On the possible mathematical connections between some “solutions of the Born–

Infeld constraints corresponding to the cubic Curves”, some Ramanujan

formulas, the κ formula regarding the Riemann Zeta Function and some
expressions concerning the Supersymmetry Breaking

Michele Nardelli1, Antonio Nardelli2

Abstract

In this research thesis, we describe the possible mathematical connections between

some “solutions of the Born–Infeld constraints corresponding to the cubic Curves”,
some Ramanujan formulas, the κ formula regarding the Riemann Zeta Function and
some expressions concerning the Supersymmetry Breaking

1
M.Nardelli studied at Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II,
Largo S. Marcellino, 10 - 80138 Napoli, Dipartimento di Matematica ed Applicazioni “R. Caccioppoli” -
Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II” – Polo delle Scienze e delle Tecnologie Monte S. Angelo, Via
Cintia (Fuorigrotta), 80126 Napoli, Italy
2
A. Nardelli studies at the Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II - Dipartimento di Studi Umanistici –
Sezione Filosofia - scholar of Theoretical Philosophy
1
 Antonio Grablovitz

My Doctoral Advisor – Mathematician and Physicist

Assistant Professor of Renato Caccioppoli

Vesuvius landscape with gorse – Naples

https://www.pinterest.it/pin/95068242114589901/

2
We want to highlight that the development of the various equations was carried
out according an our possible logical and original interpretation

From:

Complex Analysis in Number Theory – 22.11.1994 - Anatoly A. Karatsuba

We have that:

3
4
From:

On the Zeros of the Davenport Heilbronn Function

S. A. Gritsenko - Received May 15, 2016 - ISSN 0081-5438, Proceedings of the
Steklov Institute of Mathematics, 2017, Vol. 296, pp. 65–87.

We have:

( 10 − 2 5 − 2) ( 5 − 1) = 𝜅

5
Input:

Decimal approximation:

0.28407904384…. = κ

Alternate forms:

Minimal polynomial:

Expanded forms:

6
For ((((√(10-2√5) -2))⁄((√5-1)))) = 8πG; G = 0.011303146014

Indeed:

((((√(10-2√5) -2))⁄((√5-1))))/(8π)

Input:

Result:

Decimal approximation:

0.01130314…. = g (gravitational coupling constant)

Property:

7
Alternate forms:

Expanded forms:

Series representations:

8
We note that:

(((√(10-2√5) -2))⁄((√5-1)))*((2 i (sqrt(5) - 1) t + sqrt(5) - 1)/(2 (sqrt(2 (5 - sqrt(5))) -

2)))

Input:

Exact result:

9
Plot:

Alternate form assuming t>0:

Alternate forms:

10
1/2+it = real part of every nontrivial zero of the Riemann zeta function

Derivative:

Indefinite integral:

And again:

(((√(10-2√5) -2))⁄((2x)))*((2 i (sqrt(5) - 1) t + sqrt(5) - 1)/(2 (sqrt(2 (5 - sqrt(5))) - 2)))

= (1/2+it)

Input:

11
Exact result:

Alternate form assuming t and x are real:

Alternate form:

Alternate form assuming t and x are positive:

Expanded forms:

12
Solutions:

Input:

Decimal approximation:

1
0.6180339887…. =
𝜙

Solution for the variable x:

Implicit derivatives:

13
Generalized Born–Infeld actions and projective cubic Curves - S. Ferrara, M.
Porrati, A. Sagnotti, R. Stora, and A. Yeranyan - Received 22 December 2014,
accepted 22 December 2014 - Published online 4 February 2015

We have that:

Ai = 3+1+1+2(1+1) = 9 , Ak = -9

From (A.17):

-7(9^3+(-9^3))+38*9^3+3[9(9^2+(-9)^2)-8*(-9)*9]*9+9(9-9)(9*(-9)-4*9^2)

14
Input:

Result:

84564 = α

9^2-9^2+10*9^2+8(-9)(9)-10(9-9)*9

Input:

