This document is a mid-year review form for a Teacher I-III that includes their name, position, bureau/center, and date of review. It lists the key result areas, objectives, timeline, means of verification, and performance targets for their mid-year review. The objectives focus on applying content knowledge, using technology to facilitate learning, applying various teaching strategies, establishing a learner-centered culture, teaching diverse learners, and providing timely feedback to improve performance. Documentation like lesson plans, materials, and observation notes are used as evidence to rate performance on these objectives.
This document is a mid-year review form for a Teacher I-III that includes their name, position, bureau/center, and date of review. It lists the key result areas, objectives, timeline, means of verification, and performance targets for their mid-year review. The objectives focus on applying content knowledge, using technology to facilitate learning, applying various teaching strategies, establishing a learner-centered culture, teaching diverse learners, and providing timely feedback to improve performance. Documentation like lesson plans, materials, and observation notes are used as evidence to rate performance on these objectives.
This document is a mid-year review form for a Teacher I-III that includes their name, position, bureau/center, and date of review. It lists the key result areas, objectives, timeline, means of verification, and performance targets for their mid-year review. The objectives focus on applying content knowledge, using technology to facilitate learning, applying various teaching strategies, establishing a learner-centered culture, teaching diverse learners, and providing timely feedback to improve performance. Documentation like lesson plans, materials, and observation notes are used as evidence to rate performance on these objectives.
This document is a mid-year review form for a Teacher I-III that includes their name, position, bureau/center, and date of review. It lists the key result areas, objectives, timeline, means of verification, and performance targets for their mid-year review. The objectives focus on applying content knowledge, using technology to facilitate learning, applying various teaching strategies, establishing a learner-centered culture, teaching diverse learners, and providing timely feedback to improve performance. Documentation like lesson plans, materials, and observation notes are used as evidence to rate performance on these objectives.
Position: TEACHER I Position: MASTER TEACHER I Bureau/Center/Service/Division: CITY SCHOOLS DIVISION OF CALAMBA CITY Date of Review: Rating Period:
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight Results MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal/MT) per KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality Education Knowledge knowledge of (COT) rating sheet/inter- Services and content within and observer agreement form Pedagogy across curriculum teaching areas.
Basic 2. Ensured the Any supplementary material Quality
Education positive use of (in print/digital format) made Services ICT to facilitate by the ratee and used in the the teaching and lesson delivery learning process • Activity sheet/s • One lesson from a locally crafted self-learning module (SLM) • Lesson plan (e.g., DLP, DLL, WHLP, WLP, WLL, Lesson Exemplars, and the likes) • Video lesson • Audio lesson • Other learning materials in print/digital format (please specify and provide annotations) Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review Weight MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal/MT) Results per KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Basic 3. Applied a range Any supplementary material Quality Education of teaching (in print/digital format) made Services strategies to by the ratee and used in the develop critical lesson delivery and creative • Activity sheet/s thinking, as well • One lesson from a locally as other higher- crafted self-learning module order thinking (SLM) skills • Lesson plan (e.g., DLP, DLL, WHLP, WLP, WLL, Lesson Exemplars, and the likes) • Video lesson • Audio lesson • Other learning materials in print/digital format (please specify and provide annotations)
Basic 2. Learning 4. Established a 22.5% Any supplementary material Quality
Education Environment learner-centered (in print/digital format) made Services and Diversity culture by using by the ratee and used in the of Learners teaching lesson delivery strategies that • Activity sheet/s respond to their • One lesson from a locally linguistic, cultural, crafted self-learning module socioeconomic (SLM) and religious backgrounds • Lesson plan (e.g., DLP, DLL, WHLP, WLP, WLL, Lesson Exemplars, and the likes) • Video lesson • Audio lesson • Other learning materials in print/digital format (please specify and provide Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review Weight MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal/MT) Results per KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks annotations)
Basic 5. Planned and COT rating sheet/inter-observer Quality
Education delivered teaching agreement form Services strategies that are responsive to the special educational needs of learners in difficult circumstances, including: geographic isolation; chronic illness; displacement due to armed conflict, urban resettlement or disasters; child abuse and child labor practices
Basic 6. Used strategies Evidence that highlights Quality
