Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fei2018 Antelmentik
Fei2018 Antelmentik
Fei2018 Antelmentik
PII: S0928-0987(18)30071-X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2018.02.010
Reference: PHASCI 4407
To appear in: European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Received date: 4 September 2017
Revised date: 17 January 2018
Accepted date: 6 February 2018
Please cite this article as: Chenzhong Fei, Rufeng She, Guiyu Li, Lifang Zhang, Wushun
Fan, suhan Xia, Feiqun Xue , Safety and clinical efficacy of tenvermectin, a novel
antiparasitic 16-membered macrocyclic lactone antibiotics. The address for the
corresponding author was captured as affiliation for all authors. Please check if
appropriate. Phasci(2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2018.02.010
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As
a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The
manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before
it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may
be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the
journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Safety and clinical efficacy of tenvermectin, a novel antiparasitic 16-membered macrocyclic lactone antibiotics
Chenzhong Fei a, Rufeng She a, Guiyu Li b, Lifang Zhang a, Wushun Fan a, suhan Xia a, Feiqun Xue a
a. Key Laboratory for Veterinary Chemical Drugs and Pharmaceutics, Ministry of Agriculture, Shanghai
Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 200241 Shanghai, P.R. China .
b. Zhejiang Hisun Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., 318000, Taizhou, Zhejiang Province, P.R. China
PT
Abstract: Tenvermectin (TVM) is a novel 16-membered macrocyclic lactone antibiotics, which contains
RI
component TVM A and TVM B. However there is not any report on safety and clinical efficacy of TVM for
developing as a potential drug. In order to understand the part of safety and clinical efficacy of TVM, we conducted
SC
the acute toxicity test, the standard bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) test and the clinical deworming test. In the
NU
acute toxicity studies, TVM, TVM A and ivermectin (IVM) were administrated once by oral gavage to mice and
rats. Results showed that the oral LD50 values of TVM, TVM A and IVM in mice were 74.41, 106.95 and 53.06
MA
mg/kg respectively. The oral LD50 values of TVM and TVM A in rats were determined to be 164.22 and 749.34
mg/kg respectively. TVM and IVM are moderately toxic substances, meanwhile the TVM A belongs to low toxic
compounds, implying that the acute toxicity is highly related to the length of side chain of TVM at position C25. In
ED
the Ames test, results showed that TVM did not induce mutagenicity in Salmonella typhimurium TA97a, TA98,
TA100, TA102 and TA1535 with and without metabolic activation system, speculating that the mutagenicity is
PT
probably not related to the side chain at position C25 of 16-membered macrocyclic lactone antibiotics. In the
CE
efficacy trail of TVM against swine nematodes, growing pigs natural infection of Ascaris suum and Trichuris suis
were treated with a single subcutaneous injection 0.3 mg/kg b.w.. Results showed that TVM and IVM had excellent
AC
effect in expelling Ascaris suum, and TVM had potential efficacy against Trichuris suis, however IVM had no
effect on Trichuris suis. This study suggests that the side chain of TVM at position C25 may have important
biological functions, which is one of the key sites of the studies on structure-activity relationship of 16-membered
macrocyclic lactone compounds. TVM is a new compound exhibited some advantages worthy of developing.
Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 02134293396. E-mail addresses: aries@shvri.ac.cn
Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 02134293460. E-mail addresses: fqxue@shvri.ac.cn, feiqun@gmail.com
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Keywords: Tenvermectin; Ivermectin; Oral LD50 values; Bacterial reverse mutation (Ames); Efficacy against
1. Introduction
16-membered macrocyclic lactone antibiotics used as potential pesticides and antiparasitic drugs have attracted
great interest due to their latent high activity and a high margin of safety. Avermectin, ivermectin (IVM) and
milbemycin are well known as representatives of 16-membered macrolide compounds. (Laing et al., 2017; Shoop
PT
et al., 1995; Wang et al., 2016). IVM was first marketed in 1981 and remains the leading worldwide antiparasitic
RI
agent for livestock today. However, as the drug resistance is growing, alternatives or new products with potential
activity are urgently needed (Geurden et al., 2015; McKellar and Benchaoui, 1996; Rodriguez-Hidalgo et al., 2017;
SC
Rodriguez-Vivas et al., 2014). NU
Tenvermectin (TVM) is a kind of new 16-membered macrolide compounds isolated and purified from the
fermentation broth of genetically engineered strain Streptomyces avermitilis MHJ1011, which consists of
MA
The structure of TVM is shown in Fig.1, when R=CH3 named TVM A, and when R=C2H5 named TVM B. Huang
et al. (2015a) reported that TVM showed better pharmacological properties against Tetranychus cinnabarinus and
ED
Bursaphelenchus xylophilus compared with IVM and milbemycin. The composition of TVM A and B in
fermentation products is close to 3: 1 (Pan et al., 2016; Wan et al., 2016). The toxicity of IVM and milbemycins is
PT
related to their bonds with GABA receptor in the CNS of the mammalian host (McKellar and Benchaoui, 1996;
CE
Merola and Eubig, 2012; Rodriguez-Hidalgo et al., 2017). The oral LD50 values of IVM were reported in the range
of 10–50 mg/kg in rats and 28-30 mg/kg in mice (Campbell and Benz, 1984; Dadarkar et al., 2007). However, the
AC
information of safety and clinical efficacy against nematodes of TVM has not been reported and remained unclear
to date. It is important to understand the potential risks and efficacy of TVM against parasites used as a novel
compound. Accordingly, this study conducted the oral acute toxicity test in mice and rats and the standard bacterial
reverse mutation test as well as a clinical deworming test with growing pigs natural infection of ascaris suum and
trichuris suis to determine the efficacy of TVM against swine nematodes. These tests can preliminarily reveal the
druggability of TVM and the structure-activity relationship of 16-membered macrocyclic lactone antibiotics.