Result:

162 = β

[-7(9^3+(-9^3))+38*9^3+3[9(9^2+(-9)^2)-8*(-9)*9]*9+9(9-9)(9*(-9)-4*9^2)] / [9^2-
9^2+10*9^2+8(-9)(9)-10(9-9)*9]

Input:

Result:

522

[-7(9^3+(-9^3))+38*9^3+3[9(9^2+(-9)^2)-8*(-9)*9]*9+9(9-9)(9*(-9)-4*9^2)] / [9^2-
9^2+10*9^2+8(-9)(9)-10(9-9)*9] – 26

15
Input:

Result:

496 result very near to the 495.672 that is the fundamental frequency of the Table of
Frequency System based on Phi, connected with the aurea ratio 1.618034

From:

B = -(2+3)^3 = -125 A = -25^3+(-125)^2 = 0

D = (2+3)^2 = 25 C = 9 + 4 – 3 + 12 = 22

1/3*sqrt[(22+2(e^((2Pi)/3) (-125)^(1/3)]

Input:

16
Exact result:

Decimal approximation:

Property:

Polar coordinates:

Polar forms:

17
Approximate form

Polar coordinates:

3.2344

Alternate forms:

18
Series representations:

From the previous expression

we obtain:

(((([-7(9^3+(-9^3))+38*9^3+3[9(9^2+(-9)^2)-8*(-9)*9]*9+9(9-9)(9*(-9)-4*9^2)] /
[9^2-9^2+10*9^2+8(-9)(9)-10(9-9)*9])))) / ((((1/3*sqrt[(22+2(e^((2Pi)/3)) (-
125)^(1/3))]))))

19
Input:

Exact result:

Decimal approximation:

Property:

Polar coordinates:

161.39

Polar forms:

20
Approximate form

Alternate forms:

Series representations:

21
(((([-7(9^3+(-9^3))+38*9^3+3[9(9^2+(-9)^2)-8*(-9)*9]*9+9(9-9)(9*(-9)-4*9^2)] /
[9^2-9^2+10*9^2+8(-9)(9)-10(9-9)*9])))) * ((((1/3*sqrt[(22+2(e^((2Pi)/3)) (-
125)^(1/3))]))))+47-Pi

Input:

Exact result:

Decimal approximation:

22
Result:

Polar coordinates:

1728.475….. This result is very near to the mass of candidate glueball f0(1710)
scalar meson. Furthermore, 1728 occurs in the algebraic formula for the j-invariant
of an elliptic curve. The number 1728 is one less than the Hardy–Ramanujan number
1729 (taxicab number)

Polar forms:

Possible closed forms:

23
Polar forms:

Approximate form

Alternate forms:

24
Series representations:

25
(147.24947 - 66.06099i) 1/(((((1566*(1/sqrt(22 + 10 (-1)^(1/3) e^((2
π)/3)))*1/1566)))))+(147.24947 - 66.06099i)+(12+golden ratio^2)

i.e.

(147.24947 - 66.06099i) 1/((((((1/sqrt(22 + 10 (-1)^(1/3) e^((2

π)/3))))))))+(147.24947 - 66.06099i)+(12+golden ratio^2)

Input interpretation:

Result:

Polar coordinates:

1729.13 This result is very near to the mass of candidate glueball f0(1710) scalar
meson. Furthermore, 1728 occurs in the algebraic formula for the j-invariant of an
elliptic curve. The number 1728 is one less than the Hardy–Ramanujan number 1729
(taxicab number)

26
Polar forms:

Series representations:

27
(((147.24947 - 66.06099i) 1/((((((1/sqrt(22 + 10 (-1)^(1/3) e^((2
π)/3))))))))+(147.24947 - 66.06099i)+(12+golden ratio^2)))^1/15

Input interpretation:

Result:

Polar coordinates:

𝜋2
1.64382 ≈ ζ(2) = = 1.644934 …
6

Polar forms:

