potential malus and
Listing Rules. and taken advice from our independent provisions in the bonus and clawback triggers will be widened to include business failure.
LTIP
advisers, Deloitte.
The current Directors’ Remuneration Policy Alignment of pension In line with the UK Corporate Governance Code, we will continue with our
was approved by our shareholders at the AGM Summary of key changes: The key provision phased approach to reducing the Executive Director pension allowances
in 2018. We are required by law to put a new to align with the relevant workforce by the end of 2022. Any new Executive
proposed changes in our updated Policy are Directors will have pension provision from appointment in line with the
Policy to our shareholders for approval three summarised below. These changes bring our relevant workforce.
years later. This will be presented at the 2021 Policy in line with current mainstream UK
Addition of Environmental, As a manufacturing company our environmental impact forms an
AGM. The current Policy Report can be found market practice and are consistent with the Social and Governance (ESG) important element of how we do business. Accordingly, scope to include
in full in the Essentra Annual Report 2017, a Essentra corporate strategy. measures as an alternative ESG measures in future bonus or LTIP awards forms part of the new Policy.
copy of which can be downloaded from type of measure in the bonus In 2021, we will introduce a greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions target into
or LTIP
www.essentraplc.com. our LTIP. The targets set will be consistent with the goal of reducing GHG
emissions by 25% by 2025 relative to a 2019 baseline.
The Remuneration Committee has reviewed Equalise the maximum In order to give the Remuneration Committee flexibility during the three-
the continued appropriateness of the current permitted bonus year Policy period, it is proposed to align the maximum bonus opportunity
opportunity for all Executive that can be offered under the Policy to all Executive Directors at 150%
Policy Report in the context of the Company’s Directors at 150% of salary of salary (currently the CFO has a lower maximum opportunity of 125%
corporate strategy. Shareholder approval of salary). As a Committee, we are mindful of the importance of using
will be sought at the AGM on 20 May 2021 this flexibility in a responsible manner and can confirm that the bonus
opportunity will be unchanged in 2021 (CEO: 150% of salary; CFO: 125% of
for the updated Policy Report set out below. salary).
Subject to shareholder approval, the updated
Policy Report will take effect immediately Change to Non-Executive In recognition of future increases in the level of time commitment
Directors’ (NEDs) fee required from a NED in our highly international business, the new Policy
after the AGM and will apply to the 2021 structure will provide flexibility to make additional payments to NEDs in the
financial year. event that an individual is required to make a significant additional
time commitment and/or to reflect travel time. The new Policy also
specifically makes reference to the additional fee payable to the Board
Employee Champion role, introduced in 2019 to ensure the Board
actively seek feedback direct from the global workforce.
121 THE DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION POLICY REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Remuneration Policy
1. Overview on an annual basis and has determined that • Select, appoint and determine the terms The Remuneration Committee considers all
The Remuneration Committee determines there are currently no significant concerns of reference for independent consultants elements of the remuneration package as a
and recommends to the Board the framework with the structure or operation of the to advise the Remuneration Committee on whole. It looks to ensure that an appropriate
for the remuneration of the Executive remuneration policy. remuneration matters balance is maintained between them so that
Directors and the Chairman of the Board. The In determining the policy for the Executive the need for both short-term success and
remuneration of the Non-Executive Directors The Remuneration Committee’s main Directors, the Remuneration Committee’s key long-term sustainable growth is recognised.
is the responsibility of the Board as a whole. responsibilities are to: objectives are to: The Remuneration Committee also ensures
No Director is involved in determining or that non-financial business measures and
• Develop the Company’s Remuneration • Ensure that senior executives’ remuneration individual objectives reflect adequately
voting on their own remuneration.
Policy for the Executive Directors, the is designed so as to attract, retain and the Company’s Environmental, Social and
The Chief Executive’s remuneration proposals members of the GMC and other senior motivate high quality executives in a Governance (ESG) responsibilities.
for the other members of the Group executives, covering basic salary, bonus, manner that aligns their remuneration
Management Committee, including the long-term incentives, retirement provisions with the interests of shareholders and other 2. Summary of components of
Company Secretary (GMC) are reviewed and other benefits stakeholders, particularly in the design Executive Directors’ remuneration
by the Remuneration Committee, and the • Strike an appropriate balance between: of the performance-related elements of The Remuneration Committee structures
Committee’s recommendations with regards – the fixed and variable; and their remuneration packages and their Executive Directors’ remuneration in two
to those proposals are made to the Board. shareholding guidelines distinct parts:
– the cash and equity-related components
• Promote the achievement of both the
of total remuneration packages – fixed remuneration of basic salary,
The Remuneration Committee also takes note Company’s annual and longer-term
strategic objectives. The Remuneration pension provision and benefits; and
of the remuneration policy as detailed by the • Review and determine the terms of
Chief Executive in respect of other levels of Committee considers the alignment – variable performance-related
employment and remuneration of
management in the Company and makes of Company performance and the remuneration in the form of cash
the individual Executive Directors and
such recommendations to the Chief Executive remuneration of its senior executives, bonuses, deferred share bonuses and
nominated senior management, including
as the Remuneration Committee deems including the Executive Directors, to be an long-term incentive arrangements.
any specific retirement or severance terms
appropriate. The Remuneration Committee important element of driving shareholder
• Determine the remuneration of the value. It believes that senior executives Remuneration for Executive Directors is
has regard to the proposed remuneration
Chairman of the Board should be highly rewarded (on a market- structured so that the variable performance-
policy for other management and employees
across the Group, when determining • Establish and review the operation of competitive basis) for the delivery of related pay element forms a significant
recommendations on remuneration for the any employee share plans, including the stretching goals but should also receive portion of each package. The majority of total
Executive Directors and other senior executives. granting of awards, the setting and testing reduced rewards when the business does remuneration at the maximum performance
of performance conditions and exercising of not perform to expectations level will derive from the Company’s long-
The Remuneration Committee places any awards under long-term incentive plans • Encourage Executive Directors to act term incentive arrangements. All incentives
significant focus on, and spends considerable • Review the workforce remuneration and in a fair and responsible manner without are designed to be aligned to delivery of
time reviewing the risks surrounding the related policies and the alignment of unnecessary risk-taking having regard Essentra’s strategic priorities.
Company’s existing remuneration policies incentives and reward with culture to the long-term performance of
the Company
122 THE DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION POLICY REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
3. Policy Table
Basic salary
To reflect the particular skills and experience Generally reviewed annually with any increase No absolute maximum has been set for Executive Not applicable.
of an individual and to provide a competitive normally taking effect from 1 April, although the Director base salaries.
basic salary Remuneration Committee may award increases at Any annual increase in salaries is at the discretion
other times of the year if it considers it appropriate. of the Committee taking into account the factors
The review takes into consideration a number of stated in this table and the following principles:
factors, including (but not limited to): • Salaries would typically be increased at a rate
• The individual Director’s role, experience and consistent with the average salary increase (in
performance percentage of salary terms) for the relevant
• Business performance workforce.
• Pay and conditions elsewhere in the Group • Larger increases may be considered appropriate
• Market data for comparable roles in appropriate in certain circumstances (including, but
pay comparators not limited to, a change in an individual’s
responsibilities or in the scale of their role or in
the size and complexity of the Group).
• Larger increases may also be considered
appropriate if a Director has been initially
appointed to the Board at a lower than
typical salary.
123 THE DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION POLICY REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Bonus
To ensure the delivery of Company performance- One half of the total bonus is paid in cash shortly 150% of basic salary. The bonus will be based on performance using
related objectives, aid retention and to after the announcement of the annual results. appropriate financial, strategic and individual
align Directors’ interests with those of the The other half is deferred into shares in the performance measures.
Company’s shareholders. Deferred Annual Share Bonus (“the DASB”) which The majority of the bonus will normally be
will normally vest after three years subject to determined by measure(s) of the Company’s
continued service. financial performance. The remainder of the
Performance is assessed against measures and bonus will be based on financial, strategic, ESG,
targets which are established by the Remuneration operational or other suitable business measures
Committee. As performance increases so does the appropriate to the individual Director.
percentage payable up to the maximum. No more than 20% of each financial measure will
The bonus is subject to malus and clawback vest at threshold performance.
provisions for a period of three years following
the determination of the bonus. Circumstances
in which these provisions could be applied by
the Remuneration Committee are material
misstatement in the Company’s Financial
Statements, error in assessing the performance
conditions, serious misconduct by an individual,
business failure or serious reputational damage to
the Company or a relevant business unit.
An additional payment (in the form of cash or
shares) may be made in respect of shares which
vest under deferred awards to reflect the value of
dividends which would have been paid on those
shares during the vesting period (this payment
may assume that dividends had been reinvested in
Company shares on a cumulative basis).