TVM A (purity: 90.9%, lot: S140314), TVM B (purity: 93.8%, lot: S140314) and TVM injection (10mL:0.1g,
lot: 141101 ) were obtained from Zhejiang Hisun Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; IVM injection (10mL:0.1g, lot:
A130501Y) and IVM (lot: AD311/11) was purchased from Merial Co. Ltd; TVM is a mixture of TVM A and TVM
B in a ratio of 3: 1 ( prepared by dissolving TVM A and B in ethanol, mixed and dried by nitrogen). Sodium
carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC, Aladdin Industrial Co. Shanghai, China); Nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotide
phosphate (NADP, Merck Co. Rahway, NJ, USA). Glucose-6-phosphate (G6P, Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO,
PT
USA). D-biotin, L-histidine, agar, potassium chloride, sodium chloride and other chemicals were purchased from
RI
SC
2.2. Acute oral toxicity study
2.2.1. Animals NU
Male and female specific pathogen-free Kunming (KM) mice weighing 15 g to 17 g were purchased from the
Shanghai Slac Laboratory Animal Centre of Chinese Academy of Sciences (SLAC CAS). Male and female specific
MA
pathogen-free Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats weighing 160 g to180 g were obtained from the SLAC CAS. The license
number of mice and rats were SCXK (Hu) 2012-0002 and SCXK (Hu) 2007-0005 respectively. The mice and rats
were quarantined in a pathogen-free, well-ventilated room in our institute to enable them to acclimatize their
ED
environment for 5 days prior to the initiation of study. The animals were housed in wire-topped polypropylene
cages with rice husk bedding and maintained under standard laboratory conditions at a temperature of 23 ± 2 °C, a
PT
relative humidity of 50% ± 10% and a photoperiod of 12 h. The feed in pellet form matched the Chinese standard
CE
“Laboratory animal rats and mice feed” (GB14924.3-2010) was purchased from the SLAC CAS. The animals were
given food and water ad libitum. All the animals used in our studies were in accordance with “Guide for the Care
AC
and Use of Laboratory Animals” NIH Publication and approved by the Shanghai Veterinary Research Institutional
To obtain the LD50 of TVM, the experiments were designed in accordance with the method provided by the
Chinese Toxicology Assessment Procedures and Methods for Food Safety (Chinese Standard, GB 15193.3, 2003).
Animals were fasting for 12h before administration. The dosage levels of test compounds in mice and rats were
determined through a pre-testing. In this experiments, after 5 d periods of quarantine and acclimatization, healthy
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
mice weighing 18 g to 22 g and rats weighing 180 g to 220 g of either sex were marked and randomly divided into
groups. The test compounds of different concentrations were prepared by serial dilutions using 0.5% sodium
carboxymethyl cellulose solution. The volumes of suspension by oral gavages were approximately 0.2 mL/10 g
weight for mice and 1 mL/100 g weight for rats. KM mice (5 males and 5 females each group) treatments with
different levels of TVM, TVM A and IVM were shown in Table 1 to 3. SD rats (6 males and 6 females each group)
treatment with TVM were shown in Table 4. SD rats (5 males and 5 females each group) treatment with TVM A
were shown in Table 5. Changes in behavior and mortality of animals were observed and recorded for 14 days.
PT
Evaluations included observations of appearance, respiratory, salivation, tremors and convulsions, motor activity,
RI
gait and posture, reactivity to handling and bizarre behavior (e.g. walking backwards). These animals died during
the study were necropsied, and the time of death was recorded as precisely as possible. At the end of the test,
SC
surviving animals were sacrificed and necropsied. The LD50 values and 95% confidence intervals were calculated
NU
using the Bliss method by the software of Drug and Statistics 3.0 (Bliss, 1934, 1935).
