News Opinion Sport Culture Lifestyle More

A guide to
contemporary A guide to the music of Alfred Schnittke
classical music
Classical music

Tom Service
Mon 29 Apr 2013 16.12
BST

A defiant, even joyous, two fingers to the denizens of stylistic purity … Alfred Schnittke

What constitutes musical truth? Is there really such a thing as musical

authenticity (by which I don't mean using period instruments, or playing
without vibrato) in the sense of giving voice to an absolute sincerity of
emotional or expressive utterance? Or is music a combination of stylistic
convention and structural formula that means composers conceal their true
identity – whatever that might be – so that the search for the single true voice
of a composer is always a confusing game of shadows?

The huge output of Russian composer Alfred Schnittke raises these sorts of
questions – and some even more profound ones about musical meaning and
historical signification. Take this monstrous music for example, his First
Symphony, during whose composition Schnittke coined the phrase
"polystylism" to cope with a musical aesthetic in which the kitchen sink is
just the start of what he chucks into his "symphonic" structure. On the
surface, you're listening to a large-scale, four-movement symphony that lasts
a Mahlerian 75 minutes or more, and which ought to be the heir to a
symphonic tradition whose immediate predecessor, in Russian music, is
Shostakovich. It's also a piece that should signal the start of the mature
composer's style, written when Schnittke was in his mid-30s. But what you
actually hear is an hour-and-a-quarter-long pile-up of musical quotations
and strange symphonic theatre. There are references – more like unabashed
thievings – to melodies and whole musical chunks from Tchaikovsky, from
Strauss and from Chopin; there's even a full-on jazz improvisation in the
middle of the second movement, a set for violin and piano; and the whole
thing is framed by an apocalyptic version of Haydn's Farewell Symphony.
The players come on to the stage during the opening few minutes of the
symphony and they troop off during the final movement leaving a solo
violinist playing Haydn's symphony, only to reassemble to play a gigantic
unison C as the symphony's conclusion. But this is more than a music-
historical joke. Had it lasted a mere 10 minutes or so, you could hear
Schnittke's mashup of the whole of western music as a sophisticated
symphonic gag, a parody of the end of history. But the sheer size of
Schnittke's symphony demands that you take it seriously. And just as he
does not limit himself to any single genre, style or period for his outrageous
symphonic pilferings, you have a range of options as to how you take this
piece.
You could hear it as one of the great embodiments of musical post-
modernism, a defiant and even joyous two fingers to the denizens of stylistic
purity who had held sway, in the West at least, during the immediate post-
war years. At the other extreme, you might feel that this symphony is among
the most nihilistic ever written: instead of even attempting an originality of
voice, instead of a belief in the possibility of musical renewal, all that
remains is to regurgitate the past as a grotesque cavalcade, an enterprise for
which the moniker "symphony" is nothing more than a cynical sticking-
plaster, since any pretence of "symphonic" coherence belongs to another
musical universe than the surreal space that this piece creates.

I'm not sure. I think Schnittke's First Symphony (he wrote eight, left a ninth
unfinished at his death, and there's a Bruckner-style symphony number zero
that he didn't acknowledge as part of his canon) is probably both, neither,
and more than either of those extreme interpretations. Above all, it's a
thrilling and disturbing musical riot if you ever have the chance to hear it
live. But it's also a fragment – albeit a massive, hulking planetoid of a
fragment – of the whole of Schnittke's catalogue of orchestral, vocal,
chamber, theatre and film music, all written in his 63 short years, the last of
them scarred by the series of strokes that would end his life in 1998.

Schnittke: Pianokwintet / Piano Quintet

Reading this on mobile? Click here to watch video

There's much to explore, and much of it is available on YouTube, but to give

you a sense of the range of Schnittke's voices – or masks, or truths – listen
next to his Piano Quintet, written shortly after the First Symphony in the
wake of his mother's death. Where the symphony is a cataclysmic colloquy,
the Quintet sounds like a single-minded expression of lament and loss.
That's because of the directness and the bleakness of its emotional
expression above all in its third and fourth movements, music that Schnittke
said "are real experiences of grief which I would prefer not to comment on
because they are of a very personal nature". The final fifth movement is a
surreal lullaby in which a short melody in the piano part is encircled by
sinister string lines; the music resolves into an image of limbo, as the piano
repeats its tune into the infinite.