124 THE DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION POLICY REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
To drive the long-term delivery of the Company’s An annual grant of performance share awards An award to any Executive Director would be Vesting will be subject to performance conditions
strategic objectives, aid retention and to usually with a three-year performance and limited to a maximum of 300% of salary. as determined by the Remuneration Committee
align Directors’ interests with those of the additional two-year holding period. on an annual basis.
Company’s shareholders. Awards are subject to the LTIP plan rules, including The performance conditions will usually be some
malus and clawback provisions for a period of combination of relative TSR, adjusted EPS, adjusted
three years following the vesting of the awards. cumulative operating cash flow, ESG and a capital
Circumstances in which these provisions could return measure although the Remuneration
be applied by the Remuneration Committee are Committee will retain discretion to include
material misstatement in the Company’s Financial alternative performance measures which are
Statements, error in assessing the performance aligned to the corporate strategy.
conditions, serious misconduct by an individual, The Remuneration Committee may adjust the
business failure or serious reputational damage to weightings of the performance conditions for
the Company or a relevant business unit. each award although usually each condition
An additional payment (in the form of cash or would have a weighting in the range of 10% to
shares) may be made in respect of shares which 40% of the award.
vest under LTIP awards to reflect the value of Performance will usually be measured over a three-
dividends which would have been paid on those year period.
shares during the period up to the release of the
Up to 25% of each element vests at threshold
shares (this payment may assume that dividends
performance, usually rising on a straight-line basis
had been reinvested in Company shares on a
for performance up to the maximum level for full
cumulative basis).
payment. If below threshold performance, that
element of the award will not vest.
125 THE DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION POLICY REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
To align the interests of Executive Directors and Whilst in-employment, Executives Directors are Not applicable. Not applicable.
shareholders, encourage a focus on long-term expected to build up a shareholding worth 300%
performance and risk management. of salary for the Chief Executive and 200% for the
Chief Finance Officer. The shareholding guidelines
are to be built up by retaining 50% of post-tax
vested shares from the date of approval of this
Policy.
The Remuneration Committee will review progress
towards the guidelines on an annual basis and has
the discretion to adjust the guidelines in what it
feels are appropriate circumstances.
Executive Directors will also be expected to remain
compliant with the above guideline for a period
of two years post-employment. This guideline
will apply to shares from incentive awards due
to be released from the date of adoption of
the Policy at the 2021 AGM. The Committee
would retain discretion to waive this guideline if
it is not considered appropriate in the specific
circumstances.
Non-Executive Directors are encouraged to hold a
minimum of 7,500 shares.
126 THE DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION POLICY REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
To create alignment of employees’ interests with Under the UK Sharesave, employees (including For the UK plan, shares worth up to the value of the The Remuneration Committee agree the annual
those of shareholders. Executive Directors) are invited to enter a savings savings an Executive Director agrees to make over discount to be applied to the Sharesave schemes.
contract of three years or five years, whereby the saving period at the previously agreed option No performance conditions apply to All Employee
the proceeds can be used towards the exercise price. The savings amount is subject to the HMRC Plans.
of an option granted at the time they choose to limit, currently £500 per month.
participate. The Remuneration Committee has The US Plan is limited to the monthly dollar
the discretion to set the option price up to a 20% equivalent of the UK Sharesave plan and an option
discount on the share price at the time employees price of up to a 15% discount.
are invited to participate.
An equivalent US plan is operated aligned to the
UK plan where possible.
Pension
To provide cost-effective long-term benefits A contribution to a defined contribution plan or Any future Executive Director appointment will Not applicable.
comparable with similar roles in similar paid as a cash supplement. have a pension provision in line with the relevant
companies. workforce.
The pension provision for the current Executive
Directors will continue to be phased down to align
with the relevant workforce by the end of 2022. The
next stage in this process, effective 1 April 2021, will
see pension allowances reduced to 20% and 15% of
salary respectively for the CEO and CFO.
127 THE DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION POLICY REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Other benefits
To provide cost-effective benefits comparable Other benefits include family medical expenses, life There is no overall maximum as the level of benefits Not applicable.
with similar roles in similar companies. insurance, and car allowance. depends on the annual cost of providing individual
The Remuneration Committee may vary these benefits in the relevant local market and the
benefits from time to time to suit business needs, individual’s specific role.
but they will be provided on broadly similar terms
to those offered to other Group employees.
Executive Directors are entitled to reimbursement
of reasonable expenses.
To attract a high-calibre Chairman and Non- A basic fee is payable to the Chairman and Non- Fees for the current year are stated in the Annual Not applicable.
Executive Directors with the relevant experience Executive Directors (NED’s) with supplementary Report on Remuneration.
and skills. fees for those NED’s with additional responsibilities, Fee increases may be greater than those of
such as acting as Senior Independent Director, the wider workforce in any particular year as
chairing a Board Committee, an additional defined they reflect changes to responsibilities and
role such as a Board Employee Champion or for a time commitments and the periodic nature of
significantly increased time commitment. any increases.
Additional payments may be made to Non-
Executive Directors for time spent travelling on
Company business.
Fees are reviewed periodically with reference to
market levels in companies of a comparable
size, complexity and taking account of the
responsibilities and time commitment of each role.
The Chairman and the Non-Executive Directors
do not participate in the Group’s incentive
arrangements or pension plan or receive any other
benefits other than where travel to the Company’s
registered office is recognised as a taxable benefit
in which case the Chairman or a Non-Executive
Director may receive the grossed-up costs of travel
as a benefit.
The Chairman and non-Executive Directors are
entitled to reimbursement of reasonable expenses.
128 THE DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION POLICY REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
4. Remuneration The Remuneration Committee also retains 5. Existing awards 6. Choice of performance measures
Committee discretion the ability within the Remuneration Policy The Remuneration Committee reserves the and approach to target setting
The Remuneration Committee will operate to adjust the targets and / or set different right to make any remuneration payments The Remuneration Committee sets
the bonus plan and long-term incentive plans measures and alter weightings and the and / or payments for loss of office (including performance metrics under both the bonus
according to their respective rules and will be formulaic outcomes for the bonus plan and exercising any discretions available to plan and LTIP which are clearly aligned to
consistent with normal market practice, the LTIP, and to adjust targets for the LTIP if it in connection with such payments) the Group’s strategy and are usually part
Listing Rules and relevant income tax and events occur which cause it to determine that notwithstanding that they are not in line with of its Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
social security rules, including flexibility in a the conditions are unable to fulfil their original the Remuneration Policy 2021 (set out above) Personal objective performance measures
number of regards. These include: intended purpose. where the terms of the payment were agreed: within the bonus are also directly linked to
key strategic objectives.
• When to make awards and payments The Remuneration Committee may make – (i) before the Remuneration Policy set
minor amendments to the Remuneration Policy out above came into effect, provided Targets are set at the start of each
• How to determine the size of an award or
as set for regulatory, exchange control, tax or that the terms of the payment were performance period by the Remuneration
a payment, or when and how much of an
administrative purposes or to take account consistent with the shareholder-approved Committee taking into account relevant
award should vest
of a change in legislation, without obtaining Directors’ Remuneration Policy in force at internal and external reference points and
• Who receives an award or payment shareholder approval for that amendment. the time they were agreed; or are designed to be appropriately stretching.
• How to deal with a change of control or
– (ii) at a time when the relevant individual
restructuring of the Group
was not a Director of the Company
• Whether a participant is a good / bad leaver and, in the opinion of the Remuneration
for incentive plan purposes, and whether Committee, the payment was not in
and what proportion of awards vest and consideration for the individual becoming
timing of delivery a Director of the Company. For these
• How and whether an award (or an award purposes “payments” includes the
of shares outlined in this Policy that is yet Remuneration Committee satisfying
to be granted) may be adjusted in certain awards of variable remuneration and,
circumstances (eg rights issues, corporate in relation to an award over shares, the
restructuring, events and special dividends) terms of the payment are “agreed” at
• What the weighting, measures and targets the time the award is granted.
should be for the bonus plan and LTIP from
year to year
129 THE DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION POLICY REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Bonus
2 54% 29% 17% pay for legal fees and other costs incurred by
New appointees will be able to participate
the individual in relation to their appointment.