MA
TVM was assayed via the Ames test by standard plate-incorporation assay according to OECD Guideline (471,
1997) and China standard for Ames (GB 15193.4-2003). Histidine requiring Salmonella typhimurium (TA97a, lot:
ED
4366D; TA98, lot: 4367D; TA100, lot: 4370D; TA102, lot: 4372D and TA1535, lot: 4369D) used in this study
were obtained from Molecular Toxicology Inc. (Boone, NC, USA). The preliminary Ames test was performed both
PT
with and without the S9 activation system. The metabolic activation system (S9 mix) was freshly prepared before
each test by use of an Aroclor-1254 induced rat liver fraction (S9, lot: 3369, MolTox™, Boone, NC, USA). TVM
CE
were dissolved in Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO, 99.99% of purity, Sigma–Aldrich Chemical Co.) to be a final
AC
concentration of 50.0 mg/mL that was assigned for the highest test concentration (50000 ug/mL) and serially
diluted with DMSO for lower test concentrations (16667, 5556, 1852, 617, 206, 69 ug/mL). The mutagenicity
assay was carried out in both the presence and absence of metabolic activation system along with the negative and
positive controls as described in OECD Guideline No. 471. The positive control materials were purchased from
Sigma–Aldrich Chemicals Co. as follows: TA97a (1.0 ug/plate, ICR-191, cas:17070-45-0, lot: SLBD9266V),
TA98 (1.0 ug/plate, 2-nitrofluorene, cas:607-57-8, lot: S43858V), TA100 and TA1535 (2.0 ug/plate, Sodium azide,
cas:26628-22-8, lot: 063M7386), TA102 (1.0 ug/plate, methyl methanesulfonate, cas:66-27-3, lot:87596LJ), all
stains plus S9 (30.0 ug/plate for TA102 and 3.0 ug/plate for others, 2-Aminoanthracene, cas:613-13-8,
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
lot:STBD3302V). Each treatment was made in triplicate. Test plates per concentration were incubated at 37℃ for
48 h and then counted. The mutagenic index (MI) was calculated for each dose as the average number of revertants
per plate divided by the average number of revertants per plate of the negative (solvent) control. For test strains
TA97a, TA98, TA100 and TA102, a sample was considered positive when MI was above 2 for at least one of the
test doses, and when the response was dose dependent. The MI for a positive response of strain TA1535 was more
than 3 for at least one concentration level and showed dose-response relationship with or without S9 (Biso et al.,
2010).
PT
RI
2.4. Efficacy of TVM against swine nematodes
SC
16 growing pigs parasite-infected naturally, weighing 30–35 kg (females or castrated males), were purchased
NU
from individual farmers and housed in the swine barn. Each pig was selected by two consecutive days fecal
samples examined positive significantly for nematode worm eggs, and one of them selected randomly was
MA
necropsied for confirming Ascaris suum and Trichuris suis infection. Pigs were individually ear-tagged and fed a
corn, soybean-based complete ground diet formulated for the growth stage. Pens were separated from each other by
solid concrete and provided with nipple waterer and self-feeder. Pigs were observed daily during the trial.
ED
15 pigs were randomly blocked into two groups, 10 pigs for TVM treatment group and 5 pigs for IVM treatment
PT
control. On Day 2 and 1 before adminstration and day 7 and 8, day 14 and 15, day 21 and 22, day 28 and 29 after
CE
dose, fecal samples were taken from each pig and the faecal egg counts (FEC) were determined using an modified
McMaster technique with a sensitivity of 30 eggs per gram of faeces (EPG) (Rinaldi et al., 2011). The eggs of
AC
Ascaris suum and Trichuris suis were identified by Morphological characteristic structures (Hennessy et al., 2006;
Peña-Espinoza et al., 2016). Pigs were administrated TVM and IVM with a single subcutaneous injection 0.3
mg/kg body weight (recommended dose of IVM), and sacrificed on day 30 after treatment. The intestinal contents
and lungs were examined for nematodes according to standard parasitological procedures (Hennessy et al., 2006).
Adult and larval worms were collected, identified and counted by standard parasitological techniques for
The efficacy of treatment was evaluated by FEC of each pig before and after treatments, or between different
treatments. The faecal egg counts reduction rate (FECR%) and the fecal eggs positive rate were calculated and
compared. The data of FEC were transformed to log (EPG+1) and subjected to a two-way analysis of variance
using the software of Drug and Statistics 3.0 and treatment effect was tested for significance at the 0.05 level
3. Results
PT
3.1. Acute toxicity study
RI
3.1.1 Acute toxicity of IVM
Mice in control groups dosed with IVM, some adverse effects such as hypoactivity, debility, curl up and
SC
trembling were obviously observed 4 h after the oral administration. These effects became more serious until to
NU
death in higher dose groups. Most of the death occurred between 12 and 24 h after administration. The results of
oral acute toxicity of IVM in mice summarized in Table 1. The oral LD50 values of IVM were determined to be
MA
53.06 mg/kg b.w. with 95% confidence intervals ranging from approximately 48.72 to 58.34 mg/kg.
The poisoning symptoms of animals mainly occurred at 2-3 hours after administration. The mice and rats
ED
exhibited restless, debility, curl up, depression, ataxia, shortness of breath, trembling and death. In lower dose
groups, mildly poisoned animals gradually increased the activities and recovered mostly 2-4 h after administration.
PT
In higher dose groups, severe symptoms of poisoning and death were clearly observed and the degree of poisoning
CE
symptoms was directly proportional to the dosage. The peak of death time of mice and rats was during 8-12 h after
administration and all deaths occurred within 1 day after administration. No obvious organ abnormalities were
AC
visible in the animal necropsy. The results of the oral acute toxicity of TVM were summarized in Table 2 and 3.
The oral LD50 values of TVM in mice and rats were determined to be 74.41 mg/kg b.w. and 164.22 mg/kg
b.w. ,with 95% confidence intervals ranging from approximately 65.99 to 83.42 mg/kg and 135.50 to 201.36 mg/kg,
respectively.