28
(161.38916) 1/((((((1/sqrt(22 + 10 e^((2 π)/3))))))))-2/(161.38916)+89+1/golden ratio

Input interpretation:

Result:

1729.1581…. This result is very near to the mass of candidate glueball f0(1710)
scalar meson. Furthermore, 1728 occurs in the algebraic formula for the j-invariant
of an elliptic curve. The number 1728 is one less than the Hardy–Ramanujan number
1729 (taxicab number)

Series representations:

29
(((161.38916) 1/((((((1/sqrt(22 + 10 e^((2 π)/3))))))))-2/(161.38916)+89+1/golden
ratio))^1/15

Input interpretation:

Result:

𝜋2
1.6438252466….≈ ζ(2) = = 1.644934 …
6

We have that:

30
For σ = -3/2 ; 1+(2*-3/2) = -2 = Aii

x(2^2-4*2*2*9/4) + 4x*9/4(2*2+2*2^2*(-3/2)) – 2*2*2*x(1+8*(-27/8)) +

4*x*9/4(2*2+2*2^2*(-3/2))+2^2-4*2*2*9/4

Input:

Result:

Plot:

Geometric figure:

31
Alternate form:

Root:

x=U=1

Properties as a real function:

Domain

Range

Bijectivity

Derivative:

Indefinite integral:

32
For σ = -3/2 ; 1+(2*-3/2) = -2 = Aii

Sqrt((((4/(-2+2*(-3/2)*(-2*-3/2+sqrt(4-2*4*(-3/2)+4*9/4))))

Input:

Result:

Decimal approximation:

0.39223227…i

Polar coordinates:

33
Polar forms:

Approximate form

From

(((1/3*sqrt[(22+2(e^((2Pi)/3))) (-125)^(1/3)]))) + (((Sqrt((((4/(-2+2*(-3/2)*(-2*-

3/2+sqrt(4-2*4*(-3/2)+4*9/4))))))))))

Input:

Exact result:

34
Decimal approximation:

Property:

Polar coordinates:

Polar coordinates:

4.8173

Polar forms:

35
Approximate form

Alternate forms:

36
Series representations:

37
1/3[(((1/3*sqrt[(22+2(e^((2Pi)/3))) (-125)^(1/3)]))) + (((Sqrt((((4/(-2+2*(-3/2)*(-2*-
3/2+sqrt(4-2*4*(-3/2)+4*9/4))))))))))]

Input:

Exact result:

Decimal approximation:

38
Property:

Polar coordinates:

1.6058 result that is a very good approximation to the value of the golden ratio
1.618033988749...

Polar forms:

Approximate forms

Approximate form

39
Alternate forms:

Expanded forms:

40
Series representations:

41
1/(2+0.9568666)[(((1/3*sqrt[(22+2(e^((2Pi)/3))) (-125)^(1/3)]))) + (((Sqrt((((4/(-
2+2*(-3/2)*(-2*-3/2+sqrt(4-2*4*(-3/2)+4*9/4))))))))))]

Input interpretation:

Result:

42
Polar coordinates:

𝜋2
1.6292 result very near to the mean between ζ(2) = = 1.644934 … and the value
6
of golden ratio 1.61803398…, i.e. 1.63148399

Polar forms:

Series representations:

43
1/2[1/9(-1)^(1/6) sqrt(10(11+e^((2 π)/3)))+1/3 i sqrt(2/13)+((((1/3 sqrt((22 + 2 e^((2
π)/3)) (-125)^(1/3)) + sqrt(4/(-2 + 2/2 (-3) (-(2 (-3))/2 + sqrt(4 +(3 2 4)/2 + (4
9)/4)))))/(2 + 0.956867))))]

44
Input interpretation:

Result:

Polar coordinates:

1.61749 result that is a very good approximation to the value of the golden ratio
1.618033988749...