So is the quintet the "real" Schnittke, the harbinger of his echt-compositional

voice? Probably not, if you listen now to this piece, one of his most famous:
the Concerto Grosso no. 1, which returns to the hyper-real world of the First
Symphony, but in a more compressed and in a sense still more stylistically
extreme form. In the Concerto Grosso, Schnittke said he wanted to realise
"one of my life's goals … to overcome the gap between 'E' (Ernstmusik,
serious music) and 'U' (Unterhaltung, music for entertainment), even if I
break my neck in doing so!". That means that beneath and within its frame of
pseudo-baroque figuration, you'll hear, as Schnittke's biographer Alexander
Ivashkin says, "the transformation of a cheerful song chorale of Soviet
schoolchildren, a nostalgic atonal serenade, quasi-Corellian allusions" – as
well as Schnittke's grandmother's favourite tango, and quotations from his
film scores. The recitativo central movement, the work's "atonal serenade",
though, rhymes with the Quintet's grief-stricken passages; as if this
movement were the skull beneath the work's polystylistic skin.

So if it's not in the Concerto Grosso, perhaps Schnittke's real voice is music
like this, his Concerto for Mixed Chorus, composed in the mid-1980s, music
that strips back any playing in the mud of music history to make an avowedly
spiritual statement, a piece that confirms Schnittke as a composer of some of
the most important religious music of the late 20th century (born to an
atheist Russian Jewish father in 1934, he converted to Roman Catholicism in
1982). You can hear the same essentially devout spirit animating the Fourth
Symphony, especially its final few minutes, a setting of the Ave Maria that
Schnittke wanted to bring together Jewish, Orthodox, Catholic and Lutheran
ideas and musics.

In his last years, Schnittke composed some of his most austere music, which
seems, on the surface, to be the distillation of his life in music, and a radical
simplification of its means and methods: listen, for example, to the last
movement of the Eighth Symphony, or any of the Ninth, deciphered from
Schnittke's handwriting: because of the strokes he suffered, he was forced to
write with his left hand. Is this, as Gerard McBurney thinks, the Schnittke
whose music will prove the test of time, or will it be his more notorious
polystylistic pieces that will continue to be heard as the heart of his
achievement? Your idea of the real Schnittke will differ from mine, or from
anyone else's for that matter; the real legacy of Schnittke's music lies
precisely in its multidimensional exploration of what musical truth in the
20th century might be, from chaotic polystylism to heartfelt spirituality –
and everything in between.

Five key links

Symphony no 1
Concerto Grosso no 1
Concerto for Mixed Chorus
Piano Quintet
Symphony no 8

… as you’re joining us today from Italy, we have a small favour to ask.

Through these challenging times, millions rely on the Guardian for
independent journalism that stands for truth and integrity. Readers from
180 countries chose to support us financially more than 1.5 million times in
2020.
"I want to thank you for all the times you've kept me sane. In a world
becoming increasingly polarised and more extreme, the Guardian has been
a reassuring beacon of sanity. A plea for calm. An adult in a room full of
screaming children. A little bit of kindness." – Ram Jeyaratnam, Singapore
With your help, we will continue to provide high-impact reporting that can
counter misinformation and offer an authoritative, trustworthy source of
news for everyone. With no shareholders or billionaire owner, we set our
 own agenda and provide journalism that’s free from commercial and
political influence. When it’s never mattered more, we can investigate and
challenge without fear or favour.
Unlike many others, we have maintained our choice: to keep Guardian
journalism open for all readers, regardless of where they live or what they
can afford to pay. We do this because we believe in information equality,
where everyone deserves to read accurate news and thoughtful analysis.
Greater numbers of people are staying well-informed on world events, and
being inspired to take meaningful action.
We aim to offer readers a comprehensive, international perspective on
critical events shaping our world – from the Black Lives Matter movement,
to the new American administration, Brexit, and the world's slow
emergence from a global pandemic. We are committed to upholding our
reputation for urgent, powerful reporting on the climate emergency, and
made the decision to reject advertising from fossil fuel companies, divest
from the oil and gas industries, and set a course to achieve net zero
emissions by 2030.
If there were ever a time to join us, it is now. Every contribution, however
big or small, powers our journalism and sustains our future. Support the
Guardian from as little as €1 – it only takes a minute. If you can, please
consider supporting us with a regular amount each month. Thank you.

Support the Guardian Remind me in July

comments >8@
This discussion is
now closed for
comments but
you can still sign
in or create your
Guardian account
to join the
discussion next
time