3 30% 32% 38%
in the bonus plan up to the limit described
in the Policy Table; and, in the first year,
Buy-out awards
4 24% 31% 45% being pro-rated to reflect the proportion
To potentially facilitate the recruitment
of employment during the year. In the first
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 through the buy-out of existing awards
year, the Remuneration Committee may set
(£000’s) and compensation arrangements from
different performance measures and targets
Assumptions: their current employer, the Remuneration
1 Salary: to be paid during 2021. for the bonus to those of the other Executive
Committee will retain the ability to make
2 Benefits: 2020 reported taxable benefits. Directors, depending on the timing and scope
3 Bonus maximum of 150% of salary for Paul Forman and 125% of salary for Lily Liu. a one-off buy-out award. In doing so,
of any appointment. In order to facilitate
4 LTIP award of 200% of salary for Paul Forman and 150% of salary for Lily Liu. the Remuneration Committee will take
5 Pension allowance assumed to be 20% for Paul Forman and 15% of salary for Lily Liu. recruitment, the Remuneration Committee
6 Meeting expectations scenario assumptions – 50% of bonus maximum paid and 25% of LTIP award vests. account of all relevant factors, including
may compensate for any bonus forgone when
7 Maximum scenarios assumptions – 100% of bonus maximum paid and 100% of LTIP award vests. any performance conditions attached to
8 No dividend accrual considered. the individual leaves their previous employer.
9 Sharesave awards have been ignored.
incentive awards, the likelihood of those
130 THE DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION POLICY REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
conditions being met, the proportion of the 9. Service contracts and exit be reduced to take into account any sums • The payment of any bonus will be at the
vesting /performance period remaining and payments earned during the payment period by way Remuneration Committee’s discretion,
the form of the award (eg, cash or shares). Service contracts normally continue until the of employment elsewhere. based on the individual circumstances
The overriding principle will be that any Director’s agreed retirement date or such • There are no enhanced provisions on a and would usually be pro-rated for
buy-out award should be of comparable other date as the parties agree. change of control. the period of service and may be paid
commercial value to the compensation which entirely in cash. In determining the level
• In certain circumstances, such as gross
has been forfeited. Buy-out awards will be • The policy for executive service contracts of bonus to be paid, the Remuneration
misconduct, the Company may terminate
made using existing incentive arrangements is that notice periods will normally not Committee may, at its discretion, take
employment immediately without notice
where possible, but it may be necessary to exceed 12 months. Paul Forman has a into account performance up to the
or payment.
use the exemption under Listing Rule 9.4.2. service contract dated 2 January 2017 and date of cessation or over the financial
Shareholders will be informed of any such • The Remuneration Committee reserves year as a whole based on appropriate
Lily Liu has a service contract dated 15
payments at the time of appointment. the right to make any other payments in performance measures as determined
November 2018, both with a notice period
connection with a Director’s cessation of by the Remuneration Committee.
of 12 months from either party. The service
In the case of internal appointments or office or employment where the payments
contracts for the Executive Directors are • Under the rules of the LTIP, outstanding
appointments following the Company’s are made in good faith in discharge of
available for inspection by shareholders awards may vest if a participant leaves
acquisition of or merger with another an existing legal obligation (or by way of
at each AGM and during normal business for specified reasons, including injury,
company or business, any variable pay damages for breach of such an obligation)
hours at the Company’s registered office. disability, ill health, death, retirement with
element or legacy arrangements in respect or by way of a compromise or settlement
• The Remuneration Committee’s policy the Company’s agreement, redundancy,
of the prior role would normally be allowed of any claim arising in connection with
in relation to termination of service or the business or company in which the
to pay-out according to its terms, adjusted the cessation of a Director’s office or
contracts is to apply an appropriate level participant is employed ceasing to be part
as relevant, to take into account the employment.
of mitigation, having regard to all of of the Group or on a change of control.
appointment. • Any such payments may include, but In these circumstances a participant’s
the circumstances of the individual, the
are not limited to, paying any fees for award vests on an appropriate time pro
Non-Executive Directors termination of employment, and to any
outplacement assistance and / or the rata basis (unless the Remuneration
In the event of the appointment of a new legal advice received. The Company has the
Director’s legal and / or professional advice Committee decides it is inappropriate to
Non-Executive Director, remuneration right to make a payment in lieu of notice
fees in connection with their cessation of do so) subject to the satisfaction of the
arrangements will normally be in line with (such payment being made based on salary
office or employment. relevant performance criteria at the normal
the structure set out in the Policy Table for and at the Remuneration Committee’s
discretion as to the value of benefits), • The service contract for any new vesting date with the balance of the award
Non-Executive Directors. In the event that appointment would be on a similar basis to
and any such payment may be made in lapsing. The Remuneration Committee
a Non-Executive Director is required to that described above.
monthly instalments at the Company’s has discretion to determine that the
temporarily take on the role of an Executive
discretion, with a requirement for the performance period should end on the date
Director, their remuneration may include any
individual to make reasonable endeavours of cessation of employment if it feels this is
of the elements listed in the Policy Table for
to find alternative employment and may appropriate. If, however, the termination of
Executive Directors.
employment is not for one of the specified
131 THE DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION POLICY REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
reasons, and the Remuneration Committee 11. Relationship between Essentra currently manages a number of 13. External appointments
does not exercise its discretion to allow remuneration of Executive Directors employee forums including sessions with the Essentra recognises its senior executives can
an award to vest, a participant’s award and other employees two Employee Champions, and with specific benefit from serving in a personal capacity
lapses in full on the date of cessation. The The Remuneration Committee is kept groups covering diversity and inclusion, as Non-Executive Directors of non-Essentra
Committee retains discretion to allow the informed of pay and employment conditions employee engagement focus groups, Group companies. It is, at the same time,
holding period for vested awards to expire in the wider Group and this is factored into leadership team sessions and other focus conscious of the corporate governance
at the end of the normal two year period or, deliberations when setting the Remuneration groups. Executive pay is a regular item for recommendations that Executive Directors
if appropriate, at an earlier date. Policy for Executive Directors. The Group-wide these forums. should take account of the time commitment
• The DASB awards may vest if a participant salary increase budget and the proposed required by a non-executive position.
leaves for specified reasons including increase for permanent employees in the 12. How the views of shareholders are Executive Directors are permitted to accept
death, the business or company in which relevant markets, or employees of such taken into account non-executive directorships offered by listed
the participant is employed ceasing to other jurisdiction within which the Executive The Remuneration Committee has consulted companies and other organisations, which
be part of the Group, retirement with Directors operate or reside, is considered with major shareholders and investor bodies provide industry experience or public service.
the agreement of the Company or at the by the Remuneration Committee when in the past when material changes to the Such outside appointments are subject to
discretion of the Board. DASB awards will determining any basic salary increase for Policy have been proposed, and this approach prior Board approval, taking into account
either vest on the normal vesting date or at Executive Directors. will continue in the future with the overall existing duties, potential conflicts of interest
the point of the participant leaving date if aim to maintain an open and transparent and time commitments outside of Essentra’s
deemed a good leaver by the Remuneration As stated previously, the overall remuneration dialogue. A thorough consultation process responsibilities. Any fees earned from these
Committee. package for Executive Directors is structured was undertaken with our major shareholders roles may be retained by the Executive Director.
so that the variable performance-related pay and representative bodies before this updated
10. Non-Executive Directors element forms a more significant portion Policy Report was submitted for the approval
The Chairman and Non-Executive Directors compared to pay for other employees. of all shareholders.
do not have service contracts and do not This policy is to ensure there is a clear link
participate in any Company pension, share between the individual and corporate
or incentive schemes. In accordance with performance achieved, the value this creates
best practice, letters of appointment have for shareholders and the overall reward to
been issued for all Non-Executive Directors Executive Directors. The weighting of variable
for an initial period of three years but may pay will vary throughout the Group based
be terminated by either party with three on the seniority of the individual, the role
months’ notice. No compensation is payable and specific responsibilities. The Essentra
on termination, except for fees and expenses Management Bonus Plan also provides
accrued to date. These letters are available a consistent approach for the Executive
for inspection by shareholders at each AGM Directors and Managers within Essentra by
and during normal business hours at the aligning the same performance conditions
Company’s registered office. for their bonus plans.
132 THE DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION POLICY REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Key activities
Membership and attendance
Remuneration Committee 2020 key activities
Meetings during the year Meetings during 2020
Nicki Demby, Non-Executive Director 6 (6)
Q1 2020
Tommy Breen, Non-Executive Director 6 (6)
• Approved 2019 annual bonus out turn for Executive Directors and
Mary Reilly, Non-Executive Director 6 (6)
GMC members.
Ralf Wunderlich, Non-Executive Director 6 (6)
• Approved performance measures and targets for the 2020 annual
Lorraine Trainer , Non-Executive Director
1
1 (2)
bonus of Executive Directors and GMC members.
1 Lorraine Trainer left the Remuneration Committee in May 2020. She missed the February 2020 Committee meeting due to illness.
• Approved the 2017 LTIP out turn for Executive Directors and other
Other attendees
During the year, the Chairman, Chief Executive, Chief Financial Officer, Group Human Resources Director and Director of
senior management.
Reward were invited by the Remuneration Committee to provide views and advice. None participated in discussions regarding • Reviewed 2019 Directors’ Remuneration Report for inclusion in the
their own remuneration.
2020 Annual Report.
The Company Secretary and General Counsel acts as Secretary to the Remuneration Committee.
