Professional Documents
Culture Documents
W4 Industrial Hygiene
W4 Industrial Hygiene
W4 Industrial Hygiene
Recap on W3 Toxicology
Go to www.menti.com and use this code: 6628580
Open
Instructional Learning Objectives
Open 2
Industrial Hygiene
Open 4
Identification
Requires study of
CHEMICAL PROCESS • Process design
• Operating instructions
OPERATING CONDITIONS • Safety reviews
• Equipment description
OPERATING PROCEDURES
• Chemical properties SDS’s
OTHER ………. • Other ……
POTENTIAL HAZARDS HAZARD DATA
• liquids • physical state / vapor pressure
• vapors • TLV’s
• dusts • temperature sensitivity
• noise • rate and heat of reaction
• radiation • by-products
• temperature • reactivity with other chemicals
• mechanical • explosion limits
• other….. • other…..
RISK ASSESSMENT: potential for hazard to result in an accident 5
Evaluation : Measurement of Exposure
Open 6
Evaluating Volatiles
Monitoring air concentrations Variation in time and place
Conc.
0 Timeà tw
7
Evaluating Volatiles
1 i
Intermittent: TWA = å Ci Ti
8 1
Time (hr) Conc. (ppm)
0 100
1 100 C
1.9 95
à
2.5 90
3.1 80
3.8 70 0 1 1.9 2.5 3.1 3.8 4
Time (hrs)à
8
Evaluating Exposures to Toxicant:
Time Weighted Average
1w
t
C1T1 + C2T2 + ...... + CnTn
TWA = ò C (t )dt TWA =
80 8 hrs
C(t) is the concentration of a toxicant in the air in ppm or mg/m3
tw is the worker shift time in hours
Open 9
Example of TWA Calculation
Open 11
Evaluating Exposures to Toxicant:
TWA for Mixture
åC i
(TLV - TWA) mix = n
i =1
Ci
å
i =1 (TLV - TWA)i
Open 12
Evaluating Exposures to Toxicant:
TWA for Mixture
Mixture:
§ Methyl isopropyl ketone @ 100 ppm
(TLV = 200ppm)
§ Methylcyclohexane @ 300ppm (TLV = 400ppm)
§ Both TLVs set for protection against anesthetic
(CNS) effects
Ventilation rate, Qv
(volume/time) Volatile rate Out
kQvC (mass/time)
Open 14
Estimating Volatiles
Ventilation rate Volatile rate out
Qv (m3/s) VC kQvC (kg/s)
Qm (kg/s)
Evolution rate
Qm (kg/s)
Evolution rate
Mass Balance:
dC
The dynamic mass balance on the volatile species V = Qm - kQv C
dt
Steady State:
æ dC ö Q
At steady state, the accumulati on term ç = 0 ÷ hence C = m
è dt ø kQv
16
Estimating Volatiles
Average conc. at steady state C = Qm/kQv
More convenient in terms of ppm:
Vv æ mv / rv ö æ mv ö æ Rg T ö
C ppm = ´10 = ç
6
÷ ´ 10 = ç ÷ ç
6
÷ ´ 10 6
Vb è Vb ø è Vb ø è PM ø (3-8)
Qm RT
Cppm = ´106 Equation (3-9)
kQv PM
Ideal mixing k =
Non-ideal k = Leads to higher concentrations
18
Step 1: Determine evaporation rate in
lb/min
æ 10 gal ö æ 1 ft 3
ö æ 62.4 lbm ö æ 1 hour ö
Qm = ç ÷ç ÷ç 3 ÷ (1.46 ) ç ÷
è 8 hour ø è 7.48 gal ø è ft ø è 60 min ø
Qm = 0.254 lbm/min
19
Step 2: Apply Equation (3-9)
Qm RT
Cppm = ´ 106
kQv PM
æ lb m ö æ ft 3 atm ö
ç
è
0.254 ֍
min ø è
0.7302
lb-mole o R ø
÷ ( 537 o
R ) x 10 6
C ppm =
æ ft 3 ö æ lb m ö
k ç1000 ÷(1 atm )ç 131 ÷
è min ø è lb-mole ø
760
C ppm = 0.1 £ k £ 0.5
k
@ k = 0.1 C ppm = 7, 600 ppm
@ k = 0.5 C ppm = 1,520 ppm
TLV is 10 ppm, STEL is 25 ppm 20
What ventilation rate required to reduce
below TLV?
æ lb m ö æ ft 3 atm ö
ç
è
0.254
min
֍
øè
0.7302
lb-mole o
R
÷ ( 537 o
R ) x 10 6
10 ppm = ø
æ lb m ö
( 0.1)( Qv )(1 atm ) ç131 ÷
è lb-mole ø
Qv = 760,000
Other control methods?
21
Estimating the Vaporization Rate
of a Liquid
Liquids with high saturation vapour pressures evaporate faster.