The results of the oral acute toxicity of TVM A in mice and rats were summarized in Table 4 and 5. Adverse
effects such as hypoactivity, debility, curl up, shortness of breath, trembling and death were obviously observed at
3 h after administration and these effects were more serious and persistent at higher doses. The animals with mild
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
poisoning symptoms generally recovered after 12 h. Times of the death of mice and rats induced by severe side
effects were mainly at 8 to 36 h after administration. Most surviving animals gradually recovered the feeding and
activities at 3th day after administration. However one moribund mouse died at 4th day after administration and one
rat appeared delayed death at 10th day after administration. No distinctly organ abnormalities were seen in the
autopsy of mice and rats. According to dose levels and the numbers of dead animals, the oral LD50 values of TVM
A in mice and rats were determined to be 106.95 mg/kg and 749.34 mg/kg, with 95% confidence intervals ranging
from approximately 103.78 to 110.22 mg/kg and 653.86 to 858.87 mg/kg, respectively.
PT
RI
3.2. Bacterial reverse mutation assay
The test material TVM was suspended in DMSO and the concentrations of drug ranged from 6.8 to 5000 ug/plate
SC
in the presence and absence of the S9 mix. The results of the S. typhimurium reverse mutation assay in the presence
NU
and absence of metabolic activation are shown in Table 6. The numbers of revertants for the vehicle controls in the
presence and absence of the S9 mix for all test strains were in the scope of the negative controls and the numbers of
MA
revertants increased remarkably in all positive control compared to negative control. The mutagenicity index (MI)
for all positive control materials were above 3. The range of MIs for the test material in the presence of the S9 mix
for strains TA97a, TA98, TA100, TA102 and TA1535 were 0.8-1.1, 0.8-0.9, 1.0-1.1, 1.1 and 0.9-1.1, respectively.
ED
The range of MIs in absence of the S9 mix for strains TA97a, TA98, TA100, TA102 and TA1535 were 1.0-1.2,
0.9-1.2, 0.9-1.1, 0.9-1.0 and 1.0-1.4, respectively. Amounts of the particle tended to precipitate in the plates but did
PT
not to obscure the background at the concentration of 1667 ug/plate and 5000ug/plate. The number of revertants in
CE
the level of treatment were not significantly higher than that of revertants in negative control. MIs were not
observed to increase more than two fold with the S. typhimurium TA97a, TA98, TA100, TA102 and TA1535
AC
strains after treatment with or without S9 mix. There was no evidence of cytotoxicity in all bacterial systems used
in mutation assay.
The clinical adverse reactions were not observed after therapy. Results of scolecology examinations for each pig
before and after administration are shown in table 7 to 8. One week after TVM treatment, the FEC of Ascaris suum
and Trichuris suis decreased significantly (p<0.05), but egg positive rate did not decrease obviously. Two weeks
after administration, the FECR% and positive rate of Ascaris suum all decreased obviously (p<0.05). Four weeks
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
after administration, the negative rate of Ascaris eggs and Trichuris eggs were 100% and 99.43%, suggesting that
TVM had potential effect against Ascaris suum and Trichuris suis. Meanwhile, pigs after IVM treatment, the FECR%
and positive rate of Ascaris suum all decreased obviously (p<0.05), but did not decrease significantly for Trichuris
suis (p>0.05), indicating that IVM had good efficacy against Ascaris suum but limited effect on Trichuris suis.
Necropsy found roundworms in one pig for each group and whipworms in two pigs in TVM groups and five pigs in
IVM groups respectively. This study revealed that TVM and IVM had similar good efficacy against Ascaris and
PT
RI
4. Discussion
The molecule of TVM,IVM and milbemycin differs from each other only at one position. The TVM differs
SC
from IVM at position C25 substituent group and differs from milbemycin at position C13 substituent group. IVM
NU
contains at least 80% of 22, 23-dihydroavermectin B1a and less than 20% 22, 23-dihydroavermectin B1b. The
main active ingredient is the 22, 23-dihydroavermectin B1a (Huang et al., 2015b; McKellar and Benchaoui, 1996;
MA
Wan et al., 2016). TVM is a mixture of TVM A and TVM B in a ratio of 3:1, which is expected to reduce the
production cost substantially. However, it is necessary to understand the pharmacological properties of different
components during research process, which can provide the references for developing other similar new drugs
ED
showing practical significance (Arsic et al., 2017; Wan et al., 2017a; Wan et al., 2017b). Therefore, this
preliminary study evaluated the acute toxicity of TVM and components TVM A respectively.
PT
Acute toxicity tests were used to compare relatively acute hazards of chemicals, especially for new compounds
CE
that no other toxicology data are available (Wu et al., 2014). The LD50 values of drugs are generally the beginning
of safety evaluation. It is also an important reference criteria on the classification of relative toxicity of drug
AC
compounds (Copplestone, 1988; OECD, 2001). As the result of acute toxicity test is influenced by many factors,
such as the strains and ages of experimental animals, the environment and the time of fasting, the results of
different laboratories are quite different (Dadarkar et al., 2007; Wu et al., 2015). Therefore, this experiments set up
the similar drug IVM as a control, and the LD50 value of TVM acquired under the same conditions for IVM can
objectively compared the difference of acute toxicity of both. The relative toxicity classification of different
structures of new compounds is helpful for understanding the relationship between structure and toxicity, which is
conducive to the development of new drugs and further selection of target compounds.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
In this acute toxicity test, there were no obvious organ abnormalities on necropsy. The poisoning symptoms
pointed to neurotoxicity and the influence of central nervous may be the reason of death of animals, consistent with
reports of the acute toxicity symptoms of similar drug (Campbell and Benz, 1984; McKellar and Benchaoui, 1996).