Polar forms:

45
Series representations:

46
47
48
From:

162 = β; 84564 = α; Ai = 3+1+1+2(1+1) = 9; Ak = -9

1/(6sqrt(3))* sqrt[(84564-162*(((8(81-81-81)-5(81+81+(-9)^2)))^0.5)/(((81+81+81-
81-9(-9)-9(-9)))]

Input:

Exact result:

Decimal approximation:

Polar coordinates:

49
Polar coordinates:

1.5572

Polar forms:

Approximate form

Alternate forms:

Minimal polynomial:

50
1+1/(((1/(6sqrt(3))* sqrt[(84564-162*(((8(81-81-81)-5(81+81+(-
9)^2)))^0.5))/(((81+81+81-81-9(-9)-9(-9))))])))

Input:

Exact result:

Decimal approximation:

Input interpretation:

Result:

Polar coordinates:

𝜋2
1.64183999691…..≈ ζ(2) = = 1.644934 …
6

51
Polar forms:

Possible closed forms:

52
Polar forms:

Approximate form

Alternate forms:

53
Minimal polynomial:

From the three previous expressions, we obtain:

1/3*sqrt[(22+2(e^((2Pi)/3))) (-125)^(1/3)] + Sqrt((((4/(-2+2*(-3/2)*(-2*-3/2+sqrt(4-

2*4*(-3/2)+4*9/4)))))))

Input:

Exact result:

Decimal approximation:

Property:

Polar coordinates:

4.8173

54
Polar forms:

Approximate form

Alternate forms:

55
Series representations:

56
(((1/3 (-1)^(1/6) sqrt(5 (22 + 2 e^((2 π)/3))) + i sqrt(2/13))))+(((1/(6sqrt(3))*
sqrt[(84564-162*(((8(81-81-81)-5(81+81+(-9)^2))))^0.5)/(((81+81+81-81-9(-9)-9(-
9))))])))

Input:

Exact result:

Decimal approximation:

57
Polar coordinates:

6.14057347….

Property:

Polar forms:

58
 Approximate form

Alternate forms:

59
Series representations:

60
61
From which:

62
1+1/(((i sqrt(2/13) + 1/108 sqrt(1/3 (84564 - 1458 i sqrt(23))) + 1/3 (-1)^(1/6) sqrt(5
(22 + 2 e^((2 π)/3))))))^1/4

Input:

Decimal approximation:

Result:

Polar coordinates:

𝜋2
1.6328718949240156 result very near to the mean between ζ(2) = = 1.644934 …
6
and the value of golden ratio 1.61803398…, i.e. 1.63148399

Property:

From the three results, we have also:

sqrt(((2(((1/3*sqrt[(22+2(e^((2Pi)/3))) (-125)^(1/3)]))) (((√(10-2√5) -2))⁄((√5-1))))))

63
where (((√(10-2√5) -2))⁄((√5-1))) = κ

Input:

Exact result:

Decimal approximation:

Property:

Polar coordinates:

1.6183 result that is a very good approximation to the value of the golden ratio
1.618033988749...

Polar forms:

64
 Approximate form

Alternate forms:

65
All 2nd roots of (2 (-1)^(1/6) (sqrt(10 - 2 sqrt(5)) - 2) sqrt(5 (22 + 2 e^((2
π)/3))))/(3 (sqrt(5) - 1)):

Series representations:

66
sqrt((([Sqrt((((4/(-2+2*(-3/2)*(-2*-3/2+sqrt(4-2*4*(-3/2)+4*9/4)))))))
(1+0.9568666373)/(((√(10-2√5) -2))⁄((√5-1)))])))

Input interpretation:

Result:

67
Polar coordinates:

𝜋2
1.64374 ≈ ζ(2) = = 1.644934 …
6

(1+0.9991104684)(((((1/(6sqrt(3))* sqrt[(84564-162*(((8(81-81-81)-5(81+81+(-
9)^2))))^0.5)/(((81+81+81-81-9(-9)-9(-9))))])))*(((√(10-2√5) -2))⁄((√5-1)))^1/2))

Input interpretation:

Result:

Polar coordinates:
Radians

1.65922 result that is very near to the 14th root of the following Ramanujan’s class
3
invariant 𝑄 = 𝐺505 /𝐺101/5 = 1164.2696 i.e. 1.65578...