Q2 2020
In addition, services and advice were received from the following independent and expert • Considered remuneration issues in relation to COVID-19: 20% reduction in
consultants: base salaries and fees for Directors and GMC for 3 months, withdrawal of
inflationary salary increase for Executive Directors and no 2020 LTIP award.
• Deloitte LLP (Deloitte), who are a member of the Remuneration Consultants Group and have • Discussed the Directors’ Remuneration Policy and possible changes.
signed up to its Code of Conduct, provided advice to the Remuneration Committee on the
draft Directors’ Remuneration Policy, the 2018 Code, the Company’s incentive plans, and on Q3 2020
the remuneration of the Executive Directors and other senior executives within the Company. • Discussed draft changes to the Directors’ Remuneration Policy and
Deloitte were appointed by the Remuneration Committee who review their performance shareholder consultation process.
annually, and are content with the continued advice and level of service provided. The • Considered the impact of the share placing on share plans.
Remuneration Committee continues to be satisfied with the level of independence. Fees
charged for the year under review are £77,650. The fees are charged on a time and expenses Q4 2020
basis. Deloitte also provided other remuneration, consulting and tax services to the Company • Considered adjusting the 2018 LTIP outturn for M&A activity during
during 2020. the performance period.
• New Bridge Street, a part of Aon Hewitt, who are a member of the Remuneration • Considered the design of the 2021 annual bonus for Executive Directors
Consultants Group and have signed up to its Code of Conduct, provided advice on the and GMC.
Company’s long-term share incentive plans including the calculation of the TSR LTIP • Considered the design of the 2021 LTIP for Executive Directors and other
performance measure. Fees charged for the year under review are £13,404. The fees are senior management.
charged on a time and expenses basis. The Remuneration Committee continues to be
• Discussed shareholder feedback from consultations on the Directors’
satisfied with the advice provided and level of independence. Aon Hewitt also provided
Remuneration Policy.
actuarial advice to the Company for its USA pension scheme and are appointed as the
Group’s insurance broker. • Reviewed the draft 2020 Directors’ Remuneration Report.
• The Remuneration Committee continuously monitors and reviews the Company’s • Reviewed Executive Directors and GMC share ownership.
relationships with its independent advisers.
133 THE DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION POLICY REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
This section of the Remuneration Report will be subject to an advisory vote at the 2021 AGM.
Salary and
fees for the Bonus
year or from Cash in (cash and Long-Term
the date of Taxable lieu of Total fixed deferred Incentive Total variable
appointment benefits¹ pension2 remuneration shares) Plan3 remuneration Other Total
Year £0008 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000
Executive Directors
Paul Forman 2020 611 37 1529 800 – – – 800
2019 639 37 160 836 288 172 460 1,296
Lily Liu 2020 330 14 649 408 – – – 408
2019 327 33 65 425 114 – 114 57 544
Non-Executive Directors
Paul Lester 2020 238 – – 238 – – – 238
2019 250 – – 250 – – – 250
Tommy Breen 2020 59 – – 59 – – – 59
2019 61 – – 61 – – – 61
Lorraine Trainer4 2020 24 – – 24 – – – 24
2019 64 – – 64 – – – 64
Mary Reilly 2020 71 – – 71 – – – 71
2019 77 – – 77 – – – 77
Ralf Wunderlich5 2020 69 – – 69 – – – 69
2019 57 – – 57 – – – 57
Nicki Demby6 2020 57 – – 57 – – – 57
2019 30 – – 30 – – – 30
Totals 2020 1,459 51 216 1,726 – – – – 1,726
Totals 2019 1,505 70 225 1,800 402 172 574 5 2,379
1 Taxable benefits comprise a car allowance, private medical insurance and life insurance cover.
2 Neither Paul Forman nor Lily Liu are entitled to any benefit under the Essentra Defined Benefit Pension Scheme.
3 The 2018 LTIP lapsed as the minimum performance conditions were not met. The 2017 LTIP value for Paul Forman has been restated based on the share price on the date of vesting (8 September 2020) of 293.2p.
4 Lorraine Trainer stepped down from the Board in May 2020 at the AGM.
5 Ralf Wunderlich was appointed as a Board Employee Champion in November 2019.
6 Nicki Demby was appointed Chair of the Remuneration Committee in May 2020 at the AGM.
7 Sharesave grant on 3 April 2019. This figure is the difference between the exercise price and the share price at the date of grant.
8 Due to COVID-19 all Directors had a 20% reduction in salary and fees for three months.
9 Paul Forman’s pension allowance was reduced to 23.1% of salary at 1 April 2020. Lily Liu’s pension allowance was reduced to 18% of salary as at 1 April 2020.
134 THE DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION POLICY REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
The salary for the employees at the above percentiles are typical salaries for performing operational roles in our factories. The roles at these quartiles are a Customer Service Representative,
Digital Team Leader and Lead Maintenance Engineer. The majority of remuneration for these roles is fixed rather than performance linked. The ratios are calculated based on the total
remuneration payable to the Chief Executive in respect of 2020, as set out in the single figure table above.
The CEO pay ratio for 2020 has reduced to 30:1 at the median. This reflects the three month salary reduction that the CEO voluntarily agreed in order to help fund the furlough payments for our
employees globally, that no annual bonus was paid for 2020 and that none of the 2018 LTIP awards vested.
The CEO pay ratio will fluctuate year-on-year, reflecting the higher proportion of variable remuneration that the Chief Executive may receive relative to other employees, the value of which is
dependent on Essentra’s performance and share price movements. As a result, the Remuneration Committee does not believe it is appropriate to target a specific CEO pay ratio. However, the
Committee will annually assess whether the year-on-year movement in the ratio is consistent with Company performance and employee reward decisions.
For the year ended 31 December 2020, the performance measures for the Executive Directors were Adjusted Operating Profit (40%), Operating Cash Flow (30%) and Strategic Objectives (30%).
No bonuses are payable unless 85% of the Target Adjusted Operating Profit is achieved.
135 THE DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION POLICY REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
1 No bonus is payable under any performance measure as a result of missing 85% of the target Adjusted Operating Profit.
At the start of the year, the Committee set a stretching range for Adjusted Operating Profit and Adjusted Operating Cash Flow based on the original financial forecast for 2020. The Adjusted
Operating Profit and Adjusted Operating Cash Flow targets were not changed for the economic impact of COVID-19.
In the Committee’s view, the Executive Directors delivered a resilient financial performance despite the significant economic downturn. Many of the key strategic objectives set for the year were
also successfully achieved. However, due to missing the underpin Adjusted Operating Profit Target, there was no payment due to the Executive Directors under either the 30% strategic element
or the 70% financial element of the bonus.
In determining the outcome of the annual bonus for 2020 the Remuneration Committee gave careful consideration to exercising its discretion including a number of matters not addressed
by the mechanics of the plan. The Remuneration Committee has taken a thoughtful and balanced view and in the round we have determined that the overall outcome of the annual bonus
is appropriate.
3 year Relative TSR v FTSE250 (exc investment trusts) (33.33%) Median Upper quartile Below median 0%
3 year Compound Annual Growth in Adjusted EPS (33.33%) 6% 15% -16.9% 0%
3 year Cumulative Adjusted Operating Cash Flow (33.33%) £252m £292m £225.3m 0%
At the conclusion of the performance period, the Remuneration Committee discussed whether any discretion should be applied to the formulaic outturn of the LTIP. In conclusion, the Committee
was comfortable that the formulaic vesting outturn of 0% of maximum was fair and reasonable, and was satisfied that adjusting for M&A activity during the three year performance period
would make no difference to the formulaic outturn.
136 THE DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION POLICY REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Paul Forman
LTIP1 8 Sept 17 387,076 – 58,496 328,580 – 529.0p 8 Sept 20 7 Sept 23
LTIP1 6 Apr 18 292,877 – – – 292,877 426.8p 6 Apr 21 6 Apr 24
LTIP1 13 Aug 19 321,241 – – – 321,241 400.4p 15 Aug 22 13 Aug 25
DASB 29 Mar 18 52,059 – – – 52,059 432.2p 1 Mar 21 1 Mar 21
DASB 29 Mar 19 74,342 – – – 74,342 413.0p 1 Mar 22 1 Mar 22
DASB 30 Mar 202 56,840 – – 56,840 253.4p 1 Mar 23 1 Mar 23
Lily Liu
LTIP1 13 Aug 19 205,594 – – 205,594 400.4p 15 Aug 22 13 Aug 25
DASB 30 Mar 203 – 22,642 – – 22,642 253.4p 1 Mar 23 1 Mar 23
A total of 174,389 (2019: 1,529,082) share incentive awards were granted during the year ended 31 December 2020 to Executive Directors and other senior executives on the GMC, all relating to
the DASB awards on annual bonuses earned in 2019.
There have been no changes in the Directors’ interests since 31 December 2020 and the date of this Report.