The calculated LD50 value of TVM, TVM A and IVM for KM mice were 74.41, 106.95 and 53.06 mg/kg
respectively, indicating that the relative toxicity of TVM was lower than that of IVM, and the new compound with
directional modification had some advantages (Huang et al., 2015a). The results of acute toxicity for SD rats
showed that the acute toxicity of TVM A was significantly lower than that of TVM, and the oral LD50 values of
PT
TVM and TVM A were 164.22 and 749.39 mg/kg respectively, According to the World Health Organization’s
RI
recommended classification of the relative toxicity of chemicals, TVM is a moderately toxic substance while TVM
A belongs to a low toxic compound (Copplestone, 1988; Dadarkar et al., 2007). Since TVM is a mixture of TVM A
SC
and B in a ratio of 3:1, it is speculated that the relative toxicity of TVM B is higher, and TVM B is the main reason
NU
that the acute toxicity of TVM was significantly higher than that of TVM A.
The molecule of TVM A and TVM B differs at position C25 substituent with methyl or ethyl respectively, and
MA
the difference of acute toxicity obviously suggests that the site may have important biological functions, which is
one of the key sites studied on structure-activity relationship. The side chain of C25 in TVM is consistent with the
similar drug milbemycin and shorter than IVM. It is reported that milbemycins is similar to TVM with lower
ED
toxicity (McKellar and Benchaoui, 1996; Shoop et al., 1995). Therefore, it is implied that the length of side chain at
position C25 is highly related to the toxicity of 16-membered macrocyclic lactone compounds. Further studies are
PT
The Ames test has been used worldwide as an initial screening to determine the mutagenic potential of new
chemicals and drugs. The mutagenicity for chemicals is a crucial factor for druggability and an important basis for
AC
drug screening (Fei et al., 2015; OECD, 1997; Shim et al., 2008). TVM had no mutagenicity to Salmonella
typhimurium TA97a, TA98, TA100, TA102 and TA1535 with and without metabolic activation system, consistent
with the reports of the same kind of drugs (Campbell and Benz, 1984; Campbell et al., 1983; Sutherland and
Campbell, 1990). However, there are many factors affecting the inherent toxicity of the compounds. Therefore, a
series of mutagenicity and genotoxicity tests are needed to further evaluate the safety of TVM on the basis of
determination of the more valuable components (Jena et al., 2002). TVM is a novel compound and its structure
differs from IVM only at position C25 substituent group, speculating that the mutagenicity is probably not related
IVM is a first-line deworming drug, and ascariasis and trichuriasis are the most serious parasitic diseases in
swine (Laing et al., 2017). The activity of TVM against T. cinnabarinus in vitro is higher than that of IVM, and the
activity of TVM against ascariasis and trichuriasis in vivo has not been reported (Huang et al., 2015a). For
evaluating the anthelmintic activity of TVM preliminarily, growing pigs that naturally infected with Ascaris suum
and Trichuris suis were screened and confirmed for this experiment. The dosage of TVM and IVM were all set to
0.3 mg/kg b.w. with a single subcutaneous injection, which is the recommended dose of IVM (Campbell and Benz,
1984). It is more convenient to compare the activity of these two similar compounds. The results showed that TVM
PT
and IVM with a single subcutaneous injection 0.3 mg/kg b.w. had good effect in expelling Ascaris suum,and
RI
TVM also had potential effect against Trichuris suis. The result of TVM against trichuriasis is not completely
SC
consistent with the reports on the role of IVM (Campbell and Benz, 1984; Campbell et al., 1983; Laing et al., 2017).
Because of the restrictions of clinical animal quantities, further studies are needed to verify the effectiveness of
NU
TVM against Trichuris suis infection.
TVM had similar safety and anthelmintic activity to IVM. However, the activity of TVM against trichuriasis
MA
occurs prior to that of IVM. Huang et al. (2015a) also reported the enhance activities of TVM against T.
cinnabarinus and B. xylophilus. Because of the difference only at position C25 substituent groups, we speculated
that the action mechanisms of both drugs are roughly the same. Recent studies confirmed that glutamate gated
ED
chloride channel is a more important target for these kinds of drug, and the GABA receptor is a secondary target.
The biological activity of these compounds is different in higher animals, showing that there may exist other targets
PT
of action (Feng et al., 2002; Wang et al., 2016). It can be postulated that the targets of action of TVM is different
CE
from that of IVM (Prichard et al., 2012).The focus of further studies should be verify the safety and effectiveness of
TVM and evaluated the cross-resistance between TVM and IVM (George, 2017; Prichard et al., 2012). TVM may
AC
have difference target and medicinal basis worthy of developing as a new drug.