For a vaporization into stagnant air, the vaporization rate is generally
expressed via this source term:
Qm =
(
MKA P sat - p )
Rg TL
where
Qm = evaporation rate (mass/time)
M = molecular weight of the volatile substance
K = mass transfer coefficient (length/time) for an area A (area for mass transfer)
Rg = ideal gas constant, and
TL = absolute temperature of the liquid
Psat = saturation vapour pressure of pure liquid at temperature of the liquid
p = partial pressure of the vapour in the bulk stagnant gas above the liquid
KAP sat
C ppm = ´ 10 6
kQv P
Open 23
Filling Vessels
Total Volatiles = Evaporation + Displacement
Qm
Qm2
MP Sat
Qm1 Qm = (f rf Vc + KA ) Eq. 3-23
RTL
if TL = T:
P Sat
Cppm = (f rf Vc + KA) ´106 Eq. 3-24
kQv P
Splash filling: f=
Subsurface filling: f=
KA often small compared to displacement
24
Measuring Volatile Concentrations
Colorimetric Tubes
25
Measuring Volatile Concentrations
26
Measuring Volatile Concentrations
ß Filter unit, usually contains activated
charcoal.
27
Ventilation
DILUTION Dilution below target concentration
Mixing factor k see Table 3-15
Problems: Requires high air flow and energy
costs. Workers always exposed
DP » 0.01 atm
• eliminates exposure
• containment device
• shield
• limited workspace
Target Velocity:
100-124
ft/min of
airflow
Negative Positive
Bypass laboratory hood 28
pressure ventilation
Velometer for Measuring Flow
29
30
Hood Operation
31
Thermal Radiation
Thermal
Radiation Time for Time for 2nd
Intensity Severe Pain Degree Burns
kW/m2 s s
1 115 663
2 45 187
3 27 92
4 18 57
5 13 40
6 11 30
8 7 20
10 5 14
12 4 11
32
Thermal Radiation
1st degree burns are the least severe. For these burns the skin is red and
painful and swells slightly.
2nd degree burns have blisters and are painful.
3rd degree burns damage all the layers of the skin and the skin looks white
or charred – these burns may cause little or no pain if the nerves are
damaged.
33
Thermal Radiation
Thermal
Radiation Effects
Intensity
kW/m2
4 Glass ruined.
12 Plastic melting.
15 Wood firing, when there is an
ignition source.
18-20 Destruction of thermal insulation.
25 Automatic firing of wood.
37.5 Damage to process equipment.
100 Damage and breaking of steel.
34
Example
Flares are used to burn off vapors from a plant. The flare burns the vapors using
a flame at the top of a stack. One design criteria for a flare is that the thermal
radiation intensity in the vicinity of the flare on the ground should not exceed
1,500 BTU/hr ft2. What thermal effect will this have on the workers?
Solution
First convert to metric units:
2
2 æ 2.930 ´ 10 kW hr ö æ
-4
1 ft ö
(1,500 BTU/hr ft )ç 1 BTU
֍
è 0.3048 m
÷
ø
= 4.73 kW/m 2
è ø
From Table this will cause 2nd degree burns in about 40 s and 13 s to severe
pain. Access to the ground area around the flare must be controlled to prevent
burns.
35
Evaluating Noise
NOISE PROBLEMS ARE COMMON IN CHEMICAL PLANTS
For anything above 90 db OSHA requires a hearing conservation program.
I
Relative Noise Intensity = -10 log (dB) I 0 = hearing threshold
I0
(dBA)
9
Permissible exposure (h)
speech
factory
painful
8
traffic
office
7
5 Table 3-11
4
2
Similar calculations
1 as volatiles
0
60 70 80 90 100 110 120
36
dBA
Evaluating Exposures to Noise:
Noise Intensity (decibel)
Factory 90 8
Passing truck 100 2
Punch press 110 0.5
Refer to Table 3-11 (Crowl & Louvar – pg. 90) for the
Permissible Noise Exposure from OSHA CFR1910.05
Open 37
Example
Determine whether the following noise level is permissible with no additional
controls:
Noisy Office 80
Whisper 20
39
Additional Equations for Sound
An equation for the max. exposure time due to a sound is given by
(same as Figure):
8 hour
T = ( dB - 90) /5
2
Equation 3-5 in the textbook can be modified in terms of pressure by
replacing the sound intensities by the square of the absolute pressure:
2
æ I ö æPö æPö
dBA = 10 log10 ç ÷ = 10 log10 ç ÷ = 20 log10 ç ÷
è I0 ø è P0 ø è P0 ø
40
Noise Reduction Ratio (NRR)
41
Hearing Protection
42
Safety Showers / Eyewashes
44
Flammable Storage Cabinets
Offers protection from external
fire.
Vent hole is left closed, unless stored materials have an odor, in which
case the vent is connected to the ventilation system.
Do not store anything on the top.
Store only flammables, nothing else.
45
Control
CHEMICAL PLANT INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE METHODS
46
Legacy of the Past!
Late 1800s
47
Legacy of the Past!
1950s 48
Promise of the Present!
Today 49
Example problem on TWA for Mixture
= 5.5 ppm
The total mixture concentration is 5 + 20 + 10= 35 ppm. The workers
are overexposed under these circumstances.
An alternative approach is to use Equation 3-3:
3
Ci 5 20 10
å
i =1 (TLV - TWA)i
= +
5 50
+
2
= 6.4
51
Because this quantity is greater than 1, the TLV-TWA has been exceeded.
Estimating Worker Exposures to Toxic Vapors
Open 52
Estimating Worker Exposures to Toxic Vapors
54