Executive Directors
Paul Forman 260,000 308,461 58,496 614,118 183,241 –
Lily Liu – 19,230 – 205,594 22,642 5,503
Non-Executive Directors
Paul Lester 7,500 11,346 – – – –
Tommy Breen 10,000 13,846 – – – –
Lorraine Trainer 9,092 9,092 – – – –
Ralf Wunderlich 136,000 170,230 – – – –
Mary Reilly 7,500 9,423 – – – –
Nicki Demby 750 2,673 – – – –
Paul Forman and Lily Liu are required to build up a shareholding worth 300% and 200% of salary respectively from the date of appointment. Beneficially owned shares include the unvested DASB
awards and shares held directly. Current holdings as a percentage of salary are 262% for Paul Forman and 36% for Lily Liu.
The Executive Directors are regarded as being interested in 1,084,091 (2019: 1,033,311) ordinary shares in Essentra plc currently held by the Essentra Employee Benefit Trust (EBT) as they are,
together with other Essentra employees, potential beneficiaries of the EBT.
As at 31 December 2020, potential and actual share issuance through employee related share plans totalled 1.65%, which is well below UK institutional shareholder limits of 10% of the Company’s
issued share capital.
138 THE DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION POLICY REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
This graph shows the value, by 31 December 2020, of £100 invested in Essentra on 31 December 2010, compared with the value of £100 invested in the FTSE 250 (excl. Investment Trusts) Index.
The other points plotted are the values at intervening financial year-ends.
£
500
400
300
200
100
0
Dec 2010 Dec 2011 Dec 2012 Dec 2013 Dec 2014 Dec 2015 Dec 2016 Dec 2017 Dec 2018 Dec 2019 Dec 2020
Essentra
FTSE 250 (excluding investment trusts) index
139 THE DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION POLICY REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
1 Jan – 14 Apr 11 1 Apr –31 Dec 11 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Total remuneration (£000) 1,715 1,046 1,570 3,824 5,661 2,281 876 1,267 1,420 1,296 800
Annual bonus
(% maximum) 100 100 100 100 60 46.2 0 48 64.2 30.2 0
LTIP vesting
(% maximum) 100 n/a n/a 100 100 50 0 0 0 13.53 0
Mark Harper retired on 14 April 2011 and Colin Day was appointed as a Director on 1 April 2011. Colin Day retired as Chief Executive on 31 December 2016 and Paul Forman was appointed as Chief
Executive on 1 January 2017.
Year-on-year change in pay for Directors compared to the average of employees (unaudited)
In line with the requirements in The Companies (Directors’ Remuneration Policy and Directors’ Remuneration Report) Regulations 2019, which implement Articles 9a and 9b of the European
Directive 2017/828/EC1 (commonly known as the Revised Shareholder Rights Directive), the table below shows the percentage change in Directors’ remuneration and average remuneration
of employees from the year ended 31 December 2019 to the year ended 31 December 2020. Given the small number of people employed by the Essentra Plc entity, data for all employees of the
Essentra Group has been included.
There were no salary increases in 2020 except for statutory and negotiated increases and a few market rate adjustments on an exceptional basis. As a result, the average salary increase
is 1.7% from 2019 to 2020. Average bonuses have fallen due to the economic impact of the COVID-19 on the Group’s financial performance.
The increase in fees for Nicki Demby and Ralf Wunderlich reflect their respective appointments to the Board in 2019, and as Chair of the Remuneration Committee in 2020 and appointment
as Board Employee Champion in November 2019.
Salary / Fees +1.7% -4.3% +0.9% -4.8% -3.3% -62.5% +21% -7.8% +90%
Benefits +4.7% 0% -57.6% n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Bonus -73.3% -100% -100% n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
1 The average employee salary is based on all global employees. The average employee benefits and bonus are based on employees located in the UK and USA. The differing approach reflects the information held in global systems.
140 THE DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION POLICY REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Clarity We provide open and transparent disclosures both internally and externally in relation to our executive remuneration arrangements.
Simplicity Variable remuneration arrangements for our executives and our wider workforce are simple in nature with individuals eligible for a bonus and, at more senior levels, a single long-term incentive plan.
These are well understood by both participants and shareholders.
Predictability Our executive remuneration framework contains maximum opportunity levels for each component of remuneration with variable incentive outcomes varying depending on the level of performance
achieved against specific measures.
Alignment to culture The performance measures used for annual bonus and LTIP awards are KPIs that drive behaviours that are closely aligned to our strategy and Company values. In 2021 the LTIP will include a
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions measure and the strategic objectives will include a reduction of waste to landfill target.
Proportionality and risk The Committee believes that our variable pay structures provide a fair and proportionate link between Company performance and reward. In particular, the use for Executive Directors of annual
bonus deferral, LTIP holding periods and shareholding requirements provide a clear link to the ongoing performance of the Company and therefore long-term alignment with stakeholders. For
example, under the proposed Directors’ Remuneration Policy, the shareholding guideline for Executive Directors continues two years after leaving Essentra.
We are also satisfied that the variable pay structures do not encourage inappropriate risk-taking.
Notwithstanding this, the Committee retains an overriding discretion that allows it to adjust formulaic outcomes from incentive plans so as to guard against disproportionate outturns. Malus and
clawback provisions also apply to both the annual bonus and LTIP.
Salary
Basic salary for each Executive Director is determined by the Remuneration Committee, taking into account the role, responsibilities, performance, experience of the individual and market
movement. Any salary change is normally effective in April each year.
Paul Lily
Forman Liu
£ £
Benefits
Executive Directors are provided with the following benefits:
• car allowance
• private medical insurance with family level cover
• life assurance cover of four times basic salary
Pension
Paul Forman’s pension allowance was reduced by £11,900 from 1 April 2020. He currently receives a pension allowance equal to 23.1% of base salary. Lily Liu’s cash allowance in lieu of pension was
reduced by £2,100 from 1 April 2020. She currently receives a pension allowance equal to 18% of base salary.
From 1 April 2021, pension allowances will be further reduced to 20% and 15% of salary respectively for Paul Forman and Lily Liu. This continues the phased approach to align with the wider
workforce by the end of 2022.
The measures and weightings for the annual bonus for 2021 will be consistent with those in 2020:
Weighting
Measures (%)
In 2021, there will be no bonus payable unless the Remuneration Committee determines that the Company’s 2021 financial performance is satisfactory. For achieving threshold Adjusted Operating
Profit and Adjusted Operating Cash Flow, 10% of the relevant portion of the bonus will be payable. Progress against Zero Waste to Landfill will be reviewed by the Sustainability Committee.
142 THE DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION POLICY REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
The Remuneration Committee believes that Adjusted Operating Profit and Adjusted Operating Cash Flow targets are commercially sensitive, and will not disclose the targets on a prospective
basis. The targets and actual performance against them will be disclosed on a retrospective basis in the 2021 Remuneration Report.
The Remuneration Committee has the discretion, within a three-year period after the determination of the bonus, to withhold or recover annual cash bonuses or DASB awards through malus
and clawback provisions in specified circumstances.
These circumstances take into account where the original bonus was overpaid, due to a material misstatement in the Company’s Financial Statements or due to an error in assessing the
applicable performance conditions or if there has been serious misconduct by an individual, if there has been serious reputational damage to the Company or a relevant business unit,
or in the event of corporate failure.
2021 LTIP
An award granted under the LTIP consists of a conditional right to receive shares in the Company, subject to satisfaction of performance conditions over a three-year period. An additional
two-year holding period applies. Malus and clawback provisions also apply to LTIP awards for three years from vesting.
The following LTIP awards are intended to be granted to Executive Directors during 2021.
Paul Lily
Condition Forman Liu
Threshold
Condition (25% Vesting) Maximum
1 FTSE 250 excluding companies in the following industries: basic materials, energy, financial services, real estate, utilities and travel and leisure.
2 Adjusted EPS and ROIC are subject to adjustment from portfolio management/changes.
3 Externally audited Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions consistent with our publicly stated commitment to be carbon neutral by 2040, and an interim reduction of 25% by 2025 relative to a 2019 baseline.
143 THE DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION POLICY REPORT CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
All Non-Executive Directors had a 20% fee reduction for 3 months from 1 April to 30 June 2020. There will be no change to Non-Executive Directors’ fees in 2021. No individual was present for the
discussion related to their fees.
Additional
Additional fee for Additional Additional
Non- fee for Senior Audit and fee for fee for
Executive Independent Remuneration Sustainability Employee
Annual fee effective Chairman Director Director Committee chairs Committee chair Champions
No. of No. of
votes % votes %
This Report of the Remuneration Committee has been approved by the Board
By order of
Nicki Demby
Non-Executive Director
Remuneration Committee Chairman
5 March 2021
144 OTHER STATUTORY INFORMATION ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
OTHER STATUTORY
Directors Share capital
As at 31 December 2020 and the date of the The issued share capital of the Company
INFORMATION
Report, the Board of Directors comprised: is shown in note 20 of the Notes to the
Financial Statements.