Indeed, from:

68
 3
14
113+5 505 105+5 505
+ = 1,65578 …
8 8

69
Observations

We note that, from the number 8, we obtain as follows:

We notice how from the numbers 8 and 2 we get 64, 1024, 4096 and 8192, and that 8
is the fundamental number. In fact 82 = 64, 83 = 512, 84 = 4096. We define it
"fundamental number", since 8 is a Fibonacci number, which by rule, divided by the
previous one, which is 5, gives 1.6 , a value that tends to the golden ratio, as for all
numbers in the Fibonacci sequence

70
“Golden” Range

Finally we note how 82 = 64, multiplied by 27, to which we add 1, is equal to 1729,
the so-called "Hardy-Ramanujan number". Then taking the 15th root of 1729, we
obtain a value close to ζ(2) that 1.6438 ..., which, in turn, is included in the range of
what we call "golden numbers"

Furthermore for all the results very near to 1728 or 1729, adding 64 = 82, one obtain
values about equal to 1792 or 1793. These are values almost equal to the Planck
multipole spectrum frequency 1792.35 and to the hypothetical Gluino mass

71
Mathematical connections with some sectors of String Theory

From:

Modular equations and approximations to 𝝅 - Srinivasa Ramanujan

Quarterly Journal of Mathematics, XLV, 1914, 350 – 372

We have that:

72
From:

An Update on Brane Supersymmetry Breaking

J. Mourad and A. Sagnotti - arXiv:1711.11494v1 [hep-th] 30 Nov 2017

From the following vacuum equations:

we have obtained, from the results almost equals of the equations, putting

instead of

a new possible mathematical connection between the two exponentials. Thence, also
the values concerning p, C, βE and 𝜙 correspond to the exponents of e (i.e. of exp).
Thence we obtain for p = 5 and βE = 1/2:

𝑒 −6𝐶+𝜙 = 4096𝑒 −𝜋 18

Therefore, with respect to the exponentials of the vacuum equations, the Ramanujan’s
exponential has a coefficient of 4096 which is equal to 642, while -6C+𝜙 is equal to -
𝜋 18. From this it follows that it is possible to establish mathematically, the dilaton
value.

73
For

exp((-Pi*sqrt(18)) we obtain:

Input:

Exact result:

Decimal approximation:

1.6272016… * 10-6

Property:

Series representations:

Now, we have the following calculations:

74
 𝑒 −6𝐶+𝜙 = 4096𝑒 −𝜋 18

𝑒 −𝜋 18
= 1.6272016… * 10^-6

from which:
1
𝑒 −6𝐶+𝜙 = 1.6272016… * 10^-6
4096

0.000244140625 𝑒 −6𝐶+𝜙 = 𝑒 −𝜋 18
= 1.6272016… * 10^-6

Now:
ln 𝑒 −𝜋 18
= −13.328648814475 = −𝜋 18

And:

(1.6272016* 10^-6) *1/ (0.000244140625)

Input interpretation:

Result:

0.006665017...

Thence:

75
 0.000244140625 𝑒 −6𝐶+𝜙 = 𝑒 −𝜋 18

Dividing both sides by 0.000244140625, we obtain:

0.000244140625 1
𝑒 −6𝐶+𝜙 = 𝑒 −𝜋 18
0.000244140625 0.000244140625

𝑒 −6𝐶+𝜙 = 0.0066650177536

((((exp((-Pi*sqrt(18)))))))*1/0.000244140625

Input interpretation:

Result:

0.00666501785…

Series representations:

76
Now:

𝑒 −6𝐶+𝜙 = 0.0066650177536

= 0.00666501785…

From:

ln(0.00666501784619)

