Myla Ruth N.

Sara

AQUINO vs. COMELEC

(248 SCRA 400)

Facts:

On 20 March 1995, Agapito A. Aquino filed his Certificate of Candidacy for the position of Representative
Representative
for the new Second Legislative District of Makati City. In his certificate of candidacy, Aquino stated that he was a
resident
resident of the aforementioned district for 10 months. Faced
Faced with a petition for disqualification, he amended the
entry on his residency in his certificate of candidacy to 1 year and 13 days. The Commission on Elections
dismissed the petition on 6 May and allowed Aquino to run in the election of 8 May. Aquino won. Acting on a
motion for reconsideration of the above dismissal, the Commission on Election later issued an order suspending
the proclamation of Aquino until the Commission resolved the issue. On 2 June, the Commission on Elections
found Aquino ineligible and disqualified for the elective office for lack of constitutional qualification
qualification of residence.
residence.

Issue: Wheth
Whether
er “resid
residenc
ency”
y” in the certif
certifica
icate
te of candid
candidac
acy
y actual
actually
ly connot
connotes
es “domic
“domicile
ile”
” to warran
warrantt the
disqualification
disqualification of Aquino from the position in the electoral district.

Held:

 The place “where a party actually or constructively has his permanent home,” where he, no matter
where he may be found at any given time, eventually intends to return and remain, i.e., his domicile, is that to
which the Constitution refers when it speaks of residence for the purposes of election law. The purpose is to
exclude
exclude strangers
strangers or newcomers
newcomers unfamiliar
unfamiliar with the conditions
conditions and needs of the community from taking
taking
advantag
advantage
e of favorable
favorable circumstan
circumstances
ces existing
existing in that community for electora
electorall gain.
gain. Aquino’s
Aquino’s certific
certificate
ate of 
candidacy in a previous (1992) election indicates that he was a resident and a registered voter of San Jose,
Concepcion, Tarlac for more than 52 years prior to that election. Aquino’s connection to the Second District of 
Makati City is an alleged lease agreement of a condominium unit in the area. The intention not to establish a
permanent home in Makati City is evident in his leasing a condominium unit instead of buying one. The short
length of time he claims to be a resident of Makati (and the fact of his stated domicile in Tarlac
Tarlac and his claims of 
other residences in Metro Manila) indicate that his sole purpose in transferring his physical residence is not to
acquire a new, residence
residence or domicile but only to qualify as a candidate for Representative
Representative of the Second District
of Makati City. Aquino was thus rightfully disqualified by the Commission on Elections.