5. Conclusion
The acute toxicity of TVM is lower than that of IVM. TVM and IVM were all moderately toxic substance
according to the classification of the relative toxicity. Meanwhile, the acute toxicity of TVM A was significantly
lower than that of TVM, which belongs to a low toxic compound, indicating that the length of side chain of TVM
at position C25 is highly related to the toxicity of these kinds of compounds. The Ames test results were all
negative for Salmonella typhimurium TA97a, TA98, TA100, TA102 and TA1535 with and without metabolic
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
activation system, illustrating that TVM may have no genotoxicity. TVM and IVM with a single subcutaneous
injection 0.3 mg/kg b.w. had excellent efficacy against Ascaris suum, and only TVM had potential effect on
Trichuris suis. This study suggests that TVM had some advantages and the structure of TVM at position C25 may
have important biological functions. TVM has a medicinal basis worthy of developping, especially component
PT
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by The National Key Research and Development Program of China
RI
(2016YFD0501303) and The Special Fund for Agro-Scientific Research in the Public Interest (201303038–9).
SC
Reference
NU
Andre, W.P., Ribeiro, W.L., Cavalcante, G.S., dos Santos, J.M., Macedo, I.T., de Paula, H.C., de Freitas, R.M., de Morais, S.M., de
Melo, J.V., Bevilaqua, C.M., 2016. Comparative efficacy and toxic effects of carvacryl acetate and carvacrol on sheep gastrointestinal
MA
Arsic, B., Barber, J., Čikoš, A., Mladenovic, M., Stankovic, N., Novak, P., 2017. 16-Membered Macrolide Antibiotics: a Review.
Biso, F.I., Rodrigues, C.M., Rinaldo, D., Reis, M.B.D., Bernardi, C.C., De Mattos, J.C.P., Caldeiradearaujo, A., Vilegas, W., Colus,
I.M.D.S., Varanda, E.A., 2010. Assessment of DNA damage induced by extracts, fractions and isolated compounds of Davilla nitida
PT
and Davilla elliptica (Dilleniaceae). Mutation Research-genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 702, 92-99.
Bliss, C.I., 1934. The method of probits. Science (New York, N.Y.) 79, 38-39.
CE
Bliss, C.I., 1935. The calculation of the dosage-mortality curve. Annals of Applied Biology 22, 134-167.
Campbell, W.C., Benz, G.W., 1984. Ivermectin: a review of efficacy and safety. Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics
AC
7, 1-16.
Campbell, W.C., Fisher, M.H., Stapley, E.O., Albers-Schonberg, G., Jacob, T.A., 1983. Ivermectin: a potent new antiparasitic agent.
Copplestone, J.F., 1988. The development of the WHO Recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard. Bulletin of The World
Dadarkar, S.S., Deore, M.D., Gatne, M.M., 2007. Comparative evaluation of acute toxicity of ivermectin by two methods after single
Fei, C., Zhang, J., Lin, Y., Wang, X., Zhang, K., Zhang, L., Zheng, W., Wang, M., Li, T., Xiao, S., 2015. Safety evaluation of a
triazine compound nitromezuril by assessing bacterial reverse mutation, sperm abnormalities, micronucleus and chromosomal
Feng, X., Hayashi, J., Beech, R.N., Prichard, R.K., 2002. Study of the nematode putative GABA type-A receptor subunits: evidence
George, D.P., 2017. The Macrolide Antibiotic Renaissance. Br J Pharmacol 174, 2967–2983.
Geurden, T., Chartier, C., Fanke, J., di Regalbono, A.F., Traversa, D., von Samson-Himmelstjerna, G., Demeler, J., Vanimisetti, H.B.,
Bartram, D.J., Denwood, M.J., 2015. Anthelmintic resistance to ivermectin and moxidectin in gastrointestinal nematodes of cattle in
PT
Europe. International Journal for Parasitology: Drugs and Drug Resistance 5, 163-171.
Hennessy, D.R., Bauer, C., Boray, J.C., Conder, G.A., Daugschies, A., Johansen, M.V., Maddox-Hyttel, C., Roepstorff, A., 2006.
RI
World association for the advancement of veterinary parasitology (WAAVP): second edition of guidelines for evaluating the efficacy
SC
of anthelmintics in swine. Veterinary Parasitology 141, 138.
Huang, J., Chen, A.-L., Zhang, H., Yu, Z., Li, M.-H., Li, N., Lin, J.-T., Bai, H., Wang, J.-D., Zheng, Y.-G., 2015a. Gene replacement
NU
for the generation of designed novel avermectin derivatives with enhanced acaricidal and nematicidal activities. Applied and
Huang, J., Chen, A.L., Zhang, H., Yu, Z., Li, M.H., Li, N., Lin, J.T., Bai, H., Wang, J.D., Zheng, Y.G., 2015b. Gene Replacement for
MA
the Generation of Designed Novel Avermectin Derivatives with Enhanced Acaricidal and Nematicidal Activities. Appl Environ
Jena, G.B., Kaul, C.L., Ramarao, P., 2002. Genotoxicity testing, a regulatory requirement for drug discovery and development: Impact
Dhawan, A., Bajpayee, M. (Eds.), Genotoxicity Assessment: Methods and Protocols. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp. 431-458.
PT
Laing, R., Gillan, V., Devaney, E., 2017. Ivermectin - Old Drug, New Tricks? Trends Parasitol 33, 463-472.
McKellar, Q.A., Benchaoui, H.A., 1996. Avermectins and milbemycins. Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics 19, 331-
CE
351.
Merola, V.M., Eubig, P.A., 2012. Toxicology of avermectins and milbemycins (macrocylic lactones) and the role of P-glycoprotein in
AC
dogs and cats. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 42, 313-333, vii.