Input interpretation:

Result:

-5.010882647757…

Alternative representations:

77
Series representations:

Integral representation:

In conclusion:

−6𝐶 + 𝜙 = −5.010882647757 …

and for C = 1, we obtain:

𝜙 = −5.010882647757 + 6 = 𝟎. 𝟗𝟖𝟗𝟏𝟏𝟕𝟑𝟓𝟐𝟐𝟒𝟑 = 𝝓

Note that the values of ns (spectral index) 0.965, of the average of the Omega mesons
Regge slope 0.987428571 and of the dilaton 0.989117352243, are also connected to
the following two Rogers-Ramanujan continued fractions:

78
(http://www.bitman.name/math/article/102/109/)

The mean between the two results of the above Rogers-Ramanujan continued
fractions is 0.97798855285, value very near to the ψ Regge slope 0.979:

Also performing the 512th root of the inverse value of the Pion meson rest mass
139.57, we obtain:

((1/(139.57)))^1/512

Input interpretation:

79
Result:

0.99040073.... result very near to the dilaton value 𝟎. 𝟗𝟖𝟗𝟏𝟏𝟕𝟑𝟓𝟐𝟐𝟒𝟑 = 𝝓 and to

the value of the following Rogers-Ramanujan continued fraction:

From

AdS Vacua from Dilaton Tadpoles and Form Fluxes - J. Mourad and A. Sagnotti
- arXiv:1612.08566v2 [hep-th] 22 Feb 2017 - March 27, 2018

We have:

For

ξ=1

80
we obtain:

(2*e^(0.989117352243/2)) / (1+sqrt(((1-1/3*16/(Pi)^2*e^(2*0.989117352243)))))

Input interpretation:

Result:

Polar coordinates:

1.65919106525….. result very near to the 14th root of the following Ramanujan’s
3
class invariant 𝑄 = 𝐺505 /𝐺101/5 = 1164.2696 i.e. 1.65578...

Series representations:

81
From

We obtain:

e^(4*0.989117352243) / (((1+sqrt(1-1/3*16/(Pi)^2*e^(2*0.989117352243)))))^7
[42(1+sqrt(1-
1/3*16/(Pi)^2*e^(2*0.989117352243)))+5*16/(Pi)^2*e^(2*0.989117352243)]

Input interpretation:

Result:

Polar coordinates:

54.76072411…..

82
Series representations:

83
From which:

e^(4*0.989117352243) / (((1+sqrt(1-1/3*16/(Pi)^2*e^(2*0.989117352243)))))^7
[42(1+sqrt(1-
1/3*16/(Pi)^2*e^(2*0.989117352243)))+5*16/(Pi)^2*e^(2*0.989117352243)]*1/34

Input interpretation:

Result:

Polar coordinates:

1.610609533…. result that is a good approximation to the value of the golden ratio
1.618033988749...

84
Series representations:

85
Now, we have:

For:

ξ=1

𝜙 = 0.989117352243

86
From

we obtain:

((2*e^(-0.989117352243/2))) /
((((1+sqrt(((1+1/3*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))))))))

Input interpretation:

Result:

0.382082347529….

Series representations:

87
From which:

1+1/(((4((2*e^(-0.989117352243/2))) /
((((1+sqrt(((1+1/3*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243)))))))))))

Input interpretation:

Result:

1.6543092….. We note that, the result 1.6543092... is very near to the 14th root of the
3
following Ramanujan’s class invariant 𝑄 = 𝐺505 /𝐺101/5 = 1164.2696 i.e.
1.65578...

Indeed:

88
 3
14
113+5 505 105+5 505
+ = 1,65578 …
8 8

Series representations:

89
And from

we obtain:

e^(-4*0.989117352243) / [1+sqrt(((1+1/3*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243)))]^7 *
[42(1+sqrt(((1+1/3*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243)))-
13*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243)]

Input interpretation:

90
Result:

-0.034547055658…

Series representations:

91
From which:

47 *1/(((-1/(((((e^(-4*0.989117352243) /
[1+sqrt(((1+1/3*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))))]^7 *
[42(1+sqrt(((1+1/3*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))))-
13*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))]))))))))
92
Input interpretation:

Result:

1.6237116159…. result that is an approximation to the value of the golden ratio

1.618033988749...

