Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Development Plan of Spam Drinking Water Distribution System in Central Cimahi Sub-District
Development Plan of Spam Drinking Water Distribution System in Central Cimahi Sub-District
Development Plan of Spam Drinking Water Distribution System in Central Cimahi Sub-District
DRINKING WATER
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM IN
CENTRAL CIMAHI SUB-DISTRICT
Muhammad Agung Satria1 and Benno Rahardyan2
Environmental Engineering
Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engin eering, Institut Teknologi Bandung
Jl. Ganesha No. 10 Bandung 40132
1magungs3@gmail.com and 2benno@ftsl.itb.ac.id
OBJECTIVES
• The purpose of this thesis is to provide considerations and alternatives related to planning the
development of clean water distribution networks in Cimahi Tengah District.
• The objectives of this thesis are:
1. To increase the coverage of clean water services in Cimahi City by distributing clean water
distribution systems in Cimahi Tengah sub-district.
2. To determine clean water distribution channels to serve drinking water needs in Cimahi
Tengah District.
2
AREA DESCRIPTION
3
EXSISTING CONDITION
4
EXISTING CONDITIONS
1
• UPT Air Minum Kota Cimahi Pipeline
Network
5
• UPT Air Minum Kota Cimahi Piping
Network Schematic
5
PLANNING
6
PLANNING
45,00
• Total water demand 40,00
2039
35,00
Non
30,00
Area Total Domestic
Total (L/s)
Domestic Total
Population Needs
Needs (L/det)
25,00
Served (L/det)
(L/det)
20,00
Baros 27657 16,97 2,70 19,66
15,00
Cigugur Tengah 61138 37,50 2,51 40,01
10,00
1
PLANNING
Time Usage Factor Water Usage
00.00-01.00 1,03 4,31%
01.00-02.00 1,03 4,30%
• Daily Water Usage Pattern 02.00-03.00 1,03 4,31%
03.00-04.00 1,03 4,29%
• Source: Cimahi City Water Use, July 2020 04.00-05.00 1,04 4,34%
05.00-06.00 1,04 4,35%
06.00-07.00 1,03 4,27%
07.00-08.00 0,98 4,09%
08.00-09.00 0,98 4,07%
09.00-10.00 0,98 4,07%
10.00-11.00 0,99 4,13%
11.00-12.00 0,99 4,11%
12.00-13.00 0,98 4,10%
13.00-14.00 0,99 4,13%
14.00-15.00 1,00 4,17%
15.00-16.00 1,00 4,16%
16.00-17.00 1,00 4,16%
17.00-18.00 1,00 4,15%
18.00-19.00 0,83 3,47%
19.00-20.00 0,93 3,86%
20.00-21.00 1,03 4,28%
21.00-22.00 1,03 4,28%
22.00-23.00 1,03 4,29%
23.00-24.00 1,03 4,29% 8
WATER DISTRIBUTION
ALTERNATIVE 1
• Alternative 1uses a branch water
distribution pattern.
• Has a headloss range of 0.97 m/km –
9.31 m/km
• Has a minimum pressure of 5.22 m and
maximum of 26.68 m.
• Has a velocity range of 0.59 m/s – 1.99
m/s
9
WATER DISTRIBUTION
ALTERNATIVE 2
• Alternative 2 uses a branch and loop
water distribution pattern.
• Has a headloss range of 0.86 m/km –
9.50 m/km
• Has a minimum pressure of 5.38 m and
maximum of 25.67 m.
• Has a velocity range of 0.37 m/s – 1.99
m/s
10
ALTERNATIVE SELECTION
Alternative 1 Alternative 2
Use as little energy as possible
1. Reservoir type Ground Ground
2. Distribution system Gravitational Gravitational
Ease of Installation
Reservoir height from ground level (m) 0 0
Minimum cost as possible
1. Pipe length (m) 11373.49 16282.64
2. Number of pipe segment 28 34
3. Number of Node 29 31
4. Number of Pipe Diameter Variations 4 4
5. Number of pipe diameter above200 mm 10 7
6. Maximum Pipe Diameter(mm) 300 300
7. Number of Loop 0 4
Peak Discharge Hydrolysis Criteria (Time 17.00)
1. Minimum velocity (m/s) 0.59 0.37
2. Maximum velocity (m/s) 1.99 1.99
3. Minimum pressure (m) 5.22 5.38
4. Maximum pressure (m) 26.68 47.89
5. Minimum headloss (m/km) 0.97 0.86
6. Maximum headloss (m/km) 9.31 9.50
11
SCORING ATTRIBUTE CRITERIA
• Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method is a simple and most frequently used multi
attribute decision selection technique.
• Based on average weighting.
• Requires a decision matrix normalization process (x) to a scale that can be compared
with all available alternative ratings
Scorin
No Criteria Attribute
g
A1 Pipe length 5 Cost
A2 Headloss 5 Cost
A3 Pressure left 5 Benefit
A4 Number of segment 4 Cost
A5 Velocity 5 Benefit
A6 Pipe diameter > 200mm 4 Cost
12
ALTERNATIVE SCORING RESULTS
Criteria
Alternative
• Criteria Based Decision Matrix A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6
1 11373.49 9.31 5.22 28 0.59 10
2 16282.64 9.50 5.38 34 0.37 7
Criteria
Alternative
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6
• Normalized Matrix 1 0.70 0.98 1 0,82 1 0,7
2 1 1 1,03 1 1,59 1
Criteria
Alternative Total
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6
• Therefore Alternative 2 is selected. 1 3.49 4.9 5 3.29 5 2.8 24,49
2 5 5 5.15 4 7.97 4 31,13
13
SELECTED SYSTEM COST BUDGET PLAN
14
CONCLUSION
• In the distribution system development plan for Central Cimahi District, the debit of
135.55 L / second is aimed at improving the services of the Sub-Districts Baros, Cigugur
Tengah, Karangmekar, Setiamanah, Cimahi, and Padasuka.
• Based on the high difference in elevation, the distribution system uses a gravity system.
• The total budget for the selected system costs is the total procurement of pipes plus the
total cost for installing pipes is Rp. 11,414,250,877.28
15
TECHNICAL DRAWING
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25