Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Scholarship Reflection
Scholarship Reflection
Ellie Park
Mrs. Scharf
ERWC
03 May 2021
On my original essay from tenth grade, I scored a 9/8 on my “Abolish the Penny”
piece. Although my score was high, I realized that I added way too much fluff around topics
where I did not have much to say. For instance, in the first body paragraph, I wrote about the
1700’s time frame of pricing and the penny’s significance. Looking back, the documents given,
did not mention hardly any 1700s pricing or cultural mentions. So, in my rewrite, I focused on
the penny in present-day use. I made my points clear but did not force myself to follow the
two-chunk paragraph style that often creates inorganic phrasing and direction. Throughout the
essay, I incorporated more textual evidence from all but one of the documents provided. In the
third body paragraph, I added more of Source F and introduced a portion of Source G within my
argument. I also altered the topic of paragraph 2 slightly. Before, the paragraph had a misused
quote from Source C and therefore had an unrefined point after reading both articles. I changed
the context around the Source C quote and even added more supporting words from the author
that added to the visual of the forgotten and impractical penny. I changed the personal
perspective point to a slight counter-argument and rebuttal point for a more objective, but
respectfully show the audience, currency past their historical background, and more for their role
2
in society. All in all, my “Abolish the Penny” essay from tenth-grade, had solid bones, however