OECD Guideline 471, 1997. OECD Guideline for the testing of chemicals. Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test.
OECD Guideline 420, 2001. OECD Guideline for the testing of chemicals. Acute Oral Toxicity.
Pan, J.J., Wan, X., Zhang, S.Y., Huang, J., Zhang, H., Chen, A.L., Wang, J.D., 2016. Three new 16-membered macrolide compounds
from a genetically engineered strain S. avermitilis MHJ1011. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 26, 3376-3379.
Peña-Espinoza, M., Thamsborg, S.M., Denwood, M.J., Drag, M., Hansen, T.V., Jensen, V.F., Enemark, H.L., 2016. Efficacy of
ivermectin against gastrointestinal nematodes of cattle in Denmark evaluated by different methods for analysis of faecal egg count
reduction. International Journal for Parasitology: Drugs and Drug Resistance 6, 241-250.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Prichard, R., Ménez, C., Lespine, A., 2012. Moxidectin and the avermectins: Consanguinity but not identity. International Journal for
Rinaldi, L., Coles, G.C., Maurelli, M.P., Musella, V., Cringoli, G., 2011. Calibration and diagnostic accuracy of simple flotation,
McMaster and FLOTAC for parasite egg counts in sheep. Veterinary Parasitology 177, 345-352.
Rodriguez-Hidalgo, R., Perez-Otanez, X., Garces-Carrera, S., Vanwambeke, S.O., Madder, M., Benitez-Ortiz, W., 2017. The current
status of resistance to alpha-cypermethrin, ivermectin, and amitraz of the cattle tick (Rhipicephalus microplus) in Ecuador. PloS one
12, e0174652.
Rodriguez-Vivas, R.I., Miller, R.J., Ojeda-Chi, M.M., Rosado-Aguilar, J.A., Trinidad-Martinez, I.C., Perez de Leon, A.A., 2014.
PT
Acaricide and ivermectin resistance in a field population of Rhipicephalus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) collected from red deer (Cervus
RI
Shim, S.M., Choi, M.H., Kim, G.H., 2008. Safety evaluation of Elsholtzia splendens extracts: assessment of acute toxicity and
SC
mutagenicity. Food Chem Toxicol 46, 1042-1047.
Shoop, W.L., Mrozik, H., Fisher, M.H., 1995. Structure and activity of avermectins and milbemycins in animal health. Vet Parasitol
NU
59, 139-156.
Sutherland, I.H., Campbell, W.C., 1990. Development, pharmacokinetics and mode of action of ivermectin. Acta Leidensia 59, 161-
168.
MA
Wan, X., Zhang, S.-y., Zhang, H., Zhai, J., Huang, J., Chen, A. L., Wang, J. D., 2016. New tenvermectin analogs obtained by
microbial conversion with Saccharopolyspora erythraea. The Journal of Antibiotics 70, 190-194
ED
Wan, X., Zhang, S.-Y., Zhang, H., Zhai, J., Huang, J., Chen, A.-L., Wang, J.-D., 2017a. Two new tenvermectins from a genetically
engineered strain Streptomyces avermitilis MHJ1011. Journal of Asian natural products research 19, 327-332.
Wan, X., Zhang, S.Y., Zhang, H., Zhai, J., Huang, J., Chen, A.L., Wang, J.D., 2017b. New tenvermectin analogs obtained by
PT
Wang, C.-X., Ding, R., Jiang, S.-T., Tang, J.-S., Hu, D., Chen, G.-D., Lin, F., Hong, K., Yao, X.-S., Gao, H., 2016. Aldgamycins J–O,
CE
16-Membered Macrolides with a Branched Octose Unit from Streptomycetes sp. and Their Antibacterial Activities. Journal of Natural
Wu, H., Xiao, W., Zhang, K., Xue, F., Zhang, C., Yan, M., Wang, X., Jiang, S., 2014. Acute and subchronic toxicity of arprinocid in
Wu, X., Wan, D., Xie, C., Li, T., Huang, R., Shu, X., Ruan, Z., Deng, Z., Yin, Y., 2015. Acute and sub-acute oral toxicological
evaluations and mutagenicity of N-carbamylglutamate (NCG). Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 73, 296-302.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
Figure 1. The structures of tenvermectin. A: R=CH3; B: R=CH2CH3
RI
SC
NU
MA
ED
PT
71 20.0±0.40 5/5 20.7±0.76 5/5 100%
RI
Dose Males Females Mortality
mg/kg Weight/g Number of dead/dosed Weight/g Number of dead/dosed %
42 18.9±0.88 0/5 19.6±0.67 0/5 0%
SC
50 18.8±0.89 1/5 19.3±0.66 0/5 10%
61 21.4±0.47 2/5 19.2±0.55 1/5 30%
73 21.4±0.68 4/5 20.9±0.64 2/5 60%
NU
87 19.0±0.64 5/5 18.7±0.58 3/5 80%
105 19.2±0.89 5/5 19.8±1.22 3/5 80%
125 19.0±0.72 5/5 20.2±0.25 5/5 100%
MA
Table 6 Mutagenic activity and mutagenic index (MI) of tenvermectin in TA97a, TA98, TA100, TA102 and TA1535 Salmonella
typhimurium strains in the absence (− S9) and in the presence (+ S9) of metabolization.