Paul Lester Non-Executive Chairman
Paul Forman Chief Executive On 31 December 2020, there were
Lily Liu Chief Financial Officer 302,590,708 ordinary shares of 25p each in
Tommy Breen Non-Executive Director issue. There were 908,650 ordinary shares
Nicki Demby Non-Executive Director
of 25p each held in treasury. The rights and
obligations attaching to the Company’s
Mary Reilly Non-Executive Director
The Directors present their Report prepared Results and dividends ordinary shares, and the provisions governing
in accordance with the Companies Act 2006, Ralf Wunderlich Non-Executive Director
The profit on ordinary activities after taxation of the appointment and replacement of, as well
which requires the Company to provide a fair the total Group for the year ended 31 December as the powers of, the Company’s Directors,
review of the business of the Group during the 2020 was £6.3m (2019: profit £41.2m). The Company requires all Directors appointed are set out in the Company’s Articles of
financial year ended 31 December 2020 and since the last AGM to be elected at the Association, copies of which can be obtained
audited Financial Statements of the Company The Company did not pay a dividend in 2020 following AGM and for all other directors to from Companies House in the UK or by
and its subsidiary undertakings for the year following a decision by the Board to preserve be re-elected at each AGM. Tommy Breen has writing to the Company Secretary.
ended 31 December 2020. The Company’s cash in view of the global pandemic and the confirmed that he will retire from the Board
Registered Office is Avebury House, 201-249 uncertainties that created. from the close of the 2021 AGM and will not There are no restrictions on the voting
Avebury Boulevard, Milton Keynes MK9 1AU. stand for re-election. rights attaching to the Company’s ordinary
Per share Total shares or on the transfer of securities in the
p £m
In accordance with the UK Financial Conduct None of the Non-Executive Directors have Company, except, in the case of transfers
Authority’s Listing Rules (LR 9.8.4C), the Interim dividend – – service contracts. In accordance with the
paid 30 October of securities:
information to be included in the Annual 2020 Company’s Conflict of Interests policy,
Report and Accounts, where applicable, under Directors are required to review their potential • that certain restrictions may from time to
LR 9.8.4 is set out in the Directors’ Report. conflict of interests at least on an annual time be imposed by laws and regulations
The Directors recommend that a final
basis and to notify any changes to the (for example, insider trading laws)
The Directors’ Report comprises pages 81 to dividend of 3.3p (2019: 6.3p) per share be
Company Secretary and General Counsel • whereby, pursuant to the Listing Rules of
148, and where information has been included paid. No interim year dividend was paid for
as soon as possible. During 2020 the current the Financial Conduct Authority, certain
in the Strategic Report sections of the 2020 therefore the total dividend distribution
register was approved at each Board meeting employees of the Company require
Annual Report this has been incorporated by for the year is 3.3p (2019: 6.3p).
and no material conflicts of interest were approval of the Company to deal in the
reference are as set out below: identified during the year.
The final dividend, subject to shareholders Company’s ordinary shares
Membership of Board during 2020 page 85 approval at the AGM, will be paid on
At no time during the year has any Director No persons hold securities in the Company
financial year 1 June 2021 to shareholders on the register
had any material interest in a contract with carrying special rights with regard to control
Financial instruments and financial pages 45 to 47 on 23 April 2021.
risk management
the Group, being a contract of significance in of the Company. The Company is not aware
relation to the Group’s business. A statement of any agreements between holders of
CO2 emissions page 41
of Directors’ interests in shares of the securities that may result in restrictions on the
Corporate Governance Report pages 85 to 99
Company as at 31 December 2020 and as at transfer of securities or on voting rights.
Future developments of the business
of the Group pages 42 to 44
the date of this Report is shown on page 137.
Employee diversity page 34 Unless expressly specified to the contrary in
Stakeholder Engagement pages 23 to 26
the Articles of Association of the Company,
the Company’s Articles of Association may
be amended by special resolution of the
Company’s shareholders.
145 OTHER STATUTORY INFORMATION CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Substantial shareholders Directors’ indemnities All of the Company’s share schemes contain At this year’s AGM, shareholders will be
As at 31 December 2020 the Company During the year, and as at the date of this provisions relating to a change in control. asked to grant the Directors’ authority to
was advised of the following voting rights Report, qualifying third-party indemnities are Outstanding options and awards normally allot shares or grant rights to subscribe
attaching to the Company’s shares in in force under which the Company has agreed vest and become exercisable on a change for or convert any security into shares: (i)
accordance with the Disclosure and to indemnify the Directors and the Company of control, subject to the satisfaction of any up to an aggregate nominal amount of
Transparency Rules: Secretary and General Counsel, in addition performance conditions at that time. £25,140,172 representing approximately
to other senior executives who are Directors one-third of the Company’s issued share
% holding
of subsidiaries of the Company, to the extent There are a number of other agreements, capital, excluding treasury shares, at 5 March
Invesco 6.64% permitted by law and the Company’s Articles involving the Company or its subsidiaries, 2021 (such an amount to be reduced by the
of Association, in respect of all losses arising that take effect, alter or terminate upon a nominal amount allotted or granted under
RLAM 5.99%
out of or in connection with the execution change of control of the Company following section (ii) below in excess of such sum);
Majedie 5.18%
of their powers, duties and responsibilities a takeover bid, such as commercial contracts and (ii) comprising equity securities up to an
Ninety One UK Limited 5.02%
as a Director or Officer of the Company or and Joint Venture agreements. None are aggregate nominal amount of £50,280,343
Ameriprise Financial, Inc. and its group 4.98%
any of its subsidiaries, including the pension considered to be significant in terms of their representing approximately two-thirds of
Standard Life 4.82%
scheme trustee companies. The scope of the potential impact on the business of the Group the issued share capital, excluding treasury
Heronbridge 4.81% indemnities extends to include liabilities to as a whole, to any potential bidder for the shares, at 5 March 2021 (such an amount to
third parties. Company or Group. be reduced by any allotments or grants made
AXA 4.81%
under section (i) above) in connection with
Norge Bank 3.02%
Significant agreements Annual General Meeting an offer by way of a rights issue.
Kames Capital 2.99%
The Company has committed bank facilities The AGM of the Company will be held at
Essentra Components site at Langford Locks, The proposal conforms to the guidelines
Employees provided by a group of eight banks, dated
Kidlington, Oxford, OX5 1HX on 20 May 2021 issued by the institutional investment
November 2017, consisting of two five-year
As at 31 December 2020, the Company at 12 noon. The meeting will be held as a protection bodies to ensure that existing
multi-currency revolving credit facilities of
employed 7,065 people globally and 1,280 virtual meeting and physical attendance will shareholders’ interests are safeguarded.
£285m and €100.8m, set to mature in its
people in the UK. Information on the only be possible if UK government regulations The Directors have no present intention of
entirety in November 2022. For a tranche
Group’s policies on employee recruitment, in place at the time permit this. Any updates exercising either of these authorities, which
involving five of the eight banks worth £225m,
engagement and the employment of disabled will be posted on the Company‘s website and will expire at the end of next year’s AGM (or,
an extension has been agreed to the facility
persons can be found in “A winning, engaged shareholders are asked to check the website if earlier, the close of business on 21 July 2021)
based on new terms, which will now mature
and empowered team” from page 31 to 35. in the approach to the AGM. Details of how except in relation to share options.
in November 2023. The Company continues
to review its financing, including the lenders to join the AGM can be found in the Notice of
Political contributions Annual General Meeting. Allotment of shares for cash
in the original tranche still set to mature in
In line with Group policy, the Company made November 2022. At the 2020 AGM, shareholders approved a
no political contributions (2019: £nil). In addition to the ordinary business of the special resolution to enable the Directors to
Under the terms of these facilities, the AGM, resolutions in respect of the following allot shares for cash without first offering
Environmental banks can give notice to Essentra to repay matters of special business are included in the them to existing shareholders in proportion
outstanding amounts and cancel the Notice of Annual General Meeting: to their existing shareholdings. That approval
The disclosures concerning CO2 emissions
required by law are included in Class-leading commitments where there is a change of expires at the end of the forthcoming AGM
Authority to allot unissued shares and resolutions 13 and 14 in the Notice of
sustainability on page 41. control of the Company.
At the 2020 AGM, the Directors were granted AGM seek to renew it.
authority to allot relevant securities up to a
nominal amount of £21,931,502, which expires
at the end of the forthcoming AGM.