Series representations:

93
94
And again:

32((((e^(-4*0.989117352243) /
[1+sqrt(((1+1/3*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))))]^7 *
[42(1+sqrt(((1+1/3*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))))-
13*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))]))))

Input interpretation:

Result:

-1.1055057810….

We note that the result -1.1055057810…. is very near to the value of Cosmological
Constant, less 10-52 , thence 1.1056, with minus sign

95
Series representations:

96
97
And:

-[32((((e^(-4*0.989117352243) /
[1+sqrt(((1+1/3*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))))]^7 *
[42(1+sqrt(((1+1/3*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))))-
13*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))]))))]^5

Input interpretation:

Result:

1.651220569…. result very near to the 14th root of the following Ramanujan’s class
3
invariant 𝑄 = 𝐺505 /𝐺101/5 = 1164.2696 i.e. 1.65578...

98
Series representations:

99
100
We obtain also:

-[32((((e^(-4*0.989117352243) /
[1+sqrt(((1+1/3*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))))]^7 *
[42(1+sqrt(((1+1/3*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))))-
13*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))]))))]^1/2

Input interpretation:

Result:

Polar coordinates:

1.05143035007

101
Series representations:

102
1 / -[32((((e^(-4*0.989117352243) /
[1+sqrt(((1+1/3*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))))]^7 *
[42(1+sqrt(((1+1/3*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))))-
13*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))]))))]^1/2

Input interpretation:

103
Result:

Polar coordinates:

0.95108534763

We know that the primordial fluctuations are consistent with Gaussian purely
adiabatic scalar perturbations characterized by a power spectrum with a spectral
index ns = 0.965 ± 0.004, consistent with the predictions of slow-roll, single-field,
inflation.

Thence 0.95108534763 is a result very near to the spectral index ns , to the mesonic
Regge slope, to the inflaton value at the end of the inflation 0.9402 and to the value
of the following Rogers-Ramanujan continued fraction:

104
Series representations:

105
106
From the previous expression

= -0.034547055658…

we have also:

107
1+1/(((4((2*e^(-0.989117352243/2))) /
((((1+sqrt(((1+1/3*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))))))))))) + (-0.034547055658)

Input interpretation:

Result:

1.61976215705….. result that is a very good approximation to the value of the golden
ratio 1.618033988749...

Series representations:

108
Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Professor Augusto Sagnotti theoretical physicist at Scuola

Normale Superiore (Pisa – Italy) for his very useful explanations and his availability

109
References

Complex Analysis in Number Theory – 22.11.1994 - Anatoly A. Karatsuba

On the Zeros of the Davenport Heilbronn Function

S. A. Gritsenko - Received May 15, 2016 - ISSN 0081-5438, Proceedings of the
Steklov Institute of Mathematics, 2017, Vol. 296, pp. 65–87.

Generalized Born–Infeld actions and projective cubic Curves - S. Ferrara, M.

Porrati, A. Sagnotti, R. Stora, and A. Yeranyan - Received 22 December 2014,
accepted 22 December 2014 - Published online 4 February 2015

Modular equations and approximations to 𝝅 - Srinivasa Ramanujan

Quarterly Journal of Mathematics, XLV, 1914, 350 – 372

An Update on Brane Supersymmetry Breaking

J. Mourad and A. Sagnotti - arXiv:1711.11494v1 [hep-th] 30 Nov 2017

March 27, 2018

AdS Vacua from Dilaton Tadpoles and Form Fluxes
J. Mourad and A. Sagnotti - arXiv:1612.08566v2 [hep-th] 22 Feb 2017

110