TA97a TA98 TA100 TA102 TA1535
S
Group
9 Rev/plate MI Rev/plate MI Rev/plate MI Rev/plate MI Rev/plate MI
PT
PC -S9mix - 499±60.92 238±4.36 694±38.43 6.0
0 2 9 4 7 4
1. 0.
6.86 ug/plate - 85.7±6.03 29±3.46 0.9 115.3±6.81 0.9 303±6 12.3±0.58 1.1
2 9
1. 0.
20.58 ug/plate - 91.3±7.23 271.73 1.1 121.7±5.13 0.9 301±5 16.3±2.31 1.1
RI
0 9
1. 1.
61.73 ug/plate - 92.3±5.77 25.33.79 1.2 121.3±4.51 1.0 295.3±9.5 14.7±3.21 1.2
0 0
SC
1. 1.
185.19 ug/plate - 94±3 25.3±6.43 1.1 115.3±3.06 1.0 281±11 11±1.73 1.0
1 0
1. 1.
555.56 ug/plate - 84±6.08 27.3±6.81 1.1 119±3.46 1.1 299±6.24 13.3±3.79 1.3
1 0
NU
1666.67 1. 1.
- 80.7±8.14 25±6.08 1.2 106.3±1.15 1.1 268.7±4.16 12±4 1.4
ug/plate 1 0
1. 1.
5000 ug/plate - 101±6.93 20.7±2.52 1.2 109.3±1.53 1.0 272.7±3.21 12.3±1.53 1.1
0 0
MA
0. 1.
ED
6.86 ug/plate + 118.3±6.66 31.3±0.58 0.9 124±3.46 1.1 278.7±6.43 16.3±2.08 1.1
8 1
0. 1.
20.58 ug/plate + 110.3±2.52 34.3±4.16 0.9 128±1 1.0 284.7±15.04 14.3±3.06 1.1
9 1
120.3±11.9 0. 1.
61.73 ug/plate + 32±5 0.9 120.31.15 1.1 290.7±6.66 14.7±1.53 0.9
PT
3 9 1
0. 1.
185.19 ug/plate + 99.7±3.06 32.3±1.15 0.8 116.39.29 1.0 275.7±5.86 16±2.65 1.1
9 1
CE
1. 1.
555.56 ug/plate + 97.3±7.57 37.3±2.31 0.8 123±6.24 1.1 284.7±15.18 14.3±3.21 1.0
1 1
1666.67 1. 115.3±11.5 1.
+ 100.7±6.43 36.3±3.06 0.8 1.1 285.7±13.58 16.3±2.52 0.9
ug/plate 0 9 1
1. 1.
AC
5000 ug/plate + 92.3±11.06 38±6.08 0.8 124.7±1.15 1.1 298.7±7.77 16.3±3.06 1.1
1 1
-S9, without metabolic activation; +S9, with metabolic activation (500 uL of 10% S9 mix/plate); S9, an Aroclor-1254 induced rat liver;
NC, negative (solvent) controls; PC, positive controls; Rev, number of revertants.
Positive controls without S9 activation were ICR-191 (1.0 μg/plate) for strains TA97a, 2-nitrofluorene (1.0 μg /plate) for strain TA98,
methyl methanesulfonate (1.0 ug/plate) for strain TA102, sodium azide (2.0 μg /plate) for strain TA100 and TA1535.
Positive controls with S9 activation were 2-aminoanthracene (3.0μg / plate) for strains TA97, TA98, TA100 and TA1535, 2-
aminoanthracene (30.0μg / plate) for strain TA102
MI, mutagenicity index: number of revertants induced in the sample/number of spontaneous revertants in the negative (solvent)
controls.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Table 7 Ascaris suum examinations for each pig before and after administration
Tenvermectin,n=10 Ivermectin,n=5
Time of collection
positive rate of eggs Mean FEC(epg) positive rate of eggs Mean FEC(epg)
Before administration 100% 3114 100% 1842
1 week after administration 80% 173 *a 20% 15*
2 weeks after administration 30% 5* 0% 0*
3 weeks after administration 0% 0* 0% 0*
4 weeks after administration 0% 0* 0% 0*
FECR% 100.0% 100.0%
The asterisk (*) indicates the significantly differences of FEC between administration before and after in the columes (P < 0.05);
PT
The lowercase letter(a) indicates the significantly different of FEC between groups treatment with TVM and IVM in the rows (P
RI
< 0.05).
FEC (epg), feacal egg counts (eggs per gram of faeces); FECR%, faecal egg counts reduction rate.
SC
NU
Table 8 Trichuris suis examinations for each pig before and after administration
Tenvermectin,n=10 Ivermectin,n=5
Time of collection
positive rate of eggs Mean FEC(epg) positive rate of eggs Mean FEC(epg)
MA
The asterisk (*) indicates the significantly differences of FEC between administration before and after in the columes (P < 0.05);
The lowercase letter(a) indicates the significantly different of FEC between groups treatment with TVM and IVM in the rows (P
CE
< 0.05).
FEC (epg), feacal egg counts (eggs per gram of faeces); FECR%, faecal egg counts reduction rate.
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
SC
NU
Graphical abstract
MA
ED
PT
CE
AC