Education for providing providing accurate and Services timely, accurate constructive feedback to and constructive improve learner feedback to performance and that shows improve learner timeliness of feedback given performance to any of the following Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review Weight MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal/MT) Results per KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks • activity sheet Efficiency • performance task • portfolio • quiz or test • self-learning module
Education and Planning developed, observer agreement form Services organized and used appropriate teaching and learning resources, including ICT, to address learning goals Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review Weight MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal/MT) Results per KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks 8. Set achievable One lesson plan (e.g., DLP, Quality and appropriate DLL, WHLP, WLP, WLL, learning Lesson Exemplars, and the outcomes that are likes) or one lesson from a aligned with self-learning module learning prepared by the ratee with competencies achievable and appropriate learning outcomes that are aligned with the learning competencies as shown in any of the following: • Lecture/discussion • Activity/activity sheet • Performance task • Rubric for assessing performance using criteria that appropriately describe the target output
Basic 9. Built 1. Proof of participation in any Quality
Education relationships with activity for improved access Services parents/ to education such as, but not guardians and the limited to the ff. activities wider school • Distribution of learning community to materials to learners/parents facilitate (e.g., receipt form/monitoring involvement in the form during distribution of educative process learning materials, etc.) • Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review Weight MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal/MT) Results per KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Brigada Eskwela (e.g., Efficiency commitment form to stakeholders, developed advocacy materials, certificate of participation that involves parents’/stakeholders’ engagement signed by the school head, etc.) • Home visitation (e.g., home visitation form, etc.) • Others (please specify and provide annotations) 2. Parent-teacher log or proof of other stakeholders meeting (e.g., one-on-one parent-teacher-learner conference log; attendance sheet with minutes of online or face-to-face meeting; proof of involvement in the learners’/parents’ orientation, etc.)
3. Any form of communication
to parents/stakeholders (e.g., notice of meeting; screenshot of chat/text message/communication with parent/guardian [name or any identifier removed]; digital/ printed copy of Learner Enrollment Survey Form signed by the ICT Coordinator/Focal person and School Head) Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review Weight MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal/MT) Results per KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Basic 4. 10. Participated in 22.5% • Certificate of completion in Quality Education Assessment professional a course/training • Services and networks to share Certificate of participation in Reporting knowledge and to a webinar, retooling, enhance practice upskilling, and other training/ seminar/ workshop with proof of implementation Efficiency • Certificate of recognition/ speakership in a webinar, retooling, upskilling, and other training/ seminar/ workshop • Any proof of participation to a benchmarking activity • Any proof of participation in school LAC sessions (online/face-to-face) certified by the LAC Coordinator • Others (please specify and provide annotations)
Basic 11. Developed a Main MOV Quality
Education personal • Individual Performance Services improvement plan and Commitment Review based on Form Development Plan reflection of one’s (IPCRF-DP) practice and Supporting MOV ongoing • Reflection of one’s practice professional during on LAC sessions with learning proof of attendance • Reflection/Personal Notes Efficiency on Coaching and Mentoring and/or Midyear Review • Personal notes journal on division/school-led INSET with proof of attendance • Certificate of enrolment/ registration form/class card Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review Weight MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal/MT) Results per KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks in graduate/post-graduate school/online courses • Any learning material highlighting the improvement done based on accomplished “reflection” section • Others (please specify and provide annotations)
Basic 12. Performed Proof of: Quality
Education various related Services works/activities • committee involvement that contribute to • advisorship of co-curricular the teaching- activities learning process • involvement as Efficiency (Plus Factor) module/learning material writer . • involvement as module/learning material validator • participation in the RO/SDO/school-initiated TV-/radio-based instruction • book or journal authorship/ contributorship • coordinatorship/ chairpersonship • coaching and mentoring learners in competitions • mentoring pre-service teachers • participation in demonstration teaching • participation as research presenter in a forum/conference Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review Weight MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal/MT) Results per KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks • others (please specify and provide annotations)