146 OTHER STATUTORY INFORMATION CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
As per previous years, the Company seeks At this year’s AGM, the Directors consider Proposed amendment to the Articles Going concern statement
a resolution which authorises disapplication of pre- it expedient to seek shareholders’ approval of Association At 31 December 2020, the Group’s financing
emption rights in respect of up to an aggregate to enable the Company to purchase, in In order that the Company can best engage arrangements amounted to £448.0m,
nominal amount of £3,771,026 (representing the market, up to 10% of its issued share with shareholders at its AGM, the Notice comprising United States Private Placement
15,084,103 ordinary shares). This aggregate capital (excluding any treasury shares) for of AGM includes a resolution to amend (USPP) of US$100.0m (with a range of
nominal amount represents approximately 5% of cancellation, or to be held in Treasury, such the Articles of Association so that hybrid expiry dates from November 2024 to April
the issued ordinary share capital of the Company power to apply until the end of next year’s meetings can be held. Approval of this will 2030) and a multi-currency revolving credit
(excluding treasury shares). AGM (or if earlier, 21 July 2022). In accordance allow the Company to hold both a physical facility (RCF) of £375.0m (of which £225.0m
with the requirements of the Listing Rules of and virtual meeting simultaneously and for expires in November 2023 following extension
In addition to the above Resolution, the the Financial Conduct Authority, the minimum electronic votes to be counted. Further details agreed with lenders in January 2023, and the
Company seeks a Resolution which authorises price (exclusive of expenses) which may be of the proposed amendments can be found remaining amount in November 2022).
disapplication of pre-emption rights in respect paid for a share is its nominal value and the in the Notice of AGM. The Board support the
of up to an aggregate nominal amount of maximum price (exclusive of expenses) for adoption of this amendment to the Articles. At 31 December 2020, £161.2m of the RCF
£3,771,026 (representing 15,084,103 ordinary shares which may be paid is the highest of: facility was undrawn. The facility is subject to
shares) in connection with acquisitions and (i) an amount equal to 105% of the average External Auditor two covenants, which are tested semi-annually:
other capital investments as contemplated market value for a share for the five business net debt to EBITDA (leverage) and EBITA to net
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP have expressed
by the Pre-Emption Group’s Statement of days immediately preceding the date of the finance charges. Despite the macroeconomic
their willingness to continue to be appointed
Principles. This aggregate nominal amount purchase; and (ii) the higher of the price of the uncertainty, the Group has not sought to
as External Auditor of the Company. Upon
represents an additional 5% of the issued last independent trade and the highest current change either of the two covenants. The
the recommendation of the Audit and Risk
ordinary share capital of the Company independent bid on the trading venues where Directors believe that the Group is well placed
Committee, resolutions to appoint them
(excluding treasury shares). the purchase is carried out. to manage its business risks notwithstanding
as External Auditor and to authorise the
Directors to determine their remuneration the impact of current events such as Brexit
These authorities will expire at the conclusion The Directors have no present intention of and, after making enquiries including a review
of the following AGM or, if earlier, on 21 July will be proposed at the AGM.
exercising the authority to make market of forecasts and predictions, taking account
2022. The proposal conforms to the guidelines purchases, however the authority provides
issued by the institutional investment
Recommendation of reasonably possible changes in trading
the flexibility to allow them to do so in the performances and considering the existing
protection bodies to ensure that existing future. The Directors will only utilise this The Directors believe that the resolutions in
banking facilities, including the available
shareholders’ interests are safeguarded. authority if satisfied that to do so would be the Notice of Annual General Meeting are
liquidity, have a reasonable expectation that
in the best interests of the Company and in the best interests of the Company and its
the Group has adequate resources to continue
Purchase of own shares its shareholders generally, and could be shareholders as a whole, and unanimously
in operational existence for at least the next
At the 2020 AGM, shareholders approved a expected to result in an increase in earnings recommend that shareholders vote in favour
12 months following the date of approval of
special resolution to enable the Company to per share of the Company. of each resolution.
the financial statements, and no breaches of
purchase its own shares. That approval expires covenants are expected.
at the end of the forthcoming AGM. During the financial year ending 31 December Derivatives
2020, 42,487 ordinary shares were transferred Information related to derivatives is included The uncertainty as to the future impact on the
out of Treasury by the Company to satisfy in the Accounting Policies on page 157 and Group of the COVID-19 pandemic has been
share options under the Company’s Sharesave in note 15 and note 19 to the Notes of the considered as part of the Group’s adoption of
and executive share incentive plans. Financial Statements. the going concern basis, taking into account
the experience during 2020 and the most recent
No dividends have been paid on shares while
held in Treasury and no voting rights attach to
the treasury shares.
147 OTHER STATUTORY INFORMATION CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
circumstances. As at 31 December 2020 and The severe but plausible scenario does not In late February 2021, OFAC confirmed that The assessment has been based on the
as at the date of approval of these financial indicate a material uncertainty which may no further enforcement action would be taken Company’s strategy and implementation
statements, all of the Group’s manufacturing cast significant doubt over the Company’s and against the Company or its subsidiaries in programme, balance sheet and financing
and distribution facilities are operational and Group’s ability to continue as a going concern. respect of supplementary matters raised with position, and the potential impact of the key
have broadly resumed to pre-pandemic levels Therefore, the Directors continue to adopt the OFAC in 2020. risks and uncertainties described above. The
of service. Across the Group, public health going concern basis of accounting in preparing Company strategy has been translated into
measures advised by governments are being the financial statements. In accordance with Provision 31 of the 2018 a three-year strategic plan comprising a one-
followed in support of their efforts to contain UK Corporate Governance Code, the Directors year detailed budget and a financial forecast
the spread of the virus, and the supply chain is Further information on the Group’s borrowing have assessed the longer-term viability of for the following two years. The plan will be
being proactively managed as are operating facilities, cash resources and other financial the Company over the three-year period subject to annual updates by management
costs and the timing of capital expenditure. instruments are described in the Financial to December 2023. and review by the Board. As a consequence,
As part of the going concern assessment, Review on pages 45 to 49. the Directors have chosen a three-year
the Board has also considered a downside The assessment has been based on the time horizon for the Longer-Term Viability
scenario that reflects the current uncertainty The Directors have prepared plans and forecasts Company’s strategy and implementation Statement (LTVS) as being an appropriate
in the global economy and which we consider for a period of at least twelve months from programme, balance sheet and financing time frame for assessing the viability of the
to be severe but plausible. The results of this the date of signing these financial statements. position, and the potential impact of the key Company, as this is the period reviewed by
scenario show that there is sufficient liquidity Based on these, and taking into consideration risks and uncertainties described above. The the Group Board in its strategic planning
in the business for a period of at least 12 the risks detailed in note 19, the Directors have a Company strategy has been translated into a process. The Directors believe that this
months from the date of approval of these reasonable expectation that the Company has three-year strategic plan comprising a one-year presents a reasonable degree of confidence
financial statements, and do not indicate any adequate resources to continue in operational detailed budget and a financial forecast for the over this longer-term outlook, However, the
covenant breach during the test period. The existence for the foreseeable future, and following two years. The plan will be subject to Directors have also given due consideration to
scenario includes assumption for similar extent accordingly have adopted the going concern annual updates by management and review any potential risks beyond this time horizon.
of disruptions as seen in 2020. Set against basis in preparing the consolidated financial by the Board. As a consequence, the Directors
this were mitigating actions including tight statements. This disclosure has been prepared have chosen a three-year time horizon for the This assessment was informed by our
management of capital expenditure, sales and in accordance with the Financial Reporting Long-Term Viability Statement (LTVS) as being judgements as to the potential financial
general overhead, and working capital. Since Council’s UK Corporate Governance Code. an appropriate time frame for assessing the impact of the following Principal Risks if they
the first COVID-19 external announcement viability of the Company. However, the Directors materialise over the three-year period:
issued by the Company, the Group has been Post balance sheet event have also given due consideration to any
cash generative and hence the liquidity position In January 2021, the Company entered into potential risks beyond this time horizon. • Failure to Achieve Acceptable Returns from
has further improved. Overall liquidity (defined a restated and amended Revolving Credit the Packaging Division
as available undrawn borrowing facility plus Facility with certain banks which extended Long term viability statement • Cyber Attack, including an impact on
cash and cash equivalent excluding the amount the arrangements of the existing facility. In accordance with provision 31 of the 2018 UK operational disruption
attributable to non-controlling interests) at the Corporate Governance Code, the Directors • Macro-economic and Trade Deal
end of December was approximately £285m, In February 2021, HMRC confirmed that the have assessed the longer-term viability of Uncertainty (including Brexit)
which improved from approximately £260m Company and its subsidiary, Essentra Filter the Company over the three year period to
Products International Limited, were not • Delivery of Strategic Projects.
at half-year, achieved by diligent cash flow December 2023.
management in the Company. beneficiaries of EU State Aid and therefore
In order to support the assessment of the
there were no funds due to HMRC for recovery
viability, the Directors have considered the
of State Aid.
following realistic and plausible scenarios.
The Directors have assumed that the
risks in each scenario would all crystallise
simultaneously. In Scenario 4, the Directors
have considered the worst case events from
each of the selected Principal Risk.
