groin WHORL TL
Be ssa WHOIL TL
oilding an
fre-Columbian
fpr documenced &
8 using (Pri
Fotumbian textile
Gurafa cave in C
iecorated with
fragments have be
pays, however,
| tied to conser &
{gt discusted t
tt articles on pre
(acaxtla Batle m
“bid” army were
rene represented
tnd McCafferty 1+
fedye decoration
therefore as an act
‘Weaving in a
462), and additio
‘CHAPTER 46
AS THE WHORL TURNS
FUNCTION AND MEANING
IN MESOAMERICAN TEXTILE
PRODUCTION
GEOFFREY McCAFFERTY AND
SHARISSE McCAFFERTY
‘Woven textiles were highly prized commodities in Pre-Columbian
totheextent that they were commonly usd as tribute item and even asa
of value in commercial exchange (Berdan 1987; Hicks 1994). The Codex.
(0982) provides unique insights into textile exchange daring the contact pert
with details on both raw materials and finished product, Beautiful textes
depicted in various artistic representations including murals, sculptures,
pletoral manuscripts. Unfortunately, due to the poor preservation of doth in
region, archaeological textiles are rare. Instead, archaeological correlates of
production, particulary in the form of spindle whos, provide some ofthe
‘evidence for these perishable items. This chapter will discus ways that textile
duction has been approached archaeoogialy in terms ofboth is function
cultural meanings.
Ethnographic textiles from traditional societies throughout Mesoam
have been collected and stdied for over a century (eg, Cordry and Cordry
Foxx etal. 1997). Anthropologists and art historians have documented di
costume styles as they relate to regional identities, as wes the symbolic met
ngs attached to particular design elements. These studies provide glimpe of i
possible levels of meaning that may have exited in Pre-Columbian textiles.RNS.
ING