148 OTHER STATUTORY INFORMATION CONTINUED ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Scenario 4
Level of severity tested
Failure to Achieve Acceptable Returns Revenue reduction of £15.8m, £26.2m and £34.6m, respectively, and decline of the operating
from the Packaging Division (severe) profit of £7.9m, £14.2m and £18.0m, respectively, for the three year period
Cyber event with Business Revenue reduction of £3.3m and decline in the operating profit of £2.2m with one-off
Continuity Impact (severe) exceptional cash cost of £10m in 2021
Macro-economic and Trade deal Revenue reduction of £44.8m, £69.8m and £85.5m, respectively, and decline of the operating
uncertainty (including Brexit) (severe) profit of £15.7m, £23.5m and £28.6m, respectively, for the three year period
Delivery of Strategic Projects Decline in revenue of £0m, £15.0m and £22.5m in 2021, 2022 and 2023, respectively, and decline of
(severe) the operating profit of £1.4m, £7.0m and £7.3m, respectively, for the three year period
149 STATEMENT OF DIRECTORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES IN RESPECT OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
STATEMENT OF DIRECTORS’
RESPONSIBILITIES IN RESPECT
OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The directors are responsible for preparing • select suitable accounting policies and financial position of the group and company • the Directors’ Report includes a fair review
the Annual Report and the financial then apply them consistently; and enable them to ensure that the financial of the development and performance of the
statements in accordance with applicable • state whether applicable International statements and the Directors’ Remuneration business and the position of the group and
law and regulation. accounting standards in conformity with Report comply with the Companies Act 2006. company, together with a description of the
the requirements of the Companies Act principal risks and uncertainties that it faces.
Company law requires the directors to 2006 and international financial reporting The directors are responsible for the
prepare financial statements for each standards adopted pursuant to Regulation maintenance and integrity of the company’s In the case of each director in office at the
financial year. Under that law the directors (EC) No 1606/2002 as it applies in the website. Legislation in the United Kingdom date the directors’ report is approved:
have prepared the group financial European Union have been followed governing the preparation and dissemination
statements in accordance with international of financial statements may differ from • so far as the director is aware, there is
for the group financial statements and
accounting standards in conformity with legislation in other jurisdictions. no relevant audit information of which
United Kingdom Accounting Standards,
the requirements of the Companies Act the group’s and company’s auditors are
comprising FRS 101 have been followed for
2006 and company financial statements in the company financial statements, subject
Directors’ confirmations unaware; and
accordance with United Kingdom Generally to any material departures disclosed and Each of the directors, whose names and • they have taken all the steps that they
Accepted Accounting Practice (United explained in the financial statements; functions are listed in Directors’ Report ought to have taken as a director in order
Kingdom Accounting Standards, comprising confirm that, to the best of their knowledge: to make themselves aware of any relevant
• make judgements and accounting
FRS 101 “Reduced Disclosure Framework”, and audit information and to establish that the
estimates that are reasonable and
applicable law). Additionally, the Financial • the group financial statements, which group’s and company’s auditors are aware
prudent; and
Conduct Authority’s Disclosure Guidance have been prepared in accordance with of that information.
and Transparency Rules require the directors • prepare the financial statements on International accounting standards in
to prepare the group financial statements the going concern basis unless it is conformity with the requirements of the
in accordance with international financial inappropriate to presume that the group Companies Act 2006 and international
reporting standards adopted pursuant to and company will continue in business. financial reporting standards adopted Paul Forman
Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 as it applies pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 Chief Executive
in the European Union. The directors are also responsible for as it applies in the European Union, give a
safeguarding the assets of the group and true and fair view of the assets, liabilities,
Under company law, directors must not company and hence for taking reasonable financial position and profit of the group;
approve the financial statements unless they steps for the prevention and detection of Lily Liu
fraud and other irregularities. • the company financial statements, which
are satisfied that they give a true and fair Chief Financial Officer
have been prepared in accordance with
view of the state of affairs of the group and 5 March 2021
The directors are responsible for keeping United Kingdom Accounting Standards,
company and of the profit or loss of the group
adequate accounting records that are comprising FRS 101, give a true and fair view
for that period. In preparing the financial
sufficient to show and explain the group’s of the assets, liabilities, financial position
statements, the directors are required to:
and company’s transactions and disclose and profit of the company; and
with reasonable accuracy at any time the
150 INDEPENDENT ASSURANCE STATEMENT TO ESSENTRA PLC ESSENTRA PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2020 STRATEGIC REPORT | DIRECTORS’ REPORT
INDEPENDENT ASSURANCE
STATEMENT TO ESSENTRA PLC
ERM Certification and Verification Services (ERM CVS) was engaged by Essentra plc (‘Essentra’) A team of assurance professionals undertook Essentra collects refrigerant gas usage data
to provide limited assurance in relation to the information set out below and presented in the following activities: from its sites, however due to the lack of
Essentra’s 2020 Annual Report (‘the Annual Report’). detailed information regarding the specific
• Interviews with relevant Essentra staff gases used emissions from this source have
Engagement summary to understand and evaluate the data not been included in Essentra’s Scope 1 GHG
Scope of our Whether the 2020 data and explanatory notes for the following indicators presented on pages management systems and processes emissions for 2020.
assurance 40 and 41 of the Annual Report are fairly presented, in all material respects, in accordance
engagement with the reporting criteria:
(including IT systems and internal review
processes) used for collecting and reporting The limitations of our engagement
• Total Scope 1 GHG emissions [metric tonnes of CO2eq]
the selected data; The reliability of the assured data is subject
• Total Scope 2 GHG emissions [metric tonnes of CO2eq]
• Total hazardous and total non-hazardous waste by destination (Landfill, • A review of the internal indicator definitions to inherent uncertainties, given the available
Incineration without energy recovery, Recovery including incineration with energy and conversion factors; methods for determining, calculating or
recovery, and Recycling) [metric tonnes] • Virtual visits to four Essentra sites (UK (2), estimating the underlying information. It
• Zero waste to landfill sites [number] is important to understand our assurance
Turkey and the United States) to review
• Total water usage [cubic meters] conclusions in this context. Due to travel
local data management and reporting
Reporting The WBCSD/WRI GHG Protocol (2004, as revised January 2015) for the Scope 1 and Scope 2
processes, and the consistency of reported restrictions as a result of COVID-19 our
criteria GHG emissions, and Essentra’s internal methodology and reporting criteria for the waste and
water data as described in the footnotes on page 41 of the Annual Report. data with underlying source data and assurance work for the 2020 reporting
related information for each indicator; period was either desk-based or used virtual
Assurance ERM CVS’s assurance methodology, based on the International Standard on Assurance
standard Engagements ISAE 3000 (Revised). interviews and meetings with the Essentra
• An analytical review of the data from all
corporate reporting team and the sites
Assurance level Limited assurance. sites and a check on the completeness
selected for virtual visits. We did not undertake
Respective Essentra is responsible for preparing the data and for its correct presentation in reporting to and accuracy of the corporate data
responsibilities third parties, including disclosure of the reporting criteria and boundary. any in-person visits to Essentra operations.
consolidation;
ERM CVS’s responsibility is to provide conclusions on the agreed scope based on the assurance
activities performed and exercising our professional judgement. • A review of the information relevant to the
scope of our work in the Annual Report, to
ensure consistency with our findings. Beth Wyke
Our conclusions
Partner, Head of Corporate Assurance
Based on our activities, nothing has come to our attention to indicate that the 2020 data and Observations 24 February 2021
explanatory notes for the indicators listed under ‘Scope’ above and shown on pages 40 and 41
Essentra’s location-based Scope 2 GHG
of the Annual Report, are not fairly presented, in all material respects, with the reporting criteria. ERM Certification and
emissions for 2020 have been calculated by
applying IEA (2019) emission factors to the Verification Services,
Our assurance activities London
underlying activity data. The Scope 2 GHG
Our objective was to assess whether the selected data are reported in accordance with the emissions for 2020 calculated using these www.ermcvs.com;
principles of completeness, comparability (across the organisation) and accuracy (including emissions factors are higher than would be email: post@ermcvs.com
calculations, use of appropriate conversion factors and consolidation). We planned and the case if IEA (2020) emission factors had
performed our work to obtain all the information and explanations that we believe were been applied.
necessary to provide a basis for our assurance conclusions.
ERM CVS is a member of the ERM Group. The work that ERM CVS conducts for clients is solely related to independent assurance activities and auditor training. Our processes are designed and implemented to ensure that the work we undertake with clients is free from bias and
conflict of interest. ERM CVS and the ERM staff that have undertaken this engagement work have provided no consultancy related services to Essentra in any respect.
Essentra plc
essentraplc.com
Avebury House
201-249 Avebury Boulevard
Milton Keynes
MK9 1AU
United Kingdom